Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print December 11, 2002.
Biol Reprod 2002, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012138
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
68/5/1748    most recent
biolreprod.102.012138v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martoriati, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gérard, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martoriati, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gérard, N.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Martoriati, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gérard, N.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 68, 1748–1754 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.012138
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Ovary

In Vivo Effect of Epidermal Growth Factor, Interleukin-1ß, and Interleukin-1RA on Equine Preovulatory Follicles1

Alain Martoriati, Guy Duchamp, and Nadine Gérard2

I.N.R.A.-Haras Nationaux, Equipe de Reproduction Equine, P.R.C., F-37380 Nouzilly, France

Paracrine factors have significant effects during folliculogenesis. Because of various morphological features, the mare is a convenient model to study in vivo the effects of factors involved in periovulatory events. In the present work, epidermal growth factor (EGF; experiment 1, n = 49 mares) and interleukin-1ß and interleukin-1RA (IL-1ß and IL-1RA, respectively; experiment 2, n = 80 mares) were injected intrafollicularly to evaluate the influence of these factors on in vivo maturation of equine preovulatory follicles. A transvaginal ultrasound-guided injection was performed when the diameter of the dominant follicle reached 30–34 mm. In experiment 1, the four experimental groups were 1) EGF group, intrafollicular (i.f.) injection of EGF (2 ml; 0.5 µg/ml) plus i.v. injection of physiological serum; 2) control group, no injection; 3) PBS group, i.f. injection of 2 ml of PBS plus i.v. injection of physiological serum; 4) crude equine gonadotropins (CEG) group, i.f. injection of PBS plus i.v. injection of CEG (20 mg). In experiment 2, groups 3 and 4 were the same as in experiment 1, but groups 1 and 2 were changed as follows: 1) IL-1ß group, i.f. injection of IL-1ß (2 ml; 0.5 µg/ml) plus i.v. injection of physiological serum; 2) IL-1RA group, i.f. injection of IL-1RA (2 ml; 0.5 µg/ml) plus i.v. injection of physiological serum. In each experiment, cumulus-oocyte complexes from dominant/injected follicles were collected by transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration 38 h after intrafollicular injection. Cumulus morphology and oocyte nuclear stage were assessed. Additionally, in experiment 2, 40 mares were used to determine the time of ovulation after treatments. Our results indicate that intrafollicular injection of EGF or PBS induced lower cumulus expansion and oocyte maturation rates compared with the CEG group (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, the IL-1ß and CEG groups showed the same expansion rate, the same oocyte maturation rate, and the same ovulation distribution. On the other hand, the intrafollicular injection of IL-1RA, as PBS, did not induce follicle and cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) maturation. In conclusion, we confirmed that the technique of intrafollicular injection can be used in the mare to study the role of specific molecules. We demonstrated for the first time in mares that the injection of EGF did not influence in vivo COC maturation. In contrast, IL-1ß injection into the dominant follicle induced in vivo oocyte maturation and the ovulation process whereas IL-1RA seemed to block these mechanisms.

1 This work was supported by grants from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France, and the Haras Nationaux, France. A.M. was supported by a fellowship from the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, France, and the Région Centre, France.

2 Correspondence. FAX: 33 2 47 42 77 43; gerard{at}tours.inra.fr







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.