Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.
Biology of Reproduction 62, 557-563 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Sperm Aster Formation and Pronuclear Decondensation During Rabbit Fertilization and Development of a Functional Assay for Human Sperm1

Yukihiro Terada3,a, Calvin R. Simerlya,c, Laura Hewitsona,c, and Gerald Schatten2,a,b,c

a Department of Reproductive Sciences, Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (Oregon Health Sciences University), Beaverton, Oregon 97006 b Department of Cell-Developmental Biology and c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microtubule organization and chromatin configurations in rabbit eggs after in vivo rabbit fertilization and after intracytoplasmic injection with human sperm were characterized. In unfertilized eggs, an anastral barrel-shaped meiotic spindle, oriented radially to the cortex, was observed. After rabbit sperm incorporation, microtubules were organized into a radial aster from the sperm head, and cytoplasmic microtubules were organized around the male and female pronuclei. The microtubules extending from the decondensed sperm head participated in pronuclear migration, and organization around the female pronucleus may also be important for pronuclear centration. Support for these observations was found in parthenogenetically activated eggs, in which microtubule arrays were organized around the single female pronucleus that formed after artificial activation. These observations support a biparental centrosomal contribution during rabbit fertilization as opposed to a strictly paternal inheritance pattern suggested from previous studies. In rabbit eggs that received injected human donor sperm, an astral array of microtubules radiated from the sperm neck and enlarged as the sperm head underwent pronuclear decondensation. {gamma}-Tubulin was observed in the center of the sperm aster. We conclude that the rabbit egg exhibits a blended centrosomal contribution necessary for completion of fertilization and that the rabbit egg may be a novel animal model for assessing centrosomal function in human sperm and spermatogenic cells following intracytoplasmic injection.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is a widely used clinical assisted reproductive technique. However, little is known about the molecular and cellular mechanism of fertilization following ICSI (reviewed by Schatten et al. [1]). The rate of sex chromosomal anomalies has been reported to be higher in human babies following ICSI [2]. Clinically, ICSI is applied in the case of repeated fertilization failures following in vitro fertilization (IVF). Several reports indicate that many eggs diagnosed in the clinic as "unfertilized" actually initiate aspects of the fertilization process but arrest at specific stages. Furthermore, some of the fertilization failures arise from defects in the zygotic centrosome, the oocyte's microtubule organizing center, after insemination [3, 4]. For such cases, ICSI may not be an effective alternative to achieve fertilization. If so, then a novel assay for the detection of centrosomal defects might be developed in a relevant animal model for the purpose of examining male factor or idiopathic infertility.

During fertilization, the centrosome is typically introduced by the sperm in primates [4, 5], cattle [6], pigs [7], and sheep [8]. Function of the zygotic centrosome varies among bulls during IVF, and this variation affects male fertility [9]. In contrast to most mammals, rodent fertilization is accomplished by maternally inherited centrosomes [1013]. In mice, the paternal centrosome degenerates during spermiogenesis [14], and sperm asters are not observed at the base of the incorporated sperm head (reviewed by Schatten [15]). Astral microtubules are absent from the human sperm centrosome injected into hamster eggs [13], indicating that rodent eggs are probably not a suitable model for assessing the sperm centrosomal function for nonrodent sperm.

Rabbits are lagomorphs, and centrosomal inheritance has been considered to follow the paternal pattern of centrosomal inheritance because of the presence of a monoastral sperm aster [16, 17]. In addition, isolated sperm heads without midpieces failed to nucleate sperm asters in rabbit eggs [18]. These reports suggest that rabbit eggs may be a suitable tool for assessing human sperm centrosomal function. Conversely, Szöllösi et al. [19] reported perinuclear distribution of centrosomal-like structures by electron microscopy in rabbit zygotes. These observations conflict with the interpretation of a strict contribution of the paternal centrosome during rabbit fertilization.

Although a number of sperm centrosomal proteins have been characterized, interactions between centrosomal proteins and centrosomal functions are still elusive [20]. {gamma}-Tubulin is an essential centrosomal protein serving both to nucleate microtubules and to define their intrinsic polarity [2022]. Furthermore, a key step in the transformation of the inherited sperm centrosome into a functional zygotic centrosome capable of recruiting the necessary maternal cytoplasmic constituents for assembling the sperm aster is the attraction of maternal {gamma}-tubulin protein [23]. Detection of {gamma}-tubulin at the centrosome may, therefore, serve to indicate sperm centrosomal function in the early zygote.

To assess the centrosomal inheritance in rabbit fertilization, we examined microtubule organization and chromatin configurations in rabbit eggs after in vivo fertilization and artificial activation by injection of a crude sperm factor isolated from the rhesus monkey. We also observed astral microtubule assembly and {gamma}-tubulin expression in the human sperm centrosome after intracytoplasmic injection of human sperm into rabbit eggs.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oocyte and Zygote Collection

All animal procedures were approved by the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mature female New Zealand White rabbits were superovulated with six intramuscular injections of 0.3 mg FSH from porcine pituitary (Vetrepharm, London, ON) followed by a single i.m. injection of 75 IU hCG (Profasi; Serono, Randolph, MA). Oocytes were collected by follicular aspiration 4–6 h post-hCG under anesthesia by tracheal intubation and maintenance with isoflurane gas (2.5%). Oocytes were cultured overnight in CMRL medium (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MO) containing 20% inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone, Logan, UT), 10 mg/ml pituitary FSH, and 5 IU/ml hCG. Cumulus cells were removed by a brief incubation in 2 mg/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in Tyrode's albumin lactate pyruvate solution with 20 mM Hepes (TALP-Hepes), and only eggs that had arrested at the second meiotic metaphase were used for this study. Fertilized rabbit zygotes were collected from superovulated females 14–16 h postcoitum, by flushing the oviducts after the rabbits were killed by sodium pentobarbital, and were cultured in Ham's F-10 (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 20% inactivated FCS. Each experiment was performed a minimum of three times. In total, 86 in vivo-fertilized zygotes, 18 parthenogenetically activated eggs, and 72 zygotes after ICSI fertilization were examined for this study.

Parthenogenetic Activation of Rabbit Eggs by Sperm Factor

Rhesus ejaculated sperm were collected as described by Bavister et al. [24]. To prepare extracts, sperm were washed in TALP-Hepes, then washed three times in ICM (intracellular medium: 120 mM KCl, 20 mM Hepes, 100 mM EGTA, 10 mM sodium glycerophosphate, pH 7.5). Washed sperm were diluted in ICM to a concentration of 7 x 108 and lysed by freezing-thawing in liquid nitrogen four times. Sperm suspensions were centrifuged at 100 000 x g for 1 h at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and concentrated in Centricon-30 tubes (Amicon Corp., Beverly, MA). Supernatants were aliquoted in 10-µl fractions and stored frozen at -80°C. A sperm factor was microinjected into rabbit eggs according to the procedure of Simerly et al. [25]. Briefly, concentrated rhesus sperm factor was front-loaded into 1–2-µm beveled micropipettes and pressure-injected into eggs containing the first polar bodies. Sham microinjections were performed as controls. All eggs were microinjected with about 5% of the egg volume, or about 10–15 pl per egg. Activated eggs identified by extrusion of the second polar body were fixed and stained at an appropriate stage of parthenogenesis.

ICSI with Human Sperm

Human sperm were used in accordance with the OHSU Human Subjects Internal Review Board. Frozen human semen samples (Follas Labs, Indiana, OH) were thawed in a water bath at 37°C, layered over a discontinuous Percoll gradient of 45% and 90%, and then centrifuged at 700 x g for 20 min [26]. Sperm were resuspended in TALP-Hepes, and ICSI was performed according to the procedure of Hewitson et al. [26]. Briefly, a single sperm in TALP-Hepes with 10% polyvinyl pyrrolidone (Sigma) was aspirated into a glass injection pipette and deposited in the egg cytoplasm after gentle aspiration of the oolemma. After injection, eggs were cultured in Ham's F-10 supplemented with 20% inactivated FCS, then fixed and stained at an appropriate stage of development.

Immunocytochemical Detection of Microtubules, Centrosomes, and DNA

Zonae pellucidae were removed with 0.5% Pronase (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) after a brief exposure to acidified Tyrode's solution (pH 2.5) at 37°C. After a 30-min recovery at 37°C, eggs and zygotes were extracted by buffer M (25% [v:v] glycerol, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM imidazole hydrochloride, and 1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 6.8) and fixed in cold methanol according to the methods of Simerly and Schatten [27]. Microtubules were labeled with a mixture of monoclonal antibody to ß-tubulin (E7; diluted 1:5; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA) and acetylated {alpha}-tubulin (clone 6-11-B1; diluted 1:100; Sigma) for the detection of the incorporated sperm axoneme. Primary antibodies were detected by fluorescein- or rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG; diluted 1:40; Zymed, San Francisco, CA). Eggs and zygotes were then labeled with a polyclonal antibody raised against the C terminus of Xenopus laevis {gamma}-tubulin (diluted 1:100; Babco, Richmond, CA) and detected using appropriate fluorochrome-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (diluted 1:40; Sigma). DNA was detected after labeling with 10 mg/ml Hoechst 33258. Coverslips were mounted in anti-fade medium (Vectashield; Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA) and examined using a Zeiss Axiophot epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) or a scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS NT; Leica Microsystems, Heidelberg, Germany). Images were pseudocolored using Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems Inc., Mountain View, CA) and printed on a Sony dye sublimation video-printer (Sony, Carson, CA) as described previously [6].


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microtubule Organization and Chromatin Configuration During Rabbit In Vivo Fertilization

Microtubule and chromatin configurations during in vivo rabbit fertilization are presented in Figure 1. In unfertilized eggs (Fig. 1A), an anastral barrel-shaped meiotic spindle (green), oriented radially to the cortex, was observed, and chromosomes (blue) were aligned at the metaphase plate as previously reported [17]. After sperm incorporation, microtubules formed a radial aster from the base of the sperm head (Fig. 1B; arrow). As the sperm aster continued to enlarge, microtubules were organized around the male (Mpn) and female pronuclei (Fpn; Fig. 1C). During pronuclear centration, microtubule arrays without a distinct nucleation site were observed around the Mpn and Fpn (Fig. 1D; arrow: sperm tail). A confocal image demonstrates the perinuclear distribution of microtubules around both pronuclei (Fig. 1E). At prophase, an array of microtubules was observed around the condensing Mpn and Fpn (Fig. 1F). Confocal images of microtubules (green) around pronuclei (blue) at similar stages indicated the presence of perinuclear microtubule arrays without the distinct bipolar centrosomal arrays (Fig. 2), observations consistent with those in other species [15]. In the first mitotic prometaphase (Fig. 1G), an anastral barrel-shaped spindle (green) was formed with broad spindle poles (arrowheads). The sperm tail (arrow) was observed in close association with the spindle pole. At the two-cell stage (Fig. 1H), daughter nuclei were surrounded by a dense microtubule array, and the sperm tail (arrow) was found in one blastomere.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Microtubule (green) and chromatin (blue) configurations during rabbit fertilization. A) In the fresh, unfertilized rabbit egg, the only microtubule organization observed was in the anastral, barrel-shaped second meiotic spindle. B) Sperm aster formation (arrow) at the base of the sperm head (14 h post-hCG), indicating the inheritance of a paternal centrosome. The midbody structure connecting the decondensing female chromosomes with the second polar body nucleus is seen in the right side of this image. C, D) Rabbit zygotes at 16 h and 18 h post-hCG, respectively (arrow: sperm tail). Note the extensive microtubule organization around both the Mpn and the Fpn. E) A confocal image of the microtubule patterns observed around the Mpn and Fpn during centration (18 h post-hCG; arrow: sperm tail). F) Prophase rabbit zygote (20 h post-hCG), with an extensive sheath of microtubules around the adjacent Mpn and Fpn. G) First mitotic prometaphase (22 h post-hCG; arrowheads: spindle poles). Note that the sperm axoneme remains associated with one of the developing mitotic spindle poles (arrow: sperm tail). H) Rabbit two-cell stage embryo (24 h post-hCG; arrow: sperm tail), demonstrating extensive microtubule organization around the daughter nuclei. Bar = 10 µm



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Serial optical sections of microtubules (green) around pronuclei (blue) in the first mitotic prophase of an embryo as observed by confocal microscope. Both pronuclei are surrounded by dense microtubule arrays without nucleation sites, suggesting perinuclear distribution of maternal centrosomes. Bar = 10 µm

Microtubule Organization and Chromatin Configuration During Parthenogenetic Activation of Rabbit Eggs by Microinjection of Rhesus Sperm Factor

Sperm factor injection into rabbit eggs induced egg activation effectively, and the observed microtubule and DNA configurations are shown in Figure 3. At the pronuclear stage, microtubule arrays (green) similar to the patterns of microtubules observed after in vivo fertilization were organized around the Fpn (blue) that formed after activation (Fig. 3, A and B). In the first mitotic prometaphase, a bipolar anastral barrel-shaped spindle was observed (Fig. 3C). During late telophase, microtubules were mostly observed at the poleward face of the separating, decondensing daughter chromosomes (Fig. 3D).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Microtubule (green) organization and chromatin (blue) configuration during parthenogenetic activation of rabbit eggs. A, B) In the pronuclear stage, microtubule arrays were organized around the Fpn that formed after activation. C) In the first mitotic prometaphase, a bipolar anastral barrel-shaped spindle was observed. D) In late telophase, daughter nuclei were surrounded by microtubules without nucleation sites. Bar = 10 µm

Microtubule Organization, Chromatin Configuration, and {gamma}-Tubulin Detection in Rabbit Eggs After Intracytoplasmic Injection with Human Sperm

Microtubules, DNA configurations, and {gamma}-tubulin were observed in rabbit eggs after intracytoplasmic injection with human sperm (Fig. 4). We observed that 26 of 72 (36.1%) eggs were activated with decondensed sperm nuclei following ICSI. Beginning 3–4 h postinjection, an astral array of microtubules (green) from the base of the microinjected human sperm head could be observed (Fig. 4A). {gamma}-Tubulin (red) was detected in the sperm centrosome (Fig. 4B). As the human sperm head decondensed in the rabbit egg cytoplasm, microtubule arrays were organized around both the Mpn and Fpn (Fig. 4C; arrow: sperm tail), and {gamma}-tubulin was still detected (Fig. 4D; arrowhead).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Microtubule (green) and chromatin (blue) configuration and {gamma}-tubulin (bright red) detection in rabbit eggs after intracytoplasmic injection with human sperm. A) Beginning at 3–4 h post-ICSI, an astral array of microtubules (arrow) from microinjected human sperm heads (arrowhead) could be observed. B) {gamma}-Tubulin (arrow) was also detected in the sperm head (arrowhead). C) During pronuclear formation, astral arrays of microtubules did not radiate into the entire cytoplasm, and both Mpn and Fpn were surrounded by a microtubule array detected by confocal microscopy (arrow: sperm tail). D) During pronuclear centration, Mpn and Fpn were surrounded by a microtubule array without nucleation sites (arrow: sperm tail) and {gamma}-tubulin was still detected in sperm centrosome (arrowhead). Bar = 10 µm


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Microtubule Organization and Chromatin Configuration During Rabbit Fertilization

In rabbit fertilization, the presence of astral microtubules around the sperm head (sperm aster) has been observed by electron microscopy [16] and immunofluorescence [17, 18]. Our study also shows a sperm aster, indicating the inheritance of a paternal centrosome, in addition to cytoplasmic microtubules organized around the Fpn, which is without a distinct nucleation site. We have also observed microtubule assembly in aged unfertilized rabbit eggs (cytasters; our unpublished observations) as well as around the Fpn in parthenogenetically activated rabbit eggs (see below). Confocal images of early pronuclear-stage zygotes confirm the dual source of microtubule organization within the cytoplasm. Collectively, these data suggest that centrosomal inheritance is biparental in rabbits, with both maternal and paternal contributions during early insemination. Interestingly, Szöllösi et al. [19] reported the presence of paracrystalline structures and striated rootlets around rabbit pronuclei and suggested that these structures were new morphological forms of maternal centrosomes.

From these observations, we hypothesize that the sperm aster is a temporal structure, and that microtubule organization around the pronuclei, probably controlled by perinuclear distribution of maternal centrosomal constituents, may be important for pronuclear centration. The first mitotic spindle was barrel-shaped and anastral, with broad mitotic poles, suggesting a maternal contribution of centrosomal constituents in the first mitotic cycle. Conversely, a sperm axoneme was involved with a single spindle pole (Fig. 1G), suggesting the participation of the sperm centrosome in the formation of the first mitotic spindle. In the first mitotic spindles of humans [4], rhesus monkeys [5], and cattle [6], anastral poles are observed, and the sperm axoneme remains associated with one spindle pole, indicating the contribution of a paternal centriole in the first mitotic cycle.

Support for the maternal contribution of centrosomal constituents is found in parthenogenetically activated eggs following rhesus sperm factor injection (Fig. 3). Microtubule arrays were organized around the single Fpn (Fig. 3, A and B), and the first mitotic spindle was barrel-shaped with broad spindle poles (Fig. 3C). No organized microtubule arrays around the haploid Fpn can be seen in parthenogenetically activated eggs of rhesus monkeys [5] and cattle [6]. In rabbit parthenogenetically activated eggs, centrioles were not observed in earlier stages of development, with de novo formation of centrioles only observed as early as the morula or early blastocyst stages [28].

From these observations, we conclude that a biparental centrosomal contribution is needed for completion of rabbit fertilization. This is different from previous reports that suggest paternal inheritance of microtubule organization in rabbit fertilization [16, 17].

Can Rabbit Eggs Be a Tool for Assessing the Centrosomal Function in Human Sperm?

Our previous studies indicated that about 50% of the eggs clinically diagnosed as "unfertilized" had arrested at specific stages after sperm incorporation, and that some of these fertilization failures were the result of microtubule or centrosome dysfunction [3, 4]. In these cases, ICSI may not be an effective fertilization alternative. Establishment of a system to assess sperm centrosomal function might lead to improved diagnosis and treatment for male and unexplained infertility. However, there is currently no assay in use at fertility clinics to assess sperm centrosomal function in terms of the cytoskeletal events necessary to complete normal fertilization.

The injection of human sperm into hamster eggs is an inappropriate in vitro model for human fertilization because hamster fertilization relies on a maternal centrosome, and human sperm do not undergo microtubule assembly in hamster eggs [13]. Such assays should use eggs that have a paternally derived centrosomal system (e.g., cattle). However, activation rates of cow eggs after ICSI are quite low even when some novel methods are used [29], and manipulation is difficult [1].

The presence of a sperm aster in rabbit fertilization [16, 17] and the absence of a sperm aster around microinjected sperm heads without the sperm midpiece in rabbit eggs [18] suggest that the rabbit egg may be a novel model for assessing human centrosomal function. Sperm aster formation was observed at the sperm head in rabbit eggs after intracytoplasmic injection with human sperm (Fig. 4A). At the pronuclear stage, microtubule astral structures were changed around the pronuclei (Fig. 4, C and D). The patterns of microtubule organization were almost the same as in the rabbit fertilization process described above.

Detection of {gamma}-tubulin in fertilized human and rhesus monkey zygotes has been reported [4, 30]. {gamma}-Tubulin in zygotes is thought to be largely composed of attracted maternal proteins with perhaps some paternal protein contribution [15, 31]. Furthermore, {gamma}-tubulin assembles with pericentrin by a dynein-driven process and induces microtubule nucleation and spindle organization [32]. The development of an assay using Xenopus laevis egg extracts might be a test for centrosomal function using sperm from men with questionable fertility. In humans, {gamma}-tubulin is largely inaccessible in mature sperm until after disulfate bond reduction. Exposure of disulfate-reduced sperm in cytostatic factor-arrested Xenopus cell-free extracts dramatically increases {gamma}-tubulin detection at the sperm centrosome and is thought to be a principal step for sperm aster formation in vitro [23].

It is premature to conclude that centrosomal function in human sperm can be assessed using the rabbit system. However, we can assess the ability to nucleate a sperm aster and to undergo sperm decondensation, and the capacity to accumulate {gamma}-tubulin, one of the representative functional centrosomal proteins, using rabbit eggs. Further studies will be needed regarding the efficacy of these assays as a potential human infertility assay; however, the correlation between the accumulation of centrosomal proteins like {gamma}-tubulin, sperm aster formation, and the further development of zygotes can now be examined in a relevant animal model.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Anda Cornea of the confocal microscopy unit, ORPRC, for technical assistance; Dr. John Fanton for surgical expertise; and Jennifer Wall, ORPRC, for manuscript preparation. Y.T. is currently on sabbatical leave from the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Japan, and wishes to thank Dr. Akira Yajima for continuous support and encouragement.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 This investigation was supported by research grants from the National Institutes of Health (NICHD, NCRR), and by NICHD/NIH through cooperative agreement U54 HD18185-16 as part of the Specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction Research. The Oregon Regional Primate Research Center (ORPRC) is sponsored as an NIH/NCRR Regional Primate Research Center. Back

2 Correspondence: Gerald Schatten, 505 N.W. 185th Avenue, Beaverton, OR 97006. FAX: 503 614 3725; schatten{at}ohsu.edu Back

3 Permanent address: Yukihiro Terada, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan. Back

Accepted: October 19, 1999.

Received: August 5, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Schatten G, Hewitson L, Simerly C, Sutovsky P, Huszar G. Cell and molecular biological challenges of ICSI: ART before science? J Med Ethics 1998; 26:29–37.
  2. Bonduelle M, Wilikens A, Buysse A, Van Assche E, Devroey P, Van Steireteghem AC, Liebaers I. A follow up study of children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with epididymal and testicular spermatozoa and after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained after ICSI. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(suppl 1):196–207.
  3. Asch R, Simerly C, Ord T, Ord VA, Schatten G. The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes which failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Mol Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1897–1906.
  4. Simerly C, Wu GJ, Zoran S, Ord T, Rawlins R, Jones J, Navara C, Gerrity M, Rinehart J, Binor Z, Asch R, Schatten G. The paternal inheritance of centrosome, the cell's microtubule organizing center, in humans, and the implications for infertility. Nat Med 1995; 1:47–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Wu GJ, Simerly C, Zoran SS, Funte LR, Schatten G. Microtubule and chromatin dynamics during fertilization and early development in rhesus monkeys, and regulation by intracellular calcium ions. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:260–270.[Abstract]
  6. Navara CS, First NL, Schatten G. Microtubule organization in the cow during fertilization, polyspermy, parthenogenesis, and nuclear transfer: the role of the sperm aster. Dev Biol 1994; 162:29–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Kim NH, Simerly C, Funahashi H, Schatten G, Day BN. Microtubule organization in porcine oocytes during fertilization and parthenogenesis. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:1397–1404.[Abstract]
  8. Le Guen P, Crozet N. Microtubule and centrosome distribution during sheep fertilization. Eur J Cell Biol 1989; 48:239–249.[Medline]
  9. Navara CS, First NL, Schatten G. Phenotypic variations among paternal centrosomes expressed within the zygote as disparate microtubule lengths and sperm aster organization: correlations between centrosome activity and developmental success. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:5384–5388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82:4152–4156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Schatten H, Schatten G, Mazia D, Balczon R, Simerly C. Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83:105–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Maternal inheritance of centrosomes in mammals? Studies on parthenogenesis and polyspermy in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:6785–6789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hewitson L, Haavisto A, Simerly C, Jones J, Schatten G. Microtubule organization and chromatin configurations in hamster oocytes during fertilization and parthenogenetic activation, and after insemination with human sperm. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:967–975.[Abstract]
  14. Manandhar G, Sutovsky P, Joshi HC, Stearns T, Schatten G. Centrosome reduction during mouse spermiogenesis. Dev Biol 1998; 203:424–434.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Schatten G. The centrosome and its mode of inheritance: the reduction of the centrosome during gametogenesis and its restoration during fertilization. Dev Biol 1994; 165:299–335.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Longo FJ. Sperm aster in rabbit zygotes: its structure and function. J Cell Biol 1976; 69:539–547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Yllera-Fernandez MDM, Crozet N, Ahmed-Ali M. Microtubule distribution during fertilization in the rabbit. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 32:271–276.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Pinto-Correia C, Poccia DL, Chang T, Robl JM. Dephosphorylation of sperm midpiece antigens initiates aster formation in rabbit oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:7894–7898.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Szöllösi MS, Adenot P, Szöllösi D. Centrosomes with striated rootlets in rabbit zygotes. Zygote 1996; 4:173–179.[Medline]
  20. Sutovsky P, Manandhar G, Schatten G. Biogenesis of centrosome during mammalian gametogeneses and fertilization. Protoplasma 1999; 206:249–262.[CrossRef]
  21. Steans T, Winley M. The cell center at 100. Cell 1997; 91:303–309.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Palacious MJ, Joshi HC, Simerly C, Schatten G. {gamma}-Tubulin reorganization during mouse fertilization and early development. J Cell Sci 1993; 104:383–389.[Abstract]
  23. Simerly C, Zoran SS, Payne C, Sutovsky P, Navara CS, Salisbury JL, Schatten G. Biparental inheritance of {gamma}-tubulin during human fertilization: molecular reconstitution of functional zygotic centrosomes in inseminated human oocytes and in cell-free extracts nucleated by human sperm. Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10:2955–2969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bavister BD, Boatman DE, Leibfried L, Loose M, Vernon MW. Fertilization and cleavage of rhesus monkey oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 1983; 28:983–999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Simerly C, Balczon R, Brinkley BR, Schatten G. Microinjected kinetochore antibodies interfere with chromosome movement in meiotic and mitotic mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol 1990; 111:1491–1504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hewitson LC, Simerly CR, Tengowski MW, Sutovsky P, Navara CS, Haavisto AJ, Schatten G. Microtubule and chromatin configurations during rhesus intracytoplasmic sperm injection: successes and failures. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:271–280.[Abstract]
  27. Simerly C, Schatten G. Techniques for localization of specific molecules in oocytes and embryos. Methods Enzymol 1993; 225:516–553.[Medline]
  28. Szöllösi D, Ozil JP. De novo formation of centrioles in parthenogenetically activated, diploidized rabbit embryos. Biol Cell 1991; 72:61–66.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Rho GJ, Kawarsky S, Johnson WH, Kochhar K, Betteridge KJ. Sperm and oocyte treatments to improve the formation of male and female pronuclei and subsequent development following intracytoplasmic sperm injection into bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:918–924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sutovsky P, Hewitson L, Simerly CR, Tengowski MW, Navara CS, Haavisto A, Schatten G. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for Rhesus monkey fertilization results in unusual chromatin, cytoskeletal, and membrane events, but eventually leads to pronuclear development and sperm aster assembly. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:1703–1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Navara CS, Simerly C, Zoran S, Schatten G. The sperm centrosome during fertilization in mammals: implications for fertility and reproduction. Reprod Fertil Dev 1995; 7:747–754.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Young AI, Tuft RA, Doxsey SJ. Assembly of pericentrin and gamma tubulin at the centrosome is dynein-mediated and required for normal spindle organization. Mol Biol Cell 1998; 9(suppl):130a.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Comizzoli, D. E. Wildt, and B. S. Pukazhenthi
Poor Centrosomal Function of Cat Testicular Spermatozoa Impairs Embryo Development In Vitro after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 252 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Nakamura, Y. Terada, V. Y. Rawe, S. Uehara, Y. Morito, T. Yoshimoto, M. Tachibana, T. Murakami, N. Yaegashi, and K. Okamura
A trial to restore defective human sperm centrosomal function
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1933 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J.-L. Liu, H. Kusakabe, C.-C. Chang, H. Suzuki, D. W. Schmidt, M. Julian, R. Pfeffer, C. L. Bormann, X. C. Tian, R. Yanagimachi, et al.
Freeze-Dried Sperm Fertilization Leads to Full-Term Development in Rabbits
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1776 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S.-i. Nakamura, Y. Terada, T. Horiuchi, C. Emuta, T. Murakami, N. Yaegashi, and K. Okamura
Human Sperm Aster Formation and Pronuclear Decondensation in Bovine Eggs Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using a Piezo-Driven Pipette: A Novel Assay for Human Sperm Centrosomal Function
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1359 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
N. Ogonuki, T. Sankai, K. Yagami, T. Shikano, S. Oda, S. Miyazaki, and A. Ogura
Activity of a Sperm-Borne Oocyte-Activating Factor in Spermatozoa and Spermatogenic Cells from Cynomolgus Monkeys and Its Localization after Oocyte Activation
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2001; 65(2): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Terada, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Schatten, G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS