Biol Reprod Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Biology of Reproduction 63, 1192-1204 (2000)
© 2000 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


ARTICLES

Neonatal Ovine Uterine Development Involves Alterations in Expression of Receptors for Estrogen, Progesterone, and Prolactin1

Kristin M. Taylora, C. Allison Graya, Margaret M. Joycea, M. David Stewarta, Fuller W. Bazera, and Thomas E. Spencer2,a

a Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, and Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2471


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effects of age on uterine histoarchitecture, cell proliferation, and hormone receptor expression were determined for neonatal ewe lambs from birth (Postnatal Day [PND] 0) to PND 56. Uteri were histologically evaluated and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), estrogen receptor alpha (ER-{alpha}), progesterone receptor (PR), and prolactin receptor (PRL-R) expression were characterized by in situ hybridization (ISH), immunohistochemistry, or both. The most striking feature of neonatal uterine development was the genesis and development of glands in the intercaruncular areas of endometrium. After birth, endometrial glandular epithelium (GE) budded and differentiated into the underlying stroma from the luminal epithelium (LE) between PNDs 1 and 7. Between PNDs 14 and 56, extensive coiling and branching morphogenesis of nascent endometrial glands occurred. By PND 56, the uterine wall appeared to be histoarchitecturally mature. At birth, nuclear PCNA protein was strongly detected in LE. Between PNDs 7 and 56, high levels of PCNA, ER-{alpha}, and PR gene expression were detected in both nascent and developing GE. Higher levels of PCNA and ER-{alpha} expression were detected in GE at the tips of developing glands as well as in the surrounding stroma. Progesterone was below detectable limits in serum. Serum estradiol-17ß levels were high on PND 1, increased from PNDs 14 to 28, and declined from PND 42 to PND 56. Serum PRL levels increased from PNDs 1 to 14 and declined thereafter. Using ISH and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, expression of mRNAs for short and long forms of the ovine PRL-R were first detected in nascent GE on PND 7 and increased between PNDs 7 and 56 in proliferating and differentiating GE. These results indicate that 1) uterine gland genesis is initiated between PNDs 1 and 7 after birth and is essentially completed by PND 56; 2) neonatal uterine morphogenesis involves temporal and spatial alterations in cell proliferation and ER-{alpha}, PR, and PRL-R gene expression; 3) PRL-R expression is a unique marker of GE differentiation and proliferation; and 4) serum estradiol-17ß and PRL levels increase during the onset of GE tubular branching morphogenesis. Results support the hypothesis that neonatal ovine uterine development involves epithelial PRL-R and ER-{alpha} activation to stimulate and maintain endometrial gland genesis and branching morphogenesis.

developmental biology, estradiol, estradiol receptor, female reproductive tract, hormone action, pituitary hormones, progesterone, progesterone receptor, steroid hormone receptors, steroid hormones, uterus


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The ovine uterine wall can be functionally divided into endometrium and myometrium. Normal adult ovine endometrium consists of luminal epithelium (LE), glandular epithelium (GE), several types of stroma (stratum compactum and stratum spongiosum), blood vessels, and immune cells. In sheep, endometrium has two distinct areas—aglandular caruncular and glandular intercaruncular. The caruncular areas have LE and compact stroma and are the sites of superficial implantation and placentation [1, 2]. Synepitheliochorial placentation in sheep involves the fusion of placental cotyledons with endometrial caruncles to form placentomes, which serve a primary role in fetal-maternal gas exchange and derivation of nutrients by the placenta [3]. Intercaruncular endometrial areas contain large numbers of uterine glands that synthesize and secrete or transport a variety of enzymes, growth factors, cytokines, lymphokines, hormones, transport proteins, and other substances that are collectively termed "histotroph". Available evidence in a number of species strongly supports the idea that endometrial epithelial secretions, primarily of GE origin, influence conceptus (embryo and associated placental membranes) growth and development, onset of pregnancy recognition signals, and implantation/placentation [48].

The dichotomous nature of adult ovine endometrium, which consists of both aglandular caruncular areas and glandular intercaruncular areas, provides an excellent model for the study of mechanisms that underlie establishment of divergent structural and functional areas within a single, mesodermally derived organ [9]. Uterine histogenesis has been partially described and incompletely characterized in fetal and neonatal ewes [914]. As in other mammals, the ovine uterus develops as a specialization of the paramesonephric ducts, which give rise to the infundibula, oviducts, uterus, cervix, and anterior vagina [2]. Paramesonephric duct fusion occurs between Gestational Days 34 and 55 in sheep, is partial, and produces a bicornuate uterus [911]. Postnatal uterine development is dramatic and includes the appearance and proliferation of uterine glands, development of endometrial folds and, to a lesser extent, differentiation of stromal layers and growth of the caruncular areas and myometrium [9, 13]. In an elegant study by Bartol et al. [14], the withdrawal from progesterone at birth was found to be an endocrine cue for the onset of endometrial gland genesis in neonates. Progestin inhibition of endometrial adenogenesis involves suppression of epithelial estrogen receptor alpha (ER-{alpha}) expression and specific growth factors and their receptors involved in epitheliomesenchymal interactions [15]. Indeed, prolonged exposure of neonatal ewe lambs to a progestin from birth prevents epigenetic endometrial gland development in the ovine uterus, thereby producing a unique adult endometrial phenotype that is characterized by the absence of uterine glands—the ovine uterine gland knockout (UGKO) ewe [8, 16]. UGKO ewes are infertile and the uterus cannot support the establishment or maintenance of pregnancy [16]. In adults, endometrial glands are the sole source of several expressed genes [8] and secretory proteins such as uterine milk proteins or serpins [17] and osteopontin [18]. During pregnancy, endometrial glands grow substantially in length and width during placentation prior to maximal increases in fetal growth [1, 17]. Histotroph produced by endometrial glands is important because ablation or reduction in uterine glands in sheep [16] and pigs [19], respectively, is associated with peri-implantation embryonic mortality. Thus, endometrial adenogenesis represents a critical period of uterine morphogenesis, which establishes, in a large part, the embryotrophic potential and functional capacity of the adult uterus [16, 19, 20].

Mechanisms that regulate postnatal endometrial adenogenesis in mammals are not well-defined. Based on regulatory mechanisms that govern gland development in other epitheliomesenchymal organs, uterine gland morphogenesis is proposed to involve 1) site-specific alterations in cell proliferation; 2) actions of specific hormones, growth factors, and their receptors; and 3) paracrine cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix interactions [19, 20]. Depending upon photoperiod, serum prolactin (PRL) concentrations are either high or low at birth in ewe lambs and then increase substantially between Postnatal Days (PNDs) 14 and 35 [21]. In adult ovine uterus, PRL receptors (PRL-R) are expressed exclusively in endometrial GE [17], suggesting that this receptor may play a role in endometrial GE morphogenesis in neonates as well as in adults.

At birth, the neonatal ovine reproductive tract has developed to a state similar to that of Gestational Day 100 in humans [22]. Therefore, postnatal development of uterine glands makes the neonatal uterus an attractive model for studying normal developmental processes such as patterning, branching morphogenesis, and functional differentiation as well as pathological conditions such as dysplasia and neoplasia. In order to begin investigations into the hormonal, cellular, and molecular mechanisms governing uterine wall development and, specifically, the ontogeny of endometrial glands, uteri were obtained from neonatal ewes between birth and PND 56 to determine effects of age on histoarchitecture, cell proliferation, and expression of receptors for ER-{alpha}, progesterone (PR), and PRL.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals

All experiments and surgical procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Agriculture Animals and approved by the University Laboratory Animal Care Committee of Texas A&M University (Animal Use Protocol 9-206).

Experimental Design, Tissue Collection, and Histology

Cross-bred Rambouillet ewe lambs were assigned randomly at birth (PND 0) to be necropsied on PND 1 (n = 6), 7 (n = 5), 14 (n = 5), 21 (n = 4), 28 (n = 5), 42 (n = 5), or 56 (n = 5). Prior to necropsy, blood samples were collected from each ewe by jugular venipuncture. The uterus was obtained and trimmed free of the broad ligament, oviduct, and cervix. Sections (~1 cm) from the mid-portion of each uterine horn were fixed in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2), embedded in Paraplast Plus (Oxford Labware, St. Louis, MO), sectioned (4–6 µm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin as described previously [16]. Additional uterine tissues for histology were obtained at necropsy from ewes at PND 0 (n = 5).

Radioimmunoassay

Blood samples were allowed to clot for 1 h at room temperature. Serum was then collected and stored at -20°C for hormone analysis. Concentrations of estradiol-17ß in 200 µl of serum, after solvent extraction, were determined by radioimmunoassay (RIA) [23]. Average extraction efficiency was 75%. Assay sensitivity was 1.5 pg per tube, and the intra-assay and interassay coefficients of variation were 5% and 9%, respectively. Concentrations of PR in serum were determined using an Active Progesterone RIA Kit (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Inc., Webster, TX) as described previously [16]. Assay sensitivity was 0.1 ng/ml, and the intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation were 5% and 10%, respectively. Concentrations of PRL in serum were determined using reagents for the ovine PRL RIA provided by Dr. A.F. Parlow and the National Hormone and Pituitary Program of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Purified ovine PRL (NIDDK-oPRL-I-3) was iodinated using the chloramine T reaction, and the assay was conducted using methods provided by the NIDDK Pituitary Hormones and Antisera Center. The assay was fully validated for parallelism and added mass recovery. Assay sensitivity was 0.1 ng/ml; the intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation were 5% and 12%, respectively. Assay results were calculated using the AssayZap program (Biosoft, Ferguson, CA).

In Situ Hybridization

Location of ER-{alpha}, PR, and PRL-R mRNAs in uterine tissue sections were determined by in situ hybridization as described previously [8, 16, 17]. Deparaffinized, rehydrated, and deproteinated tissue sections (5–7 µm) were hybridized with radiolabeled sense or antisense ER-{alpha}, PR, or PRL-R cRNA probes that were generated from linearized plasmid templates using in vitro transcription with [{alpha}-35S]uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP). Plasmid templates were partial cDNAs for ovine ER-{alpha} and ovine PR [23] and a full-length cDNA for the bovine long PRL-R (clone 26353) [24]. After hybridization and digestion with ribonuclease A, slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion, exposed at 4°C for 2 wk (ER-{alpha} and PR) or 5 wk (PRL-R), developed in Kodak D-19 developer, counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, and protected with coverslips.

Immunohistochemistry

Expression of immunoreactive proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), ER-{alpha}, and PR protein were detected in uterine tissue cross-sections (5–7 µm) using specific antibodies and a Super ABC Mouse/Rat Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Kit (Biomeda, Foster City, CA). Mouse monoclonal antibody to PCNA was purchased from DAKO (Carpinteria, CA). Rat monoclonal antibody to human ER-{alpha} (H222) was kindly provided by Dr. Geoffrey Greene (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL). Mouse monoclonal antibody to the human PR (MA1-411) was purchased from Affinity Bioreagents (Golden, CO). The final working antibody concentration was 1.9 µg/ml for PCNA and 5 µg/ml for both ER-{alpha} and PR. Negative controls were performed in which the primary antibody was substituted with the same concentration of purified normal mouse IgG (PCNA and PR) or rat IgG (ER-{alpha}) from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO). For PCNA and PR immunolocalization, antigen retrieval with the use of a boiling citrate buffer was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For ER-{alpha}, antigen retrieval using limited pronase digestion was performed as described previously [23].

Relative staining intensity for immunoreactive nuclear PCNA, ER-{alpha}, and PR protein expression were visually assessed in multiple tissue sections from each uterine horn from each ewe by two independent observers and scored as follows: absent (-; that is, no nuclear staining), weak (+), moderate (++), or strong (+++). Intercaruncular endometrial tissues were scored if they were histologically discernable (including LE, stroma, GE, caruncular endometrial tissues [including LE and stroma], and myometrial tissues).

Semi-Quantitative RT-PCR

Temporal alterations in the expression of mRNAs for short and long forms of the ovine PRL-R were determined by RT-PCR using methods described previously [17]. Briefly, cDNA was synthesized from total cellular RNA (5 µg) that was isolated from neonatal uteri using random and oligo-dT primers and SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). Newly synthesized cDNA was acid-ethanol precipitated, resuspended in 20 µl water, and stored at -20°C. The cDNAs were diluted (1:10 or 1:100) with sterile water prior to use in PCR reactions. The PCR reactions were performed using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer, Foster City, CA) and Optimized Buffer D (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for ß-actin or Optimized Buffer F (Invitrogen) for short and long PRL-R according to manufacturers' recommendations.

The PRL-R primers were ovine PRL-R sense (base pairs [bp] 709–729) 5'-TTC CCA GTG AAG GAT ACA AGC-3', ovine long PRL-R antisense (bp 1018–1000) 5'-GTT CTT TGG AGG GGT GTG G-3' (GenBank accession number AF041257), and ovine short PRL-R antisense (bp 894–873) 5'-CTA TTA AAA CAC AGA CAC AAG G-3' (GenBank accession number AF041977) [25]. Using the ovine ß-actin mRNA sequence (GenBank accession number U39357), the ß-actin primers were sense (bp 274–295) 5'-CAT CCT GAC CCT CAA GTA CCC-3' and antisense (bp 694–674) 5'-CCG ATG TCG AAG TGG TGG TG-3'. ß-Actin PCR reactions contained 5 µl cDNA (1:100), whereas short and long PRL-R reactions had 5 µl cDNA (1:10).

The ß-actin PCR conditions were 30 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. Short and long PRL-R PCR conditions were the same, but with an annealing temperature of 54°C. The PCR conditions and amount of template cDNA used in each reaction were optimized for each primer set to ensure linear amplification of the target as described previously [15, 17]. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The amount of DNA was quantitated by measuring the intensity of light emitted from correctly sized bands under ultraviolet light using an AlphaImager (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA). Values are presented as relative light units.

Photomicroscopy and Imaging

Photomicrographs were taken using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 photomicroscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., New York, NY) fitted with a Hamamatsu chilled three-color CCD camera (Hamamatsu Corporation, Bridgewater, NJ). Digital images were assembled using Adobe PhotoShop (Adobe Systems, Seattle, WA). Constant image acquisition parameters were used to ensure image equality. Black-and-white prints were made with a Kodak DS8650 color printer.

Statistical Analyses

RIA and RT-PCR data were subjected to least squares regression analysis using the Statistical Analysis System [26]. The ß-actin values were used as a covariate in statistical analyses of RT-PCR data to correct for differences in amounts of RT cDNA analyzed for each uterus. Serum estradiol-17ß values were log-transformed prior to homogeneity of regression analysis. All data are presented as untransformed least squares means (LSM) with standard errors (SEM).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Histoarchitecture of Neonatal Ovine Uterus

Histomorphogenesis of the ovine uterine wall between birth and PND 56 was dramatic (Fig. 1). Endometrium from PNDs 0 and 1 was devoid of uterine glands and consisted of a simple columnar epithelium supported by stroma. In presumptive intercaruncular endometrium between caruncular nodules, the LE was slightly ruffled and pseudostratified columnar. On PND 7, endometrial LE in all areas appeared to be pseudostratified columnar and the endometrium contained distinct, shallow tubular glands that invaginated slightly into the stroma. By PND 14, many simple, slightly coiled tubular glands were apparent and penetrated approximately a third to half of the distance from the uterine lumen to the inner circular layer of myometrium. Between PNDs 14 and 28, the intercaruncular endometrial areas expanded and there was extensive glandular development and growth. On PND 21, some endometrial glands extended to the myometrium. Although the glands in the upper stroma were tubular, the glands in the lower half of the stroma appeared branched and coiled. The intercaruncular LE was again simple columnar, whereas the caruncular LE was cuboidal. On PND 28, complex, coiled tubular glands were present throughout the intercaruncular endometrial stroma, and most of the glands extended to the adluminal border of the myometrium. On PNDs 42 and 56, complex, coiled, and branched tubular glands were present throughout the stroma. Between PNDs 28 and 56, growth of the endometrial GE appeared to be primarily in the lower coiled and branched glands. By PND 56, the uterine wall appeared to be essentially mature, with the intercaruncular endometrial area exhibiting two distinct stromal areas that were invested with numerous coiled and branched glands that extended radially from the LE through the stroma to the inner circular layer of myometrium.



View larger version (158K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Representative photomicrographs depicting development of intercaruncular endometrial areas of neonatal ovine uterine wall. Uterine tissue sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Car, Caruncle; L, luminal epithelium; G, glandular epithelium; S, stroma; M, myometrium; sc, stratum compactum; ss, stratum spongiosum; cG, sc glandular epithelium; sG, ss glandular epithelium. Magnification x260

Intercaruncular endometrial folds were apparent on PND 14, increased by PND 28, and were well-developed features of the uterine wall by PND 56. The LE in caruncular areas was simple columnar. The caruncular areas of the uterus and, to a lesser extent, the myometrium also appeared to have grown between birth and PND 56. Intensely vascularized caruncular areas were observed in PND 56 uteri. Regardless of neonatal age, many immune cells were distributed throughout the uterine wall and were frequently interspersed among the LE and GE.

PCNA Protein Expression

Immunoreactive PCNA expression was used as a marker for cell proliferation. PCNA is a highly conserved accessory protein of DNA polymerase {delta}, which is synthesized during the late G1 and S phases of the cell cycle, is essential for DNA synthesis, and is correlated with cellular proliferation [27]. As expected, PCNA protein was detected in the nuclei of most cells in the developing neonatal ovine uterus (Fig. 2). The complex temporal and spatial alterations in immunoreactive PCNA staining intensity of individual uterine tissues and cell types is summarized in Table 1.



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Representative photomicrographs illustrating the distribution of PCNA protein in developing neonatal ovine uterus. Immunoreactive protein was detected using mouse anti-PCNA monoclonal antibody and a BioStain Super ABC kit. Nuclear staining was not observed when irrelevant mouse IgG was substituted for primary antibodies. Car, Caruncle; L, luminal epithelium; G, glandular epithelium; S, stroma; M, myometrium. Magnification x260


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Distribution and relative abundance of immunoreactive PCNA protein in the neonatal ovine uterus.a

At birth (PND 0) and on PND 1, PCNA expression was strong in LE and moderate in stroma and myometrium. On PND 7, LE and nascent GE expressed high levels of PCNA protein, whereas PCNA expression in stroma and myometrium was weak or barely detectable. Between PNDs 14 and 56, the neck regions of the glands in the upper stroma expressed low to moderate levels of PCNA protein, whereas the tip regions of emerging and developing glands contained abundant nuclear PCNA protein that was expressed in a more uniform pattern. In addition, stromal cells in the immediate vicinity of the tips of developing glands expressed higher levels of nuclear PCNA protein compared with stromal cells beneath the LE surrounding the necks of developing glands or in the caruncules. In contrast to epithelia and stroma, PCNA expression in the myometrium after PND 1 was weak or not detectable. It is interesting that PCNA expression was abundant in immune cells in uteri from all days studied (results not shown).

Radioimmunoassay of Estradiol-17ß and Progesterone

As illustrated in Figure 3, serum estradiol-17ß concentrations were affected by postnatal day of age (P < 0.03, cubic). Serum estradiol-17ß concentrations were high on PND 1 (71 ± 17 pg/ml), increased between PND 14 (72 pg/ml) and PND 28 (200 pg/ml), and then declined between PND 42 (174 pg/ml) and PND 56 (91 pg/ml). In contrast, progesterone was not detectable by RIA in any serum samples from PND 1 to 56 (results not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Concentrations of estradiol-17ß (LSM ± SEM) in serum from neonatal ewes between PNDs 1 and 56

ER-{alpha} mRNA and Protein Expression

Temporal and spatial alterations in ER-{alpha} expression of individual uterine tissues and cell types are summarized in Table 2. In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis revealed parallel patterns of ER-{alpha} mRNA and protein expression in developing uterine tissues (Fig. 4) and, therefore, both will be discussed together.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Distribution and relative abundance of immunoreactive ER-{alpha} protein in the neonatal ovine uterus.a



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Expression of ER-{alpha} mRNA and protein in developing neonatal ovine uterus. Left: in situ localization of ER-{alpha} mRNA. Cross-sections of uterine wall from neonatal ewes were hybridized with {alpha}-35S-labeled antisense or sense ovine ER-{alpha} cRNA probes. Hybridized sections were digested with ribonuclease A, and protected transcripts were visualized by liquid emulsion autoradiography. Developed slides were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, and photomicrographs were taken under brightfield or darkfield illumination. Right: immunohistochemical localization of ER-{alpha} protein. Immunoreactive protein was detected using rat anti-human ER-{alpha} monoclonal and a BioStain Super ABC kit. Nuclear staining was not observed when irrelevant rat IgG was substituted for primary antibodies. L, Luminal epithelium; G, glandular epithelium; S, stroma; M, myometrium. Magnification x260

Intercaruncular endometrium At birth, ER-{alpha} gene expression was low or not detectable in LE and low in stroma. On PND 1, immunoreactive ER-{alpha} protein was uniformly detected at low to moderate levels in nuclei of all uterine wall tissues. On PND 7, ER-{alpha} was strikingly abundant in newly differentiated GE. Although ER-{alpha} expression in LE was variegated, uniform and intense staining was observed in nuclei at the invaginating tips of emerging glands. On PND 14, ER-{alpha} expression was uniformly strong in the developing slightly coiled, tubular glands. Between PNDs 21 and 56, abundant ER-{alpha} expression was detected in the middle and tips of the coiled, branched, tubular glands, whereas expression was strikingly lower in the necks of developed glands. In contrast to developing GE, ER-{alpha} expression in LE was moderate to weak on PNDs 0 to 42, and weak or undetectable on PND 56.

Stromal cell nuclear staining for ER-{alpha} was weak or moderate on PNDs 0 to 14 and moderate to strong on PNDs 21 to 56. On PNDs 28 to 56, ER-{alpha} expression in stromal cells underneath developing glands and near myometrium was higher than in those near LE.

Caruncular endometrium At birth, ER-{alpha} gene expression was weak or absent in LE, but moderate in stroma. On PND 1 and thereafter, ER-{alpha} in LE was expressed at low to moderate levels. Stromal cells expressed low levels of ER-{alpha} protein from birth to PND 21. Thereafter, ER-{alpha} was expressed at moderate levels.

Myometrium and vasculature Myometrial ER-{alpha} expression was low at birth and weak or undetectable thereafter. Nuclear ER-{alpha} expression was constitutively detected in endothelial cells that lined blood vessels. No nuclear staining was observed when irrelevant rat IgG was substituted for the H222 primary antibody or when primary antibody was omitted.

Progesterone mRNA and Protein Expression

In situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analysis revealed differential patterns of PR mRNA and protein expression in developing uterine tissues (Fig. 5). Although abundant PR mRNA was detected in stroma, immunoreactive PR protein was relatively weak. In contrast, low levels of PR mRNA were detected in endometrial epithelia, but there were moderate to abundant levels of immunoreactive PR protein in the same epithelia. These differences in expression of PR mRNA and protein were observed consistently in all uteri from ewes regardless of age at hysterectomy. Temporal and spatial alterations in immunoreactive PR protein expression of individual uterine tissues and cell types are summarized in Table 3.



View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Expression of PR mRNA and protein in developing neonatal ovine uterus. Left: in situ localization of PR mRNA. Cross-sections of uterine wall from neonatal ewes were hybridized with {alpha}-35S-labeled antisense or sense ovine PR cRNA probes. Hybridized sections were digested with ribonuclease A, and protected transcripts were visualized by liquid emulsion autoradiography. Developed slides were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, and photomicrographs were taken under brightfield or darkfield illumination. Right: immunohistochemical localization of PR protein. Immunoreactive protein was detected using mouse anti-PR monoclonal antibody and a BioStain Super ABC kit. Nuclear staining was not observed when irrelevant mouse IgG was substituted for primary antibodies. Car, Caruncle; L, luminal epithelium; G, glandular epithelium; S, stroma; M, myometrium. Magnification x260


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Distribution and relative abundance of immunoreactive PR protein in the neonatal ovine uterus.a

Intercaruncular endometrium From PNDs 0 to 7, immunoreactive PR expression was detected in LE and appeared variegated from strong to weak levels in nuclei. In striking contrast, there was strong nuclear PR staining in all LE cells on PND 14. On PND 7, PR expression in emerging GE was variegated and strong at the tips of invaginating glands. On PND 14 and thereafter, PR expression was strong in LE and in all emerging and developed glands. Stromal cell nuclear staining for PR was moderate to weak at birth and weak thereafter.

Caruncular endometrium At birth, PR protein was detected in caruncular LE and was variegated. In contrast, nuclear PR staining was detected at high levels in LE on PND 7 and all days thereafter. Stromal cell nuclear staining for PR was moderate to abundant at birth and weak to moderate thereafter.

Myometrium and vasculature In myometrium, PR staining was abundant at birth, declined to moderate levels on PND 1, and was weak or undetectable thereafter. PR gene expression was not detected in blood vessels. No nuclear staining was observed when irrelevant mouse IgG was substituted for the MA1-411 primary antibody or when primary antibody was omitted.

Radioimmunoassay of Prolactin

As illustrated in Figure 6, serum PRL concentrations were affected by postnatal day of age (P < 0.01, cubic). Serum PRL concentrations increased between PND 1 (98 ± 33 ng/ml) and PND 14 (500 ng/ml) and then declined to PND 56 (147 ng/ml).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Concentrations of prolactin (LSM ± SEM) in serum from neonatal ewes between PNDs 1 and 56

In Situ Hybridization Analysis of Prolactin Receptor mRNA in Ovine Uterus

As shown in Figure 7, expression of PRL-R mRNA was not detected in uteri from ewes on PNDs 0 and 1. No specific hybridization signal was detected in endometrial LE, stroma, immune cells, blood vessels, or myometrium as judged from comparison to control serial-sectioned slides that were hybridized with sense PRL-R cRNA probe. In contrast to PNDs 0 and 1, specific PRL-R mRNA expression was detected at low levels in newly differentiated endometrial GE buds on PND 7. Between PNDs 7 and 56, PRL-R mRNA expression was detected only in nascent and developing endometrial glands. It is interesting that PRL-R mRNA expression was much higher in coiled and branched glands from uteri of ewes on PNDs 28, 42, and 56. In the PND 14, PND 42, and sense darkfield photmicrographs, the intensely white cells are melanocytes and do not express PRL-R.



View larger version (208K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. In situ localization of PRL-R mRNA in developing neonatal ovine uterus. Cross-sections of uterine wall from neonatal ewes were hybridized with {alpha}-35S-labeled antisense or sense bovine PRL-R cRNA probes. Hybridized sections were digested with ribonuclease A, and protected transcripts were visualized by liquid emulsion autoradiography. Developed slides were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, and photomicrographs were taken under brightfield or darkfield illumination. Car, Caruncle; L, luminal epithelium; G, glandular epithelium; S, stroma; M, myometrium. Magnification x415 (D1–D14), x327 (D21–D56)

RT-PCR Analysis of Prolactin Receptor mRNA Expression

As illustrated in Figure 8A, primers were designed to amplify regions of mRNAs that encode the short and long forms of ovine PRL-R based on the alternative splicing pattern of PRL-R mRNAs produced from a single gene [25]. A single forward primer was designed within exon 9, which is contained in both splice variants. One reverse primer was designed within the last 39 bp of the short PRL-R mRNA and another within exon 10 of the long PRL-R mRNA. Use of these specific primers with the exon 9 common primer was predicted to yield different size cDNA products for the long (310 bp) and short (207 bp) PRL-R mRNA alternative splice variants. Primers were also designed to amplify a region of ovine ß-actin mRNA (420 bp) as a control for cDNA concentration. Preliminary experiments were conducted to ensure that the amount of PCR product derived from a given amount of cDNA amplified by PCR was directly proportional to the concentration of target RT cDNA in the sample (results not shown).



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. PT-PCR analysis of PRL-R mRNA in uterine tRNA from neonatal ewes. A) Schematic illustration of the approach used to amplify the long (310 bp) and short (207 bp) alternative splice forms of the ovine PRL-R gene used in RT-PCR analyses. S, Stop codon. B) Representative RT-PCR analysis of PRL-R mRNAs and ß-actin in uterine tRNA samples. C) Effects of neonatal age on long and short PRL-R mRNA expression in ovine uterus. Results are presented as relative light units (LSM) with SEM

Consistent with the histological absence of endometrial glands on PNDs 0 and 1 and in situ hybridization results, PRL-R mRNA was not detected in total uterine RNA in ewes on PND 1 by RT-PCR, but PRL-R mRNA expression was first detected in total uterine RNA from PND 7 (Fig. 8B). As expected, both long (310 bp) and short (207 bp) forms of ovine PRL-R mRNA were present in neonatal uteri from PND 7 to PND 56. Two specific PCR products (310 bp and 350 bp) were consistently detected using the long PRL-R mRNA primers. The expected 310-bp product was identical to the long ovine PRL-R cDNA, whereas sequence analysis of the 350-bp cDNA product derived from the long PRL-R primers revealed that the cDNA included the 39-bp exon of the short PRL-R mRNA [17]. Sequence analyses of the PRL-R cDNAs confirmed their identity (results not shown). The ratio of the 350 bp to 310 bp long PRL-R cDNA products did not change with day of age (P > 0.1). Furthermore, the relative ratio of short to long PRL-R mRNAs revealed no effect of day (P > 0.1). As illustrated in Figure 8C, regression analysis indicated that relative levels of short and long PRL-R mRNA expression in total uterine RNA were affected by neonatal age and increased (P < 0.01, quadratic) between PNDs 7 and 14, and then remained relatively high on PND 56.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Histoarchitectural evidence from the present study and earlier reports [9, 1214] indicate that endometrial gland genesis is a unique postnatal event in ovine uterine morphogenesis. Postnatal uterine morphogenesis involves the emergence, proliferation, and differentiation of endometrial glands, development of endometrial folds and, to a lesser extent, growth of endometrial caruncular areas and the myometrium. Uterine gland development (adenogenesis) begins between PNDs 1 and 7, when shallow epithelial invaginations appear along the LE in presumptive intercaruncular areas. Between PNDs 7 and 14, the nascent GE buds proliferate into the stroma and form tubular structures that begin to branch and coil by PND 21. After PND 21, the majority of glandular morphogenetic activity involves branching morphogenesis of tubular and coiled endometrial glands to form terminal end bud structures in the lower stroma. By PND 56, uterine morphogenesis is essentially complete because the caruncular and intercaruncular endometrial areas are histoarchitecturally similar to that of the adult uterus. Final maturation and growth does not occur until puberty [12] and during pregnancy [1, 17]. Thus, functional uterine capacity is defined, in part, during the critical period of neonatal uterine adenogenesis [19, 20]. During each pregnancy, the endometrial glands experience recurrent morphogenesis and terminal bud development and differentiation [1, 17]. Therefore, the overall pattern of endometrial gland genesis and development in the ovine uterus is very similar to epithelial gland differentiation in the mammary gland [28, 29]. Overall, the histoarchitecture of glandular genesis and morphogenesis in sheep is similar to that in the uterus of humans, primates, rabbits, and other animals [2, 22]. The exception is the rodent uterus, which does not contain the highly coiled and branched glandular structures that are characteristic of endometria in most mammals. Thus, the hormonal, cellular, and molecular mechanisms governing endometrial adenogenesis and glandular branching morphogenesis in other mammals may not be fully present in rodents. However, secretory products of endometrial glands are required for conceptus implantation and survival in rodents, pigs, and sheep [7, 16, 19]. Therefore, endometrial adenogenesis in neonatal ewes determines, in part, the functional capacity and embryotrophic potential of the uterus in adult ewes.

Overall patterns of PCNA staining were similar to patterns of [3H]thymidine labeling reported for neonatal ovine endometrium at birth and on PNDs 13 and 26 [14]. Most uterine cell types contained immunoreactive PCNA protein. In contrast, PCNA expression in myometrium was either low or absent during this period, which is consistent with evidence that myometrial morphogenesis and development occurs primarily during fetal life and is essentially complete at birth [9]. High levels of PCNA expression in LE at birth foreshadowed differentiation and emergence of endometrial gland buds between PNDs 1 and 7. On PNDs 0 to 7, high levels of nuclear PCNA protein were detected in LE and emerging GE. Whether or not GE bud invagination into the subepithelial stroma requires cell proliferation remains to be determined. Gray et al. [15] reported that progestin-induced ablation of endometrial gland genesis in neonatal ovine uterus did not involve direct suppression of epithelial cell proliferation. In developing lung epithelium, bud outgrowth is not accompanied by induction of localized cell proliferation [30], but appears to involve remodeling of the basement membrane extracellular matrix [31]. This concept is supported by histochemical studies of the epithelial basement membrane in neonatal ovine uterus [13] and porcine uterus [32].

Previous results from studies of neonatal ovine [15, 19], porcine [32], and rodent [33] uteri as well as regenerating postmenstrual primate uterus [34, 35] suggest that uterine gland morphogenesis is supported and regulated through interactions between epithelia and stroma. These interactions establish developmentally critical tissue microenvironments that are conducive to support and maintain spatially focused alterations in DNA synthesis and progressive development of the glandular intercaruncular endometrium [19, 20]. The focused area of PCNA expression by tips of the developing GE and surrounding stroma suggest that the local microenvironment favors proliferation of both cell types. The concept that GE-stromal interactions are required for overall endometrial morphogenesis and establishment of proper histoarchitecture is supported by elegant tissue recombination studies of mouse uterus [36, 37] and studies of uterine gland knockout (UGKO) ewe uterus [8, 15, 16]. The endometrium of UGKO ewes is much thinner and the stroma lacks delineation into upper stratum compactum and lower stratum spongiosum. Given that UGKO uteri lack endometrial glands, it is inferred that GE-stromal interactions are required for proper intercaruncular endometrial morphogenesis in the developing ovine uterus. These interactions may also affect overall uterine wall morphogenesis because the strategy of progestin-induced uterine gland ablation in the neonatal ewe results in an adult ewe, which possesses an aglandular uterus that weighs less and has shorter horn length than uteri of comparable normal adult ewes [38].

The initial site of endometrial GE budding and differentiation from the LE occurred in endometrial clefts between caruncular nodules between PNDs 1 and 7. The mechanisms that specify differentiation of LE into GE in the clefts between caruncular nodules remain unknown but are of particular interest. In several other mammalian species, including pig [32, 39], mouse [33, 40], and rat [41], uterine endometrial glands are also absent at birth but develop rapidly after birth. In ewes, removal from a progesterone-dominated environment, as a consequence of birth, seems to be the endocrine cue for uterine gland genesis, because endometrial adenogenesis is inhibited both acutely and permanently in sheep by exposure to Norgestomet, a potent synthetic 19-norprogestin, from birth [8, 1416, 38]. In neonatal pigs and sheep, endometrial adenogenesis proceeds normally for a period of time following ovariectomy at birth [14, 39]. Although ovarian and uterine weights increase between birth and PND 28 [12] in ewes, progesterone was not detectable in peripheral circulation after birth in the present study and is below detectable limits until puberty [12, 42, 43]. Initiation of endometrial gland development in neonatal ovine uterus is ovary- and ovarian steroid-independent because ovariectomy at birth did not alter uterine histoarchitecture on PND 13 [14]. However, ovariectomy at birth did affect gross uterine growth after PND 28 in ewes [12] and after PND 60 in pigs [39]. In the present study, estradiol-17ß was detected at relatively high levels in ewe lambs on PND 1, increased between PNDs 14 and 28, and then declined between PNDs 42 and 56. The origin of estradiol-17ß may be from the ovary as well as the adrenal gland [12]. Large numbers of growing and vesicular follicles are present in ovary at birth and on PND 28, both of which decline substantially between PNDs 28 and 84 [12]. In that study, estrogens could not be detected after birth in urine of ewe lambs, but the assay using thin-layer chromatography was rather insensitive compared with the RIA used in the present study.

In the present study, neonatal ovine uterine gland morphogenesis was accompanied by abundant expression of ER-{alpha} in emerging, proliferating, and developing GE. The initial increase in ER-{alpha} expression between PNDs 0 and 1 is likely due to a decrease in circulating concentrations of PR in neonatal ewes because progestins suppress epithelial ER-{alpha} gene expression [15]. Genesis of endometrial glands in porcine [39] and rodent [4447] uteri also involves coordinated changes in epithelial phenotype, which is marked by ER-{alpha} expression in nascent endometrial GE. In those species, the stroma is ER-{alpha}-positive at birth followed by ER-{alpha}-positive LE and then GE. Although estrogen is not detectable in serum during the early neonatal period in pigs and rodents, ER-{alpha} are functional, inasmuch as exogenous administration of estrogens to neonatal gilts [48, 49] and rodents [50] induces precocious endometrial gland development and proliferation. In addition to direct ligand-dependent activation of epithelial ER-{alpha}, the proliferative effects of inappropriate estrogen on epithelial proliferation appear to be mediated primarily by stromal ER-{alpha} via production of paracrine stromal-derived growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor (EGF) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) [51]. In developing neonatal pig uterus, activated ER-{alpha} is required for gland genesis because administration of the ER-{alpha} antagonist, ICI182,780, inhibits or severely retards endometrial adenogenesis [49]. It is not known whether ER-{alpha} antagonists will ablate endometrial adenogenesis in the neonatal ewe. Homozygous ER-{alpha} null mice (ERKO) have hypoplastic uteri that contain all characteristic cell types in reduced proportions [52] and ERKO mouse uteri contain reduced numbers of uterine glands [53]. Collectively, studies with ERKO mice suggest that ER-{alpha} is not essential for fetal organogenesis, but is essential for normal postnatal uterine growth and development. In neonatal rat uterus, gland genesis is initiated between PNDs 10 and 15 [50]. Endogenous serum estrogens increase beginning on PND 9 to PND 11 [54], and antiestrogens inhibit uterine gland genesis [55]. While critical experiments remain to be conducted, gland morphogenesis in neonatal ovine endometrium is most likely an ER-{alpha}-dependent phenomenon that requires ligand-dependent and, perhaps, ligand-independent activation, as in the neonatal pig [39, 49] and rat [55].

The high levels of PR expression in LE and nascent and proliferating GE may be the consequence of ER-{alpha} activation. In addition to effects of serum estradiol-17ß, ligand-independent activation may occur within nascent and proliferating GE because the EGF-like growth factor, heregulin, appears to stimulate proliferation and PR gene expression in an ER-{alpha}-dependent manner in MCF-7 cells [56]. In the present study, PR mRNA was abundantly expressed by stromal cells, whereas immunoreactive PR protein was low in these cells. This finding agrees with previous observations on PR gene expression in ovine uterus on PND 28 [15]. The mechanism underlying the regulation of PR gene expression in the stroma is not known, but may involve post-transcriptional effects. A requirement for ER-{alpha} in ovine uterine adenogenesis is supported by the finding that progestin-induced ablation of endometrial gland genesis in neonatal ewes is mediated by suppression of epithelial ER-{alpha} expression [15]. Ablation of endometrial gland genesis in neonatal gilts treated with ICI 182,780 [49] and in neonatal ewes treated with Norgestomet from birth [15] may reflect the loss or attenuation of ER-{alpha} signaling. Studies to determine the role of serum estrogens, specific growth factors, and ER-{alpha} activation in neonatal ovine uterine morphogenesis are currently underway.

In addition to a role for ER-{alpha}, PRL also appears to play a role in neonatal ovine endometrial adenogenesis. In other epitheliomesenchymal organs, PRL stimulates differentiation and development of the epithelium [57]. Using mammary glands from PRL-R null mice, Brisken et al. [29] demonstrated that PRL directly controls lobuloalveolar development, but not alveolar bud formation or ductal side branching. In agreement with a previous report [21], serum PRL concentrations increased between PNDs 1 and 14 and then declined to PND 56, which correlates with the onset and maintenance of GE proliferation in the developing uterine wall. The PRL-R mRNAs for the short and long PRL-R proteins were expressed in nascent and proliferating endometrial GE, and the relative levels of expression increased sevenfold between PNDs 7 and 56. It is interesting that the majority of PRL-R gene expression was in the branching and terminally differentiating GE between PNDs 21 and 56. In the adult endometrium of sheep, humans, and primates [17, 58, 59], the PRL-R gene is also expressed only in the endometrial glands and, in ewes, the increase during pregnancy is highly correlated with endometrial gland hyperplasia and hypertrophy [17]. Collectively, evidence from the present study and others supports the idea that PRL stimulates PRL-R in nascent and proliferating GE. In GE, PRL may increase ER-{alpha} expression [60]. In addition, PRL actions via the short and long PRL-Rs stimulates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade [61] and may result in serine phosphorylation and activation of ER-{alpha} in a ligand-independent manner [62] to stimulate and maintain endometrial gland morphogenesis. The sustained activation of MAPK and ER-{alpha} signaling pathways may stimulate and maintain endometrial gland morphogenesis in developing neonatal ovine uterus. Higher levels of PRL-R mRNA are localized in endometrial glands undergoing the most intense proliferation and differentiation as detected by PCNA staining. Although the PRL-R gene is preferentially expressed in the lower coiled and branched glands of neonatal and adult endometrium, it remains to be determined if PRL in neonatal ewes plays a role in terminal gland development or in bud formation and ductal branching. This hypothesis is supported by observations that hyperprolactinemia causes uterine glandular hypertrophy in adult mouse, rabbit, and pig [6365], and that intrauterine administration of placental lactogen, a PRL-like hormone stimulates proliferation of endometrial glands and, in particular, the terminal ends of coiled and branched glands in the lower stroma of adult ewes [66]. Given the central role ascribed to PRL-R in mammary gland morphogenesis and function [29], PRL-R in nascent GE of developing uterus may play a similar, albeit undiscovered role. Other growth factors, such as EGF and IGF-I, may also act on endometrial glands via specific Type I tyrosine kinase receptors to stimulate MAPK and activate ER-{alpha} in a ligand-independent manner. Studies are currently underway to determine the precise roles of prolactin, estrogen, PRL, ER-{alpha}, and PR in endometrial adenogenesis and glandular morphogenesis in sheep.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Dr. Shawn W. Ramsey and Mr. Todd Taylor of the Texas A&M Sheep and Goat Center for assistance with animal husbandry, Dr. Geoffrey L. Greene (University of Chicago) for providing the H222 antibody, Dr. Linda A. Schuler (University of Wisconsin-Madison) for providing the bovine long PRL-R cDNA, Dr. Tom Welsh and Mrs. Colette Abbey (Texas A&M University) for assistance with the estradiol-17ß RIA, and Dr. A.F. Parlow and the NIDDK-NHPP for providing ovine PRL RIA reagents.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 10 May 2000.

1 Supported in part by U.S. Department of Agriculture NRI competitive grant 98-35203-6322 and NIH grant P30 ES09106. Back

2 Correspondence: Thomas E. Spencer, Center for Animal Biotechnology and Genomics, 442 Kleberg Center, 2471 TAMU, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471. FAX: 979 862 2662; tspencer{at}ansc.tamu.edu Back

Accepted: June 1, 2000.

Received: April 7, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wimsatt WA. New histological observations on the placenta of the sheep. Am J Anat 1950; 87:391–436[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Mossman HA. Vertebrate Fetal Membranes. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1987
  3. Amoroso EC. The interaction of the trophoblast and endometrium in the sheep. J Anat 1951; 85:428–429
  4. Bazer FW. Uterine protein secretions: relationship to development of the conceptus. J Anim Sci 1975; 41:1376–1382
  5. Roberts RM, Bazer FW. The functions of uterine secretions. J Reprod Fertil 1988; 82:875–892[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Martal J, Chene N, Camous S, Huynh L, Lantier F, Hermier P, L'Haridon R, Charpigny G, Charlier M, Chaouat G. Recent developments and potentialities for reducing embryo mortality in ruminants: the role of IFN-tau and other cytokines in early pregnancy. Reprod Fertil Dev 1997; 9:355–380[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stewart CL, Cullinan EB. Preimplantation development of the mammalian embryo and its regulation by growth factors. Dev Genet 1997; 21:91–101[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Spencer TE, Gray CA, Joyce MM, Jenster G, Wood CG, Bazer FW, Wiley AA, Bartol FF. Discovery and characterization of genes expressed in the endometrial epithelium using the ovine uterine gland knockout model. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4070–4080[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wiley AA, Bartol FF, Barron DH. Histogenesis of the ovine uterus. J Anim Sci 1987; 64:1262–1269
  10. Davies J. Comparative embryology. In: Wynn RM (ed.), Cellular Biology of the Uterus. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts; 1967: 13–32
  11. Bryden MM. Prenatal developmental anatomy of the sheep, with particular reference to the period of the embryo (11 to 34 days). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 1969. D.V.M. Thesis
  12. Kennedy JP, Worthington CA, Cole ER. The post-natal development of the ovary and uterus of the merino lamb. J Reprod Fertil 1974; 36:275–282[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Goodlett DR. Ovine uterine morphogenesis: histochemical aspects of endometrial development in the fetus and neonate. J Anim Sci 1988; 66:1303–1313
  14. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Coleman DA, Wolfe DF, Riddell MG. Ovine uterine morphogenesis: effects of age and progestin administration and withdrawal on neonatal endometrial development and DNA synthesis. J Anim Sci 1988; 66:3000–3009
  15. Gray CA, Taylor KM, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Mechanisms regulating 19-norprogestin inhibition of endometrial gland morphogenesis in the neonatal ovine uterus. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; (in press)
  16. Gray CA, Bartol FF, Taylor KM, Wiley AA, Ramsey WS, Ott TL, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. The ovine uterine gland knockout model: effects of gland ablation on the estrous cycle. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:448–456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Stewart MD, Johnson GA, Burghardt RC, Schuler LA, Bazer FW, Spencer TE. Prolactin receptor and uterine milk protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:1779–1789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Bazer FW. Ovine osteopontin: I. Cloning and expression of mRNA in the uterus during the peri-implantation period. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:884–891[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Floyd JG, Ott TL, Bazer FW, Gray CA, Spencer TE. Uterine differentiation as a foundation for subsequent fertility. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1999; 54:285–300
  20. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Spencer TE, Vallet JL, Christenson RK. Early uterine development in pigs. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1993; 48:99–116[Medline]
  21. Ebling FJ, Wood RI, Suttie JM, Adel TE, Foster DL. Prenatal photoperiod influences neonatal prolactin secretion in the sheep. Endocrinology 1989; 125:384–391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. O'Rahilly R. Prenatal human development. In: Wynn RM, Jolli WP (eds.), Biology of the Uterus, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Medical Book Company; 1989: 35–55
  23. Spencer TE, Ing, NH, Ott TL, Mayes JS, Becker WC, Watson GH, Mirando MA, Bazer FW. Intrauterine injection of ovine interferon-tau alters oestrogen receptor and oxytocin receptor expression in the endometrium of cyclic ewes. J Mol Endocrinol 1995; 15:203–220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Scott P, Kessler MA, Schuler LA. Molecular cloning of the bovine prolactin receptor and distribution of prolactin and growth hormone receptor transcripts in fetal and utero-placental tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1992; 89:47–58[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Bignon C, Binart N, Ormandy C, Schuler LA, Kelly PA, Djiane J. Long and short forms of the ovine prolactin receptor: cDNA cloning and genomic analysis reveal that the two forms arise by different alternative splicing mechanisms in ruminants and in rodents. J Mol Endocrinol 1997; 19:109–120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc.; 1990
  27. Waseem NH, Lane DP. Monoclonal antibody analysis of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Structural conservation and the detection of a nucleolar form. J Cell Sci 1990; 96:121–129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Houdebine LM, Dijane J, Dusanter-Fourt I, Martel P, Kelly PA, Devinoy E, Servely JL. Hormonal action controlling mammary activity. J Dairy Sci 1985; 68:489–500
  29. Brisken C, Kaur S, Chavarria TE, Binart N, Sutherland RL, Weinberg RA, Kelly PA, Ormandy CJ. Prolactin controls mammary gland development via direct and indirect mechanisms. Dev Biol 1999; 210:96–106[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nogawa H, Morita K, Cardoso WV. Bud formation precedes the appearance of differential cell proliferation during branching morphogenesis of mouse lung epithelium in vitro. Dev Dyn 1998; 213:228–235[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Mollard R, Dziadek M. A correlation between epithelial proliferation rates, basement membrane component localization patterns, and morphogenetic potential in the embryonic mouse lung. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998; 19:71–82[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Spencer TE, Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Coleman DA, Wolfe DF. Neonatal porcine endometrial development involves coordinated changes in DNA synthesis, glycosaminoglycan distribution, and 3H-glucosamine labeling. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:729–740[Abstract]
  33. Ogasawara Y, Okamoto S, Kitamura Y, Matsumoto K. Proliferative patterns of uterine cells from birth to adult-hood in intact, neonatally castrated, and/or adrenalectomized mice, assayed by incorporation of [125I] iododeoxyuridine. Endocrinology 1983; 113:582–587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Padykula HA, Coles LG, McCracken JA, King NW Jr, Longcope C, Kaiserman-Abramof IR. A zonal pattern of cell proliferation and differentiation in the rhesus endometrium during the estrogen surge. Biol Reprod 1984; 31:1103–1118[Abstract]
  35. Padykula HA, Coles LG, Okulicz WC, Rapaport SI, McCracken JA, King NW Jr, Longcope C, Kaiserman-Abramof IR. The basalis of the primate endometrium: a bifunctional germinal compartment. Biol Reprod 1989; 40:681–690[Abstract]
  36. Cunha GR. Stromal induction and specification of morphogenesis and cytodifferentiation of the epithelia of the müllerian ducts and urogenital sinus during development of the uterus and vagina in mice. J Exp Zool 1976; 196:361–370[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Cunha GR, Lung B. The importance of stroma in morphogenesis and functional activity of urogenital epithelium. In Vitro 1979; 15:50–71[Medline]
  38. Bartol FF, Wiley AA, Spencer TE, Ing NH, Ott TL, Bazer FW. Progestin exposure from birth: epigenetic induction of a unique adult uterine phenotype in sheep—a glandless endometrium. Biol Reprod 1997; 56(suppl):133 (abstract 202)
  39. Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Spencer TE, Moss AG, Bartol FF. Ovary-independent estrogen receptor expression in neonatal porcine endometrium. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:1009–1019[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Bigsby RM, Cunha GR. Effects of progestins and glucocorticoids on deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in the uterus of the neonatal mouse Endocrinology 1985; 117:2520–2526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Branham WS, Sheehan DM. Ovarian and adrenal contributions to postnatal growth and differentiation of the rat uterus. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:863–872[Abstract]
  42. Foster DL, Cook B, Nalbandov A. Regulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the fetal and neonatal lamb: effect of castration during early postnatal period on levels of LH in sera and pituitaries of neonatal lambs. Biol Reprod 1972; 6:253–257[Abstract]
  43. Leifer RW, Foster DL, Dziuk PJ. Levels of LH in the sera and pituitaries of female lambs following ovariectomy and administration of estrogen. Endocrinology 1972; 90:981–986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Fishman RB, Branham WS, Streck RD, Sheehan DM. Ontogeny of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the postnatal rat uterus. Biol Reprod 1996; 55:1221–1230[Abstract]
  45. Korach KS, Horigome T, Tomooka Y, Yamashita S, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA. Immunodetection of estrogen receptor in epithelial and stromal tissues of neonatal mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988; 85:3334–3337[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Yamashita S, Newbold RR, McLachlan JA, Korach KS. Developmental pattern of estrogen receptor expression in female mouse genital tracts. Endocrinology 1989; 125:2888–2896[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Greco TL, Furlow JD, Duello TM, Gorski J. Immunodetection of estrogen receptors in fetal and neonatal female mouse reproductive tracts. Endocrinology 1991; 129:1326–1332[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Spencer TE, Wiley AA, Bartol FF. Neonatal age and period of estrogen exposure affect porcine uterine growth, morphogenesis, and protein synthesis. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:741–751[Abstract]
  49. Tarleton BJ, Wiley AA, Bartol FF. Endometrial development and adenogenesis in the neonatal pig: effects of estradiol valerate and the antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:253–263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Branham WS, Sheehan DM, Zehr DR, Ridlon E, Medlock KL, Nelson CJ. The postnatal ontogeny of rat uterine glands and the age-related effects of 17ß-estradiol. Endocrinology 1985; 117:2229–2237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Cooke PS, Buchanan DL, Lubahn DB, Cunha GR. Mechanism of estrogen action: lessons from the estrogen receptor-{alpha} knockout mouse. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:470–475[Free Full Text]
  52. Lubahn DB, Moyer JS, Golding TS, Couse JF, Korach KS, Smithies O. Alteration of reproductive tract function but not prenatal sexual development after insertional disruption of the mouse estrogen receptor gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:11162–11166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Curtis SW, Clark J, Myers P, Korach KS. Disruption of estrogen signaling does not prevent progesterone action in the estrogen receptor alpha knockout mouse uterus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:3646–3651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Dohler KD, Wuttke W. Changes with age in levels of serum gonadotropins, prolactin, and gonadal steroids in prepubertal male and female rates. Endocrinology 1975; 97:898–907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Branham WS, Sheehan DM, Zehr DR, Medlock KL, Nelson CJ, Ridlon E. Inhibition of uterine gland genesis by tamoxifen. Endocrinology 1985; 117:2238–2248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Pietras RJ, Arboleda J, Reese DM, Wongvipat N, Pegram MD, Ramos L, Groman CM, Parker MG, Sliwkowski MX, Slamon DJ. HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene 1995; 10:2435–2446[Medline]
  57. Bole-Feysot C, Goffin V, Edery M, Binart N, Kelly PA. Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: signal transduction, pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knock out mice. Endocr Rev 1998; 19:225–268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Jones RL, Critchely HO, Brooks J, Jabbour HN, McNeilly AS. Localization and temporal expression of prolactin receptor in human endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:258–262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Frasor J, Gaspar CA, Donnelly KM, Gibori G, Fazleabas AT. Expression of prolactin and its receptor in the baboon uterus during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84:3344–3350[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Camarillo IG, Linebaugh BE, Rillema J. Differential tyrosyl-phosphorylation of multiple mitogen-activated protein kinase isoforms in response to prolactin in Nb2 lymphoma cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1997; 215:198–202[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Smith CL. Cross-talk between peptide growth factor and estrogen receptor signaling pathways. Biol Reprod 1998; 58:627–632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Telleria CM, Zhong L, Deb S, Srivastava RK, Park KS, Sugino N, Park-Sarge O-K, Gibori G. Differential expression of the estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: regulation by prolactin and placental lactogens. Endocrinology 1998; 139:2432–2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Chilton BS, Mani SK, Bullock DW. Servomechanism of prolactin and progesterone in regulating uterine gene expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1988; 2:1169–1175[CrossRef]
  64. Young KH, Kraeling RR, Bazer FW. Effects of prolactin on conceptus survival and uterine secretory activity in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1989; 86:713–722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Kelly MA, Rubinstein M, Asa SL, Zhang G, Saez C, Bunzow JR, Allen RG, Hnasko R, Ben-Jonathan N, Grandy NK, Low MJ. Pituitary lactotroph hyperplasia and chronic hyperprolactinemia in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice. Neuron 1997; 19:103–113[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Spencer TE, Gray CA, Taylor KM, Johnson GA, Gertler A, Gootwine E, Bazer FW. Effects of recombinant ovine interferon tau, placental lactogen and growth hormone on ovine endometrial function. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1409–1418[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Hayashi, A. R O'Connell, J. L Juengel, K. P McNatty, G. H Davis, F. W Bazer, and T. E Spencer
Postnatal uterine development in Inverdale ewe lambs
Reproduction, March 1, 2008; 135(3): 357 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. K Lewis, J. L Farmer, R. C Burghardt, G. R Newton, G. A Johnson, D. L Adelson, F. W Bazer, and T. E Spencer
Galectin 15 (LGALS15): A Gene Uniquely Expressed in the Uteri of Sheep and Goats that Functions in Trophoblast Attachment
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2007; 77(6): 1027 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M G Gnanalingham, P Williams, V Wilson, J Bispham, M A Hyatt, A Pellicano, H Budge, T Stephenson, and M E Symonds
Nutritional manipulation between early to mid-gestation: effects on uncoupling protein-2, glucocorticoid sensitivity, IGF-I receptor and cell proliferation but not apoptosis in the ovine placenta
Reproduction, October 1, 2007; 134(4): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. C. Satterfield, K. A. Dunlap, K. Hayashi, R. C. Burghardt, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Tight and Adherens Junctions in the Ovine Uterus: Differential Regulation by Pregnancy and Progesterone
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3922 - 3931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Hayashi, R. C. Burghardt, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
WNTs in the Ovine Uterus: Potential Regulation of Periimplantation Ovine Conceptus Development
Endocrinology, July 1, 2007; 148(7): 3496 - 3506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. C. Satterfield, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Progesterone Regulation of Preimplantation Conceptus Growth and Galectin 15 (LGALS15) in the Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 289 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hayashi and T. E. Spencer
WNT Pathways in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus: Potential Specification of Endometrial Gland Morphogenesis by SFRP2
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2006; 74(4): 721 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. G. W. Fleming, T. E. Spencer, S. H. Safe, and F. W. Bazer
Estrogen Regulates Transcription of the Ovine Oxytocin Receptor Gene through GC-Rich SP1 Promoter Elements
Endocrinology, February 1, 2006; 147(2): 899 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. Song, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Cathepsins in the Ovine Uterus: Regulation by Pregnancy, Progesterone, and Interferon Tau
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4825 - 4833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hayashi and T. E. Spencer
Estrogen Disruption of Neonatal Ovine Uterine Development: Effects on Gene Expression Assessed by Suppression Subtraction Hybridization
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 752 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Hu and T. E. Spencer
Carbonic Anhydrase Regulate Endometrial Gland Development in the Neonatal Uterus
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 131 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
Y. Yin and L. Ma
Development of the Mammalian Female Reproductive Tract
J. Biochem., June 1, 2005; 137(6): 677 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K. Hayashi, K. D Carpenter, T. H Welsh Jr, R. C Burghardt, L. J Spicer, and T. E Spencer
The IGF system in the neonatal ovine uterus
Reproduction, March 1, 2005; 129(3): 337 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
S Pearce, H Budge, A Mostyn, E Genever, R Webb, P Ingleton, A M Walker, M E Symonds, and T Stephenson
Prolactin, the prolactin receptor and uncoupling protein abundance and function in adipose tissue during development in young sheep
J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 351 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Hayashi, K. D. Carpenter, and T. E. Spencer
Neonatal Estrogen Exposure Disrupts Uterine Development in the Postnatal Sheep
Endocrinology, July 1, 2004; 145(7): 3247 - 3257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Hu, C. A. Gray, and T. E. Spencer
Gene Expression Profiling of Neonatal Mouse Uterine Development
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2004; 70(6): 1870 - 1876.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. E. Spencer and F. W. Bazer
Uterine and placental factors regulating conceptus growth in domestic animals
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E4 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Kwon, G. Wu, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Developmental Changes in Polyamine Levels and Synthesis in the Ovine Conceptus
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2003; 69(5): 1626 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Hayashi, K. D. Carpenter, C. A. Gray, and T. E. Spencer
The Activin-Follistatin System in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 843 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. D. Carpenter, K. Hayashi, and T. E. Spencer
Ovarian Regulation of Endometrial Gland Morphogenesis and Activin-Follistatin System in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 851 - 860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. D. Carpenter, C. A. Gray, T. M. Bryan, T. H. Welsh Jr., and T. E. Spencer
Estrogen and Antiestrogen Effects on Neonatal Ovine Uterine Development
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2003; 69(2): 708 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. D. Carpenter, C. A. Gray, S. Noel, A. Gertler, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Prolactin Regulation of Neonatal Ovine Uterine Gland Morphogenesis
Endocrinology, January 1, 2003; 144(1): 110 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Palmarini, C. A. Gray, K. Carpenter, H. Fan, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Expression of Endogenous Betaretroviruses in the Ovine Uterus: Effects of Neonatal Age, Estrous Cycle, Pregnancy, and Progesterone
J. Virol., December 1, 2001; 75(23): 11319 - 11327.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. Gray, F. F. Bartol, B. J. Tarleton, A. A. Wiley, G. A. Johnson, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Developmental Biology of Uterine Glands
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1311 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. Ka, L. A. Jaeger, G. A. Johnson, T. E. Spencer, and F. W. Bazer
Keratinocyte Growth Factor Is Up-Regulated by Estrogen in the Porcine Uterine Endometrium and Functions in Trophectoderm Cell Proliferation and Differentiation
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2303 - 2310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. Gray, K. M. Taylor, W. S. Ramsey, J. R. Hill, F. W. Bazer, F. F. Bartol, and T. E. Spencer
Endometrial Glands Are Required for Preimplantation Conceptus Elongation and Survival
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2001; 64(6): 1608 - 1613.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. M. Taylor, C. Chen, C. A. Gray, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Expression of Messenger Ribonucleic Acids for Fibroblast Growth Factors 7 and 10, Hepatocyte Growth Factor, and Insulin-Like Growth Factors and Their Receptors in the Neonatal Ovine Uterus
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2001; 64(4): 1236 - 1246.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. A. Gray, F. W. Bazer, and T. E. Spencer
Effects of Neonatal Progestin Exposure on Female Reproductive Tract Structure and Function in the Adult Ewe
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 797 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Spencer, T. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS