Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print August 20, 2003.
Biol Reprod 2003, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.020529
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
69/6/2100    most recent
biolreprod.103.020529v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ward, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 69, 2100–2108 (2003)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.020529
© 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Long-Term Preservation of Mouse Spermatozoa after Freeze-Drying and Freezing Without Cryoprotection1

Monika A. Ward2,4, Takehito Kaneko4, Hirokazu Kusakabe3,4, John D. Biggers5, David G. Whittingham4, and Ryuzo Yanagimachi4

Institute for Biogenesis Research,4 University of Hawaii Medical School, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Department of Cell Biology,5 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

The widespread production of mice with transgenes, disrupted genes and mutant genes, has strained the resources available for maintaining these mouse lines as live populations, and dependable methods for gamete and embryo preservation in these lines are needed. Here we report the results of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with spermatozoa freeze-dried or frozen without a cryoprotectant after storage for periods up to 1.5 years. Freeze-dried samples were stored at 4°C. Samples frozen without cryoprotection were maintained at -196°C. After storage, spermatozoa were injected into the oocytes by ICSI. Zygotic chromosomes and fetal development at Day 15 of gestation were examined after 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo of sperm storage. When fresh spermatozoa were used for ICSI, 96% of resultant zygotes contained normal chromosomes, and 58% of two-cell embryos transferred developed to normal viable fetuses. Similar results were obtained when spermatozoa were frozen without cryoprotection and then used for ICSI (87% and 45%, respectively; P > 0.05) and after 12 mo of sperm storage (mean of six endpoints examined: 87% and 52%, respectively; P > 0.05). Freeze-drying decreased the proportion of zygotes with normal karyoplates (75% vs. 96%; P < 0.001) and the proportion of embryos that developed into fetuses (35% vs. 58%; P < 0.001), but similar to freezing, there was no further deterioration during 12 mo of storage (mean of six endpoints examined: 68% and 34%, respectively; P > 0.05). Live offspring were obtained from both freeze-dried and frozen spermatozoa after storage for 1.5 yr. The results indicate that 1) the freeze-drying procedure itself causes some abnormalities in spermatozoa but freezing without cryoprotection does not and 2) long-term storage of both frozen and freeze-dried spermatozoa is not deleterious to their genetic integrity. Freezing without cryoprotection is highly successful, simple, and efficient but, like all routine sperm storage methods, requires liquid nitrogen. Liquid nitrogen is also required for freeze-drying, but sperm can then be stored at 4°C and shipped at ambient temperatures. Both preservation methods are successful, but rapid freezing without cryoprotection is the preferred method for preservation of spermatozoa from mouse strains carrying unique genes and mutations.

1 This material is based upon work done as part of the National Cooperative Program on Mouse Sperm Cryopreservation that is funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and NCRR, NIH grant U0 1HD38205. M.A.W. is also associated with the Institute of Human Genetics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

2 Correspondence: Monika A. Ward, Institute for Biogenesis Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1960 East-West Rd., Honolulu, Hawaii 96822. Monika A. Ward previously published manuscripts under the name Monika A. Szczygiel. FAX: 808 956 7316; mward{at}hawaii.edu

3 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Hokkaido 078-8510, Japan




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Kusakabe, R. Yanagimachi, and Y. Kamiguchi
Mouse and human spermatozoa can be freeze-dried without damaging their chromosomes
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, B. Doe, A. Ajduk, and M. A Ward
Genomic DNA Damage in Mouse Transgenesis
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 803 - 812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward
Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi and M. A. Ward
Preservation of Ejaculated Mouse Spermatozoa from Fertile C57BL/6 and Infertile Hook1/Hook1 Mice Collected from the Uteri of Mated Females
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2007; 76(6): 1002 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. W Li, J. D Biggers, H. Y Elmoazzen, M. Toner, L. McGinnis, and K C K. Lloyd
Long-term storage of mouse spermatozoa after evaporative drying
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 919 - 929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
Y. Kawase, T. Hani, N. Kamada, K.-i. Jishage, and H. Suzuki
Effect of pressure at primary drying of freeze-drying mouse sperm reproduction ability and preservation potential
Reproduction, April 1, 2007; 133(4): 841 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.-B. Lee and K. Niwa
Fertilization and Development In Vitro of Bovine Oocytes Following Intracytoplasmic Injection of Heat-Dried Sperm Heads
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 146 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. K. McGinnis, L. Zhu, J. A. Lawitts, S. Bhowmick, M. Toner, and J. D. Biggers
Mouse Sperm Desiccated and Stored in Trehalose Medium Without Freezing
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 627 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Kawase, H. Araya, N. Kamada, K.-i. Jishage, and H. Suzuki
Possibility of Long-Term Preservation of Freeze-Dried Mouse Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 568 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I.-K. Kwon, K.-E. Park, and K. Niwa
Activation, Pronuclear Formation, and Development In Vitro of Pig Oocytes Following Intracytoplasmic Injection of Freeze-Dried Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1430 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.