| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reproductive Technology |
Department of Animal Science,3 Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
Audubon Center for Research of Endangered Species,4 New Orleans, Louisiana 70131
National Wetlands Research Center,5 U.S. Geological Survey, Lafayette, Louisiana 70506
Department of Biological Sciences,6 University of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana 70148
The African wild cat is one of the smallest wild cats and its future is threatened by hybridization with domestic cats. Nuclear transfer, a valuable tool for retaining genetic variability, offers the possibility of species continuation rather than extinction. The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of somatic cell nuclei of the African wild cat (AWC) to dedifferentiate within domestic cat (DSH) cytoplasts and to support early development after nuclear transplantation. In experiment 1, distributions of AWC and DSH fibroblasts in each cell-cycle phase were assessed by flow cytometry using cells cultured to confluency and disaggregated with pronase, trypsin, or mechanical separation. Trypsin (89.0%) and pronase (93.0%) yielded higher proportions of AWC nuclei in the G0/G1 phase than mechanical separation (82.0%). In contrast, mechanical separation yielded higher percentages of DSH nuclei in the G0/G1 phase (86.6%) than pronase (79.7%) or trypsin (74.2%) treatments. In both species, pronase induced less DNA damage than trypsin. In experiment 2, the effects of serum starvation, culture to confluency, and exposure to roscovitine on the distribution of AWC and DSH fibroblasts in various phases of the cell cycle were determined. Flow cytometry analyses revealed that the dynamics of the cell cycle varied as culture conditions were modified. Specifically, a higher percentage of AWC and DSH nuclei were in the G0/G1 phase after cells were serum starved (83% vs. 96%) than were present in cycling cells (50% vs. 64%), after contact inhibition (61% vs. 88%), or after roscovitine (56% vs. 84%) treatment, respectively. In experiment 3, we evaluated the effects of cell synchronization and oocyte maturation (in vivo vs. in vitro) on the reconstruction and development of AWC-DSH- and DSH-DSH-cloned embryos. The method of cell synchronization did not affect the fusion and cleavage rate because only a slightly higher percentage of fused couplets cleaved when donor nuclei were synchronized by serum starvation (83.0%) than after roscovitine (80.0%) or contact-inhibition (80.0%). The fusion efficiency of in vivo and in vitro matured oocytes used as recipient cytoplasts of AWC donor nuclei (86.6% vs. 85.2%) was similar to the rates obtained with DSH donor nuclei, 83.7% vs. 73.0%, respectively. The only significant effect of source of donor nucleus (AWC vs. DSH) was on the rate of blastocyst formation in vitro. A higher percentage of the embryos derived from AWC nuclei developed to the blastocyst stage than did embryos produced from DSH nuclei, 24.2% vs. 3.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). In experiment 4, the effect of calcium in the fusion medium on induction of oocyte activation and development of AWC-DSH-cloned embryos was determined. The presence of calcium in the fusion medium induced a high incidence of cleavage of DSH oocytes (54.3%), while oocyte cleavage frequency was much lower in the absence of calcium (16.6%). The presence or absence of calcium in the fusion medium did not affect the fusion, cleavage, and blastocyst development of AWC-DSH-cloned embryos. In experiment 5, AWC-DSH-cloned embryos were transferred to the uteri of 11 synchronized domestic cat recipients on Day 6 or 7 after oocyte aspiration. Recipients were assessed by ultrasonography on Day 21 postovulation, but no pregnancies were observed. In the present study, after NT, AWC donor nuclei were able to dedifferentiate in DSH cytoplasts and support high rates of blastocyst development in vitro. Incomplete reprogramming of the differentiated nucleus may be a major constraint to the in vivo developmental potential of the embryos.
2 Correspondence: Martha C. Gómez, Audubon Center for Research of Endangered Species, 14001 River Road, New Orleans, LA, 70131. FAX: 504 3917707; mgomez{at}auduboninstitute.org
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. S. Razzaque Can patient-specific stem cell therapy enhance renal repair? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1826 - 1830. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. J. Yin, H. S. Lee, X. F. Yu, E. Choi, B. C. Koo, M. S. Kwon, Y. S. Lee, S. J. Cho, G. Z. Jin, L. H. Kim, et al. Generation of Cloned Transgenic Cats Expressing Red Fluorescence Protein Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 425 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. F. Mastromonaco, L. A. Favetta, L. C. Smith, F. Filion, and W. A. King The Influence of Nuclear Content on Developmental Competence of Gaur x Cattle Hybrid In Vitro Fertilized and Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 514 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K Hinrichs, Y H Choi, C C Love, Y G Chung, and D D Varner Production of horse foals via direct injection of roscovitine-treated donor cells and activation by injection of sperm extract. Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1063 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
X J Yin, H S Lee, Y H Lee, Y I Seo, S J Jeon, E G Choi, S J Cho, S G Cho, W Min, S K Kang, et al. Cats cloned from fetal and adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer Reproduction, February 1, 2005; 129(2): 245 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
