|
|
||||||||
a Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, Wisconsin 53190
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of model systems have been used to dissect the complex neuroendocrine interactions in the hypothalamus that are responsible for coordinated hypothalamic LHRH release. In vivo models used to measure episodic LHRH release have included frequent sampling of pituitary portal blood [1114], push-pull perifusion [1517], and microdialysis [18] of the S-ME and anterior pituitary. These models yield the most physiologically relevant results, but include a complex neuronal network that is difficult to dissect pharmacologically. A pioneering effort that developed an in vitro model used a tissue perifusion system to measure episodic LHRH release from hypothalamic explants [19]. Others have subsequently used hypothalamic tissue perifusion [20] and culture of disrupted hypothalamic tissue [21] to evaluate facets of the mechanism for coordinated LHRH release. The present study used both intact hemihypothalamus explants and enzymatically dispersed hypothalamic neurons in a perifusion culture system to determine whether coordinated hypothalamic LHRH release is dependent on cell-cell connections in vitro.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Seven adult male Sprague-Dawley rats from Harlan Sprague-Dawley (Madison, WI) weighing 250320 g were used in these experiments. The rats were housed for 14 wk in individual cages under controlled temperature and lighting conditions and were given free access to food and water. The rats were killed by decapitation at 07300830 h, and the hypothalami were removed. These experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals.
Cell and Tissue Preparation
The mediobasal hypothalamusdelimited laterally by the hypothalamic fissures, anteriorly by a cut 2 mm anterior to the anterior aspect of the optic chiasm, and posteriorly by the rostral portion of the mamillary bodieswas surgically removed by a horizontal cut of approximately 2 mm in depth and divided in half longitudinally down the midline. Each hemihypothalamus was placed in medium, a modified Krebs-Ringer bicarbonate buffer containing 2.2 mM CaCl2, 154 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 1.0 mM MgCl, 6.0 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 2 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA, and 0.006% bacitracin, pH = 7.4. One hemihypothalamus was placed in medium while the corresponding hemihypothalamus was enzymatically dispersed. Each dispersed half was diced, using scalpels, into pieces of approximately 1 mm3. These pieces were suspended in medium containing 0.05% trypsin and were incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The suspension was triturated ten times with a sterile 5-ml pipette every 5 min. Each cell preparation sat for 1 min to allow large pieces to precipitate, and the cell suspension was poured into another sterile 15-ml tube and centrifuged for 5 min at 800 rpm to pellet the dispersed hypothalamic cells. The cells and intact tissue were loaded into their respective chambers in the perifusion system, and 5-µm membrane filters were added to the afferent and efferent ports of the chambers. Exclusion of methylene blue dye by dispersed cells was determined as an index of viability. Approximately 9599% of the cells were single or paired cells at the time of dispersion. Four to 8 h later, > 95% of the cells remained dispersed on the basis of microscopic examination.
Perifusion Procedures
An Endotronics Accusyst S cell perifusion system (Cellex Biosciences Inc., Minneapolis, MN) was used during these experiments. The previously described medium was pumped into chambers containing either hemihypothalamus (intact tissue) or dispersed cells at a flow rate of 100 µl/min. Carbon dioxide flowed into the chamber area to maintain the pH of the medium, having access through gas-permeable afferent lines into the chamber. The system was run for ~10 h/experiment, and 1-ml fractions were collected at 10-min intervals using a refrigerated Gilson (Middleton, WI) FC205 fraction collector. Some of the tissues were challenged with 56 mM KCl 1 h before the completion of the experiment. Samples were frozen at -70°C until RIA.
LHRH RIA
The LHRH RIA used has been described previously [15, 22]. LHRH concentration in perfusates was estimated using anti-LHRH provided by Dr. T. Nett (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO) (R1245). Synthetic LHRH used as trace and standard was purchased from Richelieu Laboratories, Inc. (Montreal, PQ, Canada). Sensitivity of the assay was 0.1 pg/tube at 95% binding. The intraassay and interassay coefficient of variation were 6.8% and 9.4%, respectively.
Pulse Detection
Pulsatile release of LHRH by this preparation was determined by the PULSAR computer algorithm [23]. The parameters used for LHRH pulse detection were similar to those previously reported for LHRH release in vivo [15, 22]. The cut-off criteria for G1, G2, G3, G4, and G5 were, respectively, 3.8, 2.6, 1.9, 1.5, and 1.2 standard deviations. The intraassay coefficient of variation for LHRH was described by the formula y = 3.38X + 3.14/100.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Of interest is the fact that time = 0 on these figures represents a temporal delay of less than 80 min from the time the rats were killed and less than 20 min from the removal of the dispersed cells from the centrifuge. The viability of the dispersed cell preparations was determined during the first 60 min of the perifusion using cells remaining in the centrifuge tube after the perifusion chamber was loaded. Cell viability was checked 8 h later using cells stored in medium during the experiment.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Other physiological approaches to analysis of the mechanism of LHRH pulse generation included a number of sophisticated in vitro models. Mechanistic studies, by virtue of the pulsatile nature of LHRH release, require periodic sampling to determine baseline and induced effects on the parameters of LHRH release. This inspired the development of an elegant in vitro model system by Gallardo and Ramirez 20 years ago using perifusion of hypothalamic explants and repeated sampling [19]. This work laid the foundation for the physiologically meaningful in vitro study of LHRH release.
A recent innovative application of the in vitro perifusion technique used an immortalized LHRH neuronal cell line developed by Mellon and colleagues [28] in a perifusion culture system. Use of the GT1 cell line has resulted in studies of second messenger systems associated with LHRH release [29, 30] and of cell-cell communication between immortalized LHRH cells [31, 32]. This model has the obvious experimental advantage over in situ model systems in consisting of a relatively pure culture of LHRH neurons. However, the GT1 cell line does have limitations as a physiological model for the study of LHRH release. These limitations, many of which are characteristic of the use of immortal cell lines, are discussed eloquently by Selmanoff in a recent commentary [33]. Of the seven points Selmanoff [33] makes, three are particularly appropriate to this discussion. First, use of a homogenous cell line (GT1 cells) isolates the LHRH neurons from normal in situ interactions with other afferent neurons and supporting glia [33]. Second, when normal LHRH cells are stereotaxically placed in the hypothalamus of hypogonadal mice, they innervate the median eminence [34]. When GT1 cells are implanted, the axons rarely project to the median eminence [35]. Third, the GT1 cell preparation generally uses several hundred thousand to millions of GT1 cells in a culture, while rodents typically have only 8001600 LHRH neurons in the entire hypothalamus [4, 5]. Thus, we need to be extremely conservative when assigning physiological relevance to work conducted using an immortalized cell line.
The primary hypothalamic cell culture perifusion system used in the present study provides a simple but elegant window through which researchers can evaluate the role of complex synaptic networks in the regulation of LHRH release. By comparing LHRH release from intact hemihypothalami with the release from the corresponding hemihypothalami that were enzymatically dispersed into largely single cells, we have a model that can be used to evaluate the importance of interneuronal connections on various modulators and regulators of LHRH release. The results of the present study provide compelling evidence that the coordinated release of LHRH in primary cultured hypothalamic cells from adult rats is pulsatile in the absence of most, if not all, of the endogenous synaptic organization. This observation agrees with the earlier observation by Krsmanovic and colleagues, who reported that enzymatically dispersed fetal hypothalamic cells released LHRH episodically [29]. Previous work reported that GT1 cells in culture grown on either coverslips [36] or beads [37] form interconnections within 36 h. GT1 cells cultured on beads required two days of culture and fetal hypothalamic neurons required three days of culture before pulsatile secretion of LHRH was detectable [29]. This is in stark contrast to the present study, in which episodic LHRH release from enzymatically dispersed hypothalamic neurons from adult rats was detectable within 1 h of culture.
Another study using GT1 cells on coverslips demonstrated that while cell-cell contacts occurred in that system on each coverslip, superfusion using two physically separated coverslips mounted in a Sykes-Moore chamber resulted in synchronized release from the entire preparation [31]. This suggests that a diffusible mediator coordinated the release of the separate neuronal populations from each coverslip. The present study extends this observation, suggesting that the LHRH neurons are capable of coordinating release primarily through a diffusible mediator. This, of course, represents only the minimum level of input necessary for coordinated LHRH release.
Synaptic communication between LHRH neurons, either directly through LHRH-to-LHRH connections or indirectly through an interneuronal network, most likely plays an important role in coordinated LHRH release in situ. Regardless, discovery that these cells can apparently communicate to coordinate episodic LHRH release through a diffusible mediator is an important step in determining the underlying mechanism for the generation of LHRH pulses in vivo. The present results demonstrate that cell perifusion can provide a unique window through which the site of action of various neuromodulators of LHRH release can be observed.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence. FAX: (414) 4725633; wollerm{at}uwwvax.uww.edu ![]()
Accepted: April 23, 1998.
Received: February 24, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Shimshek, T. Bus, V. Grinevich, F. N. Single, V. Mack, R. Sprengel, D. J. Spergel, and P. H. Seeburg Impaired Reproductive Behavior by Lack of GluR-B Containing AMPA Receptors But Not of NMDA Receptors in Hypothalamic and Septal Neurons Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2006; 20(1): 219 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Woller, S. Meyer, A. Ada-Nguema, and D. Waechter-Brulla Dissecting Autocrine Effects on Pulsatile Release of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone in Cultured Rat Hypothalamic Tissue Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2004; 229(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vazquez-Martinez, S. L. Shorte, W. J. Faught, D. C. Leaumont, L. S. Frawley, and F. R. Boockfor Pulsatile Exocytosis Is Functionally Associated with GnRH Gene Expression in Immortalized GnRH-Expressing Cells Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5364 - 5370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Woller, S. Tessmer, D. Neff, A. A. Nguema, B. V. Roo, and D. Waechter-Brulla Leptin Stimulates Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Release From Cultured Intact Hemihypothalami and Enzymatically Dispersed Neurons Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2001; 226(6): 591 - 596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Rubin Hypothalamic Alterations and Reproductive Aging in Female Rats: Evidence of Altered Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Neuronal Function Biol Reprod, April 1, 2000; 63(4): 968 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |