Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 361-367 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Expression of Estrogen Receptor Coactivators in the Rat Uterus1

Kenneth P. Nephew2,,a, Shahla Raya, Myint Hlainga, Amrita Ahluwaliaa, Simon D. Wua, Xinghua Longa,b, Salman M. Hyderc, and Robert M. Bigsbyb

a Medical Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Bloomington, Indiana 47405 b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 c Department of Integrative Biology, Pharmacology, and Physiology, University of Texas-Houston, Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT

Nuclear receptor coactivators associate in a ligand-dependent manner with estrogen receptors (ER) and other nuclear receptors, and they enhance ligand-dependent transcriptional activation. This study examined basal coactivator expression in rat uterus to investigate if expression of these genes is regulated by estradiol-17ß or tamoxifen. Ovariectomized mature and immature rats were injected with estradiol-17ß, tamoxifen, or vehicle (i.e., sesame oil) alone. Uteri were collected and analyzed for changes in coactivator mRNA expression using Northern blot and in situ hybridization analyses. Constitutive uterine mRNA expression of switch protein for antagonist (SPA), SRC-1, GRIP1, RAC3, RIP140, and p300 mRNAs was observed in control uteri, and treatment with ER ligands did not alter coactivator mRNA levels. The data suggest that expression of these coactivator genes is not sensitive to estradiol or tamoxifen in the rat uterus. No cell type-specific pattern of expression was apparent in uterine sections from mature and immature rats; however, silver grains were more abundant in luminal and glandular epithelial cells compared with the stroma and myometrium, indicating that coactivator mRNA levels vary among the uterine compartments. Thus, to our knowledge, we show for the first time that there is constitutive expression of several uterine nuclear receptor coactivators in a physiological setting that remains insensitive to estrogenic regulation. Furthermore, we speculate that higher constitutive levels of coactivator expression in glandular and luminal epithelial cells may be associated with increased hormonal responsiveness by these uterine compartments.

estradiol, estradiol receptor, female reproductive tract, hormone action, progesterone, progesterone receptor, steroid hormones, steroid hormone receptors

INTRODUCTION

Estrogens play a central role in controlling multiple reproductive processes, and estrogen receptors (ER) belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcriptional regulatory proteins related by structure and function [1]. On ligand activation, ER forms a dimer that binds to specific DNA sequences, named estrogen-response elements, that are located in the promoters of target genes [2]. Stimulation of the transcription of specific estrogen-responsive genes achieves subsequent physiological responses. Recently, several proteins have been described that associate with ER, and with several other nuclear receptors, in a ligand-dependent manner. These proteins, which enhance ligand-dependent transcriptional activation by ER and other nuclear receptors, have been classified as coactivators, and they include SRC-1 [3] and related proteins such as GRIP1/TIF2/SRC-2 [47], RAC3/ACTR/p/CIP/A1B1/SRC-3 [812], RIP140/RIP160 [13, 14], ERAP-140/ERAP-160 [15], CBP/p300 [1621], and L7/ switch protein for antagonist (SPA) [22]. Although coactivator mRNAs are ubiquitously expressed, the levels of expression vary among tissues and organs [4, 23, 24], suggesting that the level of coactivator expression contributes to the variations in tissue hormone responsiveness.

The antiestrogen tamoxifen is the most commonly prescribed treatment for breast cancer [25, 26], and it is the only drug known to prevent breast cancer [27]. An antagonist in the breast, it also acts as an agonist for specific responses in other tissues. In the immature rat uterus, tamoxifen stimulates a dramatic hypertrophy of the luminal epithelium equal to or greater than the effect of estradiol, but it induces only a slight proliferative effect in ovariectomized rat uterus and blocks estradiol-induced hyperplasia [2830]. In the endometrial stroma, the hyperplastic effect of tamoxifen approaches that induced by estradiol [31]. The uterine stimulatory effect of tamoxifen in humans is associated with an increased incidence of endometrial cancer among women taking the drug to either treat [25, 26] or prevent [27] breast cancer. The remarkable tissue- and response-specific behavior of tamoxifen is mediated by ER, and enhancement of the agonist activity of tamoxifen-occupied ER by coactivators has recently been reported [24, 32, 33], indicating that the relative expression of coactivators and corepressors can modulate the antiestrogen regulation of ER transcriptional activity. In particular, SPA may play a key role [22, 32] in tissue-specific sensitivity to mixed antiestrogens.

Considering these observations, the objectives of the present study were to determine the cell-specific expression pattern of SPA, SRC-1, GRIP1, RAC3, RIP140, and p300 mRNA in the rat uterus and to investigate if the expression of coactivator mRNA levels in vivo is regulated by estradiol or tamoxifen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

All animal studies were performed under protocols and procedures approved by the Bloomington Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accord with National Institutes of Health (NIH) standards established by the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals and by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Mature (150–200 g) and immature (~23 days old and 40–45 g) female Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN). Mature or immature animals were ovariectomized 3 wk or 5 days before an experiment, respectively. Rats were given animal chow and water ad libitum and maintained on a 12L:12D cycle, with lights-on at 0700 h. Animals (n = 4 per group) were injected s.c. in the periscapular area with 40 µg/kg body weight (BW) of estradiol-17ß, 40 mg/kg BW of progesterone (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and 1 mg/kg BW tamoxifen (citrate salt; Sigma) or sesame oil vehicle (Sigma), and then sacrificed 0, 3, 6, 24, or 72 h later. The dosages of estradiol, progesterone, and tamoxifen were based on our own earlier work [3436]. Progesterone-treated animals were included, because ovariectomy increases not only ER levels but progesterone receptor expression levels in the uterus as well [37]. Uteri were collected quickly and trimmed of extraneous connective tissues. One uterine horn from each animal was placed immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for isolation of total RNA for Northern blot analysis. The other uterine horn from each rat was placed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS overnight at 4°C, washed with ice-cold PBS, and incubated overnight with 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C. Tissue was then placed in embedding medium (TBS tissue freezing medium; Triangle Biomedical Sciences, Durham, NC) in molds, frozen on the surface of liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C for use during in situ hybridization analysis.

Synthesis of cDNA and cRNA Probes

The constructs used in this study were a 2.3-kilobase (kb) SRC-1 fragment in pBluescript (rat SRC-1 in pCDNA; gift from Dr. T.-P. Yao, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA), rat RAC3 (2.3 kb) in pCMX-F (gift from Dr. D. Chen, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA), mouse RIP140 (7.2 kb) in pBluescript (gift from Dr. M. Parker, Imperial Cancer Research Fund, UK), rat p300 (9.0 kb) in pBluescript (gift from Dr. M. Brown, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and the 1-A cDNA (2 kb; gift from Dr. C.R. Lyttle, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Rat GRIP1 and SPA were both in pBluescript. Full-length rat ER{alpha} cDNA (2 kb) in pGEM3Z (pFLER) was kindly supplied by Dr. M. Shupnik (University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville). Rat c-fos cDNA (2.2 kb; gift provided by Dr. T. Curran, St. Jude's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN) was cloned into pBluescript II SK+ as described elsewhere [36]. For Northern blot analysis, cDNAs were digested with appropriate restriction enzymes and labeled with [32P]deoxycytidine 5'-[{alpha}-32P]-triphosphate, triethylammonium salt using the Rediprime II kit (Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL). For in situ hybridization, 35S-labeled sense and antisense RNA probes were transcribed using the Promega Riboprobe Gemini Core System II transcription kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The cDNAs were linearized using appropriate restriction enzymes. To reduce primary transcripts to 200 bases, an alkaline hydrolysis was performed [36, 38, 39], and the probes were purified, air-dried, dissolved in hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 0.3 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris [pH, 8.0], 50 mM EDTA [pH, 8.0], 20 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM Na3PO4, 1x Denhardt's; 10% dextran sulfate, and 0.5 mg/ml yeast tRNA), and stored at -80°C.

RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Analysis

Uteri were pooled according to treatment groups (n = 4 animals per time-point). Total cellular RNA was isolated using TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) according to the manufacturer's protocol. As described elsewhere [35], tcRNA (15 µg) was fractionated on denaturing 1% agarose gels, transferred to Duralon-UV membrane (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) by electrophoresis (2 h at 70 V) in TAE (40 mM Tris acetate [pH 8.0] and 2 mM Na2 EDTA). Membranes were cross-linked by ultraviolet light (Stratagene) and prehybridized at 60°C in Rapid-Hyb buffer (Amersham) for 30 min. Incubation continued for 2.5 h after the addition of 1 x 106 cpm/µl [32P]-cDNA probes. The membranes were washed once at room temperature for 20 min in 2x sodium chloride, sodium citrate buffer (SSC) containing 0.1% SDS, then at 65°C for 15 min in 1x SSC and 0.1% SDS, and finally at 65°C in 0.5% SSC and 1% SDS for 15 min. The membranes were exposed to x-ray film at -80°C for 7–10 days with intensifying screens. The membranes were dehybridized for subsequent use at 65°C for 20 min in 6x SSC and 0.1% SDS containing 50% formamide. Northern blot experiments were repeated on two separate membranes. The optical densities of autoradiograms for coactivator and 1-A bands were measured and quantified using imaging densitometer and Molecular Analyst Software (G5670; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Levels of coactivators were normalized to those of 1-A mRNA, which is a constitutively expressed gene in the rat uterus [40].

In Situ Hybridization

Uteri were cryosectioned (10 µm), and sections were then mounted on slides, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1x PBS, dehydrated, dried, and stored at -80°C. As described elsewhere [36, 38, 39], sections were refixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, treated with proteinase K, fixed again in 4% paraformaldehyde, treated with acetic anhydride, rinsed in water, dehydrated, and dried at room temperature. Next, 35S-labeled antisense and sense cRNA probes in hybridization buffer were heat-denatured and then added to tissue sections (15 µl/coverslip, probe concentration of 1 x 104 to 1 x 105 cpm/µl), coverslipped, and incubated at a hybridization temperature of 50–55°C for 16 h. Coverslips were removed, and sections were then washed and treated with RNases to remove unhybridized probe, dried, dipped in Ilford Nuclear Research Emulsion K5 (Polysciences, Warrington, PA), and stored at 4°C for 6–10 days.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In the untreated (i.e., 0-h) rat uterus, constitutive expression of SRC-1, SPA, RAC3, RIP140, GRIP1, p300 and mRNAs was detected in ovariectomized mature and immature animals (Figs. 1 and 2). Rat 1-A was used as an internal control to monitor loading efficiency. SRC-1 was expressed as two high-molecular-weight transcripts of approximately 5.5 and 8.5 kb of approximately equal band intensity, and SPA was expressed as a single mRNA of approximately 0.8 kb. Single, high-molecular-weight mRNAs of approximately 7.5, 7.5, 9, and 9.5 kb were detected for RAC3, RIP140, GRIP1, and p300, respectively. In the mouse, uterine expression of similar-size mRNAs encoding GRIP1/TIF2 and RAC3/p/CIP has been reported [41]. The sizes of the SRC1 and p300 mRNA that we observed in the rat uterus were consistent with those in a recent report concerning expression of coactivator transcripts in a variety of rat tissues, including endocrine and reproductive tract organs [23].



View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Northern blot analysis comparing constitutive uterine expression of SRC-1, SPA, RAC3, RIP140, GRIP1, and p300 and relative expression after estradiol-17ß treatment of mature (A) and immature (B) rats. Sprague-Dawley rats (ovariectomized) received a s.c. injection of estradiol-17ß (40 µg/kg BW) and were sacrificed 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h later. Total RNA was isolated from the pooled uterine samples, fractionated on a denaturing gel (15 µg/lane), transferred to a membrane, and hybridized against specific cDNA probes. Membranes were also probed with c-fos, an estrogen-inducible gene used as a positive control in this study, and 1-A, a constitutively expressed gene in the rat uterus, to show sample loading

To study the effects of estradiol on coactivator mRNAs in vivo, ovariectomized female rats received a single s.c. injection of estradiol and were sacrificed 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after treatment. Expression c-fos mRNA was used as a positive control in these experiments. No constitutive c-fos expression was detected in untreated uteri, and estradiol treatment increased c-fos expression by 3 h after hormone administration (Fig. 1). The constitutive mRNA levels of SPA, SRC-1, GRIP1, RIP140, RAC3, and p300 in the uterus remained unchanged after estradiol treatment of either ovariectomized mature or immature rats (Fig. 1). Based on normalization of the signal to the rat 1-A expression and densitometric evaluation, constitutive expression of these genes appears to be insensitive to estradiol in the rat uterus (data not shown). Constitutive levels of SRC-1, SPA, RAC3, RIP140, GRIP1, and p300 in the uterus were also insensitive to progesterone treatment of ovariectomized immature and mature rats (data not shown). Insensitivity of constitutive coactivator expression to estradiol has been recently reported in human endometrial cancer cells [24] as well as in the rat hypothalamus and pineal gland [23]. However, coactivator expression is estrogen-inducible in human breast cancer cells [24], and estradiol down-regulates coactivator expression in the rat pituitary gland [23]. Interestingly, in that latter study [23], p300 mRNA levels in the pituitary were not altered by estradiol, further suggesting a differential regulation of different coactivators within the same cell type. Transcriptional activation by steroid/thyroid hormone receptors may also involve the displacement of corepressors such as SMRT, which are proteins that associate with unliganded nuclear receptors and repress receptor activity [4245]. We could detect only very low levels of constitutive SMRT mRNA expression in the uterus by Northern blot analysis, and SMRT expression was unchanged after estradiol administration (unpublished observations). Constitutive SMRT mRNA levels have been reported in endometrial human cancer cell lines [24], and SMRT expression has been increased by estradiol in male rat pituitary, but not in hypothalamus and pineal, glands [23].

We observed a high constitutive level of SPA mRNA expression in the uterus. That SPA is a ribosomal protein might contribute to its high level of expression, but SPA protein has been detected in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of human cell lines [33]. To our knowledge, no known nuclear function of SPA has been reported [22, 33], but SPA has been reported to enhance the agonist activity of tamoxifen-occupied ER [22]. However, SPA has no effect on transcription by ER when liganded by estradiol [22]. Thus, why this antagonistic-specific transcriptional coactivator is so highly expressed in the rat uterus is curious. We investigated if constitutive expression of SPA and other coactivators was sensitive to tamoxifen. Adult and immature ovariectomized female rats received a single s.c. injection of tamoxifen and were killed 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h after treatment. Levels of SPA, SRC-1, p300, RIP140, and GRIP1 mRNA in the uterus remained unchanged after tamoxifen treatment of adult rats (Fig. 2). Densitometric evaluation after normalization of the signal to the rat 1-A expression showed no difference in constitutive coactivator expression, suggesting that these genes are insensitive to tamoxifen. This contrasts with the effects of tamoxifen on the level of ER{alpha} mRNA, which was dramatically reduced by 12–24 h (Fig. 2).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of tamoxifen on coactivator and ER{alpha} mRNA expression in the uterus. Total RNA (15 µg/lane) was isolated from pooled uterine samples after administration of tamoxifen (1 mg/kg BW) to ovariectomized adult rats. Northern blot analysis was performed using cDNA probes specific for SPA, SRC-1, RAC3, RIP140, GRIP1, or p300 (A) and ER{alpha} (B). The amount of ER{alpha} mRNA is presented relative to the amount of 1-A expression in the histogram. Bar = the average of the relative signal density of the duplicate samples for each group

The uterus is a complex tissue comprised of several distinct compartments. Our studies using Northern blot analysis of whole uterine homogenates provided information regarding coactivator expression, but they did not provide information on the localization of mRNAs within the uterus. In situ hybridization was used to examine the expression of mRNAs encoding SPA, SRC-1, GRIP1, RIP140, and p300 genes in the uterine compartments. In addition, because distinct differences exist in the proliferative response of the endometrium to estradiol as animals mature, the expression pattern of coactivator mRNAs was studied in both the adult and the immature rat uterus. Only low background levels of sense RNA binding to uterine sections were detected for the coactivator probes (D, H, L, and P in Figs. 3, 4, and 5, C and F). When antisense SPA, SRC-1, GRIP1, RIP140, and p300 probes were used on uterine sections from untreated, ovariectomized mature and immature rats, silver grains were observed in all uterine compartments (columns 1–3 in Figs. 3 and 4 and columns 1 and 2 in Fig. 5). No cell type-specific pattern of coactivator expression was apparent; however, hybridization signals were more intense in the luminal and glandular epithelia compared with the stroma and myometrium, suggesting that specific ER coactivators in the uterine epithelia may contribute to the estrogen sensitivity of this uterine compartment. No sizeable induction of coactivator gene expression was observed after estradiol administration (columns 2 and 3 in Figs. 3 and 4 and column 2 in Fig. 5), which supports our results using Northern blot analysis. The difference between constitutive SPA expression in the epithelia was more distinct than that in the surrounding stroma and myometrium in the adult and juvenile rat uterus (Figs. 3, A–C, and 4, A–C). In situ hybridization studies repeatedly revealed subtle differences in the expression of some uterine coactivators after estradiol treatment. For example, the pattern of SRC-1 expression was more distinct at 6 h after estradiol treatment compared with that at 0 h in the adult rat uterus (Fig. 3, E and F), and GRIP1 expression in the luminal epithelium of the juvenile uterus appeared to be more distinct after estradiol treatment (Fig. 4, I and J). Expression of p300 also appeared to be more distinct in the uterine epithelia after administration of estradiol (Fig. 5, A, B, D, and E). Silver grains corresponding to coactivator mRNAs appeared to be more evenly distributed by 24 h after estradiol treatment compared with earlier time-points or with untreated rats (Figs. 3, D–P, and 4, D–P). At present, we are uncertain if these subtle changes after hormonal treatment represent an induction of uterine epithelial coactivators, perhaps in selected cells, or repression of stromal coactivator mRNA. We will pursue these studies with more sensitive techniques, including separation of various cell types and application of real-time polymerase chain reaction to more accurately monitor coactivator mRNA changes. We believe these studies will be important, because subtle changes in coactivator expression may serve as powerful signals for selective gene expression in various uterine compartments.



View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Expression patterns of nuclear receptor coactivator mRNAs in adult rat uterus. Uterine sections from mature rats at 0, 6, and 24 h after estradiol-17ß treatment (40 µg/kg BW s.c.) were subjected to in situ hybridization using antisense (columns 1–3) or sense (column 4) RNA probes for SPA (AD), SRC-1 (EH), GRIP1 (IL), or RIP140 (MP). Silver grains representing coactivator mRNAs can be seen in all uterine tissue compartments. Expression in the epithelial cells of the lumen and glands (arrowheads) is also indicated



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Expression pattern of p300 in mature (top row) and immature (bottom row) rat uterus before and after estradiol-17ß treatment (40 µg/kg BW s.c.). Uterine sections from mature rats at 0 h (A and C) and 6 h (B) and from immature rats at 0 h (D and F) and 3 h (E) were subjected to in situ hybridization using antisense (A, B, D, and E) or sense (C and F) p300 RNA probes. Silver grains representing coactivator mRNAs can be seen in all uterine tissue compartments. Expression in the epithelial cells of the lumen and glands (arrowheads) appears to be more distinct than in the surrounding stroma and myometrium



View larger version (131K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Expression pattern of SPA (AD), SRC-1 (EH), GRIP1 (IL), and RIP140 (MP) mRNAs in juvenile rat uterus. Uterine sections from immature rats at 0, 6, and 24 h after estradiol-17ß treatment (40 µg/kg BW s.c.) were subjected to in situ hybridization using antisense (columns 1–3) or sense (column 4) RNA probes. Silver grains representing coactivator mRNAs can be seen in all uterine tissue compartments. Expression in the epithelial cells of the lumen and glands (arrowheads) is also indicated

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank Betsy Osborne and Douglas Nam for help with figure preparation.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 24 July 1999.

1 Supported by NIH grant CA74748 and the Bert Elwert Research Award to K.P.N. S.M.H. is supported by NIH grant HD-08615. R.M.B. is supported by U.S. Department of Defense grant DAMD 17-98-1-8011. Back

2 Correspondence: Kenneth P. Nephew, Medical Sciences, Indiana University, School of Medicine, Jordan Hall, 1001 E. 3rd St., Bloomington, IN 47405-4401. FAX: 812 855 4436; knephew{at}indiana.edu Back

Accepted: March 8, 2000.

Received: June 4, 1999.

REFERENCES

  1. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schutz G, Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P, Evans RM. The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade. Cell 1995; 83:835–839.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Burch JB, Evans MI, Friedman TM, O'Malley PJ. Two functional estrogen response elements are located upstream of the major chicken vitellogenin gene. Mol Cell Biol 1988; 8:1123–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Sequence and characterization of a co-activator for the steroid hormone receptor superfamily. Science 1995; 270:1354–1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hong H, Kohli K, Trivedi A, Johnson DL, Stallcup MR. GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional co-activator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:4948–4952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Voegel JJ, Heine MJ, Zechel C, Chambon P, Gronemeyer H. TIF2, a 160 kDa transcriptional mediator for the ligand-dependent activation function AF-2 of nuclear receptors. EMBO J 1996; 15:3667–3675.[Medline]
  6. Kamei Y, Xu L, Heinzel T, Torchia J, Kurokawa R, Gloss B, Lin SC, Heyman RA, Rose DW, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. A CBP integrator complex mediates transcriptional activation and AP-1 inhibition by nuclear receptors. Cell 1996; 85:403–414.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Spencer TE, Jenster G, Burcin MM, Allis CD, Zhou J, Mizzen CA, McKenna NJ, Onate SA, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Steroid receptor co-activator-1 is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 1997; 389:194–198.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Li H, Gomes PJ, Chen JD. RAC3, a steroid/nuclear receptor-associated co-activator that is related to SRC-1 and TIF2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94:8479–8484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Anzick SL, Kononen J, Walker RL, Azorsa DO, Tanner MM, Guan XY, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP, Trent JM, Meltzer PS. AIB1, a steroid receptor co-activator amplified in breast and ovarian cancer. Science 1997; 277:965–968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Chen H, Lin RJ, Schiltz RL, Chakravarti D, Nash A, Nagy L, Privalsky ML, Nakatani Y, Evans RM. Nuclear receptor co-activator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300. Cell 1997; 90:569–580.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Takeshita A, Cardona GR, Koibuchi N, Suen CS, Chin WW. TRAM-1, a novel 160-kDa thyroid hormone receptor activator molecule exhibits distinct properties from steroid receptor co-activator-1. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:27629–27634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Torchia J, Rose DW, Inostroza J, Kamei Y, Westin S, Glass CK, Rosenfeld MG. The transcriptional co-activator p/CIP binds CBP and mediates nuclear-receptor function. Nature 1997; 387:677–684.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Cavailles V, Dauvois S, Danielian PS, Parker MG. Interaction of proteins with transcriptionally active estrogen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:10009–10013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Cavailles V, Dauvois S, L'Horset F, Lopez G, Hoare S, Kushner PJ, Parker MG. Nuclear factor RIP140 modulates transcriptional activation by the estrogen receptor. EMBO J 1995; 14:3741–3751.[Medline]
  15. Halachmi S, Marden E, Martin G, MacKay H, Abbondanza C, Brown M. Estrogen receptor-associated proteins: possible mediators of hormone-induced transcription. Science 1994; 264:1455–1458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T. The CBP co-activator is a histone acetyltransferase. Nature 1996; 384:641–643.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Ogryzko VV, Schiltz RL, Russanova V, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. The transcriptional co-activators p300 and CBP are histone acetyltransferases. Cell 1996; 87:953–959.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Chakravarti D, LaMorte VJ, Nelson MC, Nakajima T, Schulman IG, Juguilon H, Montminy M, Evans RM. Role of CBP/P300 in nuclear receptor signaling. Nature 1996; 383:99–103.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Smith CL, Onate SA, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. CREB binding protein acts synergistically with steroid receptor co-activator-1 to enhance steroid receptor-dependent transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:8884–8888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Yao TP, Ku G, Zhou N, Scully R, Livingston DM. The nuclear hormone receptor co-activator SRC-1 is a specific target of p300. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:10626–10631.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yang XJ, Ogryzko VV, Nishikawa J, Howard BH, Nakatani Y. A p300/CBP-associated factor that competes with the adenoviral oncoprotein E1A. Nature 1996; 382:319–324.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Jackson TA, Richer JK, Bain DL, Takimoto GS, Tung L, Horwitz KB. The partial agonist activity of antagonist-occupied steroid receptors is controlled by a novel hinge domain-binding co-activator L7/SPA and the co-repressors N-CoR or SMRT. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:693–705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Misiti S, Schomburg L, Yen PM, Chin WW. Expression and hormonal regulation of co-activator and corepressor genes. Endocrinology 1998; 139:2493–2500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Thenot S, Charpin M, Bonnet S, Cavailles V. Estrogen receptor cofactors expression in breast and endometrial human cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999; 156:85–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kelloff GJ, Crowell JA, Boone CA, Steele VA, Lubet RA, Greenwald P, Alberts DS, Covey JM, Doody LA, Knapp GG, Nayfield S, Parkinson DR, Prasad VK, Prorok PC, Sausville EA, Sigman CC. Clinical development plan: tamoxifen. J Cell Biochem 1994; 20(suppl):252–267.
  26. Nayfield SG, Karp JE, Ford LG, Dorr A, Kramer BS. Potential role of tamoxifen in prevention of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83:1450–1459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Redmond CK, Kavanah M, Cronin WM, Vogel V, Robidoux A, Dimitrov N, Atkins J, Daly M, Wieand S, Tan-Chiu E, Ford L, Wolmark N. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:1371–1388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Katzenellenbogen BS, Bhakoo HS, Ferguson ER, Lan NC, Tatee T, Tsai TS, Katzenellenbogen JA. Estrogen and antiestrogen action in reproductive tissues and tumors. Recent Prog Horm Res 1979; 35:259–300.
  29. Jordan VC, Dix CJ. Effect of estradiol benzoate, tamoxifen and monohydrotamoxifen on immature rat uterine progesterone receptor synthesis and endometrial cell division. J Steroid Biochem 1979; 11:285–291.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Mukku VR, Kirkland JL, Hardy M, Stancel GM. Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of estrogen and antiestrogen on uterine cell division. Endocrinology 1981; 109:1005–1010.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Smith CL, Nawaz Z, O'Malley BW. Co-activator and corepressor regulation of the agonist/antagonist activity of the mixed antiestrogen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:657–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Webb P, Nguyen P, Shinsako J, Anderson C, Feng W, Nguyen MP, Chen D, Huang SM, Subramanian S, McKinerney E, Katzenellenbogen BS, Stallcup MR, Kushner PJ. Estrogen receptor activation function 1 works by binding p160 co-activator proteins. Mol Endocrinol 1998; 12:1605–1618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Von Mikecz A, Hemmerich P, Peter HH, Krawinkel U. Characterization of eukaryotic protein L7 as a novel autoantigen which frequently elicits an immune response in patients suffering from systemic autoimmune disease. Immunobiology 1994; 192:137–154.[Medline]
  34. Bigsby RM, Young CM. Estrogenic effects of the antiprogestin onapristone (ZK98.299) in the rodent uterus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 171:188–194.
  35. Nephew KP, Polek TC, Akcali KC, Khan SA. The antiestrogen tamoxifen induces c-fos and jun-B but not c-jun or jun-D protooncogenes in the rat uterus. Endocrinology 1993; 133:419–422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Nephew KP, Peters GA, Khan SA. Cellular localization of estradiol-induced c-fos mRNA in the rat uterus: c-fos expression and uterine cell proliferation do not correlate strictly. Endocrinology 1996; 136:3007–3015.[Abstract]
  37. Parczyk K, Madjno R, Michna H, Nishino Y, Schneider MR. Progesterone receptor repression by estrogens in rat uterine epithelial cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1997; 63:309–316.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Nephew KP, Polek TC, Khan SA. Tamoxifen-induced proto-oncogene expression persists in uterine endometrial epithelium. Endocrinology 1996; 137:219–224.[Abstract]
  39. Nephew KP, Tang M, Khan SA. Estrogen differentially affects c-jun expression in uterine tissue compartments. Endocrinology 1994; 134:1827–1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Hsu CY, Komm BS, Lyttle CR, Frankel F. Cloning of estrogen-regulated messenger ribonucleic acids from rat uterus. Endocrinology 1988; 22:631–639.
  41. Xu J, Qiu Y, DeMayo FJ, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Partial hormone resistance in mice with disruption of the steroid receptor co-activator-1 (SRC-1) gene. Science 1998; 279:1922–1925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Horwitz KB, Jackson TA, Bain DL, Richer JK, Takimoto GS, Tung L. Nuclear receptor co-activators and co-repressors. Mol Endocrinol 1996; 10:1167–1177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Shibata H, Spencer TE, Onate SA, Jenster G, Tsai SY, Tsai MJ, O'Malley BW. Role of co-activators and co-repressors in the mechanism of steroid/thyroid receptor action. Recent Prog Horm Res 1997; 52:141–164.
  44. Jenster G. Co-activators and co-repressors as mediators of nuclear receptor function: an update. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998; 143:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Chen JD, Evans RM. A transcriptional co-repressor that interacts with nuclear hormone receptors. Nature 1995; 377:454–457.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
T. J. Nakamura, M. T. Sellix, M. Menaker, and G. D. Block
Estrogen directly modulates circadian rhythms of PER2 expression in the uterus
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2008; 295(5): E1025 - E1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Mukherjee, S. M. Soyal, R. Fernandez-Valdivia, M. Gehin, P. Chambon, F. J. DeMayo, J. P. Lydon, and B. W. O'Malley
Steroid Receptor Coactivator 2 Is Critical for Progesterone-Dependent Uterine Function and Mammary Morphogenesis in the Mouse.
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6571 - 6583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
Y. C. Lim, L. Li, Z. Desta, Q. Zhao, J. M. Rae, D. A. Flockhart, and T. C. Skaar
Endoxifen, a Secondary Metabolite of Tamoxifen, and 4-OH-Tamoxifen Induce Similar Changes in Global Gene Expression Patterns in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2006; 318(2): 503 - 512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S. N Kelly, T J. McKenna, and L. S Young
Coregulatory protein-orphan nuclear receptor interactions in the human adrenal cortex
J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2005; 186(1): 33 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Durrer, K. Maerkel, M. Schlumpf, and W. Lichtensteiger
Estrogen Target Gene Regulation and Coactivator Expression in Rat Uterus after Developmental Exposure to the Ultraviolet Filter 4-Methylbenzylidene Camphor
Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2130 - 2139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G.-S. Lee, K.-C. Choi, H.-J. Kim, and E.-B. Jeung
Effect of Genistein As a Selective Estrogen Receptor Beta Agonist on the Expression of Calbindin-D9k in the Uterus of Immature Rats
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2004; 82(2): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
C. L. Smith and B. W. O'Malley
Coregulator Function: A Key to Understanding Tissue Specificity of Selective Receptor Modulators
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 45 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. A. Molenda, C. P. Kilts, R. L. Allen, and M. J. Tetel
Nuclear Receptor Coactivator Function in Reproductive Physiology and Behavior
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1449 - 1457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
W. Jalabi, M. Cerghet, R. P. Skoff, and M. S. Ghandour
Detection of Oligodendrocytes in Tissue Sections Using PCR Synthesis of Digoxigenin-labeled Probes
J. Histochem. Cytochem., July 1, 2003; 51(7): 913 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B. J. Tarleton, T. D. Braden, A. A. Wiley, and F. F. Bartol
Estrogen-Induced Disruption of Neonatal Porcine Uterine Development Alters Adult Uterine Function
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2003; 68(4): 1387 - 1393.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
F. Wieser, C. Schneeberger, G. Hudelist, C. Singer, C. Kurz, F. Nagele, C. Gruber, J.C. Huber, and W. Tschugguel
Endometrial nuclear receptor co-factors SRC-1 and N-CoR are increased in human endometrium during menstruation
Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 8(7): 644 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Fan, X. Long, J. A. Bailey, C. A. Reed, E. Osborne, E. A. Gize, E. A. Kirk, R. M. Bigsby, and K. P. Nephew
The Activating Enzyme of NEDD8 Inhibits Steroid Receptor Function
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2002; 16(2): 315 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Leonardsson, M. A. Jacobs, R. White, R. Jeffery, R. Poulsom, S. Milligan, and M. Parker
Embryo Transfer Experiments and Ovarian Transplantation Identify the Ovary as the Only Site in Which Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1/RIP140 Action Is Crucial for Female Fertility
Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 700 - 707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bigsby, R. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS