Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.
Biology of Reproduction 60, 1453-1461 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Growth Factor Modulation of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein and Luteinization in the Pig Ovary1

Nazario Pescadora, Douglas M. Stoccob, and Bruce D. Murphy2,a

a Centre de recherche en reproduction animale, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Québec, Canada J2S 7C6 b Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas 79430


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In vivo and in vitro luteinization were investigated in the porcine ovary, with emphasis on expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR). StAR mRNA and protein as well as cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage mRNA (P450scc) increased during the luteal phase in the corpus luteum (CL) and were absent in regressed CL. Cytochrome P450 aromatase mRNA (P450arom) was not detectable at any time in CL. In vitro luteinization of granulosa cells occurred over 96 h in culture, during which P450arom mRNA was present at 1 h after cell isolation but not detectable at 6 h; and P450scc and StAR mRNAs were first detectable at 6 h and 48 h, respectively. Incubation of cultures with insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I, 10 ng/ml), dibutyryl cAMP (cAMP, 300 µM), or their combination, induced measurable StAR mRNA at 24 h (p < 0.05), increased progesterone accumulation at 48 h, and elevated both StAR and P450scc expression through 96 h. Incubation of luteinized granulosa cells with epidermal growth factor (EGF, 10 nM) changed their phenotype from epithelioid to fibroblastic, eliminated steady-state StAR expression, and interfered with cAMP induction of StAR mRNA and progesterone accumulation. EGF had little apparent effect on P450scc mRNA abundance. It is concluded that StAR expression characterizes luteinization, and early luteinization is induced by cAMP and IGF-I in vitro. Further, EGF induces a morphological and functional phenotype that appears similar to an earlier stage of granulosa cell function.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The lengthy process of differentiation of ovarian follicular cells begins with their initial recruitment, from the ovarian stroma, by factors presumed to arise from the oocyte. The penultimate stage in follicular differentiation is luteinization, which is normally triggered by the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. It engenders a remarkable phenotypic remodeling of the ovary [1]. The most striking functional change is the shift from androgen and estrogen production to the large-scale synthesis of progesterone [2]. This requires that the granulosa cells, which transform androgens from the theca into estrogens, acquire the competence for the entire process of progesterone synthesis, i.e., the capability to employ cholesterol as substrate. While the molecular mechanisms of luteinization have not been entirely determined, it is known that there are coincidental alterations in expression of the genes coding for steroidogenic enzymes. In particular, there is down-regulation of androgen synthetic cytochrome P45017{alpha} hydroxylase [3] and up-regulation of the progesterone synthetic enzymes, cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc, [3, 4]) and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase [5]. The loss of estrogen synthesis by granulosa cells coincides with loss of expression of cytochrome P450 aromatase (P450arom [6]).

The mobilization and delivery of cholesterol to the mitochondria is ligand-dependent in ovarian steroidogenic cells. A key step in the process is the transport of cholesterol from intracellular stores to the inner mitochondrial membrane, where it transformed to pregnenolone by P450scc. A protein that effects this transfer, steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR), was identified in 1994 [7]. Its significance to steroidogenesis can be seen in the profound disruptions of gonadal and adrenal differentiation and of adrenocortical function that ensue when the StAR gene is mutated in humans [8] or in mice [9]. A role for StAR in luteinization can be inferred from its appearance in porcine follicles after the administration of ovulatory doses of gonadotropic hormone [4] and from the pattern of its expression in the corpus luteum (CL) during the bovine luteal phase [10]. In luteinized porcine granulosa cells, StAR expression is stimulated by FSH and cAMP, depends on ongoing protein synthesis, and is inhibited by phorbol 12 myristate 13-acetate (PMA [11]).

Growth factors have marked effects on the function of mammalian granulosa cells [12]. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) is a potent mitogen in pig granulosa cells in vitro [13, 14] and appears to be locally synthesized in the pig ovarian follicle [15]. Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) expression can likewise be localized to the theca, stroma, and CL of the rat ovary [16] and has pleiotropic effects on ovarian cells. It interacts with gonadotropins in support of developing follicles in the bovine and ovine ovaries (reviewed in [17]). In the porcine ovary, IGF-I stimulates both proliferation and differentiation, usually in combination with FSH (for review, see [18]). In porcine granulosa cells in culture, IGF-I stimulates the activity of P450scc and P450arom [19] and acts in synergy with FSH in the induction of StAR gene expression [20].

As noted above, luteinization is a large-scale remodeling process that occurs in response to gonadotropin stimulation. Paracrine growth factors modulate both differentiation and proliferation, processes that appear to be mutually exclusive in luteinizing granulosa cells. The present experiments were conceived to test the hypothesis that EGF and IGF-I modulate luteinization in porcine granulosa cells, as indicated by the acquisition of the capacity to employ cholesterol for progesterone synthesis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Culture and Tissue Collection

Porcine ovaries from adult and prepubertal gilts were collected from an abattoir. For determination of the variation in StAR expression associated with luteinization in vivo, CL were collected from one ovary each of cycling adult pigs at various stages of the estrous cycle. CL were placed in four categories corresponding to the stages of the luteal phase according to morphological criteria [21]: I, early; II, early midcycle; III, late midcycle; and R, regressed. Classification was confirmed by histological comparison of representative CL from the abattoir with CL taken from pigs slaughtered at known intervals after observed estrus. Three to five CL from each stage were collected for Northern and Western analysis. In the remainder of the experiments, granulosa cells, obtained by aspiration from medium-sized (3–5 mm) follicles from immature pigs, were employed. An aliquot of 3 x 106 viable cells was plated in 6-well plastic culture dishes in minimal essential medium (MEM; Gibco BRL, Burlington ON, Canada) containing 4.8 g/L Hepes (Gibco BRL), 2.2 g/L sodium bicarbonate (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis MO), 1 mg/L insulin (Sigma), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Gibco BRL), 5 x 104 IU/L penicillin (Gibco BRL), 0.5 mg/L fungizone (Gibco BRL), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco BRL). Incubations were carried out at 37°C in 95% humidified air with 5% CO2.

Experiments

The first experiment was conducted to determine the characteristics of in vitro luteinization of granulosa cells. Granulosa cells were treated with either dibutyryl cAMP (cAMP, 300 µM; Sigma) or medium alone, and cultures were terminated at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h. The cAMP dose was based on optimal stimulation of steroidogenic proteins in previous studies [11]. In the second trial, the effects of human IGF-I were assessed by incubating freshly isolated cells with 0, 1, 10, or 100 ng/ml human IGF-I (Gibco BRL), with cultures terminated at 24 or 48 h after initiation of treatment. In subsequent trials, the effects of cAMP (300 µM) and IGF-I (10 ng/ml) on the expression of factors associated with luteinization were assessed over 96 h from the time of isolation of cells. Cultures were terminated at 12, 24, 48, 72, or 96 h. As in previous studies [11], cells were incubated with FBS for the first 48 h and were serum-free for the final 48 h of culture. Subsequent trials were conducted in the luteinized cells that had been cultured for 96 h. These cells were treated with medium alone, cAMP (300 µM), or EGF (10 nM; Sigma), and incubated for a further 0, 12, 18, or 30 h.

RNA Analysis

CL and cultured cells were homogenized in 4 M guanidine isothiocyanate (Gibco BRL), 2.6 mM sodium acetate (Sigma), and 0.12 M fl-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), and stored at -70°C until analysis. Total RNA was purified by CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation, and aliquots of 15 µg were subjected to Northern analysis as previously described [11]. Probes were labeled with 32P to specific activity of 1.5–3.0 x 109 dpm/µg with a random primer synthesis kit (Boehringer-Mannheim, Laval, PQ, Canada). These and all remaining blots were hybridized in sequence with three probes, porcine StAR cDNA [11], P450scc cDNA [22], and 28s rRNA. Duplicate blots from all trials were hybridized with a P450arom probe corresponding to nucleotides 850–1497 of the bovine sequence [23]. To further characterize the response to EGF, representative blots were hybridized with a porcine LH receptor probe [24]. Quantitative estimates of mRNA abundance for the genes of interest were made as we have previously reported [10, 11]. For StAR, the two major positive bands on the consequent autoradiograms were scanned individually using a computer imaging system. The areas under the resultant curves were summed and integrated by means of the Macintosh program Collage (Fotodyne Inc., New Berlin, WI). The single P450scc, P450arom, and 28s bands were likewise scanned, and the latter served as control for loading and transfer of RNA.

Western Blots

CL from each of the four stages of the luteal phase described above were homogenized in 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris, and 0.1 mM EDTA. The mitochondrial fraction was isolated by centrifugation [10], and the protein content was assayed by the Lowry method [25]. Western immunoblotting was performed as previously described [10]. Membranes bearing electrophoretically separated proteins were incubated with primary antibodies specific to StAR [7]. The second antibody, donkey anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, was added in the presence of the blocking agent. The signal was detected by chemiluminescence as previously described [7], and the optical density of the immunospecific bands was quantitated by means of a BioImage (Ann Arbor, MI) Visage 2000 computer-assisted analysis system.

Morphological Observations

Cells were examined under phase contrast microscopy at 24-h intervals from the time of their isolation through 96 h. Cells were also observed at 6, 12, and 24 h after treatment with EGF. Photomicrographs of representative fields were taken.

Progesterone Assay

Culture medium samples taken at 48 h in the luteinization experiment and at all times following EGF treatment were subjected to dilution and RIA as previously described [26]. The intraassay coefficient of variation, calculated between duplicate samples, was 9% or less, and the interassay value, calculated from four samples present in all assays, ranged from 5% to 11%.

Statistical Analysis

Northern blot data, comprising the ratio of optical density values for the mRNA in question to that of 28s, and progesterone concentrations in culture medium were evaluated in three or four independent replicates of each experiment, each initiated on different days, in different pools of cells. For statistical analysis, Shapiro's test was employed to determine normality of distribution of optical density data, and when normality was absent, data were logarithmically transformed before analysis. Homogeneity of variance was confirmed for each experiment by Bartlett's test, and statistical significance was evaluated by ANOVA. In the presence of a significant overall F value, preplanned comparisons between treatments and controls were made by the least-significant-difference method. The relation of StAR mRNA to its protein abundance was determined by correlation analysis. The level of probability accepted as statistically significant was p < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Luteinization In Vivo

The abundance of mRNA coding for both StAR and P450scc, depicted in Figure 1, varied during the luteal phase in CL (p < 0.05). Both were detectable in the earliest CL recovered, and their levels were elevated during the later part of the midluteal phase (p < 0.05). No message for either gene was detectable in regressed CL. StAR protein was also detected in the earliest CL collected. Mean protein abundance was 3- to 4-fold greater during the midluteal phase (p < 0.05), and no protein was detectable in Western blots from regressed CL (Fig. 1, inset). StAR message and StAR protein were correlated (r = 0.79, p < 0.03). P450arom mRNA was not detectable in any CL samples.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Northern and Western analysis of porcine CL taken from stages of the estrous cycle. In this and subsequent figures, Northern blots were hybridized in sequence with the 0.85-kilobase (kb) porcine StAR cDNA probe, the 1.0-kb porcine P450scc probe, and the 1.4-kb fragment from the internal region of the 28S ribosomal RNA gene. The upper panel is a representative Northern blot, while the lower panel presents the results of densitometric analysis of Northern blots for 3 to 5 CL from different ovaries taken at stages of the estrous cycle. RNA density values are the mean ± SEM of the ratio between StAR or P450scc mRNA abundance and the 28S value, which served as a control for loading. The inset on the lower panel depicts the mean ± SEM optical density of Western blots of 50 µg mitochondrial protein from 3 CL from each stage of the estrous cycle. * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 compared to CLI.

Luteinization In Vitro

At isolation from porcine follicles, granulosa cells contained P450arom mRNA, while both StAR and P450scc mRNA was undetectable. Stimulation of these cells for 1 h with 300 µM cAMP resulted in up to 5-fold increases in the message coding for P450arom (p < 0.05; Fig. 2). By 6 h after isolation, both steady-state and cAMP-stimulated P450arom message were barely present, while P450scc mRNA had begun to appear. At 12 and 24 h, the P450arom message had disappeared, and it could not be found at any time thereafter through 120 h after cell isolation. The first cAMP induction of P450scc, 1.6-fold, was present at 6 h after the beginning of culture. Transcript abundance had increased to 4.5-fold at 12 h (Fig. 2).



View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Northern blot demonstrating the variation in P450arom and P450scc during the first 24 h after isolation of porcine granulosa cells from 3- to 5-mm follicles. Cells were plated in 10% serum and incubated in medium (C) or in medium containing cAMP (300 µM, T) for periods from 6–24 h. This blot is representative of four replicates of the experiment. Densitometric and statistical analyses indicated that the 1-h P450arom differed from that at all other times (p < 0.02). Likewise the P450scc value was greater than the 1-h value at 12 and 24 h (p < 0.05).

Cells underwent progressive morphological changes consistent with luteinization (Fig. 3). At 24 h after plating, the cultures were not yet confluent, and cells were found in clumps, with most maintaining the rounded shape present at isolation, and a few displaying cytoplasmic projections (Fig. 3A). By 48 h, large scale remodeling had occurred, confluence had been achieved, round cells had become rare, and a flattened, epithelial form was the most common phenotype. By 72 h, virtually all of the cells had attained the epithelial form, and by 96 h, an epithelial, block-like form was the most common phenotype (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Morphological changes associated with luteinization of pig granulosa cells. Cultures were incubated for 48 h with 10% FBS and 48 h under serum-free conditions. The photos presented are of representative fields of culture wells at 24 (A) and 96 h (B) after plating, taken under phase contrast microscopy. The bar represents 100 µM.

StAR mRNA was not detected in control cultures until 48 h after plating (Fig. 4), whereas P450scc mRNA, first observed at 6 h, was found to be continuously present through 96 h of culture (Fig. 5). Incubation with 300 µM cAMP hastened the appearance of the message coding for StAR by at least 24 h. The same dose of cAMP significantly elevated both StAR and P450scc message abundance at every time evaluated, from 24 to 96 h of culture (Figs. 4 and 5, p < 0.01). IGF-I (10 ng/ml) also induced precocious occurrence of StAR message relative to control cultures, as evidenced by a detectable signal that was present at 24 h. The effects of IGF-I on StAR mRNA were not dose-dependent, as responses of the same magnitude were present at 1, 10, and 100 ng/ml (data not shown), nor were the effects of cAMP and IGF-I additive (Fig. 4). IGF-I also increased P450scc message abundance at 24 and 96 h (p < 0.05), with a tendency toward increase at 48 and 72 h (p = 0.08; Fig. 5). As above, the effects of IGF-I on the P450scc message were not dose-dependent within the range of 1–100 ng/ml (data not shown). At 48 h, progesterone accumulation in medium was greater in cultures treated with cAMP, IGF-I, and cAMP+IGF-I relative to controls (p < 0.01; Fig. 6). IGF-I had no apparent effect on the disappearance of P450arom that occurred with luteinization (data not shown).



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Northern blot showing evolution of the presence of StAR mRNA during the process of luteinization of granulosa cells. Cells designated control received medium alone (48 h with 10% FBS, 48 h serum-free), while other cultures were continuously treated with the dibutryl analogue of cAMP (300 µM), IGF-I (10 ng/ml), or the combination of these doses of cAMP and IGF-I. The lower panels depict the effects of treatments (mean ± SEM) on StAR abundance based on densitometric ratios as described in the legend to Figure 1. Asterisks indicate treatments significantly different (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01) from control for each time period.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Northern blot showing changes in P450scc mRNA abundance during the process of luteinization of granulosa cells. Cells designated control received medium alone (48 h with 10% FBS, 48 h serum-free), while other cultures were continuously treated with cAMP (300 µM), IGF-I (10 ng/ml), or the combination of these doses of cAMP and IGF-I. The lower panels depict the effects of treatments (mean ± SEM) on P450scc transcripts based on densitometric ratios as described in the legend to Figure 1. Asterisks indicate treatments significantly different (*p < 0.05) from control for each time period.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Progesterone accumulation in cultures terminated at 48 h after incubation in medium alone (control), cAMP (300 µM), IGF-I (10 ng/ml), or the combination of these doses of cAMP and IGF-I. All treatments resulted in values greater than control (p < 0.01).

Effects of EGF on Luteinized Cells

EGF induced remarkable changes in the luteinized epithelioid phenotype (Fig. 7A). Within 6 h, the first signs of morphological change, the lengthening of the cytoplasmic processes, were evident. By 12 h, cells with the flattened epithelial phenotype had been largely replaced by star-shaped cells with multiple thin projections (Fig. 7B). By 18 h and 24 h, these cells were present in clumps, and the projections had further thinned.



View larger version (167K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Morphological changes induced by treatment of luteinized granulosa cells with 10 nM EGF. Cells were fixed in methanol and viewed under phase contrast microscopy. A) Control culture; B) a representative field from an EGF-treated culture at 12 h after initiation of the experiment. The bar indicates 100 µM.

Equally profound changes in gene expression followed EGF treatment of luteinized granulosa cells (Fig. 8). StAR mRNA, present in low abundance at the initiation of treatment, was reduced to the limit of detection at 6 h. Steady-state P450scc message was elevated from 6 to 18 h relative to pretreatment controls (p < 0.05). In EGF-treated cells, mean P450scc mRNA was also higher from 6 to 18 h relative to pretreatment controls (p < 0.05), but was not significantly elevated relative to contemporary control values. StAR and P450scc messages were increased by incubation with cAMP, with changes from 12- to 35-fold for StAR and from 7- to 20-fold for P450scc (p < 0.001). EGF eliminated the StAR response to cAMP at 6 and 12 h and appeared to attenuate it at 18 and 30 h. Progesterone accumulation in culture medium was elevated from 12 to 30 h by cAMP (p < 0.02) but remained unchanged relative to control in EGF- and EGF+cAMP-treated cultures (Fig. 9). LH receptor mRNA was probed for comparison, and it was progressively reduced by EGF treatment, with significant reduction at 6 h and virtual elimination of the message by 24 h (Fig. 10). No P450arom expression could be documented, either before or after EGF treatment of the cultures (data not shown).



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Changes in abundance of StAR and P450scc mRNA in luteinized granulosa cells induced by treatment with EGF. Luteinized cells (96 h after plating) were treated with medium alone (Control), 10 nM EGF (EGF), 300 µM cAMP (cAMP), or the combination of these two agents at the same doses (cAMP+EGF). A) Northern blot of a representative experiment. B) Mean (± SEM) of the densitometric ratios for StAR and P450scc abundance over the 30 h of the experiment from four replicates conducted on different populations of cells. Asterisks indicate means significantly different from pretreatment controls at p < 0.05.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Progesterone accumulation in cultures of porcine granulosa cells treated as described in Figure 8. There were no differences between control cultures and those treated with EGF or EGF+cAMP. Cultures treated with 300 µM cAMP (cAMP) had significantly greater accumulation of progesterone from 12 to 30 h after initiation of the experiment (p < 0.05).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. Northern blot representative of three experiments in which EGF (10 nM) induced reduction of mRNA for the porcine LH receptor in luteinized cells. Luteinized cells (96 h after plating) were treated with either EGF (T) or medium alone (C), and cultures were terminated at 0, 1, 6, 12, and 24 h.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Vivo Luteinization

StAR transcripts and protein varied in the CL throughout the estrous cycle in mature pigs, with maximum expression during the mid to late luteal phase and no detectable signal in regressed CL. The pattern of StAR mRNA concurs with that observed by LaVoie et al. [4] in the CL of gilts induced to ovulate with eCG and hCG, and with our previous results in the bovine CL [10]. StAR protein is correlated with transcript abundance in the pig, indicating coupling of transcription and translation, as in the bovine CL [10]. Correspondence between StAR expression and progesterone concentrations in follicular and luteal tissue [4] is consistent with its important role in the acquisition of steroidogenic capability during luteinization.

LaVoie et al. [4] demonstrated basal levels of StAR transcripts in whole follicles in unstimulated pig ovaries. We previously reported a strong presence of StAR mRNA in thecal cells from porcine follicles, but none in porcine granulosa cells [11]. It is therefore expected that the StAR is restricted to the thecal compartment in follicles.

In Vitro Luteinization

One purpose of this study was to determine how faithful the model of granulosa cell luteinization in vitro is to the development of the CL in vivo. Estrogen production and P450arom activity in granulosa cells declines rapidly after the LH surge in both in the pig [27, 28] and the cow [29, 30], and P450 aromatase gene expression is decreased by the LH surge in the rat [6]. In the present study, no P450arom mRNA could be detected in the CL from the porcine estrous cycle, and there was loss of both the steady-state and cAMP-inducible P450arom mRNA during the early stages of in vitro luteinization, within 12 h after plating of granulosa cells. Together these findings indicate that there is functional concordance between the in vitro and in vivo models.

StAR mRNA was undetectable in untreated cultures before 48 h, consistent with reports of unstimulated bovine granulosa cells [31]. This contrasts with the report of Balasubramanian et al. [20], who reported detection of steady-state StAR mRNA in porcine granulosa cells at 30 h after plating in 3% FBS. The difference may reflect their use of the ribonuclease (RNase) protection assay, expected to be more sensitive than the Northern analysis we employed. Induction of StAR by cAMP was first detectable at 24 h in the present study, similar to FSH stimulation at 30 h reported by Balasubramanian et al. [20]. In contrast to StAR, P450scc was present and cAMP-inducible as early as 6 h after plating in the present study. Progesterone accumulation in medium of porcine granulosa cells has been demonstrated as early as 24 h in this model [32]. It has been suggested that steroidogenesis can proceed in the absence of previous or concurrent StAR expression in both adrenal [33] and Leydig [34] cells. It is possible that this occurs early in the luteinization process in granulosa cells. However, it is more likely that StAR is expressed in low but sufficient abundance to allow for basal progesterone synthesis during early luteinization.

The present study clearly demonstrates that IGF-I brings about earlier expression of StAR mRNA and increased progesterone accumulation at 48 h, and thus, accelerated luteinization. The effects appear to be binomial rather than dose-dependent, as the mRNA responses were the same through a 100-fold range of IGF-I doses. The combination of IGF-I and cAMP was neither consistently additive nor synergistic. These results differ from those of Balasubramanian et al. [20], who found little direct effect of IGF-I on StAR expression, and who reported a marked synergism between IGF-I and either FSH, a ligand that employs cAMP as a second messenger, or 8-bromo-cAMP. Part of this effect may be attributed to enhanced cAMP levels in FSH-treated granulosa cells [35]. Nonetheless, there appear to be effects of IGF-I on StAR promoter activity that are downstream from cAMP stimulation of protein kinase A [35]. IGF-I mRNA is implicated in granulosa cell proliferation in the rat, while its absence is related to luteinization [36], providing a contrast to present findings in the pig. This difference may be explained by the fact that IGF-I mRNA and IGF-I protein do not colocalize in the rodent ovary [16].

The effects of EGF on luteinized granulosa cells were acute and profound. They included reduction in the abundance of the LH receptor message within 6 h and reduction to undetectable levels by 24 h. EGF has a similar inhibitory effect on hCG binding and LH receptor mRNA in pig Leydig cells [37] and in MA-10 Leydig tumor cells [38], in which the effect is reduction in transcription of the LH receptor gene [39]. StAR mRNA declined to barely detectable levels within 12 h of EGF treatment, and the ability of cAMP to stimulate StAR and progesterone accumulation was drastically compromised by EGF. The cAMP stimulation of steroidogenic enzymes is likewise neutralized by EGF in pig Leydig cells [40].

The cAMP induction of P450scc was only marginally affected by EGF, consistent with earlier reports that EGF up-regulates P450scc mRNA in porcine granulosa cells [41]. These findings indicate that EGF has differential effects on steroidogenic proteins, with stimulation or no effect on P450scc and profound down-regulation of StAR expression. Elevated cellular temperature and consequent heat shock protein synthesis have similar differential effects: StAR protein abundance is severely reduced, with little change in P450scc protein [42].

The protein kinase-C (PKC) pathway plays a role in EGF-mediated changes in porcine granulosa cells [43]. In addition, phorbal ester activation of PKC interferes with ligand-induced StAR expression [11], and PKC activation interferes with differentiation [44]. These effects may occur at the level of StAR transcription, as another growth factor, transforming growth factor-ß, down-regulates StAR gene expression in bovine adrenal cortex cells, via Smad protein regulation of its gene [45]. There are potential inhibitory elements on the StAR gene; for example, the nuclear receptor DAX-1 binds DNA and acutely down-regulates StAR transcription in MA-10 cells [46]. The mechanisms of EGF interference with StAR expression await further investigation.

Structural Changes in Granulosa Cells during Luteinization and after EGF Treatment

At isolation, granulosa cells are round, and at attachment, they take a fibroblastic form. After 72 h in culture, they have a blocky appearance, often described as epithelioid. These changes are accompanied by, and may be due to, rearrangement of junctional elements and concurrent reorganization of the cytoskeleton [47, 48]. Phenotypic remodeling is an essential element of luteinization, believed to be necessary for maximal progesterone synthesis [47]. The morphological changes induced by EGF, especially the establishment of long cytoplasmic processes, are suggestive of a return to the fibroblastic form and the involvement of the cytoskeleton. Similar morphology was documented by Hatey et al. [44] in phorbol ester-treated pig granulosa cells, implicating the PKC pathway and EGF in structural modification of granulosa cells. A mechanism for EGF-induced cytoskeletal remodeling can be found in the presence of an actin binding domain on the EGF receptor [49].

In summary, the present investigation demonstrates that in pig ovarian tissues, the onset of StAR and the loss of P450arom gene expression accompany luteinization in vivo and in vitro. The acquisition of StAR can be precociously induced by addition of IGF-I to pig granulosa cell cultures. EGF causes structural changes in luteinized granulosa cells and eliminates the steady-state levels of StAR and LH receptor mRNA, with no effect on P450scc. Together these results suggest the IGF-I enhances, and EGF reverses, the process of luteinization.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Mira Dobias for excellent technical assistance and Tao-Yan Men for RT-PCR cloning of the pig StAR cDNA, Dr. T.H. Wise for the P450scc probe, Dr. C.A. Price for the p450arom probe and critical review of the manuscript, and Dr. A.K. Goff for progesterone antiserum.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by MRC Canada Grant MT 11018 to B.D.M. and NIH HD 17481 to D.M.S. N.P. is recipient of a graduate fellowship from CONACYT, Mexico, and is on leave from Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca, México. Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 450 778 8103; murphyb{at}medvet.umontreal.ca Back

Accepted: January 20, 1999.

Received: July 28, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Richards JS. Hormonal control of gene expression in the ovary. Endocr Rev 1994; 15:725–751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Smith MF, McIntush EW, Smith GW. Mechanism associated with corpus luteum development. J Anim Sci 1994; 72:1857–1872.[Abstract]
  3. Voss AK, Fortune JE. Levels of messenger-ribonucleic-acid for cytochrome-P450 17-alpha-hydroxylase and p450 aromatase in preovulatory bovine follicles decrease after the luteinizing-hormone surge. Endocrinology 1993; 132:2239–2245.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. LaVoie HA, Benoit AM, Garmey JC, Dailey RA, Wright DJ, Veldhuis JD. Coordinate developmental expression of genes regulating sterol economy and cholesterol side-chain cleavage in the porcine ovary. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:402–407.[Abstract]
  5. Juengel JL, Guy MK, Tandeski TR, McGuire WJ, Niswender GD. Steady-state concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage and 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/{Delta}5,{Delta}4 isomerase in ovine corpora lutea during the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 1994; 51:380–384.[Abstract]
  6. Fitzpatrick SL, Carlone DL, Robker RL, Richards JS. Expression of aromatase in the ovary: down-regulation of mRNA by the ovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Steroids 1997; 62:197–206.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Clark BJ, Wells J, King SR, Stocco DM. The purification, cloning and expression of a novel luteinizing hormone-induced mitochondrial protein in MA-10 mouse Leydig tumor cells. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:28314–28322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Lin D, Sugawara T, Strauss JF, Clark BJ, Stocco DM, Saenger P, Rogol A, Miller WL. Role of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis. Science 1995; 267:1828–1831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Caron KM, Soo S-C, Wetsel WC, Stocco DM, Clark BJ, Parker KL. Targeted disruption of the mouse gene encoding steroidogenic acute regulatory protein provides insights into congenital lipoid adrenal hyperplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:11540–11545.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pescador N, Soumano K, Stocco DM, Price CA, Murphy BD. Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein in bovine corpora lutea. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:485–491.[Abstract]
  11. Pescador N, Houde A, Stocco DM, Murphy BD. Follicle-stimulating hormone and intracellular second messengers regulate steroidogenic acute regulatory protein messenger ribonucleic acids in luteinized porcine granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:660–668.[Abstract]
  12. Gospodarowicz D, Ill CR, Birdwell CR. Effects of fibroblast and epidermal growth factors on ovarian cell proliferation in vitro. I. Characterization of the response of granulosa cells to FGF and EGF. Endocrinology 1977; 100:1108–1120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Gospodarowicz D, Bialecki H. Fibroblast and epidermal growth factors are mitogenic agents for cultured granulosa cells of rodent, porcine and human origin. Endocrinology 1979; 104:757–764.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. May JV, Frost JP, Schomberg DW. Differential effects of epidermal growth factor, somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I, and transforming growth factor-ß on porcine granulosa cell deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis and cell proliferation. Endocrinology 1988; 123:168–179.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Singh B, Rutledge JM, Armstrong DT. Epidermal growth factor and its receptor gene expression and peptide localization in porcine ovarian follicles. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40:391–399.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Goubau S, Murphy BD, Han VKM, Schultz GA. Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) colocalizes with IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) in mouse and rat ovary. Endocrine 1996; 4:231–221.
  17. Monniaux D, Huet C, Besnard N, Clement F, Bosc M, Pisselet C, Monget P, Mariana JC. Follicular growth and ovarian dynamics in mammals. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997; 51:3–23.[Medline]
  18. Guidice LC. Insulin-like growth factors and ovarian follicular development. Endocr Rev 1992; 13:641–669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Veldhuis JD, Furlanetto RW, Juchter D, Garmey J, Veldhuis P. Trophic actions of human somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I on ovarian cells: in vitro studies with swine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1985; 116:1235–1242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Balasubramanian K, Lavoie HA, Garmey JC, Stocco DM, Veldhuis JD. Regulation of porcine granulosa cell steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) by insulin-like growth factor I: synergism with follicle-stimulating hormone or protein kinase A agonist. Endocrinology 1997; 138:433–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Akins EL, Morrissette MC. Gross ovarian changes during the estrous cycle of swine. Am J Vet Res 1968; 29:1953–1957.[Medline]
  22. Mulheron GW, Stone RT, Miller WL, Wise T. Nucleotide sequence of cytochrome P450 cholesterol side chain cleavage cDNA isolated from porcine testis. Nucleic Acid Res 1989; 17:1773.[Free Full Text]
  23. Soumano K, Silversides DW, Doizé F, Price CA. Follicular 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and cytochromes P450 17{alpha}-hydroxylase and aromatase messenger ribonucleic acids in cattle undergoing superovulation. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:1419–1426.[Abstract]
  24. Sites CK, Patterson K, Jamison CS, Friezner-Degen SJ, LaBarbera AR. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) increased FSH receptor messenger ribonucleic acid while decreasing FSH binding in cultured porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1994; 134:411–417.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NV, Farr AL, Randall LJ. Protein measurements with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193:265–275.[Free Full Text]
  26. Douglas DA, Song JH, Moreau GM, Murphy BD. Differentiation of the corpus luteum of the mink (Mustela vison: mitogenic and steroidogenic potential of luteal cells from embryonic diapause and postimplantation gestation. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1163–11699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ainsworth L, Tsang BK, Downey BR, Marcus GJ, Armstrong DT. Interrelationships between follicular fluid steroid levels, gonadotropic stimuli, and oocyte maturation during preovulatory development of porcine follicles. Biol Reprod 1980; 23:621–627.[Abstract]
  28. Kettelberger DM, Hoover D, Anderson L. Loss of aromatase activity in porcine granulosa cells during spontaneous luteinization in vitro. In: 19th annual meeting for the Society for the Study of Reproduction; Ithaca, NY; 1986. Abstract 160.
  29. Dieleman SJ, Blankenstein DM. Changes in estrogen synthesizing ability of bovine follicles relative to the peak of LH. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 72:487–494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Henderson KM, Moon YS. Luteinization of bovine granulosa cells and corpus luteum formation associated with loss of androgen-aromatizing ability. J Reprod Fertil 1979; 56:89–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Hartung S, Rust W, Balvers M, Ivell R. Molecular cloning and in vivo expression of the bovine steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995; 215:646–653.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Murphy BD. Down-regulation of FSH receptor mRNA in luteinized porcine granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1994; 50(suppl 1):133 (abstract 316).
  33. Ariyoshi N, Kim YC, Artemenko I, Bhattacharyya KK, Jefcoate CR. Characterization of the rat StAR gene that encodes the predominant 3.5-kilobase pair mRNA. ACTH stimulation of adrenal steroids in vivo precedes elevation of StAR mRNA and protein. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:7610–7619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lukyanenko YO, Carpenter AM, Brigham DE, Stocco DM, Hutson JC. The macrophage-derived stimulator of Leydig cells regulates steroidogenesis through a StAR-independent pathway. J Endocrinol 1998; 158:267–275.[Abstract]
  35. LaVoie HA, Garmey JC, Veldhuis JD. Mechanisms of insulin-like growth factor augmentation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced porcine steroidogenetic acute regulatory protein gene promoter activity in granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1999; 140:146–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zhou, J, Refuerzo J, Bondy C. Granulosa cell DNA synthesis is strictly correlates with the presence of insulin-like growth factor I and absence of c-fos/c-jun. Mol Endocrinol 1995; 9:924–931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Chuzel F, Clark AM, Avallet O, Saez JM. Transcriptional regulation of the lutropin/human choriogonadotropin receptor and three enzymes of steroidogenesis by growth factors in cultured pig Leydig cells. Eur J Biochem 1996; 239:8–16.[Medline]
  38. Wang H, Segaloff DL, Ascoli M. Epidermal growth factor and phorbol esters reduce the levels of the cognate mRNA for the LH/CG receptor. Endocrinology 1991; 128:2651–2653.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Nelson S, Ascoli M. Epidermal growth factor, a phorbol ester, and 3'5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate decreased the transcription of the luteinizing hormone/chorionic gonadotropin receptor gene in MA-10 Leydig tumor cells. Endocrinology 1992; 131:615–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Kaminski T, Akinola L, Poutanen M, Vihko R, Vihko P. Growth factors and phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate modulate the follicle-stimulating hormone and cyclic adenosine-3'5'-monophosphate-dependent regulation of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression in rat granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1997; 31:47–56.
  41. Urban RJ, Garmey JC, Shupnik MA, Veldhuis JD. Insulin-like growth factor type I increases concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in primary cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1990; 127:2481–2488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Liu Z, Stocco DM. Heat shock-induced inhibition of acute steroidogenesis in MA-10 cells is associated with inhibition of the synthesis of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein. Endocrinology 1997; 138:2722–2728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lindsell CE, Misra V, Murphy BD. Regulation of follistatin messenger ribonucleic acid in porcine granulosa cells by epidermal growth factor and the protein kinase-C pathway. Endocrinology 1993; 132:1630–1636.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hatey F, Mulsant P, Bonnet A, Benne F, Gasser F. Protein kinase C inhibition of in vitro FSH-induced differentiation in pig granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995; 107:9–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Brand C, Cherradi N, Defaye G, Chinn A, Chambaz EM, Feige J-J, Bailly S. Transforming growth factor ß decreases cholesterol supply to mitochondria via repression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein expression. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:6410–6416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Zazopoulos E, Lalli E, Stocco DM, Sassone-Corsi P. DNA binding and transcriptional repression by DAX-1 blocks steroidogenesis. Nature 1997; 390:311–315.[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Amsterdam A, Phehn-Dujowich D, Suh BS. Structure-function relationships during differentiation of normal and oncogene-transformed granulosa cells. Biol Reprod 1992; 46:513–522.[Abstract]
  48. Ben-Ze'ev A, Amsterdam A. In vitro regulation of granulosa cell differentiation. Involvement of cytoskeletal protein. J Biol Chem 1987; 262:5266–5376.
  49. van der Heyden MA, Nievers M, Verkleij AJ, Boonstra J, Van Bergenen Henegouwen PM. Identification of an intracellular domain of the EGF receptor required for high-affinity binding of EGF. FEBS Lett 1997; 410:265–268.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. M Seneda, M. Godmann, B. D Murphy, S. Kimmins, and V. Bordignon
Developmental regulation of histone H3 methylation at lysine 4 in the porcine ovary
Reproduction, June 1, 2008; 135(6): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
N. Gevry, K. Schoonjans, F. Guay, and B. D. Murphy
Cholesterol supply and SREBPs modulate transcription of the Niemann-Pick C-1 gene in steroidogenic tissues
J. Lipid Res., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 1024 - 1033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Miranda-Jimenez and B. D. Murphy
Lipoprotein receptor expression during luteinization of the ovarian follicle
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2007; 293(4): E1053 - E1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. C. Woods, M. J. Haugen, and A.L. Johnson
Actions of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Protein Kinase C Signaling in Granulosa Cells from Gallus gallus Are Dependent upon Stage of Differentiation
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 61 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Needle, K. Piparo, D. Cole, C. Worrall, I. Whitehead, G. Mahon, and L. T. Goldsmith
Protein Kinase A-Independent cAMP Stimulation of Progesterone in a Luteal Cell Model Is Tyrosine Kinase Dependent but Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Independent
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 147 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J M Silva, M Hamel, M Sahmi, and C A Price
Control of oestradiol secretion and of cytochrome P450 aromatase messenger ribonucleic acid accumulation by FSH involves different intracellular pathways in oestrogenic bovine granulosa cells in vitro.
Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 909 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. A. Lazzaro, D. Pepin, N. Pescador, B. D. Murphy, B. C. Vanderhyden, and D. J. Picketts
The Imitation Switch Protein SNF2L Regulates Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Expression during Terminal Differentiation of Ovarian Granulosa Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2006; 20(10): 2406 - 2417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Rusovici, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Inhibition of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-Stimulated StAR Gene Expression in Porcine Granulosa Cells Is Associated with Reduced Histone H3 Acetylation
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 862 - 871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Z. T. Ruiz-Cortes, Y. Martel-Kennes, N. Y. Gevry, B. R. Downey, M.-F. Palin, and B. D. Murphy
Biphasic Effects of Leptin in Porcine Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 789 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A.L. Johnson, E.V. Solovieva, and J.T. Bridgham
Relationship Between Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein Expression and Progesterone Production in Hen Granulosa Cells During Follicle Development
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1313 - 1320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Gevry, D. Lacroix, J.-H. Song, N. Pescador, M. Dobias, and B. D. Murphy
Porcine Niemann Pick-C1 Protein Is Expressed in Steroidogenic Tissues and Modulated by cAMP
Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 708 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. L. Johnson and J. T. Bridgham
Regulation of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein and Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid in Hen Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2001; 142(7): 3116 - 3124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
N. Sekar, H. A. LaVoie, and J. D. Veldhuis
Concerted Regulation of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Gene Expression by Luteinizing Hormone and Insulin (or Insulin-Like Growth Factor I) in Primary Cultures of Porcine Granulosa-Luteal Cells
Endocrinology, November 1, 2000; 141(11): 3983 - 3992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Zhang, J. C. Garmey, and J. D. Veldhuis
Interactive Stimulation by Luteinizing Hormone and Insulin of the Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory (StAR) Protein and 17{alpha}-Hydroxylase/17, 20-Lyase (CYP17) Genes in Porcine Theca Cells
Endocrinology, August 1, 2000; 141(8): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. D. Murphy
Models of Luteinization
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 2 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Pescador, N.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS