Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.
Biology of Reproduction 62, 1858-1865 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Regulation of Transforming Growth Factor-ß-Receptor Type I and Type II Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in the Hamster Ovary by Gonadotropinsand Steroid Hormones1

Shyamal K. Roy2,a

a Leland J. and Dorothy H. Olson Center for Women's Health, Departments of Ob/Gyn and Physiology and Biophysics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4515

ABSTRACT

The hormonal regulation of ovarian transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) type I receptor (TßRI) and TßRII messenger (mRNA) expression was evaluated using cyclic and hypophysectomized hamsters. Northern blot analysis revealed that three TßRI and one TßRII gene transcripts were expressed in the hamster ovary. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction quantitation revealed that receptor mRNA was differentially expressed during the estrous cycle. Although, mRNA levels for both receptor types increased steadily up to Day 4:0900 h, a sharp decline occurred following the gonadotropin surge. In fact, receptor mRNA started declining by Day 4:1200 h, long before the gonadotropin surge; however, only TßRI mRNA levels recovered partially by 1500 h to fall again by 1600 h. Although hypophysectomy preferentially reduced TßRII mRNA levels, gonadotropins as well as ovarian steroids significantly induced TßRI and TßRII mRNA expression within 48 h and 24 h, respectively; 5{alpha}-dihydrotesterone (DHT) induced only TßRII mRNA. The induction of ovarian TßRI and TßRII mRNA by estradiol-17ß or progesterone was severely attenuated by dexamethasone. A marked increase in serum cortisol coincided with the periovulatory rise in serum gonadotropins. These results suggest that the increase in TGF-ß receptor mRNA expression correlates with gonadotropin-induced ovarian follicular development during the estrous cycle. Moreover, receptor mRNA expression is critically and differentially regulated by gonadotropins as well as ovarian steroids. Most importantly, glucocorticoid appears to play a critical modulatory role in the temporal expression of receptor mRNA in the ovary, hence, controlling folliculogenesis.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, we have shown that transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) receptor type II (TßRII) protein is expressed in hamster follicular as well as in interstitial cells, and FSH, estrogen, and 5{alpha}-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a nonaromatizable androgen, up-regulate receptor protein expression [1]. The expression of TGF-ß receptor protein and mRNA have also been detected in cultured porcine granulosa cells [2]. Numerous studies have documented that ovarian cells of a variety of species express TGF-ß gene transcripts and their ligands [310], and exogenous TGF-ß significantly influences the functions of both granulosa and thecal cells [1012]. All these lines of evidence clearly establish the presence of a TGF-ß system in the mammalian ovary and a significant role of TGF-ß in ovarian follicular development.

Transforming growth factor-ß belongs to a multigene family and, depending on the cell types, influences cell growth, differentiation, motility, organization, and death [13, 14]. The physiological action of TGF-ß is mediated by a ligand-induced cell surface receptor complex consisting of TGF-ß receptor type I and type II [14, 15]. Both type I and II receptor proteins contain an amino-terminal signal sequence, a cysteine-rich extracellular ligand binding domain with N-linked glycosylation sites, a single hydrophobic transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic kinase domain [13]. The expression of TßRII mRNA in the rat ovary [16], and TßR-I and -II mRNA in cultured porcine granulosa cells [2] has been documented. Hamster follicular development is significantly affected by TGF-ß [16, 17] and TßRII protein expression in the hamster ovary is critically influenced by gonadotropins and sex steroids [8]. However, it is unclear whether gonadotropins and steroid hormones also modulate ovarian TGF-ß receptor mRNA levels. Species-specific receptor cDNAs are critical for the quantitation of mRNA levels; however, no information is available for the nucleic acid sequence of hamster TGF-ß receptor cDNA. Therefore, cDNAs corresponding to the kinase domain of hamster TGF-ß receptor type I and type II receptors have been generated and used in the present study. The objective of the present study was to study the role of hormonal interaction on ovarian TßR mRNA expression during the estrous cycle. The study was done using the whole ovary rather than any single compartment because the first goal was to identify whether hormones influence the overall expression of ovarian receptor mRNA, which reflects the cumulated interaction of different cell types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Golden hamsters (90–100 g) were purchased from SASCO (Madison, WI) and maintained in a 14L:10D cycle in a climate-controlled facility according to IACUC and USDA guidelines. All oligodeoxynucleotide primers were synthesized by Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc. (The Woodlands, TX). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) chemicals were obtained from Life Technologies (Rockville, MD), Boehringer/Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Mannheim, Germany) or Amersham/Pharmacia (Piscataway, NJ), and Zeta Probe nucleic acid transfer membrane was from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). TriReagent for RNA extraction was from MRC, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH), plasmid vector pGemT-easy and riboprobe kit were from Promega (Madison, WI), [32P]{alpha}-CTP (specific activity 1000 Ci/mmol) and [32P]-{gamma}-ATP (specific activity 7000 Ci/mmol) were from ICN Radiochemicals (Costa Mesa, CA). Cortisol assay kit was from Diagnostic Products Corporation (Los Angeles, CA). All other molecular grade chemicals were obtained from Life Technologies. Gonadotropins were generously provided by the National Hormone Program (NIH) and Dr. A.F. Parlow (Stanford, CA); progesterone antibody was generously provided by Dr. D.C. Johnson (University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS); and estradiol-17ß (E2) antibody was a gift from Dr. M. Kumar (Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS).

Experiment 1: Development of Hamster TßRI and TßRII cDNA by RT-PCR

Hamster ovarian poly(A)+ RNA was used for generating cDNA corresponding to the kinase domain of TßRI and TßRII. The forward (5'-GGTCTTGCCCATCTTCACATG-3') and reverse (5'-GTCGAGCAATTTCCCAG-3') primers for TßRI receptor cDNA were selected from the homologous region of mouse TßRI [18] and human ALK-5 [19] cDNA. The forward (5'-AAGGCCAAGCTGAAGCAGAAC-3') and reverse (5'-AGCTCTTGAGGTCCCTGTG-3') primers for TßRII receptor cDNA were selected from the homologous region of mouse [20] and human [21] TßRII cDNA. The specificity of the PCR products was verified using restriction digestion and Southern blotting using 5'-[32P]-oligodeoxynucleotides specific for mouse TßRI and TßRII cDNA, respectively. Hamster TßRI and TßRII cDNA were cloned in PGEM-T-easy vector (Promega) and sequenced in an automated DNA sequencer (ABI, UNMC Genetic Sequence Core). The cDNA sequences of both TßRI and TßRII were compared with that of human, mouse and rat for similarity and with other cDNA sequences in the GeneBank to ensure specificity using GCG program (UNMC genetic analysis core). The TßRI and TßRII cDNAs were transcribed using [32P]{alpha}-CTP and a riboprobe kit (Promega), and the probes were used for Northern hybridization evaluation of hamster ovarian TßR mRNA. The forward and reverse primers were used subsequently for semiquantitative assessment of the levels of receptor mRNA in the ovary.

Next, hamster ovarian poly(A)+ RNA was extracted using TriReagent and oligo(dT)+ cellulose (Collaborative Research, Bedford, MA) according to the manufacturers' instructions and used for Northern analysis of TßRI and TßRII as described previously [22] with some modifications. Briefly, 10 µg of poly(A)+ RNA was fractionated in a denaturing formaldehyde agarose gel, transferred to a Zeta-probe membrane and hybridized overnight at 68°C in 40% formamide/6x standard saline citrate in the presence of either [32P]-sense or antisense cRNA, and the signal was determined after exposing the membrane to a NEN-DuPont Reflection film for 48 h.

Experiment 2: Analysis of Ovarian TßRI and TßRII mRNA During the Estrous Cycle

Animals were checked for at least three consecutive estrous cycles, and ovaries were collected at 0900 h on each day of the estrous cycle (Day 1 = estrous; Day 4 = proestrous) and at 1600 h on Day 4 to delineate TßR and S4 (hamster ribosomal protein) mRNA levels under endogenous hormonal milieu and after the periovulatory gonadotropin surge. S4 was selected for normalization and verification of the specificity of TGF-ß receptor mRNA expression.

Because ovarian steroid hormone profiles change dramatically during the periovulatory period on Day 4, in a separate experiment, ovaries from proestrus hamsters were collected hourly from 1200 h (before the LH surge) through 1700 h (after the LH surge) and the RNA was evaluated for TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels. The levels of estradiol-17ß (E2) and progesterone (P) were determined by hormone-specific RIA as described before [1, 23].

Experiment 3: Effect of Exogenous Gonadotropinsand Steroid Hormones on Ovarian TßRI and TßRIImRNA Expression

Animals were hypophysectomized (HX) at Day 1:0900 h under Nembutal (sodium pentobarbital) anesthesia as described before [1, 24]. Ten days after the surgery, hamsters were injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with either vehicle (0.5 mg BSA in saline), 10 µg ovine-FSH (NIH-FSH-19) twice daily for 2 days or 10 U hCG (NIH-CR-125) with or without FSH, and killed 48 h later. Human chorionic gonadotropin was used because of its longer half life than LH. A separate group of HX animals received a single s.c. injection of either 0.5 mg of E2, 1 mg of progesterone (P), 0.5 mg DHT, or 0.5 mg E2 followed 6 h later by 1 mg of progesterone. Steroid hormone-injected animals were killed 24 h after the first injection and ovaries were retrieved to determine the levels of receptor mRNA. Although the dosage of steroids appeared to be pharmacological, circulating levels of E2 and P were close to the levels found on the morning of Day 4 and Day 1, respectively. The goal was to evaluate any effect of steroid hormones on ovarian TßR mRNA levels. We used DHT to determine the direct effect of androgen on ovarian TßR mRNA levels and because DHT significantly influences TßRII protein expression in the hamster ovary [1]. Besides, we have used these dosages of steroid hormones to evaluate TßRII protein expression in the hamster ovary [1].

Serum levels of progesterone and E2 during the periovulatory period of cyclic hamsters, and of HX-hamster treated with or without steroid hormones were measured using steroid specific RIA as described previously [1, 23].

Experiment 4: Changes in the Receptor mRNA During the Periovulatory Period

In order to identify a window when critical changes in receptor mRNA levels occur during the periovulatory period, ovaries were collected from proestrous hamsters at 0900 h and at hourly intervals from 1200 h through 1700 h. The levels of receptor mRNA expression were evaluated.

Experiment 5: Interaction of Glucocorticoid and Ovarian Steroids Regulating Ovarian TßR mRNA Expression

To determine a possible mechanism of endogenous and exogenous gonadotropin regulation of ovarian receptor mRNA expression, 10-day HX hamsters were injected with a single s.c. injection of either 1 mg dexamethasone (DEX), 1 mg P, 0.5 mg E2, a combination of P and DEX, E2 and DEX, or P, E2, and DEX. Ovaries were retrieved 24 h later for receptor and S4 mRNA analysis. To correlate the effect of exogenous glucocorticoid with in vivo situation, serum levels of free cortisol were detected throughout the estrous cycle and during the periovulatory surge using a coat-a-count kit that used [125I]-cortisol as a tracer and required no solvent extraction of the serum. The assay had a sensitivity of 0.25 ng cortisol per tube and had the following cross-reactivity with other steroids: aldosterone 0.03%, corticosterone 0.94%, estrone 0.01%, pregnenolone 0.02%, progesterone 0.02% and tetrahydrocortisol 0.34%. All serum samples were assayed in a single run to avoid interassay variation. The intraassay variation was approximately 5%. Serum from long-term HX hamsters was included in the assay as an internal control.

RT-PCR Amplification of Hamster Ovarian TßR and S4 mRNA

Semiquantitative RT-PCR was done following a basic RT-PCR protocol described by Das et al. [25] that was modified for our study. Briefly, 0.5 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed for 40 min at 38°C in the presence of 1.5 µM of random hexamers (Amersham/Pharmacia, Arlington Heights, IL) and 100 U of MMLV-RT in a final volume of 7 µl. Because the data were expressed as a ratio of receptor and S4 mRNA to evaluate the specificity of receptor mRNA expression, a 1.5-µl aliquot of the RT product was used each for TßRI, TßRII and S4 cDNA amplification to avoid the variation in RNA amount. The PCR mixture contained 0.7 µM gene specific forward and reverse primers, dNTPs, BSA, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega). The amplification was continued for 30 cycles and a typical cycle consisted of 1 min at 94°C, 2 min at 56°C, and 2 min at 72°C. The PCR was optimized by verifying the linearity of cDNA synthesis for a total of 60 cycles. The synthesis of cDNA was linear from 20 through 60 cycles for receptor as well as S4 (Fig. 1); hence, a 30-cycle run was selected to stay within the linear range of amplification. The fidelity of the PCR was verified using controls 1) containing no RT reaction product, and 2) RT reaction product formed in the presence of RNase A–treated RNA. The purity of the RNA was verified using RT reaction product that was devoid of MMLV-reverse transcriptase. No PCR product was generated in any of the control tubes ensuring the purity of the RNA and cDNA products, and the fidelity of the RT-PCR.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Relationship between PCR cycle number and TßRII cDNA synthesis. The synthesis of cDNA was linear up to 60 cycles. A similar relationship was observed for TßRI and S4 (data not shown)

The forward (5'-GGCGATGAAGTCAAGAAG-3') and reverse (5'-CCCAAGTTAGCACCTCC-3') primers for hamster ribosomal protein, S4, were selected from the published cDNA sequence [26].

Southern Blotting and Semiquantitative Analysis of Ovarian TßR and S4 cDNA by Phosphorimaging

Southern hybridization was done according to Schatz et al. [27]. In brief, PCR product was fractionated in a 1% agarose-ethidium bromide gel under 1x TBS, pH 8.0 (Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, boric acid, and EDTA), visualized by UV-transillumination, denatured by alkaline hydrolysis, and neutralized, capillary transferred to a Zeta probe membrane, UV-cross linked, and hybridized overnight at 42°C with a [32P]-end labeled oligodeoxynucleotide probe corresponding to respective cDNA. The probes were labeled using a Maxiscript kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). The membrane hybridized with labeled S4 probe was exposed to the phosphor screen for 5 min while those hybridized with labeled receptor probe were exposed for 20 min. This was necessary because of the higher concentration of S4 mRNA in the total RNA preparation. The signal was quantified using a Packard cyclone phosphorimager. After background subtraction, total DLU (digital light units) for the receptor as well as S4 mRNA was reduced to DLU/min, and the results were expressed as the DLU ratio of the receptor mRNA versus S4 mRNA. This conversion was possible because of the higher signal absorption capacity of the phosphor screen.

Data Analysis

Ovarian RNA from four different hamsters was analyzed to get a total number of observation (n) = 4. Values for each group were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fischer's exact test using Statview statistical software (Abacus Concepts, Inc.). The level of significance was at 5%.

RESULTS

Amplification of Hamster TßRI and TßRII cDNA

The primer sets for TßRI (lanes 1–3) and TßRII (lanes 5–7) generated a predicted 306-bp and a 372-bp cDNA, respectively, while those for S4 (lanes 9–11) generated a predicted 398-bp cDNA (Fig. 2). No cDNA was detected when reverse transcriptase was omitted from the RT reaction, verifying the purity of the RNA (Fig. 2, lanes 4 and 8). Likewise, no cDNA was detected without RNA or with RNase-treated RNA (data not shown). The difference in the levels of TßRI and TßRII mRNA in the hamster ovary was apparent. Hamster TßRII cDNA sequence was 88% similar to corresponding human [21] and rat [28] TßRII sequences, and hamster TßRI cDNA sequence was 92% similar to corresponding human [19] and mouse [18] TßRI cDNA sequences (data not shown). Northern analysis revealed the presence of one 4.37-kb TßRII (Fig. 3) and three (a major 7.8-kb and two minor, 4.37- and 2.28-kb) TßRI gene transcripts in the hamster ovary (Fig. 3). Semiquantitative RT-PCR evaluation revealed that TGF-ß receptor mRNA were differentially expressed in the hamster ovary. For each day of the estrous cycle, ovarian TßRII mRNA levels at 0900 h were at least threefold higher than that of TßRI mRNA (Fig. 4). The relative amount of TßRII mRNA increased steadily from Day 1:0900 h to reach a significantly (P < 0.05) high level at Day 4:0900 h. In contrast, a significant (P < 0.05) increase in TßRI mRNA levels occurred at Day 3:0900 h. Receptor mRNA levels declined significantly (P < 0.05) following the periovulatory gonadotropin surge (Fig. 4).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Ethidium bromide–stained PCR products. Total ovarian RNA (0.5 µg) was reversed transcribed in the presence of random hexamers and an equal volume of the same RT product was amplified using TßRI-, TßRII-, or S4-specific primers, respectively. Lanes 1–3, 5–7, and 9–11 represent three separate RT-PCR amplifications using three different ovarian RNA samples. Lanes 4 and 8 represent RT-PCR of TßRI and TßRII, respectively, in the absence of MMLV reverse transcriptase. The cDNAs with predicted size were visible only when MMLV-RT was used. Numbers on the Y axis represent the size of the product formed. Note the differential levels of TßRI and TßRII mRNA expression in the hamster ovary



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Northern blots of hamster ovarian poly(A)+ RNA for TßRI (A) and TßRII (B) mRNA. There were one major and two minor transcripts for TßRI, and only one transcript for TßRII (arrowheads). No signal was obtained when [32P]-sense cRNA was used as a probe (data not shown)



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Relative levels of TßRI and TßRII mRNA in the hamster ovary during the estrous cycle and after the periovulatory gonadotropin surge. A differential expression of receptor mRNA was evident throughout the cycle. The levels of both receptor mRNA decreased sharply following the gonadotropin surge. Each bar represents CPM for the receptor mRNA normalized against S4 mRNA. *Value significantly different from TßRI mRNA levels at Day 3:0900 and Day 4:0900 h; **value significantly different from TßRII mRNA levels at Day 1:0900 through Day 4:0900 h; ***value significantly different from TßRII mRNA levels on any day

On proestrous, serum levels of E2 were high compared to P at 1200 h (Fig. 5). Progesterone levels did not change until 1400 h, coinciding with the LH surge [29], and increased steadily through 1700 h. Although serum E2 levels also peaked by 1600 h, the levels started declining by 1700 h resulting in a P-dominated environment (Fig. 5). Coinciding with changes in serum steroid hormone levels, TßRI mRNA levels increased gradually until 1500 h before declining further by 1600 h. In contrast, TßRII mRNA levels decreased steadily from 1200 h through 1600 h to reach a plateau by 1700 h (Fig. 6B). Hypophysectomy on Day 1:0900 h resulted 10 days later in a significant reduction in ovarian TßRII but not TßRI mRNA levels compared to that of cyclic Day 1:0900 h (Fig. 7). Follicle-stimulating hormone or hCG significantly increased the steady-state mRNA levels for both types of receptor (Fig. 7). Although, hCG-induced TßRII mRNA expression was significantly more than that of FSH, TßRII mRNA levels fell significantly when FSH was administered along with hCG (Fig. 7). While E2 increased TßRI mRNA expression, the effect was significantly reduced in the presence of P (Fig. 7). In contrast, a synergistic effect of E2 and P was noted for TßRII mRNA levels (Fig. 7). On the other hand, DHT significantly increased only TßRII mRNA levels (Fig. 7). Despite the known induction of preantral and antral follicle development in the hamster ovary by FSH [1], only hCG slightly increased serum P levels (Fig. 8). Follicle-stimulating hormone, however, was capable of slightly increasing serum E2 level regardless of the presence of hCG (Fig. 8). Exogenous steroid hormones maintained the serum levels within the nanogram range (Fig. 8) that correlated well with the pattern of serum levels of P at Day 1:0900 h and E2 at Day 4:0900 h. Administration of high dosages of steroids was necessary to maintain steady systemic levels of ovarian steroids. The DHT had no effect on serum levels of P and E2 (Fig. 8).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Temporal pattern of serum progesterone and estradiol-17ß levels in the cyclic hamster during the periovulatory period. Note a sharp increase in the progesterone levels by 1400 h and a reversal of the estradiol:progesterone ratio by 1700 h



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Changes in TßRI (A) and TßRII (B) mRNA levels in the hamster ovary during the periovulatory period. Whereas TßRI mRNA levels declined significantly by 1200 h relative to 0900 h, a rebound was evident by 1500 h. A further decline in the receptor mRNA occurred by 1600 h. Contrary to TßRI, TßRII mRNA levels started declining by 1200 h to reach a plateau by 1600 h. A) *Values significantly different from the 0900-h value; **values significantly different from the 1400- and 1500-h values. B) *Values significantly different from the 0900-h value; **value significantly different from the 0900- through 1500-h values; ***value significantly different from the 1600-h value



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. Relative expression of TßRI and TßRII mRNA in the hamster ovary following HX and after hormone replacement. Results indicate the ratio of receptor mRNA levels in treated versus HX hamsters. *Values for TßRI were significantly different from HX and cyclic hamsters; *values for TßRII were significantly (P < 0.05) different from the HX and Day 4:0900 h groups



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. Serum levels of steroid hormones in HX hamsters following gonadotropin and steroid hormone replacement. A low but noticeable rise in serum E2 was evident following FSH or FSH + hCG exposure, and an increase in P was apparent following hCG treatment

It was rather paradoxical that in cyclic hamsters, ovarian TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels decreased following the periovulatory gonadotropin surge but the levels of both mRNA increased significantly in HX hamsters treated with exogenous gonadotropins. To delineate the possible mechanism(s) of such a paradoxical effect we tested the effect of DEX on the expression of TßRI and TßRII mRNA in the hamster ovary. Consistent with our earlier results (Fig. 7), administration of P alone significantly (P < 0.05) elevated both TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels (Fig. 9), but a combined dose of DEX and P sharply reduced P-induced increase in ovarian TßRI mRNA levels by 6.5-fold and TßRII mRNA expression by 2-fold (Fig. 9). Alone, DEX stimulated (2-fold) basal TßRII mRNA expression but reduced basal TßRI mRNA by 2.6-fold (Fig. 9). Dexamethasone also inhibited E2- and E2-and P-induced TßRI mRNA expression by 10-fold (Fig. 9) and TßRII mRNA levels by 11-fold (Fig. 9). Serum levels of cortisol were modest on Day 1:0900 h and declined further by Day 4:0900 h; however, serum cortisol levels started increasing from Day 4:1200 h onward to reach a peak (P < 0.05) by Day 4:1600 h (Fig. 10), coinciding with the preovulatory gonadotropin surge. Serum cortisol levels declined by 1700 h, albeit the level was still significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that observed on Day 1 through Day 4:0900 h (Fig. 10).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. Effect of DEX on P- and E2-induced TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels in hypophysectomized hamster ovaries. Progesterone and E2 significantly (P < 0.05) increased ovarian TßRI and TßRII mRNA expression; however, DEX significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated the stimulatory effect of P and E2 and also inhibited basal TßRI mRNA expression. In contrast, DEX, by itself, stimulates ovarian TßRII gene expression. A combined dose of P and E2 failed to overcome the inhibitory effect of DEX. Dexamethasone appeared to have a stronger inhibitory effect on E2-induced TßRII mRNA expression. *Values significantly different from the HX animals; **values significantly different from P-only group; ***values significantly (P < 0.05) different from E2-only group



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. Serum-free cortisol levels in the hamster throughout the estrous cycle and during the periovulatory gonadotropin surge. *Values were significantly different from Day 1 through Day 3

DISCUSSION

This is the first report of a systematic analysis of hormonal regulation of TGF-ß receptor mRNA expression in the mammalian ovary. The functions of TßRI and TßRII have been widely studied in various cell types [13, 3036] but virtually no information is available about the hormonal regulation of TGF-ß receptor mRNA expression in the mammalian ovary. Because both TßRI and TßRII are essential for transducing the biological action of TGF-ß [34, 35], analysis of changes in the expression pattern of both of the receptor mRNA in the ovary during the reproductive cycle is critical to understand the hormonal modulation of ovarian functions. Whereas the presence of three TßRI and one TßRII gene transcripts has been documented for porcine granulosa cells [2], the size of hamster TßRII mRNA was closer to that reported for porcine granulosa cell (4.6 kb) [2] and human hepatoma cell line [37, 38]. The significance of the minor transcripts remains unclear.

The results of the present study reflect cumulative changes in receptor mRNA levels for the entire ovary resultant of the activities of several different cell types. However, the information is the first of a kind to establish that reproductive hormones modulate ovarian TGF-ß receptor mRNA levels. The increase in both TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels during the estrous cycle corroborates the findings on TßRII protein expression in the hamster ovary [1]. The preferential rise in TßRII mRNA levels at Day 1:0900 h may be due to the effect of secondary FSH surge that occurs at 2200 h on proestrous [28] and suggests that TßRII and TßRI mRNA expression are differentially influenced by gonadotropins, ovarian steroids, or both.

In the hamster, serum P levels are high on Days 1 and 2 of the estrous cycle while estrogen becomes dominant by Day 4:0900 h [1, 9]. In the present study, temporal changes in serum P and E2 levels during the estrous cycle correlate well with the increased levels of mRNA for both types of TßR. Although a clear-cut differential expression of TßRI and TßRII mRNA is evident in the hamster ovary throughout the estrous cycle, the unique periovulatory expression patterns indicate that additional control mechanisms may exist at that time. This is further evident by the sharp decline in the receptor mRNA levels by 1200 h, while serum levels of ovarian steroids, especially P, do not change, and from the results of studies done on HX hamsters. Whereas the modest reversal of TßRI mRNA expression by 1500 h may be due an increase in serum LH and/or ovarian steroids, the sharp decrease by 1600 h coincides with a very high level of serum progesterone. Because hormones require some latency before their effect can be detected, changes in the steady-state levels of receptor mRNA noted at 1700 h may be the result of increasing levels of P from 1400 h and onward.

The exact reason for the steady decline in TßRI and TßRII mRNA levels on proestrous, especially during the preovulatory gonadotropin surge, is not known. Because, gonadotropins as well as ovarian steroids increase receptor mRNA levels in HX hamster ovaries, it is likely that the observed negative regulation may be exerted by some other factors, particularly cortisol. This conjecture is supported by the evidence that DEX significantly inhibits both P- and E2-induced expression of TßRI and TßRII mRNA in the hamster ovary, and serum cortisol levels start increasing from 1200 h onward to reach a peak by 1600 h on proestrous. Activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis in the afternoon of proestrous [39], and a possible role for glucocorticoid in the timing of mating and ovulation [40] in the rat have been demonstrated. Mahesh and Brann [41] have documented that adrenocorticotropic and gonadotropic axes interact to regulate gonadotropin secretion. Moreover, serum levels of ACTH and corticosterone increase prior to the start of the periovulatory LH surge in the rat [39, 42, 43], and a midcycle increase in ACTH and cortisol has been reported in women [44]. Kerdelhue et al. [45] have demonstrated that serum levels of ACTH and cortisol increase significantly following a single injection of E2-benzoate to ovariectomized cynomolgous monkeys. Administration of ACTH to cyclic hamsters results in an increase in the utero-ovarian blood flow and serum P levels [46]. Recently, more direct evidence about the glucocorticoid inhibition of TßR gene transcription has been put forward by Chang et al. [47] who have shown that either cortisol or DEX significantly inhibits the synthesis of transcription factor CBFa1, which is critical for TGF-ß receptor gene transcription, in bone cells. All these lines of evidence suggest that a periovulatory rise in serum cortisol in the hamster may suppress TGF-ß receptor gene transcription to critically modulate the action of TGF-ß on ovarian cells. Moreover, the transcription machinery for TßRI mRNA synthesis may be more susceptible to cortisol inhibition than that of TßRII as evident from the relatively rapid decline in TßRI mRNA during the periovulatory period. Follicle-stimulating hormone stimulates the expression of TGF-ß2 and TßRII proteins in the hamster ovary [1] and in cultured human preantral follicles [48]. Therefore, intervention by cortisol may be important for temporal regulation of TGF-ß action on follicular cells. Because DEX is more potent than hydrocortisone and does not bind to corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), it may have exaggerated the cortisol effect to certain extent. However, it is clear that activation of ovarian glucocorticoid receptors during estrogen and progesterone action is inhibitory to TßR mRNA expression in ovarian cells. Because glucocorticoid directly inhibits TßR gene transcription [47], it is likely that at least part of the DEX-induced decline in the steady-state TßR mRNA levels in the hamster ovary is due to an inhibition of TßR mRNA synthesis. However, further studies are needed to determine this possibility. It is unclear why FSH preferentially attenuates the hCG-induced increase in TßRII mRNA in HX hamsters. Because FSH induces growth while LH causes terminal differentiation of follicles [9], attenuation of hCG action will prevent premature luteinization and/or thecal hyperactivity and allow regulated follicular development. Mural granulosa cells of hamster preovulatory follicles (terminally differentiated) express a very high level of TGF-ß ligand [6], TßRII [1] and LH receptor [8]. Therefore, premature overinduction of TßR in granulosa cells of developing follicles will be detrimental to follicle growth. Increased follicular production of E2, P, and androgen is the hallmark of follicle differentiation, and all these steroids significantly induce TßRII mRNA, and TßRII binds TGF-ß ligand [13]. Present results also document a direct stimulatory effect of androgen on ovarian TGF-ß receptor mRNA expression. Dihydrotestosterone has been shown to induce insulin-like growth factor type I and primary follicle development in the rhesus monkey [49].

In summary, the results of the present study provide strong evidence that the expression of TGF-ß receptor mRNA in the hamster ovary is positively regulated by gonadotropins and ovarian steroid hormones; however, the action of these hormones is temporally and critically modulated by cortisol.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I thank the National Pituitary Program and Dr. A.F. Parlow for their generosity in providing the FSH and LH. I also thank Dr. S.K. Das, University of Kansas Medical Center for helping me to set up the RT-PCR technique and Dr. S.K. Dey for allowing me to use his laboratory during the trial.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 29 December 1999.

1 This study was supported by a grant (HD28165) from NICHHD and the Olson Foundation of Omaha. Back

2 Correspondence: S.K. Roy, Department of Ob/Gyn and Physiology and Biophysics, BH4030, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984515 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-4515. FAX: 402 559 6164; skroy{at}unmc.edu Back

Accepted: January 28, 2000.

Received: November 22, 1999.

REFERENCES

  1. Roy SK, Kole AR. Transforming growth factor-ß receptor type II expression in the hamster ovary: cellular site(s), biochemical properties, and hormonal regulation. Endocrinology 1995; 136:4610–4620.[Abstract]
  2. Goddard I, Hendrick JC, Bnahmed M, Morera AM. Transforming growth factor ß receptor expression in cultured porcine granulosa cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995; 115:207–213.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Mulheron GW, Schomberg DW. Rat granulosa cells express transforming growth factor-ß type 2 messenger ribonucleic acid which is regulatable by follicle-stimulating hormone in vitro. Endocrinology 1990; 126:1777–1779.[Abstract]
  4. Hanazawa S, Takeshita A, Tsukamoto Y, Kawata Y, Takara KOI, Kitano S. Transforming growth factor-ß-induced gene expression of monocyte chemoattractant JE in mouse osteoblastic cells, MC3T3-E1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1991; 180:1130–1136.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Adashi EY, Resnick CE, Hernandez ER, May JV, Purchio AF, Twardzik DR. Ovarian transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß): cellular site(s), and mechanism(s) of action. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1989; 61:247–256.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Roy SK, Ogren C, Roy C, Lu B. Cell-type-specific localization of transforming growth factor ß2 and transforming growth factor-ß1 in the hamster ovary: differential regulation by follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. Biol Reprod 1992; 46:595–606.[Abstract]
  7. May JV, Stephenson LA, Turzcynski CJ, Fong HW, Mau YHL, Davis JS. Transforming growth factor ß expression in the porcine ovary: evidence that theca cells are the major secretory source during antral follicle development. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:485–496.[Abstract]
  8. Roy SK. Regulation of ovarian follicular development: a review of microscopic studies. Microsc Res Tech 1994; 27:83–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Greenwald GS, Roy SK. Follicular development and its control. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction, vol. 1, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994: 29–724.
  10. Adashi EY, Rohan RM. Intraovarian regulation: peptidergic signaling systems. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1992; 3:243–248.
  11. Lorenzo PL, Rebollar PG, Illera MJ, Illera JC, Illera M, Alvariño JMR. Stimulatory effect of insulin-like growth factor I and epidermal growth factor on the maturation of rabbit oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1996; 107:109–117.[Abstract]
  12. Chang WY, Shidaifat F, Uzumcu M, Lin YC. Effects of transforming growth factor-ß1 and activin-A on in vitro porcine granulosa cell steroidogenesis. Theriogenology 1996; 45:1463–1472.[CrossRef]
  13. Massagué J. Receptors for the TGF-ß family. Cell 1992; 69:1067–1070.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Massague J, Attisano L, Wrana JL. The TGF-ß family and its composite receptors. Trends Cell Biol 1994; 4:172–178.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Brand T, Schneider MD. Transforming growth factor-ß signal transduction. Circ Res 1996; 78:173–179.[Free Full Text]
  16. Roy SK. Epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-ß modulation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in hamster preantral and early antral follicles. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:552–557.[Abstract]
  17. Roy SK. Transforming growth factor-ß potentiation of follicle-stimulating hormone-induced deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in hamster preantral follicles is mediated by a latent induction of epidermal growth factor. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:558–563.[Abstract]
  18. Suzuki A, Shioda N, Maeda T, Tada M, Uneo N. A mouse TGF-ß type I receptor that requires type II receptor for ligand binding. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1994; 198:1063–1069.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Franzen P, Ten Dijke P, Ichijo H, Yamashita H, Schultz P, Heldin CH, Miyazono K. Cloning of a TGF-ß type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF-ß type II receptor. Cell 1993; 75:681–692.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Lawler S, Candia AF, Ebner R, Shum L, Lopez AR, Moses HL, Wright CVE, Derynck R. The murine type II TGF-ß receptor has a coincident embryonic expression and binding preference for TGF-ß1. Development 1994; 120:165–175.[Abstract]
  21. Lin HY, Wang X-F, Ng-Eaton E, Weinberg RA, Lodish HF. Expression cloning of the TGF-ß type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase. Cell 1992; 68:775–785.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Roy SK, Harris SG. Antisense epidermal growth factor oligodeoxynucleotides inhibit follicle-stimulating hormone-induced in vitro DNA and progesterone synthesis in hamster preantral follicles. Mol Endocrinol 1994; 8:1175–1181.[Abstract]
  23. Roy SK, Greenwald GS. Hormonal requirements for the growth and differentiation of hamster preantral follicles in long-term culture. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 87:103–114.[Abstract]
  24. Roy SK, Greenwald GS. Effects of FSH and LH on incorporation of [3H]thymidine into follicular DNA. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 78:201–209.[Abstract]
  25. Das SK, Tsukamura H, Paria BC, Andrews GK, Dey SK. Differential expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) gene and regulation of EGF-R bioactivity by progesterone and estrogen in the adult mouse uterus. Endocrinology 1994; 134:971–981.[Abstract]
  26. Watanabe M, Zinn AR, Page DC, Nishimoto T. Functional equivalence of human X- and Y-encoded isoforms of ribosomal protein S4 consistent with a role in Turner syndrome. Nat Genet 1993; 4:268–271.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Schatz DG, Seldon RF, Coen DM. Analysis of DNA sequences by blotting and hybridization. In: Ausubel FH et al. (eds.), Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, 2nd ed. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley and Sons; 1992: 24–30.
  28. Tsuchida K, Lewis KA, Mathews LS, Vale WW. Molecular characterization of rat transforming growth factor-ß type II receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1993; 191:790–795.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Bast JD, Greenwald GS. Serum profiles of follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and prolactin during the estrous cycle of the hamster. Endocrinology 1974; 94:1295–1299.[Medline]
  30. Mercier T, Gaillard-Sanchez I, Martel P, Seillan-Heberden C. Constitutive overexpression of c-fos protein in rat liver epithelial cells decreases TGF-ß synthesis and increases TGF-ß1 receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1995; 1266:64–72.[Medline]
  31. Miettinen PJ, Ebner R, Lopez AR, Derynck R. TGF-ß induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type I receptors. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:2021–2036.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Zhao Y, Young SL. Requirement of transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) type II receptor for TGF-ß-induced proliferation and growth. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:2369–2372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Attisano L, Cárcamo J, Ventura F, Weis FMB, Massagué J, Wrana JL. Identification of human activin and TGF-ß type I receptors that form heteromeric kinase complexes with type II receptors. Cell 1993; 75:671–680.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Derynck R. TGF-ß-receptor-mediated signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 1994; 19:548–553.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Kolodziejczyk SM, Hall BK. Signal transduction and TGF-ß superfamily receptors. Biochem Cell Biol 1996; 74:299–314.[Medline]
  36. Wrana JL, Attisano L, Wieser R, Ventura F, Massague J. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-ß receptor. Nature 1994; 370:341–347.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Inagaki M, Moustakas A, Lin HY, Lodish HF, Carr BI. Growth inhibition by transforming growth factor ß (TGF-ß) type I is restored in TGF-ß-resistant hepatoma cells after expression of TGF-ß receptor type II cDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:5359–5363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kadin ME, Cavaille-Coll MW, Gertz R, Massague J, Cheifetz S, George D. Loss of receptors for transforming growth factor beta in human T-cell malignancies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:6002–6006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Buckingham JC, Dohler KD, Wilson CA. Activity of the pituitary-adrenocortical system and thyroid gland during the oestrous cycle of the rat. J Endocrinol 1978; 78:359–366.[Abstract]
  40. Nequin LG, Schwartz NB. Adrenal participation in the timing of mating and LH release in the cyclic rat. Endocrinology 1971; 88:325–331.[Medline]
  41. Mahesh VB, Brann DW. Interaction between ovarian and adrenal steroids in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992; 41:495–513.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Raps D, Barthe PL, Desaulles PA. Plasma and adrenal corticosterone levels during the different phases of the sexual cycle in normal female rats. Experientia 1971; 15:339–340.
  43. Brann DW, Mahesh VB. Role of corticosteroids in female reproduction. FASEB J 1991; 5:2691–2698.[Abstract]
  44. Genazzani AR, Lemarchand-Beraud T, Aubert ML, Felber JP. Pattern of plasma ACTH, hGH, and cortisol during menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1975; 41:431–437.[Abstract]
  45. Kerdelhue B, Jones GS, Gordon H, Seltman H, Lenoir V, Prasadaniantz SM, Williams RF, Hodgen GD. Activation of the hypothalamo-anterior pituitary corticotropin-releasing hormone, adrenocorticotropin hormone and ß-endorphin systems during the estradiol 17ß-induced plasma LH surge in the ovariectomized monkey. J Neurosci Res 1995; 42:228–235.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Varga B, Greenwald GS. Cyclic changes in utero-ovarian blood flow and ovarian hormone secretion in the hamster: effects of adrenocorticotropin, luteinizing hormone, and follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocrinology 1979; 104:1525–1531.[Medline]
  47. Chang DJ, Ji C, Kim KK, Casinghino S, McCarthy TL, Centrella M. Reduction in transforming growth factor b receptor I expression and transcription factor CBFa1 on bone cells by glucocorticoid. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:4892–4896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Roy SK, Kole AR. Ovarian transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) receptors: in vitro effects of follicle stimulating hormone, epidermal growth factor and TGF-ß on receptor expression in human preantral follicles. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4:207–214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Vendola K, Zhou J, Wang J, Famuyiwa OA, Bievre M, Bondy CA. Androgens promote oocyte insulin-like growth factor I expression and initiation of follicle development in the primate ovary. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:353–357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Wang, E. R. Prossnitz, and S. K. Roy
Expression of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 30 in the Hamster Ovary: Differential Regulation by Gonadotropins and Steroid Hormones
Endocrinology, October 1, 2007; 148(10): 4853 - 4864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Yang and S. K. Roy
Transforming Growth Factor B1 Stimulated DNA Synthesis in the Granulosa Cells of Preantral Follicles: Negative Interaction with Epidermal Growth Factor
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2006; 75(1): 140 - 148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Wang and S. K. Roy
Expression of Growth Differentiation Factor 9 in the Oocytes Is Essential for the Development of Primordial Follicles in the Hamster Ovary
Endocrinology, April 1, 2006; 147(4): 1725 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
B. C Jayawardana, T. Shimizu, H. Nishimoto, E. Kaneko, M. Tetsuka, and A. Miyamoto
Hormonal regulation of expression of growth differentiation factor-9 receptor type I and II genes in the bovine ovarian follicle.
Reproduction, March 1, 2006; 131(3): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T.E. Hickey, D.L. Marrocco, F. Amato, L.J. Ritter, R.J. Norman, R.B. Gilchrist, and D.T. Armstrong
Androgens Augment the Mitogenic Effects of Oocyte-Secreted Factors and Growth Differentiation Factor 9 on Porcine Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
D. Tomic, K. P. Miller, H. A. Kenny, T. K. Woodruff, P. Hoyer, and J. A. Flaws
Ovarian Follicle Development Requires Smad3
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2004; 18(9): 2224 - 2240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-M. Zhang and S. K. Roy
Downregulation of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH)-Receptor Messenger RNA Levels in the Hamster Ovary: Effect of the Endogenous and Exogenous FSH
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1580 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Yang and S. K. Roy
Follicle Stimulating Hormone-Induced DNA Synthesis in the Granulosa Cells of Hamster Preantral Follicles Involves Activation of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-4 Rather Than Cyclin D2 Synthesis
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 509 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. K. Roy, J. Wang, and P. Yang
Dexamethasone Inhibits Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor (T{beta}R) Messenger RNA Expression in Hamster Preantral Follicles: Possible Association with NF-YA
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2180 - 2188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Wang, P. U. Rippstein, and B. K. Tsang
Role and Gonadotrophic Regulation of X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Expression During Rat Ovarian Follicular Development In Vitro
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2003; 68(2): 610 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Garnett, J. Wang, and S. K. Roy
Spatiotemporal Expression of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Messenger RNA and Protein in the Hamster Ovary: Follicle Stage-Specific Differential Modulation by Follicle-Stimulating Hormone, Luteinizing Hormone, Estradiol, and Progesterone
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1593 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Yang, A. Kriatchko, and S. K. Roy
Expression of ER-{alpha} and ER-{beta} in the Hamster Ovary: Differential Regulation by Gonadotropins and Ovarian Steroid Hormones
Endocrinology, June 1, 2002; 143(6): 2385 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Yang and S. K. Roy
Epidermal Growth Factor Modulates Transforming Growth Factor Receptor Messenger RNA and Protein Levels in Hamster Preantral Follicles In Vitro
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2001; 65(3): 847 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. R. Schwartz and S. K. Roy
Developmental Expression of Cytochrome P450 Side-Chain Cleavage and Cytochrome P450 17{alpha}-Hydroxylase Messenger Ribonucleic Acid and Protein in the Neonatal Hamster Ovary
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1586 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Roy, S. K.


HOME