Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print February 25, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025171
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
70/6/1863    most recent
biolreprod.103.025171v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kishigami, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wakayama, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kishigami, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wakayama, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kishigami, S.
Right arrow Articles by Wakayama, T.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 70, 1863–1869 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.025171
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Male Reproductive Tract

Similar Time Restriction for Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection and Round Spermatid Injection into Activated Oocytes for Efficient Offspring Production1

Satoshi Kishigami2, Sayaka Wakayama, Nguyen Van Thuan, and Teruhiko Wakayama

Laboratory for Genome Reprogramming, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan

The injection of male haploid germ cells, such as spermatozoa and round spermatids, into preactivated mouse oocytes can result in the development of viable embryos and offspring. However, it is not clear how the timing of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and round spermatid injection (ROSI) affects the production of offspring. We carried out ICSI and ROSI every 20 min for up to 4 h after the activation of mouse oocytes by Sr2+ and compared the late-stage development of ICSI- and ROSI- treated oocytes, including the formation of pronuclei, blastocyst formation, and offspring production. The rate of pronucleus formation (RPF) after carrying out ICSI started to decrease from >95% at 100 min following oocyte activation and declined to <20% by 180 min. In comparison, RPF by ROSI decreased gradually from >70% between 0 and 4 h after activation. The RPFs were closely correlated with blastocyst formation. Offspring production for both ICSI and ROSI decreased significantly when injections were conducted after 100 min, a time at which activated oocytes were in the early G1 stage of the cell cycle. These results suggest that spermatozoa and round spermatids have different potentials for inducing the formation of a male pronucleus in activated oocytes, but ICSI and ROSI are both subject to the same time constraint for the efficient production of offspring, which is determined by the cell cycle of the activated oocyte.

1 Supported by grants-in-aid for Creative Scientific Research (13GS0008) and to Young Scientists (A) (15681014) to T.W. from MEXT, Japan.

2 Correspondence: Satoshi Kishigami, RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology, 2-2-3, Minatojima Minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650- 0047, Japan. FAX: 81 78 306 3095; kishigami{at}cdb.riken.jp




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J BiochemHome page
K. Yamagata
Capturing Epigenetic Dynamics During Pre-implantation Development Using Live Cell Imaging
J. Biochem., March 1, 2008; 143(3): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. Loren and O. Lacham-Kaplan
The employment of strontium to activate mouse oocytes: effects on spermatid-injection outcome
Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 259 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.