Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 826-832 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Characterization and Distribution of Gonadotrophs in the Pars Distalis and Pars Tuberalis of the Equine Pituitary Gland During the Estrous Cycle and Seasonal Anestrus

Rebecca C. Eaglea, and Domingo J. Tortonese1,a

a Department of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Bristol BS2 8EJ, England, United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the neuroendocrine control of fertility in the horse. In this species, unusual features characterize the normal estrous cycle such as a prolonged preovulatory LH surge during the follicular phase and a distinctive FSH surge during the midluteal phase. This study investigated the distribution and hormonal identity of gonadotrophs in the pars distalis (PD) and pars tuberalis (PT) of the equine pituitary gland as possible morphological bases for the referred unusual endocrine characteristics. In addition, the proportion of gonadotrophs in relation to other pituitary cell types during both the estrous cycle and anestrus were investigated. Pituitary glands were collected from sexually active (n = 5) and seasonally anestrous (n = 5) mares in November, and single or double immunofluorescent staining was carried out on 6-µm sections using monoclonal antibodies to the LHß or FSHß subunits and a polyclonal antibody to ovine LHß. Gonadotrophs were densely distributed around the pars intermedia in the PD and in the caudal ventral region of the PT. In addition to isolated cells, clusters of gonadotrophs were found surrounding the capillaries. No significant differences were detected in the number of gonadotrophs between sexually active and anestrous mares in either the PD or PT. In the PD, gonadotrophs represented 22.7 ± 5.8% and 19.1 ± 2.1% of the total cell density in sexually active and anestrous animals, respectively (P > 0.05). However, in the PT, gonadotrophs accounted for a higher proportion of the total cell population in sexually active (6 ± 0.1%) than in anestrous (1.2 ± 0.05%) mares (P < 0.02). Double immunofluorescence revealed that the majority of gonadotrophs were bihormonal (i.e., positive for LH and FSH); however, in the sexually active mare, a larger proportion of gonadotrophs (22.5 ± 3.6%) were monohormonal for either LH or FSH, when compared to anestrous animals (9.7 ± 1.2%; P < 0.02). Based on these findings we conclude that: 1) although the relative distribution of gonadotrophs is similar to those reported for other species, a significantly larger proportion of gonadotroph cells is present in the equine pituitary gland; 2) gonadotroph density does not appear to differ between sexually active and anestrous mares in the PD; 3) a larger proportion of gonadotrophs is apparent in the PT of sexually active animals; and 4) although a large incidence of bihormonal gonadotrophs is present in the horse, specific LH or FSH cells differentiate predominantly during the sexually active phase.

FSH, LH, seasonal reproduction

INTRODUCTION

The process of reproduction in mammals is governed by the central nervous system; information from internal (e.g., metabolic) and external (e.g., photoperiodic) cues converges in the hypothalamus, which, through the release of a single hypothalamic hormone (GnRH), regulates the synthesis and secretion of the two gonadotropins LH and FSH from gonadotroph cells in the pituitary gland [1, 2]. Secretion of GnRH is intermittent, resulting in reciprocal pulsatile gonadotropin release [3]. In the horse, however, continuous infusion of synthetic GnRH successfully stimulated continuous gonadotropin release [4]. This is apparently unique to the equine and may reflect an intrinsic difference in the hypothalamic-pituitary intercommunication, because most species require pulsatile GnRH delivery for successful gonadotropin release, otherwise desensitization occurs [4]. Preferential release of one or the other of the gonadotropins (i.e., LH/FSH) is mediated by the interplay of GnRH and gonadal secretory products [1, 5] and is accompanied by changes in the cells secreting them [6]; therefore, it has been proposed that cell composition in the pituitary should vary depending on stage of the reproductive cycle [7].

Mares are seasonally polyestrous and, like some rodents (e.g., hamsters), breed during long days. Gonadotropic patterns associated with the estrous cycle of the mare are considerably different from other species. In general, these hormones have individually distinctive profiles, with high concentrations of FSH during the luteal phase and high concentrations of LH during the follicular phase of the estrous cycle [8]. The horse, however, is a species where a marked FSH surge occurs in the midluteal phase without a simultaneous LH rise [9, 10]. It is only during the ovulatory period that concentrations of both gonadotropins increase significantly [9, 10], culminating in the gonadotropin surge that induces ovulation. In the horse, the LH surge is prolonged, beginning a few days before ovulation and continuing for several days after [1113], contrasting sharply to the sheep that exhibits a short-lived gonadotropin surge lasting 12–24 h [14]. Although a possible explanation for this is that equine LH has a longer half-life than most species [12], morphological differences in the gonadotrophs, i.e., cell number and composition, may be of equal importance for the occurrence of the prolonged surge of gonadotropins. The estrous cycle is normally, although not always [15], interrupted during the winter months as the mare enters anestrus. If an animal is to become sexually inactive, at this time GnRH secretion is reduced dramatically and the pituitary fails to release significant amounts of FSH or LH [16]. Pituitary content of LH decreases, but FSH content does not change [16]. There is an important reduction in gonadal steroid and protein hormone secretions and lack of ovulation. Re-establishment of GnRH secretion is among the first events in the transition from anestrus to the breeding season [17] which primarily leads to an increase in FSH secretion. This GnRH increase does not result in increased secretion of LH at an early stage due to the reduced pituitary LH stores brought about in anestrus. As in other species, an increase in estrogen, prior to the LH surge that induces first ovulation, is likely to provide some stimulus within the pituitary for the synthesis and/or secretion of LH, forming part of the last chain of events of the transition to the sexually active phase [17].

An integration of the individual functions of the components of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is thus essential for reproductive success. Specifically for the pituitary gland, the present understanding of its function is based on experimental work conducted primarily in the rat, sheep, and monkey. Little is known, however, about the morphological and physiological characteristics of the equine pituitary. Features specific to the equine may be responsible for the aforementioned unusual endocrine characteristics of the mare's reproductive cycle. To provide initial information on the morphological basis for the differential regulation of gonadotropin secretion, and thus on the intrapituitary regulation of fertility, this study was undertaken to 1) investigate the relative distributions of gonadotrophs in the pars distalis (PD) and pars tuberalis (PT) of the equine pituitary gland, 2) determine whether the proportion of gonadotrophs in these two regions of the pituitary differ between sexually active and anestrous mares within the same season, and 3) determine whether gonadotophs are monohormonal (specific for either LH or FSH) or bihormonal (secrete both gonadotropins), and whether hormonal specificity is affected by stage of the seasonal reproductive cycle. Preliminary results from these studies have been published in abstract form [18].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pituitary glands from 10 mares, 5 sexually active and 5 seasonally anestrous, were collected from an abattoir immediately after death during November. Tissue collection was carried out within the same season (late autumn) in order to differentiate possible effects of reproductive stage from those of season on the pituitary cytological configuration. Gross examination of the ovaries was used to estimate cycle stage. A mare was considered to be sexually active if a recent corpus luteum and a large follicle (>=2 cm) were present upon careful dissection of the gonads. In contrast, animals were said to be in anestrus when only a corpus albicans, small follicles, and no corpora lutea were present in the gonads. The pituitary glands were fixed in Bouin's for up to 46 h before immersion in 70% ethanol and then cut either transversally or sagittally. The tissues were then dehydrated in graduated alcohol and embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections (6 µm) were cut, mounted onto VECTA-coated slides, and dried overnight at 37°C. Experiments were then carried out using the following three specific antibodies: 1) bovine LHß monoclonal antibody (Mab; 518 B7—a gift from Dr. J.F. Roser, University of California, Davis); 2) ovine FSHß Mab (a gift from Dr. K. Henderson, AgResearch, Wallaceville, New Zealand); 3) ovine LHß polyclonal antibody (Pab), raised in rabbit (ASMcN R23—a gift from Prof. A.S. McNeilly, MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, Edinburgh, UK).

Each antibody was first tested through single immunofluorescent staining, to check whether it would cross-react in the horse and to determine its optimal working dilution. Tissue sections were processed following a method previously described [19]. Briefly, sections were dewaxed and rehydrated by sequential immersion in xylene and graduated alcohol and then washed in 0.05 M Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4). Nonspecific binding sites were blocked using normal goat serum (for Mabs) or normal donkey serum (for Pab) for 1 h at room temperature (1:5 dilution in TBS). Sections were then incubated for 24 h at 4°C in a humidity chamber, with specific primary antibodies of varying dilutions (ranging from 1:50 to 1:5000). Subsequently, sections were washed in 0.01 M PBS containing 0.1% BSA (pH 7.6) and then incubated at room temperature for 1 h in secondary antibodies, i.e., goat anti-mouse serum conjugated to rhodamine (for Mabs; Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, Dorset, UK) and donkey anti-rabbit serum conjugated to fluorescein (for Pab; SAPU, Carluke, Lanarkshire, UK). Both antibodies were used at 1:20 dilutions in PBS. Finally, sections were rinsed in PBS and the coverslips mounted with Vectashield for Fluorescence (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK). For control sections, primary antibodies were either omitted or replaced with normal mouse or rabbit serum.

Experiment 1

Counterstaining enabled the determination of the relative distribution and proportion of gonadotrophs in relation to other cell types in the equine pituitary. Pituitary sections were immunoreacted with LHß Mab and counterstained with hematoxylin using the following method. Sections were dewaxed and rehydrated, then washed in hydrogen peroxide (4 parts 3% H2O2:1 part methanol) for 20 min before blocking with normal rabbit serum (1:5 dilution with TBS) overnight in a humidity chamber at 4°C. The primary antibody (LHß Mab, 1:5000) was then applied for 2 h in a humidity chamber at room temperature. After rinsing in PBS/BSA for 15 min, sections were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulin (1:200 dilution in 0.01 M PBS/1% BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. This was followed by exposure to diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride for up to 10 min, to visualize immunoreactivity. Counterstaining with hematoxylin provided the neutral staining of the other pituitary cell types. Sections were then washed in graduated alcohol and xylene and the coverslips mounted with DePeX before visualization under the light microscope.

Experiment 2

Double immunofluorescent staining provided the means to determine the hormonal specificity of gonadotrophs. The FSHß Mab was used in combination with the LHß Pab. The method was similar to that for single staining except when applying normal blocking sera and antibodies. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked using a combination of normal goat and donkey sera (1 part goat serum:1 part donkey serum:3 parts TBS). For application of the primary antibodies, sections were first incubated with FSHß Mab (1:100) for 20 min at room temperature, before adding LHß Pab (1:200); exposure to these primary antibodies was for 24 h at 4°C. After rinsing in PBS (2 x 5 min), secondary antibodies were applied sequentially: sections were exposed to rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse serum for 1 h at room temperature (in the dark), washed in PBS (4 x 5 min), and then incubated for a further hour at room temperature with fluorescein-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit serum, before final rinsing (4 x 5 min) in PBS. As for single staining, 1:20 dilutions of the two secondary antibodies were used.

Quantitative and Statistical Analyses

Gonadotrophs, and all remaining pituitary cell types, were counted in 0.01-mm2 fields; in each counterstained section, five fields for the PD and two fields for the PT were randomly selected. Three sections, at least 500 µm apart, were analyzed from each animal and the average cell density per field for each mare calculated. Group means (for sexually active and anestrous mares) were then obtained, by combining the results of individual animals and expressed as means ± SEM. The percentage of gonadotrophs was then calculated, expressing the average density of gonadotrophs as a percentage of the average total cell density; results were expressed as the mean ± SEM percentage of the group. In addition, the relative proportions of monohormonal and bihormonal gonadotrophs were calculated. Cells positive for either LH or FSH were discriminated by their fluorescence at two wavelengths of UV light, when examined under the microscope. Double exposure photographs were taken of random fields in eight different pituitary sections (four sexually active, four seasonally anestrus). As each photo had been produced from exposure to the two different wavelengths, the resulting projection showed all gonadotrophs, the hormone identity of which could be determined by their color. The total numbers of LH- and FSH-monohormonal cells were counted from each photo and expressed as a percentage of the total number of gonadotrophs in that photo. Final results were calculated as percent mean ± SEM of the group.

The effects of reproductive state on the number and proportion of gonadotrophs in the equine pituitary gland and on the percentage of monohormonal cells were examined by ANOVA, using the StatView computer program. Significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

All antibodies used were found to cross-react in the horse. For immunofluorescent staining, the LH monoclonal antibody positively reacted at all dilutions tested. In comparison, the polyclonal LH antibody only reacted at higher concentrations. The following concentrations were used in subsequent experiments: LHß Mab: 1:1000 dilution; FSHß Mab: 1:100 dilution; LHß Pab: 1:200 dilution. For nonimmunofluorescent staining, the 1:1000 dilution of LHß Mab gave an extremely high background and therefore dilutions of 1:1500, 1:2000, 1:4000, and 1:5000 were sequentially tested; it was evident that the 1:5000 dilution provided the best results. No staining was detected in control sections, where the first antibody was omitted or replaced by normal mouse or rabbit serum, during any of the immunofluorescent or nonimmunofluorescent runs (Fig. 3, L and P).



View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 3. Double immunofluorescent staining for LHß (A and E) and FSHß (B and F) in the equine pituitary PD of sexually active (A through D) and seasonally anestrous (E through H) mares. Double immunofluorescent staining for LHß (I and M) and FSHß (J and N) in the equine pituitary pars tuberalis of sexually active (I through K) and seasonally anestrous (M through O) mares. The superimposed images of LH and FSH staining (C, G, K, and O) allowed the identification of monohormonal and bihormonal cells, where LH gonadotrophs appear green (arrow in C), FSH gonadotrophs appear red (arrow in C), and bihormonal gonadotrophs appear yellow. Note: 1) The existence of both LH monohormonal and FSH monohormonal gonadotrophs (arrows in A and B), 2) that larger gonadotrophs and a greater proportion of monohormonal cells are present in the sexually active mare compared to the anestrous mare (D and H), and 3) the morphological heterogeneity of gonadotrophs in terms of cell shape and size (D and H). No staining was observed in control sections where first antibodies were omitted or replaced by normal mouse or rabbit serum (L and P). Magnification x400 for A through H, and x200 for I through P.

Experiment 1

Distribution of gonadotrophs in the equine pituitary gland The different regions of the equine pituitary gland are shown in Figure 1A. Gonadotrophs were found throughout the PD and PT, with no specific immunoreactive LH staining in the pars nervosa (Fig. 1B). In the PD, denser populations of gonadotrophs were observed surrounding the pars intermedia and the portal vessels (Fig. 1C), while in the PT, large numbers of gonadotrophs were found in the caudal ventral region (Fig. 1D). The rostral and dorsal regions of the PT had a reduced population of gonadotrophs.



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 1. A) Sagittal section of the equine pituitary gland; note that the PT completely surrounds the median eminence. B) Sagittal section of an equine pituitary gland showing the boundaries between the pars nervosa (PN), pars intermedia (PI), and PD; note the absence of staining in the PN, with a small amount in the PI. Magnification x100. C) Specific distribution of gonadotrophs in the PD of the equine pituitary; note the arrangement of cells around the portal vessels (pv) and of circular clusters of gonadotrophs. D) Caudal ventral region of the PT; denser populations of gonadotrophs were found in this region, as the PT merges with the PD. Magnification x100.

Number and proportion of gonadotrophs, in relation to other cell types, in the PD and PT of the equine pituitary gland No significant differences were seen in the number or proportion of gonadotrophs in the PD of sexually active compared to anestrous animals, with gonadotrophs representing 22.7 ± 5.8% and 19.1 ± 2.1% of the total pituitary cell population, respectively (Fig. 2). In contrast, there was a tendency for a greater gonadotroph number in the PT of sexually active compared to anestrous mares, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.1). However, the proportion of gonadotrophs in the PT differed between the two stages of the reproductive cycle, with a significantly higher (P < 0.02) incidence of gonadotroph cells in cyclic mares. In this region, gonadotrophs accounted for 6 ± 0.1% of the pituitary cell population in sexually active mares compared to 1.2 ± 0.05% in anestrous animals (Fig. 2).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG 2. Proportion of gonadotrophs in relation to all pituitary cell types in the PD and the PT of sexually active and seasonally anestrous mares. Data are expressed as percentage (mean ± SEM) of cells within 0.01-mm2 fields.

Experiment 2

Hormonal specificity of gonadotrophs in the PD and PT of the equine pituitary gland Populations of both bihormonal and specific LH or FSH monohormonal gonadotrophs were found in both the PD (Fig. 3, A through C and Fig. 3, E through G) and the PT (Fig. 3, I through K and Fig. 3, M through O) of sexually active and anestrous mares, although bihormonal (i.e., LH/FSH) cells accounted for the majority of gonadotrophs (Fig. 3, C, G, K, and O). However, the proportion of monohormonal cells detected in sexually active mares (22.5 ± 3.6%; Fig. 3D) was significantly higher (P < 0.02) than that observed for anestrous animals (9.7 ± 1.2%; Fig. 3H). These proportions are evident when simultaneous exposure to double immunofluorescent staining was carried out for the immediate identification of the cell type, with bihormonal gonadotrophs represented by yellow cells, monohormonal LH gonadotrophs by green cells, and monohormonal FSH gonadotrophs by red cells (Fig. 3, D and H).

DISCUSSION

Previous work has shown that the different cell types of the pituitary are not randomly distributed in the species so far studied [20]. The results presented here agree with those findings, with specific arrangements observed supporting reports for the rat [2023], sheep [19, 24, 25], and other large mammals [26]. Specifically, in the PD, although gonadotrophs were found distributed throughout the region, denser populations extended along either side of the pars intermedia and near the infundibulum attachment. Gonadotrophs were also found in the medial region of the PD that is adjacent to the PT. In the PT, gonadotrophs were concentrated in the caudal ventral region with very few cells in the rostral and dorsal regions. Although it was originally suggested that PT cells are similar to those of the PD [22], reports from other species suggest gonadotrophs do not have common properties in these regions. Studies in the rat, for example, indicate that the mode of hormone synthesis and/or release from LH cells of the PT is different from those of the PD [24, 27]. The secreting capacity of these cells appeared to be small and inconsistent, with low GnRH sensitivity [27]. This may imply a less important endocrinological role for the PT in this species. In contrast, in sheep, LH cells are larger and have a higher hormone content in the PT than in the PD [24], suggesting that in this seasonal breeder the rate of hormone synthesis is higher in the PT.

In both the PD and PT of the equine pituitary, gonadotrophs were arranged alongside the portal blood vessels. Such an arrangement implies an important functional relationship to the pituitary blood supply and a control point for hypothalamic regulation. The relationship should be more apparent in the PT, being in closer contact with the nerve endings of the median eminence of the hypothalamus, that are themselves in close contact with the portal vessels [28]. As gonadotrophs were concentrated in the caudal ventral region of the PT where it merges with the PD, this spatial relation suggests that secretory products of the PT may modulate hypothalamic effects on the PD. Moreover, these cells are likely to play an important role in the short-loop feedback regulation of gonadotropins on their own secretion [29]. This mechanism is likely to operate due to the close association of those gonadotrophs with the median eminence. Further interactions between cells may exist because gonadotrophs were found as both isolated and clustered populations, supporting observations in other species [rat: 21, 30; sheep: 24]. A clustered arrangement may provide the means for self-regulation between neighboring gonadotrophs. In contrast, isolated cells may be regulated by other pituitary cell types, as proposed for rodents [31] and sheep [19].

A larger proportion of gonadotrophs (ranging from 13% to 38%) were present in the equine pituitary compared to other species (rat: 14% [32]; sheep: 13% [33]). However, within the PD, there were no significant differences in this study in the average densities of gonadotrophs between sexually active and anestrous animals. In the PT, the mean number of gonadotrophs tended to be higher in sexually active compared to anestrous mares, but the difference in numbers did not reach statistical significance, perhaps as a result of the reduced sample size. However, in the PT the proportion of gonadotrophs in relation to other pituitary cell types was significantly higher in sexually active animals, with the gonadotrophs accounting for 6% of the total cell population compared to 1.2% in anestrous mares. In the sheep, gonadotrophs represented less than 1% in corresponding regions of the PT [25], and no differences in the density of gonadotrophs in relation to season were found in this species [25]. Results of the present study suggest that there may be a change in the gonadotroph cells of the PT in relation to stage of the reproductive cycle, because a marked tendency for a decrease in the number of gonadotrophs was observed in anestrus. Interestingly, the total number of other pituitary cells in the region increased. As a result of these two changes (decreased number of gonadotrophs and increased total number of other cell types), the gonadotrophs represented a significantly smaller proportion of the cell population in anestrus. Because the pituitary glands of both groups of animals in the current study were collected in November, these findings may reflect a direct effect of reproductive state rather than an effect of season. Differences in sensitivity to photoperiodic effects cannot be completely ruled out, however; indeed it has been reported that thyrotroph density may decrease in response to inhibitory photoperiod [34], supporting the idea that the proportions of a specific cell type may be affected by day length. Such changes are likely to be melatonin induced since, in sheep, high-density melatonin-binding sites are concentrated in the PT [35, 36]. With the additional observation of high concentrations of estrogen receptors expressed in the ovine PT [37], this tissue may play an important role in the control of gonadotropin secretion, where the effects of estrogen and melatonin may be integrated to modulate reproduction.

This study has provided conclusive evidence that the equine pituitary contains populations of gonadotrophs that store either LH or FSH (i.e., monohormonal) or both gonadotropins (i.e., bihormonal). Previous studies have shown that gonadotrophs display a similar arrangement in rodents [23, 3840]. Controversy still exists regarding the sheep, where some authors reported a similar situation to that of rodents [24], but others have shown that all gonadotrophs contain both hormones [41]. In the current study, bihormonal and monohormonal cells were distributed throughout the anterior pituitary of the mare; this differs with reports in other species where peripheral cells were shown to secrete one gonadotropin and central cells the other [20, 42]. It is important to note that in both, sexually active and anestrous mares, the majority of gonadotrophs were bihormonal. However, whereas monohormonal cells accounted for 22.5% of the total gonadotroph density in sexually active mares, only 9.7% were detected in anestrous animals. These results suggest a shift from monohormonal gonadotrophs to bihormonal cells during anestrus, although it remains possible that some cells become undetectable due to reduced gonadotropin content at this stage. The decrease in monohormonal cells during this period could explain, at least in part, the reduction in pituitary LH content observed during this period [16]. The cellular functional heterogeneity observed in the current study may represent a morphological basis for the differential release of gonadotropins that occurs during the reproductive cycle and implies that the amount of gonadotropin released will depend on which gonadotrophs are stimulated. The idea of morphologically and functionally distinct subpopulations of gonadotrophs was first suggested by Denef et al. [30, 38, 43] and forms a basis for the selective stimulation of gonadotropin release by a single hypothalamic factor. However, not only could changes in hormone secretion further be brought about by the specific pattern of GnRH release seen in the mare during the reproductive cycle, but biochemical changes in the cell may also contribute [44]. In the rat, GnRH shifts the proportion of cells to mainly bihormonal by enlargement [45]; the large gonadotrophs are stimulated to secrete FSH (but not LH) at low GnRH concentrations, whereas smaller cells only respond at higher GnRH concentrations [43]. The intracellular basis for the different release is unknown. What is generally accepted, however, is that the gonadotropins are stored and secreted from different secretory granules within bihormonal cells [41, 46], which could account for the differential release. The foregoing hypotheses imply that the pituitary itself may be the site for differential release of gonadotropins, and characteristics intrinsic to the gonadotroph cell population should be considered as a basis for the differential response to a single releasing hormone.

In summary, this study has shown that 1) although the relative distribution of gonadotroph cells is similar to that of other species, a larger incidence of gonadotrophs is present in the equine pituitary; 2) in the PD, gonadotroph density does not appear to differ between sexually active and anestrous mares; 3) a larger proportion of gonadotroph cells is apparent in the PT of sexually active animals; and 4) although a large incidence of bihormonal gonadotrophs is found in the horse, specific LH or FSH cells appear to differentiate predominantly during the sexually active phase. This study therefore provides morphological bases for the differential regulation of gonadotropin secretion and for a role of the PT in seasonal breeding, in a species that shows dramatic changes in fertility throughout the annual reproductive cycle.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Dr. J.F. Roser and Quidel Corporation (San Diego, CA) for the gift of LHß Mab; Dr. K.M. Henderson for the FSHß Mab, and Prof. A.S. McNeilly for the LHß Pab. We also thank Christine Goodall for her assistance in immunofluorescent runs and technical support throughout the study, Susan Gregory for her contributions to the art work, and Potters Abattoir (Cappards Farm, Bishop Sutton, Bristol, UK) for providing equine specimens.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 30 November 1999.

1 Correspondence: Domingo J. Tortonese, Dept. of Anatomy, University of Bristol, Southwell St., Bristol BS2 8EJ, England, UK. FAX: 44 117 925 4794. Back

Accepted: April 17, 2000.

Received: October 21, 1999.

REFERENCES

  1. Schally AV, Arimura A, Kastin AJ, Matsuo H, Baba Y, Redding TW, Nair RMG, Debeljuk L, White WF. GnRH: one polypeptide regulates the secretion of LH and FSH. Science 1971; 173:1036–1037.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Evans MJ, Irvine CHG. Measurement of equine follicle stimulating hormone and luteinising hormone: response of anestrous mares to gonadotrophin releasing hormone. Biol Reprod 1976; 15:477–484.[Abstract]
  3. Clarke IJ, Cummins JT. The temporal relationship between GnRH and LH secretion in ovariectomised ewes. Endocrinology 1982; 111:1737–1739.[Medline]
  4. Porter MB, Cleaver BD, Peltier M, Robinson G, Thatcher WW, Sharp DC. Comparative study between pony mares and ewes evaluating gonadotrophic response to administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 110:219–229.[Abstract]
  5. Clarke IJ, Cummins JT, Findlay JK, Burman KJ, Doughton BW. Effects on plasma luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone of varying the frequency and amplitude of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulses in ovariectomized ewes with hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection. Neuroendocrinology 1984; 39:214–221.[Medline]
  6. Holmes RL, Ball JN. The Pituitary Gland. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1974.
  7. Childs GV, Unabia G, Lloyd J. Recruitment and maturation of small subsets of luteinizing hormone gonadotropes during the estrous cycle. Endocrinology 1992; 130:335–344.[Abstract]
  8. Miller KF, Berg SL, Sharp DC, Ginther OJ. FSH and LH in various reproductive states of mares. Biol Reprod 1980; 22:744–750.[Abstract]
  9. Evans MJ, Irvine CHG. Serum concentrations of FSH, LH and progesterone during the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy in the mare. J Reprod Fertil 1975; 23(suppl):193–200.
  10. Alexander SL, Irvine CHG. Secretion rates and short-term patterns of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, FSH and LH throughout the periovulatory period in the mare. J Endocrinol 1987; 114:351–362.[Abstract]
  11. Whitmore HL, Wentworth BC, Ginther OJ. Circulating concentrations of LH during the oestrous cycle of mares as determined by radioimmunoassay. Am J Vet Res 1973; 34:631–636.[Medline]
  12. Geschwind II, Dewey R, Hughes JP, Evans JW, Stabenfeldt GH. Plasma LH levels in the mare during the oestrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1975; 23(suppl):207–212.
  13. Alexander SL, Irvine CHG. Radioimmunoassay and in-vitro bioassay of serum LH throughout the equine estrous cycle. J Reprod Fertil 1982; 32(suppl):253–260.
  14. Goodman RL. Neuroendocrine control of the ovine estrous cycle. In: Knobil E, Neill JD (eds.), The Physiology of Reproduction, 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1994; 2:659–709.
  15. Fitzgerald BP, Davison LA. Comparison of the effects of N-methyl-DL-aspartic acid on gonadotropin and prolactin secretion in anestrous mares and mares exhibiting estrous cycles during anestrus. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:36–42.[Abstract]
  16. Hart PJ, Squires EL, Imel KJ, Nett TM. Seasonal variation in content of GnRH, pituitary receptors for GnRH, and pituitary content of LH and FSH in the mare. Biol Reprod 1984; 30:1055–1062.[Abstract]
  17. Sharp DC. Transition into the breeding season: clues to the mechanisms of seasonality. Equine Vet J 1988; 20:159–161.[Medline]
  18. Eagle RC, Goodall C, Brooks J, McNeilly AS, Tortonese DJ. Characterisation and distribution of gonadotrophs in the pars distalis and pars tuberalis of the equine pituitary gland throughout the seasonal reproductive cycle. J Reprod Fertil Abstr Ser 1998; 21:19.
  19. Tortonese DJ, Brooks J, Ingleton PM, McNeilly AS. Detection of prolactin receptor gene expression in the sheep pituitary gland and visualisation of the specific translation of the signal in gonadotrophs. Endocrinology 1998; 139:5215–5223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Baker BL. Functional cytology of the hypophyseal pars distalis and pars intermedia. In: Knobil E, Sawyer WH (eds.), Handbook of Physiology, sect. 7, vol. 4, pt. 1. The Pituitary Gland and Its Neuroendocrine Control. Washington, DC: American Physiology Society; 1974.
  21. Purves HD, Griesbach WE. The site of thyrotrophin and gonadotrophin production in the rat pituitary. Endocrinology 1951; 49:244–264.
  22. Gross DS. Effect of castration and steroid replacement on immunoreactive LH cells in the pars tuberalis of the rat. Endocrinology 1978; 103:583–588.[Abstract]
  23. Gross DS, Page RB. LH and FSH production in the pars tuberalis of hypophysectomised rats. Am J Anat 1979; 156:285–291.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Gross DS, Turgeon JL, Waring DW. The ovine pars tuberalis: a naturally occurring source of partially purified gonadotrophs which secrete LH in vitro. Endocrinology 1984; 114:2084–2091.[Abstract]
  25. Dawson AB. The relationship of pars tuberalis to pars distalis in the hypophysis of the rhesus monkey. Anat Record 1948; 102:103–122.[CrossRef]
  26. Skinner DC, Robinson JE. The pars tuberalis of the ewe: no effect of season or ovariectomy on the distribution, density or presence of immunoreactive cells. Cell Tissue Res 1996; 284:117–123.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Watanabe YG. A comparative in vitro study on LHRH responsiveness of LH cells of the pars tuberalis and pars distalis. Cell Tissue Res 1986; 245:369–375.[Medline]
  28. Wittkowski WH, Schulze-Bonhage AH, Bockers TM. The pars tuberalis of the hypophysis: a modulator of the pars distalis? Acta Endocrinol 1992; 126:285–290.
  29. Nakazawa K, Marubayashi U, McCann SM. Mediation of the short-loop negative feedback of luteinising hormone (LH) on LH-releasing hormone by melatonin-induced inhibition of LH release from the pars tuberalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991; 88:7576–7579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Denef C, Hautekeete E, Dewals R. Monolayer cultures of gonadotrophs separated by velocity sedimentation: heterogeneity in response to LH-RH. Endocrinology 1978; 103:736–747.[Abstract]
  31. Denef C, Andries M. Evidence for paracrine interaction between gonadotrophs and lactotrophs in pituitary cell aggregates. Endocrinology 1983; 112:813–822.[Abstract]
  32. Fellman D, Bresson JL, Clavequin MC, Bugnon C. Quantitative immunocytochemical studies on the gonadotrophs isolated from the pituitary of the male rat. Cell Tissue Res 1992; 224:137–144.
  33. Thomas GB, McNeilly AS, Brooks AN. Development of gonadotrophs and thyrotrophs in the female foetal sheep pituitary: immunocytochemical localisation studies. J Neuroendocrinol 1993; 5:157–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wittkowski W, Bergmann M, Hoffmann K, Pera F. Photoperiod-dependent changes in TSH-like immunoreactivity of cells in the hypophysial pars tuberalis of the Djungarian hamster. Cell Tissue Res 1988; 251:183–187.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Reviers de MM, Revault JP, Tillet Y, Pelletier J. Melatonin binding sites in the sheep pars tuberalis. Neurosci Lett 1989; 100:89–93.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Morgan PJ, Williams LM, Davidson G, Lawson W, Howell HE. Melatonin receptors in the ovine pars tuberalis: characterisation and autoradiographical localisation. J Neuroendocrinol 1989; 1:1–4.
  37. Skinner DC, Herbison AE, Robinson JE. Immunocytochemical identification of oestrogen receptors in the ovine pars tuberalis: localisation within gonadotrophs. J Neuroendocrinol 1992; 4:659–662.[CrossRef]
  38. Denef C, Hautekeete E, Rubin L. A specific population of gonadotrophs purified from immature female rat pituitary. Science 1976; 194:848–851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lloyd JM, Childs GV. Differential storage and release of LH and FSH from individual gonadotrophs separated by centrifugal elutriation. Endocrinology 1988; 122:1282–1290.[Abstract]
  40. Molter-Gerard C, Fontaine J, Guerin S, Taragnat C. Differential regulation of the gonadotrophin storage pattern by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in the ewe. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1224–1230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Thomas SG, Clarke IJ. The positive feedback effects of oestrogen mobilises LH-containing but not FSH-containing secretory granules in ovine gonadotrophs. Endocrinology 1997; 138:1347–1350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Purves HD, Griesbach WE. The site of FSH and LH production in the rat pituitary. Endocrinology 1954; 55:785–793.
  43. Denef C, Hautekeete E, Dewals R, de Wolf A. Differential control of LH and FSH secretion by androgens in rat pituitary cells in culture: functional diversity of subpopulations separated by unit gravity sedimentation. Endocrinology 1980; 106:724–729.[Medline]
  44. Denef C, Swennen L, Andries M. Separated anterior pituitary cells and their response to hypophysiotrophic hormones. Int Rev Cytol 1982; 76:225–243.[Medline]
  45. Childs GV, Unabia G, Lee BL, Rougeau D. Heightened secretion by small and medium-sized LH gonadotrophs late in the cycle suggests contributions to the LH surge or possible paracrine interactions. Endocrinology 1992; 130:345–352.[Abstract]
  46. Farnworth PG. Gonadotrophin secretion revisited. How many ways can FSH leave a gonadotroph? J Endocrinol 1995; 145:387–395.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Meeran, H. F. Urbanski, S. J. Gregory, J. Townsend, and D. J. Tortonese
Developmental Changes in the Hormonal Identity of Gonadotroph Cells in the Rhesus Monkey Pituitary Gland
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2934 - 2942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Eagle, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tortonese, D. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS