| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive Technology |
a Section of Reproductive Biology, Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
b Department of Clinical Studies, Reproduction, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
c Guangxi University, Institute of Animal Reproduction, Nanning 530005, China
Day 7 bovine somatic nuclear transfer (NT) embryos reconstructed from granulosa cells were examined for numerical chromosome aberrations as a potential cause of the high embryonic and fetal loss observed in such embryos after transfer. The NT embryos were reconstructed using a zona-free manipulation method: half-cytoplasts were made from zona-free oocytes by bisection, after which two half-oocytes and one granulosa cell (serum-starved primary culture) were fused together and activated. The NT embryos were cultured in modified synthetic oviductal fluid containing essential and nonessential amino acids, myoinositol, sodium citrate, and 5% cattle serum in microwells for 7 days, at which time nuclei from all blastocysts were extracted and chromosome aberrations were evaluated using dual-color fluorescent in situ hybridization with bovine chromosome 6- and 7-specific probes. Five embryo clone families, consisting of 112 blastocysts reconstructed from five different primary granulosa cell cultures, were examined. Overall, the mean chromosome complement within embryos was 86.9 ± 3.7% (mean ± SEM) diploid, 2.6 ± 0.5% triploid, 10.0 ± 3.1% tetraploid, and 0.5 ± 0.2% pentaploid or greater; the vast majority (>75%) of the abnormal nuclei were tetraploid. Completely diploid and mixoploid embryos represented 22.1 ± 4.5% and 73.7 ± 5.5%, respectively, of all clones. Six totally polyploid blastocysts, containing 
91 nuclei, were recorded. The ploidy distributions (classified as 2N, 3N, 4N, and 
5N chromosome complements, respectively) between two clone families were different (P < 0.01), as were blastocyst yields between other clone families (P < 0.01). Blastocyst yield was not correlated to % total ploidy error between clone families, but an inverse relationship (P < 0.01) between blastocyst total cell number and total % chromosome abnormality was observed within embryos. Categorization of the blastocysts into three quality grades (good, medium, and poor) and comparison of the distribution of ploidies when classified into 0%, 0.1–5.0%, 5.1–10.0%, 10.1–15.0%, and 15.1–100% errors within embryos indicated that medium- and poor-grade embryos were different (P < 0.05) from good-quality, in vitro-produced embryos. In a separate study, 11 different granulosa cell cultures (that did not correspond to those used for NT) were evaluated and found to possess only 0.23 ± 0.12% ploidy errors. These results demonstrate that 1) the percentage of ploidy errors in bovine NT blastocysts is inversely related to total blastocyst cell number, 2) the mixoploid condition is representative of the majority of embryos, 3) 100% polyploid NT blastocysts can exist, and 4) the ploidy errors seem not to be derived from the donor cells.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. I Alexopoulos, P. Maddox-Hyttel, P. Tveden-Nyborg, N. T D'Cruz, T. R Tecirlioglu, M. A Cooney, K. Schauser, M. K Holland, and A. J French Developmental disparity between in vitro-produced and somatic cell nuclear transfer bovine days 14 and 21 embryos: implications for embryonic loss Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 433 - 445. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L.-Y. Sung, P.-C. Shen, B.-S. Jeong, J. Xu, C.-C. Chang, W. T.K. Cheng, J.-S. Wu, S.-N. Lee, D. Broek, D. Faber, et al. Premature Chromosome Condensation Is Not Essential for Nuclear Reprogramming in Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 232 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Dai, L. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Liu, N. Li, Q. Lyu, D. L Keefe, D. F Albertini, and L. Liu Fate of centrosomes following somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) in bovine oocytes. Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1051 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rybouchkin, Y. Kato, and Y. Tsunoda Role of Histone Acetylation in Reprogramming of Somatic Nuclei Following Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1083 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Powell, N.C. Talbot, K.D. Wells, D.E. Kerr, V.G. Pursel, and R.J. Wall Cell Donor Influences Success of Producing Cattle by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 210 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Shi, F. Dirim, E. Wolf, V. Zakhartchenko, and T. Haaf Methylation Reprogramming and Chromosomal Aneuploidy in In Vivo Fertilized and Cloned Rabbit Preimplantation Embryos Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 340 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-P Li, K L White, K I Aston, L N Meerdo, and T D Bunch Conditioned medium increases the polyploid cell composition of bovine somatic cell nuclear-transferred blastocysts Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 221 - 228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
