Biol Reprod Keystone Symposia Conference on Frontiers in Reproductive Biology & Regulation of Fertility.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.
Biology of Reproduction 65, 1794-1799 (2001)
© 2001 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Ooplasmic Influence on Nuclear Function During the Metaphase II-Interphase Transition in Mouse Oocytes

Hui Liua, Lewis C. Krey1,a, John Zhanga, and Jamie A. Grifoa

a Program for In Vitro Fertilization, Reproductive Surgery and Infertility, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Nuclear and pronuclear transfer procedures were used to assess the functional competence of the nucleus and cytoplasm of mouse germinal vesicle-stage oocytes denuded of granulosa cells and matured in vitro or in vivo before artificial activation using a sequential treatment of A23187 + cycloheximide. Following activation, in vitro-matured oocytes were "fertilized" by inserting a male pronucleus (PN), cultured to the 2-cell stage, and then transferred to the oviducts of foster mothers. No live births were noted, whereas a 17% live birth rate was observed when in vivo-matured oocytes were used. The developmental competency of other zygotes was similarly assessed following the exchange of haploid PN of matured and activated eggs with the female PN of fertilized zygotes. When PN of oocytes subjected to maturation and activation in vitro were transferred, only 1 of 79 reconstructed zygotes developed to term. In contrast, the live birth rate was 21% (11 of 53) for zygotes reconstructed with PN from in vivo-matured oocytes. Moreover, a live birth rate of 23% (8 of 35) was observed for reconstructed zygotes with female PN from "hybrid" oocytes created by transferring the metaphase II nuclei of in vitro-matured oocytes into enucleated, in vivo-matured oocytes before activation. Such results suggest that the nucleus of an in vitro-matured oocyte can support embryonic development, but only when it is activated in the proper ooplasmic milieu. The cellular factors creating this ooplasmic milieu appear to develop normally in vivo during follicle maturation to metaphase II, but they fail to do so when the oocytes are denuded of granulosa cells and cultured in vitro before the final stages of maturation. In parallel studies, male and female PN of in vivo-fertilized zygotes were inserted into oocytes that were activated and enucleated following either in vitro or in vivo maturation. Live birth rates were comparable at 19% (5 of 27) and 18% (9 of 49), respectively, suggesting that, regardless of the environment of the final stages of oocyte maturation, the resultant ooplasm is competent to support all aspects of embryonic development once activation and PN formation has been completed. Such findings only point further toward the importance of the condition of the ooplasmic milieu at the time of chemical activation. Whether a similar situation exists when eggs are activated following sperm penetration remains to be determined.

fertilization, gametogenesis, ovum


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In human, mouse, and other mammalian species, germinal vesicle (GV)-stage oocytes can spontaneously undergo normal meiosis and mature in vitro. However, the locale of oocyte maturation appears to have a long-term effect on the potential of the oocyte to support normal embryonic development [1, 2]. In the ovary, cumulus-enclosed oocytes progress from GV to metaphase II (M-II) in the preovulatory follicle, and this transition is initiated by the periovulatory gonadotropin surge, which also produces other major changes in the egg's microenvironment. However, cumulus cell contact during oocyte maturation in vitro is not a necessary condition for the oocyte to complete nuclear maturation. Nonetheless, maintaining the oocyte-cumulus complex during in vitro maturation may promote the acquisition of embryo developmental competence [35].

Numerous studies of GV maturation have utilized recipient ooplasts created from enucleated, cumulus-denuded oocytes [68]. However, embryos generated from reconstructed oocytes that had matured in vitro in the absence of cumulus cells from the GV stage onward displayed poor progression to morula- or blastocyst-stage embryo development and poor embryo morphology [9]. Recently, Kono et al. [10] reported that a GV from a fully grown, immature oocyte supports embryonic and fetal development to term when, following completion of the first meiotic division in the absence of cumulus-enclosed cells, it is transferred to and activated in the cytoplasm of an enucleated oocyte that had matured in vivo. The GV from a growing oocyte (diameter, ~60 µm) has been reported to be similarly competent [11]. These observations suggest that cytoplasmic factors may account for a decline in embryonic developmental potential when oocytes are denuded of their cumuli and are matured in vitro. In this study, we assessed individually the role of the nucleus and cytoplasm of mouse oocytes denuded of cumulus cells and matured in vitro to determine the potential for normal embryonic development.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The CB6F1 mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used to generate the oocytes and zygotes in this study. CD-1 mice were used as foster pseudopregnant mothers. The culture media used in this study, Hepes-buffered modified HTF and HTF (Irvine Scientific, Irvine, CA) and S1 (Scandinavian IVF Science, Gothenburg, Sweden), were selected for egg harvesting, in vitro maturation, and early embryonic culture because they maximized the potential for normal embryonic development [9]. Unless otherwise noted, media were supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FCS; HyClone, Logan, UT).

Recovery of In Vitro- and In Vivo-Matured Oocytes and Fertilized Zygotes

Female mice (age, 6–8 wk) were injected i.p. with 5 IU of eCG (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). One group was killed by cervical dislocation 48 h after eCG to collect denuded GV-stage oocytes, which were then cultured in vitro to M-II (in vitro-matured oocytes). A second group was injected with 5 IU of hCG (Sigma) at 48 h after eCG and then killed 16–18 h later to collect M-II oocytes (in vivo-matured oocytes). A final group of mice was mated immediately after hCG injection and killed 22 h later to collect fertilized zygotes.

Cumulus-denuded, GV-stage oocytes were collected from each ovary by puncturing the follicles with a needle in Hepes-HTF. The oocytes were stripped of cumulus cells by repeated gentle pipetting. After washing in Hepes-HTF, the cumulus-denuded oocytes were then transferred to HTF containing 50 µg/ml of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (Sigma) and cultured for 4 h in an incubator (5% CO2 in air, 37°C). Oocytes with a diameter of approximately 80 µm and a visible perivitelline space were selected for a final 16-h maturation culture in HTF.

The M-II oocytes and zygotes were harvested from ampullae of excised fallopian tubes. Cumulus cells were removed by pipetting during a brief exposure to serum-free Hepes-HTF containing 300 IU/ml of hyaluronidase (Sigma).

Artificial Activation of In Vivo- and In Vitro-Matured Oocytes

In vivo- and in vitro-matured, M-II oocytes were activated as previously described [9, 12]. After incubation in Dulbecco PBS (Irvine Scientific) containing 3 µM Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature, the oocytes were rinsed and cultured for 4–5 h in HTF containing 5 µg/ml of cycloheximide (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Aurora, OH). The oocytes were then monitored under a dissection microscope for polar body extrusion and pronucleus (PN) formation 1 and 4 h later, respectively. Oocytes that displayed a second polar body and a single PN at these times were used.

Reconstructing Zygotes

Activated oocytes and in vivo-fertilized zygotes were placed in a micromanipulation droplet overlaid with oil. After preincubation in HEPES-HTF containing 7.5 µg/ml of cytochalasin B (Sigma) for 15 min at 30°C, the cells were subjected to micromanipulation. When reconstructing a zygote, the crucial step is to distinguish the female from the male PN in the fertilized zygotes. In each independent experiment, we pooled, in one dish, numerous zygotes from more than three superovulated and mated mice. We micromanipulated only those zygotes in which the female PN was in close proximity to the second polar body but also at a distinct distance from the male PN [1214]. To remove the female PN, the zona pellucida was pierced with a sharp glass needle near the second polar body. An injection pipette was then passed through the slit to aspirate the female PN; in many instances, female PN manipulation triggered similar movements of the second polar body. The male PN was identified and then removed by aspiration. The PN for transfer were then inserted into the perivitelline space of the recipient cell. The procedure for electrofusion of the recipient cytoplasts and the transferred karyoplast has been described elsewhere [6, 9]. A similar micromanipulation procedure was used to transfer the M-II spindle between oocytes; in mice, the spindle is easily visualized using Hoffman optics.

Following fusion, reconstructed zygotes were cultured in S1 at 37°C with 5% CO2 overnight and then transplanted to the oviducts of foster mother mice. Some embryos were subjected to cytogenetic analysis.

Experimental Design

Several types of reconstructed zygotes were made using pronuclear transfer. In vivo-type zygotes served as controls to assess the efficiency of the oviduct transfer procedure.

Type 1 zygotes Oocytes are matured in vivo or in vitro (Fig. 1A) and then artificially activated. The activated egg is then the recipient for the transfer of a male PN from a fertilized zygote.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Construction of type 1 (A), type 2 (B), type 3 (C), type 4 (D), and type 5 (E) zygotes. The site of oocyte maturation qualifies each zygote; for example, in vivo type 1 zygotes were constructed from oocytes that matured in vivo. Different shadings of cytoplasm are provided as a visual aid to monitor the origin of the cytoplasm. F and M in a circle indicate female and male pronucleus, respectively

Type 2 zygotes Oocytes are matured in vivo or in vitro (Fig. 1B) and then artificially activated. The resultant PN is then exchanged with the female PN of a fertilized zygote. Thus, type 2 zygotes compare the developmental capacities between artificially activated PN from eggs that matured in vivo or in vitro.

Type 3 zygotes Oocytes are matured in vivo or in vitro (Fig. 1C) and then artificially activated. The resultant PN is then removed and exchanged with male and female PN from a fertilized zygote. Thus, type 3 zygotes compare the functional competencies between activated cytoplasts from eggs that matured in vivo or in vitro.

Type 4 zygotes Oocytes are matured in vitro (Fig. 1D), and the resultant M-II spindles are removed and transferred to enucleated M-II cytoplasts from eggs that matured in vivo. The reconstructed oocytes are then artificially activated, and the resultant PN is then exchanged with the female PN of a fertilized zygote.

Type 5 zygotes Oocytes are matured in vitro (Fig. 1E), and the resultant M-II spindles are removed and transferred to enucleated M-II cytoplasts from eggs that matured in vivo. The reconstructed oocytes are then artificially activated and outfitted with a male PN transferred from a fertilized zygote.

Cytogenetic Analysis

Artificially activated oocytes with a single PN and reconstructed zygotes were cultured in S1 containing 1 µg/ml of nocodazole overnight at 37°C to produce metaphase arrest. Cells were fixed for cytogenetic analysis. Each oocyte was transferred into a 1% hypotonic trisodium citrate solution for 10 min before fixation with methanol:acetic acid (3:1 [w/v]) on a clean glass slide [15]. The chromosome spreads were air-dried, stained with a microdroplet of phosphate buffer containing 3 ng/ml of 4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vysis Inc., Downers Grove, IL), and then covered with a thin glass slide. The number and the structure of the chromosomes were visualized immediately using fluorescence microscopy; digital images were saved for computer analysis.

Embryo Transfer

Type 2 embryos were surgically transferred into oviducts of CD-1 foster mothers mated with vasectomized CD-1 males [16]. Types 3–5 embryos were transferred into each oviduct on Day 1 of pseudopregnancy (i.e., the day on which the copulation plug was found). Foster mothers carrying only one fetus were delivered by cesarean section at 20 days postcoitus.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using {chi}2 or Fisher exact probability tests when appropriate. Significance was determined at P < 0.05.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Activation Rates

The majority of denuded GV-stage oocytes extruded a first polar body (69%, 286 of 415). When allowed to mature in culture for 16–18 h following exposure to A23187 and cycloheximide, 257 of these 286 oocytes (90%) extruded a second polar body and formed a PN. Oocytes that matured to M-II in vivo responded to this treatment with polar body extrusion and PN formation at a similar rate (94%, 169 of 179).

Cytogenetic Analysis of Activated Oocytes and Reconstructed Zygotes

A uniform haploid complement of 20 chromosomes was noted in 33 of 37 oocytes that extruded a second polar body after in vitro maturation and activation (Fig. 2A). Oocytes that failed to extrude a second polar body displayed 40 chromosomes and were discarded (Fig. 2B). Although four activated oocytes had less than 20 chromosomes on analysis, each had overlapping chromosomes in the spread (Fig. 2C). In vitro type 2 zygotes (n = 10) were also subjected to cytogenetic analysis, and eight presented two haploid complements of 40 chromosomes (Fig. 2D).



View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Cytogenetic analysis of activated oocytes that matured in vitro (A–C) and a reconstructed zygote (D). A normal haploid complement with 20 chromosomes (A), an oocyte that failed to extrude the second polar body with 40 chromosomes (B), an oocyte with overlapping chromosomes in the spread (arrow) and less than 20 chromosomes (C), and a normal karyotype (40 chromosomes) prepared from in vitro type 1 zygote (D are also shown). The RNA staining is noted in each spread sample. Bar = 10 µm

Development of Type 1 Zygotes Derived from Oocytes Matured In Vivo or In Vitro

Birth rates were 17% (n = 30) (Table 1) for in vivo type 1 zygotes constructed by simply transferring male PN into oocytes matured in vivo after activation. In contrast, no pregnancies were observed in the nine foster mothers that received in vitro type 1 zygotes, even though the electrofusion and embryo cleavage rates before embryo transfer were comparable to those of the in vivo type 1 zygotes (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1. Reconstruction and development of zygotes

Development of Type 2 and 3 Zygotes Derived from Nucleus or Cytoplasm of Oocytes Matured In Vivo

We used in vivo type 2 and 3 zygotes to assess, respectively, the developmental capacities of the nuclei and cytoplasm derived from oocytes that had matured in vivo before activation. Construction of in vivo type 2 zygotes occurred without incident, and each zygote divided during overnight culture. All the cleaving embryos were transferred to the oviducts of seven pseudopregnant foster mothers. Six mice became pregnant and delivered a total of 11 normal, live offspring (Table 1). Construction of in vivo type 3 zygotes also proceeded routinely, and all fused zygotes cleaved during overnight culture. When transferred to oviducts of pseudopregnant foster mice, five normal, live offspring were generated by in vivo type 3 zygotes (Table 1). Significantly, no differences were found between the live birth rates generated by in vivo type 2 and 3 zygotes (21% vs. 18%). Thus, following chemical activation, the nuclei and cytoplasm of in vivo-matured oocytes are functionally competent to support embryonic development to term.

Development of Type 2 and 3 Zygotes Derived from Nucleus or Cytoplasm of In Vitro-Matured Oocytes

When in vitro type 2 zygotes were transferred, only 1 of 10 foster mothers became pregnant, bearing only a single pup. This live birth rate (1%) was significantly less than that generated by transfer of in vivo type 2 zygotes (21%) (Table 1). These results suggest that PN of oocytes matured and activated in vitro cannot support embryonic development to term and, thus, are functionally different from PN of oocytes matured in vivo. However, different results were obtained when we tested the cytoplasm of oocytes that matured in vitro. When 49 embryos derived from in vitro type 3 zygotes were transferred to the oviducts of six foster mothers, five became pregnant, bearing nine live pups (18%) (Table 1). This pregnancy rate was no different than that of in vivo type 3 zygotes.

Development of Type 4 and 5 Zygotes Constructed with Nuclei of In Vitro-Matured Oocytes Activated in the Cytoplasm of In Vivo-Matured, Enucleated Oocytes

Spindles (n = 98) of in vitro-matured oocytes were transferred to enucleated, in vivo-matured oocytes. Eighty-two percent fused after electrical stimulation, and 77 of these 80 fused oocytes transformed into PN gametes that extruded a second polar body. When a female PN of these activated oocytes (n = 42) was exchanged with the female PN of in vivo zygotes, most (98%) of the reconstructed in vitro type 4 zygotes divided during overnight culture in S1. After transfer of type 4 zygotes to the oviduct of three pseudopregnant mice, two became pregnant, bearing a total of seven normal, live pups at 20 days after transfer (Table 1). Similarly, when the remainder of these activated oocytes (n = 42) were outfitted with a male PN, all the resultant in vitro type 5 zygotes divided during overnight culture. After transfer of in vitro type 5 zygotes to the oviducts of four pseudopregnant mice, two became pregnant, bearing a total of eight normal, live pups (Table 1). The live birth rates of type 4 and 5 zygotes were 17% and 23%, respectively, which are not significantly different from those observed with in vivo type 2 or both groups of type 3 zygotes (Table 1).


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Activation of mammalian oocytes is normally triggered by sperm penetration and encompasses several sequences of intracellular events, beginning with the release of Ca2+ and culminating in completion of the second meiotic division, extrusion of a second polar body, and formation of a haploid female PN. Metaphase II oocytes can also be activated artificially with electrical pulses [17]; treatment with a calcium ionophore-like A23187, ionomycin, strontium, or ethanol [12, 1821]; treatment with a protein synthesis inhibitor, such as cycloheximide [22]; or sequential combinations of these treatments [12, 19, 23]. These treatments elevate intracellular free Ca2+ levels [18] and consistently initiate molecular, genetic, and morphologic changes that closely resemble those seen after fertilization [23]. In this study, the combined A23187 + cycloheximide treatment activated approximately 90% of the in vitro- or in vivo-matured oocytes, as judged by the expulsion of a second polar body and the formation of a haploid PN. Fertilization-induced activation also produces alterations in other cellular processes that are needed if the egg is to support embryonic development to term. That these also occur during artificial activation is suggested by previous [12] and present observations that eggs activated by sequential A23187 + cycloheximide treatment are competent to support embryo development to term.

In this study, remarkably similar birth rates were observed following the transfer of several groups of experimentally constructed zygotes to the uteri of foster mother mice. However, two groups of constructed zygotes—in vitro type 1 and in vitro type 2—displayed birth rates that were significantly lower than those of all the other groups; in fact, only 1 of 152 transferred zygotes survived to term. In vitro type 1 zygotes were constructed by denuding and maturing immature eggs to M-II in vitro, activating them with A23187 + cycloheximide, and then "fertilizing" them with insertion of a male PN. In vitro type 2 zygotes were similarly constructed through artificial activation, but the resultant PN was then transferred into a fertilized zygote enucleated of its female PN. Although the failure of term development for in vitro type 1 and 2 zygotes may arise from any one of the experimental procedures used in their construction, the significantly higher rates seen with the in vivo type 1 and 2 and the in vitro type 4 and 5 zygotes allow us to rule out the cumulus stripping/maturation conditions, the activation treatments, and the PN transfer procedures as causal factors. In addition, the similar birth rates observed for the in vivo type 1, 2, and 3 zygotes and the in vitro type 3, 4, and 5 zygotes also rule out the oviductal transfer procedure as a cause for the poor pregnancy outcome with in vitro type 1 and 2 zygotes.

As noted above, cytogenetic analyses indicated that female PN which developed in the in vitro type 1 zygotes were consistently haploid. Thus, it is also unlikely that an anomalous segregation of chromosomes is the cause of the poor birth rate noted following transfer of these zygotes. The presence of a haploid genome also suggests that the activation process was properly completed. Such a conclusion is supported by our observations that diploid eggs were occasionally observed at 4 h following activation but failed to extrude a second polar body. Each in vitro type 2 zygote received a PN from an egg that had extruded a second polar body.

Previously, Schroeder and Eppig [24] reported that the pregnancy and birth rates of in vitro-matured mouse eggs are identical to those of eggs that matured in vivo. However, those authors also commented that such results were specific to their experimental conditions and could be influenced by a variety of factors, including the media employed and the experimental procedures under investigation. Thus, it is not surprising that other investigators have reported pregnancy and live birth rates following fertilization of in vitro-matured eggs that are appreciably lower than those of in vivo-matured eggs [2527]. Our results suggest an explanation for this latter observation—despite being morphologically and cytogenetically normal, the ability of female PN to support normal embryonic development may, nonetheless, be functionally compromised when they are activated in mouse eggs that have matured in vitro. The normal live birth rate observed following oviduct transfer of type 4 and 5 zygotes indicates that this anomaly in pronuclear function actually has its origins in the ooplasm at the time of activation. Thus, the M-II spindle of an in vitro-matured egg must be transferred into the cytoplasm of an in vivo-matured egg before activation for the resultant PN to be capable of supporting a normal birth rate. Similar results have been reported previously, even for less immature oocytes from growing follicles [10, 11]. Clearly, whether the maturation from GV to M-II occurs in vivo or in vitro has little influence on the functional potential of that nucleus to support later embryonic development.

Taken together, our results suggest the hypothesis that, during the transition from M-II to interphase following artificial activation, the ooplasmic milieu plays an important role in determining the functional competence of the resultant PN to support embryonic development to term. Previous studies from this laboratory suggest that functional competence is compromised during the preimplantation period [9]. A similar situation may also apply in the eggs of mice and other species when activation and PN formation is normally achieved by fertilization with a sperm.

During the final stages of maturation from GV to M-II, mouse oocytes undergo pronounced morphologic and biochemical changes that include the synthesis of new cytoplasmic proteins [28], protein phosphorylation [29], and intracellular Ca2+ oscillations [30]; similar changes have also been reported for other mammalian species, including humans [3133]. The newly synthesized proteins appear to be necessary for the oocyte to complete normal meiosis to M-II, and they may be involved in development of the PN after activation (mouse [34] and other mammals [3537]). Comparative studies of protein synthesis between in vitro- and in vivo-matured oocytes have revealed that several proteins with distinct molecular weights are present only in the cytoplasm of oocytes that matured in vivo (mouse [28] and other mammals [38, 39]). Studies in the rabbit and cow suggest that some of these proteins may depend on cumulus cell—oocyte interactions since more proteins are present in the cytoplasm when oocytes are cultured within an intact cumulus mass [33, 40, 41]. However, because mouse oocytes can complete meiosis and activation even when denuded of cumulus cells at the GV stage [6, 12, 24], the proteins important for these processes would appear to occur independently of cumulus cell contact. A similar argument can be raised for LH-stimulated protein synthesis, because these oocytes come from animals not treated with exogenous LH before collection or during culture.

In summary, we hypothesize that, during the oocyte activation process, its genome undergoes a functional transition, or switch, during the M-II to interphase interval that is important for normal embryonic development to continue until birth. The role of the ooplasm during this transition is to ensure that it is completed properly. The ooplasm of oocytes denuded of cumulus cells and matured in vitro appears to be incapable of switching the M-II nucleus to the interphase PN with full function. We speculate that gonadotropins and/or cumulus cell-dependent proteins normally deposited in the ooplasm in vivo may play a crucial role in this transition of nuclear function.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 18 October 2000.

1 Correspondence: Lewis C. Krey, Program for In Vitro Fertilization, New York University School of Medicine, 660 First Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, NY 10016. FAX: 212 263 8827; kreyivf{at}yahoo.com Back

Accepted: August 2, 2001.

Received: September 19, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Moor RM, Dai Y, Lee C, Fulka J Jr. Oocyte maturation and embryonic failure. Hum Reprod Update 1998 May–Jun; 4:223-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Trounson A, Anderiesz C, Jones GM, Kausche A, Lolatgis N, Wood C. Oocyte maturation. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: (suppl 3): 52-62
  3. Goud PT, Goud AP, Qian C, Laverge H, Van der Elst J, De Sutter P, Dhont M. In vitro maturation of human germinal vesicle stage oocytes: role of cumulus cells and epidermal growth factor in the culture medium. Hum Reprod 1998; 13:1638-1644[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Huang FJ, Chang SY, Tsai MY, Lin YC, Kung FT, Wu JF, Lu YJ. Relationship of the human cumulus-free oocyte maturational profile with in vitro outcome parameters after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999; 16:483-487[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Zhang L, Jiang S, Wozniak PJ, Yang X, Godke RA. Cumulus cell function during bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 40:338-344[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Liu H, Wang CW, Grifo JA, Krey LC, Zhang J. Reconstruction of mouse oocytes by germinal vesicle transfer: maturity of host oocyte cytoplasm determines meiosis. Hum Reprod 1999; 4:2357-2361
  7. Takeuchi T, Ergun B, Huang TH, Rosenwaks Z, Palermo GD. A reliable technique of nuclear transplantation for immature mammalian oocytes. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1312-1317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Zhang J, Wang CW, Krey L, Liu H, Meng L, Blaszczyk A, Adler A, Grifo J. In vitro maturation of human preovulatory oocytes reconstructed by germinal vesicle transfer. Fertil Steril 1999; 71:726-731[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Liu H, Zhang J, Krey LC, Grifo JA. In vitro development of mouse zygotes following reconstruction by sequential transfer of germinal vesicles and haploid pronuclei. Hum Reprod 2000; 115:1997-2002
  10. Kono T, Obata Y, Yoshizuma T, Nakahara T, Carroll J. Epigenetic modifications during oocyte growth correlates with extended parthenogenetic development in the mouse. Nat Genet 1996; 13:91-94[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Bao S, Obata Y, Carroll J, Domeki I, Kono T. Epigenetic modifications necessary for normal development are established during oocyte growth in mice. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:616-621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hagemann LJ, Hillery-Weinhold FL, Leibfried Rutledge ML, First NL. Activation of murine oocytes with Ca2+ ionophore and cycloheximide. J Exp Zool 1995; 271:57-61[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 1984; 308:548-550[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Barton SC, Norris ML, Surani MAH. Nuclear transplantation in fertilized and parthenogenetically activated eggs. In: Monk M (ed.), Mammalian Development—A Practical Approach. Oxford, England: IRL Press; 1987: 235–253
  15. Tarkowski AK. An air-drying method for chromosome preparations from mouse eggs. Cytogenetics 1966; 5:394-400[CrossRef]
  16. Hogan B, Beddington R, Costantini F, Lacy E. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1994: 170–184
  17. Ozil JP. The parthenogenetic development of rabbit oocytes after repetitive pulsatile electrical stimulation. Development 1990; 109:117-127[Abstract]
  18. Wang WH, Machaty Z, Ruddock N, Abeydeera LR, Boquest AC, Prather RS, Day BN. Activation of porcine oocytes with calcium ionophore: effects of extracellular calcium. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 53::99-107[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Ernst CA, Leibfried-Rutledge LM, Dentine MR. Development of an efficient method to produce uniformly haploid parthenogenones. J Exp Zool 1999; 284:112-118[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. O'Neill GT, Rolfe LR, Kaufman MH. Developmental potential and chromosome constitution of strontium-induced mouse parthenogenones. Mol Reprod Dev 1991; 30:214-219[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Kaufman MH. The chromosome complement of single-pronuclear haploid mouse embryos following activation by ethanol treatment. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1982; 71:139-154[Medline]
  22. Siracusa G, Whittingham DG, Molinaro M, Vivarelli E. Parthenogenetic activation of mouse oocytes induced by inhibitors of protein synthesis. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1978; 43:157-166[Medline]
  23. Liu L, Ju JC, Yang X. Differential inactivation of maturation-promoting factor and mitogen-activated protein kinase following parthenogenetic activation of bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1998; 59:537-545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schroeder AC, Eppig JJ. The developmental capacity of mouse oocytes that matured spontaneously in vitro is normal. Dev Biol 1984; 102:493-497[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Cross PC, Brinster RL. In vitro development of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 1970; 3:298-307[Abstract]
  26. Trounson A, Anderiesz C, Jones G. Maturation of human oocytes in vitro and their developmental competence. Reproduction 2001; 121::51-75[Abstract]
  27. Fulka J Jr, First NL, Moor RM. Nuclear and cytoplasmic determinants involved in the regulation of mammalian oocyte maturation. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4:41-49[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Schultz RM, LaMarca MJ, Wassarman PM. Absolute rates of protein synthesis during meiotic maturation of mammalian oocytes in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978; 75:4160-4164[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Endo Y, Kopf GS, Schultz RM. Stage-specific changes in protein phosphorylation accompanying meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes and fertilization of mouse eggs. J Exp Zool 1986; 239:401-409[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Carroll J, Swann K, Whittingham D, Whitaker M. Spatio-temporal dynamics of intracellular [Ca2+]i oscillations during the growth and meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Development 1994; 120:3507-3517[Abstract]
  31. Schultz GA, Gifford DJ, Mahadevan MM, Fleetham JA, Taylor PJ. Protein synthetic patterns in immature and mature human oocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1988; 541:237-247[Medline]
  32. Kastrop PM, Bevers MM, Destree OH, Kruip TA. Changes in protein synthesis and phosphorylation patterns during bovine oocyte maturation in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1990; 90:305-310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Wu B, Ignotz GG, Currie WB, Yang X. Temporal distinctions in the synthesis and accumulation of proteins by oocytes and cumulus cells during maturation in vitro of bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1996; 45:560-565[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wassarman PM, Letourneau GE. Meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes in vitro: association of newly synthesized proteins with condensing chromosomes. J Cell Sci 1976; 20:549-568[Abstract]
  35. Moor RM, Crosby IM. Protein requirements for germinal vesicle breakdown in ovine oocytes. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1986; 94:207-220[Medline]
  36. Ding J, Moor RM, Foxcroft GR. Effects of protein synthesis on maturation, sperm penetration, and pronuclear development in porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 33:59-66[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Le Gal F, Gall L, De Smedt V. Changes in protein synthesis pattern during in vitro maturation of goat oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 32:1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Warnes GM, Moor RM, Johnson MH. Changes in protein synthesis during maturation of sheep oocytes in vivo and in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1977; 49:331-335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Meinecke B, Schroter D. Protein neosynthesis by porcine oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro. DTW (Dtsch Tieraerztl Wochenschr) 1996; 103:328-331
  40. Motlik J, Fulka J Jr, Prochazka R, Rimkevicova Z, Kubelka M, Fulka J. RNA and protein synthesis requirements for the resumption of meiosis in rabbit oocytes: the role of cumulus cells. Reprod Nutr Dev 1989; 29:601-609
  41. Kastrop PM, Bevers MM, Destree OH, Kruip TA. Analysis of protein synthesis in morphologically classified bovine follicular oocytes before and after maturation in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1990; 26:222-226[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
E. Ibanez, A. Sanfins, C. M H Combelles, E. W Overstrom, and D. F Albertini
Genetic strain variations in the metaphase-II phenotype of mouse oocytes matured in vivo or in vitro
Reproduction, December 1, 2005; 130(6): 845 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. C. Chang, H. Liu, J. Zhang, J. Grifo, and L. C. Krey
Developmental incompetency of denuded mouse oocytes undergoing maturation in vitro is ooplasmic in nature and is associated with aberrant Oct-4 expression
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1958 - 1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S J Martins da Silva, J O Gardner, J E Taylor, A Springbett, P A De Sousa, and R A Anderson
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes bovine oocyte cytoplasmic competence for embryo development
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 423 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Sanfins, C. E. Plancha, E. W. Overstrom, and D. F. Albertini
Meiotic spindle morphogenesis in in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: insights into the relationship between nuclear and cytoplasmic quality
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2889 - 2899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Balakier, A. Sojecki, G. Motamedi, and C. Librach
Time-dependent capability of human oocytes for activation and pronuclear formation during metaphase II arrest
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 982 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Sanfins, G. Y. Lee, C. E. Plancha, E. W. Overstrom, and D. F. Albertini
Distinctions in Meiotic Spindle Structure and Assembly During In Vitro and In Vivo Maturation of Mouse Oocytes
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2059 - 2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Liu, H. C. Chang, J. Zhang, J. Grifo, and L. C. Krey
Metaphase II nuclei generated by germinal vesicle transfer in mouse oocytes support embryonic development to term
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1903 - 1907.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M.H. Combelles and D. F. Albertini
Assessment of Oocyte Quality Following Repeated Gonadotropin Stimulation in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 812 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.
Right arrow Articles by Grifo, J. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS