HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 72/3/619    most recent biolreprod.104.035691v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Unsworth, W. P. Articles by Robinson, J. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Unsworth, W. P. Articles by Robinson, J. E. Agricola Articles by Unsworth, W. P. Articles by Robinson, J. E.

Prenatal Programming of Reproductive Neuroendocrine Function: The Effect of Prenatal Androgens on the Development of Estrogen Positive Feedback and Ovarian Cycles in the Ewe¹

Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, Department of Neurobiology, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, United Kingdom

Exposure of the female ovine fetus to male hormones during a sensitive window of in utero life causes disruption to reproductive function. In some animals, androgen exposure completely abolishes reproductive cycles, but in others, cycles are progressively lost with age. The present study tested two predictions: that noncycling, androgenized animals are unable to respond to estrogen with a preovulatory-like surge of LH (estrogen positive feedback), and that the androgenized animals that exhibit a progressive loss of cycles also show a progressive loss of estrogen positive feedback. Androgenized ewes were generated by injection of their mothers with testosterone propionate twice per week from Day 30 to Day 90 of pregnancy (term, 147 days). Control ewes received no injections. Whether ewes could exhibit estrogen positive feedback was tested on five occasions before puberty (30 wk) and once during the anestrous period. All control animals had repeated reproductive cycles in both the first and second breeding season, and all showed robust LH surges during test periods. Despite the fact that 64% of androgenized animals showed reproductive cycles, estrogen positive feedback could be demonstrated in only 6.1% of trials. Subsequent experiments revealed that the lack of response to estrogen in androgenized animals was not because of pituitary insensitivity to GnRH, a requirement for higher concentrations of estrogen, or a surge that was delayed relative to the time of estrogen administration. The mechanisms by which some androgenized ewes can produce normal reproductive cycles in the apparent absence of estrogen positive feedback are currently unknown.

¹ Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and a BBSRC Special Committee Studentship to W.P.U.

² Correspondence: Jane E. Robinson, Division of Cell Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Bearsden Road, Glasgow G61 1QH, Scotland. j.robinson{at}vet.gla.ac.uk

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Veiga-Lopez, O. I. Astapova, E. F. Aizenberg, J. S. Lee, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Contribution of Prenatal Androgen and Estrogen to Estradiol Feedback Systems and Periovulatory Hormonal Dynamics in Sheep Biol Reprod, April 1, 2009; 80(4): 718 - 725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Jackson, K. M. Timmer, and D. L. Foster Sexual Differentiation of the External Genitalia and the Timing of Puberty in the Presence of an Antiandrogen in Sheep Endocrinology, August 1, 2008; 149(8): 4200 - 4208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Veiga-Lopez, W. Ye, D.J. Phillips, C. Herkimer, P.G. Knight, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Deficits in Reproductive Hormone Dynamics and Ovulatory Outcomes in Prenatal, Testosterone-Treated Sheep Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 636 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Roselli, H. Stadelman, R. Reeve, C. V. Bishop, and F. Stormshak The Ovine Sexually Dimorphic Nucleus of the Medial Preoptic Area Is Organized Prenatally by Testosterone Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4450 - 4457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Steckler, M. Manikkam, E. K. Inskeep, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Follicular Persistence in Prenatal Testosterone-Treated Sheep Is Not Programmed by Androgenic Actions of Testosterone Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3532 - 3540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A Forsdike, K. Hardy, L. Bull, J. Stark, L. J Webber, S. Stubbs, J. E Robinson, and S. Franks Disordered follicle development in ovaries of prenatally androgenized ewes J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 192(2): 421 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Savabieasfahani, K. Kannan, O. Astapova, N. P. Evans, and V. Padmanabhan Developmental Programming: Differential Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Bisphenol-A or Methoxychlor on Reproductive Function Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 5956 - 5966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Robinson Prenatal programming of the female reproductive neuroendocrine system by androgens. Reproduction, October 1, 2006; 132(4): 539 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Manikkam, T. L. Steckler, K. B. Welch, E. K. Inskeep, and V. Padmanabhan Fetal Programming: Prenatal Testosterone Treatment Leads to Follicular Persistence/Luteal Defects; Partial Restoration of Ovarian Function by Cyclic Progesterone Treatment Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1997 - 2007. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Steckler, J. Wang, F. F. Bartol, S. K. Roy, and V. Padmanabhan Fetal Programming: Prenatal Testosterone Treatment Causes Intrauterine Growth Retardation, Reduces Ovarian Reserve and Increases Ovarian Follicular Recruitment Endocrinology, July 1, 2005; 146(7): 3185 - 3193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]