Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print November 10, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034736
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/3/633    most recent
biolreprod.104.034736v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choudhary, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flores, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choudhary, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flores, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Choudhary, E.
Right arrow Articles by Flores, J. A.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 72, 633–642 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034736
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Developmental Sensitivity of the Bovine Corpus Luteum to Prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}) and Endothelin-1 (ET-1): Is ET-1 a Mediator of the Luteolytic Actions of PGF2{alpha} or a Tonic Inhibitor of Progesterone Secretion?1

Ekta Choudhary3, Aritro Sen3, E. Keith Inskeep4, and Jorge A. Flores2,3

Department of Biology,3 Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6057 Division of Animal and Veterinary Sciences,4 College of Agriculture, Forestry and Consumer Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-6057

We examined the responsiveness of large luteal cells (LLC), small luteal cells (SLC), and endothelial cells of the Day 4 and Day 10 bovine corpus luteum (CL) to prostaglandin (PG) F2{alpha} and endothelin (ET)-1. Using a single-cell approach, we tested the ability of each agonist to increase the cytoplasmic concentration of calcium ions ([Ca2+]i) as function of luteal development. All tested concentrations of agonists significantly (P = 0.05) increased [Ca2+]i in all cell populations isolated from Day 4 and Day 10 CL. Day 10 steroidogenic cells were more responsive than Day 4 cells to PGF2{alpha} and ET-1. Response amplitudes and number of responding cells were affected significantly by agonist concentration, luteal development, and cell type. Response amplitudes were greater in LLC than in SLC; responses of maximal amplitude were elicited with lower agonist concentrations in Day 10 cells than in Day 4 cells. Furthermore, on Day 10, as the concentration of PGF2{alpha} increased, larger percentages of SLC responded. Endothelial cells responded maximally, regardless of agonist concentration and luteal development. In experiment 2, we tested the developmental responsiveness of total dispersed and steroidogenic-enriched cells to the inhibitory actions of PGF2{alpha} and ET-1 on basal and LH-stimulated progesterone accumulation. The potency of PGF2{alpha} steroidogenic-enriched cells on Day 4 was lower than on Day 10; in contrast, the potency of ET-1 was not different. Therefore, ET-1 was a tonic inhibitor of progesterone accumulation rather than a mediator of PGF2{alpha} action. The lower efficacy of PGF2{alpha} in the early CL more likely is related to signal transduction differences associated with its receptor at these two developmental stages than to the inability of PGF2{alpha} to up-regulate ET-1.

1 Supported in part by USDA/CREES award 2002-35203-12230 to E.K.I. and J.A.F.

2 Correspondence: Jorge A. Flores, Department of Biology, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6057, Morgantown, WV 26506-6057. FAX: 304 293 6363; jflores{at}wvu.edu




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. D. Doerr, M. P. Goravanahally, J. D. Rhinehart, E. K. Inskeep, and J. A. Flores
Effects of Endothelin Receptor Type-A and Type-B Antagonists on Prostaglandin F2alpha-Induced Luteolysis of the Sheep Corpus Luteum
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 688 - 696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Boiti, M. Maranesi, C. Dall'Aglio, L. Pascucci, G. Brecchia, A. Gobbetti, and M. Zerani
Vasoactive Peptides in the Luteolytic Process Activated by PGF2alpha in Pseudopregnant Rabbits at Different Luteal Stages
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 156 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.