Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 534-539 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Cryopreservation of Bovine Pre-Morula-Stage In Vitro Matured/In Vitro Fertilized Embryos after Delipidation and before Use in Nucleus Transfer

Hitoshi Ushijima1,a, Hirohito Yamakawab, and Hiroshi Nagashima2,c

a Chiba Prefectural Mineoka Dairy Experimental Station, Chiba 299-2507, Japan b Nasu Institute, Nisshin Flour Milling Co. Ltd., Nasu, Tochigi 329-2763, Japan c Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We have determined that the tolerance of in vitro matured/in vitro fertilized (IVM/IVF) bovine embryos to cryopreservation at the pre-morula stage can be improved by removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets by centrifugation. Nucleus transfer was also performed using cryopreserved, delipated (lipid droplets removed) 8- to 16-cell-stage blastomeres of IVM/IVF embryos as donor nuclei. In vitro developmental ability of the delipated embryos to the blastocyst stage (20 of 126) was found to be equal to that of undelipated embryos (35 of 176); and of 53 delipated embryos cryopreserved at the 8- to 16-cell stage, 12 developed into blastocysts in vitro after thawing. On the other hand, only 2 of 43 undelipated embryos and 5 of 59 sham-operated embryos survived (p < 0.05). When blastomeres isolated from cryopreserved, delipated 8- to 16-cell-stage embryos were used for nucleus transfer, 57 of 80 successfully fused with enucleated oocytes, which was significantly lower than the fusion rate obtained with blastomeres of unfrozen, undelipated embryos (93 of 104, p < 0.01). However, the developmental rate to the blastocyst stage for nucleus transfer embryos reconstituted with frozen, delipated blastomeres (9 of 57) was not different from that of the nucleus transfer embryos with unfrozen, undelipated embryos (23 of 93). These results confirm that removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets from bovine IVM/IVF zygotes allows for successful cryopreservation at the 8- to 16-cell stage and that blastomeres from these embryos can be used as donors of karyoplasts for nucleus transfer.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Procedures have been developed for producing bovine embryos by in vitro maturation/in vitro fertilization (IVM/IVF) using oocytes collected from abattoir ovaries [1, 2]. In fact, IVM/IVF techniques in conjunction with cryopreservation are expected to play an important role in cattle breeding and basic research. Presently, however, experimental and practical use of such embryos is limited because bovine embryos at pre-morula stages—regardless of whether they have in vivo or in vitro origins—are known to be sensitive to cryopreservation in comparison with later-stage embryos [3, 4].

Nagashima et al. [5] recently reported that the extreme sensitivity of pre-morula-stage porcine embryos to low temperature relates to a high lipid content in their cytoplasm, and that removal of lipid droplets allows them to tolerate cryopreservation. Similarly, pre-morula-stage bovine embryos are also known to have large quantities of cytoplasmic lipid droplets and to show high sensitivity to freezing [3], while it is also known that the lipid droplet content declines after the morula stage, coinciding with the embryos' loss in sensitivity to cryopreservation [6]. Since these characteristics resemble those of pigs, we surmised that the sensitivity of pre-morula-stage bovine embryos to freezing could be altered by the removal of cytoplasmic lipids, with this interesting possibility leading to the present study designed to investigate whether tolerance to cryopreservation of pre-morula-stage embryos produced by IVM/IVF can be improved by removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets.

Another purpose of the present study is to determine whether or not cryopreserved delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos can be used as karyoplasts for nuclear transfer. Westhusin et al. [7] and Bondioli et al. [8] carried out nuclear transfer of bovine embryos using cryopreserved, in vivo-derived morulae as nucleus donors, yet the corresponding use of in vitro-derived pre-morula-stage embryos has never been reported. The ability to use cryopreserved IVM/IVF embryos as a source of the donor nucleus holds much promise, because in vitro production of embryos obtained from valuable breeding stock before their slaughter has become a practical technology.

In the study reported here, we studied in vitro development of delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos at the pre-morula stage after cryopreservation, and then used blastomeres of these embryos as the donor nucleus for nuclear transfer. Parameters determining the efficacy of nuclear transfer, i.e., isolation and fusion rates of karyoplasts, and the developmental ability of reconstructed embryos were also investigated to evaluate the feasibility of using cryopreserved, delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos for nuclear transfer.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials

We used the following chemicals: BSA (fraction V), heparin, caffeine, cytochalasin B (CB), hyaluronidase, and cycloheximide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO); TCM-199 with Earle's salts, fetal calf serum (FCS), Giemsa stain, and colcemid (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY); streptomycin and penicillin-G (Meiji Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan).

In Vitro Production of Bovine Embryos

Ovaries of Holstein cattle obtained from a slaughterhouse were placed in vacuum bottles and transported to our laboratory within 3 h in 0.9% saline while being kept at 30–35°C. To collect cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs), follicles from 3 to 5 mm in diameter were aspirated through an 18-gauge needle into a disposable 10-ml syringe. Chosen for the experiment were oocytes with a compact layer of unexpanded cumulus oophorus and evenly granulated cytoplasm [9]. Collected COCs were washed four times with 25 mM Hepes-buffered TCM-199 supplemented with 5% (v:v) FCS, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin-G. In a single drop of the same medium, 50 COCs were cultured at 38.5°C in an atmosphere of 3% CO2 in air for 22 h [10]. Matured oocytes were subsequently inseminated with 5 x 106 sperm during a 5-h incubation period in a 500-µl droplet of BO medium [11] supplemented with 10 mg/ml BSA, 10 µg/ml heparin, and 5 mM caffeine [9]. After insemination, the oocytes were cultured at 38.5°C in a 500-µl droplet of the maturation medium with cumulus cells (in vitro culture [IVC] medium) in an atmosphere of 3% CO2 in air [9]. One-cell-stage embryos grown 24 h after insemination were used for the experiments. In our earlier work, the maturation rate, fertilization rate, and developmental rate of oocytes to blastocysts using this IVM/IVF/IVC system were respectively 90%, 90%, and 20%.

Removal of Cytoplasmic Lipid Droplets from IVM/IVF Embryos and Development of Delipated Embryos

We applied a previously described method used for porcine embryos to polarize cytoplasmic lipid droplets by centrifugation [5], after modification for IVM/IVF bovine embryos. Briefly, one-cell-stage embryos were preincubated in modified PBS (PB1) [12] + 20% FCS containing 7.5 µg/ml CB for 10 min and then were centrifuged (12 000 x g) in the same medium for 15 min.

Micromanipulation to remove polarized cytoplasmic lipid droplets from embryos, referred to as delipated embryos, was performed using the method of Nagashima et al. [5]. That is, the polarized lipid layer was aspirated by a beveled suction pipette (diam. 35 µm) attached to a Narishige micromanipulator (MO-202; Tokyo, Japan) while being viewed under a Nikon inverted microscope at x200 magnification (TMD model; Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan; Fig. 1). Also prepared were intact control embryos and sham-operated, undelipated embryos (sham-operated embryos) treated with CB and centrifuged (12 000 x g) to polarize cytoplasmic lipid droplets. The development to the blastocyst stage of all embryos was examined [9, 10] after culturing in IVC medium for 7 days as described above.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets from an IVM/IVF bovine embryo by micromanipulation. a) Zygote with polarized layer of lipid droplets after centrifugation with 7.5 µg/ml CB at 12 000 x g for 15 min. b–d) Micromanipulation aspiration of the polarized lipid droplets using suction and holding pipettes. Bar = 100 µm.

Blastocysts were fixed by Tarkowski's air-dry method [13] with slight modification and stained with 5% Giemsa stain to allow counting of cells. Briefly, embryos were treated with 0.9% sodium citrate solution for 20 min at room temperature (r.t.); fixed onto a spot plate (Corning Labware and Equipment, Corning, NY) with ice-cooled fixative consisting of methanol, acetic acid, and distilled water (3:2:1) for 1 min; mounted on a glass slide using a small amount of the fixative; air-dried for 1 h at r.t.; and, finally, stained with Giemsa stain for 10 min. Total nuclei numbers of the blastocysts were counted under a microscope at x400 magnification.

Cryopreservation of Embryos

Embryos were equilibrated at r.t. with 1.5 M 1,2-propanediol (PROH) for 15 min and loaded into a 0.25-ml plastic straw with 1.5 M PROH + 0.1 M sucrose [14, 15]. Straws were cooled directly from r.t. to -6.5°C, seeded, cooled at a rate of 0.3°C/min to -30°C using a programmable freezer (ET-1; FHK, Tokyo, Japan), and finally plunged into liquid nitrogen. Straws were thawed in air for 10 sec and then in 35°C water for 10 sec, after which the embryos were expelled from the straw. Cryoprotectant was diluted at r.t. by step-wise exposure to 1 M PROH + 0.2 M sucrose for 10 min, 0.5 M PROH + 0.2 M sucrose for 5 min, 0.2 M sucrose for 5 min, and PB1 + 20% FCS for 10 min. We used PB1 + 20% FCS to dilute media for equilibration, freezing, and thawing.

Post-thaw survival of embryos was assessed by their in vitro development after culture for 6 days in IVC medium. Cell numbers of the developing blastocysts were counted as described above.

Nucleus Transfer of Frozen-Thawed Delipated Embryos

Recipient cytoplasts for nucleus transfer were obtained by IVM of oocytes using the same methods described above. After 20 h of maturation culture, cumulus cells of oocytes were removed by repeated pipetting through a fine-bore pipette in BSA-free PB1 containing 1 mg/ml hyaluronidase. Oocytes with the first polar body (metaphase II oocytes) were selected as recipient oocytes.

Enucleation of oocytes was carried out as previously described [16]. Briefly, they were enucleated by aspirating the first polar body and adjacent ooplasm (about 1/3 of an ooplasm) using a micropipette (diam. 35 µm) in PB1 + 20% FCS containing 5 µg/ml CB and 0.1 µg/ml colcemid. To confirm removal of the M II chromosomes, fragments of removed ooplasm were stained with 5 µg/ml acridine orange for 5 min and observed using a fluorescent microscope (Nikon TMD). After 22 h of maturation culture, enucleated oocytes were activated by exposure to 7% ethanol in maturation medium for 7 min [16] and further cultured in maturation medium containing 5 µg/ml cycloheximide for 6 h [17].

Donor blastomeres at the 8- to 16-cell stage were isolated from cryopreserved delipated embryos cultured for 24 h after thawing. Blastomeres at the same stage were similarly isolated from unfrozen undelipated control embryos. For isolation, zona pellucidae of the donor embryos were removed mechanically using a microneedle and holding pipette [16], with blastomeres then being disaggregated by repeated gentle pipetting through a fine-bore pipette (130 µm diameter) in PB1 + 20% FCS. Each blastomere was inserted into the perivitelline space of an enucleated recipient oocyte through a slit on the zona opened as a result of micromanipulation for enucleation.

Oocyte-blastomere complexes were placed between two platinum wire electrodes mounted 1 mm apart on a glass microscope slide (BTX Inc., San Diego, CA) and overlaid with fusion medium consisting of 0.3 M sucrose, 0.1 mM MgSO4, and 0.05 mM CaCl2. After an alternating current field (1 MHz, 11 V/mm) was applied for 20 sec, membrane fusion between a blastomere and recipient oocyte was induced by applying two direct-current pulses (75 V/mm for 50 µsec). Subsequently, oocyte-blastomere complexes were kept in PB1 + 20% FCS at 38.5°C for 1 h, after which they were examined under a stereoscopic microscope (SMZ model; Nikon) at x80 magnification to check for the occurrence of fusion, with those showing no sign of fusion [16] being discarded (11 of 285, 3.9%). In our previous study, we confirmed swelling of the donor nucleus after fusion [16]. The development of nucleus transfer embryos was examined over an 8-day culture period in IVC medium.

Statistics

Developmental and survival rates of the embryos, as well as the fusion rate of blastomeres, were analyzed by the chi-square test with Yates' correction for independence and by Fisher's exact probability test to determine the statistical difference between groups. Student's t-test was used to compare mean cell number of blastocysts and numbers of isolated donor blastomeres. A probability of less than 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Vitro Development of Delipated Embryos

Table 1 presents results summarizing in vitro development of the intact control, sham-operated, and delipated embryo groups. Regarding developmental timing, after insemination, intact control embryos developed to the 2- and 8- to 16-cell stages after 30 and 48 h, respectively. The development of these embryos tended to arrest at the 8- to 16-cell stage for 24–48 h, subsequently progressing to the morula and blastocyst stages after culturing in IVC medium for 7 days. Delipated and sham-operated embryos developed almost synchronously with the intact control embryos (Fig. 2). It should be noted that the developmental rate of delipated embryos to the blastocyst stage was not significantly different from that of intact control or sham-operated embryo groups, and the blastocysts derived from delipated embryos had cell counts comparable to those derived from intact control embryos, i.e., 90 ± 3.4 vs. 105 ± 5.7.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. In vitro development of delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Delipated (a), sham-operated (b), and intact control (c) IVM/IVF bovine embryos before cryopreservation at 8- to 16-cell stage. Sham-operated embryos consist of partially delipated blastomeres and blastomeres with high lipid content. Photographs were taken 24 h after treatment. Bar = 100 µm.

Survival of Delipated IVM/IVF Embryosafter Cryopreservation

Table 2 presents the in vitro survival results of intact control, sham-operated, and delipated embryo groups after cryopreservation, showing that significantly more delipated embryos were recovered with no visible sign of cell damage in comparison with embryos in the sham-operated or intact control embryo groups (40% vs. 14% and 14%; p < 0.01). In addition, a higher percentage of delipated embryos developed to blastocysts than those of the other two groups (23% vs. 5% and 9%; p < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Survival of delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos after cryopreservation.

Nucleus Transfer of Frozen-Thawed Delipated Embryos

As shown in Table 3, although the efficiency of isolating blastomeres from frozen-thawed delipated embryos and the fusion rate of these blastomeres to recipient oocytes were significantly lower (p < 0.01) than those for the unfrozen, undelipated, control embryos, the developmental rate of the nucleus transfer embryos reconstituted with frozen, delipated blastomeres (16%) was comparable to that of the nucleus transfer embryos with nuclei from control embryos (25%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. In vitro development of nucleus transfer (NT) embryos reconstituted with frozen-thawed blastomeres isolated from delipated IVM/IVF embryos.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Results show that 8- to 16-cell IVM/IVF bovine embryos, which have been shown to be highly sensitive to low temperature [4], can be successfully cryopreserved after removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets before cleavage. Diez et al. [18] have also shown that the freezability of blastocysts that had developed from delipated IVM/IVF bovine zygotes was higher than that of undelipated embryos.

Tolerance to freezing of bovine embryos produced by IVM/IVF/IVC is known to be lower than that of embryos collected in vivo [4, 19, 20]. Leibo and Loskutoff [19] found that IVM/IVF bovine embryos had darker cytoplasm and lower specific gravity than in vivo-derived embryos, suggesting that the cytoplasm of IVM/IVF embryos contained a higher content of lipid droplets, or the composition of component lipids of IVM/IVF embryos differed from that of their in vivo-derived counterparts. We surmised that changes in the quantity and quality of component lipids account for the low tolerance to cryopreservation of IVM/IVF bovine embryos.

Damage to membrane lipids can be caused by free oxygen radical formation due to suboptimal conditions in a long-term culture. This is known to change membrane fluidity and permeability such that the resistance of embryos to osmotic stress decreases [21]. Since embryos are exposed to osmotic stress during the course of freezing and thawing [22], this decrease in resistance could presumably have a major effect on the tolerance of embryos to freezing.

Since the damage to lipids due to in vitro culture may occur in cytoplasmic lipid droplets as well as membrane lipids, the removal of these droplets from IVM/IVF embryos could in turn remove the target of free oxygen radicals in the cytoplasm. Accordingly, such removal of targets could very well decrease the ensuing chain reaction of peroxidative damage to embryos, a phenomenon that ultimately improves the embryo's tolerance to freezing. In contrast, survival rate and the increase of cell numbers in the sham-operated embryos after freeze-thawing was lower, indicating that many of the blastomeres were damaged. A part of the polarized lipid droplets left unremoved in the perivitelline space of the sham-operated embryos was observed to redistribute into the blastomeres, particularly those located in the hemisphere contiguous to the polarized lipids. This implies that the embryos were incompletely delipated and may not have been rendered fully cryotolerant.

Several researchers have reported that the developmental ability of IVM/IVF bovine embryos is affected by culture conditions, i.e., low oxygen tension [23] and the addition of thiol compounds [24] or antioxidants [2527]. These modifications, which may prevent an autocatalytic peroxidative chain reaction among cellular lipids [21], have also been shown to contribute to increasing the cryotolerance of in vitro-produced bovine embryos [28, 29]. Therefore, the use of delipated embryos for cryopreservation may provide valuable insights into the relation between lipid peroxidation and cryoinjury of embryonic cells. Such knowledge is expected to provide clues for developing a noninvasive method to produce IVM/IVF bovine embryos with improved freezability.

Results also indicate that delipated IVM/IVF bovine embryos develop into blastocysts in vitro at a developmental rate and culture period that is not significantly different from those of the controls. Total cell number of Day 7 blastocysts from delipated embryos was similar to cell numbers of blastocysts produced IVM/IVF/IVC in previous reports [30, 31]. Diez et al. [18] have obtained pregnancies by transferring blastocysts developed from delipated bovine embryos, while Nagashima et al. [32] showed that delipated porcine embryos developed into blastocysts in vitro and into normal offspring after transfer into recipients. While it is known that cytoplasmic lipid droplets in embryos are a source of energy and contain metabolic products and structural elements (for review see [33]), results of these two experiments indicate that cytoplasmic lipid droplets are not essential for the development of either bovine or porcine embryos in the early cleavage stage, which raises new questions about the significance of the presence of cytoplasmic lipid droplets in many mammalian embryos.

It has recently been demonstrated that nuclear transfer using cultured somatic cells can lead to normal offspring in sheep [34] and cattle [35], achievements implying that a potentially unlimited source of donor nuclei can be cryopreserved for cloning animals [36]. The efficiency of nuclear transfer with somatic cell nuclei, however, is still very limited [34, 37], and therefore the use of cryopreserved embryos as a source of donor nuclei is practically important.

Our results indicate that blastomeres of delipated, cryopreserved IVM/IVF bovine embryos can be successfully used as karyoplasts for nucleus transfer. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of cryopreserved 8- to 16-cell-stage bovine IVM/IVF embryos as nucleus donors for nuclear transfer. In contrast, when nucleus transfer was performed using intact control or sham-operated embryos after freeze-thawing, many blastomeres ruptured during micromanipulation or electric fusion, and therefore they were judged to be unsuitable nucleus donors for nucleus transfer (data not shown).

In the present study, the efficiency of isolating blastomeres from cryopreserved delipated embryos and the fusion rate of isolated blastomeres were found to be inferior to those of the unfrozen, undelipated blastomeres used as controls. Ushijima and Eto [38] have shown that the rate of rupture of undelipated blastomeres derived from in vitro-produced embryos by isolation and electric fusion is higher than that for those derived in vivo. Nagashima et al. [39] demonstrated that isolation of blastomeres from cryopreserved, delipated, 8- to 16-cell-stage porcine embryos derived in vivo and electric fusion of such isolated blastomeres can be performed with an efficiency equivalent to that of using unfrozen, undelipated embryos as controls. Taken together, these observations suggest that the susceptibility to rupture of blastomeres is greatly influenced by the use of IVM/IVF to derive the embryos.

In summary, our results demonstrate that the removal of cytoplasmic lipid droplets from bovine pre-morula-stage IVM/IVF embryos, which are in general highly sensitive to low temperatures, improved their tolerance to cryopreservation. They also show that the blastomeres isolated from cryopreserved, delipated IVM/IVF embryos can be used as nucleus donors for nucleus transfer.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We sincerely thank Dr. David T. Armstrong, Western Ontario University, for his critical reading and valuable suggestions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Correspondence. FAX: 81 470 46 3012; mineoka{at}awa.or.jp Back

2 Current address: Biomedical Research Center, Osaka University Medical School, 2–2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan. Back

Accepted: October 1, 1998.

Received: March 18, 1997.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Brackett BG, Zuelke KA. Analysis of factors involved in the in vitro production of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1993; 39:43–64.[CrossRef]
  2. Trounson A, Pushett D, Maclellan LJ, Lewis I, Gardner DK. Current status of IVM/IVF and embryo culture in human and farm animals. Theriogenology 1994; 41:57–66.
  3. Mohr LR, Trounson AO. Structural changes associated with freezing of bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 1981; 25:1009–1025.[Abstract]
  4. Pollard JW, Leibo SP. Chilling sensitivity of mammalian embryos. Theriogenology 1994; 41:101–106.
  5. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Seamark RF, Nottle MB. Removal of cytoplasmic lipid enhances the tolerance of porcine embryos to chilling. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:618–622.[Abstract]
  6. Trounson AO, Willadsen SM, Rowson LEA, Newcomb R. The storage of cow eggs at room temperature and low temperature. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 46:173–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Westhusin ME, Pryor JH, Bondioli KR. Nuclear transfer in the bovine embryo: a comparison of 5-day, 6-day, frozen-thawed, and nuclear transfer donor embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 28:119–123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Bondioli KR, Westhusin ME, Looney CR. Production of identical bovine offspring by nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 1990; 33:165–174.[CrossRef]
  9. Hamano S, Kuwayama M. In vitro fertilization and development of bovine oocytes recovered from the ovaries of individual donors: a comparison between the cutting and aspiration method. Theriogenology 1993; 39:703–712.
  10. Kajihara Y, Goto K, Kosaka S, Nakanishi Y, Ogawa K. In vitro fertilization of bovine follicular oocyte and their development up to hatched blastocyst in vitro. Jpn J Anim Reprod 1987; 33:173–180 (in Japanese).
  11. Brackett BG, Oliphant G. Capacitation of rabbit spermatozoa in vitro. Biol Reprod 1975; 12:260–274.[Abstract]
  12. Whittingham DG. Culture of mouse ova. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1971; 14:7–21.[Medline]
  13. Tarkowski AK. An air-dry-method for chromosome preparation from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966; 5:394–400.[CrossRef]
  14. Lucas-Hahn A, Niemann H. In vitro survival of fresh and frozen/thawed bovine demi-embryos. Theriogenology 1991; 36:619–627.
  15. Trounson AO, Shaw JM. Embryo cryopreservation. Reprod Med Rev 1992; 1:179–188.
  16. Ushijima H, Eto T. Bovine nuclear transplantation using parthenogenetically activated oocyte as the recipient cytoplast. J Reprod Dev 1994; 40:125–132.
  17. First NL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, Northey DL, Nottleman PR. Use of in vitro oocytes 24 hr of age in bovine nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 1992; 37:211.[CrossRef]
  18. Diez C, LeBourhis D, Heyman Y, Renard JP. Effect of partial lipid removal from in vitro produced bovine zygotes on further development in vitro and on the freezing tolerance of blastocysts. Theriogenology 1996; 41:167.
  19. Leibo SP, Loskutoff NM. Cryobiology of in vitro-derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1993; 39:81–94.[CrossRef]
  20. Hasler JF, Henderson WB, Hurtgen PJ, Jin ZQ, McCauley AD, Mower SA, Neely B, Shuey LS, Stokes JE, Trimmer SA. Production, freezing and transfer of bovine IVF embryos and subsequent calving results. Theriogenology 1995; 43:141–152.[CrossRef]
  21. Johnson MH, Nasr-Esfahani MH. Radical solutions and cultural problems. Bioessays 1994; 16:31–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Mazur P. Slow-freezing injury in mammalian cells. In: Elliott K, Whelan J (eds.), The Freezing of Mammalian Embryos. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Excerpta Medica; 1977: 19–48.
  23. Nagao Y, Saeki K, Hoshi M, Kainuma H. Effects of oxygen concentration and oviductal epithelial tissue on the development of in vitro matured and fertilized bovine oocytes cultured in protein-free medium. Theriogenology 1994; 41:681–689.
  24. Takahashi M, Nagai T, Hamano S, Kuwayama M, Okamura N, Okano A. Effect of thiol compounds on in vitro development and intracellular glutathione content of bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:228–232.[Abstract]
  25. Hamano S, Kuwayama M, Takahashi M, Okamura N, Okano A, Nagai T. Effect of ß-mercaptoethanol on the preimplantation development of bovine embryos fertilized in vitro. J Reprod Dev 1994; 40:355–359.
  26. Harvey MB, Arcellana-Panlilio MY, Zhang X, Schultz GA, Watson AJ. Expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes in preimplantation mouse and cow embryos and primary bovine oviduct cultures employed for embryo coculture. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:532–540.[Abstract]
  27. Caamano JN, Ryoo ZY, Thomas JA, Youngs CR. ß-Mercaptoethanol enhances blastocyst formation rate of bovine in vitro-matured/in vitro-fertilized embryos. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:1179–1184.[Abstract]
  28. Li RF, Hosoe M, Shimizu M, Bou S, Shioya Y. Freezing viabilities of bovine blastocysts derived from different culture conditions. The 8th AAAP Anim Sci Congr Proc 1996; 2:82–83.
  29. Pangestu M, Lewis I, Shaw J. Alpha tocopherol micro injection protects in vitro-produced bovine pronuclear-stage embryos from chill- and cryo-injury. In: Program of the 13th International Congress on Animal Reproduction; 1996; Sydney, Australia. Abstract P15–7.
  30. Iwasaki S, Yoshiba N, Ushijima H, Watanabe S, Nakahara T. Morphology and proportion of inner cell mass of bovine blastocysts fertilized in vitro and in vivo. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 90:279–284.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Mochizuki H, Fukui Y, Ono H. Effect of the number of granulosa cells added to culture medium for in vitro maturation, fertilization and development of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 1991; 36:973–987.[CrossRef]
  32. Nagashima H, Kashiwazaki N, Ashman RJ, Grupen CG, Nottle MB. Cryopreservation of porcine embryos. Nature 1995; 374:416.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Leese HJ. Metabolism of the preimplantation mammalian embryos. In: Milligan SR (ed.), Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1991: 35–72.
  34. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and mammalian cells. Nature 1997; 385:810–813.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Cibelli JB, Stice SL, Golueke PJ, Kane JJ, Jerry J, Blackwell C, Ponce FA, Robl JM. Cloned transgenic calves produced from nonquiescent fetal fibroblasts. Science 1998; 280:1256–1258.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Hay RJ. Cell line preservation and characterization. In: Freshney RI (ed.), Animal Cell Culture, A Practical Approach, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1992: 95–146.
  37. Schnieke AE, Kind AJ, Ritchie WA, Mycock K, Scott AR, Ritchie M, Wilmut I, Colman A, Campbell KHS. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 1997; 278:2130–2133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ushijima H, Eto T. Production of a calf from a nuclear transfer embryo using in vitro matured oocytes. J Reprod Dev 1992; 38:61–65.
  39. Nagashima H, Ashman RJ, Nottle MB. Nucleus transfer of porcine embryos using cryopreserved delipated blastomeres as donor nuclei. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 48:339–343.[CrossRef][Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ushijima, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nagashima, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS