Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 1340-1346 (1999)
© 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Pronuclear Location Before the First Cell Division Determines Ploidy of Polyspermic Pig Embryos1

Yong-Mahn Hana,b, Wei-Hua Wanga, Lalantha R. Abeydeeraa, Anissa L. Petersena, Jae-Hwan Kima, Clifton Murphya, Billy N. Daya, and Randall S. Prather2,a

a Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65211-5300 b Korea Research Institute of Biosciences & Biotechnology, Taejon 305-600, Korea


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Polyspermy occurs frequently in the fertilization of mammalian eggs, but little is known about whether polyspermic eggs have developmental ability in vitro or in vivo. We previously reported that poly-pronuclear (PPN; 3 or more pronuclei) pig eggs developed normally to the blastocyst stage despite having fewer inner cell mass cell numbers as compared to blastocysts derived from two-pronuclear (2PN) eggs. Here it is shown that most PPN pig eggs have abnormal cleavage patterns (having 3 or more cells) in the first cell division and retarded development of pronuclei prior to syngamy as compared to 2PN eggs. Most blastocysts (14 of 18) that developed from PPN eggs showed abnormal ploidy (were haploid, triploid, and tetraploid) whereas 20 of 22 blastocysts derived from 2PN embryos were diploid. The size and morphology of most Day 40 fetuses that developed from PPN eggs appeared to be normal. Of 8 Day 40 fetuses analyzed, 1 was triploid (XXY) and another was a mosaic with both diploid (XX) and tetraploid cells (frequency of less than 10%, XXXX), and the others were diploid. Anomalies of chromosomal composition were not detected in these fetuses. Five live piglets and one dead piglet were born from two recipients of PPN eggs. It is proposed that not all pronuclei of PPN pig eggs participate in syngamy, resulting in diploid cells in the conceptus. Our data suggest that there are two types of pronuclei location in polyspermic pig eggs and that the resulting ploidy is determined at the zygote stage before the first cell division according to pronuclear location.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Polyspermy, or penetration of the egg cytoplasm by more than a single spermatozoon, is one of the principal anomalies of fertilization in placental mammals. The incidence of polyspermy in pigs ranges from 5% to 35% [14] and is even higher in pig eggs fertilized in vitro [58], although extensive attempts have been made to reduce polyspermy [9, 10]. It has been reported that polyspermy of pig eggs in vivo occurs primarily because abnormally high numbers of competent spermatozoa reach the egg surface more or less simultaneously [1113]. Polyspermy frequently occurs in human [1417] and bovine [1820] in vitro fertilization, having an incidence of nearly 10% among all fertilized oocytes. Polyspermic fertilization in mammals is generally considered pathological, invariably resulting in developmental failure of the zygote [21]. The penetration of the vitellus by several spermatozoa may lead to the formation of chromatin aggregates between adjoining sperm heads that have failed to decondense into accessory pronuclei [2, 22]. Polyploidy in humans mostly results in spontaneous abortion, but births of tetraploid or triploid children have been reported [2327]. These live births are characterized by severe malformations and multiple anomalies [2830]. Recently, it has been reported that polyspermic pig eggs develop to the blastocyst stage; however, they have fewer inner cell mass nuclei as compared to blastocysts derived from normal two-pronuclear (2PN) eggs [31]. Little information is available regarding the ability of polyspermic eggs to develop to term for two reasons: 1) the lack of experimental material and 2) lack of methods for isolating polyspermic eggs. In this study, polyspermic eggs were produced after in vitro maturation and fertilization of pig oocytes [32]. To isolate the surviving polyspermic eggs, the eggs were centrifuged to visualize pronuclei and subsequently classify them by pronuclear number. Thereafter, the experiments on development of polyspermic pig eggs could be performed. In addition, the movement of pronuclei in mammalian polyspermic eggs has not been reported; i.e., whether all pronuclei of polyspermic zygotes participate in syngamy prior to the first cell division. Here we show that some poly-pronuclear (PPN) pig eggs can develop quite far into gestation and to term, and that others may correct abnormal ploidy caused by more than 3 pronuclei.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Culture Media

Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). The medium used for oocyte maturation (IVM medium) was BSA-free North Carolina State University (NCSU) 23 medium [33] supplemented with 10% (v:v) porcine follicular fluid, 0.01 mg/ml epidermal growth factor, 0.1 mg/ml cysteine, 10 IU/ml each of eCG and hCG (Intervet America Inc., Millsboro, DE). The fertilization medium, designated modified Tris-buffered medium (mTBM), consisted of 113.1 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 7.5 mM CaCl2 2H2O, 20 mM Tris (crystallized free base; Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ), 11 mM glucose, 5 mM sodium pyruvate, and no antibiotics. Porcine follicular fluid was collected from follicles 3–6 mm in diameter, centrifuged at 1900 x g for 30 min at 4°C, filtered through 1.2-µm syringe filters (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI), and stored in aliquots at -20°C until use.

In Vitro Maturation (IVM)

The ovaries were collected from prepubertal gilts at a local slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory in 0.9% saline containing 75 mg/ml potassium penicillin G and 50 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate maintained at 25–30°C. Immature oocytes were obtained from follicles with a diameter of 3–6 mm using a 20-gauge needle connected to a 10-ml disposable syringe. Follicular contents were pooled into a 50-ml conical tube (Fisher Scientific) and allowed to sediment. Supernatant was discarded, and the sediment was washed with Tyrode's lactate (TL)-Hepes supplemented with 0.01% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) medium (TL-Hepes-PVA) using an Emcon filter (Reproduction Resources, Hebron, IL). Oocytes surrounded by a compact cumulus mass and having evenly granulated cytoplasm were selected and washed twice with approximately 3 ml of TL-Hepes-PVA medium. Then 50 oocytes were placed into 0.5 ml of IVM medium supplemented with eCG and hCG in each well of a Nunc 4-well multidish (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark). The medium was covered with warm paraffin oil (light mineral oil; Fisher) and equilibrated at 39°C, 5% CO2 in air for at least 2 h prior to use. After 20–22 h of maturation culture, oocytes were washed twice with TL-Hepes-PVA medium and then further cultured in 0.5 ml of the same IVM medium without hormonal supplements (eCG and hCG) for 20–22 h.

In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

After the end of the IVM period, IVF of pig oocytes was performed as previously described [32]. Briefly, the oocytes were treated with 0.1% hyaluronidase in NCSU 23 medium to remove cumulus cells and washed 3 times with mTBM containing 1 mM caffeine and 1 mg/ml BSA (A 7888). After washing, 35–40 denuded oocytes were placed into 50-µl drops of fertilization medium that had been covered with warm paraffin oil in a 35 x 10-mm2 polystyrene culture dish (Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ). The oocytes were incubated for about 30 min before spermatozoa were added. A frozen semen pellet was thawed and washed 3 times by centrifugation at 1900 x g for 4 min in Dulbecco's PBS (DPBS; Gibco Life Technologies Inc., Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA, 75 mg/ml potassium penicillin G, and 50 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate (pH 7.2). At the end of the washing procedure, the sperm pellet was resuspended in the fertilization medium of mTBM containing 1 mM caffeine and 1 mg/ml BSA. After appropriate dilution, 50 µl of the sperm suspension was added to 50 µl of the fertilization medium containing oocytes to give a final sperm concentration of 1.5 x 105 cells/ml. Oocytes were coincubated with spermatozoa for 5–6 h at 39°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air.

Classification of 2PN and PPN Eggs

Approximately 10 h after insemination, the eggs were centrifuged at 12 000 x g in a microcentrifuge (Fisher Scientific) for 10 min to stratify the cytoplasm and permit visualization of the pronuclei [34] and then washed twice with TL-Hepes medium supplemented with 1 mg/ml BSA (TL-Hepes-BSA medium). According to pronuclear numbers, the eggs were individually classified into 2PN and PPN eggs by use of a micromanipulator (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany) under x200 magnification on a warm plate (37°C). Unclear, unfertilized, and fragmented eggs were excluded from experimental groups. The validity of assignments of these eggs after classification was first evaluated by using an aceto orcein staining method. The accuracy rate for classification into 2PN and PPN eggs was 94.6% (105 of 111) and 96.8% (61 of 63), respectively. After classification, 2PN and PPN eggs were washed twice with the same medium and then cultured in 0.5 ml of NCSU medium supplemented with 4 mg/ml BSA (A8022) in each well of a Nunc 4-well multidish for approximately 12 h prior to embryo transfer.

Embryo Transfer of 2PN and PPN Pig Eggs

Experiments were conducted according to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Prepubertal gilts aged 165–180 days were injected with 1000 IU eCG followed by injection of 500 IU hCG 96 h later. The next morning they were observed for the onset of standing estrus, and gilts exhibiting estrus were then used as recipients. The first day of estrus was designated Day 1 of the cycle. The synchronized gilts (Day 2) were anesthetized by injection of 23 ml of 5% sodium thiopental (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) followed by 2–5% halothane (Halocarbon Laboratories, River Eagle, NJ) during surgery. The gilt was subjected to a midventral laparotomy, and the reproductive organs including uteri, oviducts, and ovaries were exteriorized. Eggs (30 to 35) at the 1-cell stage were transferred into one oviduct of the recipient to examine the in vivo development of the 2PN and PPN eggs.

Examination of Actin Filaments and Microtubules by Confocal Microscopy

In some replicates, embryos were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde in PBS at 4°C overnight. The embryos were first cultured in a blocking solution of PBS containing 2% BSA and 150 mM glycine for 30 min at room temperature. After washing for 1 h, the embryos were stained with 10 IU/ml rhodamine-phalloidin (for actin filaments) or 1 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-{alpha}-tubulin (for microtubules) for 1 h at 39°C in PBS-Tween 20 (0.1%, v:v). After 2 washes in PBS-Tween solution for 2 h at room temperature, the embryos were stained with 100 nM YO-Pro-1 iodide or 10 µg/ml propidium iodide for 5–10 min for detection of DNA. The embryos were mounted on glass slides and examined by confocal microscopy. Confocal microscopy was performed by using a Bio-Rad (Richmond, CA) MRC-600 equipped with a krypton argon ion. The laser scanning for an image was repeated 5 times for 5 sec to improve the signal-to-noise ratio.

Ploidy of Embryos and PPN-Derived Fetuses

Porcine embryonic fibroblasts were isolated from the whole body of each Day 40 fetus from which the head and internal organs had been cut off. The primary culture was in a 100-mm dish in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 39°C, 5% CO2 in air. The subcultures were seeded with 1–2 million cells and cultured for 2–3 days (at least a week for the triploid cells) until confluent. Fibroblasts of the 4th passage were cultured in DMEM containing colcemid (0.05 µg/ml) overnight, harvested, and treated in hypotonic solution (0.6% sodium citrate) for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were fixed with methanol:glacial acetic acid (3:1) twice and then dropped on glass slides. After air drying, the slides were stained with 5% (v:v) Giemsa for 5 min and washed with distilled water. Metaphase spreads were observed on a microscope under x600 magnification. In the case of embryo samples, blastocysts were cultured in NCSU medium containing colcemid (0.05 µg/ml) overnight. Thereafter, a single blastocyst was treated with 0.56% KCl for 5 min, directly mounted on a glass slide, and then fixed. The subsequent methods were the same as described above for fibroblasts. For blood samples, metaphase spreads were prepared as described by Verma and Babu [35]. Pig chromosomes were karyotyped according to standard karyotype of the domestic pig [36].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Development of PPN Pig Eggs

We previously reported that PPN pig eggs could develop to the blastocyst stage in vitro; however, they have a smaller number of inner cell mass nuclei than do blastocysts derived from 2PN eggs. These results led us to examine whether the PPN eggs continue to develop after implantation. Sixteen fetuses were obtained at 40 days after transfer from three animals that had received PPN eggs (Table 1). Implantation rate (17.0%, 17 of 100) of PPN eggs was similar to that (12.5%, 2 of 16) of 2PN eggs (Table 2). Moreover, the size and morphology of most PPN fetuses appeared to be normal in comparison to 2PN fetuses, although 2 fetuses appeared dead and were small (about 2.5 cm). In order to test whether PPN embryos can develop to term, pregnant recipients were allowed to continue beyond Day 40. While two recipients showed estrus on Day 60 (#95–1) and Day 97 (#99–1), respectively, two others (#203–7 and #242–7) delivered 5 live piglets and 1 stillborn piglet. The live piglets appeared to be normal at birth and, except for one that was crushed, are growing well at present. When histopathological, bacteriological, and serological tests were carried out on the stillborn piglet, there were no histological lesions. It was determined that the stillborn piglet suffocated before parturition as the lungs failed to float in formalin, and umbilical hematomas were not present. The results demonstrate that PPN pig eggs have in vivo developmental ability to late gestation and term.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Results after transfer of PPN pig eggs fertilized in vitro


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Profiles of Day 40 fetuses that developed from PPN pig eggs

Ploidy of PPN-Derived Embryos

Ploidy of PPN embryos was first investigated at the blastocyst stage. In contrast to 2PN embryos (2 of 22), most blastocysts (14 of 18) that developed from PPN eggs showed abnormal ploidy, i.e., they were haploid, triploid, and tetraploid (Table 3). Karyosyngamy of all pronuclei in the zygote stage was confirmed by confocal microscopy (Fig. 1). When a PPN egg was stained with anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibody and propidium iodide just after the disappearance of pronuclei membranes, only one set of metaphase chromosomes was observed. This embryo should be triploid.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Ploidy of 2PN and PPN embryos that developed to blastocysts



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Evidence of syngamy of pronuclei in a PPN egg just before the first cell division. All the pronuclei of a PPN egg were centrally located 24 h after insemination (A). Note that in this example each pronucleus has a single prominent nucleolus. Pronuclei development was observed at intervals of 1 h under an inverted microscope. When the membranes of the pronuclei disappeared, the egg was fixed and then stained with FITC-conjugated anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibody and propidium iodide. Only one set of metaphase chromosomes was detected by confocal microscopy (B)

To examine the ploidy of fetuses derived from PPN eggs, embryonic fibroblasts were isolated from each fetus and their ploidy was determined by cytological analysis. To validate our classification of eggs, more than 20 metaphase spreads for each fetus were observed under x600 magnification: one had triploid cells (XXY) and another was mixoploid with both diploid (XX) and tetraploid cells (frequency of less than 10%, XXXX), while the others had diploid cells (Table 2). Chromosome numbers on metaphase spreads of triploid and tetraploid cells were correct, representing 57 and 76, respectively. Thus, there appeared to be no other karyotypic anomalies in these fetuses (Fig. 2). It was hypothesized that if all the pronuclei of PPN zygotes were to participate in syngamy, a mixed sex (XX and XY) might be observed on the metaphase spreads from a single fetus because two sperm with different sex chromosomes might penetrate into the cytoplasm of a single oocyte. However, metaphase spreads of different sex were not detected in the diploid fetuses. The growth of fibroblast cells derived from the triploid fetus was slow in culture in vitro until confluent as compared to that of diploid cells (data not shown). Blood samples of 5 live piglets were examined, and all were found to be diploid. These results indicate that some polyploid eggs can develop to blastocysts or fetuses, suggesting indirectly that chromosomes from multiple pronuclei can participate in karyosyngamy in the zygote stage just before the first cell division.



View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Triploid (A) or tetraploid chromosomes (B) of PPN-derived fetuses. Fibroblast cells were established from each fetus, and their ploidy was then examined by a cytological method. Of 8 fetuses analyzed, 1 had triploid cells (XXY) and another was a mosaic with both diploid (XX) and tetraploid cells (frequency of less than 10%, XXXX), while the others had diploid cells. Number of metaphase chromosomes was correct in triploid (n = 57) or tetraploid cells (n = 76)

How Can PPN Pig Eggs Develop to Blastocysts or Fetuses?

A variety of ploidy was observed in PPN-derived embryos or fetuses (Tables 2 and 3). On the basis of these results, we hypothesized that PPN eggs might have a different cytoskeletal distribution due to additional sperm as compared to 2PN eggs. As an example, it is known that F-actin may be a marker for evaluating developmental competence in early embryos because actin filaments are related to the dynamic movement of organelles during early mammalian development [37]. While no differences in F-actin distribution between the 2 groups were detected (data not shown), the cleavage pattern of PPN eggs was different from that of 2PN eggs at 36 h after insemination (Table 4). The majority of 2PN eggs that had cleaved at that time were at the 2-cell stage (61.7%, 50 of 81) and almost all of the 2-cell eggs (90.0%, 45 of 50) had 2 nuclei, whereas most PPN eggs had divided into 3 or more cells. That is, the proportion of embryos with more than 3 cells in the PPN group (68.3%, 56 of 82) was higher (P < 0.001) than that for 2PN eggs (38.3%, 31 of 81). Moreover, PPN eggs that divided into 3 or more cells in the main had 3 or more nuclei. Thus, the results indicated that most PPN pig eggs showed abnormal cleavage at the first cell division.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Nuclei numbers of the cleaved eggs at 36 hours after insemination.a

The next question was how the PPN zygotes make diploid or mutiploid cells. If a PPN zygote were to develop to a triploid fetus as shown in Table 2, 3 pronuclei of the zygote should participate in syngamy prior to the first cell division. To determine this, the location (development) of pronuclei in PPN eggs was examined at 24 h after insemination. Approximately half of 2PN zygotes (46%, 24 of 52) had already developed to metaphase and cleaved eggs, while most PPN zygotes (88%, 43 of 49) still had pronuclei (Fig. 3). It was found that there were two different types of distribution of pronuclei in the PPN zygotes. In the first, all the pronuclei progressed to the center of the oocyte. In the second, 1 female and 1 male pronucleus were centrally located and the other male pronucleus was located eccentrically. These different types of pronuclear location in PPN eggs were detected again by confocal microscopy after treatment with anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibody and propidium iodide (Fig. 4). Microtubules were distributed around pronuclei and spindles. As shown in Figure 4E, 3 pronuclei of the egg were located in the center. Another type is shown in Figure 4F; i.e., 1 male and 1 female pronucleus participated in syngamy, and the other pronucleus was located eccentrically. One fertilized egg had one telophase chromosome set just before the first cell division, while 1 male pronucleus remained in the egg (Fig. 4G). This embryo might have been dividing into 3 cells. Another zygote had one set of chromatin in anaphase and one in telophase (Fig. 4H), suggesting that the telophase (left) was derived from syngamy and the anaphase (right) from the other male pronucleus. This embryo probably would divide into 4 cells. Thus, the abnormal nuclear divisions could explain how some PPN pig eggs divided into more than 3 cells at the first cleavage (Table 4). These results were also consistent with karyotypes of PPN-derived blastocysts or fetuses that showed a variety of karyotypes, i.e., haploid, diploid, triploid, and tetraploid.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Pronuclear development of 2PN and PPN eggs at 24 h after insemination. The experiments were repeated 3 times



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Development of pronuclei in 2PN and PPN pig zygotes. The eggs were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde 24 h after insemination and treated with FITC-conjugated anti-{alpha}-tubulin antibody and propidium iodide. The microtubule distribution and DNA were detected by confocal microscopy. Panels A–D and E–H eggs show 2PN and PPN zygotes, respectively. Microtubules were distributed in the cytoplasm around pronuclei (A, E, and F) at pronuclear stage and in the spindles at metaphase (B) or telophase (C, D, G, and H) just before the first cell division


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In Vivo Development of PPN Pig Eggs

To our knowledge, the present study is the first detailed report on in vivo development of early mammalian polyspermic embryos. Pig oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro could develop to blastocysts after transfer of fertilized oocytes to the oviduct [3841], and under in vitro culture conditions [32, 42, 43], although the percentage that developed to the blastocyst stage was still low. One reason for this low developmental frequency was thought to be the high incidence of polyspermy [44, 45]. However, we previously reported that PPN eggs developed to the blastocyst stage at a developmental rate similar to that of normal (2PN) eggs [31]. When the subsequent developmental ability of PPN embryos was investigated, most Day 40 fetuses appeared to be normal in size and morphology compared to 2PN-derived fetuses, although 2 fetuses appeared dead and were small (Table 2). Moreover, live piglets were born from recipients of PPN eggs (Table 1). Thus, the present study demonstrates that some PPN pig eggs develop normally to term.

Ploidy of PPN-Derived Embryos

In humans, triploid fetuses are usually retarded in growth and have severe anatomic defects of the head, heart, and extremities [46]. The development of rat triploid embryos is reported to be identical to that of diploid embryos up to about 10 days of gestation [47]. Rabbit triploid embryos are described as being morphologically normal at 15 days of gestation and retarded by only about 1 day compared to normal diploid embryos [48]. Diandric triploid mouse embryos produced by nuclear manipulation are capable of surviving up to the forelimb bud stage and possess about 25 pairs of somites. They appear to be morphologically normal but are considerably smaller than fertilized embryos analyzed at similar stages of development [49, 50]. The reduction in size of postimplantation triploid embryos compared with developmentally matched controls may result from their reduced cell number, possibly due to their slowed cleavage rate during the preimplantation period [51]. In the present study, a triploid pig fetus at Day 40 of gestation appeared to be morphologically normal in size, although the growth of fibroblast cells derived from the fetus was slow in culture in vitro until confluence as compared to that of diploid cells. Another fetus was a mosaic of diploid and tetraploid nuclei (Table 2). Diploid and tetraploid mosaicism has been observed in the trophoblasts of pigs [52] and sheep [53] after Day 10 in vivo. Mosaic embryos may develop to fetuses if polyploid cells enter the trophoblast lineage and participate in the formation of extraembryonic structures. Live piglets with diploid nuclei developed from PPN eggs, although some blastocysts and fetuses derived from PPN embryos were multiploid (Tables 2 and 3). Thus, the ploidy of PPN embryos may change during early embryonic development.

Models of Embryonic Development of PPN Pig Eggs

Although more experiments are needed to test these hypotheses, some possible mechanisms in relation to embryonic development of polyspermic pig eggs are proposed. First, all the pronuclei of a PPN egg participate at the first cleavage, forming two identical daughter cells that then develop to blastocysts and fetuses (Fig. 5, A). This hypothesis was illustrated by the appearance of triploid or tetraploid cells in blastocysts or fibroblasts derived from PPN pig eggs (Tables 2 and 3, and Fig. 2). Second, all the pronuclei participate in syngamy, but the egg divides into 3 or 4 cells like polyspermic sea urchin eggs. We did not find any explicit data supporting this mechanism, although most PPN eggs divided into eggs of 3 or more cells at the first cleavage (Table 4). Kola et al. [15] reported that 62% (18 of 29) of tripronuclear human zygotes cleaved directly to 3-cell embryos at the first cleavage division and that all of these embryos examined by chromosomal analysis had a highly abnormal chromosome composition. In the present study, however, anomalies of chromosome composition, other than ploidy, were not detected in fetuses that developed from PPN pig eggs. Interestingly, the first mitotic division after fertilization is controlled by the sperm centriole, which must be present for proper embryo cleavage [5456]. In the sea urchin, fertilization by two sperm results in a triploid nucleus. Since the sperm centriole divides to form the two poles of a miotic apparatus, instead of a bipolar mitotic spindle separating the chromosomes into 2 cells, the triploid chromosomes would divide into as many as 4 cells. Third, both a female and a male pronucleus of a PPN zygote will participate in cleavage and the other male pronucleus may divide separately, giving rise to a mosaic of 1 haploid and 2 diploid cells (Fig. 5, C) or 2 haploid and 2 diploid cells (Fig. 5, D). Thereafter, if 1 or more haploid cells die later during embryo development, this embryo will become diploid and then subsequently develop to term. Haploid/diploid mosaic embryos were rarely shown in sheep and were ascribed to polyspermic fertilization [57, 58]. However, it is unknown whether the haploid cell(s) degenerates later during embryogenesis, or even whether it fuses with one of the blastomeres. The fate of these haploid cells in polyspermic embryos may be elucidated if the molecular markers specific for pig sperm are utilized. In the yolky eggs of certain birds, reptiles, and salamanders, several sperm enter the egg cytoplasm at fertilization. Through an unknown mechanism, all but one of these sperm are induced to disintegrate in the cytoplasm after fusion of the egg pronucleus with 1 of the sperm pronuclei [59]. Whatever the mechanism, only 1 haploid sperm nucleus is allowed to fuse with the haploid nucleus of the egg. Here, we propose that the developmental mechanism of PPN pig eggs may be analogous to that of yolky eggs. The results for live piglets with diploid cells support the third model. The present study suggests that the two types of pronuclear location in polyspermic pig eggs result in embryos that have differing ploidy. This correction of ploidy can likely occur at the 1-cell stage before the first cell division.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. A diagram representing the developmental mechanisms of PPN pig eggs. There were two types of pronuclei location in the PPN eggs. In one type (I), all the pronuclei were centrally located. In the other (II), 1 female and 1 male pronucleus were close, but the other was located eccentrically. In type I fertilizations, either the embryo developed as a triploid (A) or correct ploidy was established in some cells (B) and development continued. Alternatively, in type II fertilizations, a diploid/aneuploid mosaic was established with division to the 3- or 4-cell stage directly from the 1-cell stage. The present study suggests that the two types of pronuclear location result in embryos that have different ploidy


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 The material is based upon work supported as a part of the National Cooperative Program on Non-Human In Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Development and was funded by the NICHD through cooperative agreement HD34588, and is a contribution from the Missouri Agricultural Experiments Station Journal Series No. 12,831. Back

2 Correspondence: Randall S. Prather, 920 East Campus Drive, Room 162, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211-5300. FAX: 573 884 7827; pratherr{at}missouri.edu Back

Accepted: June 25, 1999.

Received: April 26, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hancock JL. Polyspermy of pig ova. Anim Prod 1959; 1:103–106.
  2. Hunter RHF. The effects of delayed insemination on fertilization and early cleavage in the pig. J Reprod Fertil 1967; 13:133–147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hunter RHF. Local action of progesterone leading to polyspermic fertilization in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1972; 31:433–444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hunter RHF. Polyspermic fertilisation in pigs after tubal deposition of excessive numbers of spermatozoa. J Exp Zool 1973; 183:57–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Nagai T, Niwa K, Iritani A. Effect of sperm concentration during preincubation in a defined medium on fertilization in vitro of pig follicular oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 70:271–275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wang WH, Okuda K, Niwa K. In vitro penetration of pig oocytes matured in culture by frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1991; 93:491–499.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Okuda K, Niwa K. Penetration of porcine oocytes during maturation in vitro by cryopreserved, ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:510–515.[Abstract]
  8. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Cantley TC, Day BN. Effects of oocyte maturation media on development of pig embryos produced by in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 111:101–108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Hunter RHF, Nichol R. Capacitation potential of the fallopian tube: a study involving surgical insemination and the subsequent incidence of polyspermy. Gamete Res 1988; 21:255–266.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Hunter RHF. Ovarian control of very low sperm/egg ratios at the commencement of mammalian fertilisation to avoid polyspermy. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 44:417–422.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Day BN, Polge C. Effects of progesterone on fertilization and egg transport in the pig. J Reprod Fertil 1968; 17:227–230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hunter RHF, Leglise PC. Polyspermic fertilization following tubal surgery in pigs, with particular reference to the role of the isthmus. J Reprod Fertil 1971; 24:233–246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Polge C. Fertilization in the pig and horse. J Reprod Fertil 1978; 54:461–470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Rudak E, Dor J, Mashiach S, Nebel L, Goldman B. Chromosome analysis of multipronuclear human oocytes fertilized in vitro. Fertil Steril 1984; 41:538–545.[Medline]
  15. Kola I, Trounson A, Dawson G, Rogers P. Tripronuclear human oocytes: altered cleavage patterns and subsequent karyotypic analysis of embryos. Biol Reprod 1987; 37:395–401.[Abstract]
  16. Plachot M, Crozet N. Fertilization abnormalities in human in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod Suppl 1992; 7:89–94.
  17. Yie SM, Collins JA, Daya S, Hughes E, Sagle M, Younglai EV. Polyploidy and failed fertilization in in-vitro fertilization are related to patient's age and gamete quality. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:614–617.
  18. Iwasaki S, Shioya Y, Masuda H, Hanada A, Nakahara T. Incidence of chromosomal anomalies in early bovine embryos derived from in vitro fertilization. Gamete Res 1989; 22:83–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Iwasaki S, Hamano S, Kuwayama M, Yamashita M, Ushijima H, Nagaoka S, Nakahara T. Developmental changes in the incidence of chromosome anomalies of bovine embryos fertilized in vitro. J Exp Zool 1992; 261:70–85.
  20. Kawarsky SJ, Basrur PK, Stubbings RB, Hansen PJ, King WA. Chromosomal abnormalities in bovine embryos and their influence on development. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:53–59.[Abstract]
  21. Austin CR. Fertilisation and transport of the ovum: In: Hartman CG (ed.), Mechanism Concerned with Conception. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1963: 285–320.
  22. Hunter RHF. Sperm-egg interactions in the pigs: monospermy, extensive polyspermy, and the formation of chromatin aggregates. J Anat 1976; 122:43–59.[Medline]
  23. Uchida IA, Freeman VC. Triploidy and chromosomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:65–69.[Medline]
  24. Sherard J, Bean C, Bove B, Delduca V, Esterly KL, Kavish HJ, Munshi G, Reamer JF, Suazo G, Wilmoth D, Dahlke MB, Weiss C, Borgaonkar DS. Long survival in a 69XXY triploid male. Am J Med Genet 1986; 25:307–312.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Shiono H, Azumi J, Fujiwara M, Yamajaki H, Kikuchi K. Tetraploidy in a 15-month old girl. Am J Med Genet 1988; 29:543–547.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Roberts HE, Saxe DF, Muralidharan K, Coleman KB, Zacharias JF, Fernhoff PM. Unique mosaicism of tetraploidy and trisomy 8: clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular findings in a live-born infant. Am J Med Genet 1996; 62:243–246.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Dean J, Cohen G, Kemp J, Robson L, Tembe V, Hasselaar J, Webster B, Lammi A, Smith A. Karyotype 69, XXX/47, XX, +15 in a 2–1/2 year old child. J Med Genet 1997; 34:246–249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pitt D, Leversha M, Sinfield C, Campbell P, Anderson R, Bryan D, Rogers J. Tetraploidy in a liveborn infant with spina bifida and other anomalies. J Med Genet 1981; 18:309–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Doshi N, Surti U, Szulman AE. Morphologic anomalies in triploid liveborn fetuses. Hum Pathol 1983; 14:716–723.[Medline]
  30. Kjaer I, Keeling JW, Smith NM, Hansen BF. Pattern of malformations in the axial skeleton in human triploid fetuses. Am J Med Genet 1997; 72:216–221.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Han YM, Abeydeera LR, Kim JH, Day BN, Moon HB, Prather RS. Growth retardation of inner cell mass cells in polyspermic pig embryos produced in vitro. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1110–1113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Abeydeera LR, Day BN. Fertilization and subsequent development in vitro of pig oocytes inseminated in a modified Tris-buffered medium with frozen-thawed ejaculated spermatozoa. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:729–734.[Abstract]
  33. Petters RM, Wells KD. Culture of pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48:61–73.[Medline]
  34. Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt DJ, Ebert KM, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL. Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep and pigs by microinjection. Nature 1985; 315:680–683.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Verma RS, Babu A. Human Chromosomes: Manual of Basic Techniques. New York: Pergamon Press; 1989: 6–9.
  36. Gustavsson I. Standard karyotype of the domestic pig. Hereditas 1988; 109:151–157.[Medline]
  37. Barnett DK, Clayton MK, Kimura J, Bavister BD. Glucose and phosphate toxicity in hamster preimplantation embryos involves disruption of cellular organization, including distribution of active mitochondria. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 48:227–237.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Mattioli M, Bacci ML, Galeati G, Seren E. Developmental competence of pig oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. Theriogenology 1989; 46:1201–1207.[CrossRef]
  39. Yoshida M, Ishigaki K, Kawagishi H. Blastocyst formation by pig embryos resulting from in vitro fertilization of oocytes matured in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 88:1–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Funahashi H, Stumpf TT, Terlouw SL, Cantley T, Rieke A, Day BN. Developmental ability of pig oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro. Theriogenology 1994; 41:1425–1433.
  41. Machaty Z, Day BN, Prather RS. Development of early porcine embryos in vitro and in vivo. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:451–455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Funahashi H, Cantley TC, Stumpf TT, Terlouw S, Day BN. In vitro development of in vitro-matured porcine oocytes following chemical activation or in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:1072–1077.[Abstract]
  43. Rath D, Niemann H, Torres CRL. In vitro development to blastocysts of early pig embryos produced in vivo and in vitro. Theriogenology 1996; 43:913–921.[CrossRef]
  44. Nagai T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, Shioya Y, Kuwayama M, Fukushima M, Iwasaki S, Hanada A. In-vitro fertilization of pig oocytes by frozen boar spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 84:585–591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Niwa K. Effectiveness of in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization techniques in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48:49–59.[Medline]
  46. Szulman AE, Philippe E, Boue JG, Boue A. Human triploidy: association with partial hydatidiform moles and nonmolar conceptuses. Hum Pathol 1981; 12:1016–1021.[Medline]
  47. Piko L, Bomsel-Helmreich O. Triploid rat embryos and other chromosomal deviants after colchicine treatment and polyspermy. Nature 1960; 186:737–739.[Medline]
  48. Bomsel-Helmreich O. Fate of heteroploid embryos. Adv Biosci 1971; 6:381–403.
  49. Kaufman MH, Lee KKH, Speirs S. Influence of diandric and digynic triploid genotypes on early mouse embryogenesis. Development 1989; 105:137–145.[Abstract]
  50. Kaufman MH. New insights into triploidy and tetraploidy, from an analysis of model systems for these conditions. Hum Reprod 1991; 6:8–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Henery CC, Kaufman MH. Cleavage rate of diandric triploid mouse embryos during the preimplantation period. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 32:251–258.[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Long SE, Williams CV. A comparison of the chromosome complement of inner cell mass and trophoblast cells in Day-10 pig embryos. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 66:645–648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Murray JD, Moran C, Boland MP, Nancarrow CD, Sutton R, Hoskinson RM, Scaramuzzi RJ. Polyploid cells in blastocysts and early fetuses from Australian Merino sheep. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 78:439–446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Palermo G, Munne S, Cohen J. The human zygote inherits its mitotic potential from the male gamete. Hum Reprod 1994; 9:1220–1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Asch R, Simerly C, Ord T, Ord VA, Shatten G. The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes which failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1897–1906.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kim NH, Lee JW, Jun SH, Lee HT, Chung KS. Fertilization of porcine oocytes following intracytoplasmic spermatozoon or isolated sperm head injection. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 51:436–444.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Long SE, Williams CV. Frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in early of the domestic sheep (Ovis aries). J Reprod Fertil 1980; 58:197–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Murray JD, Boland MP, Moran C, Sutton R, Nancarrow CD, Scaramuzzi RJ, Hoskinson RM. Occurrence of haploid and haploid/diploid mosaic embryos in untreated and androstenedione-immune Australian Merino sheep. J Reprod Fertil 1985; 74:551–555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Elinson RP. Fertilization in amphibians: the ancestry of the block to polyspermy. Int Rev Cytol 1986; 101:59–100.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Somfai, M. Ozawa, J. Noguchi, H. Kaneko, M. Nakai, N. Maedomari, J. Ito, N. Kashiwazaki, T. Nagai, and K. Kikuchi
Live Piglets Derived from In Vitro-Produced Zygotes Vitrified at the Pronuclear Stage
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2009; 80(1): 42 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. J Booth, T. J Watson, and H. J Leese
Prediction of Porcine Blastocyst Formation Using Morphological, Kinetic, and Amino Acid Depletion and Appearance Criteria Determined During the Early Cleavage of In Vitro-Produced Embryos
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 765 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Hao, N. Mathialagan, E. Walters, J. Mao, L. Lai, D. Becker, W. Li, J. Critser, and R. S. Prather
Osteopontin Reduces Polyspermy During In Vitro Fertilization of Porcine Oocytes
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2006; 75(5): 726 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Zannoni, M. Spinaci, C. Bernardini, M. L. Bacci, E. Seren, M. Mattioli, and M. Forni
DNase I activity in pig MII oocytes: implications in transgenesis.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. Bjerregaard, C. Wrenzycki, F. Strejcek, J. Laurincik, P. Holm, R. L. Ochs, C. Rosenkranz, H. Callesen, D. Rath, H. Niemann, et al.
Expression of Nucleolar-Related Proteins in Porcine Preimplantation Embryos Produced In Vivo and In Vitro
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2004; 70(4): 867 - 876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. S. Sherrer, T. J. Rathbun, and D. L. Davis
Fertilization and blastocyst development in oocytes obtained from prepubertal and adult pigs
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 102 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.C. McCauley, W.C. Buhi, G.M. Wu, J. Mao, J.N Caamano, B.A. Didion, and B.N. Day
Oviduct-Specific Glycoprotein Modulates Sperm-Zona Binding and Improves Efficiency of Porcine Fertilization In Vitro
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 828 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Q.-Y. Sun, G.-M. Wu, L. Lai, A. Bonk, R. Cabot, K.-W. Park, B. N. Day, R. S. Prather, and H. Schatten
Regulation of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Phosphorylation, Microtubule Organization, Chromatin Behavior, and Cell Cycle Progression by Protein Phosphatases During Pig Oocyte Maturation and Fertilization In Vitro
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 580 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Viuff, P. J.M. Hendriksen, P. L.A.M. Vos, S. J. Dieleman, B. M. Bibby, T. Greve, P. Hyttel, and P. D. Thomsen
Chromosomal Abnormalities and Developmental Kinetics in In Vivo-Developed Cattle Embryos at Days 2 to 5 after Ovulation
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 204 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Q.-Y. Sun, L. Lai, K.-W. Park, B. Kühholzer, R. S. Prather, and H. Schatten
Dynamic Events Are Differently Mediated by Microfilaments, Microtubules, and Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase During Porcine Oocyte Maturation and Fertilization In Vitro
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 879 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Han, Y.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Prather, R. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS