Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 290-296 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Progesterone Maintains Large Rat Granulosa Cell Viability Indirectly by Stimulating Small Granulosa Cells to Synthesize Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor1

J.J. Peluso2,a, and A. Pappalardoa

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ovarian follicles are composed of small and large granulosa cells (GCs). Since progesterone (P4) inhibits large GCs from undergoing apoptosis, studies were designed to determine whether both sizes of GCs bind P4. These studies revealed that fluorescein isothiocyanate-BSA-P4 bound only to the surface membranes of small GCs. This binding was steroid-specific and inhibited by an antibody directed against the ligand-binding domain of the nuclear P4 receptor (PR). In addition, a cell-impermeable derivative of P4, BSA-conjugated P4, was as effective as P4 in preventing apoptosis. Quantitative in situ hybridization studies showed that P4 increased the relative amount of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) mRNA expressed per cell as well as the percentage of small GCs that expressed bFGF. To determine whether the anti-apoptotic action of P4 was mediated by bFGF, GCs were cultured in control medium supplemented with either P4, a neutralizing antibody to bFGF, or both P4 and the bFGF antibody. The results from this study demonstrated that P4 suppressed apoptosis and that this effect was attenuated in presence of the bFGF antibody. Basic FGF also prevented GC apoptosis, and its action was not influenced by either the PR antagonist (RU-486), an inhibitor of P4 synthesis (aminoglutethimide), or a PR antibody. Finally, FGF receptors were detected on both small and large GCs. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that P4 acts through a putative membrane receptor on small GCs to stimulate the synthesis of bFGF. Basic FGF then activates its receptors within large GCs, and this initiates a signal transduction pathway that maintains large GC viability.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Numerous factors inhibit granulosa cell (GC) apoptosis and thereby maintain the viability of ovarian follicles [1, 2]. These anti-apoptotic factors represent a diverse group of biological regulators, including peptide hormones, growth factors, cytokines, and steroids [3]. How these factors interact to promote GC viability is not known. It is possible that each factor or combination of factors is synthesized and secreted at a specific stage of follicular development and/or during a unique physiological state (i.e., different stages of the reproductive cycle, ovulation, pregnancy, lactation). Alternatively, these factors could be organized in a cascade, with the expression of one factor leading to the expression of another until the last factor in the sequence activates a signal transduction pathway that maintains the viability of the GCs.

While these possibilities are not mutually exclusive, evidence to support the concept of a hormone-growth factor cascade has been developed. Many studies have shown that gonadotropins act directly through their receptors within GCs to promote steroidogenesis [4]. In addition, gonadotropins stimulate both thecal cells and GCs to secrete various growth factors, which in turn modulate ovarian steroidogenesis [5]. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a growth factor that not only promotes GC progesterone (P4) secretion [6, 7] but also inhibits GC apoptosis [7]. However, the anti-apoptotic action of EGF is not observed in the presence of either the P4 receptor antagonist, RU-486 or the P4 synthesis inhibitor, aminoglutethimide [7]. Aminoglutethimide blockage of EGF's action can be overcome by P4 [7]. Collectively, these data indicate that 1) there exists a gonadotropin-induced cascade of hormones and growth factors that ultimately maintains GC viability, and 2) P4 is an important component of this anti-apoptotic cascade.

Attempts to understand the actions of P4 are complicated by the fact that ovarian follicles are composed of two different sizes of GCs [6, 8, 9]. Small GCs are relatively undifferentiated and have a limited steroidogenic capacity [6, 8, 9]. Large GCs are steroidogenic, capable of secreting both estrogen and P4 [6, 8, 9]. Interestingly, only large GCs undergo apoptosis in vitro [7]. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that P4 regulates large GC viability via an autocrine mechanism, not requiring the presence of small GCs. The first series of studies in our present report were designed to explore the autocrine hypothesis by determining whether large GCs were able to bind P4. The binding studies revealed that only small GCs bind P4. This observation argues against an autocrine mechanism and suggests that P4 mediates its action through a paracrine mechanism. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is important in regulating ovarian function, influencing a wide range of biological functions. These include promoting bovine GC mitosis [10, 11] and attenuating FSH-induced steroidogenesis from bovine [12], chicken [13], and rat [14] GCs. In addition, bFGF inhibits rat GC apoptosis [15, 16]. Since bFGF plays a role in regulating rat GC apoptosis and P4 induces bFGF expression in uterine cells [17, 18], our second series of studies focused on the relationship between P4 and bFGF.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Immature female Wistar rats (22 days of age) were obtained from Charles River Laboratory (Wilmington, MA) and housed under controlled conditions of temperature, humidity, and photoperiod (12L:12D; lights-on at 0700 h). On the day of the experiment, immature animals were 23 days of age. The rats were killed by cervical dislocation between 0930 and 1000 h, the ovaries were removed, and GCs were isolated. This protocol was approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of Connecticut Health Center.

Granulosa Cell Isolation and Culture

GCs were isolated according to the procedure of Lederer et al. [9]. For the apoptosis experiments, large GC populations were isolated by Percoll-gradient centrifugation [9]. The large GC population included approximately 20% small GCs. For all experiments, the GCs were washed, resuspended in RPMI-1640, and plated in Lab-Tek 8-chamber slides (Nunc Inc., Naperville, IL).

All steroids were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), made as stock solutions in ethanol at 1 mg/ml, and then diluted in RPMI-1640 to the desired final concentration. P4 receptor (PR) antibody (C-262; StressGen, Victoria, BC) was added to cultures at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml except for the fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-BSA-P4 binding study, in which the concentration was increased to 20 µg/400 µl. Depending on the experimental design, bFGF (5 ng/ml) or a goat anti-human bFGF antibody (100 µg/ml) were added to the cultures. Basic FGF and its antibody were purchased from R&D (Minneapolis, MN). Aminoglutethimide was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. and was used at a concentration of 0.5 mM. RU-486 was provided by Rousel-UCLAF (Romainville, France) and was used at a concentration of 64 µM.

Localization of P4 Binding Sites Using FITC-BSA-P4

GCs were plated at 1.5 x 105 cells/400 µl and incubated for 30 min at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air with RPMI-1640 (ethanol-supplemented control medium) or medium supplemented with either P4 (35 µg) or PR antibody (20 µg). FITC-BSA-P4 (10 µg; Sigma Chemical Co.) was then added to the medium, and the cells were incubated for an additional 30 min. GCs were then washed twice with PBS and observed under phase and epifluorescent optics with the FITC filter set and a 40x SPlan objective (0.70 n.a.). Both phase and fluorescent images were captured with a Dage 72 CCD camera (Dage-MTI, Michigan City, IN) as grey-scale images, and the images were stored in a computer. The density units for the fluorescent images were linear over a range of 0–255 U/pixel. The relative amount of FITC-BSA-P4 binding was assessed by determining the fluorescent intensity of each small GC using IP Lab-Spectrum software (Signal Analytics Corp., Vienna, VA). The cell size (area) and mean fluorescent intensity (fluorescent intensity per pixel) of each cell was determined from the fluorescent images, with phase images used to verify the position of each cell. The background fluorescent intensity was then calculated for each treatment and subtracted from the mean fluorescent intensity of each cell. A similar study was also conducted in which FITC-BSA-P4 binding was assessed in the absence (ethanol control) or presence of 200 µM P4, estradiol-17ß, or testosterone.

A confocal microscopy study was conducted to determine whether FITC-BSA-P4 exclusively binds to the surface membrane. For this study, GCs were exposed to FITC-BSA-P4 for 30 min as previously described and then washed with fresh medium and incubated for an additional 15 min. The cells were observed under a Zeiss confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM 410; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using an oil achrostigmat 40x (1.3 n.a.) objective with an excitation at 488 nm and an LP 515 filter. As a control, GCs were incubated with FITC-BSA-P4 and nonlabeled P4 as previously described.

Detection and Quantitation of bFGF mRNA byIn Situ Hybridization

After 24 h of culture in either control or P4-supplemented medium, GCs were fixed with 10% formalin in PBS for 5 min. Formalin was removed with two rinses of PBS. Slides were then treated with 2% Tween in deionized water for 30 min and then rinsed in running tap water for 30 min. Slides were washed in 95% ethanol twice for 5 min each, rinsed twice with deionized water, and dried overnight on a slide warmer at 42°C in a dust-free environment.

Each slide was prehybridized at 42°C for 30 min with 50 µl of 55% formamide, 6-strength SSC (single-strength SSC is 0.15 M sodium chloride, 0.015 M sodium citrate), and 5-strength Denhardt's solution supplemented with 100 µg herring sperm DNA. In situ hybridization was carried out using the following 5' digoxigenin-labeled bFGF antisense oligonucleotide prepared by National Biosciences (Plymouth, MN): 5'-GAC ACA ACC CCT CTC TCT TCT GCT TC-3'. This probe was previously described [19]. As a control, a 5' digoxigenin-labeled non-sense oligonucleotide was used [20]. The slides were processed as described by Shapiro et al. [20]. Basic FGF mRNA was revealed by the presence of a blue staining reaction product. Because of the extremely low background, cells were observed and photographed with the iris diaphragm closed in order to visualize both blue-stained and nonstained cells. Once the location of all cells was determined, the iris diaphragm was opened, and images were captured as previously described [20]. These images were used to quantitate the amount of blue reaction product (i.e., bFGF mRNA). Previously, it has been shown that the amount of staining was proportional to the amount of mRNA detected (r2 = 0.9).

Immunocytochemical Localization of FGF Receptors

GCs were plated at 1 x 105 cells/well for 2 h, rinsed once with PBS, fixed with 10% buffered formalin for 10 min, and then rinsed twice in PBS. FGF receptors were localized using the Kirkegaard and Perry Histomark Streptavidin HRP kit (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaitherburg, MD) and the Histomark Orange horseradish peroxidase conjugate reporter system. Incubations and Tris-buffered saline (pH 7.6) washes were done at room temperature. Briefly, cells were incubated with serum provided in the kit for 15 min to reduce nonspecific staining. The serum was then removed, and the GCs were incubated with an antibody to FGF Receptor (1:1000; UBI, Lake Placid, NY) for 1 h. Cells were then washed three times for 5 min per wash. Biotinylated antibody was then added, and the cells were incubated for 1 h. The cells were subsequently washed three times. Streptavidin was added, and the cells were incubated for an additional 1 h and again washed three times. Color development proceeded for 5 min using a substrate solution of diaminobenzidine (DAB). The chambers were removed from Lab-Tek slides, and the slides were dehydrated in ethanol, washed in Histoclear, and coverslipped with Permount (Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, PA). The presence of FGF receptors was detected by an orange-brown stain. As a negative control, cells were stained as outlined above with the exception that the primary antibody was omitted.

Assessment of Apoptosis

Large GC fractions were plated at a plating density of 7 x 104 cells/400 µl. GCs were cultured in RPMI-1640 (control) supplemented with P4 (64 nM), bFGF antibody, or P4 plus bFGF antibody. Cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air and then stained with hydroethidine (14 µg/ml of PBS; Polyscience, Inc., Warrington, PA) [7]. The cells were then observed under epifluorescence using the rhodamine filter set, and the percentage of apoptotic single cells was determined as previously described [7]. Only single cells were evaluated, since the viability of aggregated cells is maintained through a P4-independent mechanism [21]. A similar study was conducted in which GCs were cultured with control medium supplemented with bFGF in the presence or absence of aminoglutethimide, RU-486, or PR antibody. To control for nonspecific effects of either the bFGF or PR antibody, some control and treatment groups were supplemented with the appropriate amounts of IgG. Finally, studies were conducted using BSA-conjugated P4 and dexamethasone. These steroids were used at a concentration of 64 nM.

Statistical Analysis

Except for those involving apoptosis, all experiments were run in duplicate. Apoptosis studies were conducted in quadruplicate. Each experiment was replicated at least three times. Where appropriate, data were evaluated by an ANOVA followed by a Student-Neuman-Kuels procedure. A value of p <= 0.05 was considered to be significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
P4 binding was assessed using a cell-impermeable fluorescent-labeled derivative of P4. When observed under standard epifluorescent optics, FITC-BSA-P4 bound to small but not to large GCs (Fig. 1). Compared to that of controls, this binding was inhibited in the presence of nonlabeled P4 (p < 0.05) and the PR antibody (p < 0.05; Fig. 1). In contrast, testosterone did not inhibit FITC-BSA-P4 binding (Fig. 2). Although estradiol-17ß suppressed FITC-BSA-P4 binding by about 25% compared to control values (p < 0.05), it was not as effective as nonlabeled P4, which suppressed FITC-BSA-P4 binding by about 64% (Fig. 2). Further observations using the confocal microscope revealed that FITC-BSA-P4 bound only to the surface membranes and was not detected within the nuclei of small GCs (Fig. 3). This binding was completely inhibited by the addition of nonlabeled P4 (Fig. 3).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The localization and quantitation of FITC-BSA-P4 binding to rat GCs. A phase image of 5 small GCs (at the left) and 3 large GCs (at the right) is shown in the upper micrograph. A fluorescent image of these cells is shown in the lower micrograph. Note that only the small GCs fluoresce, indicating that they have bound the FITC-BSA-P4. The graph depicts the relative amount of FITC-BSA-P4 binding as expressed as fluorescent intensity. Values in this and subsequent graphs represent the mean ± one standard error. x325.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The steroid specificity of FITC-BSA-P4 binding to small GCs. P4 (Prog) significantly suppressed FITC-BSA-P4 binding compared to all other groups (*p < 0.05). Estradiol-17ß (Est) also suppressed FITC-BSA-P4 binding but to a lesser degree than P4. Although the amount of FITC-BSA-P4 binding after treatment with estradiol-17ß was less than control, it was statistically equal to that observed with testosterone (Test) treatment, which was not less than control. Further, the amount of FITC-BSA-P4 binding after estradiol 17ß treatment was significantly greater than that observed after P4 treatment.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Localization of FITC-BSA-P4 by confocal fluorescent microscopy. Paired differential interference contrast (A, C) and confocal fluorescent (B, D) images of several small GCs. The cells shown in A and B were exposed to FITC-BSA-P4, washed with fresh medium, incubated for 15 min at room temperature and then examined. The small GCs shown in C and D were incubated as described except that the FITC-BSA-P4 supplemented medium also contained nonlabeled P4. As can be seen by comparing B with D, nonlabeled P4 completely blocked FITC-BSA-P4 from binding to the small GCs. In addition, FITC-BSA-P4 binding was localized to the cell membrane and was not observed in the nucleus of these cells. This is best observed in the cell in B marked with an arrow. Some cells in B may appear to show FITC-BSA-P4 within the nucleus. However, not all the cells shown in B are in the same focal plane, since they were plated for less than an 1 h. Finally, it is important to appreciated that this procedure was done on living cells that had not been permeabilized.

Since FITC-BSA-P4 was not observed within the nuclei of small GCs, it was possible that P4 mediated its action through an interaction with a membrane-associated protein. To test this hypothesis, the ability of a cell-impermeable form of P4, BSA-conjugated P4, to prevent GC apoptosis was assessed. As shown in Figure 4, BSA-conjugated P4 was as effective in preventing GC apoptosis as P4. Further, P4's anti-apoptotic actions could not be mimicked by dexamethasone (Fig. 4).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. The effect of P4, BSA-conjugated P4, and dexamethasone on the percentage of single apoptotic GCs. In this and all subsequent graphs involving apoptosis, the steroids were used at 64 nM. *Value significantly different from control (p < 0.05).

When the non-sense probe was used in the in situ hybridization protocol, GCs did not stain (Fig. 5A) However, the antisense bFGF probe detected mRNA for bFGF in 10 ± 3% of small GCs that were cultured under control conditions (Fig. 5, B and C). P4 increased the percentage of small GCs that expressed bFGF to 37 ± 1% (Fig. 5C; p < 0.05) and increased the amount of bFGF mRNA expressed per cell to nearly twofold (p < 0.05; Fig. 5D). To determine whether P4 mediates its action by stimulating bFGF synthesis, GCs were cultured with control medium supplemented with P4, bFGF antibody, or both. In this study, P4 suppressed apoptosis, and this action was completely attenuated by the neutralizing antibody to bFGF (Fig. 6). This antibody has also been shown to neutralize bFGF's anti-apoptotic effects [16].



View larger version (98K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. The effect of P4 treatment on bFGF mRNA levels as assessed by in situ hybridization. A) GCs probed using a non-sense probe as outlined in the Materials and Methods section (negative control); B) GCs probed with the bFGF antisense probe. Note the relative absence of staining when the non-sense probe is used (A). Specific staining for bFGF mRNA is almost exclusively observed in the small (Sm) but not large (Lg) GCs shown in B. P4 treatment resulted in an increase in the percentage of small GCs that expressed bFGF (C). In addition, the relative amount of bFGF mRNA was increased for those cells that expressed bFGF (D). Photographs were taken with the iris diaphragm closed in order to visualize both stained and nonstained cells and are shown at a magnification of x233. The quantitation of in situ staining reaction was conducted on images that were captured with the iris diaphragm open. The data shown in C and D represent the results obtained from approximately 300 cells/treatment collected from three different experiments.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. The effect of P4 (prog) and an antibody to bFGF (Ab-bFGF) on the percentage of single apoptotic GCs. *Value significantly different from control (p < 0.05).

Since the possibility exists that bFGF could stimulate P4 synthesis, we assessed the ability of bFGF to maintain GC viability in the presence of aminoglutethimide, a P4 synthesis inhibitor, and RU-486, a PR antagonist. Neither of these agents inhibited the ability of bFGF to prevent GC apoptosis (Fig. 7). Similarly, the PR antibody did not influence the anti-apoptotic action of bFGF (Fig. 7).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. The effect of aminoglutethimide (AG), RU-486 (left), and the antibody to PR (Ab-PR; right) on the ability of bFGF to inhibit GC apoptosis.

The previous data indicate that bFGF mediates P4's anti-apoptotic actions. Although rat GCs express FGF receptors [22, 23], studies have not determined whether both small and large GCs express these receptors. To address this issue, immunocytochemical studies were conducted. These studies revealed that FGF receptors were expressed by both small and large GCs (Fig. 8).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Localization of the FGF receptor in GCs isolated from immature rats. Left) Cells stained in the absence of the primary antibody (i.e., negative control). Right) Both small (sm) and large (lg) GCs stained with the primary antibody show an intense staining reaction, indicating that they express the FGF receptor. x200.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although GCs of immature and developing follicles do not express the nuclear PR [2427], these cells possess a P4-binding protein that could function as a PR [2831]. By using FITC-BSA-P4, a cell-impermeable derivative of P4, and conventional and confocal fluorescent microscopy, the studies described here demonstrated that P4 binds exclusively to the surface membranes of small GCs. This binding was inhibited by P4 but not by other steroids. These observations suggest that a P4-binding protein is selectively expressed and localized to the surface membranes of small GCs. P4 binding was also inhibited by an antibody directed against the ligand-binding domain of the PR. In order for the PR antibody to interfere with FITC-BSA-P4 binding, it would have to interact at the surface membrane, since the antibody is not incorporated into the GCs. Further, the PR antibody detects a 60-kDa P4-binding protein that is present within the surface membranes of ovarian cells [31]. It is likely, then, that FITC-BSA-P4 binds to the P4-binding site of this 60-kDa protein. Taken together, these observations are consistent with the hypothesis that P4 acts through a putative membrane receptor for P4. Further support for a membrane site of action is provided by the observation that a cell-impermeable P4 derivative, BSA-conjugated P4, mimics P4's anti-apoptotic action.

Caution must be used in proposing the existence of a membrane receptor for P4. An alternative possibility could be that P4 acts though a glucocorticoid receptor, which is present within the rat ovary [32] and can be activated or antagonized by P4 and RU-486, respectively [33]. Recent studies have shown that P4 down-regulates the expression of 20{alpha}-hydrosteroid dehydrogenase within rat luteal cells and that this action is mediated through the glucocorticoid receptor [32]. While it is likely that some of P4's intraovarian actions are transduced through the glucocorticoid receptor, the present study demonstrates that dexamethasone does not mimic P4's anti-apoptotic action. Similarly, previous studies have shown that dexamethasone does not have P4's anti-mitotic activity [34]. On the basis of these studies, it is unlikely that P4's anti-mitotic and anti-apoptotic actions in rat GCs are mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor. Rather, the data to date suggests that a membrane receptor for P4 exists and is expressed exclusively by small GCs.

Since FITC-BSA-P4 binds only to small GCs, P4 appears to act directly on small GCs. This direct action could account for P4's ability to prevent the insulin-induced expression of the immediate/early genes, c-fos and c-jun [35], and small GC mitosis [34]. In contrast to its direct action on small GCs, P4 most likely maintains the viability of large GCs through a paracrine mechanism that is mediated by bFGF. This concept is supported by the following observations. First, P4 does not bind to large GCs. Second, P4 selectively acts on small GCs to increase the amount of bFGF mRNA synthesized per cell as well as the number of small GCs that express bFGF mRNA. Third, the neutralizing antibody to bFGF completely prevents P4 from maintaining the viability of GCs. In addition, the bFGF-activated signal transduction pathway does not require enhanced P4 secretion to maintain GC viability. This conclusion is based on the findings that neither aminoglutethimide, an inhibitor of P4 synthesis; RU-486, a PR antagonist; nor the PR antibody abrogate bFGF's ability to preserve large GC viability. Collectively, these observations indicate that P4 induces bFGF synthesis within small GCs. Basic FGF then binds to its receptors on the surface membranes of large GCs and activates a signal transduction pathway that preserves large GC viability.

The relationship between P4 and bFGF expression may play a central role in regulating GC viability, thereby preventing follicular atresia in vivo. As follicles develop, their ability to synthesize P4 increases [4]. This increase in P4 parallels the increase in bFGF expression [19]. On the basis of the present in vitro studies, it is likely that the increase in bFGF expression that occurs during follicle growth is due to the increase in intrafollicular levels of P4. Similarly, studies by Rider and associates [17, 18] reveal that P4 stimulates bFGF expression in the stromal cells of the uterus. These in vivo studies support the concept that the P4-bFGF paracrine relationship, observed in vitro, also exists in vivo. In vivo, P4's role as a physiological survival factor has been confirmed by the observations that RU-486 treatment induced follicular cysts and/or atresia when injected into either intact adult rats [36] or diethylstilbestrol (DES)-primed hypophysectomized immature rats [37].

The present study demonstrates that P4 promotes bFGF expression, which in turn maintains GC viability. However, the paracrine relationship between P4 and bFGF is only a small segment of a complex hormonal and growth factor cascade that regulates the viability of GCs in vivo. This cascade can be divided into steroidogenesis-enhancing and steroidogenesis-independent segments. Most of the anti-apoptotic hormones and growth factors that have been identified to date enhance steroidogenesis. For example, both FSH and LH prevent GC apoptosis and promote P4 secretion [1]. In addition, FSH also stimulates estrogen synthesis, and estrogen has been shown to prevent GC apoptosis in vivo [38]. In addition, gonadotropins stimulate the synthesis of growth factors such as epidermal growth factor (EGF). EGF could facilitate GC P4 secretion in vitro, with P4 secretion accounting for EGF's anti-apoptotic effects [7]. P4 secretion from rat GCs is also increased by other anti-apoptotic growth factors such as transforming growth factor {alpha} [6], vasoactive intestinal peptide [39], growth hormone [40], and interleukin-1ß [41]. It is not known whether these growth factors mediate their anti-apoptotic action solely by increasing P4 synthesis. Conversely, insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) reduce P4 production but prevent GCs of cultured follicles from undergoing apoptosis [42]. Interestingly, both insulin and IGF-I increase bFGF synthesis in nonovarian tissue [43]. The possibility exists, then, that insulin and/or IGF-1 increase bFGF expression within small GCs, thereby bypassing the P4-dependent segment of the anti-apoptosis cascade. While the present study identifies the P4-bFGF axis as a central component of the paracrine communication network that maintains GC viability, it remains to be determined whether bFGF is the last growth factor in this hormonal-growth factor cascade. Further, it is important to appreciate that there may also exist additional anti-apoptotic pathways that do not involve either P4 or bFGF.

One such mechanism is mediated by N-cadherin cell contact [16, 21]. This cell contact mechanism is sufficient to maintain cell viability independent of various survival factors such as P4 or bFGF [16, 21]. However, cell contact is not always maintained between GCs of healthy follicles. For example, cell contacts are likely to be reduced during mitosis or as a result of an increase in the size of the antrum. It is proposed that at times when GC contact is reduced, exposure to various survival factors (i.e., P4, bFGF, etc.) maintains GC viability until cell contact is reestablished.

This paracrine interaction between small and large GCs, which is mediated by P4 and bFGF, is important in that it predicts that small GCs are essential for the survival of large GCs. Interestingly, both small and large GCs are present within the same follicle [8], but small GCs do not appear to die via an apoptotic mechanism [7]. The factors that regulate small GC viability have not been identified. In this regard, the nonapoptotic death of the small GCs could eventually lead to the large GCs' undergoing apoptosis. Further, selective destruction of large GCs by activation of the apoptotic pathway could result in the proliferation of small GCs, since their proliferation is negatively regulated by the P4 [34], which is secreted by the large GCs [6, 8, 9]. These two predictions are important to our overall understanding of follicular function and require intensive testing and validation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors are grateful to Dr. Bruce A. White for his thoughtful advice throughout the course of this study and to Dr. Mark Trolice for his help in conducting some of the experiments. The authors are grateful to Madame M. Garnier of Rousel-UCLAF for the gift of the RU-486.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported in part by a Faculty Research Grant from the University of CT Health Center Research Foundation and NIH grant RO1-HD 33467–01A2. Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 860 679 1228; peluso{at}nso2.uchc.edu Back

Accepted: September 9, 1998.

Received: December 2, 1997.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hsueh A, Billig H, Tsafriri A. Ovarian follicle atresia: a hormonally controlled apoptotic process. Endocr Rev 1994; 15:707–724.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Martimbeau S, Tilly JL. Physiological cell death in endocrine-dependent tissues: an ovarian perspective. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1997; 46:241–254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Hsu SY, Hsueh AJW. Hormonal regulation of apoptosis: an ovarian perspective. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1997; 8:207–213.[Medline]
  4. Gore-Langton RE, Armstrong DT. Follicular steroidogenesis and its control. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1988: 331–386.
  5. Tsafriri A. Local nonsteroidal regulators of ovarian function. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1988: 527–566.
  6. Sanbuissho A, Lee GY, Anderson E. Functional and ultrastructural characteristics of two types of rat granulosa cell cultured in the presence of FSH or transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-alpha). J Reprod Fertil 1993; 98:367–376.[Abstract]
  7. Luciano AM, Pappalardo A, Ray C, Peluso JJ. Epidermal growth factor inhibits large granulosa cell apoptosis by stimulating progesterone synthesis and regulating the distribution of intracellular free calcium. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:646–654.[Abstract]
  8. Rao IM, Mills TM, Anderson E, Mahesh VB. Heterogeneity in granulosa cells of developing rat follicles. Anat Rec 1991; 229:177–185.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lederer K, Luciano A, Pappalardo A, Peluso J. Proliferative and steroidogenic capabilities of different-sized rat granulosa cells. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 103:47–54.[Abstract]
  10. Lavranos TC, Rodgers HF, Bertoncello I, Rodgers RJ. Anchorage-independent culture of bovine granulosa cells: the effects of basic fibroblast growth factor and dibutyryl cAMP on cell division and differentiation. Exp Cell Res 1994; 211:245–251.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Rodgers RJ, Vella CA, Rodgers HF, Scott K, Lavranos TC. Production of extracellular matrix, fibronectin and steroidogenic enzymes, and growth of bovine granulosa cells in anchorage-independent culture. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996; 8:249–257.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Vernon RK, Spicer LJ. Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor and heparin on follicle-stimulating hormone-induced steroidogenesis by bovine granulosa cells. J Anim Sci 1994; 72:2696–2702.[Abstract]
  13. Li Z, Johnson AL. Expression and regulation of cytochrome P450 17alpha-hydroxylase messenger ribonucleic acid levels and androstenedione production in hen granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:1293–1302.[Abstract]
  14. Yamoto M, Shikone T, Nakano R. Opposite effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on gonadotropin-stimulated steroidogenesis in rat granulosa cells. Endocr J 1993; 40:691–697.[Medline]
  15. Tilly JL, Billig H, Kowalski KI, Hsueh A. Epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor suppress the spontaneous onset of apoptosis in cultured rat ovarian granulosa cells and follicles by a tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanism. Mol Endocrinol 1992; 6:1942–1950.[Abstract]
  16. Trolice MP, Pappalardo A, Peluso JJ. Basic fibroblast growth factor and N-cadherin maintain rat granulosa cell and ovarian surface epithelial cell viability by stimulating the tyrosine phosphorylation of the fibroblast growth factor receptors. Endocrinology 1997; 138:107–113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Rider V, Psychoyos A. Inhibition of progesterone receptor function results in loss of basic fibroblast growth factor expression and stromal cell proliferation during uterine remodelling in the pregnant rat. J Endocrinol 1994; 140:239–249.[Abstract]
  18. Rider V, Carlone DL, Foster RT. Oestrogen and progesterone control basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA in the rat uterus. J Endocrinol 1997; 154:75–84.[Abstract]
  19. Guthridge M, Bertolini J, Cowling J, Hern MTW. Localization of bFGF mRNA in cyclic rat ovary, diethylstilbesterol primed rat ovary, and cultured rat granulosa cells. Growth Factors 1992; 7:15–25.[Medline]
  20. Shapiro DB, Pappalardo A, White BA, Peluso JJ. Steroidogenic factor-1 as a positive regulator of rat granulosa cell differentiation and a negative regulator of mitosis. Endocrinology 1996; 137:1187–1195.[Abstract]
  21. Peluso JJ, Pappalardo A, Trolice MP. N-Cadherin-mediated cell contact inhibits granulosa cell apoptosis in a progesterone-independent manner. Endocrinology 1996; 137:1196–1203.[Abstract]
  22. Koos RD, Olson CE. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor in the rat ovary: detection of mRNA using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction amplification. Mol Endocrinol 1989; 3:2041–2048.[Abstract]
  23. Shikone T, Yamoto M, Nakano R. Follicle-stimulating hormone induces functional receptors for basic fibroblast growth factor in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1992; 131:1063–1068.[Abstract]
  24. Natraj U, Richards JS. Hormonal regulation, localization, and functional activity of the progesterone receptor in granulosa cells of rat preovulatory follicles. Endocrinology 1993; 133:761–769.[Abstract]
  25. Park OK, Mayo KE. Transient expression of progesterone receptor messenger RNA in ovarian granulosa cells after the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Mol Endocrinol 1991; 5:967–978.[Abstract]
  26. Park-Sarge OK, Mayo KE. Regulation of the progesterone receptor gene by gonadotropins and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1994; 134:709–718.[Abstract]
  27. Park-Sarge OK, Parmer TG, Gu Y, Gibori G. Does the rat corpus luteum express the progesterone receptor gene? Endocrinology 1995; 136:1537–1543.[Abstract]
  28. Schreiber JR, Hsueh AJW. Progesterone "receptor" in rat ovary. Endocrinology 1979; 105:915–925.[Abstract]
  29. Schreiber JR, Erickson GF. Progesterone receptor in the rat ovary: further characterization and localization in the granulosa cell. Steroids 1979; 34:459–469.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Peluso JJ. Placing progesterone in the apoptotic pathway. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1997; 8:267–271.[Medline]
  31. Peluso JJ, Pappalardo A. Progesterone mediates its anti-mitogenic and anti-apoptotic actions in rat granulosa cells through a progesterone binding protein with GABAA receptor-like features. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1131–1137.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sugino N, Telleria CM, Gibori G. Progesterone inhibits 20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase expression in the rat corpus luteum through the glucocorticoid receptor. Endocrinology 1997; 138:4497–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Savouret JF, Misrahi M, Loosfelt H, Atger M, Baily A, Perrot-Applanat M, Vu Hai MT, Guiochon-Mantel A, Jolivet A, Lorenzo F. Molecular and cellular biology of mammalian progesterone receptors. Recent Prog Horm Res 1989; 48:65–120.
  34. Luciano AM, Peluso JJ. The effect of in vivo gonadotropin treatment on the ability of progesterone, estrogen, and cyclic AMP to inhibit insulin-dependent granulosa cell mitosis in vitro. Biol Reprod 1995; 55:664–669.
  35. Peluso JJ, Luciano AM, Pappalardo A, White BW. Cellular and molecular mechanisms that mediate insulin-dependent rat granulosa cell mitosis. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:124–130.[Abstract]
  36. Sánchez CJ, Tébar M, Sánchez A, Gaytán F. Evidence that androgens are involved in atresia and anovulation induced by antiprogesterone RU486 in rats. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 99:173–179.[Abstract]
  37. Sánchez CJ, Sánchez A, Ruiz A, Gaytán F. Endocrine and morphological features of cystic ovarian condition in antiprogesterone RU486-treated rats. Acta Endocrinol Copenh 1993; 129:237–245.[Medline]
  38. Billig H, Furuta I, Hsueh A. Estrogens inhibit and androgens enhance ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis. Endocrinology 1993; 133:2204–2212.[Abstract]
  39. Li YD, Kasson BG. Androgens augment vasoactive intestinal peptide- and growth hormone-releasing hormone-stimulated progestin production by rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1993; 132:584–590.[Abstract]
  40. Apa R, Lanzone A, Miceli F, Caruso A, Mancuso S, Canipari R. Growth hormone induction of rat granulosa cell tissue-plasminogen activator expression and progesterone synthesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1994; 99:153–159.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Northnick WB, Curry TE. Divergent effects of interleukin-1 beta on steroidogenesis and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor expression and activity in cultured rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1996; 137:3784–3790.[Abstract]
  42. Chun SY, Billig H, Tilly JL, Furuta I, Tsafriri A, Hsueh A. Gonadotropin suppression of apoptosis in cultured preovulatory follicles: mediatory role of endogenous insulin-like growth factor I. Endocrinology 1994; 135:1845–1853.[Abstract]
  43. Yamashita H, Oh-ishi S, Kizaki T, Saitoh D, Ohira Y, Ohno H. Insulin stimulates the expression of basic fibroblast growth factor in rat brown adipocyte primary culture. Eur J Cell Biol 1995; 68:8–13.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
L.-M. Chen, R.-S. Wang, Y.-F. Lee, N.-C. Liu, Y.-J. Chang, C.-C. Wu, S. Xie, Y.-C. Hung, and C. Chang
Subfertility with Defective Folliculogenesis in Female Mice Lacking Testicular Orphan Nuclear Receptor 4
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 22(4): 858 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. E. Drummond, M. Tellbach, M. Dyson, and J. K. Findlay
Fibroblast Growth Factor-9, a Local Regulator of Ovarian Function
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3711 - 3721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Asimakopoulos, F. Koster, R. Felberbaum, S. Al-Hasani, K. Diedrich, and N. Nikolettos
Cytokine and hormonal profile in blood serum and follicular fluids during ovarian stimulation with the multidose antagonist or the long agonist protocol
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3091 - 3095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, R. Losel, and M. Wehling
Expression and Function of PAIRBP1 Within Gonadotropin-Primed Immature Rat Ovaries: PAIRBP1 Regulation of Granulosa and Luteal Cell Viability
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2005; 73(2): 261 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. J. Peluso, A. Pappalardo, G. Fernandez, and C. A. Wu
Involvement of an Unnamed Protein, RDA288, in the Mechanism through which Progesterone Mediates Its Antiapoptotic Action in Spontaneously Immortalized Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 3014 - 3022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, T. Bremner, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and B.A. White
Expression Pattern and Role of a 60-Kilodalton Progesterone Binding Protein in Regulating Granulosa Cell Apoptosis: Involvement of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 122 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. A. Goyeneche, R. P. Deis, G. Gibori, and C. M. Telleria
Progesterone Promotes Survival of the Rat Corpus Luteum in the Absence of Cognate Receptors
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 151 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and B.A. White
Membrane-Initiated Events Account for Progesterone's Ability to Regulate Intracellular Free Calcium Levels and Inhibit Rat Granulosa Cell Mitosis
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2002; 67(2): 379 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.J. Peluso, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and B.A. White
Characterization of a Putative Membrane Receptor for Progesterone in Rat Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 94 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Lynch, G. Fernandez, A. Pappalardo, and J. J. Peluso
Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Inhibits Apoptosis of Spontaneously Immortalized Granulosa Cells by Regulating Intracellular Free Calcium Levels through a Protein Kinase C{delta}-Dependent Pathway
Endocrinology, November 1, 2000; 141(11): 4209 - 4217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Y. Yang and R. Rajamahendran
Involvement of Apoptosis in the Atresia of Nonovulatory Dominant Follicle During the Bovine Estrous Cycle
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2000; 63(5): 1313 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E.Ch. Svensson, E. Markström, M. Andersson, and H. Billig
Progesterone Receptor-Mediated Inhibition of Apoptosis in Granulosa Cells Isolated from Rats Treated with Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2000; 63(5): 1457 - 1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Peluso, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Pappalardo, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS