Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nagano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nagano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nagano, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brinster, R. L.
Biology of Reproduction 64, 1409-1416 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Primate Spermatogonial Stem Cells Colonize Mouse Testes1

Makoto Nagano3,a, John R. McCarreyb, and Ralph L. Brinster2,a

a Department of Animal Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6009 b Department of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research and Southwest Regional Primate Research Center, San Antonio, Texas 78245-0549

ABSTRACT

In mice, transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells from a fertile male to the seminiferous tubules of an infertile recipient male results in progeny with donor-derived haplotype. Attempts to extend this approach by transplanting human testis cells to mice have led to conflicting claims that no donor germ cells persisted or that human spermatozoa were produced in the recipient. To examine this issue we used the baboon, a primate in which testis cell populations of several ages could be obtained for transplantation, and demonstrate that donor spermatogonial stem cells readily establish germ cell colonies in recipient mice, which exist for periods of at least 6 mo. However, differentiation of germ cells toward the lumen of the tubule and production of spermatozoa did not occur. The presence of baboon spermatogonial stem cells and undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse seminiferous tubules for long periods after transplantation indicates that antigens, growth factors, and signaling molecules that are necessary for interaction of these cells and the testis environment have been preserved for 100 million years of evolutionary separation. Because germ cell differentiation and spermatogenesis did not occur, the molecules necessary for this process appear to have undergone greater divergence between baboon and mouse.

Sertoli cells, spermatogenesis, testis

INTRODUCTION

The ability to produce spermatozoa in the adult male depends on the presence of spermatogonial stem cells in the seminiferous tubules of the testis. These cells can both self-renew and produce daughter cells that undergo differentiation. Whereas mature spermatozoa of different species have unusual and distinct morphological appearances [1, 2], the differentiation process that produces these mature forms shares many common characteristics among species. Moreover, the similarities appear greatest during the early stages of spermatogenesis. For example, primitive, undifferentiated spermatogonia are remarkably similar in appearance in many species [35], and spermatogonial stem cells may share important characteristics [6].

A powerful argument for shared biological attributes of stem cells and primitive undifferentiated spermatogonia from different species comes from testis cell transplantation studies in which it has been found that spermatogonial stem cells of many species have the ability to colonize the mouse testis. When rat and hamster testis cells are transplanted to mouse testes, stem cells generate colonies of donor cell-derived spermatogenesis and spermatozoa in recipients [7, 8], and transplanting cells from mouse to rat results in mouse spermatozoa produced in the rat testis [9]. In addition, transplantation of testis cells to the mouse from nonrodent species, such as rabbit, dog, pig, and bull, results in formation of colonies that consist of undifferentiated spermatogonia on the basement membrane of seminiferous tubules, which are maintained for 6 mo or more [10, 11]. However, differentiation of germ cells toward the seminiferous tubule lumen and generation of spermatozoa do not occur. Recently, it was reported that following xenotransplantation of human testis cells to mice no donor germ cells could be identified in recipient seminiferous tubules [12]. In contrast, Sofikitis and colleagues [13] claimed that transplantation of human testis cells to mouse and rat seminiferous tubules resulted in production of spermatozoa in more than 25% of recipients. These divergent results suggest that primate germ cells may be either less or more compatible with the microenvironment of rodent seminiferous tubules than has been demonstrated for germ cells from other nonrodent, nonprimate species. Thus, either a pessimistic or optimistic outlook for medical and research application of xenogeneic spermatogonial transplantation is generated.

In a broad context, the possibility of a biological similarity in spermatogonial stem cell characteristics among mammalian species has fundamental implications regarding the effect of evolutionary divergence on all self-renewing cell systems in the body, such as hematopoietic tissue, epidermis, or intestinal epithelium. Previous testis cell transplantation studies involving nonprimate species suggest considerable similarity among stem cells of many species based on their ability to colonize the mouse testis [711]. In contrast, the inability of nonrodent germ cells to proceed through meiosis and spermiogenesis suggests that these specialized differentiation processes have experienced greater variation or divergence among species over time [10, 11]. The conflicting results from human testis cell transplantation experiments raise questions regarding this general premise arising from nonprimate experiments.

Evidence from human hematopoietic cell transplantation into immunodeficient mice suggests that human hematopoietic progenitor/stem cells colonize mouse hematopoietic organs and show limited differentiation. Administration of species-specific cytokines or cotransplantation of supporting cells from fetal liver, bone, and thymus is necessary to maintain human hematopoietic stem cells and induce multilineage differentiation in mice [1417]. A general evolutionary phenomenon may be that stem cells of individual self-renewing cell systems of the body display minimal divergence in basic biology among species, whereas the differentiation stages show more divergent characteristics. The spermatogonial stem cell transplantation system provides an opportunity to test this hypothesis and has several advantages over other self-renewing systems in this regard. The testis is self-contained and readily accessible; individual stem cell colonization events can be enumerated [1820], the extent and quality of colonies can be measured and evaluated [2123], and terminal differentiation of transplanted cells produces a single cell type, spermatozoa, with an easily assayed and definitive function.

In order to determine whether spermatogonial stem cells of a primate differed from those of nonprimates in their ability to colonize mouse testes, baboon testis cells were transplanted to testes of immunodeficient nude mice and the recipient tubules were analyzed with immunohistochemistry. The baboon was chosen as a model for primates because testis tissue of several ages could be readily obtained without ethical concerns associated with human testis tissue. In addition, the baboon is closely related to humans, necropsy material is more readily available than from chimpanzee or gorilla, and unlike the macaque, the baboon is a nonseasonal breeder. Therefore, the results of transplantation studies could help to clarify the divergent reports from human experiments, and test in primates the concept that spermatogonial stem cells of many species share important biological properties. Following transplantation of baboon germ cells, areas of colonization were found in recipient tubules for at least 6 mo following transplantation, but differentiation of germ cells into the lumen was not seen, and spermatozoa were not produced. The efficiency of colonization of recipient tubules by primate stem cells appeared similar to that previously found for syngeneic transplantation in the mouse.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Donor Cell Preparation

Testis cells were obtained from prepubertal (1-yr-old) and postpubertal (7- and 14-yr-old) baboons (Papio hamadryas anubis) at necropsy. Seminiferous tubules and interstitial tissue were initially mechanically dissected away from connective tissues. Cellular dissociation was accomplished by sequential enzymatic digestions [24, 25]. The seminiferous tubules were digested first with 1 mg/ml collagenase (type II, Worthington Biochemical Corp., Lakewood, NJ) at 33°C for 15–20 min. Resulting seminiferous tubule fragments were recovered by decanting the collagenase solution, then treated with 0.5 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) at 33°C for 15–20 min. DNase I (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 1 mg/ml and the solution was pipetted repeatedly until a minimum viscosity was achieved. The cells were centrifuged at 600 x g at 4°C for 10 min and resuspended in 12.5 ml Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM). The resulting single cell suspension of baboon testis cells was frozen by adding an equal volume (12.5 ml) of freezing media [26]. The cell suspension was aliquotted (1 ml/vial), and each aliquot was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -196°C for 70–866 days. The cell suspensions were prepared at the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research and shipped overnight on dry ice for injection into recipient mice in Philadelphia.

Recipient Mice and Donor Cell Transplantation

Ncr Swiss nude (nu/nu) mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY), 6–8 wk of age, were treated with busulfan (44 mg/kg) at least 4 wk before donor cell transplantation to destroy endogenous spermatogenesis [27, 28]. Frozen baboon testis cells were thawed and resuspended in DMEM, as described previously [26]. Cell viability after thawing was 50.0% ± 2.4% (mean ± standard error of the mean, n = 14) for postpubertal cells and 71.9% ± 0.5 % (n = 3) for prepubertal cells. The concentration of donor cell suspension was 164.7 ± 11.4 x 106 cells/ml for postpubertal cells and 44.3 ± 5.6 x 106 cells/ml for prepubertal cells, and approximately 10 µl of donor cells were introduced into the seminiferous tubules of a testis by injecting the rete testis of the recipient mouse [29]. All animal experimentation protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pennsylvania and the Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research.

Antibody Production

Cells for development of testis- and species-specific antibody were prepared from a 7-yr-old adult baboon as described above. The polyclonal antiserum against baboon testis cells was commercially produced (Covance Research Products, Denver, PA) by immunizing a New Zealand White rabbit [10]. Briefly, 2 x 107 baboon testis cells were injected subcutaneously on the back of the rabbit in Freund complete adjuvant on Day 0. Six booster injections were made with 107 baboon testis cells in Freund incomplete adjuvant 3 wk apart. Serum was prepared 2 wk after the last immunization. The total immunoglobulin G (IgG) fraction was extracted using the EZ-Sep kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), and purified through HiTrap-Q columns (Pharmacia Biotech). Purity of the IgG was verified by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining. Purified IgG was concentrated using CentriPlus spin filters (Amicon, Beverly, MA) and biotinylated by incubation with N-hydroxysucinimidobiotin (EZ-Link NHS-biotin; Pierce, Rockford, IL) in 0.1 M NaHCO3 for 4 h at room temperature followed by extensive dialysis against Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline (D-PBS). Biotinylated IgG was incubated with 2% acetone extract of mouse testis [30] for 4 h at room temperature to reduce nonspecific binding to mouse testis cells.

Analysis

Whole-mount immunohistochemistry using biotinylated rabbit anti-baboon IgG was performed following the protocol of Dobrinski et al. [10]. Recipient mouse seminiferous tubules dispersed with 1 mg/ml collagenase (type IV; Sigma) and 1 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 h at 4°C and washed in D-PBS. Samples were incubated at room temperature with 0.1 M glycine in D-PBS and then 0.3% H2O2 in D-PBS to block endogenous peroxidase activity. Samples were treated at room temperature in D-PBS that contained 2% skim milk and 0.1% Triton X-100 (PBS-MT), followed by incubation in D-PBS containing 5% normal goat serum, 1% BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100. Endogenous biotin was blocked using an avidin/biotin blocking kit (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). Samples were then processed with biotinylated anti-baboon IgG (5 µg/ml) in D-PBS with 5% BSA at 4°C overnight. Samples were washed twice for 30 min at 4°C and once for 30 min at room temperature with PBS-MT. The washing process was completed by incubating samples in D-PBS containing goat serum, BSA, and Triton X-100, described above, twice for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were reacted with Z-avidin coupled to horseradish peroxidase at 1:1000 dilution (Zymed Laboratories) at 4°C overnight. After washing five times at room temperature in 0.1% Triton X-100/D-PBS (15 min each), donor baboon cells were visualized using 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Approximately one-quarter to one-half of a testis was analyzed at a time.

For whole-mount double staining with anti-baboon antibody and rabbit anti-human RNA Binding Motif (RBM) antibody (a gift from D. Elliott), samples were fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C for 2 h followed by sequential incubations in methanol and acetone at -20°C for 30 min each. Using the same blocking and washing procedures described above, samples were incubated with rabbit anti-human RBM polyclonal antibodies [31] and then with goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA), both overnight at 4°C. After extensive washes, samples were processed with biotinylated anti-baboon antibodies as described above. Donor cells were first visualized for RBM using the VECTOR Blue alkaline phosphatase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories), then for baboon-specific antigens with AEC.

Histological sections of adult (7-yr-old) baboon testis were stained to examine the reactivity of anti-human RBM antibodies to baboon germ cells. Paraffin sections of adult baboon testis fixed in Bovin solution were processed as described [31] and cells were visualized using the VECTOR VIP peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories), which produces a purple color on positive cells. Paraffin sections of normal testes were prepared from 1-, 7-, and 14-yr-old baboons and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Statistical analyses were performed with Student t-test or ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD multiple comparisons (Systat 7.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

Donor testis cells were obtained from prepubertal and postpubertal baboons to determine the effect of reproductive status on colonization potential of spermatogonial stem cell. Donor cells were cryopreserved for 70–866 days before transplantation into recipient testes of immunodeficient mice that had been treated with busulfan to destroy endogenous spermatogenesis [27, 28]. Seminiferous tubules of prepubertal baboon testes contained only Sertoli cells and primitive spermatogonia, whereas in the tubules of adult testes, all differentiating germ cell stages were present (Fig. 1).



View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Histological appearance of normal testis of prepubertal (1-yr-old) and postpubertal (7- and 14-yr-old) baboons. Testis of 1-yr-old baboon (a) contains only Sertoli cells (arrows) and spermatogonia (arrowheads) in the seminiferous tubules. In the testes of 7-yr-old (b) and 14-yr-old (c) baboons, all stages of spermatogenesis, from spermatogonia (arrows) to spermatozoa (arrowheads) can be seen in the seminiferous tubules. Hematoxylin-eosin staining. Bar = 30 µm (a) and 75 µm (b and c)

Species-Specificity of Antibodies Raised Against Baboon Testis Cells

Because early stages of male germ cell differentiation have a similar morphological appearance among many species, a baboon testis-specific polyclonal antibody was produced. To verify the specificity of the antibodies to donor baboon germ cells, mouse recipient tubules microinjected with donor cells were double-stained with baboon-specific antibodies and germ cell-specific anti-human RBM antibodies [31]. The RBM antibody cross-reacts well with nuclei of germ cells in baboon testes and is particularly strong in spermatogonia and early stages of germ cell differentiation (Fig. 2c), whereas the antibody does not cross-react with mouse germ cells (Fig. 2d). When recipient seminiferous tubules were treated with both antibodies, germ cells that were stained with RBM antibodies were also positive for baboon-specific antibodies (Fig. 3, a–c). Although baboon fibroblast-like cells and clumps of intraluminal cells also stained with the baboon antibody, these cells were clearly not on the basement membrane (intraluminal cell clumps) or did not have the appearance of germ cells (e.g., fibroblasts). The double-stained cells were always on the basement membrane as isolated single cells and chains of connected cells, which are known to be a typical cellular arrangement of undifferentiated spermatogonia [32]. Therefore, baboon antibodies were subsequently used to identify donor-derived germ cells.



View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Detection of baboon germ cells transplanted into recipient mouse testes using baboon-specific antibodies and germ cell specific anti-human RBM antibodies. a) Whole-mount of recipient mouse seminiferous tubules stained with baboon-specific antibodies 1 day after transplantation of 7-yr-old baboon testis cells. 129Sv x C57BL/6 (129/B6) F1 recipient mouse was pretreated with busulfan to destroy endogenous spermatogenesis [27, 28]. Mouse seminiferous tubules are filled with baboon testis cells, which stain red. b) Intact 129/B6 F1 mouse seminiferous tubules (no busulfan treatment) stained with baboon-specific antibodies. No mouse cells react with the antibodies. c) Immunohistochemistry on a paraffin section of 7-yr-old baboon testis using germ cell-specific anti-human RBM antibodies [31]. Anti-RBM antibodies specifically react with baboon germ cell nuclei (purple stain), particularly in spermatogonia on the basement membrane and in spermatocytes. d) Immunohistochemistry on a paraffin section of intact 129/B6 F1 mouse testis using anti-human RBM antibodies. No positive signals were observed. Bar = 100 µm (a and b) and 40 µm (c and d)



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Donor baboon germ cells in mouse seminiferous tubules. a) Baboon-specific antibodies clearly identify baboon germ cells in seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated nude mouse. Donor cells were from 7-yr-old baboon, and tubules were analyzed 3 mo after transplantation. Donor baboon germ cells were visualized with horseradish peroxidase (red) and are found on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubule. Short chains of connected cells, which are typical of primitive spermatogonia, can be observed. b) Whole-mount staining of transplanted baboon germ cells with germ cell-specific anti-human RBM antibodies. Donor cells were visualized with alkaline phosphatase (blue), which stains the nuclei of baboon germ cells. Donor cells were from 7-yr-old baboon and tubules of busulfan-treated nude mouse were analyzed 3 mo after transplantation. c) Whole-mount double-staining of donor baboon cells with anti-RBM and anti-baboon antibodies 3 mo after transplantation into seminiferous tubules of busulfan-treated nude mouse. Visualization of donor cells by anti-RBM antibody was with alkaline phosphatase reaction (blue), and that by anti-baboon antibody with horseradish peroxidase reaction (red). Cytoplasmic staining is red and nuclear staining is dark brown (arrows, compare with a) due to double-staining with red and blue reaction products, indicating that baboon-specific antibodies clearly identify donor baboon germ cells in mouse seminiferous tubules. Bar = 40 µm

Effect of Donor Reproductive Status on Ability of Baboon Germ Cells to Colonize Mouse Testes

Initially, the colonization and proliferation of prepubertal (1-yr-old) and postpubertal (7- and 14-yr-old) donor baboon testis cells in recipient mouse testes were studied during the first 2 mo after transplantation. Despite significant differences in appearance of germ cells in the prepubertal and postpubertal testes, donor cell-derived colonies in mouse seminiferous tubules appeared similar (compare Fig. 4, a and b with c and d). Transplanted donor germ cells were found on the basement membrane as single cells or chains of two to eight cells, and small groups or clusters of cells were also present. The baboon cells often showed blebs or pseudopod-like cytoplasmic extensions (Fig. 4). To quantify donor stem cell colonization and subsequent proliferation, the number of cell groups (clusters) observed in each recipient testis was counted (Table 1). A cluster was defined as a group of cells consisting of 10 or more cells in a 150-µm length of seminiferous tubule. The age of the donor appeared to have only a small effect on the efficiency of colonization (Table 1, lines 1–4, 7, 8). The number of recipient testes with clusters derived from 14-yr-old testis cells (8/12; Table 1, lines 7 and 8) was about twice that found for 1-yr-old testis cells (4/12; Table 1, lines 1 and 2), but the number of clusters per testis from 14-yr-old testis cells (1.25) was slightly less than that from 1-yr-old testis cells (1.75). The size of the cluster (the number of cells contained per cluster) was about 50% larger (12.3 vs. 18.9) for 14-yr-old than for 1-yr-old donor testis cells. These differences in number and size of clusters were not significant. Therefore, donor testis cell age appeared to have little effect on colonization during the first 2 mo following transplantation. Many more adult cells were available; consequently, postpubertal testis cells were used for subsequent experiments.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Whole-mount detection of donor baboon germ cells using baboon-specific antibodies 1 and 2 mo after transplantation into mouse testes. a) Germ cells from 1-yr-old baboon 1 mo after transplantation. Donor cells were cryopreserved for 589 days. Baboon spermatogonia in this panel have formed a group of eight cells and are present as individual or pairs of cells, which are typical of undifferentiated spermatogonia. The cells often show irregular shape with cytoplasmic extension (bleb, arrowheads) and cytoplasmic bridge (arrow). b) One-yr-old baboon spermatogonia 2 mo after transplantation. The pattern of cellular group formation is similar to that at 1 mo after transplantation shown in b. c) Germ cells from 7-yr-old baboon 2 mo after transplantation. Donor cells were cryopreserved for 99 days. Twelve cells can be seen as a cluster composed of individual and pairs (arrow) of cells. A prominent bleb can also be observed in an individual cell (arrowhead). Note the similarity of cellular group formation to those shown in a and b. d) Germ cells from 14-yr-old baboon 2 mo after transplantation. Donor cells were cryopreserved for 584 days. Each group of donor baboon cells is dispersed on the basement membrane of mouse seminiferous tubule in the form of individual and two to four associated cells, indicating that undifferentiated spermatogonia have replicated. Out of focus are intraluminal clumps of baboon cells (arrows). Bar = 40 µm (ac) and 100 µm (d)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Baboon germ cell colonization of immunodeficient mouse testes

Long-Term Colonization of Mouse Testes by Baboon Germ Cells

In order to characterize colonization over an extended time, donor cells from a single adult animal (7 yr old) were analyzed at 1–6 mo following transplantation (Table 1, lines 3–6, and Fig. 5). This approach was used to minimize variation that might arise among different donors, and one adult animal provides sufficient cells for many transplantations. The pattern of donor cell colonization observed in recipient testes remained similar up to 6 mo following transplantation, and groups of cells were found on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubules throughout the period (Fig. 5). These groups of cells had a distinct appearance with individual and connected cells clustered on the basement membrane, suggesting continued proliferation of transplanted donor baboon germ cells.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Colonization patterns of 7-yr-old baboon testis cells 3 (a) and 6 (b) mo following transplantation. Both groups of donor cells were cryopreserved for 70 days. a) Three mo after transplantation, donor germ cells have formed an extensive proliferation pattern, which was only occasionally observed 2 mo or later following transplantation. See Figure 3 for more common clusters at 3 mo. b) A cluster observed 6 mo following transplantation. Note that each chain of cells is short, which is composed of single or up to four associated cells, indicating limited expansion of donor baboon spermatogonia in recipient mouse testis at 6 mo. Scale bar = 100 µm (a) and 75 µm (b)

The length of time following transplantation influenced the degree of recipient seminiferous tubule colonization. Approximately 43% of recipient testes contained clusters at 1 and 2 mo, but this increased to more than 70% at 3 and 6 mo after transplantation. The average number of clusters per testis significantly increased from 1 to 3 mo following transplantation, from 0.5 to 9.2, and then decreased thereafter to 2.9 at 6 mo. The increase from 1 to 3 mo was highly significant (P = 0.003), and the decrease from 3 to 6 mo was just significant (P = 0.05). The number of cells in a cluster rose from 11 at 1 mo to about 20 at 3 and 6 mo, suggesting that a steady state of cell proliferation and disappearance had been reached in the colonies that remain after 3 mo. The maximum cell number per cluster observed in a testis was 22 at 2 mo, and 45 and 54 at 3 and 6 mo, respectively. Occasionally, extensive proliferation patterns with many more cells (Fig. 5a) were observed on the basement membrane in a few testes analyzed at 2 mo and later. Isolated single to short chains of cells, which did not form a cluster, were found dispersed in the seminiferous tubules in all the recipient testes throughout the study period. The pattern of transplanted germ cell colonization was similar regardless of the period of cryopreservation. It is important that no evidence of donor germ cell differentiation toward the lumen of the seminiferous tubule and no donor-derived spermatozoa were observed in any of the recipients.

DISCUSSION

Following transplantation of donor stem cells to a recipient, two processes occur. First, donor cells colonize the recipient environment, which involves migration to the appropriate location and survival. Stem cells often reside within a niche that is formed by the basement membrane and supporting cells [33]. Second, donor stem cells must increase in number and differentiate in the recipient environment to ultimately produce terminally differentiated cells. In studying these two processes, spermatogenesis is unique among self-renewing systems of the body because the transplantation technique allows 1) identification of individual colonies, which generally represent the activity of single stem cells; and 2) quantification of colony differentiation and expansion over time.

Studies using baboon testes from both prepubertal and postpubertal animals clearly demonstrate that stem cells of the baboon, regardless of reproductive age, can accomplish the first important part of the transplantation process. Baboon stem cells recognize mouse Sertoli cells, attach to the cell's apical surface, and migrate between these cells to reach the basement membrane. This directional movement of stem cells is a complicated process because Sertoli cells are closely connected by intercellular processes to form the "testis-blood" barrier that normally separates the unique antigens of differentiated germ cells that are present in the adluminal compartment of the seminiferous tubule from the immune cells and immunoglobulins of the testis interstitial tissue [34]. Therefore, molecules necessary for recognition of Sertoli cells and migration of baboon stem cells through the intercellular processes to reach the basement membrane must be compatible between baboon and mouse. This is remarkable considering that these species diverged in evolution 100 million years ago [35, 36]. Furthermore, baboon germ cells survive more than 6 mo in the niche formed by mouse testis cells, indicating that appropriate surface molecules and growth factors are available and compatible.

The long survival of baboon germ cells in the mouse testis and formation of clusters may represent a process of slow division of undifferentiated spermatogonia followed by apoptosis of early differentiation stages, a situation that has been described previously [3739]. For example, the seminiferous tubules in several experimentally produced infertile mouse models (cryptorchidism and vitamin A deficiency) [38, 39] and naturally occurring infertile mutant mice (Steel17H and jsd homozygous mutants) [39] display clusters of cells comprised of single cells and short chains of spermatogonia. Recent evidence suggests that in these situations the undifferentiated spermatogonia replicate, but are unable to proceed to differentiating spermatogonial stages, and undergo apoptosis [39]. The small clusters or colonies of baboon germ cells on the seminiferous tubule basement membrane of the mouse are also similar to the pattern of undifferentiated spermatogonia reported in the rhesus monkey following irradiation [37]. Limited spermatogonial proliferation and decline in cluster numbers over time observed in this study suggest that interactions between baboon germ cells and mouse testis environment may be suboptimal.

An important observation in these studies was the absence of differentiated donor germ cell stages in recipient seminiferous tubules. Thus, no evidence was found among donor germ cells of meiosis or spermiogenesis, the complex transition of germ cells to the unique spermatozoa morphology. These results differ from the report from Sofikitis and colleagues [13], indicating that transplantation of human testis cell suspensions to the seminiferous tubules of mouse or rat resulted in production of human spermatozoa in a significant number (>25%) of recipients. Previous studies have indicated similar results only when rat or hamster testis cells were transplanted to mouse, or mouse testis cells were transplanted to rat [79]. These species are all rodents and diverged in evolution only 10–15 million years ago [40]. Differentiating germ cells were never found when testis cells from rabbit, dog, pig, or bull, which have been diverged from the mouse for at least 60 million years [35, 36], were transplanted to mouse recipients [10, 11]. However, spermatogonia on the basement membrane could always be identified in these testis cell transplantations from distantly related species.

The results of the baboon testis cell transplantation experiments reported here suggest that the findings of Sofikitis and colleagues with human testis cell transplantation [13] reflect an unusual and unexpected outcome. The baboon and human diverged in evolution approximately 20 million years ago and have been separated from the mouse for a much longer period [36, 41]. Therefore, results following transplantation of testis cells from baboon and human to the mouse are likely to be similar and to mimic the pattern seen for donor cells from other distantly related nonrodent species. It seems unlikely that transplants of human cells to mice would be as successful as was found for transplants from rodents to mice. Additional information describing the techniques used by Sofikitis and colleagues [13] will be especially valuable in clarifying their results. In contrast, the findings of Reis and colleagues [12] may indicate only that they were unable to distinguish small donor germ cell clusters or colonies on the basement membrane in recipient seminiferous tubules without an appropriate antibody or other marker of stem cells and early germ cell stages. In their studies they relied on an antibody against proacrosin, which appears only in late stages (mid-pachytene primary spermatocytes and spermatids) of germ cell differentiation [42].

Finally, in the mouse spermatogonial transplantation system, which has been extensively studied, each colony is generally believed to represent the product of a single transplanted stem cell [18, 19] and the efficiency of colonization by transplanted stem cells has been estimated to be 5% to 10% [18, 19, 23]. If it is assumed that each baboon germ cell cluster identified in the recipient mouse testis represents a colony from a single stem cell and that the experimental procedure does not selectively affect stem cell survival, an efficiency of colonization might be roughly estimated from the data in Table 1. Approximately 10 µl of baboon testis cells at a concentration of 164 x 106 cells/ml (postpubertal) were injected into each testis, a total of 1.64 x 106 cells per testis. Because 50% of the cells were dead, about 0.8 x 106 viable cells entered the seminiferous tubules of a testis. If the stem cell concentration is about two in 104 testis cells, similar to the estimate for mouse [6, 43], then 160 stem cells would have been microinjected into the tubules of each testis. An average of 3.2 germ cell clusters or colonies were found in the recipient testes examined between 2 and 6 mo; therefore, about 1 in 50 (2.0%) of the baboon stem cells injected formed a cluster of primitive germ cells in the mouse that was maintained for 2 or more mo. This value of colonization efficiency could be an underestimation, because donor cells that did not belong to a cluster but were present in all recipient testes are not considered. Thus, the overall efficiency of baboon testis cell transplantation appeared not very different, for the initial colonization process, than has been observed when mouse testis cells were used in syngeneic transplantations.

Long-term maintenance of primitive baboon germ cell clusters in mouse testes clearly demonstrates that antigens, growth factors, and signaling molecules that interact between stem cells and the testis environment have been preserved for 100 million years in these widely divergent species [35, 36]. Together with results from nonprimate testis cell transplantation, these results indicate that similar biological properties have been preserved for spermatogonial stem cells among diverse mammalian species. Because human hematopoietic stem cells also colonize mouse bone marrow and generate differentiated cell lineages when human cytokines or supporting tissue is provided, stem cells of self-renewing tissues in general may share conserved signals and characteristics among species. Efforts to study and understand gene activity in stem cells of the germ line and of other self-renewing systems should be facilitated by this evolutionary conservation. A primary objective in spermatogonial transplantation studies will be to determine factors required to enhance proliferation and differentiation of primate donor germ cell colonies in mouse testes, and the baboon provides a valuable model. The central nature of spermatogonial stem cells and their differentiation process to species continuity makes such studies of high value.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. Elliott for the anti-human RBM antibody. We are grateful to K. Orwig for discussions and suggestions, and to I. Dobrinski and T. Shinohara for technical advice. We also thank C. Freeman and R. Naroznowski for assistance with animal maintenance and experimentation, J. Hayden for assistance with photographs, and C. Pope for manuscript preparation.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 13 November 2000.

1 This research was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grants 36504 to R.L.B and P51RR-13986 to the Southwest Regional Primate Research Center, Commonwealth and General Assembly of Pennsylvania, and the Robert J. Kleberg, Jr. and Helen C. Kleberg Foundation. Back

2 Correspondence: R.L. Brinster, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3850 Baltimore Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6009. FAX: 215 898 0667. Back

3 Current address: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, PQ, Canada H3A 1A1. Back

Accepted: December 13, 2000.

Received: October 19, 2000.

REFERENCES

  1. Austin CR. Form and differentiation of gametes. In: Austin CR (ed.) Fertilization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1965: 30–50
  2. Garner DL, Hafez ESE. Spermatozoa and seminal plasma. In: Hafez ESE (ed.), Reproduction in Farm Animals. Malvern, PA: Lea & Febiger; 1987: 165–187
  3. Clermont Y. Renewal of spermatogonia in man. Am J Anat 1966; 118:509–524[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Clermont Y. Two classes of spermatogonial stem cells in the monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Am J Anat 1969; 126:57–72[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Shinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED. Staging for laboratory species. In: Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1990: 62–194
  6. Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB. Spermatogonial stem cells. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds.), Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993: 266–295
  7. Clouthier DE, Avarbock MR, Maika SD, Hammer RE, Brinster RL. Rat spermatogenesis in mouse testis. Nature 1996; 381:418–421[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Xenogeneic spermatogenesis following transplantation of hamster germ cells to mouse testes. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:515–521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Brinster RL. Recipient preparation is critical for spermatogonial transplantation in the rat. Tissue Cell 1999; 31:461–472[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of germ cells from rabbits and dogs into mouse testes. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1331–1339[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Germ cell transplantation from large domestic animals into mouse testes. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 56:270–279
  12. Reis MM, Tsai MC, Schlegel PN, Feliciano M, Raffaelli R, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. Xenogeneic transplantation of human spermatogonia. Zygote 2000; 8:97–105[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Sofikitis N, Mio Y, Yamamoto Y, Miyagawa I. Transplantation of human spermatogonia into the seminiferous tubules (STs) of animal testicles results in the completion of the human meiosis and the generation of human motile spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 1999; 72(suppl 1):83–89 (abstract O-219)
  14. McCune JM, Naimikawa R, Kaneshima H, Schultz LD, Liberman M, Weissman IL. The SCID-hu mouse: murine model for the analysis of human hematolymphoid differentiation and function. Science 1988; 241:1632–1639[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lapidot T, Pflumio F, Murdoch B, Williams DE. Cytokine stimulation of multilineage hematopoiesis from immature human cells engrafted in SCID mice. Science 1992; 255:1137–1141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Nolta JA, Hanley MB, Kohn DB. Sustained human hematopoiesis in immunodeficient mice by cotransplantation of marrow stroma expressing human interleukin-3: analysis of gene transduction of long-lived progenitors. Blood 1994; 83:3041–3051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fraser CC, Kaneshima H, Hansteen G, Kilpatrick M, Hoffman R, Chen BP. Human allogeneic stem cell maintenance and differentiation in a long-term multilineage SCID-hu graft. Blood 1995; 86:1680–1693[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Dobrinski I, Ogawa T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Computer assisted image analysis to assess colonization of recipient seminiferous tubules by spermatogonial stem cells from transgenic donor mice. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 53:142–148[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Nagano M, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Pattern and kinetics of mouse donor spermatogonial stem cell colonization in recipient testes. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:1429–1436[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Functional analysis of spermatogonial stem cells in Steel and cryptorchid infertile mouse models. Dev Biol 2000; 220:401–411[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Ogawa T, Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Leuprolide, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, enhances colonization after spermatogonial transplantation into mouse testes. Tissue Cell 1998; 30:583–588[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. ß1- and {alpha}6-integrin are surface markers on mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999; 96:5504–5509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shinohara T, Orwig K, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:8346–8351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Romrell LJ, Bellvé AR, Fawcett DW. Separation of mouse spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A morphological characterization. Dev Biol 1976; 49:119–131[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. McCarrey JR, Berg WM, Paragioudakis SJ, Zhang PL, Dilworth DD, Arnold BL, Rossi JJ. Differential transcription of Pgk genes during spermatogenesis in the mouse. Dev Biol 1992; 154:160–168[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Avarbock MR, Brinster CJ, Brinster RL. Reconstitution of spermatogenesis from frozen spermatogonial stem cells. Nat Med 1996; 2:693–693[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Bucci LR, Meistrich ML. Effects of busulfan on murine spermatogenesis: cytotoxicity, sterility, sperm abnormalities and dominant lethal mutations. Mutat Res 1987; 176:259–268[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Brinster RL, Avarbock MR. Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91:11303–11307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ogawa T, Aréchaga JM, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Transplantation of testis germinal cells into mouse seminiferous tubules. Int J Dev Biol 1997; 41:111–122[Medline]
  30. Harlow E, Lane D. In: Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1988: 633
  31. Elliott DJ, Millar MR, Oghene K, Ross A, Kiesewetter F, Pryor J, McIntyre M, Hargreave TB, Saunders PT, Vogt PH, Chandley AC, Cooke H. Expression of RBM in the nuclei of human germ cells is dependent on a critical region of the Y chromosome long arm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997; 94:3848–3853[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. de Rooij DG, van Dissel-Emiliani FMF. Regulation of proliferation and differentiation of stem cells in the male germ line. In: Potten CS (ed.), Stem Cells. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997: 283–313
  33. Watt FM, Hogan BLM. Out of eden: stem cells and their niches. Science 2000; 287:1427–1430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Byers S, Pelletier R-M, Suarez-Quian C. Sertoli cell junctions and the seminiferous epithelium barrier. In: Russell LD, Griswold MD (eds.), The Sertoli Cell. Clearwater, FL: Cache River Press; 1993: 431–446
  35. Novacek MJ. Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree. Nature 1992; 356:121–125
  36. Kumar S, Hedges SB. A molecular time scale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 1998; 392:917–920
  37. van Alphen MMA, van de Kant HJG, de Rooij DG. Repopulation of the seminiferous epithelium of the rhesus monkey after X irradiation. Radiat Res 1988; 113:487–500[Medline]
  38. van Pelt AMM, de Rooij DG. Synchronization of the seminiferous epithelium after vitamin A replacement in vitamin A-deficient mice. Biol Reprod 1990; 43:363–367[Abstract]
  39. de Rooij DG, Okabe M, Nishimune Y. Arrest of spermatogonial differentiation in jsd/jsd, Sl17H/Sl17H, and cryptorchid mice. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:842–847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Catzeflis FM, Dickerman AW, Michaux J, Kirsch JAW. DNA hybridization and rodent phylogeny. In: Szalay FS, Novacek MJ, McKenna MC (eds.), Mammal Phylogeny: Placentals, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1993: 159–172
  41. Jeffreys AJ, Harris S, Barrie PA, Wood D, Blanchetot A, Adams SM. Evolution of gene families: The globin genes. In: Bendall DS (ed.), Evolution from Molecules to Men. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1983: 175–195
  42. Escalier D, Gallo JM, Albert M, Meduri G, Bermudez D, David G, Schrevel J. Human acrosome biogenesis: immunodetection of proacrosin in primary spermatocytes and of its partitioning pattern during meiosis. Development 1991; 113:779–788[Abstract]
  43. Tegelenbosch RA, de Rooij DG. A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat Res 1993; 290:193–200[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z. Zhang, J. Hill, M. Holland, Y. Kurihara, and K. L. Loveland
Bovine Sertoli Cells Colonize and Form Tubules in Murine Hosts Following Transplantation and Grafting Procedures
J Androl, July 1, 2008; 29(4): 418 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
N. Geijsen and D. L. Jones
Seminal discoveries in regenerative medicine: contributions of the male germ line to understanding pluripotency
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2008; 17(R1): R16 - R22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Marc Luetjens, J.-B. Stukenborg, E. Nieschlag, M. Simoni, and J. Wistuba
Complete Spermatogenesis in Orthotopic But Not in Ectopic Transplants of Autologously Grafted Marmoset Testicular Tissue
Endocrinology, April 1, 2008; 149(4): 1736 - 1747.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
B. P. Hermann, M. Sukhwani, C.-C. Lin, Y. Sheng, J. Tomko, M. Rodriguez, J. J. Shuttleworth, D. McFarland, R. M. Hobbs, P. P. Pandolfi, et al.
Characterization, Cryopreservation, and Ablation of Spermatogonial Stem Cells in Adult Rhesus Macaques
Stem Cells, September 1, 2007; 25(9): 2330 - 2338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. van den Berg, S. Repping, and F. van der Veen
Parental desire and acceptability of spermatogonial stem cell cryopreservation in boys with cancer
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 594 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Shinohara, M. Kato, M. Takehashi, J. Lee, S. Chuma, N. Nakatsuji, M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, and M. Hirabayashi
Rats produced by interspecies spermatogonial transplantation in mice and in vitro microinsemination
PNAS, September 12, 2006; 103(37): 13624 - 13628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. M. Oatley, M. R. Avarbock, A. I. Telaranta, D. T. Fearon, and R. L. Brinster
From the Cover: Identifying genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and survival
PNAS, June 20, 2006; 103(25): 9524 - 9529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Ehmcke, J. Wistuba, and S. Schlatt
Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2006; 12(3): 275 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Z. Zhang, S. Shao, and M. L. Meistrich
Irradiated Mouse Testes Efficiently Support Spermatogenesis Derived From Donor Germ Cells of Mice and Rats
J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 365 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. C. Leal and L. R. Franca
The Seminiferous Epithelium Cycle Length in the Black Tufted-Ear Marmoset (Callithrix penicillata) Is Similar to Humans
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2006; 74(4): 616 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
Y. Kim, V. Selvaraj, I. Dobrinski, H. Lee, M. C. Mcentee, and A. J. Travis
Recipient Preparation and Mixed Germ Cell Isolation for Spermatogonial Stem Cell Transplantation in Domestic Cats
J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 248 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, H. Miki, K. Inoue, N. Ogonuki, S. Toyokuni, A. Ogura, and T. Shinohara
Germline niche transplantation restores fertility in infertile mice
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2376 - 2382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Ohta and T. Wakayama
Generation of Normal Progeny by Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Following Grafting of Testicular Tissue from Cloned Mice That Died Postnatally
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 390 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Keros, B. Rosenlund, K. Hultenby, L. Aghajanova, L. Levkov, and O. Hovatta
Optimizing cryopreservation of human testicular tissue: comparison of protocols with glycerol, propanediol and dimethylsulphoxide as cryoprotectants
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1676 - 1687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
N. Sofikitis, E. Pappas, A. Kawatani, D. Baltogiannis, D. Loutradis, N. Kanakas, D. Giannakis, F. Dimitriadis, K. Tsoukanelis, I. Georgiou, et al.
Efforts to create an artificial testis: culture systems of male germ cells under biochemical conditions resembling the seminiferous tubular biochemical environment
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2005; 11(3): 229 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Wistuba, M. Mundry, C. M. Luetjens, and S. Schlatt
CoGrafting of Hamster (Phodopus sungorus) and Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) Testicular Tissues into Nude Mice Does Not Overcome Blockade of Early Spermatogenic Differentiation in Primate Grafts
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 2087 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
H. Tournaye, E. Goossens, G. Verheyen, V. Frederickx, G. De Block, P. Devroey, and A. Van Steirteghem
Preserving the reproductive potential of men and boys with cancer: current concepts and future prospects
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2004; 10(6): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Oatley, J. J. Reeves, and D. J. McLean
Biological Activity of Cryopreserved Bovine Spermatogonial Stem Cells During In Vitro Culture
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2004; 71(3): 942 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
P. Ma, Y. Ge, S. Wang, J. Ma, S. Xue, and D. Han
Spermatogenesis following syngeneic testicular transplantation in Balb/c mice
Reproduction, August 1, 2004; 128(2): 163 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Honaramooz, M.-W. Li, M. C. T. Penedo, S. Meyers, and I. Dobrinski
Accelerated Maturation of Primate Testis by Xenografting into Mice
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1500 - 1503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Oatley, D. M. de Avila, J. J. Reeves, and D. J. McLean
Testis Tissue Explant Culture Supports Survival and Proliferation of Bovine Spermatogonial Stem Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Kanatsu-Shinohara, S. Toyokuni, and T. Shinohara
CD9 Is a Surface Marker on Mouse and Rat Male Germline Stem Cells
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 70 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]