Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.
Biology of Reproduction 62, 1315-1321 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Articles

Progesterone Modulation of Osteopontin Gene Expression in the Ovine Uterus1

Greg A. Johnsona,b, Thomas E. Spencera,b, Robert C. Burghardta,c, Kristin M. Taylora,b, C. Allison Graya,b, and Fuller W. Bazer2,,a,b

a Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, b Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University System Health Center; Departments of Animal Science and c Veterinary Anatomy & Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2471


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Osteopontin (OPN) is an acidic phosphorylated glycoprotein component of the extracellular matrix that binds to integrins at the cell surface to promote cell-cell attachment and cell spreading. This matrix constituent is a ligand that could potentially bind integrins on trophectoderm and endometrium to facilitate superficial implantation and placentation. OPN mRNA increases in the endometrial glandular epithelium (GE) of early-pregnant ewes, and OPN protein is secreted into the uterine lumen. Therefore, progesterone and/or interferon-tau (IFN{tau}) may regulate OPN expression in the uterine GE. Cyclic ewes were ovariectomized and fitted with intrauterine (i.u.) catheters on Day 5 and treated daily with steroids (i.m.) and protein (i.u.) as follows: 1) progesterone (P, Days 5–24) and control serum proteins (CX, Days 11–24); 2) P and ZK 136.317 (ZK; progesterone receptor [PR] antagonist, Days 11–24) and CX proteins; 3) P and recombinant ovine IFN{tau} (roIFN{tau}, Days 11–24); or 4) P and ZK and roIFN{tau}. All ewes were hysterectomized on Day 25. Progesterone induced the expression of endometrial OPN mRNA in the GE and increased secretion of a 45-kDa OPN protein from endometrial explants maintained in culture for 24 h. Administration of ZK ablated progesterone effects. Intrauterine infusion of roIFN{tau} did not affect OPN gene expression or secretion in any of the steroid treatments. Interestingly, OPN mRNA-positive GE cells lacked detectable PR expression, although PR were detected in the stroma. Results indicate that progesterone regulates OPN expression in GE through a complex mechanism that includes PR down-regulation, and we suggest the possible involvement of a progesterone-induced stromal cell-derived growth factor(s) that acts as a progestamedin.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Osteopontin (OPN) is an acidic phosphorylated glycoprotein component of the extracellular matrix [1]. Originally isolated from bone [2], OPN has been detected in epithelia and in secretions of many tissues, including the gastrointestinal tract, thyroid, kidney, breast, testes, oviduct, uterus, trophoblast, and placenta [37]. OPN binds to {alpha}vß3, {alpha}vß1, {alpha}vß5, and {alpha}4ß1 integrin heterodimers via its Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequence [810] to promote cell adhesion, spreading, and migration [11]. It also stimulates calcium transport and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase activity [5, 12].

During the periimplantation period, the endometrial glands produce histotroph that nourishes and sustains the conceptus (embryo and associated membranes) [13]. It is hypothesized that these secretions support conceptus remodeling, adhesion, implantation, and placentation. OPN is a component of histotroph because it increases in uterine flushings from pregnant ewes between Days 11 and 17 [6], a period that corresponds to the adherence and attachment phases of early implantation. Secreted OPN may then bind integrin heterodimers expressed by trophectoderm and uterus to 1) stimulate changes in morphology of conceptus extraembryonic placental membranes and 2) induce adhesion between luminal epithelium (LE) and trophectoderm essential for implantation and placentation [6]. Although OPN mRNA increases only in the endometrial glandular epithelium (GE) of pregnant ewes [14], OPN protein is localized on the apical aspect of the endometrial LE, GE, and conceptus trophectoderm [6].

While the temporal and spatial expression of OPN during the ovine estrous cycle and pregnancy has been described [6, 14], it is not yet clear whether the regulation of OPN gene expression and/or secretion by GE is controlled by progesterone and/or interferon-tau (IFN{tau}). In the present study, a well-characterized steroid-treated uterine-infused ovariectomized ewe model [15] was utilized to elucidate the regulation of OPN gene expression and protein secretion by GE.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Experimental Design

Experimental and surgical procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Agricultural Animal Care and Use Committee of Texas A&M University (Animal Use Protocol AG-239AG). Mature western range ewes of primarily Rambouillet breeding were observed daily for estrous behavior using vasectomized rams and had exhibited at least two estrous cycles of normal duration (16–18 days) prior to experimental manipulation. Sixteen cyclic ewes (Day 0 = estrus) were ovariectomized and fitted with uterine catheters on Day 5 [15] and then assigned randomly (n = 4 ewes per treatment) to receive daily i.m. injections of steroids and intrauterine (i.u.) infusions of protein as follows: 1) 50 mg progesterone (P, Days 5–24) and 200 µg control serum proteins (CX; ovine serum proteins, Days 11–24); 2) P and 75 mg ZK 137.316 (ZK; progesterone receptor antagonist, Days 11–24; generously provided by Dr. Kristof Chwalisz, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) and CX proteins; 3) P and recombinant ovine IFN{tau} (roIFN{tau}; 2 x 107 antiviral units, Days 11–24) [16]; or 4) P and ZK and IFN{tau}. The experimental design is summarized in Figure 1A. Both uterine horns of each ewe received twice-daily (0700 h and 1900 h) infusions of either CX protein (50 µg/horn per injection) or IFN{tau} (5 x 106 antiviral units/horn per injection). Steroids were administered daily (0700 h) in a total volume of 1 ml corn oil vehicle. All ewes were hysterectomized on Day 25.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Experimental design (A) and effects of treatment on steady-state levels of OPN mRNA in ovine endometrium (B). A) Experimental design. Sixteen Day 5 cyclic ewes (4 ewes per treatment) were ovariectomized, fitted with uterine catheters, and given daily i.m. injections of steroids (Days 5–24 P alone or Days 5–25 P and Days 11–25 ZK) and i.u. infusions of protein (Days 11–25 CX or roIFN{tau}) as follows: 1) 50 mg P + 200 µg control proteins (P-CX); 2) P + 75 mg ZK136.317 (a PR antagonist) + CX (P+ZK-CX); 3) P + roIFN{tau} (2 x 107 antiviral units) (P-IFN); or 4) (P+ZK-IFN). Ewes were hysterectomized on Day 25. B) Slot-blot hybridization analysis of total cellular OPN mRNA indicated that progesterone increased steady-state levels of endometrial OPN mRNA (P-CX vs. P+ZK-CX, P < 0.01; P-IFN vs. P+ZK-IFN, P < 0.01)

Several sections (1–1.5 cm) of the uterine wall from the middle portion of each uterine horn were fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) or snap frozen in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Miles, Oneata, NY). The remaining endometrium was dissected from myometrium and frozen in liquid nitrogen or placed into warm Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)/F12 culture medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for explant culture. Endometrial explant cultures, derived from fresh endometrium (500 mg/culture) that was minced with scalpel blades into small pieces (2–3 cubic mm), were placed into culture dishes (100 x 15 mm) with 5 ml of DMEM/F12 culture medium containing penicillin G (100 IU/ml), streptomycin (0.1 mg/ml), and amphotericin B (0.25 µg/ml; Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY). Cultures were incubated for 24 h with rocking under an atmosphere of 45% nitrogen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 50% oxygen.

Slot-Blot Hybridization Analysis

Total cellular RNA was isolated from frozen endometrium using Trizol reagent (Gibco-BRL). For each ewe, denatured total cellular RNA (20 µg) was hybridized with radiolabeled antisense ovine OPN [14] or 18S rRNA (pT718S; Ambion, Austin, TX) cRNA probes generated by in vitro transcription with [{alpha}-32P]UTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) as previously described [15]. Radioactivity in each slot was quantified by electronic autoradiography using an Instant Imager (Packard, Meriden, CT) and expressed as total counts.

In Situ Hybridization Analysis

OPN mRNA was localized in paraffin-embedded uterine tissue sections by in situ hybridization analysis as previously described [14]. Deparaffinized, rehydrated, and deproteinated uterine sections (4–8 µm) were hybridized with radiolabeled antisense or sense ovine OPN cRNA probes using in vitro transcription with [{alpha}-35S]UTP. Autoradiography was performed using Kodak (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion and exposed at 4°C for 5 days (as judged by autoradiographs), developed, counterstained with Harris' modified hematoxylin (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ), dehydrated through a graded series of alcohol to xylene, and coverslipped [17].

Western Blot Analysis

Endometrium was thawed and homogenized, and concentration of protein was determined [6]. The medium from explant cultures was harvested and dialyzed, and protein concentrations were determined using a Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) as previously described [9]. Proteins in endometrial extracts (100 µg) or explant culture medium (60 µg) were denatured in Laemmli buffer, separated on 10% (total monomer) SDS-PAGE gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose [18]. Blots were then blocked, incubated with a cocktail containing rabbit polyclonal antibodies against recombinant human OPN (anti-hOPN; LF-123 and LF-124; 5 µg/ml, generously provided by Dr. Marian F. Young, NIH, Bethesda, MD) [19] or normal rabbit serum (5 µg/ml) followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:15 000 dilution of 1 mg/ml stock; KPL, Bethesda, MD). Immunoreactive proteins were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Life Sciences, Rochester, NY) as previously described [6].

Immunohistochemistry

OPN protein was localized in frozen uterine tissue sections (4–8 µm) by immunofluorescence staining as previously described [6]. Frozen sections were fixed in -20°C methanol, permeabilized with 0.3% Tween 20 in 0.02 M PBS, blocked in 5% normal goat serum, and incubated overnight at 4°C with 20 µg/ml rabbit IgG against human OPN (LF-123 and LF-124) [19]. Immunoreactive protein was then detected using a fluorescein-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Zymed, San Francisco, CA). Coverslips were placed over a layer of Prolong antifade mounting reagent (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

Progesterone receptor (PR) protein was localized in paraffin-embedded uterine tissue sections using a mouse monoclonal antibody against human PR (MA1–411; Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO) and a Super ABC Mouse/Rabbit IgG Kit (Biomeda, Foster City, CA) as previously described [20]. Sections (5–7 µm) were deparaffinized, rehydrated to water, subjected to heated citrate buffer antigen retrieval, and then incubated with anti-PR IgG (5 µg/ml) or mouse IgG (5 µg/ml; Sigma). Immunoreactive protein was visualized using diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma) as the chromogen. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and coverslipped over Permount (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA).

Photomicroscopy

Photomicrographs of representative fields of in situ hybridization slides were evaluated under brightfield and darkfield illumination with a Zeiss Axioplan2 microscope fitted with a Hamamatsu chilled 3CCD color camera (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Digital images were captured using Adobe Photoshop 4.0 (Adobe Systems, Seattle, WA) and MacIntosh PowerMac G3 computer (Apple Computer, Cupertino, CA). Prints were generated electronically using a Kodak DS8650 color printer. Photomicrographs of representative fields of immunofluorescence slides were photographed in brightfield with a Zeiss Photomicroscope III (Carl Zeiss) on T-Max 3200 film (Kodak).

Statistical Analyses

Data were subjected to least squares (LS)-ANOVA using the General Linear Models procedures of the Statistical Analysis System [21]. Slot-blot hybridization data (total counts) were analyzed using the 18S rRNA as a covariate in LS-ANOVA. Preplanned orthogonal contrasts (P-CX vs. P-IFN; P+ZK-CX vs. P-CX; P+ZK-IFN vs. P-IFN) were used to test for effects of treatment [22]. All tests of significance were performed using the appropriate error terms according to the expectation of the mean squares for error. Data are presented as least-square means with SE.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Endometrial OPN mRNA

The contributions of progesterone and/or IFN{tau} to endometrial OPN mRNA expression were examined in ovariectomized ewes subjected to the treatment regimen summarized in Figure 1A. Slot-blot hybridization analysis (Fig. 1B) revealed that progesterone increased steady-state levels of endometrial OPN mRNA while the PR antagonist ZK suppressed this response (P-CX vs. P+ZK-CX, P < 0.01; P-IFN vs. P+ZK-IFN, P < 0.01). In contrast, i.u. administration of roIFN{tau} had no effect on OPN mRNA expression regardless of steroid treatments (P-CX vs. P-IFN, P > 0.10; P+ZK-CX vs. P+ZK-IFN, P > 0.10).

In Situ Hybridization Analysis of OPN mRNA

In uteri of P-CX and P-IFN ewes, OPN mRNA was localized only in the endometrial GE of the stratum spongiosum (Fig. 2). In contrast, OPN mRNA was not detected in GE of P+ZK-treated ewes regardless of i.u. protein treatment. In uteri from all ewes, OPN mRNA was observed in clusters of immune cells that were distributed in an intermittent pattern within the uterine stroma (Fig. 3). The majority of these OPN mRNA-positive cells were located in the stratum compactum; however, immune cells were observed in only a small percentage of the total stratum compactum. The number and distribution of these cells were not affected by steroid or i.u. protein treatment (data not shown).



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Detection of OPN mRNA within GE of ovine endometrium by in situ hybridization analysis. Corresponding brightfield and darkfield images of endometrium for each treatment are compared. Representative sections hybridized with radiolabeled sense cRNA probe (P-CXs) served as negative controls. OPN mRNA was present in the GE of ewes treated with progesterone alone, but absent in ewes treated with ZK (a PR antagonist). Note that the microscope fields selected exhibited minimal expression of the OPN-positive immune cells shown in Figure 3. L, Luminal epithelium; cG, glands of the stratum compactum (superficial or shallow); sG, glands of the stratum spongiosum (deep); S, stroma. x45



View larger version (114K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Detection of OPN mRNA within distributed clusters of immune cells in the ovine endometrium by in situ hybridization analysis. Corresponding brightfield and darkfield images of endometrium represent all treatment groups because the immune cell hybridization pattern did not differ between treatments. Representative sections hybridized with radiolabeled sense cRNA probe (P-CXs) served as negative controls. OPN mRNA was present in scattered immune cells within the stratum compactum of ewes regardless of treatment. Note that shallow glands of the stratum spongiosum expressed OPN mRNA. L, Luminal epithelium; cG, glands of the stratum compactum (superficial or shallow); sG, glands of the stratum spongiosum (deep); S, stroma. x45

Immunofluorescent Localization of OPN Protein

Immunoreactive OPN was detected at the apical surface of both LE and GE of all ewes examined regardless of in vivo treatment (Fig. 4). OPN was not present in the endometrial stroma, myometrium, or blood vessels. Controls in which rabbit IgG replaced anti-hOPN primary antibody showed no cross-reacting protein at the apical surface of the endometrial epithelium.



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Detection of OPN in ovine endometrium using immunofluorescence staining of frozen uterine sections with the cocktail of polyclonal rabbit anti-hOPN IgG (LF-123 + LF-124). Sections represent all treatment groups because the staining pattern did not differ between treatments. OPN was expressed on the apical surface of LE (A, B) and in GE (D, E). Note low-level autofluorescence in endometrial blood vessels (D, top left of panel). Compare the absence of antibody staining in LE (C) and GE (F) when rabbit IgG was used to detect immunoreactive proteins. A, C, D, and F = x80; B and E = x210

Western Blot Analysis of OPN Protein in Endometrial Extracts and Explant Culture Medium

Immunoreactive 70-, 45-, and 25-kDa OPN proteins were detected in endometrial extracts from all ewes examined (Fig. 5A), but there were no effects of steroid or protein treatment on the pattern or intensity of immunoreactive proteins. As shown in Figure 5B, the 45- and 25-kDa OPN forms were detected predominantly in endometrial explant culture medium. Levels of the 45-kDa OPN were dramatically reduced in culture medium from ewes receiving ZK (Fig. 5B).



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Detection of OPN (10% 1D-PAGE) in ovine endometrial extracts (A; 100 µg/lane) or endometrial explants after culture for 24 h (B; 60 µg/lane). Each lane represents samples from a different ewe. Immunoreactive proteins were detected using a cocktail of polyclonal rabbit anti-hOPN IgG (LF-123 + LF-124) or rabbit IgG. Positions of prestained molecular weight standards are indicated. The 45-kDa form of OPN decreased in endometrial explant culture medium from ewes that were treated with ZK (a PR antagonist). A bubble in the 1D-PAGE gel interfered with detection of the 25-kDa OPN in the P+ZK-IFN treatment group (A)

Immunocytochemical Localization of PR Protein

Nuclear PR was not evident in either endometrial LE or GE of ewes that received P alone (P-CX or P-IFN), whereas nuclear PR was present in endometrial LE and GE of ewes that received ZK (Fig. 6). PR were present in endometrial ST of all ewes examined regardless of in vivo treatment (Fig. 6).



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Detection of PR protein in ovine endometrium using immunocytochemical staining of paraffin-embedded uterine sections with a mouse monoclonal antibody against human PR (data also reported previously [49]). A representative section stained with nonimmune mouse IgG (IgG) served as a negative control. PR protein appeared in the stroma of ewes from all treatment groups; however, PR expression was down-regulated in epithelia of ewes treated with progesterone alone (P-CX or P-IFN). Epithelial PR were present only in ewes in which PR was inactivated due to treatment with ZK (a PR antagonist). L, Luminal epithelium; cG, glands of the stratum compactum (superficial or shallow); sG, glands of the stratum spongiosum (deep); S, stroma. x80


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present studies confirm earlier reports [6, 14] that revealed complex expression of OPN within the ovine uterus. OPN mRNA was localized within endometrial GE of ovariectomized ewes receiving progesterone only (Fig. 2). The GE-specific expression of ovine OPN mRNA is similar to that reported for leukemia inhibiting factor [23] and calcitonin [24] in the rodent uterus. These proteins are secreted into the uterine lumen and are required for blastocyst implantation. Administration of ZK 137,316 (a PR antagonist) completely ablated progesterone-induced OPN expression in GE. Thus, an interaction between progesterone and PR is required for induction of OPN mRNA in ovine GE. It should be emphasized that progesterone induced OPN mRNA in GE cells that lacked PR. These results agree with studies of PR gene expression in cyclic and pregnant ovine endometrium and suggest that epithelial PR down-regulation is required for up-regulation of endometrial gland secretory function [25]. Endometrial PR are expressed in LE and GE on Days 9 and 11 of pregnancy, but are progressively lost between Days 13 and 19 of pregnancy in all but the deepest endometrial GE. Indeed, down-regulation of PR gene expression in GE may be integral to progesterone induction of GE secretory genes, because administration of estrogen with progesterone to ovariectomized ewes up-regulated PR expression in endometrial GE and dramatically decreased uterine milk protein and OPN expression by GE [26]. In the present study, administration of ZK to progesterone-treated ovariectomized ewes allowed PR expression to increase in endometrial GE, and this ablated OPN mRNA expression by GE. Although administration of progesterone for 25 days down-regulated PR in all endometrial epithelia, PR expression remained abundant in stromal cells. These results indicate that progesterone regulates OPN expression in GE through a complex mechanism that requires down-regulation of PR, and we suggest the possible involvement of a paracrine factor(s) produced by stromal cells, a progestamedin.

Uterine stromal cell mediation of epithelial cell function has been demonstrated. Bigsby and Cunha (1986) [27] proposed that estrogen receptors in uterine stromal cells are required for estrogen to induce uterine epithelial cell proliferation in neonatal mice. Using PR knockout mice [28], the same laboratory demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of progesterone on estrogen-induced murine uterine epithelial proliferation is mediated via stromal PR and not epithelial PR [29]. Keratinocyte growth factor/fibroblast growth factor-7 (KGF/FGF-7) is a candidate stromal-to-epithelial cell mediator of proliferation, because KGF injections stimulate proliferation of uterine epithelium [30] and KGF is considered a stromal cell-derived progestamedin in the primate endometrium [31]. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), another proposed mediator of stromal-to-epithelial cell signaling [32], may modulate regeneration of the human endometrium after menstruation [33]. There is recent evidence that HGF, FGF-7, and FGF-10, as well as their respective receptors, c-met and KGF receptor (KGFR), are present in the ovine uterus [34]. HGF and FGF-10 mRNA are expressed predominately by stromal cells of the stratum compactum of the ovine uterine endometrium, whereas c-met and KGFR mRNA are detected only in LE and GE [34].

OPN mRNA was also detected in randomly distributed groups of cells within the stroma, regardless of steroid or protein treatment; the majority of these scattered cells were in the stratum compactum (Fig. 3). The apparent cell morphology and intermittent spacing of these cells within the endometrium, combined with evidence for OPN expression by T-lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and natural killer cells, provide indirect evidence that these are immune cells [3537]. Expression and secretion of OPN by these cells may explain accumulation of OPN on the uterine LE of all ewes regardless of treatment (Fig. 4), as well as the constitutive presence of OPN protein in endometrial extracts (Fig. 5A). A wide array of epithelia express OPN [4]. Perhaps OPN has a long life span on the cell surface and is maintained on the LE of cyclic ewes to maximize uterine receptivity to potential conceptus attachment.

Expression of OPN within the ovine uterine environment may be further regulated by posttranslational modification of the secreted protein. OPN is a 70-kDa protein that gives rise to 45- and 25-kDa fragments upon freezing and thawing or by treatment with proteases [38]. During the ovine estrous cycle and early pregnancy, three forms of OPN are detected in endometrial cytosolic extracts [6]. In this study, endometrial extracts also possessed 70-, 45-, and 25-kDa immunoreactive forms of OPN that did not vary with treatment (Fig. 5A). However, Western blots of endometrial explant culture medium detected predominantly the 45- and 25-kDa OPN forms (Fig. 5B). These results agree with those from analyses of uterine flushings from cyclic and pregnant ewes [6] and suggest differential cleavage of secreted OPN. Of particular interest is the dramatic decrease in the 45-kDa OPN form in explant cultures derived from ewes that received ZK (Fig. 5B). This 45-kDa form of OPN binds with higher affinity to {alpha}vß3 integrins and has greater biological activity than the native 70-kDa form [39]. However, it is susceptible to degradation into smaller 20- to 30-kDa fragments [40]. Progesterone may regulate production of factors, such as tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases [41], that prevent degradation of the 45-kDa OPN, and thereby maintain the presence of this biologically active OPN in the uterine lumen of pregnant ewes. Increased levels of the 45-kDa OPN may be significant regarding interactions of OPN within the periimplantation conceptus and uterine epithelia.

Implantation is a progressive process involving adhesion molecule-dependent remodeling of endometrium and trophectoderm [42]. The GRGDS sequence of OPN suggests interactions with cell surface integrins [43]. Integrins are the dominant molecules in adhesion cascades since they can bind their extracellular matrix ligand(s) to mediate adhesion (implantation), cytoskeletal reorganization to stabilize adhesion (elongation of conceptuses), and transduction of cellular signals through numerous signaling intermediates [44]. Indeed, human smooth muscle cells adhere and migrate to OPN in culture [11]. OPN binding to {alpha}vß3 integrins results in rapid phosphoinositide turnover and inositol trisphosphate production [12], alterations in cytosolic calcium [45], and increased angiogenesis [46]. Expression of OPN in the reproductive tracts of several species has been established. OPN is expressed by murine metrial gland cells of the decidua, trophoblast, and placenta [47]. Likewise, OPN is expressed at high levels by invading cytotrophoblast of the chorionic villus, endometrial GE of secretory-phase uteri, and decidualizing stromal cells of baboons and humans [3, 4, 48]. In ruminants, OPN is present in the bovine oviductal epithelium and luminal fluid [7], whereas OPN protein has been detected on ovine endometrial LE and in uterine flushings [6].

Collectively, results from human and rodent models indicate that OPN secreted by uterine epithelia binds integrins on luminal surfaces, and that this interaction is important for LE communication with the external environment [4]. In ewes, secretion of OPN by uterine GE [6, 14], along with the presence of {alpha}v, {alpha}4, {alpha}9, ß1, ß3, and ß9 integrin ligand on trophectoderm and uterine LE (unpublished results), indicates a possible role for OPN in apposition, attachment, and adhesion of the trophoblast to the uterine LE. Results of the present studies indicate that OPN mRNA expression in the ovine uterus is induced by progesterone and leads to secretion of OPN into the uterine lumen by GE. We hypothesize that OPN then binds integrins expressed by trophectoderm and uterine epithelia to 1) stimulate changes in morphology of trophectoderm and extraembryonic endoderm that result in elongation of the conceptus and 2) induce adhesion between LE and trophectoderm essential for attachment and superficial implantation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Marian F. Young of the National Institutes of Health for rabbit polyclonal antibodies to recombinant human OPN; Dr. Kristoff Chwalisz, Schering AG, Berlin, Germany, for the ZK 137.316; and Dr. Shawn Ramsey and Mr. Todd Taylor of the Texas A&M University Sheep and Goat Center for care and management of ewes. Use of microscopy and imaging facilities in the College of Veterinary Medicine Image Analysis Laboratory, which is supported, in part, by NIH Grant P30 ES09106, is acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 18 November 1999.

1 Research supported by USDA-NRICGP 95–37203-2185 to F.W.B. and R.C.B., and by NIH 1-F32-HD08501-01A1 to G.A.J. Back

2 Correspondence: Fuller W. Bazer, Department of Animal Science and Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, 442D Kleberg Center, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471. FAX: 409 862 2662; fbazer{at}cvm.tamu.edu Back

Accepted: December 17, 1999.

Received: October 20, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Butler WT, Ridall AL, McKee MD. Osteopontin. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds.), Principals of Bone Biology. New York: Academic Press, Inc.; 1996: 167–181.
  2. Franzen A, Heinegard D. Isolation and characterization of two sialoproteins present only in bovine calcified matrix. Biochem J 1985; 232:715–724.[Medline]
  3. Young MF, Kerr JM, Termine JP, Weever UM, Wang MG, McBride OW, Fisher LW. cDNA cloning, mRNA distribution and heterogeneity, chromosomal location, and RFLP analysis of human osteopontin (OPN). Genomics 1990; 7:491–502.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Brown LF, Berse B, Van DeWater L, Papadopoulos-Sergiose A, Peruzzi CA, Manseau EJ, Dvorak H, Senger DR. Expression and distribution of osteopontin in human tissues: widespread association with lumenal epithelial surfaces. Mol Biol Cell 1992; 3:1169–1180.[Abstract]
  5. McKee MD, Nanci A, Khan SR. Ultrastructural immunodetection of osteopontin and osteocalcin as major matrix components of renal calculi. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10:1913–1929.[Medline]
  6. Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Spencer TE, Newton GR, Ott TL, Bazer FW. Ovine osteopontin: II. Osteopontin and {alpha}vß3 integrin expression in the uterus and conceptus during the periimplantation period. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:892–899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gabler C, Chapman DA, Gerena RL, Sorenson ES, Killian GJ. Osteopontin is present in the bovine oviduct epithelium and luminal fluid. Biol Reprod 1999; 60(suppl 1):151 (abstract 186).
  8. Bautista DS, Xuan J-W, Hota C, Chambers AF, Harris JF. A monoclonal antibody against osteopontin inhibits RGD-mediated cell adhesion to osteopontin. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1995; 760:127–142.[Medline]
  9. Hu DD, Lin ECK, Kovach NL, Hoyer JR, Smith JW. A biochemical characterization of the binding of osteopontin to integrins {alpha}vß1 and {alpha}vß5. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:26232–26238.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bayless KJ, Meininger GA, Scholtz JM, Davis GE. Osteopontin is a ligand for the {alpha}4ß1 integrin. J Cell Sci 1998; 111:1165–1174.[Abstract]
  11. Liaw L, Skinner MP, Raines EW, Ross R, Cheresh DA, Schwartz SM. The adhesive and migratory effects of osteopontin are mediated via distinct cell surface integrins. J Clin Invest 1995; 95:713–724.
  12. Hruska KA, Rolnick F, Huskey M, Alvarez U, Cheresh D. Engagement of the osteoclast integrin {alpha}vß3 by osteopontin stimulates phosphatidylinositol 3-hydroxy kinase activity. Endocrinology 1995; 136:2984–2992.[Abstract]
  13. Bazer FW, Roberts RM. Biochemical aspects of conceptus-endometrial interactions. J Exp Zool 1983; 228:373–384.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Ovine osteopontin: I. Cloning and expression of mRNA in the uterus during the periimplantation period. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:884–891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Spencer TE, Ing NA, Ott TL, Mayes JS, Becker WC, Watson GH, Mirando MA, Bazer FW. Intrauterine injection of ovine interferon-tau (oIFN-{tau}) alters oestrogen receptor and oxytocin receptor expression in the endometrium of cyclic ewes. J Mol Endocrinol 1995; 15:203–220.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Spencer TE, Stagg AG, Ott TL, Johnson GA, Ramsey SW, Bazer FW. Differential effects of intrauterine and subcutaneous administration of recombinant ovine interferon tau on the endometrium of cyclic ewes. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:464–470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ausebel FM, Brent R, Kinston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith HA, Struhl KA. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1992.
  18. Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin M, McKenna N, Allis CD, Zhou J, Onate S, Tsai SY, Tsai J, O'Malley BW. Steroid receptor coactivator one (SRC-1) is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 1997; 389;194–196.
  19. Fisher LW, Stubbs III JT, Young MF. Antisera and cDNA probes to human and certain animal model bone matrix noncollagenous proteins. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66:61–65.
  20. Spencer TE, Bartol FF, Bazer FW, Johnson GA, Joyce MM. Identification and characterization of glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1-like protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:241–250.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. SAS. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6. Carey, NC: Statistical Analyses System Institute, Inc.; 1990.
  22. Steele RGD, Torrie JH. Principals and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
  23. Stewart CL, Kaspar P, Burnet LJ, Bhatt H, Gadi I, Kentgen F, Albondanzo SJ. Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukemia inhibiting factor. Nature 1992; 359:76–79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Zhu L-J, Cullinan-Bove K, Polihronis M, Bagchi MK, Bagchi IC. Calcitonin is a progesterone-regulated marker that forecasts the receptive state of endometrium during implantation. Endocrinology 1998; 139:3923–3934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Temporal and spatial alterations in uterine estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor gene expression during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in the ewe. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:1527–1543.[Abstract]
  26. Spencer TE, Gray CA, Johnson GA, Taylor KM, Gertler A, Gootwine E, Ott TL, Bazer FW. Effects of recombinant ovine interferon tau, placental lactogen, and growth hormone on the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1409–1418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Bigsby RM, Cunha GR. Estrogen stimulation of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in uterine epithelial cells which lack estrogen receptors. Endocrinology 1986; 119:390–396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Funk CR, Mani SK, Hughes AR, Montgomery CA Jr, Shyamala G, Conneely OM, O'Malley BW. Mice lacking progesterone receptor exhibit pleiotropic reproductive abnormalities. Genes Dev 1995; 9:2266–2278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kurita T, Young P, Body JR, Lydon JP, O'Malley BW, Cunha GR. Stromal progesterone receptors mediate the inhibitory effects of progesterone on estrogen-induced uterine epithelial cell deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis. Endocrinology 1998; 139:4708–4713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Hom YK, Young P, Thomson AA, Cunha GR. Keratinocyte growth factor injected into female mouse neonates stimulates uterine and vaginal epithelial growth. Endocrinology 1998; 139:3772–3779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Koji T, Chedid M, Rubin JS, Slayden OD, Csaky KG, Aaronson SA, Brenner RM. Progesterone-dependent expression of keratinocyte growth factor mRNA in stromal cells of the primate endometrium: keratinocyte growth factor as a progestomedin. J Cell Biol 1994; 125:393–401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Matsumoto K, Nalamura T. Roles of HGF as a pleiotropic factor in organ regeneration. In: Goldberg ID, Rosen EM (eds.), Hepatocyte Growth Factor-Scatter Factor (HGF-SF) and c-met receptor. Basel: Birkhauser Verlog; 1993: 225–249.
  33. Sugawara J, Tukaya T, Murakami T, Yoshida H, Yajima A. Hepatocyte growth factor stimulates proliferation, migration, and lumen formation of human endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:936–942.[Abstract]
  34. Chen C, Spencer TE, Bazer FW. Identification of stromal mediators of epithelial function in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 1999; 60(suppl 1):204 (abstract 358).
  35. Patarca R, Freeman GJ, Singh RP. Structural and functional studies of the early T-lymphocyte activation 1 (Eta-1) gene. Definition of a novel T cell-dependent response associated with genetic resistance to bacterial infection. J Exp Med 1989; 170:145–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Murray GE, Giachelli CM, Schwartz SM, Vrancko R. Macrophages express osteopontin during repair of myocardial necrosis. Am J Pathol 1994; 145:1450–1462.[Abstract]
  37. Pollack SB, Linnemeyer PA, Gill S. Induction of osteopontin mRNA expression during activation of murine NK cells. J Leukocyte Biol 1994; 55:398–400.[Abstract]
  38. Fresno M, Mvay-Boudreau L, Nabel G, Cantor H. Antigen-specific T-lymphocyte clones. II. Purification and biological characterization of an antigen-specific suppressive protein synthesized by cloned T-cells. J Exp Med 1981; 153:1260–1274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Senger DR, Ledbetter SR, Claffey KP, Papadopoulos-Seriou A, Perruzzi CA, Detmer M. Stimulation of endothelial cell migration by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor through mechanisms involving the alpha v beta 3 integrin, osteopontin, and thrombin. Am J Pathol 1996; 149:293–305.[Abstract]
  40. Bayless KJ, Davis GE, Meininger GA. Isolation and biological properties of osteopontin from bovine milk. Protein Expr Purif 1997; 9:309–314.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Hampton AL, Butt AR, Riley SC, Salmonsen LA. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in endometrium of ovariectomized steroid-treated ewes during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:302–311.
  42. Aplin JD. Adhesion molecules in implantation. Rev Reprod 1997; 2:84–93.[Abstract]
  43. Rouslahti E, Pierschbacher MD. New perspectives in cell adhesion: RGD and integrins. Science 1987; 238:491–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Burghardt RC, Bowen JA, Newton GR, Bazer FW. Extracellular matrix and the implantation cascade in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1997; 52:151–164.[Medline]
  45. Zimolo Z, Wesolowski G, Tanake H, Hyman J, Hayer JR, Rodan GA. Soluble {alpha}vß3 integrin ligands increase intracellular [Ca++] in rat osteoclasts and mouse derived osteoclast-like cells. Am J Physiol 1994; 266:C367–381.
  46. Liaw L, Almeida M, Hart CE, Schwartz SM, Giachelli CM. Osteopontin promotes vascular cell adhesion and spreading and is chemotactic for smooth muscle cells in vitro. Circ Res 1994; 74:214–224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Nomura S, Wills AJ, Edwards JK, Heath JK, Hogan BLM. Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization. J Cell Biol 1988; 106:441–450.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Fazleabas AT, Bell SC, Fleming S, Sun J, Lessey BA. Distribution of integrin and the extracellular matrix proteins in the baboon endometrium during the menstrual cycle and early pregnancy. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:348–356.[Abstract]
  49. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Joyce MM, Bazer FW. Interferon-tau and progesterone regulate ubiquitin cross-reactive protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:622–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. Banerjee, R. Rose, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, and S. K. Ramaiah
The Influence of Estrogen on Hepatobiliary Osteopontin (SPP1) Expression in a Female Rodent Model of Alcoholic Steatohepatitis
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2009; 37(4): 492 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
G. Song, M C. Satterfield, J. Kim, F. W Bazer, and T. E Spencer
Progesterone and interferon tau regulate leukemia inhibitory factor receptor and IL6ST in the ovine uterus during early pregnancy
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 553 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. C Burghardt, J. R Burghardt, J. D Taylor II, A. T Reeder, B. T Nguen, T. E Spencer, K. J Bayless, and G. A Johnson
Enhanced focal adhesion assembly reflects increased mechanosensation and mechanotransduction at maternal-conceptus interface and uterine wall during ovine pregnancy
Reproduction, March 1, 2009; 137(3): 567 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, K. A. Dunlap, J. Kim, D. W. Bailey, T. E. Spencer, R. C. Burghardt, G. F. Wagner, G. A. Johnson, and F. W. Bazer
Stanniocalcin 1 Is a Luminal Epithelial Marker for Implantation in Pigs Regulated by Progesterone and Estradiol
Endocrinology, February 1, 2009; 150(2): 936 - 945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. A. Dunlap, D. W. Erikson, R. C. Burghardt, F. J. White, K. M. Reed, J. L. Farmer, T. E. Spencer, R. R. Magness, F. W. Bazer, K. J. Bayless, et al.
Progesterone and Placentation Increase Secreted Phosphoprotein One (SPP1 or Osteopontin) in Uterine Glands and Stroma for Histotrophic and Hematotrophic Support of Ovine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2008; 79(5): 983 - 990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S.-C. Su, E. A. Mendoza, H.-i. Kwak, and K. J. Bayless
Molecular profile of endothelial invasion of three-dimensional collagen matrices: insights into angiogenic sprout induction in wound healing
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): C1215 - C1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. M. Joyce, J. R. Burghardt, R. C. Burghardt, R. N. Hooper, F. W. Bazer, and G. A. Johnson
Uterine MHC Class I Molecules and {beta}2-Microglobulin Are Regulated by Progesterone and Conceptus Interferons during Pig Pregnancy
J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2494 - 2505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Song, M. C. Satterfield, J. Kim, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (GRP) in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Interferon Tau and Progesterone
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 376 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, J. Kim, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Progesterone and Interferon Tau Regulate Hypoxia-Inducible Factors in the Endometrium of the Ovine Uterus
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1926 - 1934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. E Spencer, O. Sandra, and E. Wolf
Genes involved in conceptus-endometrial interactions in ruminants: insights from reductionism and thoughts on holistic approaches
Reproduction, February 1, 2008; 135(2): 165 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
R. G Lea and O. Sandra
Immunoendocrine aspects of endometrial function and implantation
Reproduction, September 1, 2007; 134(3): 389 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ka, S. Al-Ramadan, D. W. Erikson, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, T. E. Spencer, L. A. Jaeger, and F. W. Bazer
Regulation of Expression of Fibroblast Growth Factor 7 in the Pig Uterus by Progesterone and Estradiol
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2007; 77(1): 172 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. C. Satterfield, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Progesterone Regulation of Preimplantation Conceptus Growth and Galectin 15 (LGALS15) in the Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Progesterone and Interferon-{tau} Regulate Cystatin C in the Endometrium
Endocrinology, July 1, 2006; 147(7): 3478 - 3483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. Song, F. W. Bazer, G. F. Wagner, and T. E. Spencer
Stanniocalcin (STC) in the Endometrial Glands of the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Progesterone and Placental Hormones
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2006; 74(5): 913 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
F. J. White, J. W. Ross, M. M. Joyce, R. D. Geisert, R. C. Burghardt, and G. A. Johnson
Steroid Regulation of Cell Specific Secreted Phosphoprotein 1 (Osteopontin) Expression in the Pregnant Porcine Uterus
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2005; 73(6): 1294 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Cathepsins in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Pregnancy, Progesterone, and Interferon Tau
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4825 - 4833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Mirkin, M. Arslan, D. Churikov, A. Corica, J.I. Diaz, S. Williams, S. Bocca, and S. Oehninger
In search of candidate genes critically expressed in the human endometrium during the window of implantation
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2104 - 2117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
T. E Spencer, G. A Johnson, F. W Bazer, and R. C Burghardt
Implantation mechanisms: insights from the sheep
Reproduction, December 1, 2004; 128(6): 657 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. E. Spencer, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, and F. W. Bazer
Progesterone and Placental Hormone Actions on the Uterus: Insights from Domestic Animals
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 2 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. A. Gray, D. L. Adelson, F. W. Bazer, R. C. Burghardt, E. N. T. Meeusen, and T. E. Spencer
Discovery and characterization of an epithelial-specific galectin in the endometrium that forms crystals in the trophectoderm
PNAS, May 25, 2004; 101(21): 7982 - 7987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Osteopontin: Roles in Implantation and Placentation
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1458 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, M. M. Joyce, T. E. Spencer, F. W. Bazer, C. A. Gray, and C. Pfarrer
Osteopontin Is Synthesized by Uterine Glands and a 45-kDa Cleavage Fragment Is Localized at the Uterine-Placental Interface Throughout Ovine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2003; 69(1): 92 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, M. M. Joyce, T. E. Spencer, F. W. Bazer, C. Pfarrer, and C. A. Gray
Osteopontin Expression in Uterine Stroma Indicates a Decidualization-Like Differentiation During Ovine Pregnancy
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 1951 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K.B.C. Apparao, M. J. Illera, S. A. Beyler, G. E. Olson, K. G. Osteen, M. H. Corjay, K. Boggess, and B. A. Lessey
Regulated Expression of Osteopontin in the Peri-Implantation Rabbit Uterus
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1484 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
J. M. Borthwick, D. S. Charnock-Jones, B. D. Tom, M. L. Hull, R. Teirney, S. C. Phillips, and S. K. Smith
Determination of the transcript profile of human endometrium
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 19 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. E. Garlow, H. Ka, G. A. Johnson, R. C. Burghardt, L. A. Jaeger, and F. W. Bazer
Analysis of Osteopontin at the Maternal-Placental Interface in Pigs
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 718 - 725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. B. C. Apparao, M. J. Murray, M. A. Fritz, W. R. Meyer, A. F. Chambers, P. R. Truong, and B. A. Lessey
Osteopontin and Its Receptor {alpha}v{beta}3 Integrin Are Coexpressed in the Human Endometrium during the Menstrual Cycle But Regulated Differentially
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4991 - 5000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
G. A. Johnson, F. W. Bazer, L. A. Jaeger, H. Ka, J. E. Garlow, C. Pfarrer, T. E. Spencer, and R. C. Burghardt
Muc-1, Integrin, and Osteopontin Expression During the Implantation Cascade in Sheep
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 820 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
E. Asselin, G. A. Johnson, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 and -2 Messenger Ribonucleic Acids in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Pregnancy, Progesterone, and Interferon-{{tau}}
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 992 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bazer, F. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS