Biol Reprod 2009 SSR Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 546-550 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.

Proliferation and Differentiation of Rat Theca-Interstitial Cells: Comparison of Effects Induced by Platelet-Derived Growth Factor and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I1

Antoni J. Duleba2,a, Robert Z. Spaczynskic, Aydin Aricia, Rocco Carboneb, and Harold R. Behrmana

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and b Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8063 c Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Karol Marcinkowski University School of Medical Science, Poznan, Poland


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study was designed to evaluate mechanisms regulating proliferation of steroidogenically active and steroidogenically inactive theca-interstitial (T-I) cells, and, specifically, to evaluate the effects of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I). T-I cells obtained from immature Sprague-Dawley rats were cultured in chemically defined media. Proliferation was assayed by thymidine incorporation and cell counting. Steroidogenically active cells were identified by the presence of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity. Flow cytometry facilitated separation of dividing cells (in S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle) from nondividing cells (in G0 and G1 phases of the cell cycle). PDGF alone (0.1–1 nM) produced a dose-dependent increase in DNA synthesis by up to 136%. IGF-I alone (10 nM) increased DNA synthesis by 56%. In the presence of both IGF-I (10 nM) and PDGF (0.1–1 nM), DNA synthesis increased by 108–214%. PDGF (1 nM) increased the total number of T-I cells by 43%; this effect was due to an increase in the number of steroidogenically inactive cells (47%). In contrast, the stimulatory effect of IGF-I (10 nM) was predominantly due to an increase in the number of steroidogenically active cells (163%). Separation of dividing cells from nondividing cells was accomplished with the aid of flow cytometry. In the absence of growth factors, the proportion of steroidogenically active cells was 35% lower among proliferating than resting cells. PDGF (1 nM) decreased the proportion of steroidogenically active cells among both proliferating and resting cells (by 43% and 16%, respectively). In contrast, IGF-I (10 nM) increased the proportion of steroidogenically active cells among proliferating cells by 56%. These findings indicate that differentiated/steroidogenically active cells divide; furthermore, PDGF and IGF-I may selectively stimulate proliferation of individual subpopulations of T-I cells, thereby providing a mechanism for development of structural and steroidogenically active components of the T-I compartment.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Theca-interstitial (T-I) cells provide ovarian follicles with a supporting structural framework; furthermore, steroid and nonsteroid products of T-I cells play an important role in regulating the proliferation and function of granulosa cells [13]. Under physiological conditions, developmental growth of the ovary precedes its reproductive function. In the mature individual, overall ovarian size appears relatively stable; however, this homeostasis is dynamic, whereby the T-I compartment is continually remodeled. The cells surrounding developing follicles proliferate and acquire steroidogenic activity, while the cells within the wall of the atretic follicles undergo gradual resorption, most likely via apoptosis [4, 5].

Several lines of evidence point to insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) as potentially important regulators of proliferation and differentiation of T-I cells. First, IGF-I and PDGF play a role in the control of developmental growth, homeostatic maintenance, and differentiation of a broad range of other tissues [6, 7]. Second, T-I cells possess receptors for IGF-I and PDGF, and hence, actions of these growth factors are biologically feasible [811]. Third, IGF-I modulates many aspects of T-I cell functions. In particular, IGF-I stimulates cellular differentiation: it promotes androgen production by increasing the expression of messenger ribonucleic acid for cholesterol side-chain cleavage, 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase [1214]. Furthermore, our recent studies have demonstrated that IGF-I stimulates proliferation of T-I cells in rats and humans [15, 16].

Proliferative actions of IGF-I may be modulated by PDGF. The traditional model of mechanisms regulating mitotic activity of mesenchymal cells describes dual control of proliferation by "competence" and "progression" factors [17, 18]. According to this model, IGF-I acts as a progression factor inducing competent cells to synthesize DNA. PDGF, on the other hand, has been described as a competence factor capable of stimulating the cells to progress from G0 to G1 phase of the cell cycle, but not beyond. PDGF may also affect other aspects of cellular function, including modulation of differentiation [6].

Proliferation and differentiation are thought to occur sequentially, with division of undifferentiated cells followed by differentiation and loss of proliferative activity [19]. In accord with this paradigm, proliferation and terminal differentiation are mutually exclusive; furthermore, organogenesis and folliculogenesis may be viewed as processes whereby a progressive decrease of proliferative activity occurs in parallel with the development of terminal differentiation. For T-I cells, steroidogenic activity is considered a measure of differentiation [13, 14]. Little, however, is known about the role of differentiation in the modulation of proliferative activity and about mechanisms regulating the development of steroidogenically active and inactive subpopulations of T-I cells.

The present study was designed to determine whether steroidogenic activity affects proliferation of T-I cells and to evaluate the effects of PDGF in comparison to IGF-I on the proliferation of steroidogenically active and steroidogenically inactive cells. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that differentiated (steroidogenically active) T-I cells proliferate and that individual growth factors selectively affect proliferation of different subpopulations of these cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials

The following materials were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO): Medium-199 with Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), medium 199 with HBSS (10x), McCoy's 5a medium (modified, without serum), L-glutamine, BSA, trypsin-EDTA (0.05%/0.02%), nitro-blue tetrazolium, 5ß-androstan-3ß-ol-17-one, ß-NAD+, sesame oil, Percoll, recombinant IGF-I, Hoechst 33342, and DiOC5. Collagenase type I (Clostridium histolyticum, CLS1; 146 U/mg) and DNase I (bovine pancreas; 2298 U/mg) were obtained from Worthington Biochemical Co. (Freehold, NY). The following materials were purchased from Grand Island Biological Co. (Grand Island, NY): Trypan blue dye (0.4%, w:v), antibiotic-antimycotic preparation (penicillin, 10 000 IU/ml; streptomycin, 10 000 µg/ml; amphotericin B, 25 µg/ml), and Dulbecco's PBS (1x, pH 7.2, without MgCl2 and CaCl2). HEPES was purchased from American Bioanalytical (Natick, MA). Radiolabeled [3H]thymidine was purchased from Amersham Life Sciences Inc. (Arlington Heights, IL). Recombinant PDGF-AB heterodimer and anti-human PDGF neutralizing antibody (Ab-PDGF) were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN).

Animals

Immature (25 days old) female Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY) and housed with a 12L:12D photoperiod in an air-conditioned environment. Standard rat chow and water were given ad libitum. Starting on the 28th day of age, the animals received injections of estradiol-17ß (1 mg/0.3 ml sesame oil s.c.) daily for three days in order to stimulate ovarian development. On the morning after the last injection (Day 31 of age) the animals were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine (i.p.) and killed by perfusion with 0.9% saline. All treatments and procedures were in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and a protocol approved by the Yale University Animal Care Committee, and the investigations were conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals promulgated by the Society for the Study of Reproduction.

Isolation of Theca-Interstitial Cells and Cell Cultures

Ovaries were dissected, and T-I cells were isolated and purified as described previously [15]. The cells were counted using a hemocytometer, and viability was determined using a trypan blue dye exclusion test. Cell viability was in the 85–95% range. The cells were cultured in McCoy's 5a medium supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), BSA (1 mg/ml), penicillin (10 000 IU/ml), streptomycin (10 000 µg/ml), and amphotericin B (25 µg/ml). Cultures were carried out at 37ÅC in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in humidified air in 6-well plates, 24-well plates (Falcon, Becton Dickinson Labware, Lincoln Park, NJ), or 96-well plates (Corning Glass Works, Corning, NY) for 48 h. The final amount of T-I cells plated was 700 x 103 cells/2 ml in 6-well plates, 350 x 103 cells/ml in 24-well plates, and 35 x 103 cells/0.25 ml in 96-well plates. The immunohistochemical characterization of the isolated T-I cells has been described previously [15]. Briefly, before plating, 95.4% of cells stained positive for a mesenchymal marker, vimentin; 7.6% of cells stained positive for an epithelial marker, cytokeratin; and 2.2% of cells stained positive for an endothelial marker, factor VIII. Comparable findings were observed at the end of the culture period. Furthermore, morphologic characteristics of the cultured cells were consistent with stromal cells and distinctly different from granulosa cells.

DNA Synthesis Determination

Radiolabeled [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to cultured T-I cells during the last 24 h of culture. At the end of the culture period, the cells were harvested using a multiwell cell harvester (PHD Harvester, Model 290; Cambridge Technology, Inc., Watertown, MA). Radioactivity was measured in a liquid scintillation counter, SL 4000 (Intertechnique, Fairfield, NJ). Each treatment was carried out in at least 6 replicates.

Cell Counting, Identification of Steroidogenically Active Cells

T-I cells were cultured in 24-well plates; each treatment was carried out at least in triplicate. At the end of the culture period, the cells were washed with PBS. Trypsin-EDTA (0.05% and 0.02%, respectively; 0.3 ml/2 cm2) solution was dispensed into culture wells to completely cover the monolayer of cells, and the culture dish was placed at 37ÅC for 2–3 min. When the cells were in suspension and appeared rounded, McCoy's 5a medium was added to inhibit trypsin activity. Subsequently, the T-I cells were washed with PBS and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for 20 min. Steroidogenically active T-I cells were identified histochemically (Fig. 1) by detection of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3ß-HSD) activity as described previously [20, 21]. The number of stained cells (steroidogenically active) and nonstained cells (steroidogenically inactive) was determined using a hemocytometer by counting 10 squares from each sample. Before cell counting, the samples were randomized, and the observer counting the cells was blinded to the treatment.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Identification of steroidogenically active (stained) and steroidogenically inactive (nonstained) rat T-I cells by histochemical detection of 3ß-HSD activity at the end of a 48-h culture.

Separation of Cells According to the Phase of the Cell Cycle

T-I cells were cultured in 6-well plastic plates with or without PDGF and IGF-I for 24 h (n = 5 for each treatment). Separation of the cells according to the phase of the cell cycle was performed using a supravital staining with a DNA binding dye (Hoechst 33342) in combination with the membrane potential modifying fluorochrome DiOC5 [22]. During the last hour of culture, T-I cells were incubated with Hoechst 33342 (5 µg/ml) and DiOC5 (0.3 µg/ml). Subsequently, the cells were trypsinized (as described above) and reconstituted in McCoy's 5a medium in the presence of Hoechst 33342 (5 µg/ml) and DiOC5 (0.3 µg/ml). Cell sorting was carried out using a FACS Vantage flow cytometer (Becton-Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA). The stained cells were excited at 351–363 nm, and their fluorescence was observed between 440 and 480 nm. The cells were sorted according to their DNA content into two populations: proliferating (in S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle) or resting (in G0 and G1 phases of the cell cycle). Proliferating and resting populations of cells were then evaluated histochemically for the presence of 3ß-HSD activity (described above).

Statistical Analysis

Results are presented as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons between means were performed using ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparisons of individual means. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DNA Synthesis

DNA synthesis was evaluated by quantifying [3H]thymidine incorporation. PDGF alone (0.1–1 nM) produced a dose-dependent increase in DNA synthesis by 30–136% above control levels (Fig. 2). IGF-I alone (10 nM) increased DNA synthesis by 56% above the control. When the cells were exposed simultaneously to IGF-I (10 nM) and PDGF (0.1–1 nM), the radiolabeled thymidine incorporation increased by 108–214% above control levels, indicating that PDGF and IGF-I produced a near additive effect on DNA synthesis.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effects of PDGF (0.1–1 nM) on DNA synthesis by rat T-I cells in the presence and in the absence of IGF-I (10 nM). The cells were cultured in serum-free medium for 48 h in 96-well plates at a concentration of 35 000 cells/well. Each well contained 0.25 ml of medium. During the last 24 h of culture, [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to determine DNA synthesis. Bars indicate the mean of each treatment, and vertical lines indicate the SEM from at least six replicates; means with no superscripts in common are significantly different (p < 0.05).

The effect of the neutralizing antibody against PDGF (Ab-PDGF; 10 ng/ml) on DNA synthesis is presented in Figure 3. Basal thymidine incorporation was inhibited by 17%; furthermore, Ab-PDGF entirely neutralized the effects of the highest dose of PDGF (1 nM) on the DNA synthesis. In contrast, Ab-PDGF had no effect on the DNA synthesis in the presence of IGF-I.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of Ab-PDGF (10 µg/ml) on DNA synthesis by rat T-I cells. The cells were cultured in serum-free medium with or without PDGF (1 nM), IGF-I (10 nM), and/or Ab-PDGF (10 µg/ml) for 48 h. The cultures were carried out in 96-well plates at a concentration of 35 000 cells/well. Each well contained 0.25 ml of medium. During the last 24 h of culture, [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) was added to determine DNA synthesis. Bars indicate the mean of each treatment, and vertical lines indicate the SEM from at least six replicates; * denotes values significantly different from control (p < 0.05).

Determination of the Number of Steroidogenically Active and Inactive T-I Cells

Figure 4 presents the result of cell counting at the end of a 48-h culture. PDGF (1 nM) increased the total number of cells by 43% above the control; this effect was due to an increase in the population of steroidogenically inactive cells (by 47%) without significant change in the number of steroidogenically active cells. A distinctly different pattern was observed among T-I cells cultured in the presence of IGF-I (10 nM). IGF-I increased the total cell count by 64%; this effect was predominantly due to an increase in the number of steroidogenically active cells (by 163%); in addition, the number of steroidogenically inactive cells was also increased by 40%.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Effect of PDGF (1 nM) and IGF-I (10 nM) on the number of steroidogenically active [3ß-HSD(+)] and steroidogenically inactive [3ß-HSD(-)] rat T-I cells. T-I cells were cultured in serum-free medium with or without treatments for 48 h in 24-well plates at a concentration of 350 000 cells per well. Each well contained 1 ml of medium. At the end of the culture period the cells were trypsinized, and steroidogenically active cells were stained by a histochemical reaction identifying 3ß-HSD activity. Bars indicate the mean for each treatment, and vertical lines indicate the SEM from four cultures; * denotes values significantly different from control; p < 0.05.

Identification of Steroidogenic Activity among Proliferating and Resting Cells

Table 1 summarizes the effects of PDGF and IGF-I on the proportion of steroidogenically active cells among proliferating cells (in S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle) and among resting cells (in G0 and G1 phases of the cell cycle). In the absence of growth factors, the percentage of steroidogenically active cells was 35% lower among proliferating than resting cells. In the presence of PDGF (1 nM), the proportion of steroidogenically active cells was decreased among both proliferating and resting cells (by 43% and 16%, respectively). In contrast, in the presence of IGF-I (10 nM), the proportion of steroidogenically active cells increased among proliferating cells by 56%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Effect of PDGF and IGF-I on the proportion of steroidogenically active rat T-I cells among dividing and resting cells following 48-h culture.a


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present findings indicate that 1) proliferation of T-I cells occurs within populations of both steroidogenically active and inactive cells; 2) PDGF and IGF-I stimulate cell proliferation in an additive fashion; 3) PDGF preferentially induces proliferation of steroidogenically inactive cells; and 4) IGF-I preferentially induces proliferation of steroidogenically active cells.

The observation that steroidogenically active cells divide indicates that the presence of 3ß-HSD activity does not represent terminal differentiation in the traditional sense. Thus, while the development of steroidogenic activity may be viewed as a part of a continuum of the process of differentiation, it does not preclude mitotic activity. The findings of this study indicate, however, that differentiation of T-I cells, defined as the presence of steroidogenic activity, is associated with decreased proliferative activity. Under basal conditions in the absence of exogenous growth factors, proliferation among cells possessing 3ß-HSD activity was lower than proliferation among presumably less differentiated steroidogenically inactive cells. Exposure of the cells to IGF-I resulted in an overall increase in the number of steroidogenically active cells and a rise in the proportion of steroidogenically active cells in S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These findings suggest that the low basal proliferation of cells possessing 3ß-HSD activity may be selectively modified; in other words, the decrease of proliferative activity ascribed to differentiation may be reversed by an appropriate stimulus. Alternatively, in order to explain some of the above findings, one may postulate that IGF-I induced first proliferation and subsequently differentiation; this interpretation, however, does not explain the results obtained from flow cytometry experiments demonstrating that IGF-I increased the proportion of 3ß-HSD positive cells among actively dividing cells.

In contrast to IGF-I, PDGF preferentially stimulated proliferation of steroidogenically inactive cells and consequently decreased the proportion of cells with 3ß-HSD activity among proliferating cells. Thus, individual growth factors selectively stimulate separate populations of T-I cells. Such divergent actions of IGF-I and PDGF may provide mechanisms for selective development of ovarian stroma, theca externa, and theca interna. All these tissues contribute to ovarian structural integrity; however, stroma and theca externa possess relatively little steroidogenic activity, while theca interna is highly active and plays a major role in providing granulosa cells with aromatizable androgens. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that growth factors such as PDGF stimulate the growth of stroma and theca externa, while agents such as IGF-I stimulate development of theca interna.

Selective stimulation of proliferation of steroidogenically active and inactive cells by IGF-I and PDGF, respectively, indicates that these growth factors act independently of each other. Results of experiments with neutralizing antibodies against PDGF (Fig. 3) also indicate that IGF actions were independent of PDGF. Further evidence for independent activities of IGF-I and PDGF is provided by observations that proliferation was induced by either of these growth factors alone, and that a combination of IGF-I and PDGF had an additive effect. Thus, a traditional model postulating that proliferation requires both PDGF acting as a competence factor and IGF-I acting as a progression factor [17, 18] may not be strictly applicable to T-I cells. Indeed, it is apparent that effects of IGF-I and PDGF on proliferation are cell-specific. Thus, for example, in some systems, PDGF may stimulate DNA synthesis during both the competence and progression phases, while in other systems PDGF may be neither a competence nor a progression factor [23, 24].

The present observations also offer an interesting perspective on differentiation of the T-I compartment as a whole versus differentiation of individual T-I cells. Differentiation of the T-I compartment may be due not only to an increase in steroidogenesis by individual cells but be also a consequence of an increase in the number of steroidogenically active cells. In the latter case, steroidogenic activity of individual cells may remain unchanged, yet the steroidogenic output by the whole T-I compartment may increase. Notably, previous studies by Magoffin and Weitsman [13] revealed that IGF-I stimulated the expression of 3ß-HSD mRNA in cultures of T-I cells. In light of the present findings, it is likely that IGF-I increases 3ß-HSD expression, at least in part, by increasing the number of cells with steroidogenic activity (i.e., expressing 3ß-HSD).

In this study, T-I cells were obtained from estradiol-treated immature rats. This model provided ovaries with multiple medium-size antral follicles and actively dividing T-I cells. However, in vivo exposure to estradiol may affect a variety of receptors and thus alter endocrine and paracrine responsiveness of the cells. Another important limitation of this study is the possibility of a contamination of T-I cells by other cell types. To examine this possibility, the purity of the T-I cell preparation has been assessed with the aid of immunocytochemistry and morphologic examination of plated cells [15]. Significant contamination of T-I cells with endothelial and epithelial cells is unlikely, because of minimal immunostaining for factor VIII and cytokeratin. Contamination with leukocytes and monocytes was not studied; however, the perfusion of the animals with saline enabled removal of the bulk of blood cells. Finally, significant contamination with granulosa cells, while possible, is unlikely, since the morphologic appearance of the cultured cells is distinctly different from that of granulosa cells; furthermore, the isolation protocol used in this study has been thoroughly evaluated and has been shown to yield a T-I cell preparation nearly free of granulosa cells [25].

Another potential source of contamination of the cultures is BSA, which may contain growth factors and cytokines. However, such contamination would not be likely to alter the findings of this study since all cultures were carried out in the presence of the same concentrations of BSA (1 mg/ml).

In summary, we postulate that PDGF and IGF-I induce selective proliferation of specialized sub-populations of T-I cells. Such actions may represent mechanisms leading to selective development of ovarian stroma, theca externa, and theca interna.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Flow cytometry studies were performed with support from the Yale Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Shared Resource, U.S. Public Health Service Grant CA-16359 from the National Cancer Institute. Back

2 Correspondence: Antoni J. Duleba, M.D., Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520. FAX: 203 785 7134; antoni.duleba{at}qm.yale.edu Back

Accepted: October 5, 1998.

Received: August 20, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hillier SG, Whitelaw PF, Smyth CD. Follicular oestrogen synthesis: the "two-cell, two-gonadotrophin" model revisited. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1994; 100:51–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Parrott JA, Vigne JL, Chu BZ, Skinner MK. Mesenchymal-epithelial interactions in the ovarian follicle involve keratinocyte and hepatocyte growth factor production by thecal cells and their action on granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1994; 135:569–575.[Abstract]
  3. Parrott JA, Skinner MK. Thecal cell-granulosa cell interactions involve a positive feedback loop among keratinocyte growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and kit ligand during ovarian follicular development. Endocrinology 1998; 139:2240–2245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bjersing L. Maturation, morphology, and endocrine function of the follicular wall in mammals. In: RE Jones (ed.), The Vertebrate Ovary. New York: Plenum Press; 1978: 181–214.
  5. Palumbo A, Yeh J. In situ localization of apoptosis in the rat ovary during follicular atresia. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:888–895.[Abstract]
  6. Claesson-Welsh L. Mechanism of action of platelet-derived growth factor. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 1996; 28:373–385.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stewart CE, Rotwein P. Growth, differentiation, and survival: multiple physiological functions for insulin-like growth factors. Physiol Rev 1996; 76:1005–1026.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gates GS, Bayer S, Seibel M, Poretsky L, Flier JS, Moses AC. Characterization of insulin-like growth factor binding to human granulosa cells obtained during in vitro fertilization. J Receptor Res 1987; 7:885–902.[Medline]
  9. Balboni GC, Vannelli GB, Barni T, Orlando C, Serio M. Transferrin and somatomedin C receptors in the human ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril 1987; 48:796–801.[Medline]
  10. Poretsky L, Bhargava G, Levitan E. Type I insulin-like growth factor receptors in human ovarian stroma. Horm Res 1990; 33:22–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Henriksen R, Funa K, Wilander E, Backstrom T, Ridderheim M, Oberg K. Expression and prognostic significance of platelet-derived growth factor and its receptors in epithelial ovarian neoplasms. Cancer Res 1993; 53:4550–4554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Magoffin DA, Kurtz KM, Erickson GF. Insulin-like growth factor-I selectively stimulates cholesterol side-chain cleavage expression in ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Mol Endocrinol 1990; 4:489–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Magoffin DA, Weitsman SR. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates the expression of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase messenger ribonucleic acid in ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:1166–1173.[Abstract]
  14. Magoffin DA, Weitsman SR. Differentiation of ovarian theca-interstitial cells in vitro: regulation of 17 alpha-hydroxylase messenger ribonucleic acid expression by luteinizing hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I. Endocrinology 1993; 132:1945–1951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Duleba AJ, Spaczynski RZ, Olive DL, Behrman HR. Effects of insulin and insulin-like growth factors on proliferation of rat ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:891–897.[Abstract]
  16. Duleba AJ, Spaczynski RZ, Olive DL. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor I stimulate the proliferation of human ovarian theca-interstitial cells. Fertil Steril 1998; 69:335–340.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Pledger WJ, Stiles CD, Antoniades HN, Scher CD. Induction of DNA synthesis in BALB/c 3T3 cells by serum components: reevaluation of the commitment process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:4481–4485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Stiles CD, Capone GT, Scher CD, Antoniades HN, Van Wyk JJ, Pledger WJ. Dual control of cell growth by somatomedins and platelet-derived growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1979; 76:1279–1283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bell E, Marek LF, Levinstone DS, Merrill C, Sher S, Young IT, Eden M. Loss of division potential in vitro: aging or differentiation? Science 1978; 202:1158–1163.
  20. Hild-Petito SA, Shiigi SM, Stouffer RL. Isolation and characterization of cell subpopulations from the monkey corpus luteum of the menstrual cycle. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:1075–1085.[Abstract]
  21. Bao B, Thomas MG, Griffith MK, Burghardt RC, Williams GL. Steroidogenic activity, insulin-like growth factor-I production, and proliferation of granulosa and theca cells obtained from dominant preovulatory and nonovulatory follicles during the bovine estrous cycle: effects of low-density and high-density lipoproteins. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:1271–1279.[Abstract]
  22. Crissman HA, Hofland MH, Stevenson AP, Wilder ME, Tobey RA. Supravital cell staining with Hoechst 33342 and DiOC5(3). Methods Cell Biol 1990; 33:89–95.[Medline]
  23. Kimura M, Kimura I, Okabe M, Beppu T. Dual modes of action of platelet-derived growth factor and its inhibition by trichostatin-A for DNA synthesis in primary cultured smooth muscle cells of rat aorta. Biol Pharm Bull 1994; 17:399–402.[Medline]
  24. Humes HD, Beals TF, Cieslinski DA, Sanchez IO, Page TP. Effects of transforming growth factor-beta, transforming growth factor-alpha, and other growth factors on renal proximal tubule cells. Lab Invest 1991; 64:538–545.[Medline]
  25. Magoffin DA, Erickson GF. An improved method for primary culture of ovarian androgen-producing cells in serum-free medium: effect of lipoproteins, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-I. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1988; 24:862–870.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. S. Sleer and C. C. Taylor
Cell-Type Localization of Platelet-Derived Growth Factors and Receptors in the Postnatal Rat Ovary and Follicle
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 379 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
L. S. Sleer and C. C. Taylor
Platelet-Derived Growth Factors and Receptors in the Rat Corpus Luteum: Localization and Identification of an Effect on Luteogenesis
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2007; 76(3): 391 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. E Nilsson, C. Detzel, and M. K Skinner
Platelet-derived growth factor modulates the primordial to primary follicle transition.
Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Wang, Y. Wen, M. L. Polan, R. Boostanfar, M. Feinman, and B. Behr
Exogenous granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes follicular development in the newborn rat in vivo
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2749 - 2756.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.J. Duleba, N. Foyouzi, M. Karaca, T. Pehlivan, J. Kwintkiewicz, and H.R. Behrman
Proliferation of ovarian theca-interstitial cells is modulated by antioxidants and oxidative stress
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1519 - 1524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Paciga, A. J. Watson, G. E. DiMattia, and G. F. Wagner
Ovarian Stanniocalcin Is Structurally Unique in Mammals and Its Production and Release Are Regulated through the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor
Endocrinology, October 1, 2002; 143(10): 3925 - 3934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. J. Duleba, T. Pehlivan, R. Carbone, and R. Z. Spaczynski
Activin Stimulates Proliferation of Rat Ovarian Thecal-Interstitial Cells
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 704 - 709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. V. Zerbinatti, L. P. Mayer, R. G. Audet, and C. A. Dyer
Apolipoprotein E Is a Putative Autocrine Regulator of the Rat Ovarian Theca Cell Compartment
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2001; 64(4): 1080 - 1089.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
U. A. Vitt, E. A. McGee, M. Hayashi, and A. J. W. Hsueh
In Vivo Treatment with GDF-9 Stimulates Primordial and Primary Follicle Progression and Theca Cell Marker CYP17 in Ovaries of Immature Rats
Endocrinology, October 1, 2000; 141(10): 3814 - 3820.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. C. Taylor
Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Activates Porcine Thecal Cell Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase-Akt/PKB and Ras-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase-1/2 Kinase Signaling Pathways via the Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor
Endocrinology, April 1, 2000; 141(4): 1545 - 1553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Z. Spaczynski, A. Arici, and A. J. Duleba
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} Stimulates Proliferation of Rat Ovarian Theca-Interstitial Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 1999; 61(4): 993 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duleba, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Behrman, H. R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS