Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print November 13, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008656
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/3/812    most recent
biolreprod.102.008656v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Combelles, C. M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Combelles, C. M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, D. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Combelles, C. M.H.
Right arrow Articles by Albertini, D. F.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 812–821 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.008656
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Gamete Biology

Assessment of Oocyte Quality Following Repeated Gonadotropin Stimulation in the Mouse1

Catherine M.H. Combellesa, and David F. Albertini2,a

a Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02111

The present study assessed the effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on oocyte quality. Female mice were stimulated with eCG and hCG at 1-wk intervals for 4 wk. Germinal vesicle (GV)-stage oocytes were evaluated in relation to size, somatic cell association, and chromatin organization after each week of stimulation. In addition, ATP content and expression of meiotic competence were monitored in GV and in vivo (IVO) or in vitro (IVM)-matured oocytes. The developmental competence of ovulated oocytes was determined after in vitro fertilization and embryo culture, and reproductive outcome was evaluated after mating following repeated cycles of stimulation. In GV oocytes, the degree of somatic cell association, size, and timing of transcriptional repression were altered when comparing repeated with single cycle(s) of stimulation. Meiotic competence expression was unaffected for IVO oocytes while IVM oocytes exhibited a progressive decrease in meiotic competence with repeated stimulation. The ATP content of immature and IVO oocytes decreased with repeated stimulation. Although after one cycle of stimulation ATP content was lower in IVM than IVO oocytes, IVM oocytes exhibited stable levels of ATP across cycles of stimulation. Last, the in vitro developmental competence of IVO oocytes retrieved after repeated stimulation was not significantly different, and in vivo, similar implantation and resorption rates were observed following mating of animals subjected to repeated stimulation. Therefore, despite measurable consequences of repeated stimulation on specific parameters of follicular oocyte quality, compensatory mechanisms may exist in vivo to optimize the developmental competence of ovulated oocytes in the mouse.

1 This work was supported by research grant 1-FY01-248 from the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. C.M.H.C. was supported in part by the NIH Training Program in Developmental Biology HD07403.

2 Correspondence: David F. Albertini, Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. FAX: 617 636 6536; e-mail: david.albertini{at}tufts.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. E. Swain and T. B. Pool
ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 431 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. A. Murray, A. K.E. Swales, R. E. Smith, M. D. Molinek, S. G. Hillier, and N. Spears
Follicular growth and oocyte competence in the in vitro cultured mouse follicle: effects of gonadotrophins and steroids
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 14(2): 75 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. T. Johnson, E. A. Freeman, D. K. Gardner, and P. A. Hunt
Oxidative Metabolism of Pyruvate Is Required for Meiotic Maturation of Murine Oocytes In Vivo
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 2 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Ibanez, A. Sanfins, C. M H Combelles, E. W Overstrom, and D. F Albertini
Genetic strain variations in the metaphase-II phenotype of mouse oocytes matured in vivo or in vitro
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 845 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Navarro-Costa, S.C. Correia, A. Gouveia-Oliveira, F. Negreiro, S. Jorge, A.J. Cidadao, M.J. Carvalho, and C.E. Plancha
Effects of mouse ovarian tissue cryopreservation on granulosa cell-oocyte interaction
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1607 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
F. H. Thomas, J.-F. Ethier, S. Shimasaki, and B. C. Vanderhyden
Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Regulates Oocyte Growth by Modulation of Expression of Oocyte and Granulosa Cell Factors
Endocrinology, February 1, 2005; 146(2): 941 - 949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Sanfins, C. E. Plancha, E. W. Overstrom, and D. F. Albertini
Meiotic spindle morphogenesis in in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: insights into the relationship between nuclear and cytoplasmic quality
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2889 - 2899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Sanfins, G. Y. Lee, C. E. Plancha, E. W. Overstrom, and D. F. Albertini
Distinctions in Meiotic Spindle Structure and Assembly During In Vitro and In Vivo Maturation of Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2059 - 2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.