Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print August 6, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.018945
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/6/1890    most recent
biolreprod.103.018945v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tani, T.
Right arrow Articles by Tsunoda, Y.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 1890–1894 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.018945
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Reprogramming of Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclei Is Not Directly Regulated by Maturation Promoting Factor or Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity1

Tetsuya Tani, Yoko Kato, and Yukio Tsunoda2

Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, College of Agriculture, Kinki University, Nara, 631-8505, Japan

Cloned mammals with normal fertility have been produced by nuclear transfer. Thus, oocyte cytoplasm has the ability to convert differentiated somatic cell nuclei into a state that resembles the conditions that occur at fertilization (nuclear reprogramming). Despite the long-held assumption that reprogramming factors are present in mammalian oocytes, the molecular nature of these factors is not known. The present study demonstrates that the process of nuclear reprogramming is not directly regulated by maturation promoting factor or mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. The potential for nuclear-transferred oocytes to develop to the blastocyst stage was not different when somatic cells at the M phase were fused with oocytes activated with ionomycin and cycloheximide 1–5 h before (12%–22%) but was significantly decreased when oocytes were activated 6 h before (1%). Further molecular studies on the differences between oocytes with and without reprogramming potential are required and will be useful for the identification of reprogramming factors.

1 This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture (13308054, 14034259, 15039233) and the Program for Promotion of Basic Research Activities for Innovative Biosciences (PROBRAIN).

2 Correspondence: Yukio Tsunoda, Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, College of Agriculture, Kinki University, 3327-204, Nakamachi, Nara, 631-8505 Japan. FAX: 81 742 43 1155; tsunoda{at}nara.kindai.ac.jp




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D J Kwon, C K Park, B K Yang, and H T Cheong
Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryos
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L.-Y. Sung, P.-C. Shen, B.-S. Jeong, J. Xu, C.-C. Chang, W. T.K. Cheng, J.-S. Wu, S.-N. Lee, D. Broek, D. Faber, et al.
Premature Chromosome Condensation Is Not Essential for Nuclear Reprogramming in Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 232 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Schurmann, D. N Wells, and B. Oback
Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. Greda, J. Karasiewicz, and J. A Modlinski
Mouse zygotes as recipients in embryo cloning.
Reproduction, November 1, 2006; 132(5): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Skrzyszowska, Z. Smorag, R. Slomski, L. Katska-Ksiazkiewicz, R. Kalak, E. Michalak, K. Wielgus, J. Lehmann, D. Lipinski, M. Szalata, et al.
Generation of Transgenic Rabbits by the Novel Technique of Chimeric Somatic Cell Cloning
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2006; 74(6): 1114 - 1120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.-H. Lee and K. H.S. Campbell
Effects of Enucleation and Caffeine on Maturation-Promoting Factor (MPF) and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Activities in Ovine Oocytes Used as Recipient Cytoplasts for Nuclear Transfer
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2006; 74(4): 691 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Kawahara, T. Wakai, K.-I. Yamanaka, J. Kobayashi, S. Sugimura, T. Shimizu, H. Matsumoto, J.-H. Kim, H. Sasada, and E. Sato
Caffeine promotes premature chromosome condensation formation and in vitro development in porcine reconstructed embryos via a high level of maturation promoting factor activity during nuclear transfer
Reproduction, September 1, 2005; 130(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.