Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 326-332 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Progesterone Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Rat Decidua Basalis during Pregnancy1

Donghai Dai3,a, and Thomas F. Ogle2,a

a Department of Physiology and Endocrinology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia 30912


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Ovarian steroid hormones and epidermal growth factor (EGF) play important interactive roles in proliferation and decidualization of mesometrial stromal cells during pregnancy. This study determined the ontogeny of EGF receptor (EGF-R) expression in the decidua basalis (DB) throughout pregnancy and its regulation by estrogen and progesterone (P4). DB were isolated from rats between Days 8–21 of pregnancy and prepared for immunohistochemistry or Western analysis. In one study, rats were ovariectomized (Ovx) on Day 8 or 9 and given estradiol-17ß, P4, or both. In another study, the antiprogestin, mifepristone (RU-486), was administered on Day 9. During normal pregnancy, total EGF-R (phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms) increased from Day 8 to a maximum level on Days 10 and 12. Tyrosine-phosphorylated EGF-R (pEGF-R), the bioactive form, was also highest on Days 10 and 12. Both forms of receptor decreased to almost undetectable levels during DB regression on Days 17–21. Immunohistochemistry of DB from Ovx rats revealed that only P4 was able to maintain normal expression of EGF-R; RU-486 decreased EGF-R expression within 6 h, and by 24 h EGF-R and pEGF-R were 15% of the Day 10 control group levels. These findings show that EGF-R is a P4-dependent protein associated with stromal cell proliferation and decidualization.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Steroid hormones and epidermal growth factor (EGF) exert similar actions in reproductive tissues. Indeed, a considerable body of evidence indicates that they are mutually interdependent and communicate with one another such that EGF can substitute for steroid hormones and vice versa. Such interrelationships have been especially well documented in the case of estrogen/EGF-actions. For example estrogen is required for expression of EGF receptors (EGF-R) in the endometrium of the nonpregnant uterus [13] and, indeed, EGF may mediate many of the actions of estrogen [48]. There are also reciprocal interactions wherein EGF-induced pathways lead to estrogen-independent phosphorylation of the estrogen receptor (ER) and induction of ER transcriptional activity (reviewed in [9]). Experimental administration of progesterone (P4) can also down-regulate EGF and EGF-related ligands and thereby antagonize some of estrogen's actions on the uterus [8, 10, 11].

The relationship between P4 action and the EGF-R system during pregnancy has not been extensively explored. After ovulation and during pregnancy, P4 becomes the quintessential uterotropic hormone required for decidualization [12, 13], expression of P4 receptors (PR) and ER [14, 15], and stromal cell cycle progression [16]. The EGF/EGF-R system is also important for decidualization [1720]. Piva and coworkers [21] demonstrated that either EGF or basic fibroblast growth factor was required for cell division in cultured stromal cells; however, neither growth factor was mitogenic in the absence of P4. Furthermore, EGF can substitute for estrogen in initiating implantation in ovariectomized (Ovx) rats if P4 is also present [22]. One explanation for P4 dependency may be that the steroid is required for expression of EGF-R. This study demonstrates that the EGF-R is P4-dependent and is most abundant in early pregnancy during proliferation and decidualization of mesometrial stromal cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animal Model

Adult female Holtzman rats weighing 225–250 g were purchased from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN) and bred in the laboratory animal care facility of our institution. All animal care and use were conducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and a protocol approved by the Medical College of Georgia Committee on Animal Use in Research and Education. Pregnancy (Day 1) was identified by the presence of vaginal sperm following overnight exposure to a fertile male. Rats were killed at 0800–0900 h between Days 8 and 21 of pregnancy (term is on Day 22) or as mentioned for specific experiments.

P4 and Estradiol-17ß (E2) Treatment Regimens

In some experiments, pregnant animals were Ovx on Day 8 and Day 12 of pregnancy and treated immediately with the following hormonal regimens: 1) Ovx + Vehicle: this group received 0.2 ml corn oil daily, s.c.. 2) Ovx + E2: this group received 2.0 µg E2 dissolved in 0.2 ml corn oil, s.c. 3) Ovx + P4: a 25-mg pellet of crystalline P4 was placed i.p. via the dorsal incision made for ovariectomy to maintain pregnancy levels of serum P4. A single injection of P4 (0.5 mg, saline/20% ethanol, i.p.) was also given immediately after surgery to ensure continuous high levels of P4 immediately following ovariectomy. Corn oil vehicle was given daily s.c. (0.2 ml). 4) Ovx + P4 and E2: this group received P4 and E2 as described above. Ovx + Vehicle and Ovx + E2 groups were Ovx at 0800–0900 h on Day 9 (instead of Day 8) because tissue harvest was very limited due to extensive degeneration in absence of P4. Because vehicle and E2 treatments have shown similar effects on the PR and histology of the decidua basalis (DB), we used the Ovx + E2 treatment group as the control group for administration of P4 and P4 + E2 [15, 16, 23]. We have previously reported that the serum levels of P4 produced by the pellet implant are comparable with those found in normal pregnancy; however, 2 µg of estradiol-17ß produced serum levels of E2 about 3-fold higher than in normal pregnancy on Day 10 [14, 23].

Antiprogestin Treatment

Twenty-five-milligram pellets of crystalline RU-486 (Mifepristone; 11ß-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-17ß-hydroxy-17{alpha}(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-9,9-dien-3-one) were placed i.p. in otherwise normal pregnant rats at 0830–0900 h on Day 9. Rats also received 0.5 mg RU-486 in saline/40% ethanol i.p. immediately after implantation of a pellet to ensure rapid onset of antiprogestin action. Animals were killed 3, 6, 12, and 24 h later. This regimen of treatment does not alter serum P4 [23]. Although RU-486 is most potent as an antiprogestin, it has significant antiglucocorticoid activity [24]. However, the RU-486 effects described herein are most likely due to blockade of P4 action since they were similar to those induced by ovariectomy and reversed by P4 replacement ([15, 16, 23] and this study). Furthermore, glucocorticoids do not appear to be involved in decidualization [25].

Immunohistochemistry

For immunolocalization of EGF-R, tissues were fixed in buffered formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 6 µm, and mounted on Probe-Plus slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA). Subsequent procedures were as previously described [26]. Briefly, staining procedures used Vectastain Elite ABC kits and diaminobenzidine-nickel chloride as substrate for horseradish peroxidase (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). EGF-R was localized with a polyclonal IgG antibody made in sheep against a recombinant human EGF-R fusion protein at a 1:150 dilution (6.7 µg/ml) (Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake Placid, NY). Specificity of staining was checked by incubating sections with antibody preincubated with 40-fold excess antigen peptide. Tissue sections from 3 to 5 pregnant animals at each stage of pregnancy and for each treatment group were prepared as described and subjectively evaluated for distribution of immunoreactive EGF-R by two investigators without regard to treatment.

Tissue Preparation for Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting

Uteri from Day 8 to Day 17 pregnant rats were rapidly excised and placed in ice-cold saline until dissected. Uteri were carefully laid on a glass plate and placed on the stage of a dissecting microscope. The plate was held at 0–4°C by an underlayer of ice. DB were isolated by gently separating the placenta and myometrial regions with 23-gauge needles. In early pregnancy, the placenta and decidua are at an early stage of differentiation and cannot be reliably separated. For this reason, DB dissected from animals between Days 8 and 10 of pregnancy contain some chorioallantoic cells, but antimesometrial decidua, choriovitelline tissues, fetus, and myometrium were removed. Additionally, the DB begins to regress on Day 14 and becomes too thin to reliably dissect after Day 17. Other details are as described previously [14]. After dissection, DB were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C to -80°C until homogenized. Histologic preparations of DB dissected from rats after Day 10 have shown them to be free of trophoblastic cells. Tissues from a single litter were pooled together; the number of individual DB comprising each pool ranged from 3 to 30 (depending on stage of development and treatment) to yield 0.1–1.0 mg DNA/ml of homogenate.

Tissues were homogenized in a hand-driven glass homogenizer according to the procedures of Cao and colleagues [27] with aprotinin (2 µg/ml) and leupeptin (0.5 µg/ml) added just before use. A 200-µl aliquot of each homogenate was taken for DNA determinations [28]. The homogenate was centrifuged at 700 x g for 10 min, and the supernatant was divided into two equal aliquots. Both were centrifuged at 38 000 x g for 15 min. The resulting pellet from one aliquot was dissolved in 1 ml Laemmli buffer [29] and stored at -20°C until applied to a gel for determination of total EGF-R. The second pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of TEN buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40 containing 150 mM NaCl, gelatin 0.25%, and sodium azide 0.02%) and incubated with rat IgG (1 µg/ml) and protein-A agarose (10 µl/ml) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) for 1 h and centrifuged at 1500 rpm. The supernatant was further incubated with antibody to phosphotyrosine residues (0.4 mg/ml; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for 1 h and then with protein-A agarose (10 µl/ml) for 4 h. The pellets were then resuspended in 1 ml Laemmli buffer and stored at -20°C after centrifugation at 600 x g. This fraction was used to determine the relative amount of the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of the EGF-R.

Immunoblot Analysis

A tissue equivalent of 40 µg DNA was applied to SDS polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed. After electrophoresis, the gel was electroblotted to a nitrocellulose hybridization transfer membrane (Hybond-ECL; Amersham Life Science, Inc., Buckinghamshire, UK). The blots were incubated for 18 h at 4°C in the presence of rabbit (anti-human EGF-R) polyclonal IgG (Santa Cruz) at 2.5 µg/ml. Blots were then washed, incubated with second antibody (1 µl/5 ml), and exposed to detection substrates as described previously [15, 26]. The membranes were exposed to x-ray film for 3 min to 1 h, and the autoradiographs were scanned and quantified by densitometry using Intelligent Quantifier software (Bio Image Systems Corp., Ann Arbor, MI).

Molecular sizes of immunoreactive bands were determined by the comigration of biotinylated SDS-PAGE molecular weight standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) applied to a lane in each gel. Prestained SDS-PAGE standards were also applied to gels to assess transfer efficiency of samples. The relative abundance of EGF-R protein was determined by comparing immunostained bands from experimental samples to the corresponding immunostained bands from a pool of DB (Day 10) similarly prepared and applied to each gel. We have found that this pooled reference preparation is the most reliable way to correct for variations in gel loading, blotting efficiency, antibody efficacy, etc. [14, 26].

Expression of Data and Statistical Analysis

Each value is derived from a pool of DB tissues, usually from a single litter. However, to attain the required number of DB for analysis, occasionally it was necessary to combine DB from more than one litter (e.g., as many as 30 DB were required per pool in early pregnancy and for some treatments, whereas 3 DB per pool were sufficient for others). Observations are reported as means ± SEM (n = 4–6 tissue pools). Statistical analysis was made by one-way ANOVA. When ANOVA indicated significant treatment effects, the Student-Neuman-Keuls multirange test was employed to compare only those pairs of treatment means within a given dependent variable.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
EGF-R Expression during Pregnancy

Immunohistochemistry Intensity of immunoreactive staining for EGF-R in mesometrial stromal cells varied with extent of decidualization and stage of pregnancy (Fig. 1). On Day 8, mature decidualized cells were restricted to the region surrounding the invasive trophectoderm. These cells exhibited relatively weak staining (Fig. 1A, upper right corner), whereas many of the fibroblast-like stromal cells near the myometrium, not yet decidualized, exhibited strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining (Fig. 1A, lower left corner). Almost all stromal cells exhibited intense cytoplasmic and nuclear staining by Day 10 (Fig. 1B).



View larger version (219K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Immunohistochemical localization of EGF-R in the rat DB during pregnancy. The DB are oriented with the myometrium toward the left edge of each photomicrograph and placenta toward the right. A) Day 8. Undifferentiated fibroblasts were more immunoreactive (lower left) than predecidual cells (upper right). B) Day 10. Undifferentiated fibroblasts can be observed on the far left of the photomicrograph, whereas larger predecidual stromal cells can be noted in the far right portion. Almost all of the stromal cells were uniformly and strongly stained for EGF-R. C) Day 12. Mature decidualized cells were present throughout the DB. EGF-R was most abundantly localized on stromal cell membranes located near the border of the JZ. D) Day 14. The zone of intense EGF-R staining was thinner than on Day 12. Stromal cells distal to the JZ usually exhibited only very weak cytoplasmic staining for EGF-R. E) Day 17. DB regressed sufficiently for the photograph to show the entire width of the DB bounded by the JZ and the metrial gland (MG). Some stromal cells of the MG exhibited substantial staining, but most were negative. F) Day 21 (approximately 18–24 h before parturition). DB regression was more extensive, and some stromal cells exhibited significant EGF-R; however, stromal cells of MG were almost all negative. ut gl, Uterine gland; vs, vascular space. Large scale bars equal 60 µm; inset scale bar equals 13 µm. Photographic images of tissue sections were scanned and imported into Adobe Photoshop 5.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA) for labeling and layout. The combined images were printed by a Kodak DS 8650 PS printer (Eastman Kodak Co., New Haven, CT).

By Day 12, stromal cells exemplified the mature decidualized phenotype (Fig. 1C) relative to Day 10 by exhibiting a large increase in cell size, rounding of cell nuclei, and a substantial decrease in extracellular space (reviewed in [30]). Marked zonation of EGF-R expression within the DB was also noted, i.e., strong staining of cytoplasm and cell membranes in the region bordering trophoblast giant cells of the junctional zone (JZ; Fig. 1C). Staining became more diffuse and progressively less intense in cells lying more mesometrially; in fact, lack of cytoplasmic staining produced a clear "halo" around nuclei in many of the more distal cells. Similar zonation was also noted on Day 14 (Fig. 1D), but the stromal cells consistently exhibited a lower level of immunostaining throughout the DB as compared to Day 12. On Days 17 and 21, significant staining of stromal cell membranes and cytoplasm was essentially lost; a few stromal cells were faintly positive for EGF-R, but most were negative (Fig. 1, E and F). A few cells of the metrial gland were weakly positive for EGF-R on Day 17, but this staining disappeared by Day 21 (Fig. 1, E and F, respectively). By Days 17 and 21, the DB had regressed sufficiently for the entire DB to be viewed in cross section (Fig. 1, E and F).

Immunoblots The DB proliferates rapidly in the first half of pregnancy, reaching maximal size at Day 12. It then begins to regress at Day 14, becoming reduced to a relatively thin layer of stromal cells by the end of pregnancy [16]. We hypothesized that the tyrosine-phosphorylated form of EGF-R, the bioactive form [31, 32], would be most abundant during stromal cell proliferation and decline thereafter. Figure 2, A and B, are representative Western blots showing changes in total (tyrosine-phosphorylated and tyrosine-unphosphorylated EGF-R) and tyrosine-phosphorylated (pEGF-R) receptor proteins with the progression of pregnancy. EGF-R and pEGF-R were expressed as doublets of approximately 170 kDa and 172–5 kDa in early pregnancy (as late as Day 12), whereas the more mobile form predominated thereafter. Summary analysis (Fig. 3) showed that total EGF-R was abundantly expressed from Days 8 to 14, roughly reflecting the intensity of in situ immunostaining (Fig. 1). However, by Day 17, EGF-R protein had declined to only 11% of the Day 12 level (p < 0.05). The pEGF-R form gradually increased from Day 8, reaching a peak on Days 10 and 12, and falling to about 20% of the Day 10 level on Days 14 and 17 (p < 0.05).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Representative immunoblots of EGF-R proteins in DB with progression of pregnancy. A) Total EGF-R (tyrosine-phosphorylated and tyrosine-unphosphorylated forms of EGF-R). B) Phosphotyrosine form of EGF-R. Tissue homogenates were immunoprecipitated with antiphosphotyrosine antibody before blotting and incubation with antibody to EGF-R as described in Materials and Methods. The scanned images were imported into Adobe Photoshop 5.0 for labeling and printed by a Kodak XLS8600 printer in the black and white mode (Eastman Kodak Co.).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Summary analysis of changes in total EGF-R and pEGF-R in DB during pregnancy. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4–6. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multirange test. aMean differs from all other means for total EGF-R (p < 0.05); bMean differs from all other means for total EGF-R except Day 10 (p < 0.05); cMean differs from Day 17 mean for total EGF-R (p < 0.05); dMeans differ from all other means for pEGF-R but not each other (p < 0.05); eMean differs from Day 17 mean for pEGF-R (p < 0.05).

P4 and Estrogen Regulation of EGF-R Expression

Immunohistochemistry We next examined the roles of P4 and E2 in regulation of EGF-R after ovariectomy on Day 8 or 9 of pregnancy. Rats were given hormone replacement therapy immediately after ovariectomy for 48 h (P4 or P4 + E2 treatment groups) or for 24 h (E2 only treatment group) before being killed on Day 10. Figure 4 shows representative photomicrographs of the effects of P4 and E2. Treatment with E2 alone resulted in loss of histological integrity and an absence of detectable EGF-R expression (Fig. 4A). The darkly stained cells are primarily invasive granular and agranular leukocytes. On the other hand, P4 was able to maintain normal histological organization of stromal cells and strong expression of cytoplasmic and nuclear reaction product (Fig. 4B) similar to that exhibited in Day 10 untreated control animals (Fig. 1B). However, treatment with P4 + E2 resulted in some strongly positive staining of stromal cells for EGF-R, but many were either weakly stained or negative for EGF-R (Fig. 4C).



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Immunohistochemical localization of EGF-R on Day 10 of pregnancy in the DB after administration of P4 and E2 to Ovx rats. The DB are oriented with myometrium toward the left edge and the implantation site toward the right edge of each photograph. A) Ovx on Day 9 given E2 replacement; B) Ovx on Day 8 given P4 replacement; C) Ovx on Day 8 given E2 + P4 replacement; D) Control. Tissue section incubated with antibody preincubated with 40-fold excess antigen peptide; tissue also serves as a control for Figure 1. Refer to Figure 1B for the normal pregnant condition, i.e., non-Ovx control. Details of treatment regimens given in Materials and Methods. Large scale bars equal 60 µm; inset scale bars equal 13 µm. Photographic images prepared as in Figure 1.

Immunoblots Pellets of the antiprogestin RU-486 were implanted in the next experiments as described in Materials and Methods to ascertain more directly the role of P4 in maintaining EGF-R expression without the stress of surgery or the removal of estrogens. Representative immunoblots of total EGF-R protein (Fig. 5A) and pEGF-R (Fig. 5B) show the effects of RU-486 treatment. Day 9 and Day 10 pregnant animals served as controls: Day 9 represents the level of receptor expression in DB at the onset of RU-486 treatment, and the Day 10 group shows the expected receptor protein expression in absence of 24 h of RU-486 exposure. Figure 6 summarizes the results of Western analysis. RU-486-induced down-regulation of total EGF-R was evident within 6 h of RU-486 exposure, and by 12 h pEGF-R was also reduced (p < 0.05); 24-h exposure reduced total EGF-R and pEGF-R to 13% and 9% of the Day 10 control level, respectively.



View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Representative immunoblots of total EGF-R and pEGF-R proteins in DB after treatment with the antiprogestin RU-486. The Day 9 lane represents the level of EGF-R expression at the time of RU-486 administration, and the Day 10 lane represents the expected level of EGF-R expression in the absence of RU-486. Details of treatment regimen given in Materials and Methods. A) Total EGF-R (tyrosine phosphorylated and tyrosine unphosphorylated forms of EGF-R). B) Phosphotyrosine form of EGF-R. Tissue homogenates were immunoprecipitated with antibody to phosphotyrosine before blotting and incubation with antibody to EGF-R as described in Materials and Methods. Images prepared as in Figure 2.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Summary analysis of changes in total EGF-R and pEGF-R after treatment with the antiprogestin RU-486. Values are means ± SEM; n = 4–6. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls multirange test. aMeans differ from all other means for total EGF-R but not each other (p < 0.05); bMean differs from all other means for pEGF-R (p < 0.05); cMean differs from all other means for pEGF-R (p < 0.05).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Uterine stromal cells proliferate and undergo transformation to the decidualized phenotype under the influence of P4 [13, 21, 25]. Decidualization begins on the antimesometrial side of the uterus at Day 6 with implantation of the blastocyst, whereas the mesometrial fibroblasts begin to decidualize on Day 8, giving rise to the DB [30]. Development of the DB begins in cells adjacent to the implanting trophoblast (i.e., underlying the ectoplacental cone) and progressively spreads mesometrially to distal fibroblasts. On Day 8, only a thin layer of cells are fully decidualized; those located further away from the embryo have morphological features intermediate between mature decidual cells and fibroblasts, sometimes referred to as predecidual cells. A layer of undifferentiated stromal cells lies between the predecidual cells and the myometrium [30]. Decidualization and stromal cell proliferation is complete by Day 12 [16]. The level of EGF-R protein expression appears to be associated with this pattern of decidualization. In early stages (Days 8 and 10), EGF-R was most strongly expressed in undifferentiated and predecidual cells (Fig. 1). Expression of pEGF-R protein was elevated 3-fold on Day 10 as compared to Day 8, suggesting a dramatic enhancement in delivery of mitogenic signals during this most active period of decidualization [32, 33]. That the mitotic index of stromal cells also peaks on Day 10 supports this notion [16].

Although maximum growth and development of DB has been attained by Day 12 [34], this period represents a transitional stage in the life cycle of mesometrial decidual cells, bridging the period of active decidualization and proliferation (Day 10) with that of DB regression (Day 14). Protein synthesis and stromal cell proliferation are substantially decreased on Day 12 as compared to Day 10, but Day 12 levels are higher than those found on Day 14 [16, 34]. The activity of the EGF/EGF-R system also appeared to be in a state of transition on Day 12 in that 21% of total EGF-R was in the bioactive form (i.e., pEGF-R), whereas on Day 10, 68% was bioactive as compared with only 8% on Day 14. EGF-R immunostaining was weak and diffuse throughout the cytoplasm on Day 12 and strongly expressed only on cell membranes of stromal cells in the region of the placental junctional zone (Fig. 1C). Regression on Day 14 was marked by a 75% decline in pEGF-R (Fig. 3), and immunostaining was restricted to stromal cell surface membranes immediately underlying the junctional zone (Fig. 1D). Extensive thinning of the DB had occurred by Days 17 and 21, and few cells were positive for EGF-R (Fig. 1, E and F, and Fig. 3).

The cytoplasmic localization of EGF-R noted in this study has been described by other investigators for a variety of cell types and probably relates to activation of EGF-R by ligand binding, which in turn leads to internalization and accumulation in the cytoplasm of cells [3, 33, 3537]. Functional EGF-R have also been specifically localized to the nucleus, where they may exert additional mitogenic actions [27, 38, 39]. Our observation of immunopositive nuclei, particularly, on Days 8 and 10 of pregnancy support this notion (Fig. 1, A and B, and Fig. 4B). By mid-pregnancy (Day 14) immunostaining was restricted to the cell membranes of stromal cells, suggestive of a relative lack of ligand activation [40] and consistent with the low-to-undetectable level of pEGF-R expression on Days 14 and 17. Thus, high levels of pEGF-R expression corresponded to stromal cell cycle progression, whereas declining expression of this form was associated with DB regression and withdrawal of P4 action (Figs. 3 and 5).

EGF-R expression was down-regulated by antiprogestin (Fig. 6) but could be maintained by P4 after ovariectomy (Fig. 4B). However, P4 is apparently unable to maintain EGF-R expression during DB regression (Days 14 and 17) because EGF-R expression fell markedly from Day 12 levels (Fig. 3) in spite of the fact that serum P4 is still elevated [34, 41]. We have observed similar changes in the ability of P4 action to maintain a variety of stromal cell functions in late pregnancy, which we attribute to the specific down-regulation of the transactivationally important PR-A and PR-B isoforms of the PR [42, 43] that occurs on Day 14 [26]. Expression of these isoforms is also rapidly lost after ovariectomy or treatment with RU-486 on Day 10 [15]. However, PR-C, a transactivationally inactive isoform [44], continues to be abundantly expressed throughout pregnancy and after ovariectomy and RU-486 treatment [15, 26]. We hypothesize that these changes in PR expression may be ultimately responsible for triggering DB regression by withdrawing trophic signals and allowing activation of latent cell death signaling pathways in spite of high levels of circulating P4 [45, 46]. The present findings suggest that EGF-R is a P4-dependent protein associated with decidualization and proliferation of the DB in early pregnancy and that loss of EGF-R expression after Day 12 may be due to altered P4 action.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We gratefully acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Ms. Veronica McCloud. We also thank Dr. R. Deraedt, Roussel-Uclaf, Romainville, France, who generously provided mifepristone (RU-486).


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This work was supported by NIH Grant HD29843 (T.F.O.). Back

2 Correspondence: T.F. Ogle, 1120 15th St., Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-3000. FAX: 706 721 7299; togle{at}mail.mcg.edu Back

3 Current address: Department of Cellular Biology and Anatomy, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912. Back

Accepted: March 2, 1999.

Received: December 10, 1998.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Mukku VR, Stancel GL. Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptors by estrogen. J Biol Chem 1985; 260:9820–9824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lingham RB, Stancel GM, Loose-Mitchell DM. Estrogen regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor messenger ribonucleic acid. Mol Endocrinol 1988; 2:230–235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Imai T, Kurachi H, Adachi K, Adachi H, Yoshimoto Y, Homma H, Takokoro C, Takeda S, Yamaguchi M, Sakata M, Sakoyama Y, Miyake A. Changes in epidermal growth factor receptor and the levels of its ligands during menstrual cycle in human endometrium. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:928–938.[Abstract]
  4. Nelson KG, Takahashi T, Bossert NL, Walmer DK, McLachlan JA. Epidermal growth factor replaces estrogen in the stimulation of female genital-tract growth and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:21–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ignar-Trowbridge DM, Nelson KG, Bidwell MC, Curtis SW, Washburn TF, McLachlan JA, Korach KS. Coupling of dual signalling pathways: epidermal growth factor action involves estrogen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992; 89:4658–4662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Johnson DC, Chatterjee S. epidermal growth factor (EGF) replaces estradiol for the initiation of embryo implantation in the hypophysectomized rat. Placenta 1993; 14:429–438.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Galand P, Rooryck J. Mediation by epidermal growth factor of the estradiol-induced increase in cyclic guanosine 3',5'-monophosphate content in the rat uterus. Endocrinology 1996; 137:1932–1937.[Abstract]
  8. Zhang Z, Laping J, Glasser S, Day P, Mulholland J. Mediators of estradiol-stimulated mitosis in the rat uterine luminal epithelium. Endocrinology 1998; 139:961–966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Smith CL. Cross-talk between peptide growth factor and estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:627–632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kirkland JL, Murthy L, Stancel GM. Progesterone inhibits the estrogen-induced expression of c-fos messenger ribonucleic acid in the uterus. Endocrinology 1992; 130:3223–3230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Das SK, Tsukamura H, Paria BC, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) gene and regulation of EGF-R bioactivity by progesterone and estrogen in the adult mouse uterus. Endocrinology 1994; 134:971–981.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yoshinaga K. Hormonal control of decidualization. In: Beier HM, Karlson P (eds.), Proteins and Steroids in Early Pregnancy. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1982: 15–25.
  13. Weitlauf HM. Biology of Implantation. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. Vol. I. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 391–440.
  14. Ogle TF, George P. Regulation of the estrogen receptor in the decidua basalis of the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:65–77.[Abstract]
  15. Ogle TF, Dai D, George P, Mahesh VB. Regulation of the progesterone receptor and estrogen receptor in decidua basalis by progesterone and estradiol during pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1188–1198.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ogle TF, George P, Dai D. Progesterone and estrogen regulation of rat decidual cell expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:444–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wang XN, Das SK, Damm D, Klagsbrun M, Abraham JA, Dey SK. Differential regulation of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in the adult ovariectomized mouse uterus by progesterone and estrogen. Endocrinology 1994; 135:1264–1271.[Abstract]
  18. Zhang Z, Funk C, Glasser SR, Mulholland J. Progesterone regulation of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor gene expression during sensitization and decidualization in the rat uterus: effects of the antiprogestin, ZK 98.299. Endocrinology 1994; 135:1256–1263.[Abstract]
  19. Fazleabas AT, Hild-Petito S, Verhage HG. Secretory proteins and growth factors of the baboon (Papio ambis) uterus: potential roles in pregnancy. Cell Biol Int 1994; 18:1145–1153.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Taga M, Sakakibara H, Saji M, Minaguchi H. Regulation of human decidual function by epidermal growth factor. Horm Res 1995; 44(suppl 2):23–29.
  21. Piva M, Flieger O, Rider V. Growth factor control of cultured rat uterine stromal cell proliferation is progesterone dependent. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:1333–1342.[Abstract]
  22. Tamada H, Kai Y, Mori J. Epidermal growth factor-induced implantation and decidualization in the rat. Prostaglandins 1994; 47:467–475.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Ogle TF, Mills TM, Costoff A. Progesterone maintenance of the placental progesterone receptor and placental growth in ovariectomized rats. Biol Reprod 1990; 43:276–284.[Abstract]
  24. Baulieu E-E. Contragestion and other clinical application of RU 486, an antiprogesterone at the receptor. Science 1989; 245:1351–1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Irwin JC, Utian WH, Eckert RL. Sex steroids and growth factors differentially regulate the growth and differentially regulate the growth and differentiation of cultured human endometrial stromal cells. Endocrinology 1991; 129:2385–2392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ogle TF, Dai D, George P, Mahesh VB. Stromal cell progesterone and estrogen receptors during proliferation and regression of the decidua basalis in the pregnant rat. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:495–506.[Abstract]
  27. Cao H, Lei ZM, Bian L, Rao CV. Functional nuclear epidermal growth factor receptor in human choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cells and normal human placenta. Endocrinology 1995; 136:3163–3172.[Abstract]
  28. Labarca C, Paigen K. A simple rapid and sensitive DNA assay procedure. Anal Biochem 1980; 102:344–352.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680–685.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Abrahamsohn PA, Zorn TMT. Implantation and decidualization in rodents. J Exp Zool 1993; 266:603–628.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Carpenter G, Cohen S. Epidermal growth factor. J Biol Chem 1990; 265:7709–7712.[Free Full Text]
  32. Lyall RM, Zilberstein A, Gazit A, Gilon C, Levitzki A, Schlessinger J. Tyrphostins inhibit epidermal growth factor (EGF)-receptor tyrosine kinase activity in living cells and EGF-stimulated cell proliferation. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:14503–14509.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Carpenter G. Receptors for epidermal growth factor and other polypeptide mitogens. Annu Rev Biochem 1987; 56:881–914.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Ogle TF, Mills TM, Soares MJ. Changes in cytosolic and nuclear progesterone receptors during pregnancy in rat placenta. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:1012–1019.[Abstract]
  35. Carpenter G, Cohen S. 125I-Labeled human epidermal growth factor: binding, internalization, and degradation in human fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1976; 71:159–171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Haigler H, Ash JF, Singer SJ, Cohen S. Visualization by fluorescence of the binding and internalization of epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells A-431. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:3317–3321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Schlessinger J, Shechter Y, Willingham MC, Pastan I. Direct visualization of binding, aggregation, and internalization of insulin and epidermal growth factor on living fibroblastic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:2659–2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Boonstra J, Rijken P, Humbel B, Cremers F, Verkleij A, Henegouwen PB. The epidermal growth factor. Cell Biol Int 1995; 19:413–430.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Bian L, Lei Z, Rao CV. Mitogen-activated protein kinase is involved in epidermal-growth-factor-regulated protein phosphorylation in nuclear membranes isolated from JEG-3 human choriocarcinoma cells. Eur J Biochem 1998; 253:545–551.[Medline]
  40. Stoscheck CM, Carpenter G. Down regulation of epidermal growth factor receptors: direct demonstration of receptor degradation in human fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1984; 98:1048–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Albrecht ED. Pregnancy in young and aged rats: II. Peripheral serum progesterone concentrations. Biol Reprod 1985; 33:432–435.[Abstract]
  42. Tora L, Gronemeyer H, Turcotte B, Gaub M-P, Chambon P. The N-terminal region of the chicken progesterone receptor specifies target gene activation. Nature 1988; 333:185–188.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Leslie KK, Kumar NS, Richer J, Owen G, Takimoto G, Horwitz KB, Lange C. Differential expression of the A and B isoforms of progesterone receptor in human endometrial cancer cells. Ann New York Acad Sci 1997; 828:17–26.[Medline]
  44. Wei LL, Hawkins P, Baker C, Norris B, Sheridan PL, Quinn PG. An amino-terminal truncated progesterone receptor isoform, PRc, enhances progestin-induced transcriptional activity. Mol Endocrinol 1996; 10:1379–1387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ogle TF, Dai D, George P. Progesterone regulation of cytokine determinants of stromal cell survival and death in decidua basalis. Biol Reprod 1997; 56(suppl 1):226 (abstract 573).
  46. Ogle TF, George P, Dai D. Protein kinase C activity is up-regulated by antiprogestin and linked to stromal cell death in decidua basalis. Biol Reprod 1998; 58(suppl 1):214 (abstract 455).



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
H.-S. Byun, G.-S. Lee, B.-M. Lee, S.-H. Hyun, K.-C. Choi, and E.-B. Jeung
Implantation-Related Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Family Molecules and Their Regulation by Progesterone in the Pregnant Rat
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2008; 15(7): 678 - 689.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
J. H. C. Kengni, I. St-Louis, S. Parent, V. Leblanc, C. Shooner, and E. Asselin
Regulation of prostaglandin D synthase and prostacyclin synthase in the endometrium of cyclic, pregnant, and pseudopregnant rats and their regulation by sex steroids
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2007; 195(2): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Shao, B. Weijdegard, K. Ljungstrom, A. Friberg, C. Zhu, X. Wang, Y. Zhu, J. Fernandez-Rodriguez, E. Egecioglu, E. Rung, et al.
Nuclear progesterone receptor A and B isoforms in mouse fallopian tube and uterus: implications for expression, regulation, and cellular function
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, July 1, 2006; 291(1): E59 - E72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G.-Y. Nie, Y. Li, H. Minoura, J. K. Findlay, and L. A. Salamonsen
Specific and Transient Up-Regulation of Proprotein Convertase 6 at the Site of Embryo Implantation and Identification of a Unique Transcript in Mouse Uterus During Early Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 439 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Liu and T. F. Ogle
Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Is Expressed in the Decidualized Mesometrium of Pregnancy and Associates with the Progesterone Receptor Through Protein-Protein Interactions
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2002; 67(1): 114 - 118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Varayoud, J. G. Ramos, P. P. Joazeiro, G. S. Montes, M. M. Munoz de Toro, and E. H. Luque
Characterization of Fibroblastic Cell Plasticity in the Lamina Propria of the Rat Uterine Cervix at Term
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Dai, B. C. Moulton, and T. F. Ogle
Regression of the Decidualized Mesometrium and Decidual Cell Apoptosis Are Associated with a Shift in Expression of Bcl2 Family Members
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2000; 63(1): 188 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. R. Jones, B. F. Kimler, W. M. Justice, and V. Rider
Transit of Normal Rat Uterine Stromal Cells through G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle Requires Progesterone-Growth Factor Interactions
Endocrinology, February 1, 2000; 141(2): 637 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dai, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ogle, T. F.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS