Biol Reprod Lalor Postdoctoral Fellowships -- Application Deadline January 15, 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print October 12, 2005.
Biol Reprod 2005, 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046235
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
74/2/288    most recent
biolreprod.105.046235v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Biol Reprod
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zander, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zander, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zander, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, M.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 74, 288–294 (2006)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.105.046235
© 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Research Article

Perturbations in Mouse Embryo Development and Viability Caused by Ammonium Are More Severe after Exposure at the Cleavage Stages1

Deirdre L. Zander 3, Jeremy G. Thompson 3, and Michelle Lane 2 34 

Research Centre for Reproductive Health,3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia Repromed,4 Dulwich, South Australia 5065, Australia

ABSTRACT

The presence of ammonium in culture medium has a detrimental effect on embryo physiology and biochemistry; however, the stage at which the embryo is most sensitive to this effect is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the exact stage at which the embryo is most vulnerable to ammonium by exposing the preimplantation embryo to 300 µM ammonium either at the precompaction stage (between the zygote and two-cell or the two-cell to eight-cell) or at the postcompaction stage (between the eight-cell and blastocyst). This study determined that exposure of embryos to ammonium at the precompaction stage from either the zygote to two-cell stage or from the two-cell to the eight-cell stage did not affect the rate of development to the blastocyst stage; however, the resultant blastocysts had decreased cell numbers and inner cell mass cells. Furthermore, these blastocysts had increased levels of cellular apoptosis and perturbed levels of Slc2a3 expression and glucose uptake. Transfer of these blastocysts revealed that, while implantation was not affected, the number of fetuses was reduced by culture with ammonium at the precompaction stage and fetal development was delayed, as observed by reduced crown-rump length and maturity. In contrast, the later stage embryo was more resistant to the negative effects of ammonium, with only Slc2a3 expression and fetal maturity affected. This raises the possibility that the later stage embryo is more able to protect itself from in vitro-derived stress and that the majority of in vitro-induced damage to mouse embryos is inflicted at the early stages of development.

assisted reproductive technology, early development, embryo, gene regulation, in vitro fertilization


FOOTNOTES

1 Supported by the Australian NHMRC project grant 299037. D.L.Z. is a recipient of a TQEH postgraduate scholarship, J.G.T. a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship, and M.L. is a recipient of a R.D. Wright Fellowship from the NHMRC.

2 Correspondence: Michelle Lane, Research Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Level 4, Maternity Building, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville Road, Woodville, South Australia 5011, Australia. FAX: 61 8 8222 7521; michelle.lane{at}adelaide.edu.au


Related articles in Biol Reprod:

Highlights
John Eppig and Mary Ann Handel
Biol Reprod 2006 74: 217. [Full Text]  






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.