Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print December 1, 2004.
Biol Reprod 2004, 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034876
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
72/4/872    most recent
biolreprod.104.034876v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kimber, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kimber, S. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, G.
Right arrow Articles by Kimber, S. J.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 72, 872–878 (2005)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034876
© 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Leukocyte Subpopulations in the Uteri of Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Knockout Mice During Early Pregnancy1

Gemma Schofield3,, and Susan J. Kimber2,

Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) is transiently expressed on Day (D) 1 of pregnancy by the uterine epithelium and on D4 specifically by the glandular epithelium. The Lif knockout female mice are infertile because of uterine defects that affect embryo implantation, but pregnancy can be rescued in these mice by injections of LIF on D4 of pregnancy. Many of the specific actions of LIF in the uterus are unknown, especially with regard to uterine cell biology. Leukocytes, such as macrophages, natural killer (NK) cells, and eosinophils, are present in the pregnant uterus and are thought to be beneficial, because alterations in their proportions can adversely affect pregnancy. Immunocytochemistry and cell counting were used to compare the distributions and dynamics of leukocyte subpopulations in wild-type and Lif knockout mice. The percentage of macrophages was reduced by more than half in the Lif knockout mice on D3 of pregnancy, and their distribution was disrupted, suggesting that LIF is a chemokine for these cells. The NK cells were detected as early as D3 of pregnancy, but the Lif knockout mice had double the percentage of NK cells compared to wild-type mice at this time, indicating that LIF restricts the migration of NK cells to the uterus. The Lif knockout mice also had significantly higher percentages of eosinophils in the outer stroma on D3, and in the midstroma on D4, of pregnancy, suggesting that LIF also may restrict eosinophil migration to the uterus. These alterations of the uterine leukocyte subpopulations in Lif knockout mice may disrupt pregnancy and contribute to failure of implantation.

1 Supported by a studentship from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK and a BBSRC grant to S.J.K.

2 Correspondence: Susan J. Kimber, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, 3.239 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, U.K. FAX: 0161 275 3915; sue.kimber{at}man.ac.uk

3 Current address: Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
M. S. M. van Mourik, N. S. Macklon, and C. J. Heijnen
Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment
J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2009; 85(1): 4 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
D. W. Agnew, L. B. Corbeil, L. Munson, B. A. Byrne, and R. H. BonDurant
A Pregnant Mouse Model for Bovine Tritrichomonas foetus Infection
Vet. Pathol., November 1, 2008; 45(6): 849 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.A Fouladi-Nashta, L Mohamet, J.K Heath, and S.J Kimber
Interleukin 1 Signaling Is Regulated by Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) and Is Aberrant in Lif-/- Mouse Uterus
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2008; 79(1): 142 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. V. Ingman and R. L. Jones
Cytokine knockouts in reproduction: the use of gene ablation to dissect roles of cytokines in reproductive biology
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 179 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tonello and G. Poli
Tubal ectopic pregnancy: macrophages under the microscope
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2577 - 2584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Brief Funct Genomic ProteomicHome page
I. Barbaric, G. Miller, and T. N. Dear
Appearances can be deceiving: phenotypes of knockout mice
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic, June 20, 2007; (2007) elm008v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H. Song and H. Lim
Evidence for heterodimeric association of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) receptor and gp130 in the mouse uterus for LIF signaling during blastocyst implantation
Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E. Dimitriadis, C.A. White, R.L. Jones, and L.A. Salamonsen
Cytokines, chemokines and growth factors in endometrium related to implantation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 613 - 630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. J Kimber
Leukaemia inhibitory factor in implantation and uterine biology
Reproduction, August 1, 2005; 130(2): 131 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.