Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.
Biology of Reproduction 65, 128-134 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Estrogen Receptor ß in the Sheep Ovary During the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy1

H. Cárdenas2,a, K.A. Burkec, R.M. Bigsbyb, W.F. Popea, and K.P. Nephewc

a Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202 c Medical Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405

ABSTRACT

Objectives were to sequence and examine the expression of the estrogen receptor ß (ERß) in the sheep ovary. The sequence of the ovine ERß (oERß) was determined using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cloning techniques. The reading frame of oERß contained 527 amino acids and exhibited high overall homology with cow (98%), rat (88%), and human (88%) ERß. In addition, an oERß isoform having a 139-base pair deletion (oERß1) was identified. The predicted amino acid sequence of this isoform is lacking the ligand-binding and carboxyl-terminal transactivation domains. The oERß protein and mRNA were determined in ovaries obtained from ewes on Days 0 (first day of estrus), 2, 6, and 10 of the estrous cycle and Day 30 of gestation. Immunohistochemistry showed that oERß protein was located in granulosa cells, the ovarian surface epithelium, endothelium, and Day 2 corpus luteum (CL). Weak immunostaining for ERß was detected in the theca interna. Relative steady-state amounts of oERß mRNA in the CL were determined using semiquantitative RT-PCR. Amounts of oERß mRNA were greater (P < 0.05) during CL formation (Day 2) than at later stages. The oERß to oERß1 mRNA ratio was lower (P < 0.05) on Day 2 than on Day 10 or Day 30 due to a decrease in amounts of oERß1. Results indicate that the oERß is a 527-amino acid protein expressed in specific cells of the ovary. Changes in relative amounts of full-length oERB and a deletion isoform in CL occurred during the estrous cycle, suggesting that these two types of ERß might regulate estrogen actions during early CL development in sheep.

corpus luteum, estradiol receptor, follicle, ovary

INTRODUCTION

Estrogens are important regulators of reproductive processes in female mammals. Estrogen receptor {alpha} (ER{alpha}) and ERß mediate the actions of estrogens by regulating transcription of target genes. Most tissues of female reproductive organs express both ER{alpha} and ERß [1] and the relative expression levels of these receptors may play a major role in mediating estrogen actions in a particular tissue. It is not clear whether ER{alpha} and ERß have specific functions in cells that coexpress them or whether they interact by forming ER{alpha}/ß heterodimers, to regulate the expression of common target genes [2, 3].

The ERß has been consistently detected in the membrana granulosa of follicles of different species including rats, mice, humans, marmosets, and cattle [411]. Some of these studies demonstrated that ERß was the predominant, or the only, estrogen receptor expressed in granulosa cells [7, 8, 11]. Although ER{alpha} mRNA and protein have been shown to be present in ovine granulosa cells [12], expression of ERß in the sheep ovary has not been examined. Low amounts of ERß mRNA have been detected in the corpus luteum (CL) [1, 6, 1317] and theca cells [1, 6] of several species. In addition to being highly expressed in granulosa cells, functional studies have shown that ERß can stimulate transcriptional activation in these cells [9, 18]. The importance of ERß in ovarian function has been demonstrated in ERß knockout mice that exhibited a high incidence of ovulation failure and decreased number of offspring [19].

Although multiple isoforms of the ERß mRNA have been detected and characterized [17, 2027], little is known about the regulation of ERß isoform expression and functional significance. Differential tissue expression and ability of C-terminal ERß isoforms to form dimers with wild-type ER{alpha} or ERß that bind DNA have been reported in humans [24]. A rat ERß isoform containing an 18-amino acid insertion in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) inhibited estrogen-induced transcription and might function as a dominant negative regulator of estrogen actions in vivo [23]. The ERß seems to be important in ovarian function of several species so far examined; however, studies on ERß in sheep are lacking. The objectives of the present experiments were to sequence and determine the expression of ERß in the sheep ovary during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and Tissue Collection

Ovaries were obtained from ewes (Targhee x Hampshire cross) on Days 0 (first day of estrus), 2, 6, or 10 of the estrous cycle and Day 30 of pregnancy (n = 2–4 ewes per group). A portion of the CL was dissected from luteal phase ovaries, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80°C. Residual tissue from ovaries containing CL, and ovaries collected at estrus, were fixed for histological determinations. Procedures for handling the experimental animals were approved by our Institutional Animal Use and Care Committee.

Cloning and Sequencing

Total RNA was isolated from ovarian tissue using the RNeasy procedure (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Integrity of RNA was verified by visually estimating the 28s to 18s rRNA ratio on pictures of formaldehyde-agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Purity of RNA was determined by calculating the 260–280 nm absorbance ratio. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed using a commercial kit (Perkin Elmer, Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ). Reactions for first-strand cDNA synthesis included 5 mM MgCl2, 1x reaction buffer, 1 mM dNTPs, 1 U/µl RNase inhibitor, 2.5 U/µl murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, 2.5 µM random hexamers, and 0.5 µg of total RNA per 10 µl of reaction volume. Tubes were incubated for 10 min at room temperature, 30 min at 42°C, 5 min at 99°C, and then chilled to 5°C.

Primers for amplification of overlapping and nested fragments of oERß were designed based on the human [28], bovine [10], and ovine (partial sequence, GenBank AF110817) ERß sequences. The primers used for the amplification of oERß fragments are shown in Table 1. Polymerase chain reactions were performed for 35 cycles in 50-µl mixtures containing 10 µl of RT reaction, 1.5 or 2 mM MgCl2, 0.3 µM primers, 200 µM dNTPs, and 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Conditions for thermal cycling were: denaturation for 1 min at 95°C, annealing for 45 sec at 55°C, and extension for 2 min at 72°C, with the exception of fragments 1 and 6 for which annealing temperature started at 65°C and decreased 0.5°C per cycle to 55°C (touchdown PCR). The last cycle included 7 min additional of extension at 72°C that was followed by cooling to 5°C. Products were analyzed by agarose-gel electrophoresis, visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV illumination, and then photographed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Primers used for cloning the oER{ß}

The PCR products were cloned into pCR2.1 vector using the Original TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Primers h584 and h1479 generated two bands. Both bands remained following PCR optimization and were cloned simultaneously. Sequence analysis demonstrated that one of the products was an exon 5-deleted isoform of oERß (named oERß1). Both strands of two to three clones for each product representing possible ERß fragments were sequenced. The reading frame of ERß was determined by multiple sequence alignment using MACAW [29], a program available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) ftp server. The cDNA and predicted amino acid sequences of oERß and oERß1 were then compared to reported sequences using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool at the NCBI Internet page (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Homology analysis among protein sequences of the ovine, bovine, and rat ERß was performed using ClustalW (BioEdit; North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC).

Immunohistochemistry

Tissue localization of full-length oERß was determined using a polyclonal rabbit antibody directed against a C-terminal synthetic peptide of the rat ERß (PA1-310; Affinity Bioreagents, Golden, CO). This 19-amino acid peptide (CSSTEDSKNKESSQNLQSQ) has 9 residues (47%) identical to the equivalent ovine sequence. An average of 6 amino acids has been reported to constitute antigenic determinants in peptides [30]. Ovaries were incubated overnight at 4°C in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4). The tissues were then rinsed in PBS and cryoprotected by infiltration of 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C. The tissues were sectioned into blocks, embedded in Tissue Fixing Medium (Triangle Biomedical Sciences, Durham, NC), frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. The blocks were cut on a cryostat into 8-µm sections and the sections were mounted onto slides (Superfrost/Plus; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), and dried at room temperature for 1–2 h. Sections were then postfixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min, rinsed, dehydrated in ascending ethanol solutions, and stored at -80°C.

Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the slides to 95°C in citrate buffer (pH 6.0; DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, CA) for 25 min. Slides were cooled to room temperature in the same buffer and then washed in PBS. Endogenous peroxide was blocked by incubation with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in 40% methanol for 30 min. Slides were washed three times (5 min per wash) using 0.5% Tween 20 in PBS (PBS-Tween). All subsequent washings were performed in the same manner unless otherwise indicated. Sections were treated with normal goat serum (#G9023; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 20 min, washed, and then incubated overnight at 4°C in anti-ERß primary antibody diluted to 8 µg/ml in PBS-Tween containing 1% BSA. Negative control sections were incubated in antibody diluent alone or in antibody preabsorbed with a 10-fold excess of peptide (PEP 007; Affinity Bioreagents). Sections were washed and incubated for 1 h with secondary antibody (biotinylated goat anti-rabbit, 1/400; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and then 1 h with ABC reagent (Vector Laboratories). After washing, the slides were treated with nickel-intensified diaminobenzidine (DAB substrate kit; Vector Laboratories) for 5–8 min, rinsed in water, and then in PBS, dehydrated, and coverslipped. Sections were viewed using a microscope, photographed with a SPOT RT CCD camera and SPOT software (Diagnostic Instruments, Inc., Sterling Heights, MI), and processed for publication using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA).

Reverse Transcription-PCR of oERß in CL

Total RNA was isolated from CL tissue using TRI Reagent (MRC, Inc., Cincinnati, OH) and reverse transcribed as described. Amplifications of oERß, ovine ribosomal protein L19 (oL19), and the simultaneous amplification of oERß and oERß1, were performed using 5-µl aliquots (equivalent to 250 ng of total RNA) of the same reverse transcription reaction. Primers for oERß were designed based on the sequence described in the present study. A 493-base pair (bp) fragment of the full-length oERß was amplified using the primers 482U (sense, 5'-GGT CAT GTG AAG GAT GTA AG-3') and 974D (antisense, 5'-ACT TGG TCG TAC AGG CTG AG). The primer 974D anneals within exon 5 of the oERß transcript and specifically amplifies the full-length oERß and not the oERß1 isoform. The full-length oERß (895-bp fragment) and oERß1 (756-bp fragment) were amplified simultaneously using primers 482U and 1376D (antisense, 5'-AGG AGC ATC AGC AGG TTA GC-3').

Initially, glyceraldehyde-3 phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was chosen as an internal control. Expression of GAPDH decreased with day of CL development (data not shown), making it an unsuitable control. Ribosomal protein L19 (L19) was then evaluated using primers for rat L19 [31]. A single PCR product of predicted size was obtained and sequenced. This product of 497 bp exhibited high homology with L19 of other species including the human (92%, GenBank X63527), mouse (90%, GenBank NM-009078), and rat (89%, GenBank J02650). New primers (sense: 5'-AGC TGT GAC TGT CCA TTC-3', and antisense: 5'-CTT GCG AGC CTT GTC TGC-5') were synthesized based on this sequence and used to amplify a 299-bp fragment of oL19.

The same touchdown (35 cycles) and standard PCR protocols described above were used for the simultaneous amplification of oERß and oERß1, and for the amplification of oERß (30 cycles) and oL19 (22 cycles), respectively. The number of cycles for each PCR protocol was set within the exponential portion of the amplification curve that was determined by sampling PCR reactions every other cycle in preliminary assays. Reverse transcriptase was replaced by water in a set of reactions run as controls to detect bands not generated by RNA. Resulting products were analyzed by agarose-gel electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide. Pictures of gels were taken using instant film (Polaroid T57), and cDNA bands were subjected to densitometric analysis using the Image-J program from the National Institutes of Health (available on the Internet at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Relative mRNA abundance was estimated by calculating the ratio of intensities of oERß to oL19 bands.

Statistical Analyses

Analyses were performed using SYSTAT [32]. The effects of day on the relative amounts of oERß mRNA and on the oERß to oERß1 transcript ratio were determined by ANOVA. Means were compared using protected least significant difference tests.

RESULTS

Ovine ERß Sequence

The oERß reading frame has 1581 nucleotides, and its predicted translation generated a protein composed of 527 amino acids (Fig. 1). This protein exhibited high overall homology with the bovine (98%, GenBank AF110403), rat (89%, GenBank CAA05631), and human (88%, GenBank Q92731) ERß (Fig. 2A). Comparisons within the different regions of the receptor showed the highest mean homology for the C (or DBD), followed by the E/F (or ligand-binding domain, LBD), D, and A/B regions (Fig. 2B).



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Sequence of the full-length oERß coding region and its predicted translation (GenBank accession no. 177936). The start codon is bolded and italized and the stop codon is indicated by an asterisk. Cysteine residues important for binding to DNA in the C domain are shaded. The 139-bp fragment that is missing in a deletion isoform found during cloning is underlined. Nucleotide and amino acid numbers are indicated on the right



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Sequence alignment (A) and regional homology (B) of oERß with the bovine (bERß), human (hERß), and rat ERß (rERß). The amino acid numbers per region given in parentheses in B correspond to oERß and were deduced by homology with the primary structure of human ERß [3]. Dots indicate amino acids that are identical to the oERß sequence. Amino acid numbers are indicated on the right

An isoform lacking 139 nucleotides in the E/F region (nucleotide 945–1083, bolded and underlined in Fig. 1) was detected during sequence analysis. The deleted isoform appeared as a clearly visible band when primers spanning the deleted region were used for cDNA amplification. As expected, when one of the primers was designed to bind within the deleted region, only a single product (full-length oERß) was detected (Fig. 3). Translation of the deleted isoform showed a shift in the reading frame and a stop codon in the E/F region, indicating that this isoform would generate a truncated protein that lacks most of the LBD and the putative C-terminal activation domain (Fig. 4). The 139-bp deletion begins at the 3'-end of exon 4 (C at position 945, Fig. 1) and ends at the 3'-end of exon 5 (G at position 1083, Fig. 1). Exon 5 of human ERß has 138 bp [5], and homology analysis demonstrated the same number of base pairs for exon 5 of the oERß. Therefore, this oERß isoform probably originated by elimination of exon 5 through alternative splicing. Results indicated that the oERß1 mRNA is relatively abundant in the ovary (Fig. 3).



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Detection of the full-length oERß (895-bp and 493-bp fragments) and the deleted isoform oERß1 (756-bp fragment) in the sheep ovary by RT-PCR. Two products were generated by using primers spanning a deletion of 139 bp (lane 1), and only one product was amplified when a downstream primer that anneals within exon 5 was used (lane 3). Lanes 2 and 4 are negative controls (no reverse transcriptase was included in the reaction mixture). M, 100-bp DNA ladder. Numbers on the right indicate base pairs



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4. Partial sequence and predicted translation of an isoform of oERß containing a 139-bp deletion in the E/F region (GenBank accession no. AF257109). A shift in the reading frame introduces a stop codon (asterisk) in the E/F region. The underlined residues are not homologous to full-length oERß

Immunohistochemistry of oERß in the Ovary

Immunostaining for oERß was observed in nuclei of granulosa cells of preantral and antral follicles, at all days examined (Fig. 5, A–C). Immunostaining for oERß was also observed in the ovarian surface epithelium (OSE; Fig. 5D), endothelium (Fig. 5, A and G), and in a proportion of cells of Day 2 CL (Fig. 5H). Granulosa cells of follicles having structural signs of atresia (e.g., dispersed granulosa cells) also showed specific oERß staining (Fig. 5E). Theca interna of antral follicles exhibited weak immunostaining for oERß (Fig. 5, B and C). No immunostaining was observed in negative controls that included sections incubated with immunoabsorbed antibody or in sections for which the antibody was omitted.



View larger version (106K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5. Immunohistochemical localization of oERß in the sheep ovary. Ovine ERß was detected in granulosa cells of follicles (AC), OSE (B and D), blood vessels (A and G), follicles with structural signs of atresia (E), and in a proportion of cells of Day 2 CL (H). Staining for oERß in theca interna was weak (AC), and no specific staining was observed in Day 10 CL (F). gc, Granulosa cells; bv, blood vessel; tc, theca interna; pf, preantral follicle; ef, early antral follicle. Bars = 300 µm (AC and G) or 20 µm (DF and H)

Ovine ERß mRNA in CL

The relative amounts of oERß mRNA was influenced by day of CL development (P = 0.02). Amounts of oERß mRNA decreased (P < 0.05) after Day 2 and remained low up to Day 30 (Fig. 6, A and B). The oERß to oERß1 mRNA ratio was lower (P < 0.02) on Day 2 than on Days 10 or 30. The ratio was lower (P = 0.04) on Day 6 than on Day 10, and there was a tendency (P = 0.06) for a lower ratio on Day 6 than on Day 30 (Fig. 6C).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6. Relative amounts of oERß mRNA determined by RT-PCR during CL development. A) Agarose-gel electrophoresis of oERß, oERß1, and oL19 (used as internal control) during Days 2, 6, and 10 of the estrous cycle and Day 30 of pregnancy (indicated above the gel, each lane represents one animal); M, 100-bp DNA ladder. B) Relative oERß mRNA amounts as determined by densitometric analysis of bands presented in A. *Greater (P < 0.05) than the other means. C) Ovine ERß (895-bp fragment) to oERß1 ratio of densitometric values of bands depicted in A. Data of C were transformed to logarithms for analysis, arithmetic means are presented. **Different than Days 10 and 30 (P < 0.05). *Different (P = 0.04) than Day 10. Lines on bars represent the SEM (B and C)

DISCUSSION

The predicted oERß protein is composed of 527 amino acids, and its sequence is very similar to the ERß of cattle [10], a closely related species. The DBD of oERß was 100% homologous with a variety of species including the cow, human, and other species of bird and fish, which is consistent with the notion that the DBD is a highly conserved region of steroid receptors. The translation start site of ERß is not well defined. Initially, methionine at position 54 (Fig. 2A) was considered a possible start site in the human [33] and rat [4]. The ERß sequences of human and rat subsequently described have start sites equivalent or upstream to the sheep (Fig. 2A). Similar to the cow, the oERß sequence has a valine at position 46 instead of a methionine, which was considered a possible initiation codon in the rat [4] and mouse [34].

Though multiple isoforms of the ERß gene have been reported in different species, only the isoform lacking exon 5 was detected in the sheep ovary in the present study. The exon 5-deleted isoform of ERß has been found in reproductive organs and mammary glands of humans [22, 27], mice [22], and granulosa cells of cattle [17]. Transient transfection studies demonstrated that the cow exon 5-deleted isoform was unable to transactivate an estrogen-response element (ERE) construct, probably due to the lack of LBD [17]. It is not known whether this transcriptionally inactive isoform competes with full-length ERß for binding to ERE.

The abundance of oERß1 mRNA was approximately half the full-length oERß at the beginning of CL development (Day 2) and then gradually decreased, becoming very low by Day 10 and remaining low by Day 30. Full-length oERß became the predominant isoform (about six times higher than oERß1) in Day 10 and Day 30 CL. This is the first study that demonstrates changes in expression patterns of ERß isoforms during CL development. The biological significance of these changes in ERß isoform expression are not known at present, but it may be that loss of the truncated isoform allows estrogenic stimulation of CL through decreased competition for ERE on target genes.

Production of the truncated oERß isoform might also impinge upon synthesis of the full-length receptor. Because the oERß1 isoform seems to originate by alternative splicing, changes in its rate of synthesis would probably alter the amounts of full-length oERß mRNA. Therefore, the factors that regulate alternative splicing could indirectly influence the synthesis of full-length oERß mRNA. Alternative splicing occurs by complex interactions between RNA and proteins, among them some members of the small nuclear ribonucleoproteins and serine-arginine splicing factors [35]. The changes in expression patterns of ERß isoforms during development in particular cell types might be a modulatory mechanism of estrogen actions in the ovary [9].

Localization of oERß in granulosa cells of preantral and antral follicles is consistent with previous reports in other species [412]. It is worth noting that the immunostaining observed in the present study would include only the full-length oERß, not the truncated protein lacking the LBD generated by the oERß1 transcript. Staining intensity of oERß protein in granulosa cells at different days of the estrous cycle was similar, suggesting that major changes in oERß expression in granulosa cells are absent in sheep and that oERß might be important for regulation of most stages of follicular development. Immunoreactive ERß was present in granulosa cells of antral follicles undergoing atresia. Whether this is only a residual or functional protein remains to be determined. Little is known about control of ERß gene expression in granulosa cells. A regulatory event that has been documented in rats and rhesus monkeys is a decrease in ERß mRNA [13] or protein [7, 36] after the administration of ovulatory doses of hCG. Somewhat related is the finding that the preovulatory LH surge also inhibits aromatase (CYP19) transcription and increases degradation of aromatase mRNA [37]. This would result in decreased synthesis of 17ß-estradiol, the predominant ligand of estrogen receptors. Therefore, the ovulatory LH surge could attenuate estrogenic effects in the preovulatory follicle.

Cells of the membrana granulosa (which usually express high levels of ERß) and theca interna differentiate into large and small luteal cells, respectively [38]. Although it is not known whether ERß is downregulated in granulosa cells of sheep by the preovulatory LH surge, our results indicate that ERß mRNA and protein were present during early CL development (Day 2) and then decreased in more developed CL. In humans, amounts of ERß mRNA were high during the early luteal phase and then decreased [16], similar to what we observed in the sheep. In the rhesus monkey, however, the opposite pattern of ERß gene expression has been reported [39].

Zieba et al. [40] determined that ER{alpha} immunostaining in sheep CL was weak on Day 6 and increased by Day 9 of the estrous cycle. These results indicate that ER{alpha} has a different pattern of expression than ERß, suggesting that the roles of these receptors in the sheep CL might differ. The functions of estrogens in the ovine CL are not known. Estrogens are considered to be luteotropic in the rat, rabbit, and pig [41]. Proliferation of small luteal cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells during CL formation is very intense and seems to be influenced by growth factors, LH, and growth hormone [41]. In this study, ERß was detected in endothelial cells and might have a role in the intense vascularization occurring during CL formation. Estrogens regulate transcription of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent inducer of angiogenesis [42], and both VEGF and its type 2 receptor are highly expressed in the bovine CL during the early luteal phase [43].

We determined that oERß protein is present in the sheep OSE, which agrees with results in humans [44, 45] and cynomolgus monkeys [15]. Likewise, cells of sheep OSE contain ER{alpha} [12]. Enzymatic activity originating from the OSE has been associated with follicular rupture during ovulation in sheep [46]. Cultured bovine OSE cells synthesize growth factors and growth factor receptors that are regulated by gonadotropins [47, 48]. FSH stimulates multiplication of OSE cells, and this effect has been related to ovarian cancer cell proliferation [49]. It is not known whether ERß mediates regulation of these or other unknown processes in the OSE.

In summary, the oERß reading frame encodes a 527-amino acid protein that is expressed in multiple cell types of the ovary, particularly in granulosa cells of follicles where it might be an important mediator of autocrine actions of estradiol. We are reporting, for the first time, changes in ERß isoform expression during CL development, the significance of which remains to be determined.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The support of Amrita Ahluwalia of Indiana University and the personnel at the Sheep Unit of the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, are greatly appreciated.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 9 January 2001.

1 Salaries and research support provided by State and Federal funds appropriated to The Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center and The Ohio State University. This research is manuscript no. 42-00AS and was supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health, PHS CA74748 to K.P.N. and CA74748 postdoctoral award to H.C. Back

2 Correspondence: H. Cárdenas, Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, 2029 Coffey Rd., Columbus, OH 43210. FAX: 614 292 7116; cardenas-seijas.2{at}osu.edu Back

Accepted: February 15, 2001.

Received: November 28, 2000.

REFERENCES

  1. Mowa CN, Iwanaga T. Differential distribution of oestrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß mRNAs in the female reproductive organ of rats as revealed by in situ hybridization. J Endocrinol 2000; 165:59-66[Abstract]
  2. Cowley SM, Hoare S, Mosselman S, Parker MG, Pettersson K, Grandien K, Kuiper GG, Gustafsson JÂ. Mouse estrogen receptor ß forms estrogen response element-binding heterodimers with estrogen receptor {alpha}. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:1486-1496[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Hiroi H, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi Y, Muramatsu M. The complete primary structure of human estrogen receptor ß (hERß) and its heterodimerization with ER{alpha} in vivo and in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 243:122-126[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kuiper GGJM, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson J. Cloning of a novel estrogen receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93:5925-5930[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Grandien K, Lagercrantz S, Lagercrantz J, Fried G, Nordenskjöld M, Gustafsson J-Â. Human estrogen receptor ß-gene structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82:4258-4265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Saunders FTK, Millar MR, Williams K, Macpherson S, Harkiss D, Anderson RA, Orr B, Groome NP, Scobie G, Fraser HM. Differential expression of estrogen receptor-{alpha} and -ß and androgen receptor in the ovaries of marmosets and humans. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1098-1105[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Fitzpatrick SL, Funkhouser JM, Sindoni DM, Stevis PE, Deecher DC, Bapat AR, Merchenthaler I, Frail DE. Expression of estrogen receptor-ß in rodent ovary. Endocrinology 1999; 140:2581-2591[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Drummond AE, Baillie AJ, Findlay JK. Ovarian estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß mRNA expression: impact of development and estrogen. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999; 149:153-161[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. O'Brien ML, Park K, In Y, Parke-Sarge O-K. Characterization of estrogen receptor-ß (ERß) messenger ribonucleic acid and protein expression in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4530-4541[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Rosenfeld CS, Yuan X, Manikkam M, Calder MD, Garverick HA, Lubahn DB. Cloning, sequencing, and localization of bovine estrogen receptor-ß within the ovarian follicle. Biol Reprod 1999; 60:691-697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sar M, Welsh F. Differential expression of estrogen receptor-ß and estrogen receptor-{alpha} in the rat ovary. Endocrinology 1999; 140:963-971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Tomanek M, Pisselet C, Monget P, Madigou T, Thieuland ML, Monniaux D. Estrogen receptor protein and mRNA expression in the ovary of sheep. Mol Reprod Dev 1997; 48:53-62[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Byers M, Kuipeer GGJM, Gustafsson JÂ, Park-Sarge O-K. Estrogen receptor-ß mRNA expression in rat ovary: Down-regulation by gonadotropins. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:172-182[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Telleria CM, Zhong L, Deb S, Srivastava RK, Park KS, Sugino N, Parke-Sarge O-K, Gibori G. Differential expression of the estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß in the rat corpus luteum of pregnancy: Regulation by prolactin and placental lactogen. Endocrinology 1998; 139:2432-2442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Pelletier G, Luu-The V, Charbonneau A, Labrie F. Cellular localization of estrogen receptor beta messenger ribonucleic acid in cynomolgus monkey reproductive organs. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1249-1255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Misao R, Nakanishi Y, Sun WS, Fujimoto J, Iwagaki S, Hirose R, Tamaya T. Expression of estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß mRNA in corpus luteum of human subjects. Mol Hum Reprod 1999; 5:17-21[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Walther N, Lioutas C, Tillmann G. Cloning of bovine estrogen receptor beta (ERß): expression of novel deleted isoforms in reproductive tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999; 152:37-45[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Sharma SC, Clemens JW, Pisarska MD, Richards JS. Expression and function of estrogen receptors subtypes in granulosa cells: regulation by estradiol and forskolin. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4320-4334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Krege JH, Hodgin JB, Couse JF, Enmark E, Warner M, Mahler JF, Sar M, Korach KS, Gustafsson J-A, Smithies O. Generation and reproductive phenotypes of mice lacking estrogen receptor ß. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:15677-15682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Chu S, Fuller PJ. Identification of a splice variant of the rat estrogen receptor ß gen. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1997; 132:195-199[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Hanstein B, Liu H, Yancisin MC, Brown M. Functional analysis of a novel estrogen receptor ß isoform. Mol Endocrinol 1999; 13:129-137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lu B, Leygue E, Dotzlaw H, Murphy LJ, Murphy LC, Watson PH. Estrogen receptor ß mRNA variants in human and murine tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1998; 138:199-203[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Maruyama K, Endoh H, Sasaki-Iwaoka H, Kanou H, Shimaya E, Hashimoto S, Kato S, Kawashima H. A novel isoform of estrogen receptor ß with 18 amino acid insertion in the ligand binding domain as a putative dominant negative regulator of estrogen action. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 246:142-147[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Moore JT, McKee DD, Slentz -Kesler K, Moore LB, Jones SA, Horne EL, Su JL, Kliewer SA, Lehmann JM, Wilson TM. Cloning and characterization of human estrogen receptor ß isoforms. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 247:75-78[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ogawa S, Inoue S, Watanabe T, Orimo A, Hosoi T, Ouchi W, Muramatsu M. Molecular cloning and characterization of human estrogen receptor ßcx: a potential inhibitor of estrogen actions in humans. Nucleic Acids Res 1998; 26:3505-3512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Petersen DN, Tkalcevic GT, Koza-Taylor PH, Turi TG, Brown TA. Identification of estrogen receptor ß2, a functional variant of estrogen receptor ß expressed in normal rat tissues. Endocrinology 1998; 139:1082-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Speirs V, Adams IP, Walton DS, Atkin SL. Identification of wild-type and exon 5 deletion variants of estrogen receptor ß in normal human mammary gland. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85:1601-1605[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Bhat RA, Harnish DC, Stevis PE, Lyttle CR, Komm BS. A novel estrogen receptor ß: identification and functional analysis of additional N-terminal amino acids. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1998; 67:233-240[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Schuler GD, Altschul SF, Lipman DJ. A workbench for multiple alignment construction and analysis. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 1991; 9:180-190[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Appel JR, Pinilla C, Niman H, Houghten R. Elucidation of discontinuous linear determinants in peptides. J Immunol 1990; 144:976-983[Abstract]
  31. Steinmetz R, Mitchner NA, Grant A, Allen DL, Bigsby RM, Ben-Jonathan N. The xenoestrogen bisphenol A induces growth, differentiation, and c-fos gene expression in the female reproductive tract. Endocrinology 1998; 139:2741-2747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Wilkinson L. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc.; 1990
  33. Mosselman S, Polman J, Dijkema R. ERß: identification and characterization of a novel human estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett 1996; 392:49-53[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Tremblay GB, Tramblay A, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkis NA, Labrie F, Giguere V. Cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional analysis of the murine estrogen receptor ß. Mol Endocrinol 1997; 11:353-365[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Smith WJ, Valcárcel J. Alternative pre-mRNA splicing: the logic of combinatorial control. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:381-388[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Chaffin CL, Stouffer RL, Duffy DM. Gonadotropin and steroid regulation of steroid receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in macaque granulosa cells during the periovulatory interval. Endocrinology 1999; 140:4753-4760[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Fitzpatrick SL, Carlone DL, Robker RL, Richards JS. Expression of aromatase in the ovary: down-regulation of mRNA by the ovulatory luteinizing hormone surge. Steroids 1997; 62:197-206[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Smith MF, McIntush EW, Smith GW. Mechanisms associated with corpus luteum development. J Anim Sci 1994; 72:1857-1872[Abstract]
  39. Duffy DM, Chafin CL, Stouffer RL. Expression of estrogen receptor {alpha} and ß in the rhesus monkey corpus luteum during the menstrual cycle: regulation by luteinizing hormone and progesterone. Endocrinology 2000; 141:1711-1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Zieba D, Bilinska B, Schmalz-Fraczek B, Murawski M. Immunohistochemical localization of estrogen receptors in the ovine corpus luteum throughout the estrous cycle. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2000; 38:111-117[Medline]
  41. Niswender GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntush EW. Mechanisms controlling the function and life span of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 2000; 80:1-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Hyder SM, Nawaz Z, Chiappetta C, Stancel GM. Identification of functional estrogen response elements in the gene coding for the potent angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor. Cancer Res 2000; 60:3183-3190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Berisha B, Schams D, Kosmann M, Amselgruber W, Einspanier R. Expression and tissue concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor, its receptors, and localization in the bovine corpus luteum during estrous cycle and pregnancy. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:1106-1114[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Brandenberger AW, Tee MK, Jaffe RB. Estrogen receptor alpha (ER-alpha) and beta (ER-beta) mRNAs in normal ovary, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma and ovarian cancer cell lines: down-regulation of ER-beta in neoplastic tissue. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:1025-1028[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Hillier SG, Anderson RA, Williams AR, Tetsuka M. Expression of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in cultured ovarian surface epithelial cells. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4:811-815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Colgin DC, Murdock WJ. Evidence for a role of the ovarian surface epithelium in the ovulatory mechanism of the sheep: secretion of urokinase-type plasminogen activator. Anim Reprod Sci 1997; 47:197-204[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Doraiswamy V, Parrott JA, Skinner MK. Expression and action of transforming growth factor alpha in normal ovarian surface epithelium and ovarian cancer. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:789-796[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Parrott JA, Mosher R, Kim G, Skinner MK. Autocrine regulation of keratinocyte growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and kit-ligand in the regulation of normal ovarian surface epithelial cells. Endocrinology 2000; 141:2532-2539[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Zheng W, Lu JJ, Luo F, Zheng Y, Feng Y, Felix JC, Lauchlan SC, Pike MC. Ovarian epithelial tumor growth promotion by follicle-stimulating hormone and inhibition of the effect by luteinizing hormone. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 76:80-88[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. Manikkam, R. C. Thompson, C. Herkimer, K. B. Welch, J. Flak, F. J. Karsch, and V. Padmanabhan
Developmental Programming: Impact of Prenatal Testosterone Excess on Pre- and Postnatal Gonadotropin Regulation in Sheep
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2008; 78(4): 648 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Malekinejad, E. J Schoevers, I. J.J.M Daemen, C. Zijlstra, B. Colenbrander, J. Fink-Gremmels, and B. A.J Roelen
Exposure of Oocytes to the Fusarium Toxins Zearalenone and Deoxynivalenol Causes Aneuploidy and Abnormal Embryo Development in Pigs
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 840 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J. L Juengel, D. A Heath, L. D Quirke, and K. P McNatty
Oestrogen receptor {alpha} and {beta}, androgen receptor and progesterone receptor mRNA and protein localisation within the developing ovary and in small growing follicles of sheep
Reproduction, January 1, 2006; 131(1): 81 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. X. Liao, R. R. Magness, and D.-b. Chen
Expression of Estrogen Receptors-{alpha} and -{beta} in the Pregnant Ovine Uterine Artery Endothelial Cells In Vivo and In Vitro
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 530 - 537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. J. Jakimiuk, S. R. Weitsman, H.-W. Yen, M. Bogusiewicz, and D. A. Magoffin
Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and {beta} Expression in Theca and Granulosa Cells from Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5532 - 5538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. A. LaVoie, D. C. DeSimone, C. Gillio-Meina, and Y. Y. Hui
Cloning and Characterization of Porcine Ovarian Estrogen Receptor {beta} Isoforms
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 616 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cárdenas, H.
Right arrow Articles by Nephew, K.P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS