| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ovary |
Molecular Reproduction Research Laboratory,3 Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H2W 1R7
Faculté de Médecine,4 Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada H3C 3J7
Department of Physiology,5 McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3G 1Y6
Targeted disruption of the mouse FSH receptor gene (FSH-R) that mediates the action of the FSH results in a gene dose-related ovarian phenotype in the developing as well as the adult animal. While null females (FORKO) are sterile, the haplo-insufficient mice experience early reproductive senescence. The purpose of this study was to first record changes in oocyte development in the null FORKO and haplo-insufficient mice. Oocyte growth is significantly retarded in the null mutants with thinner zona pellucida in preantral follicles, but thicker zona pellucida in secondary follicles. This morphometric change indicates developmental aberrations in coordination of the germ cell (oocyte) and the somatic granulosa cell (GC) compartments. Markers for primordial germ cell proliferation and oocyte growth, such as the c-Kit/Kit-ligand and bone morphogenetic protein-15 (BMP-15) were downregulated in both null and +/- ovaries, suggesting disrupted communication between oocyte and GCs. Extensive changes in the expression of other oocyte-specific gene products like the zona pellucida glycoproteins (zona pellucida A, B, and C) indicate major alteration in the extracellular matrix surrounding the germ cells. This led to leaky germ cells that allowed infiltration of somatic cells. These results show that the loss of FSH-R signaling alters the follicular environment, where oocyte-granulosa interactions are perturbed, creating an out-of-phase germ cell and somatic cell development. We believe that these data provide an experimental paradigm to explore the mechanisms responsible for preserving the structural integrity and quality of oocytes at different ages.
2 Correspondence: M. Ram Sairam, Molecular Reproduction Research Laboratory, Clinical Research Institute of Montréal, 110, avenue des Pins West, Montréal, PQ, Canada H2W 1R7. FAX: 514 987 5585; sairamm{at}ircm.qc.ca
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. A. Williams and P. Stanley Mouse fertility is enhanced by oocyte-specific loss of core 1-derived O-glycans FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2273 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Tiwari-Pandey, Y. Yang, J. Aravindakshan, and M.R. Sairam Normalization of hormonal imbalances, ovarian follicular dynamics and metabolic effects in follitrophin receptor knockout mice Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 13(5): 287 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Inzunza, A. Morani, G. Cheng, M. Warner, J. Hreinsson, J.-A. Gustafsson, and O. Hovatta Ovarian wedge resection restores fertility in estrogen receptor beta knockout (ERbeta-/-) mice PNAS, January 9, 2007; 104(2): 600 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Gueripel, V. Brun, and A. Gougeon Oocyte Bone Morphogenetic Protein 15, but not Growth Differentiation Factor 9, Is Increased During Gonadotropin-Induced Follicular Development in the Immature Mouse and Is Associated with Cumulus Oophorus Expansion Biol Reprod, December 1, 2006; 75(6): 836 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T R. Kumar What have we learned about gonadotropin function from gonadotropin subunit and receptor knockout mice? Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 293 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M Myers, K L Britt, N G M Wreford, F J P Ebling, and J B Kerr Methods for quantifying follicular numbers within the mouse ovary Reproduction, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 569 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Balla, N. Danilovich, Y. Yang, and M. R. Sairam Dynamics of Ovarian Development in the FORKO Immature Mouse: Structural and Functional Implications for Ovarian Reserve Biol Reprod, October 1, 2003; 69(4): 1281 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
