|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive Technology |
a Infigen, Inc., DeForest, Wisconsin 53532
b Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
c Department of Animal Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1284
To gain a better understanding of global methylation differences associated with development of nuclear transfer (NT)-generated cattle, we analyzed the genome-wide methylation status of spontaneously aborted cloned fetuses, cloned fetuses, and adult clones that were derived from transgenic and nontransgenic cumulus, genital ridge, and body cell lines. Cloned fetuses were recovered from ongoing normal pregnancies and were morphologically normal. Fetuses generated by artificial insemination (AI) were used as controls. In vitro fertilization (IVF) fetuses were compared with AI controls to assess effects of in vitro culture on the 5-methylcytosine content of fetal genomes. All of the fetuses were female. Skin biopsies were obtained from cloned and AI-generated adult cows. All of the adult clones were phenotypically normal and lactating and had no history of health or reproductive disorders. Genome-wide cytosine methylation levels were monitored by reverse-phase HPLC, and results indicated reduced levels of methylated cytosine in NT-generated fetuses. In contrast, no differences were observed between adult, lactating clones and similarly aged lactating cows produced by AI. These data imply that survivability of cloned cattle may be closely related to the global DNA methylation status. This is the first report to indicate that global methylation losses may contribute to the developmental failure of cloned bovine fetuses.
2 Correspondence: Kenneth J. Eilertsen, Infigen, Inc., 1825 Infinity Dr., DeForest, WI 53532. FAX: 608 846 0520; e-mail: keilertsen{at}infigen.com
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Giraldo, D. A. Hylan, C. B. Ballard, M. N. Purpera, T. D. Vaught, J. W. Lynn, R. A. Godke, and K. R. Bondioli Effect of Epigenetic Modifications of Donor Somatic Cells on the Subsequent Chromatin Remodeling of Cloned Bovine Embryos Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 832 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Niemann, X C. Tian, W A. King, and R. S F Lee Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 151 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hiendleder, M. Wirtz, C. Mund, M. Klempt, H.-D. Reichenbach, M. Stojkovic, M. Weppert, H. Wenigerkind, M. Elmlinger, F. Lyko, et al. Tissue-Specific Effects of In Vitro Fertilization Procedures on Genomic Cytosine Methylation Levels in Overgrown and Normal Sized Bovine Fetuses Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 17 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Constant, M. Guillomot, Y. Heyman, X. Vignon, P. Laigre, J.L. Servely, J.P. Renard, and P. Chavatte-Palmer Large Offspring or Large Placenta Syndrome? Morphometric Analysis of Late Gestation Bovine Placentomes from Somatic Nuclear Transfer Pregnancies Complicated by Hydrallantois Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 122 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Hiendleder, C. Mund, H.-D. Reichenbach, H. Wenigerkind, G. Brem, V. Zakhartchenko, F. Lyko, and E. Wolf Tissue-Specific Elevated Genomic Cytosine Methylation Levels Are Associated with an Overgrowth Phenotype of Bovine Fetuses Derived by In Vitro Techniques Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 217 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Farin, P. W. Farin, and J. A. Piedrahita Development of fetuses from in vitro-produced and cloned bovine embryos J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E53 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Archer, S. Dindot, T. H. Friend, S. Walker, G. Zaunbrecher, B. Lawhorn, and J. A. Piedrahita Hierarchical Phenotypic and Epigenetic Variation in Cloned Swine Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 430 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |