Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


BOR - Papers in Press, published online ahead of print November 15, 2006.
Biol Reprod 2006, 10.1095/biolreprod.106.053561
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
76/2/232    most recent
biolreprod.106.053561v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sung, L.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Du, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sung, L.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Du, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sung, L.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Du, F.
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION 76, 232–240 (2007)
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.106.053561
© 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


research-article

Premature Chromosome Condensation Is Not Essential for Nuclear Reprogramming in Bovine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer1

Li-Ying Sung 3 4, Perng-Chih Shen 3 5, B.-Seon Jeong 4, Jie Xu 6, Ching-Chien Chang 4, Winston T.K. Cheng 7, Jiin-Shyan Wu 8, Shan-Nan Lee 8, Diane Broek 9, David Faber 9, X. Cindy Tian 4, Xiangzhong Yang 4, and Fuliang Du 2 4 6

Department of Animal Science/Center for Regenerative Biology,4 University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269 Department of Animal Science,5 National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan Evergen Biotechnologies, Inc.,6 Storrs, Connecticut 06269 Department of Animal Science,7 National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan Taiwan Livestock Research Institute,8 Hsin-hua, Tainan 71210, Taiwan Trans Ova Genetics,9 Sioux Center, Iowa 51250

ABSTRACT

Premature chromosome condensation (PCC) was believed to promote nuclear reprogramming and to facilitate cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT) in mammalian species. However, it is still uncertain whether PCC is necessary for the successful reprogramming of an introduced donor nucleus in cattle. In the present study, fused NT embryos were subjected to immediate activation (IA, simultaneous fusion and activation), delayed activation (DA, activation applied 4 h postfusion), and IA with aged oocytes (IAA, activation at the same oocyte age as group DA). The morphologic changes, such as nuclear swelling, the occurrence of PCC, and microtubule/aster formation, were analyzed in detail by laser-scanning confocal microscopy. When embryos were subjected to IA in both IA and IAA groups, the introduced nucleus gradually became swollen, and a pronuclear-like structure formed within the oocyte, but PCC was not observed. In contrast, delaying embryo activation resulted in 46.5%–91.2% of NT embryos exhibiting PCC. This PCC was observed beginning at 4 h postcell fusion and was shown as one, two, or multiple chromosomal complexes. Subsequently, a diversity of pronuclear-like structures existed in NT embryos, characterized as single, double, and multiple nuclei. In the oocytes exhibiting PCC, the assembled spindle structure was observed to be an interactive mass, closely associated with condensed chromosomes, but no aster had formed. Regardless of whether they were subjected to IA, IAA, or DA treatments, if the oocytes contained pronuclear-like structures, either one or two asters were observed in proximity to the nuclei. A significantly higher rate of development to blastocysts was achieved in embryos that were immediately activated (IA, 59.1%; IAA, 40.7%) than in those for which activation was delayed (14.2%). The development rate was higher in group IA than in group IAA, but it was not significant (P = 0.089). Following embryo transfer, there was no statistically significant difference in the pregnancy rates (Day 70) between two of the groups (group IA, 11.7%, n = 94 vs. group DA, 12.3%, n = 130; P > 0.05) or live term development (group IA, 4.3% vs. group DA, 4.6%; P > 0.05). Our study has demonstrated that the IA of bovine NT embryos results in embryos with increased competence for preimplantational development. Moreover, PCC was shown to be unnecessary for the reprogramming of a transplanted somatic genome in a cattle oocyte.

conceptus, embryo, gamete biology, implantation, pregnancy


FOOTNOTES

3These authors contributed equally to this work.

1Supported in part by the Research Fund from Evergen Biotechnologies, Inc., Storrs, Connecticut, awarded to F.D., a Yankee Ingenuity grant from Connecticut Innovation, Inc., Connecticut, awarded to X.Y., and a Livestock Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Taiwan grant to S.N.L.

Correspondence: 2Fuliang Du, Evergen Biotechnologies, Inc., 1392 Storrs Rd., Unit 4213, Room 106, Storrs, CT 06269. FAX: 860 486 6628; e-mail: fuliangd{at}evergen.com




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D J Kwon, C K Park, B K Yang, and H T Cheong
Control of nuclear remodelling and subsequent in vitro development and methylation status of porcine nuclear transfer embryos
Reproduction, May 1, 2008; 135(5): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Ooga, A. Inoue, S.-i. Kageyama, T. Akiyama, M. Nagata, and F. Aoki
Changes in H3K79 Methylation During Preimplantation Development in Mice
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2008; 78(3): 413 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.M. Mitalipov, Q. Zhou, J.A. Byrne, W.Z. Ji, R.B. Norgren, and D.P. Wolf
Reprogramming following somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates is dependent upon nuclear remodeling
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2232 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.