Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.
Biology of Reproduction 61, 1431-1438 (1999)
©Copyright 1999 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Sialomucin Complex (Muc4) Expression in the Rat Female Reproductive Tract1

Nebila Idrisa, and Kermit L. Carraway2,a

a Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33101


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated the presence of sialomucin complex (SMC)/Muc4 covering the rat uterine luminal epithelium. SMC/Muc4 expression in the uterus is regulated by estrogen and progesterone and lost at the time of receptivity. In contrast to this hormonal regulation at the uterine luminal surface, SMC/Muc4 in the uterine glandular epithelium, oviduct, cervix, and vagina was constitutively expressed at all stages of the estrous cycle. Furthermore, SMC was expressed in the cervix and vagina of the ovariectomized rat, even though it is not found in the uterine luminal epithelium. Both soluble and membrane-bound forms of SMC were present in these tissues. Immunohistochemical analyses showed distinctive localization patterns of SMC in the various tissues during the estrous cycle. Moreover, the previously unreported expression of SMC/Muc4 in the isthmus, ampulla, and infundibulum of the oviduct suggests potential functions in gamete development. These results indicate that SMC/Muc4 is expressed in most tissues of the female reproductive tract, in which it may have multiple functions. However, hormonal regulation appears to be restricted to the uterine luminal epithelium.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The luminal surface of the female reproductive tract is covered by mucins, which provide lubrication and protection from microbial invasion and infection [1]. Mucins are a heterogeneous group of glycoproteins that can be characterized as secretory or membrane on the basis of their physical properties or sequences [2]. Membrane mucins, which are heavily glycosylated, extend above the luminal surface and provide a selective barrier to protect the mucosal surface on which they are located [36].

Recent studies of the female reproductive tract have demonstrated the production of multiple mucins with different patterns of expression and possible multiple functions in different tissues [79]. In the distal reproductive tract, cervical mucins not only create a barrier to sperm and pathogen entrance to the endometrium but also provide a protective covering for the vaginal epithelium. In humans, the rheologic and viscoelastic properties of human cervical mucus have been shown to vary during the menstrual cycle in a hormone-dependent manner [10]. MUC4 and MUC5B are reported to be the major mucin genes expressed by the endocervix [11]. Mucins also cover the surface of the uterine epithelium [12, 13]. In the rodent uterus, the expression of the membrane mucins Muc1 and Muc4 (sialomucin complex) is regulated by ovarian hormones during the estrous cycle. In the normal cycling rodent, membrane mucin expression in the uterus changes during the estrous cycle, increasing with high levels of estrogen in the plasma and decreasing at times that correspond with high plasma progesterone levels [9, 12].

Sialomucin complex (SMC/Muc4) is one of two membrane mucins widely expressed in various epithelia [14]. It is a heterodimeric glycoprotein that was originally isolated and characterized from highly metastatic 13762 rat mammary adenocarcinoma ascites tumor cells [15]. SMC/Muc4 is composed of a highly O-glycosylated mucin subunit ASGP-1 [16] noncovalently attached to the membrane via a transmembrane subunit ASGP-2 [17], which contains two epidermal growth factor-like sequences [18]. Since SMC is a highly O-glycosylated protein with rigid, elongated structures projecting above the luminal cell surface, it has been hypothesized that it acts as a protective anti-adhesive and anti-recognition agent at the cell surface [6]. The expression of SMC has been shown to prevent cell-cell adhesion and cell-matrix interaction when transfected into melanoma cells [6]. Recent studies from our laboratory have shown that SMC/Muc4 is expressed in many epithelia, including the trachea [19, 20], colon [19], lactating mammary gland [19, 21], and cornea and conjunctiva [22].

The potential protective function of apical cell surface mucins presents a dilemma in the uterus, since the presence of mucins inhibits cell-cell interactions necessary for blastocyst implantation [13]. Mucins must be lost from the surface to achieve the required adhesive interactions between the apical plasma membrane of trophoblast cells of the blastocyst and the apical plasma membrane of the uterine epithelium that are necessary for implantation [2328]. SMC is expressed in the pregnant rat uterus between Days 1 and 4 postcoitus, but it disappears abruptly during Day 5, at the time of onset of the receptive period [12]. These results indicate that SMC may act as a barrier to prevent implantation in the prereceptive period, similar to the mechanism proposed for Muc1 in the rat [29]. SMC must be lost from the apical surface of the rat uterine lining in order to generate the receptive state for uterine implantation.

These observations on the expression of SMC in the rat uterus and its changes during pregnancy raise the question of what happens in other regions of the female reproductive tract, such as the cervix and vagina, that are more accessible and vulnerable to infection. SMC might be regulated differently in these tissues, since there is no requirement for down-regulation for blastocyst implantation. However, these tissues do undergo physiological and structural changes that are sensitive to the estrous cycle. The present study demonstrates the expression of SMC/Muc4 in the oviduct, cervix, and vagina at similar levels throughout the estrous cycle. Moreover, SMC expression can also be observed in the cervix and vagina in ovariectomized rats, in which uterine expression is lost. These results indicate that regulation of SMC expression in these tissues is different from that in the uterus.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Antibodies

Rabbit polyclonal antisera directed against intact rat tumor ASGP-2 [30] and the COOH-terminal cytoplasmic domain of ASGP-2 (anti-C-pep) [19] were used for immunoprecipitations. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) 4F12 directed against the N-terminus of ASGP-2 [19] was used for immunoblotting and immunohistochemical staining. Goat anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Biotinylated goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies and avidin-HRP conjugate were purchased from Dako (Carpinteria, CA). Protein A agarose, estradiol-17ß, progesterone, diaminobenzidine (DAB), and general laboratory chemicals were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO).

Tissue Collection and Preparation

Experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Adult Fischer 344 rats (6–8 wk old; Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were housed 2 per cage in a controlled environment. Before animals were killed, the estrous cycle was staged by performing vaginal smears. The determination of the stage of the cycle was later confirmed by histological changes in the uterine and vaginal epithelia that occur normally in cycling rats. Oviduct, uterus, cervix, and vagina were dissected from adult Fischer 344 rats and used for either immunoblotting, immunoprecipitations, or immunostaining. For immunoblotting and immunoprecipitations, the tissues were pulverized with a mortar and pestle in liquid N2 and stored as a powder at -80°C. For immunoblotting, tissue powders were solubilized in a 1% SDS buffer. For quantitation of total protein, solubilized protein was boiled and clarified by centrifugation at 12 000 x g. Protein concentrations were determined using the Modified Lowry Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). For immunoprecipitations, tissue powders were solubilized in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0) and homogenized with a probe sonicator. The lysates were centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min, and the supernate (2S) was added to protein A-agarose-bound antiserum. For immunostaining, tissues were fixed in methacarn (60% methanol, 30% inhibsol, 10% acetic acid) overnight and embedded in paraffin [31].

Ovariectomized rats (3 per group) were used for hormone studies. The rats were injected s.c. with 2.5 µg of estradiol-17ß and 4 mg of progesterone in 0.2 ml sesame oil for 3 consecutive days. Control animals received only sesame oil. On the fourth day, the uterus, cervix, and vagina were harvested from each animal and used for immunoblotting and immunostaining.

Immunoblotting

SDS-PAGE was performed under reducing conditions using 6% polyacrylamide gels and the mini-Protean II system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins (10 µg) were resolved on SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose filters, which were subsequently blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween 20. After a 1-h incubation in primary antibody diluted 1:10 000 in 1% BSA/Tris-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween 20, the filters were incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG diluted 1:14 000. The signal was detected with the Renaissance Enhanced Chemiluminescence Kit (DuPont NEN, Boston, MA).

Immunoprecipitations

Anti-ASGP-2 and anti-C-pep immunoprecipitations were performed with 20 µl of protein A-agarose and 20 µl of antiserum. All immunoprecipitations were rotated overnight at 4°C and washed six times for 10 min each in RIPA. Bound proteins were released by boiling in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with 4F12 mAb.

Uterine Rinse SMC

Uterine horns, cervix, and vagina were dissected from rats that were in the estrous or diestrous stage (3 each) and rinsed briefly in PBS. The tissues were cut longitudinally and opened to expose the luminal epithelium. Sequential rinses with single-strength PBS (3 times) and double-strength PBS, 1.5 M urea, and 0.05% Triton X-100 in single-strength PBS (2 times each) were performed by adding 2 ml of the solution to a 15-ml conical tube containing the slit tissues. After gentle rocking for 1 min, the solution was collected. All rinses were reduced in volume to 0.1 ml by centrifugation in Centricon filters (Amicon, Beverly, MA) with a 500-kDa cut-off. The volumes were then brought to 2 ml with 0.05% Triton X-100 in single-strength PBS, and the cycle was repeated 3 times. The rinsed tissues were processed to give a 2S fraction. All samples were then immunoprecipitated with anti-ASGP-2, and the precipitations were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with 4F12 mAb.

Immunostaining

Paraffin blocks containing the various regions of the female reproductive tract were sectioned (5 µm thick) and routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining was performed by first dewaxing the sections in xylene and dehydrating in absolute ethanol. Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by incubating in methanol-H2O2 for 20 min. The sections were washed in tap water for 5 min and then incubated for 1 h in primary antibody (anti-ASGP-2 4F12 mAb) diluted 1:600 in 0.5% BSA in PBS. The sections were washed in PBS for 5 min and incubated for 45 min in biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody diluted 1:400 in 0.5% BSA in PBS. After a 5-min wash in PBS, the sections were incubated for 45 min in avidin-HRP diluted 1:400 in 0.05 Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. The sections were washed in PBS, in 0.05 Tris-HCl, pH 7.4 (5 min each), then incubated in DAB substrate for 7 min, and subsequently washed in water and counterstained in hematoxylin for 15 sec. The sections were washed in water, dehydrated with ethanol, cleared in xylene, and mounted with Permount (Fisher Chemicals, Pittsburgh, PA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
SMC/Muc4 in Vagina, Cervix, and Oviduct

Previous work in our laboratory demonstrated that SMC/Muc4 is expressed in the rat uterus in a hormonally regulated manner [12]. The presence of SMC in the uterus raises the possibility that SMC/Muc4 provides a protective mechanism in other regions of the female reproductive tract that are accessible and vulnerable to infection. In an initial effort to determine which other tissues of the female reproductive tract express SMC/Muc4, lysates were prepared from the ovaries, oviduct, uterus, cervix, and vagina of rats that were in the estrous stage, which had been previously shown to have the highest level of expression during the estrous cycle [12]. The lysates were analyzed by Western blotting using the mAb 4F12, which recognizes rat ASGP-2 (Fig. 1). The results indicated that a considerably higher level of SMC/Muc4 was present in the cervix and vagina than in the uterus (Fig. 1). A much lower level of SMC/Muc4 was present in the oviduct, and SMC/Muc4 was not observed in the ovaries (Fig. 1).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Immunoblot analyses of SMC/Muc4 in different tissues of the female reproductive tract of rats in estrous (A) and diestrous stages (B). Total protein (10 µg/lane) from ovaries (O), oviduct (F), uterus (U), cervix (C), and vagina (V) on SDS-PAGE was immunoblotted using anti-ASGP-2 mAb 4F12. The tissues used were pooled from 3 rats each and are representative of other experiments done on different combinations of tissue samples

Lack of Variation of Cervical and Vaginal SMC/Muc4 During the Estrous Cycle

In the uterus, the level of SMC in the rat varies significantly during the estrous cycle, with the highest level during the estrous stage [12]. SMC is also lost immediately prior to implantation of the blastocyst from the uterine surface. Thus, it was of interest to know whether there are also variations in expression of SMC in the more accessible lower regions of the female reproductive tract. As shown in Figure 1B, no substantial differences were observed in the expression levels of SMC/Muc4 in the cervix and vagina of rats between the estrous and diestrous stages.

Soluble Form of SMC/Muc4

In most normal tissues that express SMC/Muc4, including the uterus [12], the glycoprotein complex is found in both membrane and soluble forms [14]. To determine which form(s) of SMC/Muc4 is present in the cervix and vagina, a sequential immunoprecipitation analysis was performed on tissue homogenates of rats that were in either the estrous or the diestrous stage. Tissue homogenates were immunoprecipitated with anti-C-pep and with anti-ASGP-2 antisera, the former recognizing the membrane form of SMC via the COOH-terminus of ASGP-2. Between 40% and 60% of SMC/Muc4 protein was immunoprecipitated by the anti-C-pep antisera in the vagina (Fig. 2) and cervix (data not shown) of rats in the estrous stage, calculated as described previously [12, 20]. Consistent with this estimate, approximately 40% of SMC was removed from the vaginal lumen by sequentially rinsing slit vaginal canals with various solutions for 1 min each (Fig. 3). The mild conditions and short rinse times were used to distinguish loosely bound SMC from the membrane-bound SMC, which cannot be easily washed from the luminal surface. Most of the SMC that could be rinsed from the vagina (Fig. 3) and cervix (data not shown) without disrupting cell or membrane structures was removed during the two rinses with isotonic saline, indicating that it was loosely bound, as in the uterus [12] and trachea [20]. These results indicated that SMC was present in both nonmembrane and transmembrane forms on the apical surface of cervical and vaginal epithelia, and that the soluble form was loosely adsorbed to the luminal surface—similar to results reported previously for the uterus [12], trachea [20], and cornea [21].



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Analysis of SMC/Muc4 membrane and soluble forms in rat vagina by sequential immunoprecipitation. Vaginal homogenate was subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-ASGP-2 antibody (total SMC) or with anti-C-pep antibody (membrane SMC), which recognizes the carboxyl terminal cytoplasmic domain of ASGP-2. The supernatant from the anti-C-pep immunoprecipitation was divided into two equal aliquots. One aliquot was further immunoprecipitated with polyclonal anti-ASGP-2 (soluble form, labeled alpha-C-pep, alpha-ASGP-2), and the other was immunoprecipitated with anti-C-pep (alpha-C-pep, alpha-C-pep). All immunoprecipitates were analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-ASGP-2 4F12 mAb. Negative control, rat liver; positive control, lysate of 13762 cell microvilli [40]



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Analysis of SMC/Muc4 in vaginal rinse fractions. Vaginal tissue was slit longitudinally and rinsed for 1 min in a series of solutions of isotonic salt (single-strength PBS), high salt (double-strength PBS), mild denaturant (1.5 M urea), and mild detergent (0.05% Triton X-100). The rinses along with homogenate of the rinsed vaginal tissue were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with 4F12 mAb. The numbers at the top of the panel indicate the number of rinses during the serial rinses in the appropriate solution

Immunohistochemical Localization of SMC/Muc4

Immunohistochemical techniques were used to determine the localization of SMC/Muc4 in the various tissues of the female reproductive tract. In order to have a protective function, SMC/Muc4 must be present at the luminal surface of epithelia. The pattern of SMC/Muc4 expression in the oviduct, uterus, cervix, and vagina was examined from rats that were at the diestrous, proestrous, estrous, and metestrous stages using 4F12 antibody (Fig. 4). Three rats were examined to determine the immunohistochemical localization of SMC in different tissues for each stage of the estrous cycle. The expression of SMC was uniform in all the rats examined, with minimal variation between animals. In the uterus, the staining was localized at the apical aspects of the luminal (Fig. 4, a–d) and glandular epithelial cells (not shown). Staining of the uterine luminal epithelium was the most intense during the estrous (Fig. 4c) and metestrous (Fig. 4d) stages; staining decreased during the diestrous (Fig. 4a) and proestrous (Fig. 4b) stages. During the estrous and metestrous stages, SMC appeared to be localized not only at the apical surface of uterine epithelia but also intracellularly (Fig. 4). No significant differences were observed in the staining patterns of SMC/Muc4 in glandular epithelia during the estrous cycle (data not shown), indicating that SMC is differentially regulated in the luminal, as compared to the glandular, epithelia.



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Immunoperoxidase localization of SMC/Muc4 in different tissues of the female reproductive tract during the estrous cycle. Sections (5 µm) of the uterus, cervix, and vagina were prepared from rats that were in diestrous, proestrous, estrous, and metestrous stages and stained with 4F12 mAb. Control slides did not receive primary mAb. L, Lumen; dotted arrow in m points to cornified layer. In n, infiltrating leukocytes are indicated by solid arrow. Bar = 50 µm

In contrast to observations in the uterus, vaginal expression of SMC/Muc4 was not substantially quantitatively altered during the estrous cycle (Fig. 1). However, the localization pattern of vaginal staining with 4F12 varied substantially during the cycle (Fig. 4, k–o). At the diestrous stage, there was strong staining at the apical surface of the columnar stratified layer (Fig. 4k). At the proestrous stage, the luminal epithelium comprises two layers of cuboidal cells, both of which stained with 4F12. The underlying squamous epithelium, which is separated from the columnar epithelial cells by cornified cell layers, showed intense staining with 4F12. The underlying columnar cells did not express SMC/Muc4 (Fig. 4l). During the estrous stage, the superficial columnar cells from the proestrous stage are sloughed off, exposing the stratified squamous epithelium, which is covered by a thick cornified layer. During this stage, the stratified squamous epithelium, composed of 3–4 cell layers, showed intense staining (Fig. 4m). Toward the end of the estrous stage, the cornified layers begin sloughing off. The cornified layer is completely detached from the underlying viable epithelium during the metestrous stage, and the epithelium is infiltrated by leukocytes. During this stage, distinct superficial layers of the stratified squamous epithelium stained intensely for SMC/Muc4 (Fig. 4n).

SMC expression in the endocervix and ectocervix was quantitatively similar to that in the vagina during the estrous cycle, and the localization patterns also changed substantially. During the diestrous stage of the endocervix, 2–3 layers of the superficial stratified columnar epithelium stained intensely with 4F12 (Fig. 4f). Likewise, in the ectocervix, a superficial layer of stratified cells stained positive. In the proestrous stage, 1–2 layers of the stratified columnar epithelial cells of the endocervix stained intensely (Fig. 4g). The number of cell layers in the ectocervix staining with 4F12 increased to about 4–5 stratified columnar cells, though the staining appeared somewhat discontinuous. During the estrous stage, 5–6 layers of the stratified squamous epithelium in the endocervix stained intensely with 4F12 (Fig. 4m). During the metestrous stage, about 4–5 layers of the stratified columnar cells stained strongly. The number of layers staining with the 4F12 antibody increased to the full thickness of the epithelium in the metestrous endocervix. The most superficial layer of the luminal epithelium showed weak staining, and the underlying layers of about 5–6 cells stained intensely with 4F12. This superficial layer is infiltrated with leukocytes. In the ectocervix, there is a transition to about 3–4 stratified squamous cells that stained with 4F12 (Fig. 4i).

Although there were differences in the staining patterns among different regions of the oviduct, the expression level did not appear to change during the estrous cycle. The isthmus of the oviduct, which is composed of highly branched folds whose epithelium consists of a single layer of ciliated and secretory columnar cells, stained intensely at the apical surface. In addition, weak staining was observed intracellularly (Fig. 5a). The infundibulum and ampulla of the oviduct are also composed of branched folds, whose epithelium is lined with a single layer of ciliated and secretory columnar cells. SMC expression in cells of the infundibulum (data not shown) and ampulla (Fig. 5b) appeared weak and localized at the apical surface of these cells.



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunoperoxidase localization of SMC/Muc4 in the oviduct of a rat in the proestrous stage. Sections (5 µm) of the oviduct were stained with 4F12 mAb. Isthmus of the oviduct is shown in a; ampulla is shown in b. The isthmus region stained with only the secondary antibody as a control is shown in c. L, Lumen. Bar = 100 µm

SMC/Muc4 Expression in Ovariectomized Rats

Blastocyst implantation involves direct interaction between the apical surfaces of the endometrial epithelium and the trophoblast, and thus requires that the uterus be in a receptive state [24]. Receptivity is regulated by the ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone. Previous work in our laboratory has shown that SMC/Muc4 expression is lost in the uteri of ovariectomized rats and regained upon estrogen treatment. Estrogen-induced expression of SMC/Muc4 in the uterus is blocked in the presence of progesterone [12]. Existing data on the role of estrogen and progesterone in uterine SMC/Muc4 expression raise the question of whether the effect of these hormones is specific to the uterine epithelium or whether it also applies to other regions of the female reproductive tract, such as the cervix and vagina. In this study, ovariectomized rats were treated with either sesame oil (as a control), estrogen, or progesterone for 3 consecutive days. Lysates of the uteri, cervix, and vagina were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting using 4F12 antibody (Fig. 6). Consistent with the previously reported data, SMC/Muc4 expression was lost in the uterus of ovariectomized rats and regained upon treatment with estrogen, while progesterone failed to induce SMC expression in the uterus. In contrast, SMC/Muc4 was expressed in the cervix and vagina of ovariectomized rats at levels similar to those found in untreated animals (Fig. 6). Moreover, the levels of expression of the glycoprotein complex did not appear to change upon estrogen or progesterone treatment. These results suggest that, in contrast to the uterus, the cervix and vagina constitutively express SMC/Muc4 and do not require the presence of estrogen for expression.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Effects of estradiol and progesterone on SMC protein expression in the uterus, cervix, and vagina. Ovariectomized rats were injected with A) estradiol (2.5 µg), B) progesterone (4 mg), or C) sesame oil (control) for 3 consecutive days and killed. Total protein was isolated from uterus (U), cervix (C), and vagina (V), resolved on SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted using anti-ASGP-2 mAB 4F12. Dash indicates position of Mr 98 000 marker

Although no significant differences were observed in the expression level of SMC/Muc4 in the lower female reproductive tract of ovariectomized rats under different hormonal treatments, it was important to analyze possible differences in the localization patterns of SMC/Muc4 with the different hormonal treatments because of the substantial effects of the hormones on tissue histology. SMC/Muc4 expression pattern was analyzed in the uterus, cervix, and vagina immunohistochemically using the monoclonal 4F12 antibody. In the uterus of estrogen-treated, ovariectomized animals, SMC/Muc4 expression was intense in the luminal epithelial cells (Fig. 7a), resembling that of the early estrous stage (see Fig 4c). However, SMC/Muc4 expression was abolished at the luminal epithelium of progesterone-treated and control animals (Fig. 7, b and c). SMC/Muc4 expression was present in the uterine glandular epithelium of estrogen-treated (data not shown), progesterone-treated (Fig. 7b), and control rats (data not shown), suggesting that SMC/Muc4 may be regulated by different mechanisms in uterine luminal and glandular epithelia.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Effects of estradiol and progesterone on SMC/Muc4 protein expression. Ovariectomized rats were injected with estradiol (2.5 µg), progesterone (4 mg), or sesame oil (control) for 3 consecutive days and killed. Immunoperoxidase localization was performed using 4F12 mAb. a) Uterus ovariectomized plus estrogen; b) uterus ovariectomized plus progesterone; c) uterus control; d) cervix ovariectomized plus estrogen; e) cervix ovariectomized plus progesterone; f) cervix control. Bar = 50 µm. L, lumen. Arrow points to stained glandular epithelium

The pattern of SMC/Muc4 localization in the cervix appears to be influenced by estrogen treatment. In ovariectomized rats, the cervical lumen is lined by a single layer of simple columnar cells that stained strongly at the apical surface (Fig. 7f). Upon estrogen treatment, the cervical lumen is lined by a stratified squamous epithelium composed of about 3–4 cells (Fig. 7d), which stained intensely. Progesterone treatment did not appear to significantly change the SMC/Muc4 expression, which was similar to that of control animals. These results indicate that SMC/Muc4 is constitutively expressed in the cervix of ovariectomized rats; however, the localization of expression changed in response to estrogen. Similar to the situation in the cervix, the pattern of SMC/Muc4 vaginal localization changed in response to estrogen. In the ovariectomized rats, there was strong staining at the apical surface of the columnar layer lining the vaginal epithelium (data not shown). Upon estrogen treatment, strong staining was evident in the vaginal luminal surface comprising two layers of columnar cells. In addition, weak staining was observed in the stratified squamous epithelium underlying the superficial columnar epithelial cells. The process of cornification was evident below the squamous epithelial layer. This pattern of staining in the vagina of the ovariectomized rat closely resembled that of the proestrous stage in the estrous cycle. Progesterone treatment did not appear to affect SMC/Muc4 expression in the vagina.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The presence of multiple mucins, including MUC4, has been reported in the epithelia of the human female reproductive tract [7]. Table 1 summarizes the results of our analyses of SMC/Muc4 in the normal rat female reproductive tract during the estrous cycle. Interestingly, only at the luminal surface in the uterus does SMC/Muc4 undergo substantial changes in expression during the cycle. Similarly, changes in the expression of mucins such as Muc1 have been observed in the mouse uterus as a function of the estrous cycle [9]. In addition, modulation of other molecules, including c-myc [32], epidermal growth factor [33], and lactoferrin [34, 35], has been reported in the uterus/vagina during the estrous cycle. SMC/Muc4 glycoprotein has been previously observed in the rat uterus and appears to be down-regulated during the time of receptivity [12].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Summary of SMC/Muc4 expression in different tissues of the female rat reproductive tract during the estrous cycle

During the estrous cycle, the uterus undergoes multiple changes that are coordinated with the levels of the ovarian hormones estrogen and progesterone in the plasma. Work on Muc1 in the mouse uterus showed the highest expression level of this glycoprotein in the proestrous and estrous stages, which correspond with high estrogen levels, while the lowest levels of Muc-1 were observed in the metestrous and diestrous stages, which correspond with high progesterone levels [9]. Previous work by McNeer et al. [12] indicated the modulation of SMC/Muc4 expression by estrogen and progesterone in hormone replacement experiments such that SMC/Muc4 was up-regulated in ovariectomized rats treated with estrogen and down-regulated by progesterone. In contrast, other regions of the female reproductive tract constitutively express SMC/Muc4 and are unresponsive to ovarian hormones (summarized in Table 2). Even the uterine glandular epithelium appears unresponsive. These studies indicate that the hormonal regulation of SMC/Muc4 applies only to the uterine luminal epithelium in the female reproductive tract and suggest that the uterus has evolved a special regulatory mechanism for the luminal cell mucins, presumably to facilitate the down-regulation of the anti-adhesive effects of the mucins at the time of implantation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Summary of SMC/Muc4 expression in the female rat reproductive tract with or without hormone treatments following ovariectomy

The novel finding of SMC/Muc4 in the oviduct raises questions about its function in a tissue where protection would appear to be less important. Several studies have focused on the expression of glycoproteins in the oviduct. The oviduct functions as a tube for the transport of gametes and also is an active secretory organ, whose secretions maintain a suitable environment for continued maturation of male gametes, interaction between gametes, and early embryonic development [36]. Previous studies showed the presence of a high molecular weight glycoprotein that is secreted by epithelial cells of the oviduct in the goat [37], baboon [38], and sheep [36]. These oviductal glycoproteins appear to be modulated by ovarian steroid hormones, and may be estrogen-dependent [38]. In addition, localization of these glycoproteins was the highest in the oviductal epithelium at the follicular phase when levels of plasma estrogen were high [37, 38]. In our study, oviductal SMC/Muc4 expression did not appear to be modulated during the estrous cycle. However, its expression appears to have regional specificity. SMC/Muc4 is expressed at a higher level in the epithelia of the isthmus as compared to the ampulla or infundibulum. Perhaps the expression pattern is related to the variety of reproductive and developmental events that occur along the length of the oviduct.

We also report the novel finding of SMC/Muc4 protein in the rat cervix and vagina in a constitutive manner during the estrous cycle. Previous studies have shown rheological changes in the human reproductive tract mucus in response to menstrual cycle phase. At ovulation, the mucus is watery, but it becomes viscous after ovulation [10]. Many groups have attempted to determine changes in glycoproteins that may contribute to the alterations in the mucus character. Work by Vrcic et al. [39] showed that distinct lectin reactivity patterns accompany the cyclic changes in the morphology of the vaginal epithelium. Studies by Gipson et al. [7] indicated the presence of MUC4 and MUC1 message in the ectocervical and vaginal epithelium, but they did not show any variations during different phases of the menstrual cycle. These findings suggest that viscosity changes in human cervical mucus are likely due to the presence of other mucins, probably of the gel-forming class.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. C.A.C. Carraway and Peter Li for many helpful discussions and critical reading of this manuscript. We also thank Dr. Li for advice on immunohistochemical staining techniques and Dr. Pedro Salas for assistance with microscopy.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This research was supported by grant HD35472 from the National Institutes of Health and by the Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center of the University of Miami School of Medicine. Back

2 Correspondence: Kermit L. Carraway, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy (R-124), University of Miami School of Medicine, PO Box 016960, Miami, FL 33101. FAX: 305 243 4431; kcarrawa{at}mednet.med.miami.edu Back

Accepted: July 12, 1999.

Received: May 3, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Hafez ESE. Human Reproduction. Conception and Contraception. Hagerstown: Harper and Row; 1980: 221–252.
  2. Carraway KL, Membrane mucin preparation. In: Corfield T (ed.), Mucin Methods and Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1999: (in press).
  3. Gendler SJ, Spicer AP. Epithelial mucin genes. Annu Rev Physiol 1995; 57:607–634.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Hilkens J, Ligtenberg MJL, Vos HL, Litvinov SV. Cell membrane-associated mucins and their adhesion-modulating property. Trends Biochem Sci 1992; 17:359–363.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Carraway KL, Fregien N, Carraway CAC, Carraway III KL. Tumor sialomucin complexes as tumor antigens and modulators of cellular interactions and proliferation. J Cell Sci 1992; 103:299–307.[Medline]
  6. Komatsu M, Carraway CAC, Fregien NL, Carraway KL. Reversible disruption of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions by overexpression of sialomucin complex. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:33245–33254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gipson IK, Ho SB, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Tisdale AS, Zhan Q, Torlakovic E, Pudney J, Anderson DJ, Toribara NW, Hill III JA. Mucin genes expressed by human female reproductive tract epithelia. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:999–1011.[Abstract]
  8. Audie JP, Tetaert D, Pigny P, Buisine MP, Janin A, Aubert J-P. Mucin gene expression in the human endocervix. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:98–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Braga VMM, Gendler SJ. Modulation of Muc-1 mucin expression in the mouse uterus during the estrus cycle, early pregnancy and placentation. J Cell Sci 1993; 105:397–405.[Abstract]
  10. Wolf DP, Blasco L, Khan MA, Litt M. Human cervical mucus. IV. Viscoelasticity and sperm penetrability during the ovulatory menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1978; 30:163–169.[Medline]
  11. Gipson IK, Spurr-Michaud SJ, Moccia R, Zhan Q, Toribara NW, Ho SB, Gargiula AR, Hill III JA. MUC4 and MUC5B transcripts are the prevalent mucin messenger ribonucleic acids of the human endocervix. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:58–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. McNeer RR, Carraway CAC, Fregien NL, Carraway KL. Characterization of the expression and steroid hormone control of sialomucin complex in the rat uterus: implications for uterine receptivity. J Cell Physiol 1998; 176:110–119.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Valdizan MC, Julian J, Carson DD. WGA-binding, mucin glycoproteins protect the apical cell surface of mouse uterine epithelial cells. J Cell Physiol 1992; 151:451–465.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. McNeer RR, Price-Schiavi S, Komatsu M, Fregien N, Carraway CAC, Carraway KL. Sialomucin complex in tumors and tissues. Front Biosci 1997; 2:449–459.
  15. Sherblom AP, Carraway KL. A complex of two cell surface glycoproteins from ascites mammary adenocarcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 1980; 255:12051–12059.[Free Full Text]
  16. Sherblom AP, Buck RL, Carraway KL. Purification of the major sialoglycoproteins of 13762 MAT-B1 and MAT-C1 rat ascites mammary adenocarcinoma cells by density gradient centrifugation in cesium chloride and guanidine hydrochloride. J Biol Chem 1980; 255:783–790.[Free Full Text]
  17. Hull SR, Sheng Z, Vanderpuye OA, David C, Carraway KL. Isolation and partial characterization of ascites sialoglycoprotein-2 (ASGP-2) of the cell surface sialomucin complex of 13762 rat mammary adenocarcinoma cells. Biochem J 1990; 265:121–129.[Medline]
  18. Sheng Z, Wu K, Carraway KL, Fregien N. Molecular cloning of the transmembrane component of the 13762 mammary adenocarcinoma sialomucin complex. A new member of the epidermal growth family superfamily. J Biol Chem 1992; 267:16341–16346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Rossi EA, McNeer R, Price-Schiavi SA, Komatsu M, Van den Brande JMH, Thompson JF, Carraway CAC, Fregien NL, Carraway KL. Sialomucin complex, a heterodimeric glycoprotein complex: expression as a soluble, secretable form in lactating mammary gland and colon. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:33476–33485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. McNeer RR, Huang D, Fregien NL, Carraway KL. Sialomucin complex in the rat respiratory tract: a model for its role in epithelial protection. Biochem J 1998; 330:737–744.
  21. Price-Schiavi SA, Meller D, Jing X, Merritt J, Carvajal ME, Tseng SCG, Carraway KL. Sialomucin complex at the rat ocular surface: a new model for ocular surface protection. Biochem J 1998; 335:457–463.
  22. Price-Schiavi SA, Carraway CAC, Fregien N, Carraway KL. Post-transcriptional regulation of a milk membrane protein, the sialomucin complex (ascites sialoglycoprotein (ASGP)-1/ASGP-2, rat Muc4) by TGFß. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:35228–35237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Schlafke S, Enders AC. Cellular basis of interaction between trophoblast and uterus at implantation. Biol Reprod 1975; 12:41–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Enders AC. Anatomical aspects of implantation. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1976; 25:1–15.
  25. Finn CA, Martin L. The control of implantation. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 39:195–206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Psychoyos A. Hormonal control of ovoimplantation. Vitam Horm 1973; 31:201–256.[Medline]
  27. Yoshinaga K. Uterine receptivity for blastocyst implantation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1998; 541:424–431.[Medline]
  28. Denker H-W. Implantation: a cell biological paradox. J Exp Zool 1993; 266:541–558.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. DeSouza MM, Mani SK, Julian J, Carson DD. Reduction of mucin-1 expression during the receptive phase in the rat uterus. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1503–1507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Vanderpuye OA, Carraway CAC, Carraway KL. Microfilament association of ASGP-2, the concanavalin A-binding glycoprotein of the cell surface sialomucin complex of 13762 rat mammary ascites tumor cells. Exp Cell Res 1988; 178:211–223.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Warburton MJ, Mitchell D, Ormerod EJ, Rudland PS. Distribution of myoepithelial cells and basement membrane proteins in the resting, pregnant, lactating and involuting rat mammary gland. J Histochem Cytochem 1982; 30:667–676.[Abstract]
  32. Huet-Hudson YM, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Cell type-specific localization of c-myc protein in the mouse uterus: modulation by steroid hormones and analysis of the periimplantation period. Endocrinology 1989; 125:1683–1690.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Huet-Hudson YM, Chakraborty C, De SK, Suzuki Y, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Estrogen regulates the synthesis of epidermal growth factor in mouse uterine epithelial cells. Mol Endocrinol 1990; 4:510–523.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. McMaster MT, Teng CT, Dey SK, Andrews GK. Lactoferrin in the mouse uterus: analyses of the preimplantation period. Mol Endocrinol 1992; 6:101–111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Walmer DK, Wrona MA, Hughes CL, Nelson KG. Lactoferrin expression in the mouse reproductive tract during the natural estrous cycle: correlation with circulating estradiol and progesterone. Endocrinology 1992; 131:1458–1466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Gandolfi F, Brevini TAL, Richardson L, Brown CR, Moor RM. Characterization of proteins secreted by sheep oviduct epithelial cells and their function in embryonic development. Development 1989; 106:303–312.[Abstract]
  37. Abe H, Abe M. Immunological detection of an oviductal glycoprotein in the rat. J Exp Zool 1993; 266:328–335.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Verhage HG, Mavrogianis PA, Boice ML, Li W, Fazleabas AT. Oviductal epithelium of the baboon: hormonal control and the immuno-gold localization of oviduct-specific glycoproteins. Am J Anat 1990; 187:81–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Vrcic H, Horvat B, Damjanov I. Lectin histochemistry of mouse vagina during the estrous cycle. J Histochem Cytochem 1991; 39:1685–1692.[Abstract]
  40. Carraway CAC, Carvajal ME, Li Y, Carraway KL. Association of p185neu with microfilaments via a large glycoprotein complex in mammary carcinoma microvilli. Evidence for a microfilament-associated signal transduction particle. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:5582–5587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
P. Chaturvedi, A. P. Singh, and S. K. Batra
Structure, evolution, and biology of the MUC4 mucin
FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 966 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Perez, R. Barco, I. Fernandez, S. A. Price-Schiavi, and K. L. Carraway
PEA3 Transactivates the Muc4/Sialomucin Complex Promoter in Mammary Epithelial and Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 36942 - 36952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. Argueso, S. Spurr-Michaud, A. Tisdale, and I. K. Gipson
Variation in the Amount of T Antigen and N-Acetyllactosamine Oligosaccharides in Human Cervical Mucus Secretions with the Menstrual Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5641 - 5648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
N. Ameen, Y Figueroa, and P. Salas
Anomalous apical plasma membrane phenotype in CK8-deficient mice indicates a novel role for intermediate filaments in the polarization of simple epithelia
J. Cell Sci., January 2, 2001; 114(3): 563 - 575.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Idris, N.
Right arrow Articles by Carraway, K. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS