Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 27, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.035691
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/3/619    most recent
biolreprod.104.035691v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Unsworth, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. E.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 72, 619–627 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.035691
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Prenatal Programming of Reproductive Neuroendocrine Function: The Effect of Prenatal Androgens on the Development of Estrogen Positive Feedback and Ovarian Cycles in the Ewe1

William P. Unsworth, James A. Taylor, and Jane E. Robinson2

Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom

Exposure of the female ovine fetus to male hormones during a sensitive window of in utero life causes disruption to reproductive function. In some animals, androgen exposure completely abolishes reproductive cycles, but in others, cycles are progressively lost with age. The present study tested two predictions: that noncycling, androgenized animals are unable to respond to estrogen with a preovulatory-like surge of LH (estrogen positive feedback), and that the androgenized animals that exhibit a progressive loss of cycles also show a progressive loss of estrogen positive feedback. Androgenized ewes were generated by injection of their mothers with testosterone propionate twice per week from Day 30 to Day 90 of pregnancy (term, 147 days). Control ewes received no injections. Whether ewes could exhibit estrogen positive feedback was tested on five occasions before puberty (30 wk) and once during the anestrous period. All control animals had repeated reproductive cycles in both the first and second breeding season, and all showed robust LH surges during test periods. Despite the fact that 64% of androgenized animals showed reproductive cycles, estrogen positive feedback could be demonstrated in only 6.1% of trials. Subsequent experiments revealed that the lack of response to estrogen in androgenized animals was not because of pituitary insensitivity to GnRH, a requirement for higher concentrations of estrogen, or a surge that was delayed relative to the time of estrogen administration. The mechanisms by which some androgenized ewes can produce normal reproductive cycles in the apparent absence of estrogen positive feedback are currently unknown.

1 Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and a BBSRC Special Committee Studentship to W.P.U.

2 Correspondence: Jane E. Robinson, Division of Cell Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland. j.robinson{at}vet.gla.ac.uk






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.