Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 1410-1418 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Microelectrophoretic Analysis of Changes in Protein Expression Patterns in Mouse Oocytes and Preimplantation Embryos1

Rieko Sasakia, Takashi Nakayamaa, and Takahiko Kato2,a

a Department of Biochemistry I, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
One- and two-dimensional polyacrylamide microslab gel electrophoresis followed by silver staining was devised to visualize picogram to nanogram levels of proteins and was applied to the analysis of 1–20 mouse oocytes and embryos (approximately 16.5–330 ng of protein) during preimplantation development. Compared with values in embryos, more bands in the higher molecular weight range were found only for unfertilized oocytes in one-dimensional microelectrophoresis. A marked decrease in the number of protein spots occurred after fertilization in two-dimensional microelectrophoresis. Both findings indicate a decrease in maternal proteins caused by fertilization. Silver-staining densities were almost invariable for 8 major spots, but increased, decreased, or varied for 32 minor spots in developing embryos from the 1-cell to the morula stage, signifying spot-specific changes in the expression of zygotic proteins during development. The protein patterns in cumulus cells and blastocysts were different from those in oocytes and embryos. Even in a single 1-cell embryo, major spots and some minor spots were detectable by our two-dimensional microelectrophoretic technique, but many more minor spots were visualized in five 1-cell embryos, exemplifying the limit of our microelectrophoretic technique. As a preliminary result, a two-dimensional immunoblot pattern is shown for glucose transporter 1 expressed in morulae.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
After fertilization, the mammalian oocyte switches its genetic information source from the maternal to the zygotic genes and proceeds with cell proliferation and differentiation during preimplantation development [1]. The cell differentiation is relatively simple, terminating in the formation of two morphologically different cell species, the trophectoderm and inner cell mass, at the blastocyst stage [1, 2]. To characterize this proliferation and differentiation process, the patterns of protein synthesis rates have been tracked in the majority of previous studies by in vitro labeling of the proteins synthesized in the presence of L-[35S]methionine because of the paucity of experimental materials and the high sensitivity of autoradiography (see Discussion). Since we wanted to characterize the patterns and nature of proteins themselves synthesized and present at the stages of preimplantation development, we devised a one- and two-dimensional microelectrophoretic technique to visualize stained bands and spots containing picogram to nanogram levels of proteins from a small number of mouse oocytes and embryos; we then attempted to apply our two-dimensional microelectrophoresis to immunoblotting of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), one of the isoforms of facilitated glucose transporter [3].


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oocyte and Embryo Samples

All experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Research Animals promulgated by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, and all protocols were approved by the Yokohama City University Committee on Animal Research. Adult female B6C3F1 mice (Sankyo Lab., Tokyo, Japan) were superovulated by i.p. injection with 5 IU of eCG (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) followed 48 h later by 5 IU of hCG (Sigma). The female mice were individually housed with males immediately after hCG injection and were checked for vaginal plugs the next morning as evidence for mating. All oocytes and embryos were flushed from the oviducts and uteri into sterile plastic collection dishes (35 mm in diameter) with M2 medium (Sigma) at 37°C; then morphologically well-preserved samples were selected under a microscope. Using a capillary pipette, the samples were washed 6–7 times with PBS (pH 7.4) containing 3 mg/ml polyvinylpyrrolidone (Sigma) and protease inhibitors (0.5 mM p-amidinophenylmethane-sulfonyl fluoride [Sigma]; 1 mg/ml leupeptin [Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan]; 1 mg/ml pepstatin [Sigma]) at 37°C. One-cell embryos were obtained 28 h after hCG injection. At 12-h intervals, embryos were collected at the 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, morula, and blastocyst stages. Unfertilized oocytes were collected 16 h after hCG injection from the oviducts of unmated females. Unfertilized oocytes and 1-cell embryos surrounded by cumulus cells were exposed to hyaluronidase (300 IU/ml) in M2 medium for about 5 min and then cleaned thoroughly with the same M2 medium by being repeatedly drawn in and out of a capillary pipette to shear off the cumulus cells. One to twenty oocytes or embryos in a small volume (53 nl to 1 µl) of PBS were placed at the bottom of a small well (2 x 2 mm) of a Terasaki plate (Sumitomo Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan) filled with paraffin oil to prevent evaporation, and then stored at -80°C until use. In previous work, fresh oocytes and embryos were freeze-dried, and the dry weight was individually determined by weighing on a highly sensitive quartz-fiber fish pole balance [4].

Cumulus Cell Sample

The mass of cumulus cells adhering to unfertilized oocytes was mechanically sheared off and isolated by the freehand operation of a pair of homemade glass needles in PBS, and the cell mass was used as a sample. Precise protein amounts or dry weights of the samples were not measurable, since the cell mass was too small to assay proteins and since it disintegrated on freeze-drying in attempts to prepare aggregates of freeze-dried cells. Therefore, the cumulus cell mass in about one third the volume of 20 oocytes surrounded by cumulus cells was subjected to our two-dimensional electrophoresis. This volume seemed similar to that of a group of 20 oocytes.

Human Erythrocyte Membrane Sample

As a control sample for one-dimensional microelectrophoresis and two-dimensional immunoblot, human erythrocyte ghosts were prepared using the procedure of Steck and Kant [5] and suspended at 1.43 mg of protein/ml in PBS. The protein concentration was determined by the method of Lowry et al. [6] with BSA as a standard.

One-Dimensional Microelectrophoresis

Polyacrylamide microslab gels were prepared in a small mold (37 x 37 x 1 mm; Fujiriken, Tokyo, Japan [7]), and microelectrophoresis was performed on a smaller scale than described previously [8] (see Fig. 1). A single oocyte or embryo stored frozen in a 53-nl droplet under paraffin oil was thawed, and 500 nl of lysis buffer [9] was added to the droplet. This droplet mixture contained 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% (w:v) SDS, 5% (v:v) mercaptoethanol, 10% (v:v) glycerol, and 0.2% (w:v) bromophenol blue as a tracking dye and was incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The mixture was added to a microwell (0.5 x 0.5 x 7 mm) of a 5% (w:v) SDS-polyacrylamide stacking gel (10 x 37 x 1 mm); electrophoresis was performed for 26 min at 5 mA to concentrate the proteins in the stacking gel and then for 22 min at 10 mA in the 10-mm range of the 10% (w:v) SDS-polyacrylamide separating gel (27 x 37 x 1 mm). The microwells were built into the stacking gel using a handmade comb, which consisted of a silicone strip (3 x 40 x 1 mm) and 13 thin silicone bars (0.5 x 0.5 x 10 mm; Disco Co., Tokyo, Japan) glued at equal spaces to the strip as teeth. After electrophoresis, the separating gel was subjected to silver staining.



View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. One-dimensional gel electrophoresis of individual unfertilized oocytes and 2-cell embryos. A) The gel size is shown with reference to a pen. The numbers at the left identify molecular weights of marker proteins as follows: 1 is alkaline phosphatase, Mr 106 000; 2 is BSA, Mr 80 000; 3 is ovalbumin, Mr 49 500; 4 is carbonic anhydrase, Mr 32 500; these are prestained low range standard proteins, Bio-Rad Lab., Hercules, CA). B) Magnified photograph of part of A. As indicated below the figure, human erythrocyte membrane ghosts were electrophoresed as a control (lanes 1–3) in parallel with individual oocytes (lanes 4–6) and 2-cell embryos (lanes 7–9). The amounts of samples are indicated below the lanes. The oocyte in lane 4 was degenerated and the protein bands are not clearly identifiable. The numbers beside the bands of erythrocyte membrane proteins in lane 2 correspond to those previously reported (see text).

Two-Dimensional Microelectrophoresis

A separating gradient microslab gel (35 x 37 x 1 mm), consisting of a 4–17% (w:v) polyacrylamide gradient, was prepared as described above [7, 10], and microelectrophoresis was carried out based on O'Farrell's method [11]. The pH gradient ranged from 5 to 7 for the first-dimensional electrofocusing. The focusing gel solution contained 8 M urea (Gibco BRL, Gaithersberg, MD), 4% (w:v) acrylamide, 2% (w:v) 3-[(3-cholaminopropil)-dimethylamino]-1-propane sulfonate (Sigma), and 2% (v:v) ampholine pH 5–7 and 0.5% (v:v) ampholine pH 3.5–10 (Sigma). After the addition of 1.0 µl of lysis solution, the oocytes and embryos were incubated and solubilized at 37°C for 30 min in a droplet mixture containing 8 M urea, 2% (w:v) SDS, 5% (v:v) mercaptoethanol, and 2.0% (v:v) ampholines in the same ratio as for the focusing gel. The solubilized sample was loaded into a capillary tube (35 x 1 mm); isoelectric focusing was carried out for 20 min at a constant current of 0.1 mA per tube, and then for 80 min at 300 V constant voltage. For electrofocusing of proteins from a single embryo or 5 embryos, a shorter capillary (20 x 1 mm) was used to prepare a shorter gel rod to concentrate the proteins at the focusing points. After electrofocusing, the gel rod was removed from the capillary tube and placed on top of the 4–17% acrylamide gradient gel covered with equilibrium buffer containing 4.58% (w:v) Tris, 3.84 mM HCl, 0.03% (v:v) N,N,N,N-tetra-methylethylenediamine, and 2% (w:v) SDS. The acrylamide gradient spanned a microslab gel from top to bottom for electrophoresing 20 oocytes or embryos; but a half-height gradient gel (18 x 37 x 1 mm), laid on a 17% acrylamide bottom gel (17 x 37 x 1 mm), was formed for electrophoresing 1 or 5 embryos. Electrophoresis was performed at 10 mA per microslab gel for 20–45 min at room temperature. In some cases, molecular weight marker proteins were added to a well (0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 mm) built into the left edge of the gradient gel and then electrophoresed in parallel with sample proteins electrofocused in a pH-gradient gel rod. After electrophoresis, the gradient gels were subjected to silver staining.

Silver Staining and Determination of Staining Density

After one- or two-dimensional microelectrophoresis, the resolved protein bands and spots were visualized by silver staining with a silver-staining kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The two-dimensional patterns of the stained proteins were photographed using 400 Provia Fujichrome film (Fuji Film, Tokyo, Japan), and the images on the color slide films were scanned with a Nikon Coolscan II (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and stored in a Power Macintosh 8100 (Cupertino, CA). After the blue images were separated from the red and green images using Adobe Photoshop (Mountain View, CA) software, the blue-color intensities of the spots were measured using the NIH (Bethesda, MD) Image program. The gray values representing staining densities were processed using the ANOVA analysis tool of the Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) program for factorial nonrepeated analysis [12].

Immunoblot Analysis after Microelectrophoresis

After two-dimensional microelectrophoresis, the separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (pore size, 0.45 µm; 45 x 35 mm; Millipore, Bedford, MA) at 1 mA/cm2 for 60 min. The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with 5% skim milk (Difco Lab., Detroit, MI) in a blocking solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% (v:v) Tween 20. Immunoblot analysis was carried out using antiserum against the carboxyl terminus (472-492 polypeptide, donated by Dr. Nagamatsu, S., Department of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Kyorin University, Tokyo, Japan) of GLUT1 in the blocking solution for 2 h at room temperature. Immunoreactivity of GLUT1 was identified using a kit for streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method (Amersham Life Science, Buckinghamshire, UK).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
One-Dimensional Microelectrophoresis Patterns of Single Oocytes and 2-Cell Embryos

As a control, erythrocyte membrane proteins were electrophoresed, and clearly identifiable bands were numbered (Fig. 1) with reference to previous reports [1315]. This signifies that our one-dimensional electrophoresis method is sound for analyzing single oocytes and embryos. According to our previous experiments, the dry weights of single oocytes and embryos show a tendency to decrease from unfertilized oocytes to blastocysts, but the average dry weight does not vary significantly among unfertilized oocytes and embryos at all preimplantation developmental stages (32.9 ± 1.9 [SD] ng dry weight for all 371 oocytes and embryos weighed; see Fig. 1 in [4]). On the plausible assumption that 50% of the dry mass is protein (see Discussion), the average protein content of single oocytes and embryos was calculated to be approximately 16.5 ng. Thus, the amounts of sample proteins were of a similar order of magnitude in erythrocyte membranes, unfertilized oocytes, and 2-cell embryos (Fig. 1). The protein bands in the oocyte in lane 4 are not clear; this indicates that the oocyte sample had degenerated. The two other oocytes showed a few bands in the range of 290 kDa (band 2, spectrin) to 72 kDa (band 4.2), including bands 3 (anion exchanger, 90 kDa) and 4.1 (glycophorin A, 79 kDa) found in erythrocyte membrane proteins [1416]. These bands were not found or were faintly stained in the electrophoresis patterns of 2-cell embryos. In addition, broad and faintly stained bands were observable only in oocytes under the strongly stained band at approximately 70 kDa that is common to both oocytes and embryos. These findings suggest that some proteins present in unfertilized oocytes decrease in amount or disappear in 2-cell embryos (see also Fig. 2). No significant difference in the electrophoresis patterns was evident among different oocytes or different 2-cell embryos.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Silver-stained spots in unfertilized oocytes, embryos, and cumulus cells. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of 20 oocytes and embryos at each developmental stage was performed, and representative protein patterns are shown. For comparison, isolated cumulus cells were analyzed in a volume seemingly equivalent to the volumes of the oocyte and embryo samples (see Materials and Methods). The major spots were numbered as indicated in the pattern for 4-cell embryos. Note that about 230 spots are differently distributed in the oocyte pattern, as compared with 80–100 spots in embryo samples, and that the pattern in cumulus cells is completely different from those of oocytes and embryos. The blastocyst pattern appears to differ from those of embryos at other stages. The scales for pI and molecular weight are shown in Figure 5.

Two-Dimensional Protein Patterns Observed by Silver Staining for Unfertilized Oocytes, Preimplantation Embryos, and Cumulus Cells

The overall patterns of proteins in oocytes, embryos, and cumulus cells are shown in Figure 2. Amounts of protein in 20 oocytes and embryos were approximately 330 ng, as described above. Since 30 and 60 morulae yielded visible spots similar to those of 20 morulae (data not shown), 20 oocytes and embryos were analyzed at all developmental stages. The amount of protein in the cumulus cell samples could not be determined but was thought to be similar to the amounts in 20 oocytes and embryos (for reason, see Materials and Methods). Visually the protein pattern of cumulus cells is completely different from those of unfertilized oocytes and embryos. Many more spots are observable in oocytes than in embryos, which show similar numbers of stained spots.

Surprisingly, approximately 230 spots could easily be counted in the silver-staining protein pattern of unfertilized oocytes, many of which were only faintly present or were absent from embryos. In contrast, 80–100 spots were visualized at each preimplantation stage. This signifies that the protein species expressed by maternal genes decrease or disappear after fertilization, as already suggested from the bands present in single oocytes that disappear from single 2-cell embryos (Fig. 1) in one-dimensional electrophoresis.

Staining Densities and Major Protein Spots in Preimplantation Embryos

The staining densities of BSA spots with variable areas were plotted against the amounts of BSA per spot in a model experiment (Fig. 3). The larger the amount, the stronger the density; but the relationship was not linear and seemed to saturate at high levels of density. Among all spots in embryos, eight major spots (numbered from M1 to M8 as shown in the 4-cell embryo pattern in Figure 2) were intensely stained, and those densities seemed to remain invariable during development, suggesting that the major spots represent fundamental structural or functional proteins. Similar major spots, corresponding to these 8 major spots in embryos, were detected in unfertilized oocytes, but not in the cumulus cells. The major spot distribution was different in the blastocyst as compared with 1-cell to morula-stage embryos (Fig. 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Staining intensities of BSA spots in two microslab gels in a model experiment for density determination. Spots of BSA (measurement area, 2.57–6.04 mm2) after one-dimensional electrophoresis were silver stained, and the staining densities (gray values) were determined using the NIH Image program (see Materials and Methods). Densities were plotted as a function of total amount (ng) of BSA per spot.

The staining density curves for the 8 major spots differed significantly for three protein patterns from three different batches of 20 two-cell embryos (Fig. 4A). The average staining density of the 8 major spots was calculated as a basis for normalization. The normalized density curves did not vary significantly among batches, but the individual major spots showed significant differences (Fig. 4B). Thus, normalization is thought to be able to cancel the differences in staining efficiency for different microslab gels, retaining the characteristic staining densities of different spots. Actually, normalization produced the same effects on the major spots from different developmental stages (Fig. 4C) from 1-cell to morula, during which similarities in the appearance and position of each major spot were found (Fig. 2).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Density patterns of 8 major spots in 3 stained microslab gels at the 2-cell stage and during embryonal development. A) The densities (gray values) of silver-stained major spots (0.83–5.28 mm2) obtained from 20 two-cell embryos were determined in 3 different microslab gels (solid circles, open circles, solid squares; gel solid circles = gel open circles in Fig. 4C), each of which showed a protein pattern with different staining efficiency. The gray value was plotted directly on the ordinate against a species of major spot on the abscissa. The densities were evaluated by two-factor ANOVA with group (each major spot) as the between-subjects factor and 3 different gels as the within-subject factor [12]. This 8 x 3 factorial nonrepeated analysis showed that the density difference for each major spot is significant between different gels (p < 0.01), and that the 8 major spots differ in their densities in each microslab gel (p < 0.01). B) Thus, the average density was calculated for the 8 major spots in each gel, and the ratio between the density of each major spot and the average density was calculated to normalize the density values in each slab gel. The normalized density curves are similar, and the 8 x 3 factorial analysis as in A showed no difference between 3 gels (p > 0.1); but statistical differences between each species of major spot were found (p < 0.01). C) Well-stained gels were selected for all developmental stages (as shown in Fig. 2). The average density of the major spots was calculated for each developmental stage from 1-cell to morula; all show a similar electrophoresis pattern. The normalized densities of the major spots were calculated and plotted for these 5 stages (solid circles, 1-cell; open circles, 2-cell; solid squares, 4-cell; open squares, 8-cell; triangles, morula). The normalized density curves are similar, and the 8 x 5 factorial analysis with group (major spots) as the between-subjects factor and developmental stage as the within-subject factor [12], as in A, showed no difference between developmental stages (p > 0.1) but a significant difference between each species of major spot (p < 0.01).

Minor Protein Spots in Preimplantation Embryos

The other stained spots were smaller and stained more weakly than the 8 major spots; these, called minor spots, were easily localized and numbered using the major spots as a guide (Fig. 5). The distribution of minor spots was different in the blastocyst compared with other embryos from the 1-cell to the morula stage (Fig. 2). The normalized densities of these 32 minor spots in each microslab gel were plotted against the spot numbers to obtain a density curve for comparison of staining patterns among different gels (Fig. 6). The three normalized curves did not differ significantly among three gels at the 2-cell stage (Fig. 6A), showing that different staining efficiencies could be normalized as for the 8 major spots (Fig. 4). The patterns of 5 density curves for 32 spots at each stage from 1-cell to morula were significantly different (Fig. 6B), indicating that changes in protein expression patterns do occur during preimplantation development. When the 32 minor spots were divided into three groups according to the tendencies of their densities to change, 50% increased in staining density (Fig. 7A), 19% decreased (Fig. 7B), and the remainder (31%) showed variable tendencies (Fig. 7C).



View larger version (119K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Silver-stained minor spots of 20 one-cell embryos (about 330 ng of protein). An enlarged view of the stained microslab gel in Figure 2 is given with the scales of pI and molecular weight. Thirty-two minor spots, well-stained and visualized at the 1-cell to morula stages, were arbitrarily numbered for density measurement as well as major spots M1 to M8 as shown in Figure 2. The measurement areas for 32 minor spots ranged from 0.21 to 1.94 mm2. A whole untrimmed microslab gel is shown with a double-headed arrow indicating gel size at the right.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Density patterns of 32 minor spots in 3 different microslab gels at the 2-cell stage and during embryonal development from the 1-cell to the morula stage. A) The normalized densities of 32 minor spots shown in Figure 5 were calculated in 3 different microslab gels as described and indicated by the same symbols as in Figure 4, A and B (solid circles, open circles, solid squares; gel solid circles = gel open circles in Fig. 6B). The 3 normalized density curves are similar, and the 32 x 3 factorial analysis as described in Figure 4, A and B, shows no difference among the 3 gels (p > 0.097); but statistically significant differences between each species of minor spot were found (p < 0.01). B) Similar normalized density curves are shown for 32 minor spots at different developmental stages (solid circles, 1-cell; open circles, 2-cell; solid squares, 4-cell; open squares, 8-cell; triangles, morula) as described and indicated by the same symbols as in Figure 4C. The normalized density curves are heterogenous and differ markedly for each developmental stage; and the 32 x 5 factorial analysis, as described in Figure 4C, shows the statistical differences between developmental stages as well as between each species of minor spot (p < 0.01).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Different transitions of normalized staining densities in 3 groups for 32 minor spots from the 1-cell to the morula stage. All 32 spots could be divided into 3 groups according to the mode of transition of their densities during development: A) 16 spots with a tendency to increase; B) 6 spots with a tendency to decrease; C) 10 spots showing a variable tendency. Factorial nonrepeated analyses using ANOVA were performed for group (each minor spot) as the between-subjects factor and developmental stage as the within-subject factor [12]. A) From the top symbol at the morula stage, spots 14, 21, 6, 16, 27, 20, 11, 15, 22, 5, 24, 17, 4, 23, 29, and 3; the 16 x 5 factorial analysis showed significant differences (p < 0.01) between each spot and between developmental stages. Tukey's post hoc test indicated an insignificant increase between the 1-cell and 2-cell stages, between the 1-cell and 4-cell stages, and between 2-cell and 4-cell (p > 0.1); a significant increase, 1-cell < 8-cell at p < 0.05; a significant increase between other stages (p < 0.01). B) From the top at the 1-cell stage, spots 19, 12, 2, 25, 1, and 18; the 6 x 5 factorial analysis yielded differences similar to those in A, and Tukey's post hoc test indicated 1-cell > 4-cell and 8-cell > morula (p < 0.05); 1-cell, 2-cell > morula (p < 0.01); insignificant difference between other stages (p > 0.1). C) From the top at the 1-cell stage, spots 32, 7, 8, 28, 13, 9, 31, 10, 26, and 30; the 10 x 5 factorial analysis yielded the same results as in A, and Tukey's post hoc test indicated 1-cell > 8-cell (p < 0.05); 1-cell > 2-cell, 1-cell > 4-cell, and 4-cell < morula (p < 0.01); no significant differences were found among other stages (p > 0.1).

Protein Spots of One and Five Embryos

In order to elucidate differences among individual embryos, 1 and 5 one-cell embryos were analyzed in a reduced area (20 x 20 mm2) with the same gradient and pI range as for two-dimensional electrophoresis (Fig. 8). Compared with observations in the 20 embryos shown in Figures 2 and 5, fewer spots were visualized because the amount of protein in such a small number of embryos is too low for visualization of some minor spots. However, some major spots were easily detected from 1 and 5 embryos and did not appear to differ much in their relative staining densities. Nevertheless, individual differences were not obvious as far as the resolution sensitivity of the present ultra-microelectrophoretic technique is concerned.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Silver-stained protein patterns of one and five 1-cell embryos. A single embryo (A, about 16.5 ng of protein) and 5 embryos (B, about 82.5 ng of protein) were analyzed using a shorter gel rod (20 x 1 mm) for electrofocusing and a half-height gradient gel (18 x 37 x 1) to form smaller spots in the range of area one fourth (20 x 20 mm2) that for usual microelectrophoresis (see Materials and Methods). The area (10.4 x 10.4 mm2) around major spot M3 is shown to compare the staining intensities of spots visualized in 1 embryo and 5 embryos. For the ranges of molecular weight and pH, refer to Figure 5. Note that many more minor spots, although faintly stained, are found in the ultramicroslab gel for 5 embryos (B) than in the ultramicroslab gel for 1 embryo (A).

Two-Dimensional Micro-Immunoblot of GLUT1 in Morulae and Erythrocyte Membranes

To preliminarily demonstrate the efficiency of the present two-dimensional microelectrophoresis, the immunostaining patterns of GLUT1 are shown in Figure 9. The control erythrocyte membranes show a vaguely stained and longitudinal band centered at pI 6.6. In contrast, the morulae manifest two groups of stained spots centered at pIs 6.4 and 6.6 and distributed in a wide range of pI gradient. In each group, GLUT1 tended to self-associate in the detergent solution around the oligomeric positions of 55-kDa monomer.



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. GLUT1 immunostaining patterns of mouse morulae and human erythrocyte membranes. Twenty morulae (about 330 ng of protein) and erythrocyte ghosts (200 ng of protein) as a control were subjected to immunoblotting as described in Materials and Methods. Note that the patterns for morulae show two pIs and GLUT1 aggregates spreading in wide pI ranges, and around monomeric (55 kDa) and oligomeric positions, i.e., 110 kDa, 165 kDa, and so on.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Protein Content of Oocytes and Embryos

On the basis of our previous results obtained by weighing freeze-dried samples of individual mouse oocytes and embryos (Fig. 1 in [4]), we assumed that the average protein content of individual mouse oocytes and embryos is approximately 16.5 ng as 50% of dry weight or 10% of wet weight [17, 18]. Previous reports suggest average protein contents from 20 to 30 ng per oocyte or embryo based on measurement of groups of oocytes and embryos [1921]. Thus, the amounts of protein indicated in our present report should be considered to be 50–80% of the directly measured values (Figs. 1, 5, 8, and 9). The protein content has been reported to be invariable or to have a tendency to decrease [19, 21]; we showed the same tendency for dry weight measurements in our previous report [4].

Characteristics of the One- and Two-Dimensional Microelectrophoretic Techniques

Because of the paucity of experimental materials and in order to enhance the sensitivity of analysis, many workers have applied two-dimensional electrophoresis to obtain autoradiographic patterns of protein synthesis in mouse oocytes and embryos. Samples of mouse oocytes or embryos ranging from 10 to 200 in number have been incubated with L-[35S]methionine to label the proteins for fluorography and electrophoresed using an O'Farrell [11] type two-dimensional gradient gel [2225] or a 10% [26, 27] or 12.5% acrylamide separating gel [28]. The latter nongradient gels were used to avoid irreproducible protein patterns due to the irregular formation of the acrylamide gradient with the aim of establishing a database (e.g., QUEST system [29]). These autoradiographic studies have well characterized the protein synthesis and accumulated a wealth of data on the patterns of protein synthesis rates in mouse embryos during preimplantation development. In contrast, we miniaturized the gradient slab gels to reduce the amount of sample needed (Figs. 1, 2, 5, 8, and 9) and could obtain two-dimensional protein patterns using 20 oocytes or embryos or even a single embryo (Fig. 8), as well as one-dimensional electrophoretic patterns for single oocytes and embryos (Fig. 1). Separated proteins were silver stained because of the high sensitivity of this staining method. In preliminary experiments, the pH range 4 to 8 for electrofocusing was used (data not shown), but since more than 80% of spots were visualized in the range pH 5 to 7, this range was used for the subsequent analyses (Fig. 5). In addition, since the numbers of visible spots were similar in electrophoreses of 20, 30, and 60 two-cell embryos, 20 oocytes or embryos were analyzed (Fig. 2). Thus, we report here for the first time the actual protein patterns synthesized and present at all developmental stages of oocytes and embryos, not the patterns of protein synthesis rates as reported in previous studies. However, the number of spots visualized was limited because of arbitrary limitation of samples used for analysis (see Figs. 5 and 8).

Protein Expression Patterns of Oocytes and Embryos

Except with respect to the protein expression patterns of cumulus cells and blastocysts, the major spots remained basically similar during preimplantation development (Fig. 2). As described in Results, many minor spots disappear upon fertilization (Figs. 1 and 2), although the total amount of protein per oocyte remains almost unchanged during this period [4]. The dramatic decrease in the number of minor spots on fertilization indicates that the abundant oogenic proteins are unlikely to continue to decline for a long period in embryos after fertilization. However, the possibility should be considered that some protein spots may contain, in part, products from a few stages immediately before the analyzed stage. The distribution of major and minor spots is evidently different in blastocysts, representing the differentiation of blastomeres to the trophectoderm and inner cell mass (Fig. 2). The major and minor spot patterns of embryos from the 1-cell to the morula stage (Figs. 2 and 5) differed completely from the radiographic patterns of protein synthesis previously reported in gradient gels during the same developmental stages [2325]. Furthermore, the large spots corresponding to our major spots were not seen in previously reported patterns of protein synthesis in nongradient gels [2628]. Compared with the unfertilized oocyte pattern (Fig. 2), the radiographic pattern of protein synthesis in oocytes [22, 30] again differed completely from the protein spot pattern described here, and the dramatic decrease in spot number after fertilization was not detected in the pattern of protein synthesis [30]. Thus, the previous data do not appear comparable to our results.

Quantitative Analysis of Protein Spots

Although the density (gray value) of a major or minor spot is not proportional to the amount of protein in the spot, a denser spot contains a larger amount of protein (Fig. 3). Therefore, density measurement as carried out here was semiquantitative and was used for the (semi)quantitative analysis of spot density (Figs. 4, 6, and 7). Although the nature of the 8 major proteins was not clear, their densities, which remained relatively constant during preimplantation development, were successfully utilized as a basis for comparing the densities not only of major spots (Fig. 4) but also of minor spots (Figs. 6 and 7).

Although the total protein per embryo remains unchanged or shows a tendency to decrease during this period [4], the results in Figure 7 indicate that many functional proteins, which are thought to account for only a very small part of the total proteins, continue to increase in amount during preimplantation development and that their number overwhelms the number of decreasing proteins. Similarly, protein synthesis is known to increase or decrease, depending upon the autoradiographic spot, at each developmental stage [23, 2528, 31], although the total rate of protein synthesis in developing mouse embryos has been reported to decrease from the 1-cell stage to the blastocyst stage [32].

Resolution Sensitivity and Utilization of Our Ultramicroelectrophoretic Technique

As shown in Figure 8, we tested the possibility of analyzing individual oocytes or embryos. This smaller slab gel has one fourth the area of a normal microslab gel, and 5 one-cell embryos—one fourth of the usual sample of 20 embryos—were electrophoresed (Fig. 8A). Some minor spots were too small or too faintly stained to be visualized clearly by this ultra-microelectrophoresis technique, but the major spots could be identified as in the normal microslab gel (see Figs. 2 and 5). Even a single 1-cell embryo showed clear major spots and some faintly stained minor spots. Thus, the detection capacity of silver staining seems insufficient for a single oocyte or embryo or a small number of oocytes and embryos.

Preliminary Results of Immunostaining for GLUT1 Expressed in Mouse Morulae

Application of our microelectrophoresis to GLUT1 immunoblotting was attempted, and unexpected results were obtained (Fig. 9). The blotting pattern for morulae could not be superposed on any defined silver-stained spots and the unstained area was also immunostained (see Fig. 2), since the sensitivity of immunostaining is markedly higher than that of silver staining. Similar patterns were obtained in embryos at the 2-cell and blastocyst stages (data not shown). The two-dimensional immunoblot pattern of human erythrocyte membrane ghosts has been reported to show a broad band like a smear from 45 kDa to 60 kDa with a peak at 54 kDa [3336] and between pI 6 and 8 [3436]. Figure 9 indicates a similar band in a similar molecular weight range and similar pI range with a peak at pI 6.6. In contrast, GLUT1 patterns of morulae consist of two groups at the pI peaks 6.6 and 6.4, and each group contains a few or more oligomeric aggregates. Two heterogenous glucose transporters, characterized later as GLUT 4 isoform ([3]), were found at pIs 6.4 and 5.6 in rat adipocytes. Both isoforms were present in low-density microsomes, and the 5.6 isoform was thought to be translocated by insulin to the plasma membranes, where only the pI 5.6 isoform was detected [37]. In addition, the erythrocyte GLUT1, although its pure form was basic (pI 8.5), is known to be electrofocused in the range of pI 6 to 7 as a result of comigration with acidic proteins (e.g., anion exchanger and other proteins) and also to have a tendency to self-associate to form protein-lipid aggregates [36, 38]. In view of these previous reports, the immunoblot patterns in Figure 9 imply the presence of two heterogeneous GLUT1 isoforms in mouse embryos and the aggregating properties of both isoforms (detailed results on GLUT1 expression to be published elsewhere). As shown here, the present microelectrophoresis techniques will be useful not only for immunoblotting, but also for analyzing the primary structures of spotted nanogram-level proteins [39] as a tool for proteome research [40, 41].


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Nobuo Inoue for useful discussion.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported in part by Research Grants from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan (Nos. 07458206 and 08878148), and from Yokohama City for the Promotion of Research at Yokohama City University. Back

2 Correspondence: Takahiko Kato, Department of Biochemistry I, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Fukuura, Kanazawaku, Yokohama 236-0004, Japan. FAX: 81 45 784 4530; katomdpr{at}med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp Back

Accepted: January 19, 1999.

Received: September 22, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Johnson MH. The molecular and cellular basis of preimplantation mouse development. Biol Rev 1981; 56:463–498.[Medline]
  2. Pedersen RA. Potency, lineage, and allocation in preimplantation mouse embryos. In: Rossant J, Pedersen RA (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Mammalian Embryonic Development. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Sydney: Cambridge Univ Press; 1986: 3–34.
  3. Mueckler M. Facilitative glucose transporters. Eur J Biochem 1994; 219:713–725.[Medline]
  4. Saito T, Hiroi M, Kato T. Development of glucose utilization studied in single oocytes and preimplantation embryos from mice. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:266–270.[Abstract]
  5. Steck TL, Kant JA. Preparation of impermeable ghosts and inside-out vesicles from human erythrocyte membranes. In: Fleischer S, Packer L (eds.), Methods Enzymol, Vol. 31. New York, San Francisco, London: Academic Press; 1974: 172–180.
  6. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193:265–275.[Free Full Text]
  7. Manabe T, Hayama E, Okuyama T. Microscale multisample two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins in human serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine. Clin Chem 1982; 28:824–827.[Abstract]
  8. Morita Y, Tutsumi O, Hosoya I, Taketani Y, Oka Y, Kato T. Expression and possible function of glucose transporter protein GLUT1 during preimplantation mouse development from oocytes to blastocysts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1992; 188:8–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Manabe T, Visvikis S, Steinmetz J, Galteau MM, Okuyama T, Siest G. Systematic analysis of serum lipoproteins and apolipoproteins by a combined technique of micro two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 1987; 8:325–330.[CrossRef]
  11. O'Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 1975; 250:4007–4021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Winer BJ. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1971: 431–445.
  13. Fairbanks G, Steck TL, Wallach DFH. Electrophoretic analysis of the major polypeptides of the human erythrocyte membrane. Biochemistry 1971; 10:2606–2617.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Knüfermann H, Bhakdi S, Hoelzl Wallach DF. Rapid preparative isolation of major erythrocyte membrane proteins using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in sodium dodecylsulfate. Biochim Biophys Acta 1975; 389:464–476.[Medline]
  15. Marchesi VT, Furthmayr H, Tomita M. The red cell membrane. Annu Rev Biochem 1976; 45:667–698.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Lux SE. Dissecting the red cell membrane skeleton. Nature 1979; 281:426–429.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Lowry OH. The quantitative histochemistry of the brain. J Histochem Cytochem 1953; 1:420–428.[Abstract]
  18. Barbehenn EK, Wales RG, Lowry OH. The explanation for the blockade of glycolysis in early mouse embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1974; 71:1056–1060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Brinster RL. Protein content of the mouse embryo during the first five days of development. J Reprod Fertil 1967; 13:413–420.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Weitlauf HM. Changes in the protein content of blastocysts from normal and delayed implanting mice. Anat Rec 1973; 176:121–124.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Schiffner J, Spielmann H. Fluorometric assay of the protein content of mouse and rat embryos during preimplantation development. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 47:145–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Schultz RM, Wassarman PM. Specific changes in the pattern of protein synthesis during meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:538–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Levinson J, Goodfellow P, Vadeboncoeur M, McDevitt H. Identification of stage-specific polypeptides synthesized during murine preimplantation development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:3332–3336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Braude P, Pehlham H, Flach G, Lobatto R. Post-translational control in the early mouse embryo. Nature 1979; 282:102–105.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Conover JC, Temeles GL, Zimmermann JW, Burke B, Schultz RM. Stage-specific expression of a family of proteins that are major products of zygotic gene activation in the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 1991; 144:392–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Latham KE, Garrels JI, Chang C, Solter D. Quantitative analysis of protein synthesis in mouse embryos. I. Extensive reprogramming at the one- and two-cell stages. Development 1991; 112:921–932.[Abstract]
  27. Shi CZ, Collins HW, Garside WT, Buettger CW, Matschinsky FM, Heyner S. Protein databases for compacted eight-cell and blastocyst-stage mouse embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 37:34–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Cullen BR, Emigholz K, Monahan JJ. Protein patterns of early mouse embryos during development. Differentiation 1980; 17:151–160.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Garrels JI. The QUEST system for quantitative analysis of two-dimensional gels. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:5269–5282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Schultz RM, Letourneau GE, Wassarman PM. Program of early development in the mammal: changes in patterns and absolute rates of tubulin and total protein synthesis during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol 1979; 68:341–359.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Abreu SL, Brinster RL. Synthesis of tubulin and actin during the preimplantation development of the mouse. Exp Cell Res 1978; 114:135–141.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Brinster RL, Wiebold JL, Brunner S. Protein metabolism in preimplantation mouse ova. Dev Biol 1976; 51:215–224.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Carter-Su C, Pessin JE, Mora R, Gitomer W, Czech MP. Photoaffinity labeling of the human erythrocyte D-glucose transporter. J Biol Chem 1982; 257:5419–5425.[Free Full Text]
  34. Matthaei S, Baly DL, Horuk R. Rapid and effective transfer of integral membrane proteins from isoelectric focusing gels to nitrocellulose membranes. Anal Biochem 1986; 157:123–128.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Lundahl P, Greijer E, Cardell S, Mascher E, Anderson L. Improved preparation of the integral membrane proteins of human red cells, with special reference to the glucose transporter. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986; 855:345–356.[Medline]
  36. Englund A-K, Lundahl P. The isoelectric point of the human red cell glucose transporter. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991; 1065:185–194.[Medline]
  37. Horuk R, Matthaei S, Olefsky JM, Baly DL, Cushman SW, Simpson IA. Biochemical and functional heterogeneity of rat adipocyte glucose transporters. J Biol Chem 1986; 261:1823–1828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Englund A-K, Lundahl P. Isoelectric focusing in immobilized pH gradients of the glucose transporter from human red ell membranes. Electrophoresis 1993; 14:1307–1311.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Wilm M, Shevchenko A, Houthaeve T, Breit S, Schweigerer L, Fotsis T, Mann M. Fentomole sequencing of proteins from polyacrylamide gels by nano-electrospray mass spectrometry. Nature 1996; 379:466–469.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Nowak R. Entering the postgenome era. Science 1995; 270:368–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Yates III JR. Mass spectrometry and the age of the proteome. J Mass Spectrom 1998; 33:1–19.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Susor, Z. Ellederova, L. Jelinkova, P. Halada, D. Kavan, M. Kubelka, and H. Kovarova
Proteomic analysis of porcine oocytes during in vitro maturation reveals essential role for the ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1
Reproduction, October 1, 2007; 134(4): 559 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. Lalitkumar, J Sengupta, and D Ghosh
Endometrial tumor necrosis factor {alpha} (TNF{alpha}) is a likely mediator of early luteal phase mifepristone-mediated negative effector action on the preimplantation embryo
Reproduction, March 1, 2005; 129(3): 323 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Z. Ellederova, P. Halada, P. Man, M. Kubelka, J. Motlik, and H. Kovarova
Protein Patterns of Pig Oocytes During In Vitro Maturation
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2004; 71(5): 1533 - 1539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. F.C. Chow, K.-F. Lee, S. T.H. Chan, and W. S.B. Yeung
Quantification of transforming growth factor {beta}1 (TGF{beta}1) mRNA expression in mouse preimplantation embryos and determination of TGF{beta} receptor (type I and type II) expression in mouse embryos and reproductive tract
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 7(11): 1047 - 1056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Turkay Korgun, R. Demir, A. Hammer, G. Dohr, G. Desoye, G. Skofitsch, and T. Hahn
Glucose Transporter Expression in Rat Embryo and Uterus During Decidualization, Implantation, and Early Postimplantation
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1364 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. A. Brewis
Proteomics in reproductive research: The potential importance of proteomics to research in reproduction
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 2927 - 2929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sasaki, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kato, T.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS