|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive Technology |
Centre de recherche en reproduction animal,3
Département de sciences cliniques,4 Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada J2S 7C6
Nexia Biotechnologies, Inc.,5 Vaudreuil-Dorion, Quebec, Canada J7V 8P5
In vitro transfection of cultured cells combined with nuclear transfer currently is the most effective procedure to produce transgenic livestock. In the present study, bovine primary fetal fibroblasts were transfected with a green fluorescent protein (GFP)-reporter transgene and used as nuclear donor cells in oocyte reconstructions. Because cell synchronization protocols are less effective after transfection, activated oocytes may be more suitable as hosts for nuclear transfer. To examine the role of host cytoplasm on transgene expression and developmental outcome, GFP-expressing fibroblasts were fused to oocytes reconstructed either before (metaphase) or after (telophase) activation. Expression of GFP was examined during early embryogenesis, in tissues of cloned calves, and again during embryogenesis, after passage through germ line using semen from the transgenic cloned offspring. Regardless of the kind of host cytoplasm used, GFP became detectable at the 8- to 16-cell stage, approximately 80 h after reconstruction, and remained positive at all later stages. After birth, although cloned calves obtained through both procedures expressed GFP in all tissues examined, expression levels varied both between tissues and between cells within the same tissue, indicating a partial shutdown of GFP expression during cellular differentiation. Moreover, nonexpressing fibroblasts derived from transgenic offspring were unable to direct GFP expression after nuclear transfer and development to the blastocyst stage, suggesting an irreversible silencing of transgenes. Nonetheless, GFP was expressed in approximately half the blastocysts obtained with sperm from a transgenic clone, confirming transmission of the transgene through the germ line.
2 Correspondence: Lawrence C. Smith, University of Montreal, CRRA/Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Ste-Hyacinthe, PQ, Canada J2S 7C6. FAX: 450 778 8103; smithl{at}medvet.umontreal.ca
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-M. Zheng, H.-Y. Zhao, X.-E Zhao, F.-S. Quan, S. Hua, X.-Y. He, J. Liu, X.-N. He, and H. Lin Development of cloned embryos from porcine neural stem cells and amniotic fluid-derived stem cells transfected with enhanced green fluorescence protein gene Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 793 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D J Kwon, C K Park, B K Yang, and H T Cheong Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryos Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 649 - 656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. J. Yin, H. S. Lee, X. F. Yu, E. Choi, B. C. Koo, M. S. Kwon, Y. S. Lee, S. J. Cho, G. Z. Jin, L. H. Kim, et al. Generation of Cloned Transgenic Cats Expressing Red Fluorescence Protein Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 425 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schurmann, D. N Wells, and B. Oback Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring. Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R Arnold, V. Bordignon, R. Lefebvre, B. D Murphy, and L. C Smith Somatic cell nuclear transfer alters peri-implantation trophoblast differentiation in bovine embryos. Reproduction, August 1, 2006; 132(2): 279 - 290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Watanabe, M. Iwamoto, S.-i. Suzuki, D. Fuchimoto, D. Honma, T. Nagai, M. Hashimoto, S. Yazaki, M. Sato, and A. Onishi A Novel Method for the Production of Transgenic Cloned Pigs: Electroporation-Mediated Gene Transfer to Non-Cultured Cells and Subsequent Selection with Puromycin Biol Reprod, February 1, 2005; 72(2): 309 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |