|
|
||||||||
a Division of Urology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical College, Fukushima, Japan
c Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii Medical School, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The sperm head can be used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to produce viable offspring, but exactly what elements are required for embryogenesis is still not understood. The sperm head is a complicated structure, containing not only the sperm nucleus with all the paternal DNA but many other cellular elements. These include the plasma membrane, the acrosome and its contents, the acrosomal matrix, and the perinuclear theca, a cytoskeletal structure that completely envelops the nucleus and the nuclear envelope [69]. It is unclear whether mouse sperm nuclei that lack all of these structures can be used for ICSI to produce fertile offspring [10, 11].
In the present study we used an ionic detergent, mixed alkyltrimethylammonium bromide (ATAB), to completely remove all cytoplasmic elements from the sperm head, leaving only the sperm nucleus intact [12, 13]. We also examined the structural organization of the DNA within the sperm nucleus to determine whether there was a correlation between nuclear structure and the production of viable offspring.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The epididymal spermatozoa from one mouse (B6D2 F1) were collected and then suspended in 2 ml of nuclear isolation medium (NIM: 121.6 mM KCl, 7.8 mM Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol, 10 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM PMSF; all supplied by Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) supplemented with an ionic detergent, 0.5% mixed ATAB (Sigma), and 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma); the pH was adjusted to 8.2 by adding drops of 1 M KOH. This suspension was either used fresh or used after 1 or 2 wk of storage at 4°C, during which time most of the DTT was oxidized (see Results). ATAB separates the heads from the tails in both cases. Spermatozoa suspended in this medium for 515 min at room temperature were occasionally vortexed, then centrifuged at 700 x g for 5 min. The sperm pellet was washed in 10 ml of NIM without ATAB or DTT and centrifuged again. The pellet was resuspended in NIM with 6% (w:v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (Mr 360 000; ICN Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA), and a single sperm head was used for ICSI.
Examination of Nuclear Structure
The epididymal spermatozoa from one mouse were collected and suspended in 2 ml of NIM containing ATAB and DTT (NIM-ATAB/DTT), either fresh or 1 wk old, and then washed with 2 ml of NIM as described above. The pelleted nuclei were resuspended in 100 µl of 2 M NaCl, 25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, with or without 2 mM DTT. DTT in this salt buffer was found to be necessary to extract the protamines from sperm nuclei when 1-wk-old buffer was used, but not from freshly prepared NIM-ATAB/DTT. This suggested that DTT was oxidized during the week-long storage, and the experiments were repeated using NIM containing only ATAB (NIM-ATAB) with and without 2 mM DTT. The nuclei were incubated in the salt extraction buffer for 10 min on ice and then stained with 100 µg/ml ethidium bromide to detect the DNA.
Preparation of Oocytes
B6D2F1 females, 810 wk, were induced to superovulate by consecutive injections of 5 IU eCG and 5 IU hCG 48 h apart. Oocytes, collected from oviducts 1415 h after hCG injection, were freed from cumulus cells by treatment with 0.1% bovine testicular hyaluronidase (300 USP U/ng; ICN Pharmaceuticals) in Hepes-buffered CZB medium (Hepes-CZB) [14]. The oocytes were washed thoroughly and kept in CZB for up to 2 h at 37°C under 5% CO2 in air. Oocytes to be injected with spermatozoa were transferred into a droplet (6 µl) of Hepes-CBZ under mineral oil (Squibb and Sons, Princeton, NJ) in an operation dish on the microscope stage [14].
Sperm Injection
Sperm nuclei treated with ATAB+DTT were washed in Hepes-CZB containing 6% polyvinylpyrrolidone immediately before ICSI. A single sperm nucleus was aspirated into the injection pipette attached to the micromanipulator and injected into an oocyte according to the method described by Kimura and Yanagimachi [14] except that all operations were carried out at room temperature (about 25°C) instead of 1617°C. Approximately 10 min after sperm injection, the oocytes were transferred into Ca2+-free CZB containing 5 mM SrCl2 and incubated for 1 h to activate them [15]. Unlike fresh spermatozoa [14], sperm nuclei washed with ATAB+DTT could not activate oocytes when injected into them, so incubation in SrCl2 was necessary to activate the oocytes. Sperm-injected oocytes were incubated for about 5 h in CZB medium and examined with an inverted microscope. Those with two distinct pronuclei and the second polar body were considered normally fertilized.
Embryo Transfer to Foster Mothers
Two-cell embryos arising from normally fertilized eggs were transferred to oviducts of ICR (albino) female mice that had mated with vasectomized males of the same strain during the previous night [16]. Females were allowed to deliver and raise their foster pups (black eyes and pigmented coats).
Electron Microscopy
Sperm heads were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer, embedded in Spurr (Ladd Research Industries, Burlington, VT), and thin-sectioned for transmission electron microscopy.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several groups have suggested that chromatin structure may play an important role in embryogenesis [17, 18]. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a stable nuclear matrix may contribute to the participation of the paternal genome in embryogenesis. We developed treatments under which the mouse sperm nuclear matrix was either stable or unstable using very similar buffer conditions. In this manner, these different treatments of mouse sperm nuclei used for ICSI could be interpreted more accurately.
The test we used for nuclear matrix stability was to extract treated nuclei with 2 M NaCl and 2 mM DTT to remove the protamines. The nuclear structures that resulted were examined by staining with ethidium bromide under fluorescence microscopy. Sperm nuclei with stable nuclear matrices will form nuclear halos under these conditions [1, 19]. Nuclear halos are prepared from nuclei by extracting the protamines with salt buffer. The nuclear matrix, the skeletal component of the sperm nucleus, retains the original hooked shape of the nucleus, and the DNA emanates from the nuclear matrix in the form of loops, creating a halo of DNA surrounding the nuclear matrix [1, 19].
We found that the nuclei of spermatozoa washed with NIM-ATAB without DTT formed nuclear halos when extracted with 2 M NaCl + 2 mM DTT, indicating that this treatment resulted in sperm nuclei with stable nuclear matrices (Fig. 1B). However, for spermatozoa treated with NIM-ATAB/DTT, the nuclear matrices completely decondensed when extraction was carried out with NaCl+DTT (Fig. 1C). Surprisingly, when NIM-ATAB/DTT was prepared and incubated at 4°C for 1 wk, the nuclei formed nuclear halos when extracted with 2 M NaCl+DTT, indicating that the nuclear matrices were stable (Table 1). These data suggested to us that treating mouse spermatozoa with 0.5% ATAB in the presence of 2 mM DTT destabilized the nuclear matrix, but only when the buffer was freshly prepared. To ensure that this impressive difference in nuclear structure seen after storage for 1 wk was due only to the presence of DTT in the NIM-ATAB/DTT extraction buffer, we repeated the experiment using 1-wk-old NIM-ATAB/DTT to which additional DTT was added on the day of the experiment. These nuclei decondensed in the presence of 2 M NaCl. The results were consistent with the conclusion that DTT in the presence of ATAB was destabilizing the nuclear matrix (Table 1).
|
|
Evidence That DTT Loses Most of Its Disulfide-Reducing Ability after One Week
The nuclear matrix stabilization assay (Fig. 1, Table 1) data suggested to us that the DTT lost its ability to reduce disulfides during the 1 wk of storage in NIM-ATAB/DTT. To test this hypothesis we examined the ability of 2 M NaCl alone to extract the protamines from the treated mouse sperm nuclei. Hamster [19], human [20], and mouse (unpublished results) sperm nuclei either decondense completely or form nuclear halo structures when the protamines are extracted with 2 M NaCl in the presence of DTT. Without DTT, 2 M NaCl cannot extract the protamines from mammalian sperm nuclei since they are cross-linked by disulfide bonds [21]. When mouse spermatozoa were treated with freshly prepared NIM-ATAB/DTT and then extracted with 2 M NaCl in the absence of additional DTT, the nuclei decondensed completely (Fig. 1C, Table 1). This suggested that the DTT in the fresh NIM-ATAB/DTT was still capable of reducing the intramolecular disulfide bonds between the protamines. When the experiment was repeated with 1-wk-old NIM-ATAB/DTT, however, the nuclei remained condensed, indicating no evidence of protamine extraction (Fig. 1A, Table 1). This suggested that after 1 wk of storage the DTT had lost its ability to reduce the protamine disulfide bonds. When DTT was later added to the 2 M NaCl extraction buffer as a control, the nuclear halos did form, indicating successful extraction of the protamines (Table 1).
Electron Microscopy of ATAB-Treated Spermatozoa
Ultrastructural examination of sperm nuclei showed that most of the perinuclear theca was removed by treatment with NIM-ATAB, with or without DTT. After exposure to NIM-ATAB (without DTT), sperm chromatin remained condensed and uniformly electron dense (Fig. 2, Type I nuclei, and Table 2). ATAB treatment in the presence of DTT resulted in pronounced foci of decondensed chromatin in the center of most of the nuclei (Fig. 2, Type III nuclei, and Table 2), although they appeared intact when visualized by light microscopy. However, when the NIM-ATAB/DTT was allowed to age for 1 wk before use, this ultrastructural change was less extensive and was seen to have occurred in fewer sperm nuclei (Fig. 2, Types II and III, and Table 2).
|
|
Development of Oocytes Injected with ATAB-Treated Sperm Nuclei
The data from the nuclear matrix stabilization assay (Fig. 1 and Table 1) suggested that the nuclei from spermatozoa washed with freshly prepared NIM-ATAB/DTT were not stable, but nuclei washed in the same buffer that was stored at 4°C for 1 wk contained stable nuclear matrices. The evidence suggested that the DTT had lost most of its ability to reduce the protamine disulfide bonds during this storage, even though electron microscopy suggested that the buffer contained some reducing ability. This gave us a method to treat spermatozoa using the same buffer that resulted in spermatozoa with different nuclear matrix stabilities.
Mouse oocytes injected with sperm nuclei that were treated with freshly prepared or 1-wk-old NIM-ATAB/DTT both developed to the pronuclear stage (Table 3). There was a slight decrease in the number of oocytes that developed to this stage using fresh buffer, 76% compared to 93% for the week-old buffer. However, only those nuclei that were treated with 1-wk-old NIM-ATAB/DTT, which contained stable nuclear matrices, had the ability to participate fully in embryogenesis after ICSI (Table 4).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We also found that only sperm nuclei treated with NIM-ATAB/DTT that had been stored for 1 wk were capable of participating in embryogenesis when used for ICSI. Nuclei treated with fresh NIM-ATAB/DTT were not. Two lines of evidence suggested that the major difference between the freshly prepared and 1-wk-old NIM-ATAB/DTT was that in the latter, the DTT was oxidized. First, electron micrographs indicated that sperm nuclei treated with fresh NIM-ATAB/DTT were slightly decondensed, while those that were treated with week-old buffer were not. Second, 2 M NaCl was capable of extracting the protamines from sperm nuclei treated with fresh NIM-ATAB/DTT without additional DTT, while those washed with week-old buffer required additional DTT. In both treatments, however, the perinuclear theca was removed.
The data suggested that the presence of DTT in the initial ATAB extraction buffer could destroy the ability of the sperm nucleus to participate in embryogenesis, but the reason for this was not immediately clear. DTT would not be expected to damage the DNA directly, and it is unlikely that the sperm nucleus would contain any DNases that were activated by DTT (the only other explanation for DNA damage we could identify). We therefore examined the possibility that DTT in the presence of ATAB was destabilizing the nuclear matrix and that this destabilization is what was important for inhibiting embryogenesis. We have previously demonstrated that the sperm DNA contains a complex organization and have suggested that this organization may be important for embryogenesis [1, 17, 20]. Sperm DNA is organized into loop domains that are attached by specific sequences to the structural component of the nucleus, the sperm nuclear matrix, and this organization is different from that of somatic cells [13, 17]. This DNA loop structure is known to be important for DNA replication [4] and for gene regulation [5], so it is possible that sperm DNA loop domain organization plays a role in the regulation of the paternal genome during embryogenesis.
The data in this work suggest, though they do not yet prove, that this may be the case. We found that sperm nuclei treated with freshly prepared NIM-ATAB/DTT completely decondensed when extracted with 2 M NaCl, but that NIM-ATAB with no DTT (or week-old NIM-ATAB/DTT) formed nuclear halos when extracted with salt and DTT. This suggested that the nuclear matrices and the overall DNA loop domain organization was much more stable in those nuclei treated with ATAB alone. Those nuclei that were still capable of forming nuclear halos when the protamines were extracted could also participate in embryogenesis (e.g., week-old NIM-ATAB/DTT), but those that decondensed when the protamines were extracted could not (Table 4). It is possible that washing sperm nuclei with ATAB in the presence of DTT also affects other aspects of sperm chromatin structure that are also necessary for embryonic development, and further experimentation will be necessary to identify these. It is clear, however, from these experiments that the nuclear matrix is destabilized by this treatment and that these nuclei cannot participate in embryonic development.
It is very clear from many previous experiments that DTT in the absence of any ionic detergent does not destabilize the nuclear matrix [1, 17]. In fact, DTT is necessary to extract the protamines so that nuclear halos can be formed. The data in this work demonstrate that it is only when DTT is included in the presence of ATAB, an ionic detergent, that the nuclear matrix is destabilized. There are at least two possible mechanisms for this. The first is that since the nuclei treated with fresh NIM-ATAB/DTT are slightly decondensed, it is probable that some of the protamines have been extracted, thereby exposing the nuclear matrix to ATAB. This may allow the ATAB to solubilize or denature some structural nuclear matrix proteins. This possibility is supported by the demonstration that the sperm nuclei show a slight decondensation when treated with ATAB in the presence of DTT (Fig. 2). The second possibility is that there are some nuclear matrix proteins that are temporarily denatured in the presence of ATAB, exposing intermolecular cross-links necessary for the overall stability of the nuclear matrix. This may also explain why only 30% of the sperm nuclei treated with week-old NIM-ATAB/DTT were capable of participating in embryogenesis.
These data suggest that the sperm nucleus is the only component of the spermatozoa that is required for full participation in embryogenesis. They also provide the first evidence that the structural organization of DNA in the sperm nucleus may be crucial for proper development.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Correspondence: W. Steven Ward, Division of Urology, MEB-588, RWJMS, 1 RWJ Pl, New Brunswick, NJ 08903. FAX: 732 235 6042; sward{at}umdnj.edu ![]()
Accepted: October 15, 1998.
Received: August 20, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. C Wilkerson and K. D Sarge RNA polymerase II interacts with the Hspa1b promoter in mouse epididymal spermatozoa Reproduction, June 1, 2009; 137(6): 923 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, E. Mizutani, T. Ono, and T. Wakayama Production of normal mice from spermatozoa denatured with high alkali treatment before ICSI Reproduction, May 1, 2009; 137(5): 779 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.A. Finch, K.G.L. Fonseka, A. Abogrein, D. Ioannou, A.H. Handyside, A.R. Thornhill, N. Hickson, and D.K. Griffin Nuclear organization in human sperm: preliminary evidence for altered sex chromosome centromere position in infertile males Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1263 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Codrington, B. F. Hales, and B. Robaire Chronic Cyclophosphamide Exposure Alters the Profile of Rat Sperm Nuclear Matrix Proteins Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 303 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. McGinnis, L. Zhu, J. A. Lawitts, S. Bhowmick, M. Toner, and J. D. Biggers Mouse Sperm Desiccated and Stored in Trehalose Medium Without Freezing Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. S. Barton, B. Robaire, and B. F. Hales Epigenetic programming in the preimplantation rat embryo is disrupted by chronic paternal cyclophosphamide exposure PNAS, May 31, 2005; 102(22): 7865 - 7870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Hales, T. S. Barton, and B. Robaire Impact of Paternal Exposure to Chemotherapy on Offspring in the Rat J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, March 1, 2005; 2005(34): 28 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Martins, G. C. Ostermeier, and S. A. Krawetz Nuclear Matrix Interactions at the Human Protamine Domain: A WORKING MODEL OF POTENTIATION J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 2004; 279(50): 51862 - 51868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.-K. Kwon, K.-E. Park, and K. Niwa Activation, Pronuclear Formation, and Development In Vitro of Pig Oocytes Following Intracytoplasmic Injection of Freeze-Dried Spermatozoa Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1430 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Lacham-Kaplan, J. Shaw, L. G. Sanchez-Partida, and A. Trounson Oocyte Activation after Intracytoplasmic Injection with Sperm Frozen Without Cryoprotectants Results in Live Offspring from Inbred and Hybrid Mouse Strains Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1683 - 1689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Wykes and S. A. Krawetz The Structural Organization of Sperm Chromatin J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29471 - 29477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Cho, H. Jung-Ha, W. D. Willis, E. H. Goulding, P. Stein, Z. Xu, R. M. Schultz, N. B. Hecht, and E. M. Eddy Protamine 2 Deficiency Leads to Sperm DNA Damage and Embryo Death in Mice Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 211 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bhowmick, L. Zhu, L. McGinnis, J. Lawitts, B. D. Nath, M. Toner, and J. Biggers Desiccation Tolerance of Spermatozoa Dried at Ambient Temperature: Production of Fetal Mice Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1779 - 1786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cozzi, F. Monier-Gavelle, N. Lievre, M. Bomsel, and J.P. Wolf Mouse Offspring after Microinjection of Heated Spermatozoa Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1518 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. V. Klaus, J. R. McCarrey, A. Farkas, and W. S. Ward Changes in DNA Loop Domain Structure During Spermatogenesis and Embryogenesis in the Syrian Golden Hamster Biol Reprod, May 1, 2001; 64(5): 1297 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. Harrouk, B. Robaire, and B. F. Hales Paternal Exposure to Cyclophosphamide Alters Cell-Cell Contacts and Activation of Embryonic Transcription in the Preimplantation Rat Embryo Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 74 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |