Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 19, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013250
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/1/15    most recent
biolreprod.102.013250v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cui, W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cui, W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cui, W.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, A. J.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 15–21 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.102.013250
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Telomerase-Immortalized Sheep Fibroblasts Can Be Reprogrammed by Nuclear Transfer to Undergo Early Development1

Wei Cui, Diana Wylie, Samena Aslam, Andres Dinnyes, Tim King, Ian Wilmut, and A. John Clark2

Department of Gene Expression and Development, Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, United Kingdom

Telomere shortening and lack of telomerase activity have been implicated in cellular senescence in human fibroblasts. Expression of the human telomerase catalytic reverse transcriptase subunit (hTERT) in these cells reconstitutes telomerase activity and immortalizes the cells without tumor transformation. In this report, we show that sheep fibroblasts are similar to human cells. They do not have detectable telomerase activity and undergo only a finite numbers of cell divisions before replicative senescence. Telomere lengths in sheep fibroblasts are similar to those reported for human cells and shorten at a rate of 50–200 base pairs (bp) each cell division. Expression of the human telomerase catalytic subunit restored the telomerase activity in the sheep cells and extended their proliferative life span. None of the telomerase positive sheep fibroblasts exhibited a transformed phenotype after 200 days of continuous culture, and the higher hTERT expressing cells maintained their telomere lengths and normal cell characteristics for more than 500 days in culture. In cloning experiments using one of these cell lines as a nuclear donor, the reconstructed karyoplasts were reprogrammed and developed to the blastocyst stage at a similar frequency to that observed with the parental, telomerase negative cell line. After embryo transfer the blastocysts exhibited a relatively high frequency of implantation, early fetal development, and organogenesis. No fetuses survived beyond 40 days of development, however, showing that although these cells could be substantially reprogrammed, they were not fully competent for nuclear transfer.

1 This work was supported by the BBSRC and the Geron Corporation.

2 Correspondence. FAX: 44 0 131 440 0434; john.clark{at}bbsrc.ac.uk




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
C. Yang, S. Przyborski, M. J. Cooke, X. Zhang, R. Stewart, G. Anyfantis, S. P. Atkinson, G. Saretzki, L. Armstrong, and M. Lako
A Key Role for Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Unit in Modulating Human Embryonic Stem Cell Proliferation, Cell Cycle Dynamics, and In Vitro Differentiation
Stem Cells, April 1, 2008; 26(4): 850 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.M. Powell, N.C. Talbot, K.D. Wells, D.E. Kerr, V.G. Pursel, and R.J. Wall
Cell Donor Influences Success of Producing Cattle by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.