Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print March 17, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.027615
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
71/1/224    most recent
biolreprod.104.027615v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by McNeilly, A.S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by McNeilly, A.S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Crawford, J.L.
Right arrow Articles by McNeilly, A.S.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 71, 224–235 (2004)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.027615
© 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Pituitary

No Evidence for Pituitary Priming to Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Relation to Luteinizing Hormone (LH) Secretion Prior to the Preovulatory LH Surge in Ewes1

J.L. Crawford2, J.R. McNeilly, and A.S. McNeilly

Human Reproductive Sciences Unit, Medical Research Council, University of Edinburgh Centre for Reproductive Biology, Edinburgh EH16 4SB, United Kingdom

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of and the regulatory mechanisms involved in priming of the pituitary to GnRH before the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Experiment 1: Forty-two ewes had progestagen devices removed after 14 days and were assigned to luteal (Lut) or follicular (Foll) groups. Fifteen days later, blood sampling was initiated either immediately or 36 h after induced luteolysis in groups Lut and Foll, respectively. After 4 h, ewes were administered either saline (n = 5) or 250 ng (n = 8) or 10 µg (n = 8) of GnRH. Five ewes per treatment group were killed 1 h later, while remaining animals were blood sampled for a further 7 h. Experiment 2: Eighteen ewes were allocated to Lut and Foll groups (described above). Blood samples were collected from 2 h before GnRH (10 µg) treatment until 7 h after. Despite up-regulated GnRH-R mRNA levels in Foll ewes, pituitary content and plasma levels of LH and LHß mRNA levels were similar between groups. Mean FSHß mRNA and plasma FSH levels were elevated in Lut ewes but declined after GnRH treatment. Inversely, plasma estradiol and inhibin-A concentrations were higher in Foll ewes and declined after GnRH treatment. Fewer LH+ve/secretogranin II–ve (SgII–ve) granules were present in gonadotropes of Foll ewes, coincident with increased basal LH levels. Fewer smaller sized granules were present after GnRH treatment. In conclusion, there was no evidence of self-priming before onset of the preovulatory LH surge. Constitutive release of LH+ve/SgII–ve granules may maintain basal LH levels while smaller sized, presumably mature granules may be preferentially released after GnRH stimulation.

1 Supported by a postdoctoral fellowship to J.L.C. from the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility Ltd./Society for Reproduction and Fertility.

2 Correspondence and current address: J.L. Crawford, Reproductive Technologies Group, AgResearch Ltd., Wallaceville Animal Research Centre, Ward Street, P.O. Box 40063, Upper Hutt, New Zealand. FAX: 64 4 922 1380; janet.crawford{at}agresearch.co.nz




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P. A. Fowler, N. J. Dora, H. McFerran, M. R. Amezaga, D. W. Miller, R. G. Lea, P. Cash, A. S. McNeilly, N. P. Evans, C. Cotinot, et al.
In utero exposure to low doses of environmental pollutants disrupts fetal ovarian development in sheep
Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 14(5): 269 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.