|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ovary |
and Progesterone on the Ability of Bovine Luteal Cells to Stimulate T Lymphocyte Proliferation1
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio 44691
Bovine luteal cells express class I and II major histocompatibility complex molecules and stimulate T lymphocyte proliferation in vitro. Proliferation of T lymphocytes is greater in cocultures of luteal cells and T lymphocytes collected following administration of a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin (PG) F2
to the cow. Whether this results from changes in luteal cells that increase their ability to stimulate T lymphocyte proliferation or from changes in T lymphocytes that enhance their ability to respond to luteal cells is unclear. To determine which is the case, luteal cell-T lymphocyte cocultures were performed using luteal cells and T lymphocytes isolated from the same animals before and 8 h after administration of PGF2
. In the presence of T lymphocytes collected before PGF2
administration, luteal cells isolated after PGF2
were more potent stimulators of T lymphocyte proliferation than were luteal cells collected before PGF2
(P < 0.05). The effect of progesterone on luteal cell-stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation was also evaluated. Proliferation of T lymphocytes was greater (P < 0.05) in cultures containing the cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme-inhibitor aminoglutethimide. Exogenous progesterone caused a dose-dependent inhibition of luteal cell-stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation (P < 0.05). Progesterone-receptor mRNA was undetectable in peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected before and after PGF2
administration, indicating that the effect of progesterone was not mediated via progesterone receptors in lymphocytes. These results imply that specific changes in luteal cells in response to PGF2
enhance the ability of these cells to stimulate T lymphocyte proliferation. These results also demonstrate that progesterone can suppress luteal cell-stimulated T lymphocyte proliferation.
2 Correspondence: Joy L. Pate, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH 44691. FAX: 330 263 3949; pate.1{at}osu.edu
3 Current address: Anatomy and Cell Biology Unit, The University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Ndiaye, D. H. Poole, and J. L. Pate Expression and Regulation of Functional Oxytocin Receptors in Bovine T Lymphocytes Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 786 - 793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L Davis and J. L Pate Bovine Luteal Cells Stimulate Proliferation of Major Histocompatibility Nonrestricted Gamma Delta T Cells Biol Reprod, December 1, 2007; 77(6): 914 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. H. Townson Immune cell-endothelial cell interactions in the bovine corpus luteum Integr. Comp. Biol., December 1, 2006; 46(6): 1055 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Cannon, J. S Davis, and J. L Pate Presence and regulation of messenger ribonucleic acids encoding components of the class II major histocompatibility complex-associated antigen processing pathway in the bovine corpus luteum. Reproduction, April 1, 2006; 131(4): 689 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Liptak, B. T. Sullivan, L. E. Henkes, M. P.B. Wijayagunawardane, A. Miyamoto, J. S. Davis, B. R. Rueda, and D. H. Townson Cooperative Expression of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Within the Bovine Corpus Luteum: Evidence of Immune Cell-Endothelial Cell Interactions in a Coculture System Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1169 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Okuda, A. Korzekwa, M. Shibaya, S. Murakami, R. Nishimura, M. Tsubouchi, I. Woclawek-Potocka, and D. J. Skarzynski Progesterone Is a Suppressor of Apoptosis in Bovine Luteal Cells Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2065 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |