| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Testis |
Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Spermatogonial transplantation provides access to the mammalian germline and has been used in experimental animal models to study stem cell/niche biology and germline development, to restore fertility, and to produce transgenic models. The potential to manipulate and/or transplant the germline has numerous practical applications that transcend species boundaries. To make the transplantation technology more broadly accessible, it is necessary to develop practical recipient preparation protocols. In the current study, mouse recipients for spermatogonial transplantation were prepared by treating pregnant females with the chemotherapeutic agent busulfan at different times during gestation. Donor germ cells were introduced into the testes of male progeny between 5 and 12 days postpartum. Analysis of recipient animals revealed that busulfan treatment of pregnant females on 12.5 days postcoitum was the most effective; male progeny transplanted with donor germ cells became fertile and passed the donor genotype to 25% of progeny. This approach was effective because 1) the cytoablative treatment reduced (but did not abolish) endogenous spermatogenesis, creating space for colonization by donor stem cells, 2) residual endogenous germ cells contributed to a healthy testicular environment that supported robust donor and recipient spermatogenesis, and 3) fetal busulfan-treated males could be transplanted as pups, which have been established as better recipients than adults. Laboratory mice provide a valuable experimental model for developing the technology that now can be applied and evaluated in other species.
2 Correspondence: K.E. Orwig, Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3850 Baltimore Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19104. FAX: 215 898 0667; korwig{at}vet.upenn.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B. P. Hermann, M. Sukhwani, D. R. Simorangkir, T. Chu, T. M. Plant, and K. E. Orwig Molecular dissection of the male germ cell lineage identifies putative spermatogonial stem cells in rhesus macaques Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1704 - 1716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Lei, T. Karpova, K. I. Hornbaker, D. A. Rice, and L. L. Heckert Distinct Transcriptional Mechanisms Direct Expression of the Rat Dmrt1 Promoter in Sertoli Cells and Germ Cells of Transgenic Mice Biol Reprod, July 1, 2009; 81(1): 118 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kawashima, B. A.H. Osman, M. Takashima, A. Kikuchi, S. Kohchi, E. Satoh, M. Tamba, M. Matsuda, and N. Okamura CABS1 Is a Novel Calcium-Binding Protein Specifically Expressed in Elongate Spermatids of Mice Biol Reprod, June 1, 2009; 80(6): 1293 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Kim, D. Turner, J. Nelson, I. Dobrinski, M. McEntee, and A. J Travis Production of donor-derived sperm after spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in the dog Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 823 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Orwig, B.-Y. Ryu, S. R. Master, B. T. Phillips, M. Mack, M. R. Avarbock, L. Chodosh, and R. L. Brinster Genes Involved in Post-Transcriptional Regulation Are Overrepresented in Stem/Progenitor Spermatogonia of Cryptorchid Mouse Testes Stem Cells, April 1, 2008; 26(4): 927 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. M. Lee, J. G. Jung, J. N. Kim, T. S. Park, T. M. Kim, S. S. Shin, D. K. Kang, J. M. Lim, and J. Y. Han A Testis-Mediated Germline Chimera Production Based on Transfer of Chicken Testicular Cells Directly into Heterologous Testes Biol Reprod, September 1, 2006; 75(3): 380 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Goossens, V. Frederickx, G. de Block, A. van Steirteghem, and H. Tournaye Evaluation of in vivo conception after testicular stem cell transplantation in a mouse model shows altered post-implantation development Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2057 - 2060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Zhang, S. Shao, and M. L. Meistrich Irradiated Mouse Testes Efficiently Support Spermatogenesis Derived From Donor Germ Cells of Mice and Rats J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 365 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Kim, V. Selvaraj, I. Dobrinski, H. Lee, M. C. Mcentee, and A. J. Travis Recipient Preparation and Mixed Germ Cell Isolation for Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Domestic Cats J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 248 - 256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Honaramooz, E. Behboodi, C. L. Hausler, S. Blash, S. Ayres, C. Azuma, Y. Echelard, and I. Dobrinski Depletion of Endogenous Germ Cells in Male Pigs and Goats in Preparation for Germ Cell Transplantation J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 698 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E. Orwig and S. Schlatt Cryopreservation and Transplantation of Spermatogonia and Testicular Tissue for Preservation of Male Fertility J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 51 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara Transgenic Mice Produced by Retroviral Transduction of Male Germ Line Stem Cells In Vivo Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1202 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, N. Ogonuki, K. Inoue, A. Ogura, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara Restoration of fertility in infertile mice by transplantation of cryopreserved male germline stem cells Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2660 - 2667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
