Biol Reprod Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Biology of Reproduction 65, 689-695 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Cancellous and Cortical Bone Mechanical Properties and Tissue Dynamics During Pregnancy, Lactation, and Postlactation in the Rat1

Eric G. Vajdaa, Beth M. Bowmana, and Scott C. Miller2,a

a Division of Radiobiology, Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Utah,Salt Lake City, Utah 84108

ABSTRACT

There are substantial changes in maternal skeletal dynamics during pregnancy, lactation, and after lactation. The purpose of this study was to correlate changes in cortical and cancellous bone mass, structure, and dynamics with mechanical properties during and after the first reproductive cycle in rats. Rats were mated and groups were taken at parturition, end of lactation and 8 wk after weaning, and were compared with age-matched, nulliparous controls. Measurements were taken on femoral cortical bone and lumbar vertebral body cancellous bone. At the end of pregnancy, there was an increase in cortical periosteal bone formation and an increase in cortical volume, but a suppression of turnover in cancellous bone with no change in cancellous or cortical mechanical properties. Lactation was associated with a decrease in cortical and cancellous bone strength with a decrease in bone volume, but an increase in turnover on cancellous and endocortical surfaces. After lactation, there was a partial or full restoration of mechanical properties. This study demonstrates substantial changes in bone mechanics that correlate with changes in bone structure and dynamics during the first reproductive cycle in rats. The greatest changes were observed during the lactation period with partial or full recovery in the postlactational period.

calcium, lactation, parturition, pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

The female reproductive cycle substantially alters maternal mineral metabolism to meet the demands of the mineralizing fetus and to supply calcium for milk production. Although calcium homeostasis is altered during pregnancy, substantial bone loss does not typically occur, except in rare cases of pregnancy-induced osteoporosis [1]. During early pregnancy the intake and intestinal absorption of calcium is increased in many species, resulting in a positive calcium balance [24]. In rats, calcium retention during early pregnancy is associated with an increase in bone mass [5]. Changes in bone mass during early pregnancy are typically not significant in humans [6, 7], but a positive calcium balance exists [4]. It has been suggested that the early gain in bone mass may be a mechanism for storing calcium for the impending fetal skeletal mineralization process and for milk production.

In contrast to pregnancy, lactation results in substantial bone loss, particularly at cancellous bone sites. Humans [6, 810], rats [5, 11, 12], dogs [13, 14], sheep [15], pigs [16, 17], and monkeys [18] demonstrate varying degrees of bone loss during lactation. The decrease in bone mass is transient, however, and bone mass appears to be at least partially restored after weaning in both humans [6, 19] and rats [12]. Studies in humans suggest that lactation does not increase later fracture risk and may even have a protective effect [20]. Fox et al. [21], for example, reported that bone mass increased by 1.4% at the distal forearm for each pregnancy. There is, however, recent concern about the effects of pregnancy on peak bone mass in adolescents [22].

Histomorphometric studies in rats [5, 2325] and dogs [13, 14, 26] indicate that bone turnover is significantly elevated during lactation with a greater increase in bone resorption than bone formation. Rats, in particular, have very pronounced bone loss during the first lactation, with cancellous bone volume decreased by as much as 79% at the proximal tibia [524]. These decreases are greater than the bone loss observed following estrogen deficiency or immobilization in the rat [24]. Despite the dramatic bone loss, bone mass is rapidly restored after weaning in rats, particularly after the first reproductive cycle [12, 25].

There are few data explaining how the rapid loss and subsequent gain of bone mass affects bone mechanics. Most previous investigations have reported the effects of pregnancy and lactation on bone mechanics at cortical bone sites [2733], but do not report on the postlactational period. A few studies suggest that cortical bone strength is only partially recovered following lactation [29, 31], which is in contrast to fracture risk in humans. There are limited data regarding changes in cancellous bone mechanics throughout the reproductive cycle. Although cancellous bone mass is at least partially restored after lactation, bone architecture may be altered as a result of the dramatic bone loss [5, 12]. For example, perforations in bone trabeculae may result in an irreversible loss of connectivity leading to decreased bone strength and stiffness. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of pregnancy, lactation, and recovery on bone mechanics and turnover at both cortical and cancellous bone sites in rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals

Female Sprague-Dawley rats (Simonsen, Gilroy, CA) were allowed to acclimate to housing conditions and a daily photoperiod of 14L:10D for 5 days. Rats were fed standard laboratory rodent chow (#8640, Harland Teklad, Madison, WI) and water ad libitum. The diet contained 1.17% calcium, 1.0% phosphorus, and 6 IU/g of vitamin D. Rats were randomly divided into six groups; each experimental group contained six to eight rats that were approximately 90 days old at the start of the experiment. Three of the groups were mated and allowed to carry their pups to parturition. Rats from the first group were killed at parturition (about 120 days of age). Rats from the second group were allowed to complete a 21-day lactation and were killed at weaning (about 142 days of age). The third group was allowed to recover from lactation and the animals were killed 8 wk after weaning (about 200 days of age). At each of these times, a group of age-matched, nulliparous animals was killed and served as controls.

All animals received i.p. injections of the fluorochrome bone markers, calcein and tetracycline. Animals were given calcein (fluorescein-methylene iminodiacetic acid, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at a dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight 8 days prior to necropsy. Tetracycline-HCl (Sigma) was administered 1 day prior to necropsy at a dose of 25 mg/kg of body weight.

Mechanical Testing of Cancellous and Cortical Bone

The right femur and sixth lumbar vertebra were removed at necropsy, wrapped in saline-soaked gauze, frozen, and stored. Specimens were thawed at room temperature in a saline bath prior to mechanical testing. One endplate from each of the sixth lumbar vertebra was mounted on an aluminum stub using a cyanoacrylate glue. The stub was placed in a low-speed bone saw (Isomet; Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL), and two plane parallel cuts were made, removing the endplates from the vertebral body [34]. Some drying of the specimen is likely to have occurred during the gluing process, but specimens were fully rehydrated during sectioning and subsequent mechanical testing. Drying and rewetting bone tissue is reported to have minimal influence on bone mechanical properties [35]. A compressive load was applied along the cranio-caudal axis at a rate of 2 mm/min until failure. Maximum load and flexural rigidity were measured from the load-deformation curve for each specimen.

The femora were placed in a materials testing system (Instron, Canton, MA) and loaded to failure in three-point bending. The central load support was applied to the anterior surface of the midfemoral diaphysis at a loading rate of 10 mm/min. Maximum load, flexural rigidity, and work-to-fracture were measured from the load-deformation curve. Elastic modulus and maximum stress were calculated based on standard engineering equations for three-point bending [36].

Tissue Preparation for Morphometry

The destructive nature of mechanical testing precludes any further analysis of these tissues. To investigate changes in skeletal morphometry and dynamics the contralateral (left) femur and lumbar vertebrae 1 through 3 were collected at necropsy, cleaned of soft tissue, dehydrated in ascending concentrations of ethanol, and embedded undecalcified in methyl methacrylate. Comparisons between contralateral limbs and among vertebral bodies is generally believed to be valid as these intraanimal variations are typically very small. Mid-diaphyseal transverse sections of the femur and longitudinal sections of the lumbar vertebrae were cut on a low-speed bone saw mounted on plastic slides, and ground to approximately 30 µm in thickness. Some sections of the lumbar vertebral bodies were stained by the von Kossa reaction for image analyses.

Histomorphometry of Cancellous Bone

Structural analyses were done using digitized (binary) images captured from von Kossa-stained sections of the vertebral bodies. This was performed using a semiautomated television microscope system [13] and structural analyses were performed using a bone structure program (KSS Computer Consultants, Magna, UT) as used by us in other bone structure studies in the rat [37]. The indices collected were the percentage of total tissue area occupied by bone (% bone) and the perimeter-to area-ratio (Pm/Ar) of the trabecular elements. The Pm/Ar ratio is a measure of trabecular thickness.

For measurements of bone formation indices, a 3.6 mm2 area of vertebral body cancellous bone was measured using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with a camera lucida attachment and a digitizing tablet interfaced with a microcomputer (Apple SE, Cupertino, CA) running histomorphometry software (KSS Scientific Consultants, Magna, UT). The indices measured included the percentage of single fluorochrome-labeled surface, percentage of double fluorochrome-labeled surface, percentage of mineralizing surface, mineral apposition rate (MAR), and the surface- and volume-referent bone formation rates (BFRs and BFRv, respectively). The mineralizing surface was calculated as the doubled-labeled surface plus one-half of the single-labeled surface. The MAR was corrected for section obliquity. The histomorphometric methods and indices are in accordance with standardized procedures and nomenclature [38].

Histomorphometry of Cortical Bone

Structural and dynamic histomorphometric measurements were made on the cross-sections of the mid-diaphyseal femoral shaft and included measurements on both the endocortical and periosteal surfaces. The structural measurements included the total cortical cross-sectional area, the average cortical thickness, the area of the marrow or medullary cavity, and the perimeters of the periosteal and endocortical surfaces.

On the periosteal and endocortical surfaces, histomorphometric indices included the percentage of single-, double-, and mineralizing-surface, the MAR, and the BFRs and BFRv. In many animals from some groups, the endocortical surfaces contained no visible double labels, therefore MAR and BFR are reported only for periosteal surfaces.

Statistical Analysis

Comparisons between experimental groups and nulliparous controls were performed with a Student t-test at each time point. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mechanical Testing of Cancellous and Cortical Bone

Maximum compressive load of the lumbar vertebrae showed a transient decrease associated with the reproductive cycle (Fig. 1a). Maximum load was not significantly changed at parturition, but decreased substantially during lactation (64% decrease; P < 0.0001) relative to nulliparous controls. However, by 8 wk after lactation, the bone strength had recovered to near control values. A similar pattern was observed with vertebral flexural rigidity (Fig. 1b): no change at parturition, a significant decline at weaning (56% decrease; P < 0.01), and full recovery 8 wk after weaning. Work-to-fracture remained unchanged at parturition and weaning, but was slightly decreased in mated rats after recovery (Table 1).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effects of pregnancy, lactation, and recovery on bone mechanics in the rat: vertebral strength (a), vertebral stiffness (b), femoral strength (c), and femoral stiffness (d)


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Mechanical property of work to fracture (workfracture) of the maternal rat vertebra (cancellous bone) and femur (cortical bone) at parturition, weaning, and 8 wk after weaning (recovery).*

Maximum bending load of the diaphyseal cortical bone of the femur followed a temporal pattern similar to that observed at the lumbar vertebrae (Fig. 1c). Maximum load of the femur was not significantly different between parturition and nulliparous control rats. Maximum load was, however, significantly reduced (26% lower; P < 0.001) in lactating rats at weaning compared with control rats. By the end of an 8-wk recovery period, maximum load had increased, but remained significantly lower than control values (16% lower; P < 0.001). Flexural rigidity was unchanged at parturition, significantly declined at weaning (27% decrease; P < 0.01), and returned to control values by the end of recovery (Fig. 1d). Work-to-fracture remained unchanged at all three time points (Table 1).

Structure and Dynamics of Cancellous Bone

Some of the structural features of the lumbar cancellous bone are presented in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 2. There was no difference in the percentage of bone at the end of parturition, but as expected, the percentage of bone was significantly less at the end of weaning compared with the nulliparous controls. At 8 wk after weaning (recovery), the amount of cancellous bone had increased and there was no significant difference from controls. The perimeter/area ratios were unchanged at parturition but were significantly elevated at the end of weaning compared with the controls (Table 2). This indicates that the trabecular elements are thinner. At 8 wk after lactation, this had reversed such that the perimeter/area ratios were significantly less compared with controls, which is indicative of thicker trabeculae.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2. Structural properties of maternal lumbar vertebral body cancellous bone at parturition, weaning, and 8 wk after weaning (recovery)



View larger version (172K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Photomicrographs of lumbar vertebra from rats at parturition (b), weaning (d), and 8 wk after weaning (f) and their respective nulliparous controls (a, c, and e). Bone loss is apparent at weaning (d), but is restored 8 wk later (f). Von Kossa-stained sections; original magnification x11

The reproductive cycle significantly altered normal bone formation rates and turnover in the rat lumbar vertebral body. At the end of pregnancy, all of the indices of bone formation were significantly less than the age-matched, nulliparous controls (Table 3). This would suggest a reduction of bone turnover at the end of pregnancy. After lactation, however, all indices of bone formation rates were significantly greater than those observed in the controls, which is indicative of higher bone turnover rates. At 8 wk after weaning (recovery), none of the indices of bone formation and turnover were significantly different from the controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 3. Histomorphometric indices of cancellous bone dynamics at the lumbar vertebral bodies at parturition, weaning, and 8 wk after weaning (recovery)

Structure and Dynamics of Cortical Bone

Some of the structural features of mid-diaphyseal femoral cortical bone are presented in Table 4. The average cortical cross-sectional area was significantly greater at the end of pregnancy than in the nulliparous controls. None of the other structural indices were significantly different at this time. At weaning, the average cortical cross-sectional area and the average cortical cross-sectional width were less than controls and remained less than controls at 8 wk after weaning. The periosteal circumference perimeter was slightly, but significantly less at this same time, compared with controls.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 4. Structural properties of maternal femoral cortical bone at parturition, weaning, and 8 wk after weaning (recovery)

Bone formation indices taken from the periosteal and endocortical surfaces are presented in Table 5. At the end of pregnancy, the percentages of double-labeled surface, mineralizing surface, and surface- and volume-referent bone formation rates were greater than in the nulliparous controls. The opposite was observed on the endocortical surfaces with most indices of bone formation less than those observed in the controls. Double fluorochrome markers were observed in only two of the seven animals at this time, whereas double markers were observed in all of the control animals. Mineral appositional and bone formation rates could be calculated only from these two animals in the parturition group. The mineral appositional rates were about the same as those observed in the controls (data not shown), whereas the bone formation rates in the two animals were less than the mean from the controls (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 5. Histomorphometric indices of femoral cortical bone at parturition, weaning, and 8 wk after weaning (recovery)

At weaning, bone formation activity on the periosteal surface had reversed from that seen at the end of pregnancy (Table 5). The percentage of double-labeled surface, percentage of mineralizing surface, and surface- and volume-referent bone formation rates on the periosteal surface were less than in the nulliparous controls. On the other hand, the percentage of single-labeled surface on the endocortical surface was greater than in the controls. At 8 wk after weaning, there were no significant differences in any of the bone formation and turnover indices at the periosteal or the endocortical surfaces.

DISCUSSION

There are significant changes in bone turnover, structure, and mechanical properties during the first reproductive cycle in the rat. Consistent with previous reports, periosteal bone formation rates were increased at the end of pregnancy [5] and this may have led to the greater average cortical cross-sectional area observed at this time. It is also known that endochondral bone elongation increases during pregnancy, particularly early to midpregnancy, and the increase in periosteal bone formation may be coupled with this increase in bone elongation to maintain the normal dimensionality of the bone [39, 40]. It has been suggested that the increase in endochondral and periosteal growth during pregnancy may be adaptive mechanisms to protect the maternal skeleton for the mineral requirements of the developing fetus and later for milk production during lactation. Contrarily, some indices of bone formation were decreased on the endocortical surface at the end of pregnancy. There were, however, no significant differences in the mechanical properties of the cortical bone at the end of pregnancy, indicating that the changes that occurred on the cortical periosteal and endocortical surfaces during pregnancy had no net effect on bone mechanics.

Similar to the changes on the endocortical surface at the end of pregnancy, some indices of bone formation were less on the endosteal cancellous bone surfaces of the lumbar vertebral bodies at this time. There were, however, no changes in bone volume, average trabecular thickness, or mechanical properties. Cancellous bone formation rates are elevated in early to midpregnancy in the rat [5] and perhaps some bone changes occur in early to midpregnancy that are reversed in later pregnancy as the fetal skeleton draws mineral from the maternal skeleton. Tojo et al. [41] also reported suppressed bone formation rates in the lumbar vertebral cancellous bone at the end of pregnancy in rats. However, they also observed a modest decrease in the amount of trabecular bone that correlated with an increase in bone resorption, which is likely associated with fetal skeletal mineralization in late pregnancy. In humans, there are some reports of an increase in bone turnover in late pregnancy that may be associated with some decreases in bone mineral density [42].

There were significant changes in skeletal dynamics, structure, and strength at the time of weaning. In cancellous bone, all indices of bone formation and turnover were significantly greater at the end of lactation. These included indices of bone formation and turnover and the mineral appositional rate. The high turnover of cancellous bone during lactation has been observed in other studies in rats, dogs [5, 1214], and primates [43]. The higher bone turnover mechanism during lactation may ensure a readily available supply of mineral for milk production [26]. The loss of cancellous bone during lactation in rats is well documented, and a loss of bone mineral density during lactation has been observed in humans [610]. The structural changes that occurred during lactation in cancellous bone likely were the cause of the changes in mechanical properties. Some reductions in cancellous bone mechanical properties during lactation have been reported in the pig [17] but we are unaware of any other data from other species.

Although lactation is known to result in decreases in bone mass and, as demonstrated in the present study, some decreases in biomechanical properties, it is rarely associated with an increase in skeletal fractures or pathological osteopenia in humans. Some studies in humans suggest that the loss of bone mineral density and associated changes in mineral metabolism are "obligatory" in that they are independent of dietary calcium intake [44, 45].

There are rapid gains in bone mineral density after lactation in humans that at least partially restore the skeletal mass loss during lactation [6, 19]. This has also been observed in primates [43] and in rats [12]. We have recently reported that within the first several weeks after weaning in rats, there are substantial increases in bone formation rates that contribute to the rebuilding and restructuring of skeletal mass [25]. The data from the present study show that this postlactational "anabolic" period also restores bone mechanical properties. In the cortical bone of the femur, the mechanical properties were substantially improved over those observed at the end of lactation, but did remain less than those observed in nulliparous controls at 8 wk after weaning. This may not be the case in subsequent reproductive cycles in the rat, because there is evidence that the nulliparous rat has a skeletal mass in excess of that needed for its normal mechanical usage [12]. The first reproductive cycle in the rat is considered to be metabolically "inefficient" [46] and this excess in skeletal mass may be useful in protecting the maternal skeleton during the first reproductive cycle. Thus, in subsequent reproductive cycles, there may be more a complete restoration of skeletal mechanics in the postlactational period. The first reproductive cycle was examined in the present study to allow for comparison with previous work, most of which analyzed the first reproductive cycle. Future investigations into later reproductive cycles in the rat may provide additional insights into the relationship between bone mechanics, turnover, and lactation.

There was a substantial decrease in strength of the lumbar vertebral cancellous bone at the end of lactation, but by 8 wk after weaning it had been restored to levels comparable to controls. Cancellous bone formation rates are rapidly and substantially elevated soon after weaning [25], and this likely contributed to the improvements in cancellous bone mass and structure that were observed after the recovery period. For example, at 8 wk after weaning there was a substantial increase in bone mass (% bone) and a decrease in the Pm/Ar ratios indicative of a thickening of the individual trabeculae. The increased cancellous bone mass and thicker trabeculae would help account for the improvement in mechanical properties after lactation.

The endocrine mechanisms involved in altered bone mechanics during the reproductive cycle are not clear. Dramatic changes in pituitary and ovarian hormones occur during pregnancy and the postpartum period, but none of these have been conclusively linked with changes in bone dynamics. Late pregnancy is associated with a reduction in blood ionized calcium levels in rats and a corresponding increase in the calciotrophic hormones 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin-D (1,25-D), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and calcitonin [47]. The combined influence of these endocrine fluctuations are likely to be small, however, as pregnancy had minimal influence on bone mechanics in the present study.

In contrast, lactation resulted in substantial increases in bone turnover and decreases in bone strength. Numerous endocrine factors could be responsible for these alterations. PTH and vitamin D levels are elevated during lactation in the rat [48], but studies suggest that lactation-induced bone loss is independent of PTH and vitamin D levels [49]. Lactation is also a hypoestrogenic state, and the increased bone turnover and bone loss in lactation is consistent with observations of cancellous bone loss and turnover in ovariectomized rats [24] and dogs [50]. Ovariectomized rats, however, have marked differences in cortical bone dynamics and growth plate kinetics relative to lactating rats [24]. PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) has also been considered as a possible endocrine mediator involved in increased bone turnover during lactation [47]. Mammary secretion of PTHrP is increased during lactation leading to elevated PTHrP levels in maternal serum. Sera levels of PTHrP are negatively correlated with changes in bone mineral density in the spine and femoral neck in humans [51], but no direct link has been established.

The endocrine factors involved in the postlactational recovery period are poorly understood. Relatively few studies have examined this phase of the reproductive cycle, and data have not been correlated with skeletal dynamics. This is of particular interest as this represents one of the most potent "anabolic" phases reported in the adult skeleton.

In summary, this study demonstrates substantial changes in bone mechanical properties during and after the first reproductive cycle in rats. There were substantial decreases in cortical and cancellous bone strength after lactation that correlated with changes in bone structure and dynamics. After lactation, however, there was a rebuilding of both cortical and cancellous bone that resulted in greatly improved mechanical properties. These data demonstrate that the postlactational bone-forming period also greatly improves the mechanical properties of both cortical and cancellous bone.

FOOTNOTES

First decision: 25 January 2001.

1 This work was supported by grant AR-44806 from the National Institutes of Health. Back

2 Correspondence: Scott C. Miller, Center for Advanced Medical Technologies, 729 Arapeen Dr., Suite 2334, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1218. FAX: 801 581 7008; scott.miller{at}hsc.utah.edu Back

Accepted: April 10, 2001.

Received: December 4, 2000.

REFERENCES

  1. Phillips AJ, Ostlere SJ, Smith R. Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: does the skeleton recover?. Osteoporos Int 2000; 11:449-454[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Brommage R, Baxter DC. Elevated calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium retention in pregnant rats prior to the onset of fetal skeletal mineralization. J Bone Miner Res 1988; 3:667-672[Medline]
  3. Goss H, Schmidt CLA. Calcium and phosphorus metabolism in rats during pregnancy and lactation and the influence of the reaction of the diet thereon. J Biol Chem 1930; 86:417-432[Free Full Text]
  4. Heaney RP, Skillman TG. Calcium metabolism in normal human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1971; 33:661-670[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Miller SC, Shupe JG, Redd EH, Miller MA, Omura TH. Changes in bone mineral and bone formation rates during pregnancy and lactation in rats. Bone 1986; 7:283-287[Medline]
  6. Ritchie LD, Fung EB, Halloran BP, Turnlund JR, Van Loan MD, Cann CE, King JC. A longitudinal study of calcium homeostasis during human pregnancy and lactation and after resumption of menses. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 67:693-701[Abstract]
  7. Sowers M. Pregnancy and lactation as risk factors for subsequent bone loss and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1996; 11:1052-1060[Medline]
  8. Hayslip CC, Klein TA, Wray HL, Duncan WE. The effects of lactation on bone mineral content in healthy postpartum women. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:588-592[Medline]
  9. Kalkwarf HJ, Specker BL, Bianchi DC, Ranz J, Ho M. The effect of calcium supplementation on bone density during lactation and after weaning. N Engl J Med 1997; 337:523-528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Krebs NF, Reidinger CJ, Robertson AD, Brenner M. Bone mineral density changes during lactation: maternal, dietary, and biochemical correlates. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 65:1738-1746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zeni SN, Di Gregorio S, Mautalen C. Bone mass changes during pregnancy and lactation in the rat. Bone 1999; 25:681-685[Medline]
  12. Bowman BM, Miller SC. Skeletal mass, chemistry, and growth during and after multiple reproductive cycles in the rat. Bone 1999; 25:553-559[Medline]
  13. Miller MA, Omura TH, Miller SC. Increased cancellous bone remodeling during lactation in beagles. Bone 1989; 10:279-285[Medline]
  14. Fukuda S, Iida H. Histomorphometric changes in iliac trabecular bone during pregnancy and lactation in beagle dogs. J Vet Med Sci 1993; 55:565-569[Medline]
  15. Benzie D, Boyne AD, Dalgarno AC, Duckworth J, Hill R, Walker DM. Studies of the skeleton of the sheep. I. The effect of different levels of dietary calcium during pregnancy and lactation on individual bones. J Agric Sci 1955; 46:425-444
  16. Spencer GR. Pregnancy and lactational osteoporosis. Animal model: porcine lactational osteoporosis. Am J Pathol 1979; 95:277-280[Medline]
  17. Giesemann MA, Lewis AJ, Miller PS, Akhter MP. Effects of the reproductive cycle and age on calcium and phosphorus metabolism and bone integrity of sows. J Anim Sci 1998; 76:796-807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hiyaoka A, Yoshida T, Cho F, Yoshikawa Y. Changes in bone mineral density of lumbar vertebrae after parturition in African green monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Exp Anim 1996; 45:257-259[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Specker B, Tsang RC, Ho ML. Changes in calcium homeostasis over the first year postpartum: effect of lactation and weaning. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 78:56-62[Medline]
  20. Aloia JF, Cohn SH, Vaswani A, Yeh JK, Yuen K, Ellis K. Risk factors for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Am J Med 1985; 78:95-100[Medline]
  21. Fox KM, Magaziner J, Sherwin R, Scott JC, Plato CC, Nevitt M, Cummings S. Reproductive correlates of bone mass in elderly women. J Bone Miner Res 1993; 8:901-908[Medline]
  22. Lloyd T, Taylor D, Lin H, Matthews A, Eggli D, Legro R. Teenage mothers have decreased peak hip BMD: a longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: (suppl) S418 (abstract)
  23. Marie PJ, Cancela L, LeBoulch N, Miravet L. Bone changes due to pregnancy and lactation: influence of vitamin D status. Am J Physiol 1986; 251:E400-E406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Miller SC, Bowman BM. Comparison of bone loss during normal lactation with estrogen deficiency osteopenia and immobilization osteopenia in the rat. Anat Rec 1998; 25:265-274
  25. Bowman BM, Miller SC. Skeletal adaptations during mammalian reproduction. J Musculoskel Neuron Interaction 2001; (in press)
  26. Vajda EG, Kneissel M, Muggenburg B, Miller SC. Increased intracortical bone remodeling during lactation in beagle dogs. Biol Reprod 1999; 61:1439-1444[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Currey JD. Interactions between age, pregnancy and lactation, and some mechanical properties, of the femora of rats. Calcif Tissue Res 1973; 13:99-112[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Currey JD, Hughes SM. The effects of pregnancy and lactation on some mechanical properties of the femora of the rat. Calcif Tissue Res 1973; 11:112-123[Medline]
  29. Peng TC, Kusy RP, Garner SC, Hirsch PF, De Blanco MC. Influence of lactation and pregnancy+lactation on mechanical properties and mineral content of the rat femur. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2:249-257[Medline]
  30. Peng TC, Garner SC, Kusy RP, Hirsch PF. Effect of number of suckling pups and dietary calcium on bone mineral content and mechanical properties of femurs of lactating rats. Bone Miner 1988; 3:293-304[Medline]
  31. Kusy RP, Peng TC, Hirsch PF, Garner SC. Interrelationships of bone ash and whole bone properties in the lactating and parous rat. Calcif Tissue Int 1987; 41:337-341[Medline]
  32. Leopold SS, Boskey AL, Doty SB, Gertner JM, Peterson MG, Torzilli PA. Diminished material properties and altered bone structure in rat femora during pregnancy. J Orthop Res 1995; 13:41-49[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Glade MJ. Effects of gestation, lactation, and maternal calcium intake on mechanical strength of equine bone. J Am Coll Nutr 1993; 12:372-377[Abstract]
  34. Mosekilde L, Thomsen JS, Orhii PB, Kalu DN. Growth hormone increases vertebral and femoral bone strength in osteopenic, ovariectomized, aged rats in a dose-dependent and site-specific manner. Bone 1998; 23:343-352[Medline]
  35. Currey JD. The effects of drying and re-wetting on some mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 1988; 21:439-441[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Turner CH, Burr DB. Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial. Bone 1993; 14:595-608[Medline]
  37. Miller SC, Wronski TJ. Long-term osteopenic changes in cancellous bone structure in ovariectomized rats. Anat Rec 1993; 236:433-441[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR. Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2:595-610[Medline]
  39. Redd EH, Miller SC, Jee WSS. Changes in endochondral bone elongation rates during pregnancy and lactation in rats. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36:697-701[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Bowman BM, Miller SC. Endochondral bone growth during early pregnancy compared with pseudopregnancy in rats. Endocrine 1997; 6:173-177[Medline]
  41. Tojo Y, Kurabayashi T, Honda A, Yamamoto Y, Yahata T, Takakuwa K, Tanaka K. Bone structural and metabolic changes at the end of pregnancy and lactation in rats. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:180-185[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Naylor KE, Iqbal P, Fledelius C, Fraser RB, Eastell R. The effect of pregnancy on bone density and bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15:129-137[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Lees CJ, Jerome CP, Register TC, Carson CS. Changes in bone mass and bone biomarkers of cynomolgus monkeys during pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:4298-4302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Kalkwarf HJ. Hormonal and dietary regulation of changes in bone density during lactation and after weaning in women. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 1999; 4:319-329[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Prentice A, Jarjou LM, Stirling DM, Buffenstein R, Fairweather-Tait S. Biochemical markers of calcium and bone metabolism during 18 months of lactation in Gambian women accustomed to a low calcium intake and in those consuming a calcium supplement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998; 83:1059-1066[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kunkele J, Kenagy GJ. Inefficiency of lactation in primiparous rats: the costs of first reproduction. Physiol Zool 1997; 70:571-577[Medline]
  47. Kovacs CS, Kronenberg HM. Maternal-fetal calcium and bone metabolism during pregnancy, puerperium, and lactation. Endocr Rev 1997; 18:832-872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Garner SC, Peng TC, Hirsch PF, Boass A, Toverud S. Increase in serum parathyroid hormone concentration in the lactating rat: effects of dietary calcium and lactational intensity. J Bone Miner Res 1987; 2:347-352[Medline]
  49. Brommage R, DeLuca HF. Regulation of bone mineral loss during lactation. Am J Physiol 1985; 248:E182-E187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Wilson AK, Bhattacharyva MH, Miller S, Mani A, Sacco-Gibson N. Ovariectomy-induced changes in aged beagles: histomorphometry of rib cortical bone. Calcif Tissue Int 1998; 62:237-243[CrossRef][Medline]
  51. Sowers MF, Hollis BW, Shapiro B, Randolph J, Janney CA, Zhang D, Schork MA, Crutchfield M, Stanczyk F, Russell-Aulet M. Elevated parathyroid hormone-related peptide associated with lactation and bone density loss. JAMA 1996; 276:549-554[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. R Speakman
The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals
Phil Trans R Soc B, January 27, 2008; 363(1490): 375 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
J. J. Wysolmerski
Conversations Between Breast and Bone: Physiological Bone Loss During Lactation as Evolutionary Template for Osteolysis in Breast Cancer and Pathological Bone Loss After Menopause
IBMS BoneKEy, August 1, 2007; 4(8): 209 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
L. Ardeshirpour, P. Dann, D. J. Adams, T. Nelson, J. VanHouten, M. C. Horowitz, and J. J. Wysolmerski
Weaning Triggers a Decrease in Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Ligand Expression, Widespread Osteoclast Apoptosis, and Rapid Recovery of Bone Mass after Lactation in Mice
Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3875 - 3886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
S. C. Miller, B. L. Anderson, and B. M. Bowman
Weaning Initiates a Rapid and Powerful Anabolic Phase in the Rat Maternal Skeleton
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2005; 73(1): 156 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. N. VanHouten and J. J. Wysolmerski
Low Estrogen and High Parathyroid Hormone-Related Peptide Levels Contribute to Accelerated Bone Resorption and Bone Loss in Lactating Mice
Endocrinology, December 1, 2003; 144(12): 5521 - 5529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Vajda, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, S. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS