|
|
||||||||
a Program in Molecular Biology and Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Loyola University, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois 60153
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the adult, selective regulation of FSH without changes in LH are due, in part, to an activin regulatory system consisting of activin and its receptor as well as follistatin. Activin is a gonadal peptide hormone and a member of the transforming growth factor family. The activin hormone is composed of two inhibin ß subunits termed ßA and ßB. The subunits heterodimerize or homodimerize to form activin A (ßA-ßA), activin AB (ßB-ßA), or activin B (ßB-ßB) [3]. Follistatin, which was first isolated from ovarian follicular fluid, also inhibits FSH secretion [3]. Both activin and follistatin are locally produced in the pituitary, as well as in the ovary, of the female rat, making them potential paracrine effectors of FSH synthesis and secretion [4, 5].
At the surface of target cells, activin binds to a dimeric receptor complex similar to the transforming growth factor family of receptors (for review see [6]). The receptor complex consists of a type I and a type II serine/threonine kinase receptor. Both forms are necessary for proper signaling following activin binding. In the rat, there are multiple forms of both type I and type II activin receptors. There are two subtypes of the type II receptors, Act RII and Act RIIB. The primary type II receptor is thought to be Act RII, although it has not been definitively shown in the developing pituitary.
Both activin and follistatin have been shown to be produced in gonadotrophs of adult female rat pituitary as well as in other pituitary cell types [7, 8]. Activin receptor mRNA expression has also been demonstrated in the pituitary by in situ hybridization [9]. To date, the distribution of the individual receptors in specific cell types within the anterior pituitary has not been determined. However, since both the ligand and the receptors are expressed in the pituitary, the possibility that they act in a paracrine or autocrine fashion to locally regulate FSH exists [10, 11].
At present, no studies have described the expression of activin, follistatin, or activin receptor mRNAs in the pituitary gland of the prepubertal rat. In the mouse ovary, however, activin subunits are expressed early in postnatal life [12]. Whether or not this ovarian expression results in physiologically relevant changes in circulating levels of activin remains to be determined. Ovariectomy of rats during early infantile life does not consistently result in changes in levels of circulating FSH or FSH-ß mRNA [13, 14], suggesting that ovarian-derived activin may not play a major role in the regulation of FSH during this time.
We have hypothesized that locally produced activin and/or follistatin may play a role in the selective increase in FSH-ß mRNA levels at this time. To begin to investigate this possibility, here we describe the ontogeny of activin subunits, follistatin, and activin receptor type II mRNAs, as well as the distribution of activin type II receptor subunit mRNAs, within gonadotrophs of the infantile female rat pituitary. Because activin subunits have previously been shown to be expressed in gonadotrophs, we measured their expression in the anterior pituitary by semiquantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), whereas we determined the cellular distribution and level of expression of the activin receptor subtypes by in situ hybridization.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pregnant dams were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Portage, MI) and delivered to the animal facilities at Loyola University when 1 wk pregnant. The day of birth was designated PND 0. On PND 1, litters were culled to 10 (mixed-sex). Pups were killed on PND 8, 10, 12, 15, and 21, and on each of these days, pups were selected from different litters so that multiple litters would be represented for each time point. Pituitaries were removed and frozen immediately on dry ice and stored at -70°C. For some studies, animals were anesthetized with ether and killed by perfusion with saline followed by 4% buffered paraformaldehyde (pH 7.0). This tissue was stored in a 30% sucrose solution at 4°C. Adult pituitaries were collected in a similar manner. Since activin subunit mRNA expression does not vary greatly in the pituitaries of adult female rats across the estrous cycle, and follistatin mRNA is at basal levels at diestrus [15], diestrous adult females were selected for comparison of their levels to infantile levels of ßA, ßB, and follistatin mRNA.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from frozen pituitaries using guanidium isothiocyanate by a method previously described [16]. One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed using an oligo dT(1215) primer and Superscript RT (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) in a final reaction volume of 20 µl. Two microliters of the cDNA was then amplified by PCR in the presence of 2 µCi [32P]dCTP as previously described [16] using primers specific for the ßA, ßB, or follistatin genes [17]. Reaction products were analyzed by nondenaturing PAGE and dried, and the amount of radioactivity in the reaction products was counted using a betascope (Betagen, Waltham, MA). To control for loading differences, samples were normalized to the control histone 3.3 gene from the same sample as previously described [16].
In Situ Hybridization
In situ hybridization for activin receptor mRNAs was performed by methods previously described [18]. For the activin receptor subtypes, an antisense cRNA probe was generated by in vitro transcription of a specific PCR fragment that contained an SP6 promoter on the 3' end. The 5' end contained a T7 promoter so that sense strand probes could also be generated. These promoters were added by PCR with receptor-specific primers that contained an eight-base pair overhang complementary to the primers containing the promoters [2]. The primers used to generate the cDNAs were previously published: Act RII [19] and Act RIIB [20]. The Act RII probe recognizes the intracellular domain. The Act RIIB probe hybridizes to the kinase domain common to all four potential RIIB isoforms. Pituitaries were sectioned at 20 µm on a Leitz (Wetzlar, Germany) cryostat and mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Tissue was acetylated with 0.25% acetic anhydride. Tissue was then dehydrated in graded alcohols, air dried, and hybridized in hybridization solution (50% formamide, 0.60 M NaCl, 0.02 M Tris, 0.01 M EDTA, 10% dextran sulfate, double-strength Denhardt's, 50 mM dithiothreitol, 0.2% SDS, 100 mg/ml salmon sperm DNA, 500 mg/ml total yeast RNA, and 50 mg/ml yeast tRNA) containing the radiolabeled probe at a concentration of 2 x 107 cpm/ml. After hybridization, the slides were rinsed in double-strength SSC (single-strength SSC is 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.015 M sodium citrate), and nonhybridized RNA was digested with 30 mg/ml RNase A for 30 min at 37°C. Final wash stringency was 0.1-strength SSC (60°C). Slides were rinsed and dehydrated in ascending alcohols. For autoradiographic detection of hybridization, slides were dipped in nuclear tract emulsion (Kodak NTB-3; Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY), air dried, and allowed to expose for 14 wk at 4°C.
Immunocytochemistry
Slides for FSH immunocytochemistry were then incubated overnight with the NIDDK (Rockville, MD) rabbit anti-rat FSH primary antibody (1:500) at room temperature after in situ hybridization, but prior to autoradiography. An anti-rabbit secondary antibody coupled to biotin was visualized by diaminobenzidine using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA). After detection of FSH-immunoreactive cells, slides were dipped in emulsion. The radiolabeled cells were detected by autoradiography and the FSH-containing cells by light microscopy. A brown oxidation product overlaid by silver grains was indicative of a double-labeled cell.
Image Analysis
The number of grains per fixed area was counted using a video camera (Sony XC-77; Tokyo, Japan) connected to a Zeiss (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) microscope and an Apple Power Macintosh 7100 (Cupertino, CA) computer and utilizing National Institutes of Health Image (version 1.57; Bethesda, MD) software. A grain-counting macro originally written by Dr. Karl Beykirch (UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA) and adapted for our use by Dr. Alan Nagahara (Loyola University, Chicago, IL) was used. The macro counted the density of silver grains, identified by darkfield microscopy, by calculating the number of pixels of label above the user-defined threshold. A region corresponding to 40 µm2 was analyzed. Measurements were taken from 25 regions from five different sections for each animal, and the means of the five sections were averaged together to give the mean for that animal. Since the distribution of grains for Act RIIB was more restricted, counts were made from labeled areas only. Since cells were densely packed, an area roughly the size of a single cell was selected based on the discretion of the experimenter. The data were expressed as the percentage of area covered by grains (mean grain area).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed across age by one-way ANOVA. Post hoc comparisons were made using the Student-Newman-Keuls test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Figure 1 shows pituitary mRNA levels of ßA and ßB on PND 8, 10, 12, 15, and 21. The mRNA levels are expressed as a percentage of those in the diestrous adult female (n = 4). The data represent the mean of triplicate determinations from four separate animals. ßA levels were significantly elevated on PND 8, 10, 12, and 15, but not PND 21, as compared to adult levels (p < 0.05). In general, ßA levels are 11/2 to 2 times higher in the infantile pituitary than in the adult. For ßB subunit, there was a significant effect of age across the infantile period [F(4,9) = 4.434; p < 0.03]. mRNA levels of ßB were elevated on PND 10 (p < 0.05) as compared to PND 8 and PND 15. At all infantile ages, ßB levels were not different from adult levels. Based on the length of exposure times, the level of ßB mRNA expression was considerably greater than that of ßA mRNA.
|
The ontogeny of pituitary follistatin mRNA levels is shown in Figure 2. One-way ANOVA revealed a significant effect of age [F(4,10) = 5.035; p < 0.02]. Follistatin mRNA levels were initially elevated on PND 8 (p < 0.05) and then dropped to adult levels by PND 10.
|
Activin Receptor Gene Expression
The cellular distribution of activin receptor subtypes RII and RIIB mRNAs was examined. In the infantile pituitary, Act RII mRNA was diffusely expressed in the posterior and anterior lobes (Fig. 3a). Act RIIB expression was limited to the anterior pituitary and appeared to be expressed in select cells (Fig. 3b). In addition, Act RIIB expression was much higher than that of Act RII, requiring one third the time for visualization using emulsion autoradiography. Sense strand probes showed no specific hybridization and served as negative controls (Fig. 3, c and d).
|
To determine whether or not the activin receptors are expressed in FSH-positive gonadotrophs, some sections were subjected to immunocytochemistry for FSH following in situ hybridization prior to autoradiography. FSH-immunoreactive cells coexpressed Act RII mRNA subtypes only 24.4 ± 2.8% of the time. Act RIIB mRNA was expressed in 85.7 ± 1.3% of FSH-positive cells (Fig. 4). A total of 94.3 ± 1.4% of Act RIIB mRNA-positive cells were also FSH positive, suggesting that Act RIIB mRNA expression appeared to be limited to FSH-expressing gonadotrophs.
|
The levels of expression of the type II subtypes were compared across the days of the infantile period by quantification of in situ hybridization density in sections not subjected to immunocytochemistry (Fig. 5). There were no significant effects of age for Act RIIB. Act RII mRNA expression, however, did differ significantly across time as determined by one-way ANOVA [F(4,10) = 7.713, p < 0.005], with levels on both PND 10 and 15 being significantly lower than those on PND 21 (p < 0.05).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the adult female rat, ßB homodimers have been identified from cultures of pituitary cells [21], and ßB mRNA has been detected in vivo [4]. Thus, activin B is thought to be the form that acts locally at the level of the pituitary. While the activin A protein subunit (ßA) is found in pituitary cultures [21], only very sensitive techniques, such as RT-PCR, have detected its mRNA [15]. Activin A, therefore, is thought to be primarily of ovarian origin and may not influence pituitary gene expression. In contrast to observations in the adult, both ßA and ßB subunit mRNAs are expressed in the infantile rat pituitary. ßB is expressed at approximately adult levels. However, when compared to adult levels, ßA expression is about twofold greater. This raises the possibility that in the infantile rat, both activin A and activin B may function as paracrine regulators of FSH expression. These data also demonstrate the differences between the pre- and postpubertal female pituitary. The possibility exists that the mechanisms of FSH-ß regulation are different under these conditions.
Additionally, both ßA and ßB are developmentally regulated in the pituitary. Their expression is highest on PND 10 just prior to the FSH-ß mRNA peak on PND 12 [2]. This suggests the possibility that activin A or B may play a role in the selective up-regulation of FSH-ß mRNA. Activin A has been shown to increase FSH-ß mRNA as well as secretion in vivo [10, 22] and in vitro [3]. Activin B is also involved in stimulating a selective increase in FSH secretion in vitro [10]. In these experiments, the effects reported were rapid, within 212 h. In contrast, in the infantile rat, the peak of FSH is seen 2 days after the highest levels of activin mRNA are achieved. Since very little is known about the relationship of mRNA increases to activin secretion or clearance, the time frame for its effects remain unclear. It seems likely, however, that the time frame reported here could complement the FSH-ß mRNA increases.
During infantile development, follistatin mRNA levels are similar to those of the adult, except on PND 8, when levels are 2 times higher. The elevation of follistatin precedes that of activins by 2 days, and this could potentially alter activin action. The high levels of follistatin mRNA decrease at the time activin peaks. If this follistatin indeed binds to activin to prevent its action, this rapid decrease could make more free activin available to bind to its receptor.
In the present studies we describe the ontogeny of the mRNA levels of ßA, ßB, and follistatin. Whether or not the changes in mRNA levels reflect levels of secreted protein remains to be determined. Translation efficiency, posttranslational modifications, and secretion could also play a role in the regulation of the secreted protein product. In this study, we did not investigate the expression of the inhibin
subunit, which combines with the ß subunits to form inhibin. Previous studies have suggested that inhibin is not physiologically important in FSH regulation before PND 20 [23, 24]. Since the ß subunit forms a dimer with the
subunit to form the inhibin molecules, it remains possible that the level of
subunit expression relative to ß subunits could modulate the amount of the ß dimers present, and thus the amount of biologically active activin.
Our data demonstrate that Act RII and Act RIIB mRNAs are present in the infantile female rat. They have previously been identified in the adult rat pituitary [9, 20]. Our data suggest that of the two type II receptors, Act RIIB is more likely associated with activin signaling for regulating FSH expression. This is further emphasized by the fact that virtually of all RIIB mRNA-positive cells are also FSH positive.
Our studies show that no significant developmental changes occur in Act RIIB mRNA expression. Act RII mRNA levels change with age, but because Act RII is rarely expressed in gonadotrophs, this developmental change does not appear to be relevant for selective FSH regulation. Thus, if the activin system is involved in the developmental regulation of FSH, this probably occurs through changing levels of ligand concentration. Physiologically important interactions between activin and follistatin proteins may occur at this time to enhance activin efficacy, but this possibility remains to be determined.
In the infantile pituitary, activin subunit ßA mRNA is expressed at a higher level than in the adult pituitary. Differences between infantile animals and adults are also seen with the activin receptor subtypes. It has previously been reported that Act RII is expressed at a much higher level than Act RIIB [20]. In the infantile female pituitary, Act RIIB is expressed at a much higher level than Act RII. This is consistent with the observation that during fetal development, only Act RIIB mRNA can be detected in the pituitary [25]. These observations suggest that at some critical period in prepubertal development, changes occur in the pituitary that result in different adult regulation of the activin system, in particular ßA and Act RIIB mRNA expression.
A previous study reported the distribution of Act RII and Act RIIB mRNA by in situ hybridization in the adult pituitary [9]. In that study, Act RII mRNA expression was similar to what we report: a diffuse expression throughout the pituitary. Act RIIB distribution was different in that our data show there to be punctate expression in the anterior lobe only. Previously, it was reported that RIIB was diffusely expressed throughout the pituitary, with high levels in the intermediate lobe [9]. In our study we examined RIIB expression in infantile females, whereas the previous study used adult females. It remains possible that Act RIIB distribution changes during pubertal development.
These data demonstrate that the activin subunits and follistatin are developmentally regulated at the mRNA level in the prepubertal pituitary. One possible source of this regulation is estrogen. Estrogen has been shown to stimulate activin A in ovarian granulosa cells [26] and may regulate pituitary follistatin mRNA [15]. We have evidence showing that estrogen regulates FSH during this time [27], but it remains to be seen whether its effect is mediated directly or through the activin system.
The present studies provide important insight into the development of the activin system in the prepubertal pituitary gland. The infantile female rat presents another situation in which gonadotropins are differentially expressed. An understanding of the development of the activin system in this model will be important in understanding the role activin may play in such regulation.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: Robert J. Handa, Department of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 South First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153. FAX: (708) 2163913; rhanda{at}wpo.it.luc.edu ![]()
3 Current address: Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536. ![]()
Accepted: March 16, 1998.
Received: November 21, 1997.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ßA, and ßB subunits in various tissues predicts diverse functions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988; 85:247251.
, ßA, ßB subunits of inhibin or activin and follistatin in rat pancreatic islets. FEBS Lett 1993; 319:217220.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Gregory, C. T. Lacza, A. A. Detz, S. Xu, L. A. Petrillo, and U. B. Kaiser Synergy between Activin A and Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Transcriptional Activation of the Rat Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-{beta} Gene Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2005; 19(1): 237 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Dupont, J. McNeilly, A. Vaiman, S. Canepa, Y. Combarnous, and C. Taragnat Activin Signaling Pathways in Ovine Pituitary and L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cells Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1877 - 1887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Herath, M. Yamashita, G. Watanabe, W. Jin, S. Tangtrongsup, A. Kojima, N. P. Groome, A. K. Suzuki, and K. Taya Regulation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion by Estradiol and Dimeric Inhibins in the Infantile Female Rat Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1623 - 1633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |