Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.
Biology of Reproduction 64, 935-945 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Identification, Cloning, and Initial Characterization of a Novel Mouse Testicular Germ Cell-Specific Antigen1

Atsuko Kurita3,a,b, Toshihiro Takizawa3,c, Takeshi Takayamac,d, Kiyoshi Totsukawab, Shigeki Matsubarad, Hiroaki Shibaharad, Marie-Claire Orgebin-Criste, Fujiro Sendoa, Yoichi Shinkaif, and Yoshihiko Araki2,a,e

a Department of Immunology & Parasitology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan b Section of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, Tsuruoka 997-8555, Japan c Departments of Anatomy and d Obstetrics & Gynecology, Jichi Medical School, Tochigi 329-0498, Japan e Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Biology Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2633 f Department of Cell Biology, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan

ABSTRACT

A monoclonal antibody, designated TES101, was raised by immunizing BALB/c mice with an allogenic mouse testicular homogenate followed by immunohistochemical selection as the initial screening method. By searching the expressed sequence tag (EST) database with the N-terminal amino acid sequence of TES101 reactive protein, we found that the predicted amino acid sequence encoded by a mouse testicular EST clone matched the TES101 protein sequence. Sequence analysis of the clone revealed no homologous molecule in the DNA/protein database. Based on data obtained from N-terminal amino acid analysis of the TES101 protein, the derived amino acid sequence contained a signal peptide region of 25 amino acids and a mature protein region of 225 amino acids, which translated into a protein with a molecular weight of 24 093. Northern blot analysis showed that mRNA of the TES101 protein was found in testis but not in any other mouse tissues examined. Western blot analysis revealed that TES101 reacted with a 38-kDa band on SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, and this reactivity was abrogated under reducing conditions. Immunoelectron microscopic studies demonstrated that the molecule was predominantly located on the plasma membrane of spermatocytes and spermatids but not in Sertoli cells or interstitial cells, including Leydig cells. Thus, the TES101 protein is a novel molecule present primarily on the surface of developing male germ cells. TES101 protein may play a role in the processes underlying male germ cell formation.

spermatid, spermatocyte, spermatogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Spermatozoa form through a series of complex processes in the testis. The cell-to-cell interactions among the testicular cells and the microenvironment created by the endocrine and/or paracrine systems are thought to be important in accomplishing spermatogenesis [1]. Although mammalian spermatozoa acquire the ability to fertilize as they transverse through the epididymis in vivo [24], spermatogenesis itself occurs within the testicular seminiferous tubules [1]. Spermatogenesis, i.e., mitotic proliferation of spermatogonia, meiotic prophase, and division of spermatocytes as well as morphological alterations from haploid spermatids to mature sperm, results in the production of a cell that is highly specialized in structure and function. No other cell achieves such extreme morphological changes while undergoing both genetic recombination and a reduction in chromosome ploidy. Generally, it is believed that the testis has a unique mechanism to control spermatogenesis whereby certain molecules are activated and others are repressed during germ cell production.

To understand the molecular mechanisms regulating germ cell formation, it is important to investigate stage- and/or cell-specific molecular expression within the testis. Thus, several testicular molecules have been identified and characterized (for review, see Hecht [5]) utilizing different approaches. For example, molecular biological techniques, such as the generation of cDNA libraries using subtractive hybridization cDNAs or mRNA differential display procedures, have been used to identify the testis-specific molecules [611]. An alternative approach has been the production of testis-specific antibodies as an initial step in the characterization of testis-specific molecule(s). There are several reports to date concerning the generation of the antibodies specific for testicular germ cell antigens [1218], although these procedures can be a lengthy in some cases. These specific antibodies could be used to characterize the antigen and may be helpful for designing experiments to uncover the role of these testicular antigens in the process of germ cell formation.

We are currently identifying mouse stage/cell-specific testicular antigen(s) to study the spermatogenetic process in more detail. Initially, we chose to produce monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against testicular cells and to utilize immunohistochemical selection as a screening strategy. Data obtained by N-terminal amino acid analysis after immunoprecipitation using the mAbs established that one of the antibodies, designated TES101, reacted with a novel testicular protein as determined by searching the Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) database. Here, we report the molecular cloning and partial characterization of this testicular protein, which is primarily expressed in germ cells from spermatocytes to elongated spermatids in mice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and Chemicals

Female/male ddy and BALB/c mice (6–8 wk old) were purchased from Japan SLC Inc. (Hamamatsu, Japan) and given free access to food and water. They were maintained and bred at the Animal Center, Yamagata University School of Medicine, under 12L:12D conditions.

Restriction endonucleases and modifying enzymes were purchased from either Roche Diagnostics Corp. (Indianapolis, IN) or Takara Shuzo Co. (Kyoto, Japan). Ultrapure grade chemicals were from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan), Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan), Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO), Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA), and Merck Co. (Darmstadt, Germany). The Taq dye primer cycle sequencing kit was from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Ten-nanometer colloidal gold particles were prepared by the tannic acid/citrate method and then conjugated with affinity purified goat anti-mouse IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC) according to the method described by Slot and Geuze [19]. All other chemicals were obtained commercially and were of the highest purity available.

Production of mAb

Preparation of immunizing antigen Two testes from a sexually mature (>8 wk old) ddy mouse were homogenized in 2 ml of PBS (pH 7.4) using a glass homogenizer, and the homogenate was allowed to stand for 1 min. The cell suspension, without tissue debris, was carefully transferred into a 1.5-ml tube and centrifuged for 5 min at 180 x g. The supernatant was then removed by aspiration. After washing with PBS, the cell suspension was divided into three equal parts, and each of the parts was used separately as immunizing antigen.

Immunization and cell fusion The testicular cells, mixed with an equal volume of complete Freund adjuvant (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI), were injected subcutaneously into female BALB/c mice (7–8 wk old). One week after the initial injection, three s.c. booster injections of the testicular cells with incomplete Freund adjuvant (Difco) were administered every other week. Four additional i.p. booster injections of the testicular cell suspension alone were carried out every 2 wk. The spleen was removed 4 days after the last immunization and was used for hybridoma production using a standard procedure as described previously [2022]

Screening and cloning of antibody-producing cells Screening was carried out using an immunohistochemical method. Freshly isolated mouse testis or other organs were fixed with 0.2% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4°C for 2 h, then the tissue was treated overnight with acrylamide monomer solution (PBS, pH 7.0 containing 8.4% acrylamide, 0.014% N,N'-methylene-bis acrylamide and 0.7% N,N,N',N'-tetra methylethylenediamine) at 4°C according to the method described by Hausen and Dreyer [23]. After the treatment, the acrylamide solution was polymerized by the addition of ammonium persulfate solution for tissue embedment and then frozen with liquid nitrogen for preparation of cryosections. Cryosections were treated with 1% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 5 min and then with 70% methanol for 1 min to abolish endogenous peroxidase activity. After washing in PBS with three changes, the sections were covered with 3% BSA in PBS for 1 h at 37°C. The sections were drained and incubated for 30 min in a humid chamber at room temperature with supernatants from the hybrydomas as the first antibody and biotin-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) as the secondary antibody. Immunoreactivity was visualized using a Vectastain peroxidase-ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) with 3',3'-diaminobenzidine·4HCl as substrate. The antibody-producing hybridoma clone obtained was recloned twice by the dilution planting technique as previously described [2022]. Isotyping of mAbs was determined using a mouse hybridoma isotyping kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The IgG class of mAb was purified as described previously [21].

Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analysis

Mouse testicular extracts were prepared as described previously [24] with slight modification. Mouse testis was homogenized with nine volumes of PBS (pH 7.2) containing 1 mM EDTA, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 µg/ml pepstatin. After sonication, the protein solution was centrifuged and the supernatant was used as the water-soluble fraction. The precipitated material was washed three times with phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.5 M NaCl. After washing, the precipitate was resuspended in PBS containing 1% Triton X-100. After mixing several times by pipetting, the suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was used as the Triton X-100-soluble membrane fraction. The insoluble material was washed and centrifuged as described above, dissolved in 0.1% SDS solution, and used as the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction. The protein concentration of each solution was determined by the Bio-Rad microprotein assay, using BSA as the standard. The protein solutions obtained from mouse testis were separated by the SDS-PAGE system of Laemmli [25] under reducing or nonreducing conditions. The molecular mass of the antigen bound by the mAb was determined by enzyme immunostaining of the protein after blotting to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) from the SDS-PAGE gel according to the standard method as described previously [22, 24, 26].

Amino Acid Sequence Analysis

The water-soluble or the Triton X-100-soluble testicular fraction was immunoprecipitated with TES101 antibody coupled to protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech UK, Buckinghamshire, UK) beads. After washing several times with phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 0.5 M NaCl, the beads were boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer (without ß-mercaptoethanol). The solubilized proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE. The bands corresponding to the TES101 reactive antigen were excised and extracted in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) containing 0.1% SDS and then subjected to automated Edman degradation on a protein sequencer (model G1000A; Hewlett Packard, Boise, ID) equipped with an HP1090M on-line analyzer. Chromatographic data were collected and analyzed using a Vectra computer system (Hewlett Packard) as described elsewhere [27].

DNA Sequence Analysis

By screening the mouse EST database, an EST sequence (GenBank accession number AA066084) corresponding to the protein reactive with the TES101 mAb was identified. The EST cDNA clone 514549, subcloned into the EcoRI/XhoI site of the pBluescript II SK(-) vector, was obtained from Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). The entire cDNA sequence of both strands was determined by the dideoxynucleotide termination method [28] using fluorescence-labeled primers (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer's protocol. DNA sequence analysis, protein secondary structure prediction, amino acid sequence, and homology searches were performed as previously described [27, 2931]. Searches for protein sequence motifs were carried out using the PROSITE database [32].

Northern Blot Analysis

Total RNA from various mouse tissues was prepared as described previously [29]. The RNAs (5 µg of each sample) were separated by 1% agarose/formaldehyde gel electrophoresis, transblotted to a positively charged nylon membrane (Hybond-N+; Amersham Pharmacia) by capillary blotting, and hybridized with the 32P-labeled TES101 cDNA probe. Following two washes in double strength standard saline citrate containing 0.1% SDS at 68°C, the blot was visualized using autoradiography.

Immunohistochemical Studies

Immunofluorescence microscopy The testes from adult (14 wk old) BALB/c mice were fixed in a mixture of 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde in 100 mM sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 5% sucrose for 2 h at 22°C. After washing with the same buffer, the samples were embedded in Jung tissue freezing medium (Nuccloch, Germany). Immunofluorescent localization of TES101 was determined on 6- to 8-µm-thick cryostat sections. The sections were incubated with the TES101 mAb (8–16 µg/ml) for 1.5 h at 22°C. The secondary antibody employed was either Alexa Fluor 594-labeled (5–10 µg/ml) or fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (33 µg/ml) (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The sections were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes). Immunostained samples were examined with a fluorescence microscope equipped with a Provis AX80TR (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Control sections received the same treatment, with the exception that the primary antibody was either omitted or replaced with purified nonimmune mouse IgG.

Immunoelectron microscopy The testes from adult BALB/c mice were fixed using the same conditions as in the immunofluorescence microscopic study. After washing in the same buffer as described above, the samples were infiltrated with 2.3 M sucrose, cut as ultrathin cryosections, and then collected on formvar film-coated electron microscopy grids as previously described [3335]. Cryosections mounted on these grids were incubated for 30 min at 22°C in a solution containing 1% BSA and 10% normal goat serum in 20 mM glycine-PBS to block nonspecific protein-binding sites. The grids were incubated with the TES101 mAb (8–16 µg/ml) for 1.5 h at 22°C. Sites of TES101 binding were detected with goat anti-mouse 10-nm colloidal gold particles (A520 was 0.479) or goat anti-mouse FluoroNanogold probes (8 µg Fab/ml) (Nanoprobes, Stony Brook, NY) for 1.5 h at 22°C and then rendered visible with the silver enhancement procedure developed by Burry and coworkers (for review, see Burry [36]) as reported previously [34, 35]. Control grids were incubated in the absence of the primary antibody or in nonimmune IgG. After silver enhancement, the ultrathin cryosections were refixed with 2% glutaraldehyde-PBS, washed in distilled water, negatively stained with aqueous 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 7.0), simultaneously covered with a small square of thin formvar film by the method of Sakai et al. [37], and examined on an H-7000 electron microscope (Hitachi, Hitachinaka, Japan) operated at 100 kV.

RESULTS

TES101 mAb-Reactive Molecule Is a Novel Testicular Protein

A total of 12 hybridomas secreting mAbs (TES101–112) against mouse testicular molecules were established. Among the 12 antibodies, we found that one, designated TES101 (IgG1, {kappa} light chain), recognized a novel testicular protein, based on data obtained from micro amino acid analysis after immunoprecipitation with the TES101 mAb. The N-terminal amino acid sequence of the TES101 reactive protein was determined to be XXXQVSQTLSLEDDPGRTF. A SWISSPLOT database search of the amino acid terminal sequence indicated that no significant match was found. By searching the EST database, we identified a mouse testis cDNA clone (GenBank accession number AA066084, clone ID514549) that had 100% sequence identity with that of the N-terminal sequence of the TES101 protein. We obtained EST clone 514549 and determined the entire nucleotide sequence of the insert. Sequence analysis of the insert revealed a cDNA of 1078 base pairs, containing an open reading flame encoding a putative protein of 250 amino acids, 5' and 3' untranslated regions and a stop codon (TGA), and a polyadenylation signal (AATAAA) with a poly(A)+ tail (Fig. 1). Nucleotide sequence analysis of the cDNA revealed no homologous molecules in the DNA database. Hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity plot analysis using the procedure reported by Kyte and Doolittle [38] revealed strong hydrophobicity at both the N- and C-terminal portions of TES101 protein (Fig. 2). According to micro amino acid sequence analysis, the N-terminus of the molecule appeared to be Thr-26. The calculated molecular weight of the predicted mature TES101 protein core (from Thr-26 to Pro-250) is 24093 and the isoelectric point is 5.25. It contains 4 potential N-glycosylation sites (Asn-Xaa-Ser/Thr) as well as several (>40) Ser/Thr residues, which could be possible O-glycosylation sites (Fig. 1).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Nucleotide sequence of the TES101 protein and its derived amino acid sequence. The stop codon at nucleotides 889–891 is indicated by an asterisk, and the polyadenylation signal at nucleotides 1032–1037 is double underlined. The vertical arrow between Asn-25 and Thr-26 indicates the putative site of signal peptide cleavage. The amino acid sequence identified by micro amino acid analysis is shaded. The potential N-glycosylation sites are indicated by closed circles. The nucleotide sequence of the TES101 protein has been submitted to the GenBank/EMBL and DDBJ data banks under accession number AB022914



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Hydropathy plot of the TES101 protein. The hydropathy plot of the derived amino acid sequence was computed with the GENETYX-MAC program (version 9.0, Software Corp., Tokyo, Japan) using the Kyte-Doolittle algorithm [38] with a window of 10 amino acids. Phob, hydrophobic; phil, hydrophilic

Immunoreactivity of the TES101 mAb Analyzed by Western Blotting

Mouse testicular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, transblotted to a PVDF membrane, and probed using the TES101 mAb (Fig. 3). The immunoreactivity migrated at an apparent molecular mass of 38 kDa as a distinct single band under nonreducing conditions, whereas the reactivity was abrogated under reducing conditions (Fig. 3A). Attempts were also made to identify the TES101 subcellular localization within the testis. Because the total amount of protein was nearly identical in both the water-soluble and the Triton X-100-soluble fractions, an equal amount (5 µg) of total protein from each fraction was analyzed by Western blotting. Although TES101 protein was detected in the testicular water-soluble fraction, the major reactivity was observed in the Triton X-100-soluble fraction (Fig. 3A).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Western blot analysis of testicular extracts. Aliquots from each supernatant fraction containing 5 µg of protein were resolved with 12% SDS-PAGE under reducing/nonreducing conditions. After electrophoresis, the proteins were transblotted to a PVDF membrane and detected by immunostaining using the TES101 mAb as a probe. A) Immunostaining pattern of the protein from adult mouse testis. Lanes 1 and 2: the testicular water-soluble fraction separated under reducing (lane 1) or nonreducing (lane 2) conditions; lane 3: Triton X-100-soluble fraction (nonreducing condition); lane 4: Triton X-100-insoluble fraction (nonreducing condition). B) TES101 protein expression during ontogeny. The testicular water-soluble fraction from mice of various ages was separated under nonreducing conditions. Lane 1: Day 7; lane 2: Day 11; lane 3: Day 14; lane 4: Day 20; lane 5: Day 28; lane 6: Day 60

Postnatally, TES101 immunoreactivity was not detected in the testicular extract at Days 7, 11, and 14 but was first observed around Day 20. The testis from a 28-day-old mouse showed levels of protein expression almost identical to those seen in sexually mature mice (Fig. 3B).

Expression of the TES101 Protein

A 1.1-kilobase mRNA encoding the TES101 protein was detected in total RNA isolated from mature mouse testis by Northern blot analysis. This transcript was not detected in total RNA isolated from mouse heart, spleen, brain, kidney, intestine, liver, lung, skeletal muscle, lymph node, thymus, or stomach. In addition, detectable message for the TES101 protein was not expressed in other reproductive organs, such as the epididymis or the ovary (Fig. 4).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Northern blot analysis of mouse tissues. A) Total RNA (5 µg) from tissue samples was prepared, electrophoresed, transblotted to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with a 32P-labeled DNA probe prepared from the TES101 protein cDNA. Lane 1: heart; lane 2: testis; lane 3: spleen; lane 4: brain; lane 5: kidney; lane 6: intestine; lane 7: liver; lane 8: lung; lane 9: skeletal muscle; lane 10: lymph node; lane 11: thymus; lane 12: stomach; lane 13: epididymis; lane 14: ovary. B) Ethidium bromide staining of 18S and 28S RNA for the samples shown in A

Strong immunoreactivity for the TES101 protein was detected in the testis (Fig. 5A), with only weak staining of spermatozoa within the epididymis (data not shown). No antigen-positive cells were detected in other adult mouse tissues examined (epididymal cells, brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, stomach, intestine, and ovary; data not shown) in agreement with the results of the Northern blot analysis.



View larger version (157K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunofluorescence microscopic observation within mouse seminiferous tubules with the TES101 mAb. Low magnification fluorescent image of TES101 localization (red) (A) and its differential interference contrast (DIC) image (B). Arrowheads indicate stromal cells, including the Leydig cells. Roman numerals indicate the stage of spermatogenesis in each seminiferous tubule. Higher magnification of fluorescence image of TES101 localization (red) in stage V (C) and stage X (E) seminiferous tubules with Hoechst 33342 counterstaining (blue) and their respective DIC images (D, F). Spermatogonia (arrows) and Sertoli cells (small arrowheads) are TES101 negative, and spermatocytes and more advanced cells are TES101 positive. Leptotene (L), zygotene (Z), and pachytene (P) spermatocytes are evident. Green lines in D and F indicate the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubules. Bar = 200 µm (B); bar = 20 µm (F).

Immunofluorescent staining revealed that the TES101 mAb reacted primarily with cells in the seminiferous tubules and did not react with cells in the interstitial tissues, including the Leydig cells (Fig. 5A). To determine the stage of the seminiferous epithelium cycle during spermatogenesis, nuclear staining with Hoechst 33342 was carried out simultaneously with TES101 immunostaining. The intensity of TES101 immunofluorescence observed in the various stages of the seminiferous epithelium was almost identical (Fig. 5, A and B); however, it appeared to be dependent on the cell types in the seminiferous tubules. Spermatogonia attached to the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubules showed negative to faintly positive staining compared with the more advanced cells (stage V, Fig. 5C), whereas the TES101-positive cells attached to the basal lamina were leptotene or zygotene spermatocytes (stage X, Fig. 5E). Sertoli cells seemed to be TES101 negative at all stages (Fig. 5, C and E). These observations suggest that although all stages of seminiferous tubules are TES101 positive, positive staining appears to be associated with spermatocytes and more advanced cells but not with spermatogonia or Sertoli cells. Control preparations in which the primary antibody was omitted or replaced by nonimmune IgG did not show appreciable immunofluorescence (data not shown).

Immunoelectron Microscopic Localization of TES101 Protein in the Mouse Testis

To elucidate the subcellular localization of TES101 protein more precisely, immunoelectron microscopic studies were carried out. In agreement with the immunohistochemical data using light microscopy, immunogold particles were primarily found in spermatocytes and spermatids. Almost no labeling was seen on the cell surface or in the cytoplasm of the spermatogonia (Fig. 6). In the spermatocytes, strong immunoreactivity was observed on the surface of the cells (Fig. 7, A and B). In comparison, relatively weak reaction was observed in the Golgi area (Fig. 7B), although the Golgi area in some spermatocytes showed no immunoreactivity (data not shown). The cytoplasm of round spermatids was not labeled; however, the labeling intensity at the cell membrane was similar to that observed in spermatocytes (Fig. 8). In the elongated spermatids, strong immunoreactivity was present on the surface of spermatids and residual bodies and on the surface of the middle, principal, and end pieces of the flagellum (Fig. 9). Few gold particles were seen on the head portion of elongated spermatids that were attached to Sertoli cells (Fig. 10). In addition, the surface of the Sertoli cells was almost devoid of gold particles (Fig. 10). Control specimens, where TES101 was replaced by PBS or nonimmune IgG, were negative for gold labeling (data not shown).



View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. TES101 immunoreactivity in spermatogonia (sg, spermatogonia; n, nucleus of spermatogonia). The arrowhead shows the basal lamina of the seminiferous tubule, and the small arrows indicate the cell membrane of the spermatogonia. Note the lack of immunoreactivity in the spermatogonia. Bar = 1 µm



View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7. TES101 immunoreactivity in spermatocytes. A) The small arrows indicate cell surface membranes of the spermatocytes, and the Golgi area is indicated by an asterisk (sc, spermatocyte; n, nucleus of spermatocyte). Bar = 1 µm. B) Immunogold distribution in Golgi apparatus at higher magnification. The arrowheads indicate immunogold particles in the Golgi apparatus. Bar = 0.5 µm



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8. TES101 immunoreactivity in round spermatids (st, spermatid; n, nucleus of spermatid). The small arrows show the cell membrane of spermatids. Arrowheads indicate acrosomes; acrosomal vesicles are represented by asterisks. Note the lack of immunoreactivity in the Golgi area of the cells. Bars = 1 µm



View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 9. TES101 immunoreactivity in elongated spermatids (st, spermatid; n, nucleus of spermatid; rc, residual cytoplasm). The large arrows and small double arrows indicate transverse sections of the middle and principal pieces of a flagellum, respectively. Transverse sections of the late principal end piece are shown by arrowheads. Asterisks demonstrate the head portion of late spermatids and spermatozoa. Bars = 1 µm



View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 10. TES101 immunoreactivity in Sertoli cells (se, Sertoli cell; st, head portion of an elongated spermatid). Arrowheads indicate the cell surface membrane of Sertoli cells. The plasma membrane of spermatids are shown by small arrows. Note the lack of immunoreactivity on the surface of the Sertoli cell and few gold particles at the head portion of the elongate spermatids that attached to the Sertoli cells. Bars = 1 µm

DISCUSSION

In this study, we identified a novel testicular germ cell-specific protein (TES101 protein), partially characterized its biochemical properties, and determined its testicular localization. Western blot analysis demonstrated that the TES101 mAb can only react with the antigen under nonreducing conditions, suggesting that the antigenic determinant is toward a domain that contains a disulfide bond(s). The TES101 protein may be hydrophilic; it is present in the testicular water-soluble fraction (Fig. 3). However, the major reactivity is found in the Triton X-100-soluble fraction (Fig. 3A), implying that the protein strongly associates with the membrane portion of the testicular cells after biosynthesis. The immunoelectron microscopic study demonstrated that the TES101 protein is located mainly on the plasma membrane of spermatocytes and spermatids and is weakly present in the Golgi area of the spermatocytes (Figs. 6–10). Alternatively, the TES101 protein may have two forms, i.e., a cytosolic form and a glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored form. The hydropathy plot analysis (Fig. 2) revealed two putative signal sequences at both the N- and C-terminals of the molecule, typically found in the GPI-anchored proteins [3941].

Based on the sliding window/matrix scoring method and the -1, -3 rule for predicting a signal sequence cleavage site [42, 43], the amino acid position between Val-23 and Gln-24 was suggested to predict a site sensitive to cleavage by signal peptidase; however, the actual N-terminus of the molecule appeared to be Thr-26. At present, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that the difference comes from minor degradation during the isolation of the TES101 protein by immunoprecipitation. After removal of the putative 25-amino acid signal peptide at the N-terminus, the molecular mass of the mature form of the TES101 protein (225 amino acids) was 24 kDa, as calculated from the predicted amino acid sequence. However, Western blot analysis showed that TES101 protein had a molecular mass of 38 kDa under nonreducing conditions (Fig. 3). Presumably, this relatively large difference in the molecular mass might be due to glycosylation of the peptide. Four potential N-glycosylation sites and several possible O-glycosylation sites (Ser/Thr residues) were found in the deduced amino acid sequence of the TES101 protein (Fig. 1). Preliminary experiments were carried out to deglycosylate the protein using either N-glycanase, an enzyme known to cleave all types of N-linked oligosaccharide chains [44], or mild alkaline hydrolysis (ß-elimination), a chemical reaction known to be rather specific for O-linked oligosaccharide chains. However, no significant reduction in the size of the TES101 protein was detected by Western blot analysis under nonreducing conditions when either deglycosylation method was utilized (unpublished data). Our preliminary data suggested that another type of posttranslational processing might have occurred on the TES101 protein. In the case of glycoprotein deglycosylation, however, it is generally recommended to denature the molecule before the treatment using SDS and sulfydryl reagents such as ß-mercaptoethanol for complete deglycosylation. In addition, glycoproteins differ widely in their susceptibility to deglycosylation, so that specific conditions including denaturing conditions must be established in each case [44]. The results at this time are inconclusive because the TES101 mAb lacked immunoreactivity under reducing conditions (Fig. 3A); therefore, we could not use sulfydryl reagents for denaturing of the protein during deglycosylation procedure. Further biochemical studies will be necessary to clarify this issue.

Testis-specific mRNA expression (Fig. 4) and the results of the immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopic studies (Figs. 5–10) strongly suggest that the TES101 protein was expressed predominantly in testicular germ cells. Although immunofluorescence microscopic studies (Fig. 5) showed that the molecule is detected on the surface of spermatocytes to spermatozoa in all stages of seminiferous tubules, the immunoreactivity of TES101 in the Golgi area of spermatocytes was not always detectable (Fig. 7), suggesting that the TES101 protein might be produced at a specific stage of spermatogenesis. To identify the TES101 protein-producing cells and the stages of spermatogenesis at which it is produced will require further studies, including in situ hybridization and immunoelectron microscopic studies on the expression of the protein during various stages of spermatogenesis. Such studies are underway in our laboratories.

In mice, the first 3 wk of life are classified as the neonatal period [45, 46]. Testicular growth due to an increase in germ cell numbers during the expansion of spermatogenesis occurs from Day 10 to Day 60 after birth, and puberty occurs between 40 and 55 days of age [45]. Although some individual differences were noticed in the expression level of TES101 protein, detectable expression of the molecule in the testis seemed to start approximately 20 days after birth (Fig. 3B). An early study by Bellve et al. [46] indicated that pachytene spermatocytes were identified at 14 days of age and secondary spermatocytes and round spermatids were first observed at 18 days of age within the seminiferous tubules in mice. Because the expression of the TES101 protein is almost parallel to testicular growth, the molecule may have a significant physiological role in sperm formation. The immunohistochemical studies clearly demonstrate that the TES101 protein is primarily restricted to the spermatocytes and spermatids within the seminiferous tubules, suggesting that the protein may be involved with the process of spermatogenesis.

We have identified, cloned, and partially characterized a novel germ cell-specific protein that is primarily detected on the cell surface of spermatocytes and spermatids in the testis. Although the physiological function of the TES101 protein is unknown, these preliminary findings suggest that this novel protein is expressed during spermatogenesis and may be involved in sperm formation.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are deeply indebted to Drs. Keiji Mori (Yamagata University) and Kazuhiko Akatsuka (Nanyo City Hospital) for their technical support. We are grateful to Drs. Benjamin J. Danzo and Susan Kasper (Vanderbilt University) for critically reading the manuscript. The excellent secretarial assistance of Mrs. Loreita Little is gratefully acknowledged.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 19 June 2000.

1 This work was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for General Scientific Research 11671593 and by project grants from the Center for Molecular Medicine of Jichi Medical School and the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan. Back

2 Correspondence: Yoshihiko Araki, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Biology Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 21st Avenue South, Room U3305, Medical Center North, Nashville, TN 37232-2633. FAX: 615 343 7797; yoshihiko.araki{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu Back

3 The authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Accepted: October 23, 2000.

Received: May 17, 2000.

REFERENCES

  1. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Shnha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Mammalian spermatogenesis. In: Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, ID: Cache River Press; 1990: 1–40
  2. Orgebin-Crist MC, Olson GE, Danzo BJ. Factor influencing maturation of spermatozoa in the epididymis. In: Franchimont P, Channing CP (eds.), Intragonadal Regulation of Reproduction. London: Academic Press; 1981: 393–417
  3. Orgebin-Crist MC. Androgens and epididymal function. In: Bhasin S, Gabeluick HL, Spieler JM, Swerdlott RS, Wang C (eds.), Pharmacology, Biology, and Clinical Application of Androgens. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1996: 27–38
  4. Orgebin-Crist MC. The epididymis across 24 centuries. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1998; 53:285–292[Medline]
  5. Hecht NB. Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioessays 1998; 20:555–561[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Tanaka H, Yoshimura Y, Nishina Y, Nozaki M, Nojima H, Nishimune Y. Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones specifically expressed in testicular germ cells. FEBS Lett 1994; 355:4–10[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lopez-Alanon DM, del Mazo J. Cloning and characterization of genes expressed during gametogenesis of female and male mice. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 103:323–329[Abstract]
  8. Yuan L, Liu JG, Hoog C. Rapid cDNA sequencing in combination with RNA expression studies in mice identifies a large number of male germ cell-specific sequence tags. Biol Reprod 1995; 52:131–138[Abstract]
  9. Fujii T, Tamura K, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Yomogida K, Tanaka H, Nishimune Y, Nojima H, Abiko Y. Sperizin is a murine RING zinc-finger protein specifically expressed in haploid germ cells. Genomics 1999; 57:94–101[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Iguchi N, Tanaka H, Fujii T, Tamura K, Kaneko Y, Nojima H, Nishimune Y. Molecular cloning of haploid germ cell-specific tektin cDNA and analysis of the protein in mouse testis. FEBS Lett 1999; 456:315–321[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Tanaka H, Yoshimura Y, Nozaki M, Yomogida K, Tsuchida J, Tosaka Y, Habu T, Nakanishi T, Okada M, Nojima H, Nishimune Y. Identification and characterization of a haploid germ cell-specific nuclear protein kinase (haspin) in spermatid nuclei and its effects on somatic cells. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:17049–17057[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Watanabe D, Sawada K, Koshimizu U, Kagawa T, Nishimune Y. Characterization of male meiotic germ cell-specific antigen (Meg 1) by monoclonal antibody TRA 369 in mice. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 33:307–312[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Lemaire L, Senftleben A, Heinlein UA. Characterization by enriched polyclonal antibodies of developmentally regulated and cell type specific mouse testis antigens. Life Sci 1992; 51:439–448[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Koshimizu U, Watanabe D, Sawada K, Nishimune Y. A novel stage-specific differentiation antigen is expressed on mouse testicular germ cells during early meiotic prophase. Biol Reprod 1993; 49:875–884[Abstract]
  15. Enders GC, May II JJ. Developmentally regulated expression of a mouse germ cell nuclear antigen examined from embryonic day 11 to adult in male and female mice. Dev Biol 1994; 163:331–340[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Koshimizu U, Nishioka H, Watanabe D, Dohmae K, Nishimune Y. Characterization of a novel spermatogenic cell antigen specific for early stages of germ cells in mouse testis. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40:221–227[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Tsuchida J, Nishina Y, Akamatsu T, Nishimune Y. Characterization of development-specific, cell type-specific mouse testicular antigens using testis-specific polyclonal antibodies. Int J Androl 1995; 18:208–212[Medline]
  18. Tanaka H, Pereira LA, Nozaki M, Tsuchida J, Sawada K, Mori H, Nishimune Y. A germ cell-specific nuclear antigen recognized by a monoclonal antibody raised against mouse testicular germ cells. Int J Androl 1997; 20:361–366[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Slot JW, Geuze HJ. A new method of preparing gold probes for multi-labeling cytochemistry. Eur J Cell Biol 1985; 38:87–93[Medline]
  20. Araki Y, Kurata S, Oikawa T, Yamashita T, Hiroi M, Naiki M, Sendo F. A monoclonal antibody reacting with the zona pellucida of oviductal egg but not with that of the ovarian egg of the golden hamster. J Reprod Immunol 1987; 11:193–208[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Araki Y, Ikebe M. Activation of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase activity by a monoclonal antibody which recognizes the calmodulin-binding region. Biochem J 1991; 275:679–684
  22. Chen L, Gao P, Yamashita T, Nara T, Kojima S, Sendo F, Araki Y. Molecular cloning and expression of a Schistosoma japonicum tegment membrane-associated antigen from Japanese strain. Parasitol Int 1998; 47:289–300
  23. Hausen P, Dreyer C. The use of polyacrylamide as an embedding medium for immunohistochemical studies of embryonic tissues. Stain Technol 1981; 56:287–293[Medline]
  24. Araki Y, Vierula ME, Rankin TL, Tulsiani DR, Orgebin-Crist MC. Isolation and characterization of a 25-kilodalton protein from mouse testis: sequence homology with a phospholipid-binding protein. Biol Reprod 1992; 47:832–843[Abstract]
  25. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970; 227:680–685[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Yu Y, Araki Y, Sendo F. Tyrosine phosphorylation of a 34-kDa protein induced by crosslinking of a novel glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein (GPI-80) on human neutrophils that may regulate their adherence and migration. IUBMB Life 2000; 49:43–47[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Akatsuka K, Yoshida-Komiya H, Tulsiani DRP, Orgebin-Crist MC, Hiroi M, Araki Y. Rat zona pellucida glycoproteins: molecular cloning and characterization of the three major components. Mol Reprod Dev 1998; 51:454–467[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors. Proc Natl Acid Sci U S A 1977; 74:5463–5467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sendai Y, Komiya H, Suzuki K, Onuma T, Kikuchi M, Hoshi H, Araki Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of a mouse oviduct-specific glycoprotein. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:285–294[Abstract]
  30. Suzuki K, Sendai Y, Onuma T, Hoshi H, Hiroi M, Araki Y. Molecular characterization of a hamster oviduct-specific glycoprotein. Biol Reprod 1995; 53:345–354[Abstract]
  31. Suzuki K, Watanabe T, Sakurai S, Ohtake K, Kinoshita T, Araki A, Fujita T, Takei H, Takeda Y, Sato Y, Yamashita T, Araki Y, Sendo F. A novel glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored protein on human leukocytes: a possible role for regulation of neutrophil adherence and migration. J Immunol 1999; 162:4277–4284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hofmann K, Bucher P, Falquet L, Bairoch A. The PROSITE database, its status in 1999. Nucleic Acids Res 1999; 27:215–219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Takizawa T, Robinson JM. Composition of the transfer medium is crucial for high-resolution immunocytochemistry of cryosectioned human neutrophils. J Histochem Cytochem 1994; 42:1157–1159[Abstract]
  34. Takizawa T, Robinson JM. Use of 1.4-nm immunogold particles for immunocytochemistry on ultra-thin cryosections. J Histochem Cytochem 1994; 42:1615–1623[Abstract]
  35. Takizawa T, Robinson JM. FluoroNanogold is a bifunctional immunoprobe for correlative fluorescence and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 2000; 48:481–485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Burry RW. Pre-embedding immunocytochemistry with silver enhanced small gold particles. In: Hayat MA (ed.), Immunogold-Silver Staining. Principles, Methods, and Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995: 217–230
  37. Sakai T, Saruwatari T, Fukushima O, Saito T. The covering method: an improved negative staining method for ultrathin cryo-sections of tissue. J Electron Microsc 1995; 44:479–484[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157:105–132[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Yeh ETH, Kamitani T, Chang HM. Biosynthesis and processing of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in mammalian cells. Semin Immunol 1994; 6:73–80[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Udenfriend S, Kodukula K. How glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane proteins are made. Annu Rev Biochem 1995; 64:563–591[Medline]
  41. Kinoshita T, Ohishi K, Takeda J. GPI-anchor synthesis in mammalian cells: genes, their products, and a deficiency. J Biochem 1997; 122:251–257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. von Heijne G. Signal sequences: the limits of variation. J Mol Biol 1985; 184:99–105[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. von Heijne G. A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14:4683–4690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Tarentino AL, Gomez CM, Plummer TH Jr. Deglycosylation of asparagine-linked glycans by peptide: N-glycosidase F. Biochemistry 1985; 24:4665–4671[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Mckinney TD, Desjardins C. Postnatal development of the testis, fighting behavior, and fertility in house mice. Biol Reprod 1973; 9:279–294[Abstract]
  46. Bellve AR, Cavicchia JC, Millette CF, O'Brien DA, Bhatnagar YM, Dym M. Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse: isolation and morphological characterization. J Cell Biol 1977; 74:68–85[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. B. Sleight, P. V. Miranda, N.-W. Plaskett, B. Maier, J. Lysiak, H. Scrable, J. C. Herr, and P. E. Visconti
Isolation and Proteomic Analysis of Mouse Sperm Detergent-Resistant Membrane Fractions: Evidence for Dissociation of Lipid Rafts During Capacitation
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2005; 73(4): 721 - 729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
T. Takayama, T. Mishima, M. Mori, H. Jin, H. Tsukamoto, K. Takahashi, T. Takizawa, K. Kinoshita, M. Suzuki, I. Sato, et al.
Sexually Dimorphic Expression of the Novel Germ Cell Antigen TEX101 During Mouse Gonad Development
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2005; 72(6): 1315 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
P.J.I. Ellis, R.A. Furlong, A. Wilson, S. Morris, D. Carter, G. Oliver, C. Print, P.S. Burgoyne, K.L. Loveland, and N.A. Affara
Modulation of the mouse testis transcriptome during postnatal development and in selected models of male infertility
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 271 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
I. Halova, L. Draberova, and P. Draber
A novel lipid raft-associated glycoprotein, TEC-21, activates rat basophilic leukemia cells independently of the type 1 Fc{varepsilon} receptor
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2002; 14(2): 213 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kurita, A.
Right arrow Articles by Araki, Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS