Biol Reprod 2009 SSR Annual Meeting Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 999-1004 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Transforming Growth Factor ß Signal Transducer Smad2 Is Expressed in Mouse Meiotic Germ Cells, Sertoli Cells, and Leydig Cells During Spermatogenesis1

Rui-An Wanga, and Guang-Quan Zhao2,a

a Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although previous studies have shown that members of the transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) family are expressed in the seminiferous tubules, the functions of these growth factors in spermatogenesis remain elusive. In order to shed light on the mechanisms of TGFß action in spermatogenesis, it is crucial to determine whether and where their downstream signaling molecules are expressed in the testis. We examined the expression of Smad2, an intracellular signal transducer of the TGFßs, in mouse testes by in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. Both Smad2 mRNA and protein were detected in meiotic germ cells, from preleptotene to pachytene spermatocytes, but not in postmeiotic germ cells. Smad2 expression was also observed in interstitial cells and Sertoli cells. Therefore, our data provide molecular evidence for TGFß signal transduction during spermatogenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Mammalian spermatogenesis is a unique and complex developmental process. Spermatogonia, the stem cell population, undergo mitosis and differentiate into primary spermatocytes. These cells in turn undergo meiosis, and differentiate into secondary spermatocytes and spermatids. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes are poorly understood.

The transforming growth factor ß (TGFß) superfamily of growth factors contains a growing number of structurally related but functionally diverse polypeptides, including TGFßs, activins/inhibins, decapentaplegic proteins, and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [1]. They exert a wide range of biological effects on cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival [1, 2]. These proteins function as homodimers or heterodimers and bind to serine/threonine kinase receptor complexes. Upon ligand binding, type II receptors activate the type I receptor subunits by phosphorylation [1, 2]. The type I receptors then phosphorylate SMAD proteins, a group of recently identified proteins responsible for intracellular signal transduction of the TGFß superfamily [36]. At least 10 Smad genes have been identified in vertebrates. All SMAD proteins share two highly conserved amino- and carboxy-terminal dominants separated by a more diverse proline-rich region [3]. SMAD1, SMAD5, and SMAD8 mediate the action of BMPs [710], while SMAD2 and SMAD3 are specific for TGFß and activin signaling [1, 2, 1116]. SMAD6 and SMAD7 negatively regulate other SMAD proteins by preventing their phosphorylation [1, 2, 1719].

Despite the fact that TGFßs are expressed in the seminiferous tubules [20, 21], their roles in spermatogenesis are far from clear. To shed some light on this issue, we have investigated the expression of Smad2 in developing and adult mouse testes.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Tissue Preparation

Male mice of outbred genetic backgrounds (129SvEv x Swissblack) of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 wk of age were used for testis collection. Testes were dissected out and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS, or Bouin's solution for 2–12 h according to the size. After dehydration, testes were embedded in Paraplast (Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, PA). Testes fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS were cut into 7-µm-thick sections and mounted onto slides for in situ hybridization, and those fixed with Bouin's solution were cut into 4-µm-thick sections for immunohistochemistry.

In Situ Hybridization

In situ hybridization was done essentially as previously described [22]. A 1-kilobase DNA fragment corresponding to the 3' untranslated region of murine Smad2 was subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and used for riboprobe synthesis. RNA probes were labeled with [{alpha}-35S]UTP to a specific activity of 1.0 x 109 cpm/µg. Hybridization was carried out at 60–65°C for 16–20 h in buffer containing 2 x 104 cpm/µl riboprobes, 50% formamide, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaH2PO4 (pH 6.8), 5 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.2% Ficoll 400, 0.2% polyvinyl pyrolidone, 10% dextran sulfate, 200 µg/ml yeast total RNA, and 50 mM dithiothreitol. Two rounds of 30-min high-stringency washes were carried out in double-strength SSC (single-strength SSC is 0.15 M sodium chloride, 0.015 M sodium citrate), 50% formamide at 60–65°C. Slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2 emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 3 wk at 4°C, developed, fixed, stained in Mayer's hematoxylin for 3–5 min, and then mounted with Permount (Fisher Scientific Co.) for photography. Sense probe hybridization was used as control for background levels.

Immunohistochemistry

The standard avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC) staining method was adopted. Briefly, the sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated through descending concentrations of ethanol, immersed in 0.3% H2O2/methanol for 30 min, and washed with PBS. The sections were then sequentially incubated with 1% normal rabbit serum for 1 h, goat anti-SMAD2 IgG (2 µg/ml; cat. no. SC-6200, Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) for 2 h, biotin-labeled rabbit anti-goat IgG (1:100; Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA) for 1 h, and ABC (1:100; Vector Labs.) for 30 min, with intervening PBS washes after each incubation. Finally, the antigen sites were visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB)/hydrogen peroxide solution, and the sections were counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin for 30 sec. For specificity control, the primary antibody was incubated at a working dilution with 20 µg/ml synthesized SMAD2 peptides for 2 h and then used to stain the adjacent sections. All the reactions were carried out at room temperature.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Smad2 Expression in Mouse Testes During Postnatal Development

As shown in Figure 1, Smad2 mRNA messages were detected in the seminiferous tubules of postnatal mouse testes at all ages. In the testes of 1-wk-old mice, Smad2 mRNA signals were observed in germ cells from preleptotene to zygotene spermatocytes (Fig. 2A) and also in the center of the seminiferous tubules, an area corresponding to the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells (Figs. 1A and 2A). In the testes of 2- to 3-wk-old mice, strong Smad2 mRNA signals were detected in germ cells from preleptotene to pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 2, B and C). From 4-wk-old on, high levels of Smad2 hybridization signals were observed at the periphery of the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 1, C and D), where preleptotene to pachytene meiotic germ cells reside (Fig. 2D). No obvious signals were detected in cells with characteristics of spermatogonia, small nuclei, and localization near the basement membrane (Fig. 2, A, B, and D).



View larger version (206K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Developmental expression of Smad2 in mouse testes. Left panels, darkfield photomicrographs; right panels, brightfield photomicrographs of the corresponding darkfield. A) A section through a testis of a 1-wk-old mouse. Strong signals are observed in all the seminiferous tubules, especially in the center. B) A section through a testis of a 2-wk-old mouse. Every layer of the germinal epithelium shows hybridization signals. C, D) Sections from 4- and 8-wk-old mice, respectively. Strong signals are detected at the periphery of the seminiferous tubules, and the signals are much weaker in the areas toward the lumen. Scale bar = 120 µm in A, 240 µm in B and C, 480 µm in D.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. High-power magnification of seminiferous tubules to show Smad2 expression at cellular levels. A) A section through a testis of a 1-wk-old mouse. Signals were observed in early meiotic germ cells, as well as in the center of the seminiferous tubules (Sertoli cell cytoplasm). B) A section through a testis of a 2-wk-old mouse. Signals were detected from preleptotene to zygotene spermatocytes (arrows) and early stages of pachytene spermatocytes (large arrowheads). C). A section through a testis of a 3-wk-old mouse. Strong signals were detected in the pachytene spermatocytes (large arrowheads). D) A section through a testis of a 4-wk-old mouse. Signals were detected in leptotene, zygotene, and pachytene spermatocytes. No obvious signals were associated with spermatids. Small arrowheads point to cells at the periphery of the seminiferous tubules that did not show detectable Smad2 expression and were probably spermatogonia. Scale bar = 24 µm

Smad2 Expression in Relationship to the Cycling of Seminiferous Tubules

Russell's staging system was adopted for our studies [23]. As shown in Figure 3, Smad2 mRNAs were detected in every stage of the cycle, but in different cell groups. From stages I to VII, high levels of silver grains were observed in pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 3, A–F). A reduced level of Smad2 signals was detected in pachytene spermatocytes of stage XIII–X (Fig. 3, G and H). Smad2 messages were also detected in meiotic germ cells close to the basement membrane (from preleptotene to zygotene stages; Fig. 3, A and G–J). Hybridization signals were barely detectable in diplotene (Fig. 3I) and metaphase (Fig. 3J) spermatocytes, spermatids, and the small cells close to the basement membrane with characteristics of spermatogonia (Fig. 3, A–C and I). In summary, Smad2 messages were mainly detected in preleptotene, leptotene, zygotene, and pachytene spermatocytes.



View larger version (154K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Smad2 expression in relationship with the cycling seminiferous epithelium. A, B) Stage I to II–III seminiferous tubules. Large arrowheads indicate early stage pachytene spermatocytes with strong signals. C–G) Stage IV to VIII seminiferous tubules. Strong signals were found in pachytene spermatocytes (large arrowheads). In stage VIII, note the reduction of signals in pachytene spermatocytes when compared to previous stages and the higher levels of expression in preleptotene spermatocytes (small arrow in G). H–J) Stage X to XII seminiferous tubules. Signals were detected in leptotene and zygotene (arrows) spermatocytes. The last-stage pachytene spermatocytes (arrowheads in H) showed a low signal level, while signal levels detected in the diplotene (arrowheads in I) and metaphase (arrowheads in J) stages were not significant. Small arrowheads in A, B, C, and I point to cells at the periphery of the seminiferous tubules that did not show detectable Smad2 expression and were probably spermatogonia. Scale bar = 24 µm

Immunohistochemical staining with anti-SMAD2 antibodies showed a similar result of Smad2 expression at the protein level in the adult mouse testes. Strong staining was found in the meiotic germ cells, and weak or no staining was observed in spermatids. Negative control staining with peptide-preabsorbed antibodies produced a negligible background staining (Fig. 4).



View larger version (229K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Immunohistochemical detection of SMAD2 in mouse testes. A) A section through a testis of a 4-wk-old mouse, stained with anti-SMAD2 antibodies, shows a positive staining in all seminiferous tubules. Arrows point to the Sertoli cell staining pattern. B) A section adjacent to A stained with antibodies preabsorbed with SMAD2 peptides produced a negligible background staining. C, E) Higher magnifications showing Smad2 proteins in pachytene spermatocytes (small arrowheads) and Leydig cells (large arrowheads). D, F) Sections adjacent to C and E stained with antibodies preabsorbed with SMAD2 peptides. No clear staining was detected in round and elongated spermatids (in C and E). However, a strong nonspecific staining was detected in an unidentified structure in the cytoplasm of pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids (small arrow in C), which was also observed in controls (small arrow in D). Such nonspecific staining could be observed with all antibodies we purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., including antibodies against SMAD1, SMAD3, SMAD4, SMAD5, BMP2, BMP4, BMP7, BMP8, and TGFß receptors. Scale bar = 60 µm in A and B, and 24 µm in C–F.

Smad2 Expression in Sertoli and Interstitial Cells

Smad2 messages were found in the center of seminiferous tubules at 1 wk of age, which corresponds to the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells. To further verify Smad2 expression in Sertoli cells, we used Bmp8b null mutant testes for in situ hybridization. Strong signals were detected in both the germ cell-free seminiferous tubules and the tubules with normal morphology (Fig. 5). Immunohistochemistry with SMAD2 antibodies also showed positive staining in Sertoli cells (Fig. 4). Furthermore, Smad2 expression was detected in interstitial cells by both in situ hybridization (Figs. 2 and 3) and immunohistochemistry (Fig. 4).



View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Smad2 expression in the Bmp8b null mutant mouse testes. Brightfield (A) and darkfield (B) photomicrographs of a Bmp8b mutant testis. Strong signals were detected in both the germ cell-free seminiferous tubules (asterisk) and the tubules with normal morphology. Scale bar = 480 µm


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although members of the TGFß superfamily are expressed in the testes [2022, 2428], their functions in male reproduction are not yet clear. Thus far, Smad1, the intracellular signal transducer of BMPs, has been the only documented case of Smad expression in male germ cells, from pachytene spermatocytes to stage 1 spermatids [29]. In this study, we present the expression pattern of Smad2, the intracellular signaling molecule of both TGFßs and activin, in postnatal mouse testes and during the cycling of the seminiferous epithelium. Smad2 expression during postnatal development and the cycling seminiferous epithelium was detected much earlier than Smad1 expression. Smad2 messages could be detected at 1 wk of age, while Smad1 expression is barely detectable until 2 wk of age. Smad2 expression was detected from preleptotene to pachytene spermatocytes, while Smad1 expression is observed from mid-stages of pachytene spermatocytes to the early stage of round spermatids [29].

Smad2 has been found to exert a wide spectrum of functions in regulating cell growth and differentiation [36, 3033]. For example, during early development, Smad2 plays a pivotal role in patterning the left-right, and anterior-posterior axis formation of the embryo disc, as well as in inducing the formation of mesoderm [3032]. Later, Smad2 functions during the morphogenesis of the lung and during craniofacial development [31, 33]. Furthermore, mutations of Smad2 have been found in human cancers such as colorectal carcinoma [34]. These obviously suggest that Smad2 plays an important role in inhibiting cell proliferation and promoting cell differentiation.

Our findings of Smad2 expression in preleptotene, leptotene, zygotene, and pachytene spermatocytes provide direct evidence for the molecular mechanism of TGFß action during spermatogenesis. The different expression patterns of Smad2 and Smad1 suggest that BMPs, TGFßs, and activin may be involved in different aspects of spermatogenesis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This work was initiated when G.-Q. Zhao was a research associate in Dr. Brigid Hogan's laboratory at Vanderbilt University. The authors are grateful to Dr. Hogan for her support and encouragement.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This research was supported by NIH grant No. HD 36218. Back

2 Correspondence. FAX: 573 884 5414; zhaog{at}missouri.edu Back

Accepted: May 19, 1999.

Received: March 29, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Massague J. TGFß signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 1998; 67:753–791.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Wrana JL. TGF-ß receptors and signaling mechanisms. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1998; 24:120–130.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Derynck R, Zhang Y. Intracellular signaling: the mad way to it. Curr Biol 1996; 6:1226–1229.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Attisano L, Wrana JL. Mads and Smads in TGFß signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1998; 10:188–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kretzschmar M, Massague J. SMADs: mediators and regulators of TGFß signaling. Curr Opin Gen Dev 1998; 8:103–111.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Padgett RW, Cho SH, Evangelista C. Smads are the central component in transforming growth factor-ß signaling. Pharmacol Ther 1998; 78:47–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Liu F, Hata A, Baker JC, Doody J, Carcamo J, Harland RM, Massague J. A human Mad protein acting as a BMP-regulated transcriptional activator. Nature 1996; 381:620–623.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Hoodless PA, Haerry T, Abdollah S, Stapleton M, O'Connor MB, Attisano L, Wrana JL. Madr1, a Mad-related protein that functions in BMP2 signaling pathways. Cell 1996; 85:489–500.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nishimura R, Kato Y, Chen D, Harris SE, Mundy GR, Yoneda T. Smad5 and DPC4 are key molecules in mediating BMP-2-induced osteoblastic differentiation of the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:1872–1879.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chen Y, Bhusan A, Vale W. Smad8 mediates the signaling of the receptor serine kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:12938–12943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chen Y, Lebrun J, Vale W. Regulation of transforming growth factor-ß and activin-induced transcription by mammalian Mad proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:1292–1297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. de Caestecker MP, Parks WT, Frank CJ, Castagnino P, Bottaro DP, Roberts AB, Lechleider RJ. Smad2 transduces common signals from receptor serine-threonine and tyrosine kinases. Genes Dev 1998; 12:1587–1592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Graff JM, Bansal A, Melton DA. Xenopus Mad proteins transduce distinct subsets of signals for the TGF-ß family. Cell 1996; 85:479–487.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Baker JC, Harland RM. A novel mesoderm inducer, Madr2, functions in the activin signal transduction pathway. Genes Dev 1996; 10:1880–1889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Howell M, Hill CS. Smad2 directly activates the activin-inducible, dorsal mesoderm gene XFKH1 in Xenopus embryos. EMBO J 1997; 16:7411–7421.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Nakao A, Roijer E, Imamura T, Souchelnytskyi S, Stenman G, Heldin CH, ten Dijke P. Identification of Smad2, a human Mad-related protein in the transforming growth factor-ß signaling pathway. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:2896–2900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Imamura T, Takase M, Nishihara A, Oeda E, Hanai J, Kawabata M, Miyazono K. Smad6 inhibits signaling by the TGF-ß superfamily. Nature 1997; 389:549–551.[Medline]
  18. Hayashi H, Abdollah S, Qiu Y, Cai J, Xu Y, Grinnell BW, Richardson MA, Topper JN, Gimbrone MA Jr, Wrana JL, Falb D. The Mad-related protein Smad7 associates with the TGFß receptor and functions as an antagonist of TGFß signaling. Cell 1997; 89:1165–1173.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nakao A, Afrakhte M, Moren A, Nakayama T, Christian JL, Heuchel R, Itoh S, Kawabata M, Heldin NE, Heldin CH, ten Dijke P. Identification of Smad7, a TGFß inducible antagonist of TGFß signaling. Nature 1997; 389:631–635.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Olaso R, Gautier C, Levacher C, Durand P, Saez J, Habert R. The immunohistochemical localization of transforming growth factor-ß in the fetal and neonatal rat testis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1997; 126:165–172.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Caussanel V, Tabone E, Hendrick JC, Dacheux F, Benahmed M. Cellular distribution of transforming growth factor ßs 1, 2, and 3 and their types I and II receptors during postnatal development and spermatogenesis in the boar testis. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:357–367.[Abstract]
  22. Zhao GQ, Hogan BLM. Evidence that mouse Bmp8a and Bmp8b are duplicated genes that play a role in spermatogenesis and placental development. Mech Dev 1996, 57:159–168.
  23. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990: 119–161.
  24. Zhao GQ, Deng K, Labosky PA, Liaw L, Hogan BRL. The gene encoding bone morphogenetic protein 8B is required for the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Genes Dev 1996; 10:1657–1669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Zhao GQ, Liaw L, Hogan BLM. Bone morphogenetic protein 8A plays a role in the maintenance of spermatogenesis and the integrity of the epididymis. Development 1998; 125:1103–1112.[Abstract]
  26. Roberts V, Meunier H, Sawchenko PE, Vale W. Differential production and regulation of inhibin subunits in rat testicular cell types. Endocrinology 1989; 125:2350–2359.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Matzuk MM, Finegold MJ, Su JG, Hsueh AJ, Bradley A. {alpha}-Inhibin is a tumor-suppressor gene with gonadal specificity in mice. Nature 1992; 360:313–319.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Behringer RR, Finegold MJ, Cate RL. Müllerian-inhibiting substance function during mammalian sexual development. Cell 1994; 79:415–425.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Zhao GQ, Hogan BLM. Evidence that mothers-against-dpp-related 1 (Madr1) plays a role in the initiation and maintenance of spermatogenesis in the mouse. Mech Dev 1997; 61:63–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nomura M, Li E. Smad2 role in mesoderm formation, left-right patterning and craniofacial development. Nature 1998; 393:737–739.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Waldrip WR, Bikoff EK, Hoodless PA, Wrana JL, Robertson EJ. Smad2 signaling in extra-embryonic tissues determines anterior-posterior polarity of the early mouse embryo. Cell 1998; 92:797–808.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Weinstein M, Yang X, Li C, Su X, Gotay J, Deng CX. Failure of egg cylinder elongation and mesoderm induction in mouse embryos lacking the tumor suppressor Smad2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:9378–9383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Zhao J, Lee M, Smith S, Warburton D. Abrogation of Smad3 and Smad2 or of Smad4 gene expression positively regulates murine embryonic lung branching morphogenesis in culture. Dev Biol 1998; 194:182–195.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Eppert K, Scherer SW, Ozcelik H, Pirone R, Hoodless P, Kim H, Tsui L, Andrulis IL, Thomsen GH, Wrana JL, Attisano L. Madr2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGF-ß-regulated Mad-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma. Cell 1996; 86:543–552.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
Q. Li, J. M. Graff, A. E. O'Connor, K. L. Loveland, and M. M. Matzuk
SMAD3 Regulates Gonadal Tumorigenesis
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 21(10): 2472 - 2486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. C Fleisch, C. A Maxwell, and M.-H. Barcellos-Hoff
The pleiotropic roles of transforming growth factor beta in homeostasis and carcinogenesis of endocrine organs.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 379 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
R.-A. Wang, M. Zhao, M. L. Meistrich, and R. Kumar
Stage-specific Expression of Dynein Light Chain-1 and Its Interacting Kinase, p21-activated Kinase-1, in Rodent Testes: Implications in Spermiogenesis
J. Histochem. Cytochem., October 1, 2005; 53(10): 1235 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W.-y. Lui, W. M. Lee, and C. Y. Cheng
Transforming Growth Factor {beta}3 Regulates the Dynamics of Sertoli Cell Tight Junctions Via the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1597 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. Xu, A. R. Beyer, W. H. Walker, and E. A. McGee
Developmental and Stage-Specific Expression of Smad2 and Smad3 in Rat Testis
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 192 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
D. J. Bernard
Editorial Commentary: SMAD Expression in the Testis Predicts Age- and Cell-Specific Responses to Activin and TGF{beta}
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 201 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Jiao, Y. Zhou, and B. L. M. Hogan
Identification of mZnf8, a Mouse Kruppel-Like Transcriptional Repressor, as a Novel Nuclear Interaction Partner of Smad1
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2002; 22(21): 7633 - 7644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Narula, S. Kilen, E. Ma, J. Kroeger, E. Goldberg, and T. K. Woodruff
Smad4 Overexpression Causes Germ Cell Ablation and Leydig Cell Hyperplasia in Transgenic Mice
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1723 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
T. R. Kumar, S. Varani, N. G. Wreford, N. M. Telfer, D. M. de Kretser, and M. M. Matzuk
Male Reproductive Phenotypes in Double Mutant Mice Lacking Both FSH{beta} and Activin Receptor IIA
Endocrinology, August 1, 2001; 142(8): 3512 - 3518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Lassus, R. Salovaara, L. A. Aaltonen, and R. Butzow
Allelic Analysis of Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Reveals Two Putative Tumor Suppressor Loci at 18q22-q23 Distal to SMAD4, SMAD2, and DCC
Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2001; 159(1): 35 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wang, R.-A.
Right arrow Articles by Zhao, G.-Q.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS