Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 49-57 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Differential Distribution of Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor Isoforms in Mouse Oocytes1

Rafael A. Fissoreb, Frank J. Longoc, Everett Andersond, Jan B. Paryse, and Tom Ducibella2,a

a Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Anatomy/Cell Biology, Tufts University School of Medicine and New England Medical Center Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02111 b Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003 c Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 d Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5701 e Laboratorium voor Fysiologie, Campus Gasthuisberg O/N, K. U. Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In mammalian fertilization, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R)-dependent Ca2+ release is a crucial signaling event that originates from the vicinity of sperm-egg interaction and spreads as a wave throughout the egg cytoplasm. While it is known that Ca2+ is released by the type 1 IP3R in the egg cortex, the potential involvement of other isoform types responsible for the Ca2+ rise in the mouse egg (interior) and their spatial distribution are not known. In addition, the biochemical basis has not been definitively established for the development of increased sensitivity to inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) during meiotic maturation. Using specific antibodies to the type 1, 2, and 3 IP3R, we tested the hypotheses that different IP3R isoforms are responsible for the internal Ca2+ elevation and that they contribute to the maturation-associated acquisition of IP3 sensitivity. In both preovulatory oocytes and ovulated eggs of CF-1 mice, immunofluorescence revealed that types 1 and 2 isoforms were present in the cell cortex and interior. Type 1 was observed throughout the cytoplasm, and Western analysis indicated a 1.9-fold maturation-associated increase. In contrast, the signals detected for the type 2 (high-affinity) isoform and type 3 were present to a lesser extent, with type 2 restricted to isolated islands (similar to aggregates of vesicles detected by electron microscopy), which, in the cortex, may amplify early sperm-egg signaling events. The cortical-to-perinuclear localization of the receptor and cortical vesicle aggregates imply an efficient mechanism for propagating Ca2+ release from the cortex into the interior of the egg to activate development, and the isoform localization analysis indicates a clear spatial and biochemical heterogeneity. Types 1 and 2 isoforms were also present in granulosa cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Interaction of the gametes at fertilization initiates an increase in cytosolic intracellular calcium (Ca2+), which is required for egg activation and subsequent embryo development [16]. In most eggs, this Ca2+ release takes the form of a wave that is initiated at the site of sperm-egg interaction and spreads from the cortex into the interior of the cytoplasm to the opposite pole of the egg. The Ca2+ released at fertilization is primarily derived from the egg's endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [7, 8], the morphology of which has been extensively characterized [911]. The ER is endowed with calcium ATPase pumps (to load the ER), storage proteins for intra-ER calcium sequestration, and specific Ca2+ release channels, e.g., the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) and/or ryanodine receptor [7, 8, 1214]. Thus, the egg's ER has the necessary cellular and biochemical components to mediate Ca2+ release at fertilization.

In mature mammalian eggs at metaphase II (MII) of meiosis, 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) is primarily responsible for the Ca2+ release and Ca2+-dependent events associated with fertilization, while the ryanodine receptor is believed to play a lesser role [5, 1526]. In contrast to MII eggs, fully grown germinal vesicle (GV)-stage oocytes exhibit reduced calcium release when stimulated with IP3, sperm, or Ca2+ [2731]. In GV-stage oocytes, these agonists also result in little or no cortical granule exocytosis [3234], perhaps in part because of the reduction in Ca2+ released. One hypothesis to account for these deficiencies is that the calcium storage and release systems undergo important developmental changes during meiotic maturation, resulting in full competence to stimulate egg activation at MII [3537].

Two maturation-associated changes that may account for the development of activation competence are an increase in the amount of the IP3R in mammalian oocytes [36, 38] and the reorganization of putative calcium stores. The fluorescent lipophilic dye DiI (which spreads into ER membranes) when injected into MII mouse oocytes becomes localized to cortical foci; however, labeled foci are reportedly absent in the deeper cytoplasm [35]. In contrast, GV-stage oocytes possess few cortical DiI-stained foci whereas larger dye accumulations are present deeper in the cytoplasm [35]. Immunolocalization [36] of the IP3R type 1 isoform was greater in the cortex of the mouse MII egg than in the GV oocyte, but little staining was observed in the interior cytoplasm at either stage. During hamster oocyte maturation, DiI and IP3R staining patterns also change, but in a manner differing from that observed in maturing mouse oocytes ([37]; see Discussion).

Other mechanisms may be responsible, at least in part, for changes in the sensitivity of the maturing egg to IP3 and the egg's ability to release Ca2+. In most somatic cells, more than one IP3R isoform is expressed and the relative ratios vary among cell types [3942]. Also, the distribution of the various isoforms can be heterogeneous in some cells [43, 44]. Interestingly, the IP3 affinity of the three isoforms varies greatly, with the type 2 isoform (IP3R-2) having the highest [45, 46] and the IP3R-3 the lowest affinity [46]. Because the roles such isoforms may play in egg development and activation have not been explored, we have investigated the following questions: Are multiple IP3R isoforms present in oocytes and eggs? Is the maturation-associated acquisition of increased sensitivity to IP3 due to a change in the amount or distribution of the high-affinity type 2 isoform? Does the localization of a particular IP3R isoform provide a structural basis for the internal Ca2+ wave demonstrated by others? Do different isoforms have different spatial distributions?


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Isolation of GV-Stage Oocytes and MII Eggs

Swiss random-bred CF-1 mice (Charles River Breeding Labs., Wilmington, MA), 8–12 wk of age, were injected with 5 IU of eCG (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and GV-stage oocytes were collected after 44–48 h by ovarian follicle puncture. Only oocytes ~80 µm in diameter and having surrounding normal condensed cumulus were used. After collection from oviducts, MII eggs with cumulus were prepared for microscopic studies, whereas cumulus-free eggs (0.1% hyaluronidase treated) were used for Western blot analysis. For each GV or MII collection, at least 4–8 females were employed.

Antibodies

The unique C-terminal region of the IP3R has been useful for generating specific antibodies in previous studies of eggs [13, 14, 36, 47, 48]. In this study, we used the isoform-specific rabbit polyclonal antibodies Rbt04 and Rbt02 raised against IP3R-1 and -2, respectively. They are directed against the C-terminal amino acids of the mouse IP3R-1 and IP3R-2 (type 1: LGHPPHMNVNPQQPA, type 2: SNTPHVNHHMPPH). The antibody against IP3R-3 is an IgG2a monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) directed against the N-terminal region of the human IP3R-3 (amino acids 22–230). These various isoform-specific antibodies were characterized previously and shown not to mutually cross-react [40, 46, 49].

Membrane Preparations and Western Blots

Microsomes from mouse ovaries were prepared as described previously [13, 38]. In brief, tissue samples were homogenized with a glass-polytetrafluoroethylene homogenizer in 0.3 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM PMSF, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) and centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min. The supernatant was recentrifuged at 105 000 x g for 45 min, and the microsomal precipitates were resuspended in 0.3 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). Crude lysates from GV oocytes or MII eggs were made after the zona pellucida was removed by acid Tyrode treatment [36] for < 1 min at 20°C. Immediately upon zona dissolution in a concave well, the well was flooded with an excess of Earle's balanced salt solution (25 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.3, 0.1% polyvinyl pyrrolidone), and the eggs were removed promptly and transferred into sample buffer [50].

Microsomal preparations or crude mouse oocyte lysates in sample buffer were boiled for 4 min and loaded onto 4% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The separated proteins were then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Micron Separation Inc., Westboro, MA) using a Mini Trans Blot Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were first washed in PBS-0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and then blocked in the same solution supplemented with 6% nonfat dry milk (blocking solution). After additional washes in PBS-T, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the assigned primary antibody, washed again in PBS-T, and incubated for 1 h with a secondary horseradish peroxidase-coupled antibody. After three washes in PBS-T, membranes were developed using the ECL (enhanced chemiluminescence) detection system according to manufacturer instructions (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Anti-IP3R-1, -2, and -3 antibodies were used at 1:4000, 1:100–1:1000, and 1:500, respectively. Negative controls were obtained by using preimmune serum, omission of the primary antibody, or preincubation of the Rbt02 antiserum for 1 h with 5 mg/ml of the C-terminal peptide (Genemed Biotechnologies Inc., South San Francisco, CA) before dilution to 1:100–1:1,000 for probing the membrane. Positive controls were obtained by using cell lines with a known pattern of IP3R-isoform expression (data not shown). IP3R-1 and -3 are expressed in A7r5 rat smooth muscle cells, C3H10T1/2 mouse fibroblasts, and CHO-K1 chinese hamster ovary cells. In addition, the latter two cell lines express significant amounts of IP3R-2. Total microsomal fractions from these cell lines were therefore prepared as previously described for immunoblot positive controls [46]. The quantification of immunoreactive IP3R was carried out using Adobe Photoshop (Mountain View, CA). The intensity of the IP3R band in GV oocytes or from nonstimulated ovaries was used as the baseline value and arbitrarily assigned the value of 1. The intensity of the IP3R bands of MII oocytes or from eCG-stimulated ovaries was calculated relative to 1 and statistically compared, and the molecular masses were estimated by using prestained, broad range, SDS-PAGE molecular weight markers (Bio-Rad).

Immunofluorescence

Ovulated mouse cumulus masses were rapidly washed in two changes of PBS and pipetted into a droplet of OCT compound (Miles Inc., Kankakee, IL). The droplet was snap-frozen by rapid immersion in isopentane cooled in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Ovaries from mature mice, trimmed of adnexa, were also snap-frozen as described above. Frozen 5-µm sections from eggs and ovaries were mounted on glass slides and fixed for 15 min in one of the following solutions: a) acetone (-20°C), b) methanol (-20°C), or c) 1% paraformaldehyde (4°C) in PBS (as indicated in Results). After fixation in acetone or methanol, the specimens were allowed to dry; paraformaldehyde-fixed specimens were washed in two changes of PBS (5 min each). Specimens were blocked in 3% BSA in PBS.

Primary antibodies against IP3R-1 and IP3R-2 were used at a 1:100 dilution in 1% BSA in PBS; monoclonal antibody to IP3R-3 was employed at a dilution of 1:10–1:1000. After incubation for 1 h, the specimens were washed three times in PBS (5 min each) and incubated for 1 h in secondary antibody conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (goat anti-rabbit, 1:16 dilution for IP3R-1 and -2; goat anti-mouse, 1:20–1:100 for IP3R-3). Specimens were washed two times in PBS (15 min each) and stained in 4,6-diamidino-2-phenyl indole (DAPI; Sigma) for 5 min. After washing two times in PBS (5 min each), specimens were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA), covered with a glass coverslip, and viewed with epi-illumination. Specimens were photographed with Kodak (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) T-MAX film with an ASA of 800. Negative control experiments were performed with specimens incubated with preimmune serum to either isoform, or in the absence of primary antibodies, or with a mixture of IP3R-2 antibody and C-terminal peptide prepared similarly as described above for Western blots, diluted 1:100. In each case, labeled secondary antibody was subsequently added. Observations of specimens subjected to IP3R-1, -2, and -3 were made from over 100 sectioned ovulated oocytes and approximately 30 sectioned ovaries.

Electron Microscopy (EM)

Cumulus-egg masses and ovaries were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.5% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M phosphate buffer. They were then osmicated (0.5%) for 60 min at 4°C, washed in buffer and water, en bloc stained in 0.5% uranyl acetate for 15 min at 4°C, dehydrated, and embedded in Epon-Araldite (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). Thin sections were stained briefly with uranyl acetate followed by lead [51]. In an effort to characterize cytoplasmic membranes, 10 MII and 10 GV-stage oocytes were thin-sectioned, resulting in about 100 electron micrographs per stage (5 x 7 inches in size; x17 000). These were analyzed for membrane systems in the vicinity of the cell cortex [51].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical comparisons of the intensity of IP3R bands were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Student's t-test if significance was found (p < 0.05) in the ANOVA analysis. The Student's t-test was used to compare mean distances between IP3R-2-stained foci.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Western Analysis of IP3R Isoforms

During meiotic maturation, mammalian oocytes develop an increased sensitivity to IP3. To determine whether this is associated with a change in the amount or ratio of IP3R isoforms, lysates from equal numbers (n = 50) of mouse GV oocytes or MII eggs were evaluated by immunoblotting with isoform-specific antibodies. Indicative of the IP3R in mammalian oocytes [19, 36, 38], a band of approximately 260 kDa was found in both the GV and MII stages with type 1 antibodies (Fig. 1). In zona-free specimens, the density of the IP3R-1 increased about 1.9-fold during meiotic maturation (Fig. 1A). The IP3R-1 was detected in as few as 20 MII eggs. As a negative control, the primary antiserum to the IP3R-1 was replaced by preimmune serum and the corresponding IP3R-1 band was not observed (data not shown).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Western blot analysis of the IP3R-1 in mouse oocytes (A) and in ovarian microsomal preparations (B). A) Crude lysates from 50 GV-stage oocytes and MII eggs were run and probed with the IP3R-1 antibody. The density of the IP3R-1 increased as maturation progressed (p < 0.05). B) The procedure was as above, but ovarian microsomal preparations from unstimulated (UNSTIM) and eCG-stimulated (STIM) animals were probed; 0.002 mg of total protein was loaded per lane. Densitometric quantification is shown by bar graphs to the right. Values with an asterisk are different from control values (p < 0.05).

In order to determine whether there is an increase in the IP3R-1 in ovarian tissue during follicular growth in response to gonadotropin, mice were treated with 5 IU of eCG, and ovaries were harvested 44–48 h later. Equine CG alone was used in order to maximize the number of follicle cells. When equal amounts of total microsomal protein were compared from samples from unstimulated (control) and eCG-treated mice, it was found that gonadotropin stimulation did not result in a significant increase in the amount of the IP3R-1 (Fig. 1B).

IP3R-2 appeared to be less abundant than IP3R-1, because it was not detected in samples of ~1000 pooled MII mouse eggs. In contrast, the IP3R-2 was easily detectable in ovarian microsomal samples (Fig. 2A), although it was less abundant and had a slightly smaller molecular mass (250 kDa) than the IP3R-1 (not shown), as previously reported for other mouse cell types [46]. In addition, the amount of IP3R-2 increased ~50% after gonadotropin stimulation (Fig. 2, B and C; p < 0.05). The gonadotropin sensitivity of follicle cells, combined with their strong immunofluorescence staining in granulosa cells (see below), suggests that the IP3R-2 is present primarily in follicle cells. In a negative control experiment, the IP3R-2 band was not detected when the primary antibody was preincubated with the C-terminal peptide. In additional control studies (data not shown), the presence or absence of IP3R-2 was confirmed in cell lines known to be positive or negative for IP3R-2 (see Materials and Methods and [46]).



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Western blot analysis of IP3R-2 in ovarian microsomal preparations. A) Western blot procedures were carried out as above but using 0.04 mg/lane of microsomal ovarian proteins. The IP3R-2 antibody was used to probe the membranes. As control, an ovarian microsomal sample treated with Rbt02 antiserum and preincubated with the C-terminal peptide of the type 2 IP3R (P-Ovary) was used. Preincubation with the peptide was performed as indicated in Materials and Methods. The blocked antibody failed to mark the band corresponding to the IP3R-2. B) Ovarian microsomal preparations from unstimulated (Unstim) and eCG-stimulated (Stim) animals were probed. C) Densitometric scans of the unstimulated and stimulated blots in B. Values with an asterisk are different from control values (p < 0.05). Molecular standard on left in A and B.

The IP3R-3 was easily detected in mouse ovarian microsomes and as a faint band in a sample of 1100 mouse MII eggs (Fig. 3). It appeared as a band at approximately its predicted size of 248 kDa. The lower molecular mass band (about 177 kDa) present in ovaries was also previously detected in other tissues and believed to represent a proteolytic fragment [40]. GV-stage oocytes were not examined for IP3R-2 and -3 because of the difficulty in obtaining such a large number of oocytes completely free from granulosa cell contamination, coupled with the difficulty in detecting types 2 and 3 bands in MII eggs.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Western blot analysis of IP3R-3. Lanes (left to right): ovarian microsome preparation, ovarian microsome control (C-ovary) without primary antibody, and 1100 MII mouse eggs. The (primary) antibody against IP3R-3 was used to probe the membrane; 0.02 mg of ovarian microsomal protein was used in the two ovary lanes. Molecular standard on left.

Immunofluorescence of IP3R Isoforms

The spatial localization of calcium release channels has profound implications for the initiation and spread of the fertilization-associated Ca2+ wave. Because the IP3R-1 has not been reported in the mouse egg interior and because the distribution of other IP3R isoforms is not known in these cells, an immunofluorescence localization study was undertaken with isoform-specific antibodies. The IP3R-1 antibodies had a reticular staining pattern throughout the egg (Fig. 4, a–c). This staining pattern was similar in acetone- and methanol-fixed preparations. Paraformaldehyde-fixed specimens were inconsistent in their reactivity to the antibodies employed here. The descriptions that follow are from methanol-fixed specimens. Cumulus cells also had a bright cytoplasmic fluorescence with antibodies to the IP3R-1 (Fig. 4, a and c).



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. MII eggs (ac) and GV-stage oocytes (d,<<008>>e) stained with antibody to IP3R-1 (ad) and DAPI for DNA (d',<<008>>e'). a) MII egg and cumulus cells (C). b,<<008>>c) MII eggs and cumulus cells illustrating the distribution of IP3R-1 staining. IP3R-1 staining is present throughout the oocyte (ad) and cumulus cell cytoplasms (a,<<008>>d). A control reacted only with secondary antibody (e) and DAPI (e'). N, germinal vesicle. The pair (d,<<008>>d' or e,<<008>>e') are the same section. Bars for a,<<008>>d,<<008>>e = 10 µm; for b and c = 5 µm.

With antibodies to IP3R-1, follicular GV-stage oocytes demonstrated fluorescence throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 4d). Differences in the intensity and pattern of staining were not apparent in non-antral and early to late antral follicles. Follicle cells had diffuse and punctate staining, identified by staining outside of the nucleus (compare Fig. 4, d and d').

In contrast to the staining pattern seen with IP3R-1 antibodies, bright punctate deposits of cytoplasmic fluorescence were observed in ovulated MII eggs incubated with IP3R-2 antibodies (Fig. 5, a and a''; Fig. 5a', chromatin staining). The larger stained deposits varied in size with a range of 1–3 µm in diameter. In the region 0–5 µm from the cell surface, these deposits had an average distance apart of about 3 µm in both GV and MII stages (Table 1). The deposits were not strictly localized to any specific region within the egg; both cortical and subcortical regions contained the stained bodies. Cumulus cells were observed to have stained with the IP3R-2 antibody in a pattern much like that described for the IP3R-1 antibody; i.e., staining was prevalent throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 5, a and a''). Starting with secondary follicles and up to and including large antral follicles, the periphery of the GV itself reacted with the IP3R-2 antibody (Fig. 5, b and c). In antral follicles, oocyte staining was present in discreet areas scattered throughout the cytoplasm and was reminiscent of that in ovulated eggs (Fig. 5c; Fig. 5c', chromatin staining).



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. MII eggs (a,<<008>>a',<<008>>a'') and GV-stage oocytes (bd) stained with antibody to the IP3R-2 and DAPI for DNA (a',<<008>>b',<<008>>c',<<008>>d'). A punctate staining pattern was present in both eggs and oocytes. Shown in a'' is a grazing section through one pole of an ovulated cumulus-oocyte complex. In early antral follicles (c), oocytes also possessed staining along the perimeter of the GV (N) and plasma membrane (arrows). Staining for the IP3R-2 was also present in the cytoplasm of cumulus cells (C in a–c). A control reacted only with secondary antibody (d) and DAPI (d'). Same section pairs: a,<<008>>a'; b,<<008>>b'; c,<<008>>c'; d,<<008>>d'. Bars for ad = 10 µm.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Mean distance between vesicle aggregatesa (observed by EM) and foci positive for IP3R-2a (0–5 µm from the surface).

Negative control preimmune sera for both IP3R-1 and-2 antibodies, or specimens treated with only secondary antibody, provided identical results; i.e., virtually no fluorescence was detectable in ovulated eggs and ovarian oocytes (see Materials and Methods) (Figs. 4e, 5d; Figs. 4e', 5d', chromatin staining). Preparations immunodepleted with the IP3R-2 C-terminal-specific polypeptide sequence did not demonstrate reactivity to sectioned eggs and ovaries. With a spectrum of antibody dilutions (1:10–1:1000), it was not possible to conclusively demonstrate specific localization of IP3R-3 relative to control antibodies in oocytes and cumulus cells.

EM

In order to identify structures that would be isomorphic with those staining with IP3R antibodies (above) and to determine the distribution of the ER, several electron microscopic approaches were undertaken. Conventional EM demonstrated discrete small (0.1- to 0.3-µm diameter) membrane-bound vesicles that formed a larger aggregate in both GV-stage oocytes and MII eggs (large arrows, Fig. 6). These vesicles appeared more spherical than tubular in shape, and some were interconnected. An aggregate of vesicles was round to oval in shape and usually 1–2 µm in diameter. Aggregates were not observed in all sections (50–100 nm in thickness), indicating that they are discrete foci. In the cortex of GV oocytes and MII eggs, aggregates were spaced a mean distance of 21 µm and 3–4 µm apart, respectively (Table 1).



View larger version (188K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. An electron micrograph of the cortex of an MII mouse egg demonstrating three aggregates of small vesicles (large arrowheads). The aggregates are surrounded by other structures, including cortical granules (CG), mitochondria with limited cristae (M), fibrous sheets (FS) composed of intermediate filaments [77], and large lucent vesicles (L). The lucent vesicles were often observed in close proximity to aggregates of smaller vesicles. Small arrows indicate intimate vesicle associations or apparent vesicle fusion. Tubular extensions of membrane structures are indicated by asterisks. Under the zona pellucida (ZP) there is a small perivitelline space. x23 300 (reproduced at 52%).

Within aggregates, individual small vesicles (~0.1 µm diameter) had a somewhat electron-dense interior and were significantly smaller and less dense than cortical granules (Fig. 6). The vesicle aggregates were absent from the cortex underlying the meiotic spindle (data not shown), which is known to be an actin-rich region with a reduced number of organelles [52, 53]. In contrast, vesicles surrounding the aggregates were larger, were irregularly shaped, and had a more lucent interior with membrane-associated internal projections of greater density (Fig. 6). As previously observed, some of these large vesicles were within a tenth of a micron of the egg plasma membrane [51]. Specific labeling with anti-IP3R primary vs. preimmune antibodies at the ultrastructural level was unsuccessful, likely due to problems associated with paraformaldehyde fixation as also noted in fluorescence studies.

Quantification of Vesicle Aggregates

In order to determine whether there were maturation-associated changes in cortical aggregate number and similarities with the stained IP3R-2 foci, aggregates were quantified. More vesicle aggregates were observed at the ultrastructural level in MII eggs than in GV-stage oocytes (Tables 2 and 3). Also, a larger number of aggregates were observed in the cortex than in the subcortex (2–5 µm from the cell surface) for both stages (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Number of vesicle aggregates at the GV and MII stages.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Vesicle aggregates per area of egg cortex.*


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This investigation builds on previous studies of Ca2+ release and IP3 receptors in mouse eggs by demonstrating 1) an apparent predominance of IP3R-1 over IP3R-2 and IP3R-3; 2) the predicted cortical-to-perinuclear spatial distribution of the IP3R-1 consistent with internal Ca2+ elevations observed in mouse oocytes and eggs; 3) a distribution of the high-affinity IP3R-2 isoform different from that of IP3R-1, which is also in close proximity to the site of sperm-egg interaction; 4) the development of cortical aggregates of interconnected membrane vesicles that may represent the structural basis for the localization of IP3R close to the site of fertilization; and 5) a different distribution of the IP3R-1 and IP3R-2 in both oocytes and eggs. These data allow us to extend current models of IP3R-mediated mammalian egg activation.

This is the first report documenting the expression and localization of multiple IP3R isoforms in mammalian oocytes at the protein level and leads us to propose plausible functional roles for these isoforms. One or more cortical isoforms may play a role in initiating Ca2+ release, perhaps in conjunction with IP3 and a factor from sperm [5457]. Because the IP3R-1 and ER are present throughout the cytoplasm, they are likely to provide a continuous network for the spread of the Ca2+ wave in MII-stage mouse eggs [58] (e.g., IP3-induced Ca2+ release sensitizes adjacent IP3-sensitive stores that in turn perpetuate the Ca2+ wave [5]). Due to the nearly complete inhibition of Ca2+ release by the IP3R-1-specific antibody 18A10 (see below), the other IP3R isoforms may not release significant amounts of Ca2+ relative to the total released during egg activation, but they may play an indirect role. For example, localizations of the IP3R-2 may represent spatially disconnected relay stations with a higher affinity for IP3 than the IP3R-1 [45, 46]. These foci may facilitate the propagation of the Ca2+ wave through Ca2+-mediated local sensitization of the IP3R-1 [47, 5965]. It is also possible that, in the immediate microdomain of sperm-egg interaction, the IP3R-2 may play a role in initiating Ca2+ release that may not be detected if the global release via the IP3R-1 is inhibited by 18A10. An alternate function for the IP3R-2 and -3, which is also compatible with the 18A10 inhibition results, would be as a component of a heterotetrameric receptor [6668].

The Western, fluorescence, and 18A10 results suggest that the IP3R-1 is the most prevalent and functionally important isoform in vertebrate eggs. On Western blots, IP3R-1 was easily detected in 20 or 50 eggs, whereas 1100 eggs were required for a relatively faint band for IP3R-3. In addition, in Xenopus oocytes, the available evidence points to an exclusive or nearly exclusive presence of IP3R-1 (reviewed in [59]). Consistent with these findings are previous studies with the monoclonal function-blocking antibody 18A10 to the C-terminal region of the IP3R-1 [69]. Injection of 18A10 into mouse eggs blocks IP3-induced Ca2+ release to near basal levels at 88 µg/ml [36] and inhibits Ca2+-dependent egg activation events [20] occurring after fertilization or IP3 injection [70]. In hamster eggs, 18A10 (~300 µg/ml) blocks all detectable Ca2+ elevations activated by sperm or by amounts of injected IP3 sufficient to elicit a fertilization-like Ca2+ rise [5, 19].

Although evidence was presented at the mRNA level for the expression of the three IP3R isoforms [71], and both Western and immunofluorescence studies were undertaken with well-characterized antibodies to all three isoforms, the IP3R-2 Western and the IP3R-3 immunofluorescence was not identified by Western and immunofluorescence analysis, respectively. First, this is very likely due to the findings strongly suggesting that the vast majority of the receptor is IP3R-1 (i.e., only 20 eggs were needed for a strong IP3R-1 Western signal vs. a weak signal from 1100 eggs for IP3R-3; and complete cytoplasmic fluorescence was found for IP3R-1 vs. only small punctate regions for IP3R-2). Second, it is well known that some antibodies, especially at the limit of detection, work well for either Western blot or fluorescence, but not necessarily both methods.

The ultrastructural results extend previous fluorescence studies by directly visualizing cortical membrane structures fitting reported characteristics of the ER, the proposed site of Ca2+ stores involved in the Ca2+ wave at fertilization. The size, spacing, and morphology of aggregates of smaller vesicles by EM are similar to the focal cortical localizations of the ER stained by DiI [35]. In addition, in both cases, these structures are not observed in the cortex over the meiotic spindle. The small vesicles within an aggregate appear to be interconnected. There may be indirect continuity with other aggregates or subcortical ER by way of vesicle trafficking, as evidenced by the various stages of apparent vesicle fusion and vesicular structures between aggregates. It is also possible that there is direct continuity not visualized by EM, as previously indicated by 1–2-µm foci that appeared to be interconnected by fine irregular bridges in the DiI study [35]. It is of note that no other cortical membranes were observed in our study that could account for the specific characteristics of the DiI-stained large foci in MII eggs. In hamster oocytes, cortical collections of tubular profiles of ER are observed, although these appear to undergo a change to a less focal arrangement during maturation to the MII stage [37].

In MII eggs, the shape, diameter (1–2 µm), and spacing (3–4 µm) of the vesicle aggregates by EM are remarkably similar to the shape, diameter (1–3 µm), and spacing (3.3 µm) of the foci stained by the IP3R-2 antibody. This congruence strongly suggests but does not prove that the vesicle aggregates are a site of IP3R-2 localization. In addition, the high electron density and granularity of the contents of small vesicles within aggregates, by analogy with the density of the mitochondrial matrix (a Ca2+ sequestration site with electron-dense granules), may reflect a high concentration of protein and Ca2+ (Fig. 6).

This study supports previous investigations showing that the maturation-associated increase in sensitivity to IP3 is correlated with an increase in the mass of the receptor and an increase in cortical membrane foci in the cytoplasm [35, 36]. Similar to our previous finding of a 3- to 4-fold increase in individual vesicle profiles in the cortex during maturation [51], a 5-fold increase was observed in vesicle aggregates. However, an increase in the number of IP3R-2 antibody-staining foci was not observed in terms of the distance between foci. It is possible that not all vesicle aggregates identified by EM are stained by IP3R-2 antibodies and that some aggregates contain other receptor isoforms. For example, because the maturation-associated increase in vesicle aggregates is accompanied by a 90% increase in IP3R-1, the additional vesicle aggregates may represent new localizations of IP3R-1.

This study also demonstrated that the egg's companion granulosa cells possess IP3R-1 and -2, and possibly type 3 as well. These cells employ IP3 as a signaling molecule in response to protein hormones [72]. LH stimulates not only cAMP production but also an increase in phosphatidylinositol [73] and IP3 [74] via an LH receptor-mediated activation of phospholipase C [75]. Consistent with the ability of FSH to increase the number of granulosa cells and LH receptors [72], our findings are that gonadotropin priming via eCG significantly increases the amount of IP3R-2 but not IP3R-1 in ovarian microsomal fractions. This result suggests that the type 2 receptor may play an important role in responding to LH after FSH priming. The IP3R in the granulosa cells immediately surrounding the oocyte allows us to speculate that IP3 changes, mediated by gonadotropin receptor signaling, may regulate cytosolic Ca2+-mediated events that in turn influence the maturing oocyte through follicle cell-oocyte gap junctions [76].

In conclusion, this work provides evidence that heterogeneity at the level of IP3R-isoform expression exists in mouse oocytes and in granulosa cells. It is suggested that this heterogeneity may have a functional role in the initiation and propagation of intercellular Ca2+ signals that regulate oocyte-follicle cell interactions and intracellular signaling that initiates mammalian development.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The technical assistance of Chang Li He, Teru Jellurette, Yves Parijs, Vera Gross, and Allison Abbott is greatly appreciated.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by grants to T.D. (NIH HD 24191), E.A. (NIH HD 14574), F.L. (NIH HD 22085), and R.A.F. (USDA 94–1428, USDA 97–2919). J.B.P. is Research Associate of the Fund for Scientific Research—Flanders (F.W.O.) and was supported in part by G.O.A. grant 94/4. Back

2 Correspondence: Tom Ducibella, Dept. Ob/Gyn, Tufts University, School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Ave., Boston, MA 02111. FAX: 617 636 2917; tducibel{at}opal.tufts.edu Back

Accepted: August 18, 1998.

Received: May 1, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jaffe LF. The role of calcium explosions, waves, and pulses in activating eggs. In: Metz CB, Monroy A (eds.), Biology of Fertilization. New York: Academic Press; 1985: 127–165.
  2. Nuccitelli R. How do sperm activate eggs? Curr Top Dev Biol 1991; 25:1–16.
  3. Kline D, Kline JT. Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev Biol 1992; 149:80–89.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Whitaker M, Swann K. Lighting the fuse at fertilization. Development 1993; 117:1–12.[Abstract]
  5. Miyazaki S, Shirakawa H, Nakada K, Honda Y. Essential role of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor/Ca2+ release channel in Ca2+ waves and Ca2+ oscillations at fertilization of mammalian eggs. Dev Biol 1993; 158:62–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Swann K, Ozil JP. Dynamics of the calcium signal that triggers mammalian egg activation. Int Rev Cytol 1994; 152:183–222.[Medline]
  7. Han JK, Nuccitelli RL. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced calcium release in the organelle layers of the stratified, intact egg of Xenopus laevis. J Cell Biol 1990; 110:1103–1110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Teraksaki M, Sardet C. Demonstration of calcium uptake and release by sea urchin egg cortical endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Biol 1991; 115:1031–1037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Luttmer S, Longo FJ. Ultrastructural and morphometric observations of cortical endoplasmic reticulum in Arbacia, Spisula, and mouse eggs. Dev Growth Differ 1985; 27:349–359.[CrossRef]
  10. Jaffe LA, Terasaki M. Structural changes in the endoplasmic reticulum of starfish oocytes during meiotic maturation and fertilization. Dev Biol 1994; 164:579–587.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Terasaki M, Jaffe LA, Hunicutt GR, Hammer JA. Structural change in the endoplasmic reticulum during fertilization: evidence for loss of membrane continuity using the green fluorescent protein. Dev Biol 1996; 179:320–328.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. McPherson SM, McPherson PS, Mathews K, Campbell KP, Longo FJ. Cortical localization of calcium release channel in sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol 1992; 116:1111–1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kume S, Muto A, Aruga J, Nakagawa T, Michikawa T, Furuichi T, Nakade S, Okano H, Mikoshiba K. The Xenopus IP3 receptor: structure, function, and localization in oocytes and eggs. Cell 1993; 73:555–570.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Parys JB, McPherson SM, Mathews L, Campbell KP, Longo FJ. Presence of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor, calreticulin, and calsequestrin in eggs of sea urchins and Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 1994; 161:466–476.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Whitaker M, Irvine RF. Inositol (1,4,5) trisphosphate microinjection activates sea urchin eggs. Nature 1984; 312:636–639.[CrossRef]
  16. Busa WB, Ferguson JE, Joseph SK, Williamson JR, Nuccitelli R. Activation of frog (Xenopus laevis) eggs by inositol trisphosphate. I. Characterization of calcium release from intracellular stores. J Cell Biol 1985; 101:677–682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Miyazaki S. Fertilization potential and calcium transients in mammalian eggs. Dev Growth Differ 1988; 30:603–610.[CrossRef]
  18. Cran DG, Moor RM, Irvin RF. Initiation of the cortical reaction in hamster and sheep oocytes in response to inositol trisphosphate. J Cell Sci 1988; 91:139–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Miyazaki S, Yuzaki M, Nakada K, Shirakawa H, Nakanishi S, Nakade S, Mikoshiba K. Block of Ca2+ wave and Ca2+ oscillation by antibody to the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in fertilized hamster eggs. Science 1992; 257:251–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Xu Z, Kopf GS, Schultz RM. Involvement of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated Ca2+ release in early and late events of mouse egg activation. Development 1994; 120:1851–1859.[Abstract]
  21. Ayabe T, Kopf GS, Schultz RM. Regulation of mouse egg activation: presence of ryanodine receptors and effects of microinjected ryanodine and cyclic ADP ribose on uninseminated and inseminated eggs. Development 1995; 121:2233–2244.[Abstract]
  22. Kline JT, Kline D. Regulation of intracellular calcium in the mouse egg: evidence for inositoltrisphosphate-induced calcium release, but not calcium-induced calcium release. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:193–203.[Abstract]
  23. Fissore RA, Dobrinsky JR, Balise JJ, Duby RT, Robl JM. Patterns of Ca2+ concentrations in fertilized bovine eggs. Biol Reprod 1992; 47:960–969.[Abstract]
  24. Fissore RA, Robl JM. Mechanism of calcium oscillations in fertilized rabbit eggs. Dev Biol 1994; 166:634–642.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Fissore RA, Pinto-Correia C, Robl JM. Inositol trisphosphate-induced calcium release in the generation of calcium oscillations in bovine eggs. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:766–774.[Abstract]
  26. Schultz RM, Kopf GS. Molecular basis of mammalian egg activation. Curr Top Dev Biol 1995; 30:21–62.[Medline]
  27. Fujiwara T, Nakada K, Shirakawa H, Miyazaki S. Development of inositol trisphosphate-induced calcium release mechanism during maturation of hamster oocytes. Dev Biol 1993; 156:69–79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Mehlmann LM, Kline D. Regulation of intracellular calcium in the mouse egg: calcium release in response to sperm or inositol trisphosphate is enhanced after meiotic maturation. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:1088–1098.[Abstract]
  29. Jones K, Carroll J, Whittingham D. Ionomycin, thapsigargin, ryanodine, and sperm induced Ca2+ release increase during meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:6671–6677.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Carroll J, Jones KT, Whittingham DG. Ca2+ release and the development of Ca2+ release mechanisms during oocyte maturation: a prelude to fertilization. Rev Reprod 1996; 1:137–143.[Abstract]
  31. Chiba K, Kado RT, Jaffe LA. Development of calcium release mechanisms during starfish oocyte maturation. Dev Biol 1990; 140:300–306.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Ducibella T. The cortical reaction and the development of activation competence in mammalian oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2:29–42.
  33. Ducibella T, Kurasawa S, Duffy P, Kopf GS, Schultz RM. Regulation of the polyspermy block in the mouse egg: maturation-dependent differences in cortical granule exocytosis and zona pellucida modifications induced by inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and protein kinase C activators. Biol Reprod 1933; 48:1251–1257.[Abstract]
  34. Ducibella T, Buetow J. Competence to undergo normal, fertilization-induced cortical activation develops after metaphase I of meiosis in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1994; 165:95–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Mehlmann LM, Terasaki M, Jaffe L, Kline D. Reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum during meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev Biol 1995; 170:607–615.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Mehlmann LM, Mikoshiba K, Kline D. Redistribution and increase in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors after meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev Biol 1996; 180:489–498.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Shiraishi K, Okada A, Shirkawa H, Nakanishi S, Mikoshiba K, Miyazaki S. Developmental changes in the distribution of the endoplasmic reticulum and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors and the spatial pattern of Ca2+ release during maturation of hamster oocytes. Dev Biol 1995; 170:594–606.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. He C, Damiani P, Parys JB, Fissore R. Calcium, calcium release receptors, and meiotic resumption in bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:1245–1255.[Abstract]
  39. De Smedt H, Missiaen L, Parys JB, Bootman MD, Mertens L, Van Den Bosch L, Casteels R. Determination of relative amounts of inositol trisphosphate receptor mRNA isoforms by ratio polymerase chain reaction. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:21691–21698.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. De Smedt H, Missiaen L, Parys JB, Henning RH, Sienaert I, Vanlingen S, Gijsens A, Himpens B, Casteels R. Isoform diversity of the inositol trisphosphate receptor in cell types of mouse origin. Biochem J 1997; 322:575–583.
  41. Newton CL, Mignery GA, Sudhof TC. Co-expression in vertebrate tissues and cell lines of multiple inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) receptors with distinct affinities for InsP3. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:28613–28619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Wojcikiewicz RJ. Type I, II, and III inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors are unequally susceptible to down-regulation and are expressed in markedly different proportions in different cell types. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:11678–11683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sugiyama T, Furuya A, Monkawa T, Yamamoto-Hino M, Satoh S, Ohmori K, Miyawaki A, Hanai N, Mikoshiba K, Hasegawa M. Monoclonal antibodies distinctively recognizing the subtypes of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor: application to the studies on inflammatory cells. FEBS Lett 1994; 354:149–154.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Quinton TM, Dean WL. Multiple inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms are present in platelets. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 224:740–746.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Südhof T, Newton CL, Archer BT, Ushkaryov Y, Mignery GA. Structure of a novel InsP3 receptor. EMBO J 1991; 10:3199–3206.[Medline]
  46. Parys JB, De Smedt H, Missiaen L, Bootman MD, Sienaert I, Casteels R. Rat basophilic leukemia cells as model system for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor IV, a receptor of the type II family: functional comparison and immunological detection. Cell Calcium 1995; 17:239–249.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Parys JB, Sernett SW, DeLisle S, Snyder PM, Welsh MJ, Campbell KP. Isolation, characterization, and localization of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor protein in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:18776–18782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Kume S, Yamamoto A, Inoue T, Muto A, Okano H, Mikoshiba K. Developmental expression of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor and structural changes in the endoplasmic reticulum during oogenesis and meiotic maturation of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 1997; 182:228–239.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Vanlingen S, Parys JB, Missiaen L, De Smedt H, Wuytack R, Casteels R. Distribution of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms, SERCA isoforms and Ca2+-binding proteins in RBL-2H3 rat basophilic leukemia cells. Cell Calcium 1997; 22:475–486.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 27:680–685.
  51. Ducibella T, Rangarajan S, Anderson E. The development of mouse oocyte cortical reaction competence is accompanied by major changes in cortical vesicles and not cortical granule depth. Dev Biol 1988; 130:789–792.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Nicosia S, Wolf DP, Inoue M. Cortical granule distribution and cell surface characteristics in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 1977; 57:56–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Longo FJ, Chen DY. Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: Involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol 1985; 107:382–394.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Stice SL, Robl JM. Activation of mammalian oocytes by a factor obtained from rabbit sperm. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 25:272–280.[CrossRef][Medline]
  55. Parrington J, Swann K, Shevchenko VI, Sesay AK, Lai FA. Calcium oscillations in mammalian eggs triggered by a soluble sperm protein. Nature 1996; 379:364–368.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Swann K, Lai FA. A novel signalling mechanism for generating Ca2+ oscillations at fertilization in mammals. Bioessays 1997; 19:371–378.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Carroll J, Swann K, Whittingham D, Whitaker M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intracellular [Ca2+]i oscillations during the growth and meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Development 1994; 120:3507–3517.[Abstract]
  58. Nakano Y, Shirakawa H, Mitsuhashi N, Kuwabara Y, Miyazaki S. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intracellular calcium in the mouse egg injected with a spermatozoon. Mol Hum Reprod 1997; 3:1087–1093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Parys JB, Bezprozvanny I. The inositol trisphosphate receptor of Xenopus oocytes. Cell Calcium 1995; 18:353–363.[CrossRef][Medline]
  60. Bezprozvanny I, Watras J, Ehrlich BE. Bell-shaped calcium-response curves of Ins(1,4,5)P3- and calcium-gated channels from endoplasmic reticulum of cerebellum. Nature 1991; 351:751–754.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Lechleiter JD, Clapham DE. Molecular mechanisms of intracellular calcium excitability in X. laevis oocytes. Cell 1992; 69:283–294.[CrossRef][Medline]
  62. DeLisle S, Welsh MJ. Inositol trisphosphate is required for the propagation of calcium waves in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:7963–7966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Missiaen L, De Smedt H, Parys JB, Casteels R. Co-activation of inositol trisphosphate induced Ca2+ release by cytosolic Ca2+ is loading-dependent. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:7238–7242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Bootman MD, Missiaen L, Parys JB, De Smedt H, Casteels R. Control of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ release by cytosolic Ca2+. Biochem J 1995; 306:445–451.
  65. Sienaert I, Missiaen L, De Smedt H, Parys JB, Sipma H, Casteels R. Molecular and functional evidence for multiple Ca2+-binding domains in the type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:25899–25906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Monkawa T, Miyawaki A, Sugiyama T, Yoneshima H, Yamamoto-Hino M, Furuichi T, Saruta T, Hasegawa M, Mikoshiba K. Heterotetrameric complex formation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor subunits. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:14700–14704.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Joseph SK, Lin C, Pierson S, Thomas AP, Maranto AR. Heteroligomers of type-I and type-III inositol trisphosphate receptors in WB rat liver epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:23310–23316.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Nucifora CF, Sharp AH, Milgram SL, Ross CA. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in endocrine cells: localization and association in hetero- and homotetramers. Mol Biol Cell 1996; 7:949–960.[Abstract]
  69. Furuichi T, Yoshikawa S, Miyawaki A, Wada K, Maeda N, Mikoshiba K. Primary structure and functional expression of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-binding protein P400. Nature 1989; 342:32–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Kurasawa S, Schultz RM, Kopf GS. Egg-induced modifications of the zona pellucida of mouse eggs: effects of microinjected inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Dev Biol 1989; 133:295–304.[CrossRef][Medline]
  71. Carroll J, Parrington J, Gangeswaran R, De Smedt H, Lai F. Expression of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mRNA and protein in mouse oocytes and embryos. In: XXXIII International Congress of Physiological Sciences; St. Petersburg, Russia; 1997. Abstract P100.14.
  72. Leung PCK, Steele GL. Intracellular signaling in the gonads. Endocr Rev 1992; 13:476–498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Davis JS, Farese RV, Clark MR. Stimulation of phospholipid synthesis by luteinizing hormone in isolated rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1983; 112:2212–2214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Sadighian JJ, Kearns WG, Wadell BJ, Dimino JJ. Effects of a diacylglycerol and inositol trisphosphate on steroidogenesis by ovarian granulosa from pigs. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:294–299.[Abstract]
  75. Hirsch B, Kudo M, Naro F, Conti M, Hsueh AJW. The C-terminal third of the human luteinizing hormone (LH) receptor is important for inositol phosphate release: analysis using chimeric human LH/follicle-stimulating hormone receptors. Mol Endocrinol 1996; 10:1127–1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Anderson E, Albertini DF. Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary. J Cell Biol 1976; 71:680–686.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  77. Gallicano GI, Larabell CA, McGaughey RW, Capco DG. Novel cytoskeletal elements in mammalian eggs are composed of a unique arrangement of intermediate filaments. Mech Dev 1994; 45:211–226.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Malcuit, J. G. Knott, C. He, T. Wainwright, J. B. Parys, J. M. Robl, and R. A. Fissore
Fertilization and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate (IP3)-Induced Calcium Release in Type-1 Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Down-Regulated Bovine Eggs
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 2 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Otsuki, A. Okada, K. Morimoto, Y. Nagai, and H. Kubo
The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1591 - 1597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
S. A. Stricker and T. L. Smythe
Endoplasmic reticulum reorganizations and Ca2+ signaling in maturing and fertilized oocytes of marine protostome worms: the roles of MAPKs and MPF
Development, July 1, 2003; 130(13): 2867 - 2879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
E. Vermassen, K. Van Acker, W. G. Annaert, B. Himpens, G. Callewaert, L. Missiaen, H. De Smedt, and J. B. Parys
Microtubule-dependent redistribution of the type-1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in A7r5 smooth muscle cells
J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2003; 116(7): 1269 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R. Dumollard, K. Hammar, M. Porterfield, P. J. Smith, C. Cibert, C. Rouviere, and C. Sardet
Mitochondrial respiration and Ca2+ waves are linked during fertilization and meiosis completion
Development, February 15, 2003; 130(4): 683 - 692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. T. Y. Chiu, M. S. Rogers, C. Briton-Jones, and C. Haines
Effects of myo-inositol on the in-vitro maturation and subsequent development of mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 408 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Balakier, E. Dziak, A. Sojecki, C. Librach, M. Michalak, and M. Opas
Calcium-binding proteins and calcium-release channels in human maturing oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and early preimplantation embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2938 - 2947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P.T. Goud, A.P. Goud, L. Leybaert, P.V. Oostveldt, K. Mikoshiba, M.P. Diamond, and M. Dhont
Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor function in human oocytes: calcium responses and oocyte activation-related phenomena induced by photolytic release of InsP3 are blocked by a specific antibody to the type I receptor
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 912 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
R. Dumollard, J. Carroll, G. Dupont, and C. Sardet
Calcium wave pacemakers in eggs
J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2002; 115(18): 3557 - 3564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. T. Smyth, A. L. Abbott, B. Lee, I. Sienaert, N. N. Kasri, H. De Smedt, T. Ducibella, L. Missiaen, J. B. Parys, and R. A. Fissore
Inhibition of the Inositol Trisphosphate Receptor of Mouse Eggs and A7r5 Cells by KN-93 via a Mechanism Unrelated to Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase II Antagonism
J. Biol. Chem., September 13, 2002; 277(38): 35061 - 35070.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. L. Abbott, R. A. Fissore, and T. Ducibella
Identification of a Translocation Deficiency in Cortical Granule Secretion in Preovulatory Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1640 - 1647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. L. He, P. Damiani, T. Ducibella, M. Takahashi, K. Tanzawa, J. B. Parys, and R. A. Fissore
Isoforms of the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Receptor Are Expressed in Bovine Oocytes and Ovaries: The Type-1 Isoform Is Down-Regulated by Fertilizationand by Injection of Adenophostin A
Biol Reprod, October 1, 1999; 61(4): 935 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
R. A. Fissore, M. M. Reis, and G. D. Palermo
Sperm-induced calcium oscillations: Isolation of the Ca2+ releasing component(s) of mammalian sperm extracts: the search continues
Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 5(3): 189 - 192.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fissore, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ducibella, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS