Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.
Biology of Reproduction 62, 775-780 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Meiosis-Activating Sterol-Mediated Resumption of Meiosis in Mouse Oocytes In Vitro Is Influenced by Protein Synthesis Inhibition and Cholera Toxin1

Christian Grøndahl1,a, Monika Lesslb, Inger Færgea, Christa Hegele-Hartungb, Karsten Wassermanna, and Jan L. Ottesena

a Health Care Discovery, Pharmacology, Novo Nordisk A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark b Research Laboratories, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
To explore the possible signaling pathways of meiosis-activating sterol (MAS)-induced oocyte maturation and to elucidate whether the MAS pathway involves transcription or translation, arrested immature mouse oocytes were cultured with either the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide or the heteronuclear RNA inhibitors {alpha}-amanitin or actinomycin D, respectively. Moreover, the possible involvement of a G protein-coupled receptor mechanism in MAS-mediated oocyte maturation was explored by influencing oocyte maturation with cholera toxin (CT).

MAS-induced oocyte maturation was completely blocked by the addition of 50 µg/ml cycloheximide 4 h before the addition of MAS. Simultaneous addition of MAS and the protein synthesis inhibitor also significantly reduced the meiotic resumption compared to that in MAS-treated controls.

In contrast, neither of the treatment regimens to inhibit transcription of DNA to RNA was observed to have any effect on the MAS-induced resumption of meiosis.

CT was observed to inhibit MAS-induced, but not spontaneous, oocyte maturation in vitro, suggesting a putative involvement of G protein-coupled receptor mechanism in the MAS mode of action.

In conclusion, protein synthesis was found to be an essential requirement for maintaining the oocytes' responsiveness to MAS-induced resumption of meiosis, in contrast to transcription.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In the ovarian follicle, the oocyte is arrested in the prophase of the first meiotic division by factors in the follicular environment. Reproductive biology pioneers showed as early as the 1930s that the oocyte from a fully grown graafian follicle would resume meiosis and undergo spontaneous maturation if liberated from the inhibitory follicular environment [1]; however, oocytes from primordial and primary follicles are not competent to resume meiosis. During the process of follicular development the oocyte undergoes a dramatic growth phase in which its diameter enlarges 4- to 5-fold, during which the oocyte acquires the competence to complete the meiotic process [24]. The oocyte growth phase is characterized by an active DNA transcription and a buildup of maternally derived mRNA, and when this is completed, detectable transcription ceases [58]. The process of final oocyte maturation and fertilization involves a series of balanced nuclear, membranous, and cytoplasmic events whereby the resulting zygote enters initial embryonic development. These processes occur in the investigated species initially with only a very low level of de novo transcription of DNA to RNA and are predominantly governed by proteins translated from maternally derived stored mRNA until a burst of transcription occurs at the maternal-embryonic transition [6, 912].

Oocytes liberated from follicles have been observed in the case of a number of species to spontaneously mature in vitro without any stimulatory treatment [13]. It has been shown by many groups that cAMP is essential in the meiotic arrest and that a drop in the intracellular level of cAMP leads to the initiation of resumption of meiosis in mammalian oocytes [1418]. The spontaneous maturation of liberated mammalian oocytes can be blocked or delayed by addition of membrane-permeable derivatives of cAMP or phosphodiesterase inhibitors, preventing cAMP inside the oocytes from degrading [1921], or by increasing the level of cAMP by activators of the adenylate cyclase such as forskolin [22]. In contrast, several groups [17, 23] have presented evidence from follicle-enclosed oocytes that cAMP may have a dual role, being involved both in the arresting mechanisms and in mediating resumption of meiosis. Treatment of follicles with either gonadotropins or forskolin mediates a transient rise in cAMP levels inside the oocyte that stimulates oocyte maturation.

There is growing evidence, however, that two counteracting mechanisms exist in vivo: an inhibitory stimulus constantly preventing the oocyte from resuming meiosis and an activating stimulus downstream from the gonadotropic surge that is capable of overriding the inhibitory mechanism in vivo as the follicle approaches ovulation. The nature and origin of the inhibitory mechanism are not yet fully elucidated, although several observations point toward soluble factors originating from the follicular wall [24], the granulosa cells [25, 26] in the follicular fluid [27], and even the cumulus cells [28].

With regard to the activating principle, Byskov and coworkers [29] isolated a class of C-29 sterols from human follicular fluid and bull testicles that they designated meiosis-activating sterols (MAS) because of its maturational effect on hypoxanthine-arrested mouse oocytes cultured in vitro. The origin of these stimulating components also remains unclear but has been reported to be the cumulus or follicle cells [3032]. The synthesized sterol 4,4-dimethyl-5{alpha}-cholesta-8,14,24-trien-3ß-ol (FF-MAS), identical to that purified from human follicular fluid, has since been reported to stimulate the resumption of meiosis in a dose-dependent manner in mouse oocytes arrested with either hypoxanthine, isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX), or dibutyryl cAMP [33]. The Mangelsdorf group [34] recently observed FF-MAS to be a ligand for the orphan nuclear receptor LXR-{alpha}. Therefore, a possible hypothesis is that a putative nuclear MAS receptor has similarities at least in the ligand-binding domain to LXR-{alpha}, since our previous findings made it unlikely that LXR-{alpha} was the receptor [33].

The classical mechanism of all known mammalian nuclear receptors involves transcription [35]. Therefore, to explore some of the molecular mechanisms of MAS and possibly characteristics of a putative receptor, the aim of the present study was to elucidate whether the action of MAS involves transcription of DNA to RNA or translation of existing maternally derived RNA to protein.

Guanyl nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), because of their close coupling to cAMP turnover, have previously been investigated for their role in meiotic maturation [36, 37]. We therefore tested the effect of a G protein-activating toxin from Vibrio cholera (cholera toxin [CT]) on MAS-induced and spontaneous maturation in order to further characterize the MAS signaling pathway.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Oocyte Culture

The in vitro culture assay for resumption of meiosis in mouse oocytes was conducted as previously reported [33]. Briefly, oocytes were obtained from immature (21–24 day old) female mice (C57Bl/6J x DBA/2J F1-hybrids; M&B, Ry, Denmark) weighing 13–16 g, that were kept under controlled lighting and temperature. The mice received an i.p. injection of 0.2 ml gonadotropins (Gonal-F; Serono, Randolph, MA) containing 20 IU FSH, and 48 h later the animals were killed by cervical dislocation. The ovaries were dissected out, and the oocytes were isolated in Hx-medium (see below) under a stereomicroscope by manual rupture of the follicles using a pair of 27-gauge needles. Spherical naked oocytes (NkO) or cumulus-enclosed oocytes (CEO) displaying an intact germinal vesicle (GV) were selected and placed in {alpha}-minimum essential medium ({alpha}-MEM without ribonucleosides; Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD; cat. no. 22561) supplemented with 3 mM hypoxanthine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; cat. no. H-9377), 8 mg/ml human serum albumin (State Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark), 0.23 mM pyruvate (Sigma; cat. no. S-8636), 2 mM glutamine (Flow Sciences, Wilmington, NC; cat. no. 16–801), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Flow Sciences; cat. no. 16–700). This medium was designated Hx-medium.

Inhibition of Protein Synthesis

In order to evaluate the effect of the protein inhibitor cycloheximide on MAS-induced oocyte maturation, 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (Sigma; cat. no. C-7698) was added either 4 h before or simultaneously with the addition of 10 µM FF-MAS (synthesized at Novo Nordisk A/S). Thus, NkO and CEO, respectively, were cultured in 4-well multidishes (Nunclon; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) in which each well contained 0.4 ml of Hx-medium and 35–45 oocytes. Two different control wells (i.e., 35–45 oocytes cultured in identical medium) were always cultured simultaneously with two cycloheximide wells: an Hx control with no addition to the Hx-medium and a positive control with addition of 10 µM FF-MAS exclusively. The oocytes were cultured for 22 h after FF-MAS addition. By the end of the culture period, the numbers of oocytes with GV, germinal vesicle breakdown (GVB), and polar bodies (PB), respectively, were counted using a stereomicroscope (Wildt, Leica MZ 12; Milton Keynes, UK). The resumption of meiosis, defined as percentage of oocytes undergoing GVB per total number of oocytes in that well, was calculated as: %GVB = (number of GVB + number PB/total number oocytes) x 100. The experiment described was performed 3 times and the results presented as mean ± SD.

Inhibition of Transcription

To evaluate the involvement of transcription in MAS-induced oocyte maturation, NkO or CEO were cultured as described above with the same controls and treated either 4 h before or simultaneously with the addition of 10 µM FF-MAS with either 50 or 100 µg/ml {alpha}-amanitin (a potent polymerase II inhibitor; Sigma; cat. no. A-2263) or 10 or 50 µg/ml actinomycin D (a potent transcription inhibitor; Sigma; cat. no. A-1410). The experiment described was performed 3 times and the results presented as mean ± SD.

Inhibition of G Proteins by CT

To evaluate the effect of CT (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA; cat. no. 227035-S) on MAS-induced maturation as well as spontaneous maturation, NkO were cultured with the addition of CT in the range from 0.1 to 10 µg/ml to either Hx-medium with 10 µM MAS or Hx-free medium. Control groups were cultured simultaneously in identical medium without CT. The oocytes were cultured and assessed as described above. The experiment described was performed 3 times and results presented as mean ± SD.

Statistics

In the study of protein synthesis and transcription inhibition, the percentages of oocytes showing GVB were examined by a one-way ANOVA. When ANOVA yielded significance, pairwise comparison (Student's t-test) between treatment groups and controls was conducted. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant.

In the study of CT inhibition of G proteins, data from three experiments for each treatment were pooled; and because of higher variance in oocyte numbers, the percentage of oocytes reaching GVB (mean ± SD) was tested for statistically significant difference for each CT concentration by chi-square test. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered to be significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cycloheximide Culture

Four hours of cycloheximide pretreatment significantly influenced the NkO responsiveness to MAS. Simultaneous treatment with MAS and the translation inhibitor likewise reduced the NkO response to MAS by around 50% (Fig. 1). The level of spontaneously maturing oocytes in the hypoxanthine-arrested control oocytes was observed to be 15.9 ± 3.1 %GVB (mean ± SD), and the MAS-induced oocytes were observed to respond at the level of 81.9 ± 2.8 %GVB (mean ± SD). The oocytes pretreated for 4 h with cycloheximide and then challenged with MAS were observed to achieve 14.6 ± 9.9 %GVB (mean ± SD); this value was significantly lower than that for the MAS-treated positive controls (Fig. 1) and not significantly different from the unstimulated Hx control level. Simultaneous treatment with cycloheximide and MAS resulted in 43.9 ± 1.4 %GVB (mean ± SD), which was also significantly lower than in positive MAS-treated controls but significantly higher than in Hx controls. Spontaneous maturation in Hx-free medium was observed to be 84 ± 6.1 %GVB (mean ± SD); this value was not significantly affected by cycloheximide treatment (68.5 ± 2.5 %GVB) (Fig. 1).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. The effect of cycloheximide treatment simultaneous with or 4 h before FF-MAS-mediated oocyte maturation on NkO cultured in vitro. n (number of oocytes) = 245, 139, 142, 262, 125, and 139 for Hx controls; FF-MAS positive controls, 4 h; cycloheximide + FF-MAS, 0 h; cycloheximide + FF-MAS, 4 h; Spontaneous; and Spontaneous + cycloheximide, respectively. Bars and error bars represent mean %GVB ± SD of three consecutive trials. "a" indicates that treatment group was significantly different from Hx controls; "b" indicates that treatment group was significantly different from FF-MAS-treated positive controls as assessed by ANOVA followed by pairwise comparison using Student's t-test. Note that the FF-MAS (10 µM)-mediated resumption of meiosis was significantly influenced by cycloheximide (50 µg/ml) at simultaneous administration of cycloheximide and FF-MAS and completely blocked by 4-h pretreatment with cycloheximide (4h), in contrast to spontaneous maturation that was unaffected by cycloheximide. Cyc.H., cycloheximide

In the CEO there was a tendency, although nonsignificant, for 4-h pretreatment with the protein inhibitor cycloheximide to lower the %GVB. Thus, treatment of CEO with cycloheximide and FF-MAS yielded a less striking effect than in NkO (Fig. 2).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. The effect of cycloheximide treatment simultaneous with FF-MAS-mediated oocyte maturation on CEO cultured in vitro. n (number of oocytes) = 124, 116, and 81 for Hx controls, FF-MAS positive controls, and FF-MAS + cycloheximide (4h), respectively. Note that cycloheximide showed a tendency to influence FF-MAS-induced oocyte maturation in CEO; however, the drop in %GVB was not significant. Cyc.H., cycloheximide

In all cycloheximide-treated groups, the frequency of PB formation was zero, which was also observed in spontaneously maturing oocytes cultured with cycloheximide in medium without hypoxanthine.

Inhibition of Transcription

We observed no effect of MAS-induced or spontaneous resumption of meiosis using inhibitors of transcription, regardless of whether the inhibitory agent was {alpha}-amanitin or actinomycin D and regardless of the protocol (0-, 4-, or 24-h pretreatment), when culturing NkO in vitro (Figs. 3 and 4). Furthermore, no significant difference from MAS-positive controls in the frequency of PB formation was observed in any treatment group.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. The effect of {alpha}-amanitin treatment simultaneous with or 4 h before FF-MAS-mediated oocyte maturation on NkO cultured in vitro. n (number of oocytes) = 119, 124, 160, 154, 115, 115, and 117 for Hx controls;, FF-MAS positive controls;, {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h; {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 0 h; {alpha}-amanitin 100 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h; {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 24 h; and {alpha}-amanitin 100 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 24 h, respectively. Bars and error bars represent mean ± SD %GVB of three consecutive trials. Note that there was no significant difference from positive controls treated with FF-MAS alone in any of the {alpha}-amanitin treatment groups (A[50] = {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml; A[100] = {alpha}-amanitin 100 µg/ml) by ANOVA

CEO were likewise cultured as described above with {alpha}-amanitin pretreatment for 4 h at concentrations of 50 µg/ml and 100 µg/ml before addition of MAS, together with positive and negative controls. In the negative controls (Hx control), the resumption of meiosis was observed to be 13.4 ± 5.2 %GVB (mean ± SD). The positive control level of 10 µM MAS was observed to 55.8 ± 4.2 %GVB (mean ± SD). Four hours of pretreatment with {alpha}-amanitin before MAS addition significantly increased the MAS-mediated resumption of meiosis to 86.4 ± 6.5 %GVB (mean ± SD) and 83.4 ± 9.4 with addition of 50 and 100 µg /ml {alpha}-amanitin, respectively (Fig. 5).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. The effect of {alpha}-amanitin treatment 4 h before MAS-mediated oocyte maturation on CEO cultured in vitro. n (number of oocytes) = 196, 190, 191, and 195 for Hx controls; FF-MAS positive controls; {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h; and {alpha}-amanitin 100 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h. Bars and error bars represent mean ± SD %GVB of three consecutive trials, and asterisk indicates that treatment group was significant different from FF-MAS-treated positive controls as assessed by ANOVA followed by pairwise comparison using Student's t-test. Notice that the FF-MAS-mediated resumption of meiosis was significantly boosted in both {alpha}-amanitin treatment groups (A[50]: {alpha}-amanitin 50 µg/ml; A[100]: {alpha}-amanitin 100 µg/ml)

Effect of CT on MAS-Induced and Spontaneous Maturation

When culturing NkO in Hx-medium, it was observed that CT (2.5–10.0 µg/ml) was able to inhibit MAS-induced %GVB significantly in comparison to Hx control (Fig. 6). This was in contrast to spontaneously matured oocytes cultured in Hx-free medium, where it was observed that CT was not able to inhibit the spontaneous maturation (91.4 ± 2.8 vs. 86.1 ± 1.0 %GVB mean ± SD, Fig. 6). These findings were influenced neither by timing of CT supplementation in relation to onset of culture (4-h CT preincubation or simultaneously with MAS addition) nor by the dose of CT.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. The effect of CT on spontaneous and MAS-mediated oocyte maturation in NkO cultured in vitro in either Hx-free medium (spontaneous) or Hx-medium (FF-MAS). n (number of oocytes) = 118, 100, 119, 124, 97, 105, and 115 for Spontaneous; Spontaneous + CT 2.5 µg/ml; FF-MAS positive control; Hx control; FF-MAS + CT 2.5 µg/ml, 0 h; FF-MAS + CT 10.0 µg/ml, 0 h; and CT 10.0 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h, respectively. Bars and error bars represent mean ± SD %GVB of three consecutive trials. Notice that with chi-square test, significant effects (asterisks) of any CT treatment were observed in the FF-MAS-mediated oocyte maturation in contrast to no significant effect of CT on spontaneous maturation


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An active protein synthesis was observed to be essential in order for the in vitro-cultured hypoxanthine-arrested mouse oocytes to respond to the addition of MAS with resumption of meiosis. This was in contrast to an active transcription, which in our study was found not to be essential for the MAS-induced resumption at all in NkO, regardless of whether the transcription inhibitor was added simultaneously with MAS or 4 or 24 h before the addition of MAS.

Full progression of the meiotic process to the second metaphase stage was never observed in the cycloheximide-treated MAS-mediated oocytes. Spontaneously maturing oocytes treated with cycloheximide did resume meiosis; however, they were also observed to arrest in the first metaphase, in accordance with previous reports [3840]. The susceptibility of spontaneous oocyte maturation to protein synthesis inhibition has been observed to be very species specific. Protein synthesis has been observed to be essential for spontaneous maturation in large domestic species such as pigs and cattle, whereas in mice, GVB does occur in the presence of cycloheximide or other protein synthesis inhibitors [3943]. Yet Downs [40] observed in oocytes from mice that if protein synthesis was blocked from 2 to 6 h while the CEO were arrested by IBMX, the IBMX could be washed away and cycloheximide alone was sufficient to prevent spontaneous maturation from occurring. Likewise, FSH- or epidermal growth factor-mediated resumption of meiosis was completely blocked by protein synthesis inhibitors. These findings suggest that the mechanism of MAS-mediated GVB is somewhat similar to the mechanism of hormonally induced resumption of meiosis in requiring de novo protein synthesis in mouse oocytes. This is, however, in contrast to spontaneous maturation that does not require protein synthesis. The interpretation of our data could be either that a certain level of protein synthesis is essential for the signaling pathway of MAS, or that a rapid receptor turnover makes it essential with an ongoing de novo protein synthesis inside the oocyte. It is possible that MAS-mediated maturation and spontaneous maturation are quite similar in the requirement for de novo protein synthesis in order to progress to second metaphases, since cycloheximide effectively prevents PB formation both in hypoxanthine-arrested, spontaneously maturing and in FF-MAS-induced oocytes. In fish, the induction of oocyte maturation by 17{alpha},20ß-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one has been reported to be similarly inhibited by protein synthesis inhibition with cycloheximide and unaffected by transcription inhibition with actinomycin D [44].

In cultured intact follicles, both LH and FSH have been observed to induce maturation of the oocytes; however, in cumulus-enclosed hypoxanthine-arrested oocytes, only FSH, in contrast to LH, has activity to induce resumption of meiosis [45]. Also in line with our finding, the first 2 h of the LH-induced resumption of meiosis in follicle-enclosed oocytes has been reported to be sensitive to protein synthesis inhibitors but not to transcription inhibitors [45].

The observation in NkO of the involvement of transcription of DNA to RNA in progression of final maturation revealed that transcription was not an essential requirement for MAS-mediated GVB and furthermore that PB formation was also unaffected.

Interestingly, in CEO, in contrast to NkO, {alpha}-amanitin did have an effect on MAS-mediated GVB, since it boosted the percentage of oocytes resuming meiosis significantly. Noticeably, MAS does not have the same efficacy on naked and cumulus-enclosed oocytes in our laboratory, which has been reported previously [33]. This effect of {alpha}-amanitin could be interpreted as an involvement of active transcription in the putative inhibitory mechanism that is communicated from the cumulus cells to the oocytes.

After removing the cumulus cells from oocytes and inhibiting heteronuclear RNA synthesis with {alpha}-amanitin, it has been observed that the oocytes spontaneously mature and reach at least the first metaphase stage in cattle and pigs [46, 47]. However, in the cumulus-enclosed pig and cattle oocytes, inhibition of transcription early in the culture period markedly reduced the spontaneous maturation, suggesting the requirement for RNA synthesis in the cumulus cells [43, 4649]. It could therefore be speculated that the formation of a meiosis-active substance made in the cumulus cells, hypothetically MAS, requires RNA transcription in the cumulus cells.

CT was observed to significantly inhibit MAS-mediated but not spontaneous oocyte maturation in mouse oocytes. CT catalyzes ADP-ribosylation of the {alpha} subunit of Gs, one of several families of heterotrimer G proteins, resulting in the constitutive activation of adenylate cyclase [50, 51]. In naked rodent oocytes, CT has been observed to partly prevent the drop in intracellular cAMP associated with spontaneous maturation [16], whereas spontaneous maturation is not inhibited [15, 16, 52]. Our finding suggests that the G protein-binding receptor mechanism is involved in MAS signaling. In Xenopus laevis oocytes, the progesterone-mediated maturation and accompanying decrease in intracellular levels of cAMP [53] are mediated via modulation of membrane-bound adenylate cyclase and can likewise be inhibited by CT [54, 55].

In conclusion, an active protein synthesis was found to be an essential requirement for maintaining the oocytes' responsiveness to MAS-induced resumption of meiosis, in contrast to active transcription. The signaling pathway is still speculative; however, these data could be interpreted to suggest either that a certain level of protein synthesis is essential for the signaling pathway of MAS or that a rapid receptor turnover makes it essential with an ongoing de novo protein synthesis inside the oocyte. In either case it is unlikely that the MAS signaling mechanism involves a nuclear receptor dependent on active transcription. Finally, the CT results could be interpreted as suggesting that this signaling mechanism involves G protein-coupled receptor mechanisms. Further investigations need to be conducted in order to reveal the details regarding the signaling pathway of MAS.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. The effect of actinomycin D on FF-MAS-induced oocyte maturation. Actinomycin D was added 4 h before MAS-mediated oocyte maturation in CEO cultured in vitro. n (number of oocytes) = 141, 140, 140, and 142 for Hx controls; FF-MAS positive controls; actinomycin D 10 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h; and actinomycin D 50 µg/ml + FF-MAS, 4 h. Bars and error bars represent mean ± SD %GVB of three consecutive trials; lack of asterisk indicates that treatment group was not significantly different from FF-MAS-treated positive controls as assessed by ANOVA followed by pairwise comparison using Student's t-test. Notice that the FF-MAS-mediated resumption of meiosis was unaffected in any of the treatment groups (Act.D[10]: actinomycin D 10 µg/ml; Act.D[50]: actinomycin D 50 µg/ml)


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors wish to thank Ms. Elene J. Carlsen, Ms. Tina Olesen, and Ms. Birgitte W. Fetterlein for skillful technical assistance conducting the oocyte culture. Mr. Jesper Damgaard is thanked for constructive guidance concerning {alpha}-amanitin and cycloheximide cultures.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 8 March 1999.

1 Correspondence: Christian Grøndahl, Health Care Discovery, Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Park, G 8.1.06. Må, DK-2760 Maaloev, Denmark. FAX: 45 44 43 45 37; chgr{at}novo.dk Back

Accepted: October 15, 1999.

Received: January 14, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Pincus G, Enzmann EV. The comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. I. The activation of ovarian eggs. J Exp Med 1935; 62:655–675.
  2. Eppig JJ, Schroeder AC, O'Brien MJ. Developmental capacity of mouse oocytes matured in vitro: effects of gonadotrophic stimulation, follicular origin and oocyte size. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 95:119–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Tsuji K, Sowa M, Nakano R. Relationship between human oocyte maturation and different follicular sizes. Biol Reprod 1985; 32:413–417.[Abstract]
  4. Lonergan P, Monaghan P, Rizos D, Boland MP, Gordon I. Effect of follicle size on bovine oocyte quality and developmental competence following maturation, fertilization, and culture in-vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 37:48–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Sorensen RA, Wassarman PM. Relationship between growth and meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev Biol 1976; 50:531–536.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Crozet N. Nucleolar structure and RNA synthesis in mammalian oocytes. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1989; 38:9–16.[Medline]
  7. Paynton BV, Bachvarova R. Polyadenylation and deadenylation of maternal messenger-RNAs during oocyte growth and maturation in the mouse. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 37:172–180.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Schultz RM. Molecular aspects of mammalian oocyte growth and maturation. In: Rossant J, Pedersen RA (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Mammalian Embryonic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986: 195–237.
  9. Plante L, Plante C, Shepherd DL, King WA. Cleavage and h-3 uridine incorporation in bovine embryos of high in-vitro developmental potential. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 39:375–383.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Grøndahl C, Hyttel P. Nucleologenesis and ribonucleic acid synthesis in preimplantation equine embryos. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:769–774.[Abstract]
  11. Hyttel P, Assey RJ, Viuff D, Grøndahl C. Transcriptional regulation of oocyte development, fertilization and initial embryonic-development in cattle. Reprod Domest Anim 1993; 28:154–156.
  12. Crozet N, Kanka J, Motlik J, Fulka J. Nucleolar fine structure and RNA synthesis in bovine oocytes from antral follicles. Gamete Res 1986; 14:65–73.
  13. Edwards RG. Maturation in vitro of mouse, sheep, cow, pig, rhesus monkey and human ovarian oocytes. Nature 1965; 208:349–351.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Eppig JJ. The participation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) in the regulation of meiotic maturation of oocytes in the laboratory mouse. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 38:3–8.
  15. Schultz RM, Montgomery RR, Belanoff JR. Regulation of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation: implication of a decrease in oocyte cAMP and protein dephosphorylation in commitment to resume meiosis. Dev Biol 1983; 97:264–273.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Vivarelli E, Conti M, De Felici M, Siracusa G. Meiotic resumption and intracellular cAMP levels in mouse oocytes treated with compounds which act on cAMP metabolism. Cell Differ 1983; 12:271–276.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Yoshimura Y, Nakamura Y, Ando M, Jinno M, Oda T, Karube M, Koyama N, Nanno T. Stimulatory role of cyclic adenosine monophosphate as a mediator of meiotic resumption in rabbit oocytes. Endocrinology 1992; 131:351–356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Aberdam E, Hanski E, Dekel N. Maintenance of meiotic arrest in isolated rat oocytes by the invasive adenylate cyclase of Bordetella pertussis. Biol Reprod 1987; 36:530–535.[Abstract]
  19. Cho WK, Stern S, Biggers JD. Inhibitory effect of dibutyric cAMP on mouse oocyte maturation in vitro. J Exp Zool 1974; 187:383–386.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Downs SM, Daniel SAJ, Bornslaeger EA, Hoppe PC, Eppig JJ. Maintenance of meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes by purines: modulation of cAMP levels and cAMP phosphodiesterase activity. Gamete Res 1989; 23:323–334.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Tornell J, Hillensjo T. Effect of cAMP on the isolated human oocyte cumulus complex. Hum Reprod 1993; 8:737–739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Dekel N, Aberdam E, Sherizly I. Spontaneous maturation in vitro of cumulus-enclosed rat oocytes is inhibited by forskolin. Biol Reprod 1984; 31:244–250.[Abstract]
  23. Dekel N, Galiani D, Sherizly I. Dissociation between the inhibitory and the stimulatory action of cAMP on maturation of rat oocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1988; 56:115–121.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. De Loos FAM, Zeinstra E, Bevers MM. Follicular wall maintains meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes cultured in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 39:162–165.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kalous J, Sutovsky P, Rimkevicova Z, Shioya Y, Lie B, Motlik J. Pig membrana granulosa cells prevent resumption of meiosis in cattle oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 34:58–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hinrichs K, Martin MG, Schmidt AL, Friedman PP. Effect of follicular components on meiotic arrest and resumption in horse oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 104:149–156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Dostal J, Pavlok A. Isolation and characterization of maturation inhibiting compound in bovine follicular-fluid. Reprod Nutr Dev 1996; 36:681–690.
  28. Downs SM. Factors affecting the resumption of meiotic maturation in mammalian oocytes. Theriogenology 1993; 39:65–79.
  29. Byskov AG, Andersen CY, Nordholm L, Thøgersen H, Guoliang X, Wassmann O, Andersen JV, Guddal E, Roed T. Chemical-structure of sterols that activate oocyte meiosis. Nature 1995; 374:559–562.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Downs SM, Daniel SAJ, Eppig JJ. Induction of maturation in cumulus cell-enclosed mouse oocytes by follicle-stimulating hormone and epidermal growth factor: evidence for a positive stimulus of somatic cell origin. J Exp Zool 1988; 245:86–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Byskov AG, Andersen CY, Hossaini A, Guoliang X. Cumulus cells of oocyte-cumulus complexes secrete a meiosis-activating substance when stimulated with FSH. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 46:296–305.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Guoliang X, Byskov AG, Andersen CY. Cumulus cells secrete a meiosis-inducing substance by stimulation with forskolin and dibutyric cyclic adenosine-monophosphate. Mol Reprod Dev 1994; 39:17–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Grøndahl C, Ottesen JL, Lessl M, Faarup P, Murray A, Grønvald FC, Hegele-Hartung C, Ahnfelt-Rønne I. Meiosis-activating sterol promotes resumption of meiosis in mouse oocytes cultured in vitro in contrast to related oxysterols. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1297–1302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Janowski BA, Willy PJ, Devi TR, Falck JR, Mangelsdorf DJ. An oxysterol signalling pathway mediated by the nuclear receptor LXR{alpha}. Nature 1996; 383:728–731.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schütz G, Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P, Evans RM. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 1995; 83:835–839.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Downs SM, Buccione R, Eppig JJ. Modulation of meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes by guanyl nucleotides and modifiers of G-proteins. J Exp Zool 1992; 262:391–404.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Jones J, Schultz RM. Pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation of a G protein in mouse oocytes, eggs, and preimplantation embryos: developmental changes and possible functional roles. Dev Biol 1990; 39:250–262.
  38. Schultz RM, Wassarman PM. Specific changes in the pattern of protein synthesis during meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977; 74:538–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Kanmera S, Sakakibara R, Ishiguro M. Inhibition of polar body formation in mouse denuded oocytes cultured in-vitro by protein-synthesis inhibitors. Biol Pharm Bull 1995; 18:1255–1258.[Medline]
  40. Downs SM. Protein synthesis inhibitors prevent both spontaneous and hormone dependent maturation of isolated mouse oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 27:235–243.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Fulka J Jr, Motlik J, Fulka J. Effect of cycloheximide on nuclear maturation of pig and mouse oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 77:281–285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sirard MA, Florman HM, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, Barnes FL, Sims ML, First NL. Timing of nuclear progression and protein synthesis necessary for meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:1257–1263.[Abstract]
  43. Osborn JC, Moor RM. Time-dependent effects of alpha-amanitin on nuclear maturation and protein synthesis in mammalian oocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1983; 73:317–338.[Medline]
  44. Balamurugan K, Haider S. Effects of actinomycin-D and cycloheximide on gonadotropin or 17-{alpha},20-ß-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one-induced in-vitro maturation in oocytes of the catfish, clarias-batrachus. J Biosci 1995; 20:151–156.
  45. Lindner HR, Tsafriri A, Lieberman ME, Zor U, Koch Y, Bauminger S, Barnea A. Gonadotrophin action on cultured graafian follicles: induction of maturation division of the mammalian oocyte and differentiation of the luteal cell. Recent Prog Horm Res 1974; 30:79–138.
  46. Tatemoto H, Terada T. Time-dependent effects of cycloheximide and alpha-amanitin on meiotic resumption and progression in bovine follicular oocytes. Theriogenology 1995; 43:1107–1113.
  47. Meinecke B, Meinecke-Tillmann S. Effects of alpha-amanitin on nuclear maturation of porcine oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 98:195–201.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Mattioli M, Galeati G, Bacci ML, Barboni B. Changes in maturation-promoting activity in the cytoplasm of pig oocytes throughout maturation. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30:119–125.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Kastrop PM, Hulshof SC, Bevers MM, Destree OH, Kruip TA. The effects of alpha-amanitin and cycloheximide on nuclear progression, protein synthesis, and phosphorylation during bovine oocyte maturation in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 28:249–254.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Cassel D, Pfeuffer T. Mechanism of cholera toxin action: covalent modification of the guanyl nucleotide-binding protein of the adenylate cyclase system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:2669–2673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Moss J, Vaughan M. Activation of adenylate cyclase by choleragen. Ann Biol Anim Biochem Biophys 1979; 48:581–600.
  52. Olsiewski PJ, Beers WH. cAMP synthesis in the rat oocyte. Dev Biol 1983; 100:287–293.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Speaker MG, Butcher FR. Cyclic nucleotide fluctuations during steroid induced meiotic maturation of frog oocytes. Nature 1977; 267:848–850.[CrossRef][Medline]
  54. Maller JL, Butcher FR, Krebs EG. Early effect of progesterone on levels of cyclic adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate in Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 1977; 254:579–582.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Schorderet-Slatkine S, Schorderet M, Boquet P, Godeau F, Baulieu EE. Progesterone-induced meiosis in Xenopus laevis oocytes: a role for cAMP at the "maturation-promoting factor" level. Cell 1978; 15:1269–1275.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
H M Picton, S E Harris, W Muruvi, and E L Chambers
The in vitro growth and maturation of follicles
Reproduction, December 1, 2008; 136(6): 703 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
K. F. Tacer, D. Kuzman, M. Seliskar, D. Pompon, and D. Rozman
TNF-{alpha} interferes with lipid homeostasis and activates acute and proatherogenic processes
Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 216 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cukurcam, I. Betzendahl, G. Michel, E. Vogt, C. Hegele-Hartung, B. Lindenthal, and U. Eichenlaub-Ritter
Influence of follicular fluid meiosis-activating sterol on aneuploidy rate and precocious chromatid segregation in aged mouse oocytes
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 815 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. M Mehlmann
Stops and starts in mammalian oocytes: recent advances in understanding the regulation of meiotic arrest and oocyte maturation
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 791 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. Cotman, D. Jezek, K. F. Tacer, R. Frangez, and D. Rozman
A Functional Cytochrome P450 Lanosterol 14{alpha}-Demethylase CYP51 Enzyme in the Acrosome: Transport through the Golgi and Synthesis of Meiosis-Activating Sterols
Endocrinology, March 1, 2004; 145(3): 1419 - 1426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Grondahl, J. Breinholt, P. Wahl, A. Murray, T. H. Hansen, I. Faerge, C. E. Stidsen, K. Raun, and C. Hegele-Hartung
Physiology of meiosis-activating sterol: endogenous formation and mode of action
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 122 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
K. F. Tacer, T. B. Haugen, M. Baltsen, N. Debeljak, and D. Rozman
Tissue-specific transcriptional regulation of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway leads to accumulation of testis meiosis-activating sterol (T-MAS)
J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 82 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Baltsen
Gonadotropin-Induced Accumulation of 4,4-Dimethylsterols in Mouse Ovaries and Its Temporal Relation to Meiosis
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1743 - 1750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. Faerge, B. Terry, J. Kalous, P. Wahl, M. Lessl, J.L. Ottesen, P. Hyttel, and C. Grondahl
Resumption of Meiosis Induced by Meiosis-Activating Sterol Has a Different Signal Transduction Pathway than Spontaneous Resumption of Meiosis in Denuded Mouse Oocytes Cultured In Vitro
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2001; 65(6): 1751 - 1758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Hegele-Hartung, M. Grützner, M. Lessl, C. Grøndahl, J. L. Ottesen, and M. Brännström
Activation of Meiotic Maturation in Rat Oocytes After Treatment with Follicular Fluid Meiosis-Activating Sterol In Vitro and Ex Vivo
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2001; 64(2): 418 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
I. Faerge, C. Grøndahl, J.L. Ottesen, and P. Hyttel
Autoradiographic Localization of Specific Binding of Meiosis-Activating Sterol to Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes from Marmoset, Cow, and Mouse
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2001; 64(2): 527 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. M. Downs, B. Ruan, and G. J. Schroepfer Jr
Meiosis-Activating Sterol and the Maturation of Isolated Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2001; 64(1): 80 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Grøndahl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Ottesen, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS