Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print March 3, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/1/185    most recent
biolreprod.103.026559v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaujean, N.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaujean, N.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Beaujean, N.
Right arrow Articles by Young, L.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 185–193 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.026559
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Reproductive Technology

Effect of Limited DNA Methylation Reprogramming in the Normal Sheep Embryo on Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1

Nathalie Beaujean3,4,5, Jane Taylor4, John Gardner4, Ian Wilmut4, Richard Meehan5,6, and Lorraine Young2,4

Division of Gene Expression and Development,4 Roslin Institute, Roslin EH25 9PS, United Kingdom Department of Biomedical and Clinical Laboratory Sciences,5 University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9XD, United Kingdom Human Genetics Unit,6 MRC, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom

Active demethylation of cytosine residues in the sperm genome before forming a functional zygotic nucleus is thought to be an important function of the oocyte cytoplasm for subsequent embryonic development in the mouse. Conversely, this event does not occur in the sheep or rabbit zygote and occurs only partially in the cow. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of limited methylation reprogramming in the normal sheep embryo on reprogramming somatic nuclei. Sheep fibroblast somatic nuclei were partially demethylated after electrofusion with recipient sheep oocytes and undergo a stepwise passive loss of DNA methylation during early development, as determined by 5-methylcytosine immunostaining on interphase embryonic nuclei. A similar decrease takes place with in vivo-derived sheep embryos up to the eight-cell stage, although nuclear transfer embryos exhibit a consistently higher level of methylation at each stage. Between the eight-cell and blastocyst stages, DNA methylation levels in nuclear transfer embryos are comparable with those derived in vivo, but the distribution of methylated DNA is abnormal in a high proportion. By correlating DNA methylation with developmental potential at individual stages, our results suggest that somatic nuclei that do not undergo rapid reorganization of their DNA before the first mitosis fail to develop within two to three cell cycles and that the observed methylation defects in early cleavage stages more likely occur as a direct consequence of failed nuclear reorganization than in failed demethylation capacity. However, because only embryos with reorganized chromatin appear to survive the 16-cell and morula stages, failure to demethylate the trophectoderm cells of the blastocyst is likely to directly impact on developmental potential by altering programmed patterns of gene expression in extra–embryonic tissues. Thus, both remodeling of DNA and epigenetic reprogramming appear critical for development of both fertilized and nuclear transfer embryos.

1 Supported by BBSRC grants GTH14114/5.

2 Correspondence and current address: Lorraine Young, Institute of Genetics and Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. FAX: 44 0115 970 9234; lorraine.young{at}notthingham.ac.uk

3 Current address: Biologie du Développement et Reproduction, INRA/ ENVA UMR 1198, Domaine de Vilvert, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas cedex, France




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D J Kwon, C K Park, B K Yang, and H T Cheong
Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryos
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Giraldo, D. A. Hylan, C. B. Ballard, M. N. Purpera, T. D. Vaught, J. W. Lynn, R. A. Godke, and K. R. Bondioli
Effect of Epigenetic Modifications of Donor Somatic Cells on the Subsequent Chromatin Remodeling of Cloned Bovine Embryos
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 832 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. H. Shi, J. S. Ai, Y. C. OuYang, J. C. Huang, Z. L. Lei, Q. Wang, S. Yin, Z. M. Han, Q. Y. Sun, and D. Y. Chen
Trichostatin A and nuclear reprogramming of cloned rabbit embryos
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1106 - 1113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Fulka, I. Barnetova, T. Mosko, and J. Fulka
Epigenetic analysis of human spermatozoa after their injection into ovulated mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 627 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
K. Yamagata
Capturing Epigenetic Dynamics During Pre-implantation Development Using Live Cell Imaging
J. Biochem., March 1, 2008; 143(3): 279 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Niemann, X C. Tian, W A. King, and R. S F Lee
Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 151 - 163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
F. Yang, R. Hao, B. Kessler, G. Brem, E. Wolf, and V. Zakhartchenko
Rabbit somatic cell cloning: effects of donor cell type, histone acetylation status and chimeric embryo complementation
Reproduction, January 1, 2007; 133(1): 219 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Yang, S. Yang, N. Beaujean, Y. Niu, X. He, Y. Xie, X. Tang, L. Wang, Q. Zhou, and W. Ji
Epigenetic Marks in Cloned Rhesus Monkey Embryos: Comparison with Counterparts Produced In Vitro
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2007; 76(1): 36 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. Suteevun, R. Parnpai, S. L. Smith, C-C. Chang, S. Muenthaisong, and X. C. Tian
Epigenetic characteristics of cloned and in vitro-fertilized swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2006; 84(8): 2065 - 2071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
N Cobbe
Why the apparent haste to clone humans?
J. Med. Ethics, May 1, 2006; 32(5): 298 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. C. Ribas, J. E. Taylor, C. McCorquodale, A. C. Mauricio, M. Sousa, and I. Wilmut
Effect of Zona Pellucida Removal on DNA Methylation in Early Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2006; 74(2): 307 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Gioia, B. Barboni, M. Turriani, G. Capacchietti, M. G. Pistilli, P. Berardinelli, and M. Mattioli
The capability of reprogramming the male chromatin after fertilization is dependent on the quality of oocyte maturation
Reproduction, July 1, 2005; 130(1): 29 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
H. D. Morgan, F. Santos, K. Green, W. Dean, and W. Reik
Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2005; 14(suppl_1): R47 - R58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Fulka, M. Mrazek, O. Tepla, and J. Fulka Jr
DNA methylation pattern in human zygotes and developing embryos
Reproduction, December 1, 2004; 128(6): 703 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.