Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 17, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008771
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/2/571    most recent
biolreprod.102.008771v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vajta, G.
Right arrow Articles by Callesen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vajta, G.
Right arrow Articles by Callesen, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vajta, G.
Right arrow Articles by Callesen, H.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 571–578 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008771
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Embryo

Handmade Somatic Cell Cloning in Cattle: Analysis of Factors Contributing to High Efficiency In Vitro1

Gábor Vajta2,a, Ian M. Lewisc,d, Alan O. Trounsonc, Stig Purupb, Poul Maddox-Hyttele, Mette Schmidtf, Hanne Gervi Pedersenf, Torben Grevef, and Henrik Callesena

a Section of Reproductive Biology, b Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, and Section for Metabolism, Growth and Lactation, Department of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark c Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia d Genetics Australia Co-operative Ltd., Bacchus Marsh, Victoria 3340, Australia e Department of Anatomy and Physiology f Section of Reproduction, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

Widespread application of somatic cell cloning has been hampered by biological and technical problems, which include complicated and time-consuming procedures requiring skilled labor. Recently, zona-free techniques have been published with limited or no requirement for micromanipulators. The purpose of the present work was to optimize certain steps of the micromanipulator-free (i.e., handmade) procedure, to analyze the morphology of the developing blastocysts, and to explain factors involved in the high efficiencies observed. Optimization of the procedure included selection of the appropriate medium for enucleation, orientation of pairs at fusion, timing of fusion, and culture conditions. As a result of these improved steps, in vitro efficiency as measured by blastocysts per reconstructed embryo and blastocysts per working hour was among the highest described so far. The cattle serum used in our experiments was superior to other protein sources for in vitro embryo development. One possible explanation of this effect is the considerable mitogenic activity of the cattle serum compared with that of commercially available fetal calf serum. Morphological analysis of blastocysts by inverted microscopy, inner cell mass-trophoblast differential staining, and transmission electron microscopy revealed high average quality. A high initial pregnancy rate was achieved after the transfer of single blastocysts derived by aggregation of two nuclear transfer embryos into recipients. The improved handmade somatic cell nuclear transfer method may become a useful technology as a simple, inexpensive, and efficient alternative to traditional somatic cell nuclear transfer.

1 This work was supported by grant 53-00-0294 from the Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council and grant FREM98-8 from the Danish Directorate for Development.

2 Correspondence: Gábor Vajta, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark. FAX: 45 89 99 13 00; gabor.vajta{at}agrsci.dk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
L. Armstrong, M. Lako, W. Dean, and M. Stojkovic
Epigenetic Modification Is Central to Genome Reprogramming in Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Stem Cells, April 1, 2006; 24(4): 805 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
I. Lagutina, G. Lazzari, R. Duchi, S. Colleoni, N. Ponderato, P. Turini, G. Crotti, and C. Galli
Somatic cell nuclear transfer in horses: effect of oocyte morphology, embryo reconstruction method and donor cell type
Reproduction, October 1, 2005; 130(4): 559 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.M. Powell, N.C. Talbot, K.D. Wells, D.E. Kerr, V.G. Pursel, and R.J. Wall
Cell Donor Influences Success of Producing Cattle by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.