Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 809-812 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Chromosome Analysis of BALB/c Mouse Spermatozoa with Normal and Abnormal Head Morphology1

Hidefumi Kishikawa2,a, Hiroyuki Tatenoa,b, and Ryuzo Yanagimachia

a Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii Medical School, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 b Department of Biological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Japan 078-8510


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To assess the relationship between mouse sperm head morphology and karyotype, sperm heads with either a normal or an abnormal morphology were injected individually into enucleated mouse oocytes that were karyotyped at the metaphase of the first cleavage. BALB/c male mice that produce an unusually high proportion of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa were used as sperm donors. Abnormal karyotypes were found in a significantly higher proportion of eggs injected with severely misshapen sperm heads (36–38%) as compared to those injected with normal and quasi-normal heads (15–21%) (p < 0.01). Most karyotype abnormalities were structural rather than numerical, the most common being breaks and exchanges of chromosome type in both normal and abnormal spermatozoa.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In many mammalian species, including humans and the great apes, males produce a considerably large number of morphologically abnormal spermatozoa. Reportedly, as compared to normal spermatozoa, morphologically abnormal spermatozoa are less able to pass through the cervix [1, 2], the uterotubal junction [35], and the oocyte vestments [6, 7]. Some strains of mice (e.g., C57BL/Kw, PL/J2-azh/azh, KE, and BALB/c) are known to produce very high proportions of structurally abnormal spermatozoa. However, it is not certain whether all morphologically abnormal spermatozoa are necessarily genetically defective. Burruel et al. [8] microsurgically injected BALB/c mouse spermatozoa into mouse oocytes and found that spermatozoa with grossly misshapen heads were able to produce normal offspring. In the present study, we karyo-analyzed BALB/c mouse spermatozoa with normal and abnormal head morphologies.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

Spermatozoa were collected from caudae epididymides of BALB/cAnNCr mice and hybrid mice B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 x DBA/2J). B6D2F1 females were used as oocyte donors. All mice were purchased through the National Cancer Institute and maintained in a temperature- and light-controlled room (14L:10D) for at least 2 wk before use. When used in experiments B6D2F1 mice were 6–12 wk old, and BALB/c mice were 6–9 mo old. All animals were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Laboratory Animal Service at the University of Hawaii and those prepared by the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Resources National Research Council (DHEW publication no. [NIH] 80–23, revised in 1985). The protocol of our animal handling and treatment was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Hawaii.

Reagents

Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, cold water soluble, molecular weight about 10 000) and polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP, molecular weight about 360 000) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Bovine testicular hyaluronidase (200 USP U/mg) was obtained from ICN Biochemicals (Costa Mesa, CA). BSA (fraction V) was purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and mineral oil from Squibb and Sons (Princeton, NJ). All other reagents were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise stated.

Media

CZB medium [9] supplemented with 5.56 mM D-glucose was used for the culture of mouse oocytes after microsurgery. The medium for collection of oocytes from oviducts and subsequent oocyte treatments, including micromanipulation, was a modified CZB (Hepes-CZB [10]) containing 20 mM Hepes-HCl, a reduced amount of NaHCO3 (5 mM), and 0.1 mg/ml PVA instead of BSA. CZB was used under 5% CO2 in air, and Hepes-CZB was used under air.

Preparation of Oocytes

B6D2F1 females were each injected with 5 IU eCG followed by 5 IU hCG 48 h later. Mature oocytes were collected from oviducts about 15 h after the hCG injection. They were freed from the cumulus cells by 5-min treatment with 0.1% bovine testicular hyaluronidase in Hepes-CZB. The oocytes were rinsed, and before micromanipulation they were kept in CZB medium for up to 4 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in air.

Classification of Head Morphology in BALB/c Spermatozoa

Sperm head morphology was classified according to Burruel et al. [8] as normal, quasi-normal, and grossly abnormal. Quasi-normal heads included those missing the rostral part of the acrosome and/or the posterolateral region of the postacrosomal region. Grossly abnormal heads included collapsed and triangular heads with highly deformed acrosomal caps and nuclei (Fig. 1).



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Head morphology of BALB/c spermatozoa. A) Normal, B) quasi-normal, C) collapsed, D) triangular. Bar = 3 µm.

Enucleation of Oocytes

The oocytes were transferred into a droplet of Hepes-CZB containing 5 µg/ml cytochalasin B, which had previously been placed in the operation chamber on the microscope stage and kept there for 5–10 min. Enucleation of the oocytes was performed by aspirating the metaphase II chromosome-spindle complex up into a pipette (8–10 µm in the inner diameter) with a minimal volume of oocyte cytoplasm [11]. Enucleated oocytes were then transferred into cytochalasin B-free CZB and kept there for up to 3 h at 37°C before sperm injection.

Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI)

ICSI was carried out according to Kimura and Yanagimachi [10], but with some modifications. A drop (50 µl) of sperm suspension was mixed thoroughly with 100 µl of Hepes-CZB medium containing 12% (w:v) PVP (PVP-Hepes). Part of this mixture was transferred to the micromanipulation chamber on the microscope stage. To examine whether the prior separation of the sperm head from the tail and the enucleation of mature oocytes affected the sperm chromosome complement, spermatozoa were injected in three different ways. In the first (I), a single motile spermatozoon with normal head was selected and drawn into an injection pipette of inner diameter of 7–8 µm at the tip. Immediately before injection, a few piezo-pulses were applied to the midpiece region of the spermatozoon to immobilize it; then its whole body was injected into an intact oocyte. In the second procedure (II), a motile spermatozoon with normal head was selected, its head was separated from tail by applying one or a few piezo-pulses to the neck region [12], and the sperm head alone was injected into an intact oocyte. In the third (III), an isolated sperm head obtained as above was injected into an enucleated oocyte. All microsurgical operations were performed at 25°C in Hepes-CZB. Sperm-injected oocytes were cultured in 50-µl droplets of CZB medium under mineral oil at 37°C.

Chromosome Examination

Seven to eight hours after ICSI, the oocytes were transferred into an another droplet (0.2 ml) of CZB containing 0.006 µg/ml vinblastine. Vinblastine prevented mingling of sperm and egg chromosomes by disrupting ooplasmic microtubules. Between 19 and 21 h after ICSI, eggs arrested at metaphase of the first cleavage were treated with 1% (w:v) Pronase (Kaken Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan) for 5 min to remove the zona pellucida, then with a hypotonic solution (1:1 mixture of 1% sodium citrate and 30% fetal bovine serum) for 10 min at room temperature. Fixation of eggs and spreading of chromosomes were performed according to Mikamo and Kamiguchi [13]. The chromosomes on slides were stained with 2% Giemsa solution for 8 min. After conventional chromosome analysis, they were C-banded [14] to detect acentric and dicentric chromosomes [13]. With use of ICSI methods I and II, an oocyte injected with a spermatozoon was considered chromosomally normal when it contained 40 structurally normal chromosomes at the metaphase of the first mitotic division, as we could not always distinguish between chromosomes derived from the male pronucleus and those from the female pronucleus. When method III was used, all the chromosomes were of sperm origin. Thus, with use of method III the normality and abnormality of sperm chromosomes could be assessed without intervention of oocyte chromosomes.

Statistical analysis was done using the chi-square test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference in the incidence of sperm chromosome abnormalities among the three experimental groups. Previous investigators reported that the rate of chromosome abnormality including structural and numerical aberrations derived from the female pronucleus was less than 5% using in vitro fertilization technique [15, 16]. In this study, it was also low (3 of 72, 4.17%) in the oocytes in which male and female pronuclei were clearly separated and chromosomes from male pronuclei contained the Y chromosome. Therefore, we ignored the influence of chromosome abnormalities derived from the female pronucleus when we compared the three methods of injection. Thus, the chromosome complements were not changed either by isolation of sperm heads from tails or by enucleation of oocytes prior to their injection with a spermatozoon.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Analyses of sperm chromosomes after injection into oocytes using three different methods.

Table 2 summarizes chromosome analyses of BALB/c spermatozoa with normal and abnormal head morphologies using method III. The incidence of a normal karyotype was significantly higher in the spermatozoa with normal and quasi-normal heads than in those with severely misshapen heads (p < 0.01). The difference between normal-headed and quasi-normal-headed spermatozoa was not significant with respect to the incidence of normal/abnormal karyotypes. Regardless of sperm head morphology, the predominant types of structural chromosome aberration were breaks and exchanges of chromosome type. There was no great difference in the distribution of aberration types among the four groups of spermatozoa. X/Y ratios were not significantly different from the expected X/Y ratio (= 1) in all the groups of spermatozoa. Finally, no significant increase in aneuploidy was evident in any of the groups. The aneuploidy that did occur in this study involved chromosomes 19 (n-1) or 21 (n+1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Chromosome analysis of Balb/c mouse spermatozoa with normal and abnormal head morphologies: Method III was used.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study shows that about 15% of morphologically normal BALB/c spermatozoa carry chromosomal abnormalities. This percentage was considerably higher than we had anticipated. Several previous groups [1518] have investigated the incidence of chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa by examining sperm chromosomes at the metaphase of the first cleavage of oocytes inseminated in vitro. The values obtained were 1.43% in outbred TO mouse [15], 0.9% in the RFM mouse [16], 4.29% in the C57B1/6J x CBA/Ca hybrid mouse [17], and 8.17% in the ICR mouse [18]. As structurally abnormal mouse spermatozoa seldom fertilize oocytes under ordinary in vivo and in vitro conditions [6], the figures cited above must represent the incidence of chromosomal abnormality in structurally normal spermatozoa.

We found that about 35% of BALB/c spermatozoa with grossly misshapen heads (collapsed and triangular) had chromosome abnormalities, significantly higher than for those with normal or quasi-normal heads (15–20%) (p < 0.01–0.0001) (Table 2). There were no significant differences, however, between normal and quasi-normal spermatozoa in that regard (Table 2). All aneuploidy that we found in this study involved either 19 (n-1), or 21 (n+1), and its incidence was 0–1.9%. This is in agreement with a previous report indicating that hyperploidy occurs in less than 0.4% of secondary spermatocytes in BALB/c [19]. Lee et al. [20] found that the incidence of structural chromosome aberrations in human spermatozoa with deformed heads (26.1%) was almost four times higher than in those with normal heads (6.9%). Although it has been believed that there are no correlations between sperm (head) morphology, concentrations of DNA/non-DNA materials, and the sperm karyotype [4, 18, 2123], our results suggest that structurally abnormal spermatozoa are apt to have chromosome abnormalities.

According to the study by Hugenholtz and Bruce [24], various mutagenic agents can induce misshapen mouse spermatozoa. These investigators maintain that sperm shape is highly controlled by various autosomal and sex chromosomal factors and is highly heritable. The high incidence of chromosome aberrations reported here in structurally abnormal spermatozoa could be due to the action of defective genes that cause abnormalities in sperm chromosomes as well as in sperm head morphology.

The nuclei of structurally normal and abnormal spermatozoa may differ in the rate of decondensation after entry in the oocytes. According to Tateno and Kamiguchi [25], sperm chromosomes tend to break when decondensation of sperm nuclei within activated oocytes is delayed. Even though there may be no strict relationship between sperm head morphology and S-S concentration of sperm protamine [21, 23], differences in some other structural or chemical components of normal and abnormal spermatozoa may result in marked differences in the behavior of their nuclei within oocytes.

Finally, the unexpectedly high incidence of chromosomal abnormality reported here may be due, in part, to the techniques employed. Whole sperm heads or even entire spermatozoa were injected directly into oocytes. The intact acrosome and the overlying sperm plasma membrane, which never enter the ooplasm during normal fertilization [26], were injected into the ooplasm. Kimura et al. [27] showed that mouse oocytes injected with mouse spermatozoa survived and developed into normal offspring, whereas those injected with hamster or rabbit spermatozoa did not. Even though mouse oocytes were activated by hamster and rabbit spermatozoa, all of them became deformed and then degenerated (see Figs. 1 and 2 of Kimura et al. [27]). Interestingly, the oocytes survived and did not degenerate when hamster and rabbit spermatozoa were sonicated before injection. As sonication removes almost all of the acrosomal contents from sperm heads, it could be that the acrosomal contents (enzymes) in hamster and rabbit spermatozoa damaged the mouse oocytes. It is known that the acrosomal enzymes are present in the principal segment of the acrosome. As this region of the acrosome is much smaller in mouse spermatozoa than in hamster and rabbit spermatozoa [26], the survival of mouse oocytes after injection of intact mouse spermatozoa may be related to the small size of this region of the acrosome. Even though the amount of acrosomal enzymes introduced into each oocyte is very small, such exogenous enzymes may nevertheless damage the sperm nucleus. Thousands of apparently healthy human offspring have been born through the ICSI procedure [28, 29], which involves direct injection of acrosome-intact spermatozoa into oocytes. Many normal mouse offspring were also born after ICSI using acrosome-intact spermatozoa [10, 30, 31]. However, this does not imply that all the oocytes injected with acrosome-intact spermatozoa had developed normally. It is highly probable that some sperm-injected oocytes did not develop normally and were aborted before or after implantation. It is possible that the acrosome (acrosomal enzymes) introduced into an oocyte by ICSI damages the oocyte's cytoplasm and/or nucleus. Under normal conditions, the fertilizing spermatozoon discards virtually all acrosome material before it unites with an oocyte [26]. Two reports indicated that mouse and human oocytes developed better when acrosome-reacted spermatozoa were injected rather than acrosome-intact ones [31, 32]. The reason for this is unknown, but it could be that the acrosome contents (enzymes) introduced into the oocyte's cytoplasm interfere with normal embryo development. Some mouse and human oocytes may be able to tolerate exotic acrosomal enzymes, but others may not. We are now investigating whether this assumption is valid.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. J.M. Bedford (Cornell University Medical College) and J.W. Overstreet (University of California at Davis) for reading the original manuscript. Their valuable comments are greatly appreciated.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by grants from the NIH (HD-34362). Back

2 Correspondence: H. Kishikawa, Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii Medical School, 1960 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822. FAX: 808 956 5474; kishi{at}uro.med.osaka-u.ac.jp Back

Accepted: April 29, 1999.

Received: March 5, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hanson FW, Overstreet JW. The interaction of human spermatozoa with cervical mucus in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140:173–178.[Medline]
  2. Mortimer D, Leslie EE, Kelly RW, Templeton AA. Morphological selection of human in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 64:391–399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Krzanowska H. The passage of abnormal spermatozoa through the uterotubal junction of the mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 38:81–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. de Bore P, van der Hoeven FA, Chardon JAP. The production, morphology, karyotypes and transport of spermatozoa from tertiary trisomic mice and the consequences of egg fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1976; 48:245–256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Nestor A, Handel MA. The transport of morphologically abnormal sperm in the female reproductive tract of mice. Gamete Res 1984; 10:119–125.
  6. Krzanowska H, Lorenc E. Influence of egg investments on in vitro penetration of mouse eggs by misshapen spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1983; 68:57–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Olds-Clarke P, Becker A. The effect of the T/t locus on sperm penetration in vitro in the house mouse. Biol Reprod 1978; 18:132–140.[Abstract]
  8. Burruel VR, Yanagimachi R, Whitten WK. Normal mice develop from oocytes injected with spermatozoa with grossly misshapen heads. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:709–714.[Abstract]
  9. Chatot CL, Lewis L, Torres I, Ziomek CA. Development of one-cell embryos from different strains of mice in CZB medium. Biol Reprod 1990; 42:432–440.[Abstract]
  10. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:709–720.[Abstract]
  11. Wakayama T, Perry ACF, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 1998; 394:369–374.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Kuretake S, Kimura Y, Hoshi K, Yanagimachi R. Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes injected with isolated sperm heads. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:789–795.[Abstract]
  13. Mikamo K, Kamiguchi Y. A new assessment system for chromosomal mutagenesis using oocytes and early zygotes of the Chinese hamster. In: Ishihara T, Sasaki MS (eds.), Radiation-Induced Chromosome Damage in Man. New York: Alan R. Riss; 1983: 411–432.
  14. Summer AT. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 1972; 15:467–470.
  15. Fraser LR, Maudlin I. Analysis of aneuploidy in first-cleavage mouse embryos fertilized in vitro and in vivo. Environ Health Perspect 1979; 31:141–149.[Medline]
  16. Matsuda Y, Yamada T, Tobari I. Studies on chromosome aberrations in the eggs of mice fertilized in vitro after irradiation. I. Chromosome aberrations induced in sperm after X-irradiation. Mutat Res 1985; 148:113–117.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Santalo J, Estop AM, Egozcue J. The chromosome complement of first-cleavage mouse embryos after in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1986; 3:99–105.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Martin-Deleon PA. Analysis of the chromosome complement in outbred mouse sperm fertilizing in vitro. Gamete Res 1989; 22:71–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Zordan M, Russo A, Costa R, Bianeo N, Beltrame C, Levis AG. A concerted approach to the study of the aneuploidogenic properties of two chelating agents (EGTA and NTA) in the germ and somatic cell lines of drosophila and the mouse. Environ Mol Mutagen 1990; 15:205–213.[Medline]
  20. Lee JD, Kamiguchi Y, Yanagimachi R. Analysis of chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa with normal and aberrant head morphologies after injection into mouse oocytes. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:1942–1946.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. de Bore P, Redi CA, Garagna S, Winking H. Protamine amount and cross linking in mouse teratospermatozoa and aneuploid spermatozoa. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 25:297–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Martin RH, Rademaker A. The relationship between sperm chromosomal abnormalities and sperm morphology in humans. Mutat Res 1998; 207:159–164.[CrossRef]
  23. Pogany GC, Balhorn R. Quantitative fluorometry of abnormal mouse sperm nuclei. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96:25–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hugenholtz AP, Bruce WR. Radiation induction of mutations affecting sperm morphology in mice. Mutat Res 1983; 107:177–185.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Tateno H, Kamiguchi Y. Improvement of male pronuclear formation during cross-fertilization between Chinese hamster spermatozoa and Syrian hamster oocytes by nocodazole, and chromosome analysis of hybrid zygotes. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 52:117–124.[CrossRef]
  26. Yanagimachi R. Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 189–317.
  27. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R, Kuretake S, Bortkiewicz H, Perry ACF, Yanagimachi H. Analysis of mouse oocyte activation suggests the involvement of sperm perinuclear material. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1407–1415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Wisanto A, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC, Liebaers I. Prospective follow-up study of 877 children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, with ejaculated epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod 1996; 11(suppl 4):131–155.
  29. Bonduelle M, Aytoz A, Van Assche E, Devroey P, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Incidence of chromosomal aberrations in children born after assisted reproduction through intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:781–782.[Free Full Text]
  30. Ahmadi A, Ng SC, Liow SL, Ali J, Bongso A, Ratnam SS. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection of mouse oocytes with 5 mM Ca2+ at different intervals. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:431–435.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lacham-Kaplan O, Trounson A. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in mice: increased fertilization and development to term after induction of the acrosome reaction. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:2642–2649.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Lee DR, Lim YJ, Lee JE, Kim HJ, Yoon HS, Roh SI. Induction of acrosome reaction in spermatozoa accelerates development of fertilized human oocyte after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In: Proc Am Soc Reprod Med Ann Meeting; 1996; Boston, MA. Abstract p-008.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yamagata, R. Suetsugu, and T. Wakayama
Assessment of chromosomal integrity using a novel live-cell imaging technique in mouse embryos produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection
Hum. Reprod., July 2, 2009; (2009) dep236v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ohta, Y. Sakaide, and T. Wakayama
Age- and substrain-dependent sperm abnormalities in BALB/c mice and functional assessment of abnormal sperm by ICSI
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 775 - 781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Kusakabe, R. Yanagimachi, and Y. Kamiguchi
Mouse and human spermatozoa can be freeze-dried without damaging their chromosomes
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Tateno and Y. Kamiguchi
Evaluation of Chromosomal Risk Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Suganuma, R. Yanagimachi, and M. L. Meistrich
Decline in fertility of mouse sperm with abnormal chromatin during epididymal passage as revealed by ICSI
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3101 - 3108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y. Araki, M. Yoshizawa, and Y. Araki
A novel method for chromosome analysis of human sperm using enucleated mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1244 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Suganuma, C. M. Walden, T. D. Butters, F. M. Platt, R. A. Dwek, R. Yanagimachi, and A. C. van der Spoel
Alkylated Imino Sugars, Reversible Male Infertility-Inducing Agents, Do Not Affect the Genetic Integrity of Male Mouse Germ Cells During Short-Term Treatment Despite Induction of Sperm Deformities
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 805 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Kaneko, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Effect of pH Value of Freeze-Drying Solution on the Chromosome Integrity and Developmental Ability of Mouse Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 136 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Szczygiel, H. Kusakabe, R. Yanagimachi, and D. G. Whittingham
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Is More Efficient than In Vitro Fertilization for Generating Mouse Embryos from Cryopreserved Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1278 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Kusakabe, M. A. Szczygiel, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Maintenance of genetic integrity in frozen and freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa
PNAS, November 9, 2001; (2001) 241517598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and S. Kahraman
Certain forms of morphological anomalies of spermatozoa may reflect chromosomal aneuploidies
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1779 - 1780.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Akutsu, L. L. Tres, H. Tateno, R. Yanagimachi, and A. L. Kierszenbaum
Offspring from Normal Mouse Oocytes Injected with Sperm Heads from the azh/azh Mouse Display More Severe Sperm Tail Abnormalities than the Original Mutant
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Sztein, J. S. Farley, and L. E. Mobraaten
In Vitro Fertilization with Cryopreserved Inbred Mouse Sperm
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1774 - 1780.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Kusakabe, M. A. Szczygiel, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Inaugural Article: Maintenance of genetic integrity in frozen and freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa
PNAS, November 20, 2001; 98(24): 13501 - 13506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kishikawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS