Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 341-346 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular article

Sonication Per Se Is Not as Deleterious to Sperm Chromosomes as Previously Inferred1

Hiroyuki Tatenoa,b, Yasuyuki Kimuraa,c, and Ryuzo Yanagimachi2,,a

a Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 b Department of Biological Sciences, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fukushima Medical College, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan

ABSTRACT

Although sonication is a simple way to immobilize ("kill") spermatozoa prior to injection into oocytes, this has been thought to be destructive to sperm chromosomes. Mouse and human spermatozoa were immobilized by sonication and kept in various media for up to 2 h, then their nuclei were individually injected into mouse oocytes for the analysis of chromosomes at the first cleavage metaphase. In both the mouse and human, incidence of structural chromosome aberrations was much higher in the spermatozoa sonicated and stored in Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium for 2 h at 37.5°C than in those stored for 5 min in the same medium. We concluded, therefore, that it is not sonication per se but a prolonged exposure of sperm nuclei to extracellular milieu that is detrimental to sperm chromosomes. The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations of mouse and human spermatozoa was significantly reduced when the spermatozoa were sonicated and stored in K+-rich nucleus isolation medium containing EDTA. This suggests that sperm chromosome degradation following sperm immobilization by sonication is partly due to detrimental effects of a Na+-rich medium and of DNase on sperm chromatin. Ideally, it should be possible to prepare artificial media that maintain the integrity of sperm chromosomes for many hours after immobilization.

fertilization, IVF/ART, sperm, testes

INTRODUCTION

It is well established that sperm immobilization immediately before intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) increases the rate of successful fertilization [16]. The reason for this is not clear, but Yanagimachi [7] inferred that disruption or labilization of the sperm plasma membrane facilitates its disintegration and thereby directs contact of sperm components with the ooplasm. Sperm immobilization prior to ICSI has been accomplished by scoring the sperm tail with a micropipette [2, 6, 8], by sonication [911], by unprotected freezing [1214], by separation of head and tail by piezopulses [11], or by detergent treatment [11, 15, 16].

It has been reported that sonication frequently induces structural aberrations in human sperm chromosomes [9] and that human spermatozoa frozen without cryoprotection have high incidence of structural chromosome abnormalities [14]. It should be noted that physical or chemical disruption of the sperm plasma membrane results in an influx of extracellular medium into the cell. Thus, all intracellular organelles (including nucleus and mitochondria) will be exposed directly to an extracellular milieu (e.g., high Na+ and low K+) that is very different from the environment inside of the cell (low Na+ and high K+). Therefore, it is possible that the chromosomal damage reported by Martin et al. [9] and Rybouchkin et al. [14] is due either to direct action of physical stresses (sonication and freezing) or the influence of extracellular milieu on sperm nucleus (chromosomes).

We report here that sonication per se is not as detrimental to mouse and human sperm chromosomes as previously believed. It is a prolonged exposure of sperm nuclei to external milieu that is primarily responsible for deterioration of sperm chromosomes after membrane disruption (immobilization) of spermatozoa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Reagents and Media

All inorganic and organic reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless specifically stated. The medium for culturing oocytes was Chatot-Tasca-Ziomek (CZB) medium supplemented with 5.56 mM D-glucose [17, 18]. Oocytes were collected, and microsurgery was performed in modified CZB, with 20 mM Hepes-HCl, 5 mM NaHCO3, and 0.1 mg/ml polyvinyl alcohol (PVA; cold water soluble) in place of bovine serum albumin. This was designated as Hepes-CZB and used under 100% air. The pH value of Hepes-CZB was approximately 7.4.

The media used for collection and sonication of spermatozoa were Biggers-Whitten-Whittingham medium (BWW) [19] and a slightly modified nucleus isolation medium (NIM) [11]. The latter consisted of 121.6 mM KCl, 7.8 mM NaH2PO4, 1.4 mM KH2PO4, 10 mM EDTA disodium salt, and 0.01% PVA. Its pH was adjusted to 7.2 by addition of a small quantity of 1 M KOH in distilled water.

Animals

The mice used were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Laboratory Animal Service at the University of Hawaii and those prepared by the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Resource National Research Council (DHEW publication [NIH] 80–23, revised in 1985). The protocol of our animal handling and treatment was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Hawaii.

Preparation of Mouse Oocytes

B6D2F1 female mice, 7–11 wk of age, were induced to superovulate by i.p. injection of 5 IU eCG and 5 IU hCG, 48 h apart. Oocytes were collected from oviducts between 14 and 17 h after hCG injection. They were freed from cumulus cells by treatment with 0.1% (w/v) bovine testicular hyaluronidase (300 UPS units/mg; ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA) for 3–5 min in Hepes-CZB. The cumulus-free oocytes were rinsed thoroughly in CZB and kept in the medium for up to 3.5 h at 37.5°C under 5% CO2 in air.

Preparation of Mouse and Human Spermatozoa

Spermatozoa of B6D2F1 mice, 8–12 wk old, were collected from the cauda epididymides and suspended in approximately 5 ml of BWW or in NIM with (+) or without (-) 0.5 mM PMSF and 0.5 µg/ml leupeptin, both protease inhibitors. The sperm concentration in each suspension was adjusted to approximately 1 x 106 per milliliter. Regardless of media used, over 90% of spermatozoa displayed high motility.

Human spermatozoa were obtained by masturbation from two men of proven fertility. Semen samples were allowed to liquefy at 37.5°C for 1 h, mixed with 5 ml of BWW, and centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min. The sperm pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml of BWW, the sperm suspension was placed in the bottom of a 15-ml sterile centrifuge tube containing 10 ml of BWW, and motile spermatozoa were allowed to swim up at 37.5°C under 5% CO2 in air for 1 h. The upper 8 ml of the medium containing actively motile spermatozoa was carefully retrieved, transferred to another tube, and centrifuged again at 500 x g for 5 min. Sperm pellet was resuspended in approximately 5 ml of BWW or NIM(+), and the sperm concentration was adjusted to 1 x 105–6 per milliliter.

Sonication of Spermatozoa

The sperm suspension (5 ml) was transferred to a 10-ml beaker in ice water (0°C) and sonicated for 5 sec at 60% output of a sonicator (Brinwell Scientific, Rochester, NY; model BP-II, with 12-mm diameter horn). The beaker was shaken constantly during sonication. This treatment rendered all the spermatozoa motionless. More than 95% of mouse spermatozoa had their heads and tails separated. More than 95% of human spermatozoa had broken tails. Spermatozoa sonicated in BWW were kept in the same medium at 37.5°C under 5% CO2 in air; those sonicated in NIM(+) or NIM(-) were kept at 37.5°C in air.

Microinjection of Mouse Sperm Heads and Human Spermatozoa into Mouse Oocytes

Immediately before injection, each sperm suspension was centrifuged at 500 x g for 5 min. Each sperm pellet was resuspended in 5 ml NIM free of EDTA, PMSF, and leupeptin and centrifuged again. A small amount of sperm suspension (1 µl) was finally suspended in 5 µl of EDTA- and protease inhibitor-free NIM medium containing 12% polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP; Mr 360 000). Mouse sperm heads and human spermatozoa with broken tails in the NIM medium were individually injected into mouse oocytes according to the method of Kimura and Yanagimachi [20], except that all operations were carried out at room temperature (24–26°C) rather than at 16–17°C. The sperm injection was carried out within 1 h of the transfer to the NIM medium. Control mouse spermatozoa were unsonicated spermatozoa whose heads were separated from the tails immediately before injection into oocytes. A single motile spermatozoon was drawn, tail first, into the injection pipette until the head-midpiece junction was at the opening of the pipette. Upon application of a few piezopulses, the head was separated from the tail. Only the head was injected into an oocyte. Control human spermatozoa were prepared by drawing a single motile spermatozoon, tail first, into the injection pipette until the middle of tail was at the opening of the pipette. Several piezopulses were applied to the tail until the spermatozoon became completely immotile. The entire body of the spermatozoon was immediately injected into a mouse oocyte. Isolated heads or immobilized spermatozoa in experimental groups were left in test media for 5 min to 2 h after sonication before they were transferred into EDTA- and protease inhibitor-free NIM for injection into oocytes.

Activation and Culture of Injected Oocytes

Sperm-injected oocytes were kept in Hepes-CZB at room temperature for 10 min, then transferred into a droplet (50 µl) of CZB under mineral oil (Squibb, Princeton, NJ) and cultured at 37.5°C under 5% CO2 in air. Preliminary experiments revealed that the rate of oocyte activation is greatly influenced by the time interval between sperm sonication and injection. Although more than 90% of the oocytes were activated when fresh human spermatozoa were used, only about 30% were activated by the spermatozoa sonicated ("killed") 2–3 h previously. Therefore, all the oocytes injected with spermatozoa, regardless of sperm's age after immobilization, were activated by 30 min of treatment with 5 mM SrCl2 in Ca2+-free CZB [21]. Six to 8 h later, eggs were examined with an inverted microscope for the presence or absence of pronuclei. Those with two distinct pronuclei were transferred into 0.2 ml CZB containing 0.006 µg/ml vinblastine and cultured until they reached metaphase of the first cleavage division.

Chromosome Preparation and Analysis

Between 19 and 21 h after sperm injection, metaphase eggs were treated with 1% pronase (1000 tyrosine units/mg; Kaken Pharmaceuticals, Tokyo, Japan) for 5 min at room temperature to soften zonae pellucidae. They were then treated with a hypotonic solution (1:1 mixture of 1% sodium citrate and 30% fetal bovine serum) for 10 min at room temperature. Chromosomes were spread on slides by the gradual-fixation/air-drying method [22]. The preparations were stained with 2% Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in buffered saline solution (pH 6.8) for 8 min for conventional chromosome analysis. Subsequently, chromosomes were C-banded according to Sumner [23], with some modifications to detect dicentric chromosomes and acentric fragments. Briefly, the slides were treated with 0.2 N HCl for 30 min at room temperature, 5% Ba(OH)2 for 2 min at 50°C, and 2x saline sodium citrate (2x SSC) for 5 min at 50°C, followed by staining in 4% Giemsa for 10 min.

Statistical Analysis

Fisher's exact probability test and chi-square test were used to analyze data on percentage of eggs and sperm with chromosome aberrations, respectively. Differences in the number of aberrant chromosomes per cell were analyzed by Student's t-test or Welch's t-test. Differences at P < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Chromosome Analysis of Mouse Spermatozoa after Sonication

Of a total of 533 mouse oocytes injected with mouse sperm heads, 438 survived, and 388 (89%) were fertilized. Out of the fertilized eggs, 369 (95%) developed to the first cleavage metaphase, and 366 eggs were subjected to chromosome analysis. The remainder were unsuitable for chromosome analysis because their chromosomes were underspread. The incidence of chromosome aberrations and the number and types of structural chromosome aberrations in the mouse zygotes are summarized in Table 1. When the spermatozoa were kept in BWW after sonication, the incidence of structural chromosome aberrations in zygotes increased sharply with increasing time between sonication and injection (9% in the control, 35% in 5-min storage after sonication, and 92% in 2-h storage after sonication). Many of the zygotes created with 2-h-stored sperm heads had multiple chromosome aberrations (Fig. 1, A and B), their incidence being highest (8.61 per zygote) when sperm heads were stored in BWW for 2 h. Storing sperm heads in NIM seems to be less damaging to sperm chromosomes. The presence of protease inhibitors in NIM did not reduce the time-dependent increase in the incidence of structural chromosome aberrations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Chromosome analysis of one-cell eggs (zygotes) injected with mouse sperm heads sonicated and stored in BWW or in NIM with (+) or without (-) protease inhibitors



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Structural chromosome aberrations in mouse and human spermatozoa stored for 2 h in BWW after sonication. A) Conventional Giemsa staining of mouse sperm complement shows acentric fragments of chromatid type (arrows). B) C-band staining of A) shows that there are three dicentric chromosomes (large arrows) and five acentric fragments of chromosome type (small arrows). C) Conventional Giemsa staining of human sperm chromosomes with multiple aberrations. A dicentric chromosome (large arrow), acentric fragments (small arrows) of both chromosome type and chromatid type, and a ring chromosome (arrowhead) are identified. Bars = 10 µm

In this study, we classified structural chromosome aberrations into four categories [24]: 1) chromosome-type break, 2) chromosome-type exchange, 3) chromatid-type break, and 4) chromatid-type exchange. Breaks and exchanges of chromosome-type were predominant in all experimental groups (Table 1). No significant increase in incidence of zygotes showing aneuploidy or polyploidy was detected in any of the experimental groups.

Chromosome Analysis of Human Spermatozoa after Sonication

Of 372 mouse oocytes injected with human spermatozoa, 312 survived, and 239 (77%) were fertilized. Of the fertilized eggs, 219 (92%) reached the first cleavage metaphase. It was possible to distinguish human chromosomes from mouse chromosomes in the interspecies hybrid zygotes because of their marked structural differences. A total of 216 human sperm chromosome sets were analyzed (Table 2). The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations and the number of chromosome aberrations per sperm in the spermatozoa sonicated and stored for 5 min in BWW and for 2 h in NIM(+) were similar to those in the control spermatozoa. The incidence of structural chromosome aberrations increased sharply when sonicated spermatozoa were stored in BWW for 2 h. As in the mouse spermatozoa, most structural chromosome aberrations were of chromosome type (Table 2 and Fig. 1C). There was no significant increase in the incidence of aneuploidy or polyploidy in any of the experimental groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Chromosome analysis of one-cell eggs (zygotes) injected with human spermatozoa sonicated and stored in BWW and NIM with (+) protease inhibitors

DISCUSSION

During transport through the epididymis, the nuclei of mammalian spermatozoa are physically and chemically stabilized by extensive cross-linking of nuclear protamines by disulfide bonds [2527]. We have previously reported that sperm nuclei are able to decondense and transform into normal-looking pronuclei even after harsh treatments such as heating at 90°C [28], dehydration in alcohol [29], or sonication [11]. Recently, Wakayama and Yanagimachi [30] obtained normal mouse offspring by injecting freeze-dried spermatozoa into oocytes.

Martin et al. [9] and Rybouchkin et al. [14] reported that human sperm nuclei (chromosomes) are vulnerable to physical stresses, such as sonication and unprotected cryopreservation. This may not be the case in the mouse because we obtained normal offspring from the oocytes injected with sperm heads that were sonicated [11] or frozen-thawed without any cryoprotection [31]. The present study revealed that it is not sonication per se that is detrimental to sperm chromosomes but rather a prolonged exposure of membrane-damaged spermatozoa to storage media. Because the sperm plasma membrane has no self-repairing ability, even a local disruption of the membrane is terminal to the spermatozoon. Both sonication and unprotected cryopreservation must damage sperm plasma membrane irreversibly, resulting in the influx of medium components into the cells. Sperm organelles (including the nucleus) are then directly exposed to the medium, the ionic composition of which is very different from that of the sperm's intracellular compartment. The longer the exposure of sperm nuclei to medium components, the more lesions to their chromosomes. Neither Martin et al. [9] or Rybouchkin et al. [14] described how long they kept sonicated or frozen-thawed spermatozoa in media before injection into oocytes. Therefore, it is very likely that the increased incidence of structural chromosome aberrations they reported is due presumably to a prolonged sojourn of membrane-damaged ("killed") spermatozoa in the medium prior to injection.

We found that both mouse and human sperm chromosomes are damaged more when sperm nuclei are kept in BWW medium (a cell culture medium) than when they are kept in NIM medium (an artificial medium with high K+ and low Na+ concentrations; Tables 1 and 2). In all cells, the cytosolic concentration of K+ is much higher than that of Na+. The intracellular concentrations of K+ and Na+ in bovine epididymal spermatozoa have been estimated to be 120 ± 5 mM and 14 ± 2 mM, respectively [32]. Thus, when sperm plasma membrane is damaged (e.g., by sonication), sperm nuclei are inevitably exposed to the medium with significantly higher concentration of Na+ and lower concentration of K+. This may cause deleterious changes in chromatin (DNA and associated proteins), resulting in structural chromosome aberrations. Kuretake et al. [11] and Suzuki et al. [33] reported that the ability of isolated mouse sperm heads (nuclei) and spermatid nuclei to participate in normal development is maintained significantly longer in a K+-rich medium than in Na+-rich cell culture media. Perhaps the nuclei (chromosomes) of plasma membrane-damaged spermatozoa and of spermatids are less damaged by K+-rich (NIM) media than by Na+-rich (BWW) media.

There is another possibility: that the presence of EDTA and the absence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ in NIM medium reduce the digestion of sperm DNA by endogenous nucleases because the enzyme activity is detected in murine spermatozoa [34, 35]. It is unlikely that proteases released from acrosomes and other compartments of the spermatozoa are involved in the deterioration of sperm chromatin because the presence of protease inhibitors in NIM medium did not prevent the deterioration of sperm chromatin (Table 1). Chromosome study of spermatozoa stored at 4°C after sonication would be needed in order to understand the involvement of endogenous enzymes in deterioration of sperm chromatin.

The present study revealed that mouse sperm chromosomes deteriorate more quickly than human sperm chromosomes after the spermatozoa are immobilized (Tables 1 and 2). Before experiments, we expected the opposite result because human sperm chromatin is known to be less stabilized by disulfide bonds than that of many other species (e.g., chinchilla, mouse, hamster, rat, guinea pig, rabbit, and bull) [36, 37]. Moreover, when viewed with an electron microscope, chromatin of human spermatozoa appear to be less dense [38, 39] than that of most other species. In this study, differences in chromatin structure between human and mouse sperm nuclei do not appear to account for their differential sensitivity to DNA damage during storage in BWW or NIM medium.

In ICSI technique, removing the tails is particularly helpful when trying to inject sperm with long tails, and disruption of the sperm plasma membrane facilitates contact of sperm components with the ooplasm. Sonication is a simple and effective way to separate sperm heads from tails or to damage the sperm plasma membrane. It was somewhat disappointing that chromosomes in isolated sperm heads, in particular those of the mouse, did not remain intact for many hours in K+-rich NIM medium as we had hoped (Tables 1 and 2). However, a delay in sperm chromosome deterioration in the NIM medium is encouraging for our search for ideal media that maintain the integrity of sperm chromosomes for many hours after sperm nucleus isolation and/or sperm immobilization.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. J. Michael Bedford, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cornell Medical College, for reading the original manuscript and giving us invaluable advice.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 2 February 2000.

1 This study was supported by grants (HD-34362 and HD-38205 to R.Y.) from the National Institutes of Health, the Victoria S. and Bradley L. Geist Foundation, and The Kosasa Family Foundation. H.T. was a research fellow of the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. Back

2 Correspondence: Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, 1951 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI 96822. FAX: 808 956 5474; yana{at}hawaii.edu Back

Accepted: February 29, 2000.

Received: January 1, 2000.

REFERENCES

  1. Catt J, O'Neil C. Manipulation of sperm before intracytoplasmic sperm injection improves fertilization rates. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:1210–1212.[Medline]
  2. Dozortsev D, Rybouchkin A, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Sperm plasma membrane damage prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a necessary condition for sperm nucleus decondensation. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:2960–2964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Fishel S, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Green S, Hunter A, Dowell K, Thornton S. Systematic examination of immobilizing spermatozoa before intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the human. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:497–500.[Free Full Text]
  4. Gerris J, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Joostens M, Eestermans W, Ryckaert G. ICSI and severe male-factor infertility: breaking the sperm tail prior to injection. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:484–486.[Free Full Text]
  5. Van den Bergh M, Bertrand E, Biramane J, Englert Y. Importance of breaking a spermatozoon's tail before intracytoplasmic injection: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:2819–2820.[Free Full Text]
  6. Palermo GD, Schlegel PN, Colombero LT, Zaninovic N, Moy F, Rosenwaks Z. Aggressive sperm immobilization prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection with immature spermatozoa improves fertilization and pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:1023–1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection experiments using the mouse as a model. Hum Reprod 1998; 13(suppl 1):87–98.
  8. Hoshi K, Yanagida K, Yazawa H, Katayose H, Sato A. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection using immobilized, or motile human spermatozoon. Fertil Steril 1995; 63:1241–1245.[Medline]
  9. Martin RH, Ko E, Rademaker A. Human sperm chromosome complements after microinjection of hamster eggs. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 84:179–186.[Abstract]
  10. Keefer CL. Fertilization by sperm injection in the rabbit. Gamete Res 1989; 22:59–69.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Kuretake S, Kimura Y, Hoshi K, Yanagimachi R. Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes injected with sperm heads. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:789–795.[Abstract]
  12. Goto K. Bovine microinjection and embryo transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 1993; 36:288–290.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Goto K, Kinoshita A, Takuma Y, Ogawa K. Fertilisation of bovine oocytes by the injection of immobilized, killed spermatozoa. Vet Rec 1990; 127:517–520.[Abstract]
  14. Rybouchkin AV, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Unprotected freezing of human spermatozoa exerts a detrimental effect on their oocyte activating capacity and chromosome integrity. Zygote 1996; 4:263–268.[Medline]
  15. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Fertilization and development of mouse oocytes injected with membrane-damaged spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1997; 12:2792–2801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ahmadi A, Ng SC. Influence of sperm plasma membrane destruction on human sperm head decondensation and pronuclear formation. Arch Androl 1999; 42:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Chatot CL, Ziomek CA, Bavister BD, Lewis JL, Torres I. An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 86:679–688.[Abstract]
  18. Chatot CL, Tasca RJ, Ziomek CA. Development of 1-cell embryos from different strains of mice in CZB medium. Biol Reprod 1990; 42:432–440.[Abstract]
  19. Biggers JP, Whitten WK, Whittingham DG. The culture of mouse embryos in vitro. In: Daniel JC (ed.), Methods in Mammalian Embryology. San Francisco, CA: Freeman; 1971: 86–116.
  20. Kimura Y, Yanagimachi R. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:709–720.[Abstract]
  21. Bos-Mikich A, Whittingham DG, Jones KT. Meiotic and mitotic Ca2+ oscillations affects cell composition in resulting blastocysts. Dev Biol 1997; 182:172–179.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Mikamo K, Kamiguchi Y. A new assessment system for chromosomal mutagenicity using oocytes and early zygotes of the Chinese hamster. In: Ishihara T, Sasaki MS (eds.), Radiation-Induced Chromosome Damage in Man. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1983: 411–432.
  23. Sumner AT. A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 1972; 75:304–306.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Savage JRK. Classification and relationships of induced chromosomal structural changes. J Med Genet 1976; 13:103–122.[Abstract]
  25. Calvin HI, Bedford JM. Formation of disulfide bonds in the nucleus and accessory structures of mammalian spermatozoa during maturation in the epididymis. J Reprod Fertil 1971; 13(suppl 13):65–75.
  26. Bellve AR, O'Brien DA. The mammalian spermatozoa: structure and temporal assembly. In: Hartman JF (ed.), Mechanism and Control of Animal Fertilization. New York: Academic Press; 1983: 55–137.
  27. Bedford JM, Hoskins DD. The mammalian spermatozoa: morphology, biochemistry and physiology. In: Laming GE (ed.), Marshall's Physiology of Reproduction, vol. 2, 4th ed. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 1990: 379–568.
  28. Yanagida K, Yanagimachi R, Perreault SD, Kleinfeld RG. Thermostability of sperm nuclei assessed by microinjection into hamster oocytes. Biol Reprod 1991; 44:440–447.[Abstract]
  29. Katayose H, Matsuda J, Yanagimachi R. The ability of dehydrated hamster and human sperm nuclei to develop into pronuclei. Biol Reprod 1992; 47:277–284.[Abstract]
  30. Wakayama T, Yanagimachi R. Development of normal mice from oocytes injected with freeze-dried spermatozoa. Nat Biotechnol 1998; 16:639–641.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Wakayama T, Whittingham DG, Yanagimachi R. Production of normal offspring from mouse oocytes injected with spermatozoa cryopreserved with or without cryoprotection. J Reprod Fertil 1998; 112:11–17.[Abstract]
  32. Babcock DF. Examination of the intracellular ionic environment and of ionophore action by null point measurements employing the fluorescein chromophore. J Biol Chem 1983; 258:6380–6389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Suzuki K, Yanagida K, Yanagimachi R. Comparison of the media for isolation and storage of round spermatid nuclei before intracytoplasmic injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998; 15:154–158.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Stephan H, Polzar B, Rauch F, Zanotti S, Ulke C, Mannherz HG. Distribution of deoxyribonuclease I (DNAse I) and p53 in rat testis and their correlation with apoptosis. Histochem Cell Biol 1996; 106:383–393.[Medline]
  35. Maione B, Pittoggi C, Achene L, Lorenzini R, Spadafora C. Activation of endogenous nucleases in mature sperm cells upon interaction with exogenous DNA. DNA Cell Biol 1997; 16:1087–1097.[Medline]
  36. Calvin HI. Comparative analysis of the nuclear basic proteins in rat, human, guinea pig, mouse and rabbit spermatozoa. Biochim Biophys Acta 1976; 434:377–389.[Medline]
  37. Perreault SD, Barbee RR, Elstein KH, Zucker RM, Keefer CL. Interspecies differences in the stability of mammalian sperm nuclei assessed in vivo by sperm microinjection and in vitro by flow cytometry. Biol Reprod 1988; 39:157–167.[Abstract]
  38. Bedford JM. Biology of primate spermatozoa. In: Lucken WP (ed.), Contributions to Primatology, vol. 3. Basel, Switzerland: Karger; 1974: 97–139.
  39. Zamboni L. Physiology and pathophysiology of the human spermatozoon: the role of electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc Tech 1991; 17:412–436.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Kusakabe, R. Yanagimachi, and Y. Kamiguchi
Mouse and human spermatozoa can be freeze-dried without damaging their chromosomes
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Perez-Crespo, P. Moreira, B. Pintado, and A. Gutierrez-Adan
Factors From Damaged Sperm Affect Its DNA Integrity and Its Ability to Promote Embryo Implantation in Mice
J Androl, January 1, 2008; 29(1): 47 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y. Yamauchi, A. Ajduk, J. M Riel, and M. A Ward
Ejaculated and Epididymal Mouse Spermatozoa Are Different in Their Susceptibility to Nuclease-Dependent DNA Damage and in Their Nuclease Activity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2007; 77(4): 636 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Tateno and Y. Kamiguchi
Evaluation of Chromosomal Risk Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 336 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S. P Kodithuwakku, A. Miyamoto, and M. P B Wijayagunawardane
Spermatozoa stimulate prostaglandin synthesis and secretion in bovine oviductal epithelial cells
Reproduction, June 1, 2007; 133(6): 1087 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Ogonuki, K. Mochida, H. Miki, K. Inoue, M. Fray, T. Iwaki, K. Moriwaki, Y. Obata, K. Morozumi, R. Yanagimachi, et al.
Spermatozoa and spermatids retrieved from frozen reproductive organs or frozen whole bodies of male mice can produce normal offspring
PNAS, August 29, 2006; 103(35): 13098 - 13103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
P. Comizzoli, D. E. Wildt, and B. S. Pukazhenthi
Poor Centrosomal Function of Cat Testicular Spermatozoa Impairs Embryo Development In Vitro after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 252 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Suganuma, C. M. Walden, T. D. Butters, F. M. Platt, R. A. Dwek, R. Yanagimachi, and A. C. van der Spoel
Alkylated Imino Sugars, Reversible Male Infertility-Inducing Agents, Do Not Affect the Genetic Integrity of Male Mouse Germ Cells During Short-Term Treatment Despite Induction of Sperm Deformities
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2005; 72(4): 805 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
B. Sotolongo, T. T. F. Huang, E. Isenberger, and W. S. Ward
An Endogenous Nuclease in Hamster, Mouse, and Human Spermatozoa Cleaves DNA into Loop-Sized Fragments
J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 272 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Watanabe
Frequent structural chromosome aberrations in immotile human sperm exposed to culture media
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Szczygiel, S. Moisyadi, and W. S. Ward
Expression of Foreign DNA Is Associated with Paternal Chromosome Degradation in Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection-Mediated Transgenesis in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2003; 68(5): 1903 - 1910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Davies and S. Varmuza
Development to Blastocyst Is Impaired When Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Is Performed with Abnormal Sperm from Infertile Mice Harboring a Mutation in the Protein Phosphatase 1c{gamma} Gene
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1470 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Kaneko, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Effect of pH Value of Freeze-Drying Solution on the Chromosome Integrity and Developmental Ability of Mouse Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2003; 68(1): 136 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Szczygiel and W. S. Ward
Combination of Dithiothreitol and Detergent Treatment of Spermatozoa Causes Paternal Chromosomal Damage
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1532 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Szczygiel, H. Kusakabe, R. Yanagimachi, and D. G. Whittingham
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Is More Efficient than In Vitro Fertilization for Generating Mouse Embryos from Cryopreserved Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2002; 67(4): 1278 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Mizuno, K. Hoshi, and T. Huang
Fertilization and embryo development in a mouse ICSI model using human and mouse sperm after immobilization in polyvinylpyrrolidone
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2350 - 2355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Kusakabe, M. A. Szczygiel, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Maintenance of genetic integrity in frozen and freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa
PNAS, November 9, 2001; (2001) 241517598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Cozzi, F. Monier-Gavelle, N. Lievre, M. Bomsel, and J.P. Wolf
Mouse Offspring after Microinjection of Heated Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1518 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Kusakabe, M. A. Szczygiel, D. G. Whittingham, and R. Yanagimachi
Inaugural Article: Maintenance of genetic integrity in frozen and freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa
PNAS, November 20, 2001; 98(24): 13501 - 13506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tateno, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yanagimachi, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS