|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Embryo |
Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, Pennsylvania 19348
The POU-domain transcription factor Pou5f1 (Oct4) is restricted to pluripotent embryonic cells and the germ line of the mouse and is required for the maintenance of pluripotency of cells within the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst. Despite highly conserved genomic organization and regulatory regions between the mouse Oct4 gene and its bovine orthologue, bovine Oct4 protein is not restricted to the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage embryos, suggesting that Oct4 may not be a key regulator of pluripotency in the bovine. We analyze the temporal and spatial distribution of Oct4 transcript in bovine oocytes and preimplantation-stage embryos, and in contrast to protein distribution, we find strong conservation between bovine and mouse. Oct4 transcript is present at low levels in the bovine oocyte. Similar to mouse, bovine Oct4 transcription begins one to two cell cycles after zygotic genome activation, followed by a sharp increase in transcription subsequent to compaction. Oct4 transcript is ubiquitously present in all cells of embryos at the morula stage; however, in Day 7 bovine blastocysts, Oct4 signal is not visible in the trophectoderm by in situ hybridization, indicating that transcriptional downregulation of Oct4 on differentiation is similar to that observed in mouse and other mammals. These results indicate that in contrast to protein distribution, regulation of Oct4 transcription is conserved between mammalian species.
2 Correspondence: K. John McLaughlin, Center for Animal Transgenesis and Germ Cell Research, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA 19348. FAX: 610 925 8121; kjmclaug{at}vet.upenn.edu
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Blomberg, K. Hashizume, and C. Viebahn Blastocyst elongation, trophoblastic differentiation, and embryonic pattern formation Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 181 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Wuensch, F. A. Habermann, S. Kurosaka, R. Klose, V. Zakhartchenko, H.-D. Reichenbach, F. Sinowatz, K. J. McLaughlin, and E. Wolf Quantitative Monitoring of Pluripotency Gene Activation after Somatic Cloning in Cattle Biol Reprod, June 1, 2007; 76(6): 983 - 991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Misica-Turner, F. C. Oback, M. Eichenlaub, D. N. Wells, and B. Oback Aggregating Embryonic but Not Somatic Nuclear Transfer Embryos Increases Cloning Efficiency in Cattle Biol Reprod, February 1, 2007; 76(2): 268 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cauffman, H. Van de Velde, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Oct-4 mRNA and protein expression during human preimplantation development Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 11(3): 173 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |