Biol Reprod
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.
Biology of Reproduction 66, 180-184 (2002)
© 2002 Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.


Regular Article

Effect of Type 3 and Type 4 Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors on the Maintenance of Bovine Oocytes in Meiotic Arrest1

Mario A. Mayesa, and Marc-André Sirard2,a

a Centre de Recherche en Biologie de la Reproduction (C.R.B.R.), Département des Sciences Animales, Université Laval, Ste. Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The use of broad-spectrum inhibitors first suggested that phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are involved in the maturation of bovine oocytes. Modulation of individual PDE families is now possible with the use of newly developed type-specific PDE inhibitors. This study evaluated the role of type 3- and type 4-specific PDE inhibitors on the meiotic arrest of bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) and denuded oocytes (DOs). It also evaluated the role of these specific inhibitors on meiotic arrest when COCs are incubated in the presence or absence of theca cell monolayers. Bovine COCs were aspirated from ovaries collected at the abattoir. Denuded oocytes and COCs were incubated for 12 h in culture medium alone or culture medium containing the type 3 PDE inhibitors cilostamide (10 and 20 µM) or milrinone (10 and 50 µM) or the type 4 PDE inhibitor rolipram (10 and 50 µM). Oocytes were then fixed and classified according to the status of nuclear maturation. Cumulus-oocyte complexes were coincubated with untreated theca cell monolayers or theca cell monolayers treated with the different specific PDE inhibitors. Bovine COCs or DOs incubated in culture medium resumed meiosis, but supplementation of the culture medium with the PDE3 inhibitors cilostamide or milrinone resulted in meiotic arrest. On the other hand, supplementation of the culture medium with rolipram did not prevent oocyte maturation. Furthermore, PDE3 inhibitors, but not PDE 4 inhibitors, had an additive effect on the inhibitory action of theca cell monolayers on oocyte maturation. These data support the hypothesis that inhibition of PDE3 prevents the meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes, whereas inhibition of PDE4 does not block oocyte maturation even under normally inhibitory conditions. The additive effect of PDE3 inhibitors on the ability of theca cells to maintain bovine oocytes in meiotic arrest suggests that type 3 PDE has an important role in meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes.

cyclic adenosine monophosphate, meiosis, ovum, phosphodiesterases, theca cells


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Bovine oocytes enter meiosis early during fetal development, but they soon become arrested at the diplotene stage of the first meiotic division and remain arrested until undergoing ovulation, atresia, or removal from the follicle. However, bovine oocytes must measure at least 110 µm in diameter to be considered competent to resume meiosis and to complete their nuclear maturation [1, 2]. The resumption of meiosis occurs in vivo after the endogenous preovulatory surge of LH [3], whereas in vitro, oocytes spontaneously resume meiosis after their removal from the follicular microenvironment [4].

The somatic components of the follicle have been implicated in the maintenance of meiotic arrest [57]. Original studies proposed that the inhibitory factor(s) originated from granulosa cells [8, 9]. However, further experiments showed that isolated theca cell layers or theca cells cultured in monolayers secrete an inhibitory factor capable of maintaining cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) in meiotic arrest [7, 10]. Denuded oocytes (DOs) do not respond to the inhibitory action of theca cell monolayers [7, 10]

The second messenger cAMP has been shown to play a key role in the maintenance of bovine oocytes in meiotic arrest. High levels of cAMP in the oocyte induced by the addition of membrane-permeable cAMP derivatives such as dbcAMP or 8-bromo-3',5'-cAMP (8-Br-cAMP) have an inhibitory effect on meiotic resumption [11, 12]. However, high levels of cAMP present in cumulus cells result in meiotic resumption [13, 14]. Therefore, the levels of cAMP present in the somatic or germ cell compartment could be used to modulate the meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes.

The total levels of cAMP found in the oocyte depend primarily on the rate of synthesis by adenylate cyclase (AC) and the rate of degradation by phosphodiesterases (PDE). In the bovine, AC activity has been localized to the cumulus cells and to the plasma membrane of the oocyte [13, 15]. Early studies showed that purines and nucleosides influence the activity of adenylate cyclase [16]. However, it is uncertain whether the oocyte is able to produce enough cAMP to prevent meiotic resumption [17].

Phosphodiesterases hydrolyze the 3' phosphoester bond of the 3',5' purine ribose cyclic monophosphates cAMP and cGMP, thereby transforming them to their corresponding biologically inactive monophosphates. At least 11 different PDE families have been identified since the original purification and characterization of PDE activity [1822]. Phosphodiesterase families can be identified based on their kinetics and substrate characteristics, inhibitor profiles, allosteric activators and inhibitors, and amino acid sequences [20]. Phosphodiesterases are composed of a catalytic domain, which is connected to the amino and carboxy terminal domains by hinge regions [21]. It is believed that the catalytic domain is structurally homologous between PDEs of the same family, while the other domains act as modulators of the catalytic center [19].

Original experiments used nonselective or first-generation PDE inhibitors, such as IBMX (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine), papaverine, theophylline, and pentoxifylline, to study PDE activity [23]. These inhibitors exert no directed action against any one type of PDE but in general inhibit many isozymes. These studies suggested that PDEs are involved in oocyte maturation [24]. The lack of specificity, inhibition of adenosine action, and induction of toxic side effects of these inhibitors limit their usefulness. Approximately 45% of bovine COCs incubated in the presence of 0.2 mM IBMX are temporarily prevented from resuming meiosis [11]. More recently, second-generation or isozyme-specific PDE inhibitors have permitted evaluation of the physiologic role of specific PDE isoenzymes in the overall cyclic nucleotide degradation pathway of the intact cell. These inhibitors act mainly as active site competitors and are used to develop pharmacologic treatments with fewer undesirable side effects [25]. In addition, pharmacologic profiles of individual PDE isoenzymes can be created based on their response to specific PDE inhibitors. The concentration at which these specific inhibitors are used plays a role in their specificity [2628]. Recent studies used specific PDE inhibitors to demonstrate the presence of PDE3A in rat and mouse oocytes. These inhibitors prevent oocyte maturation both in vivo and in vitro [18, 29].

The PDE3 family shows high affinity for cAMP as a substrate and is inhibited by the presence of cGMP, which binds tightly to the enzyme and it is poorly hydrolyzed. Thus, micromolar concentrations of cGMP greatly inhibit cAMP hydrolysis [3032]. This PDE family, which is also known as cGMP-inhibited PDE (cGI-PDE), has at least two different gene products: PDE3A and PDE3B. Cilostamide and milrinone are specific PDE3 inhibitors [33].

The PDE4 family or cAMP-specific PDE hydrolyzes cAMP with high affinity. However, the PDE4 family, unlike the PDE3 family, is not inhibited by cGMP [34, 35]. This family has at least four different gene products with two or more alternative splice variants differently expressed in different tissues [20]. Rolipram is routinely used as a specific PDE4 inhibitor.

This study was undertaken to evaluate the specific role of PDE inhibitors on meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes. Since high concentrations of cAMP in the cumulus cells compared to high concentrations of cAMP in the oocyte result in opposite effects on meiotic resumption [13], it is quite possible that these cell types have different PDEs. The focus of this study was placed on the role of type 3 and type 4 PDEs. The effect of type-specific inhibitors was also evaluated in the presence or absence of theca cell monolayers.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preparation of Theca Cell Monolayers

Bovine theca cell monolayers were prepared as previously described [10]. Bovine follicles measuring 2–5 mm in diameter were randomly chosen from ovaries that were kept on ice in bags containing gauze soaked with saline solution. Follicles were dissected free of stromal tissue with scissors. Theca cells were harvested exclusively from transparent follicles containing at least 75% of the granulosa layer intact and unexpanded COCs. Selected follicles were placed in a calcium- and magnesium-free Hanks balanced salt solution and cut into hemisections with a scalpel. Granulosa cells and COCs were removed by scraping the hemisections with a fine glass loop made from a Pasteur pipette. This technique is used to effectively isolate theca cell layers. The theca layers (n = 20) were enzymatically digested in 15 ml of modified Hanks solution supplemented with 2125 U of collagenase type II, 1600 U trypsin from porcine pancreas, 1 mg DNase type I, and 2 mg EDTA (all from Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO). Enzymatic digestion took place for 1 h at 38.5°C in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Theca layers were passed through a 10-ml pipette every 20 min. After incubation, larger pieces of remaining follicular hemisections were withdrawn from the solution. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 6 ml of washing medium consisting of Hepes-buffered Tyrode medium (TLH, pH 7.4) [36] supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (heat-treated FCS; Flow Laboratories, McLean, VA), 0.2 mM pyruvic acid, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate. Cells were then centrifuged (10 min at 2000 x g), resuspended, and washed a second time. The first and second pellets were resuspended in 10 ml and 1 ml, respectively, of washing medium. Theca cells were counted with a hemocytometer and seeded in a 24-well plate (Falcon Becton Dickinson, Rutherford, NJ) at a concentration of 1.5–2.0 x 105 cells/ml. The culture medium, consisting of TCM-199 with Earle salts (Gibco Laboratories, Grand Island, NY) and bicarbonate (Sigma), 10% FCS, 0.2 mM pyruvic acid, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin sulfate, was pre-exposed to culture conditions (38.5°C, 5% CO2:95% air atmosphere with 100% humidity) for at least 2 h. The culture medium was replenished every 48 h, and follicular cells were incubated for 5–7 days. When the monolayers were confluent, the medium was replenished and conditioned for 48 h.

Collection of COCs

Bovine ovaries at various stages of their reproductive cycle were collected at the slaughterhouse and transported to the laboratory in saline solution kept between 30°C and 35°C. The saline solution consisted of 0.9% NaCl (w:v supplemented with 100 000 IU penicillin, 100 mg streptomycin, and 250 µg amphotericin B per liter, all from Sigma). The contents of follicles measuring 1–5 mm were aspirated with a 10-ml syringe and an 18-gauge needle. The follicular contents were pooled in 50-ml conical tubes. After sedimentation, the COCs were recovered with the use of a stereomicroscope. The COCs used in these experiments had at least five layers of cumulus cells. The COCs were rinsed twice in the supernatant of follicular fluid (centrifuged for 10 min at 350 x g) and then transferred to the respective treatments.

Chemicals

Millimolar stock concentrations of PDE inhibitors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), stored at -20°C, and diluted into culture medium. The chemicals were added to the culture medium or the theca cell monolayers approximately 4 h before the oocytes were added. Final concentrations of DMSO never exceeded 0.1%, and equal amounts of carrier were added to control groups of cells.

Denuded Oocytes

In experiment 1, cumulus cells were removed from the COCs before they were cultured in the presence of PDE inhibitors. Selected COCs were vortexed for 10 min in sterile centrifuge tubes containing follicular fluid supernatant (prepared as indicated previously). After they were vortexed, the oocytes were rinsed in follicular fluid supernatant. Denuded oocytes with a homogeneous cytoplasm were then allocated to their respective treatments.

Fixation of Oocytes

At the end of each treatment, COCs were transferred into 2-ml centrifuge tubes containing 500 µl of TLH and vortex-agitated for 7 min to remove the cumulus cells. Denuded oocytes were recovered under a stereomicroscope and transferred onto a glass slide in a small drop. A Vaseline:paraffin wax mixture was used to maintain the coverslip in contact with the oocytes. The coverslip was fixed in place with epoxy glue, and the slides were immersed in a fixative solution (ethanol:acetic acid, 3:1) for a minimum of 24 h. Oocytes were then stained with 1% aceto-orcein and examined for nuclear morphology with a phase contrast microscope at 100x and 400x magnification [37].

Experimental Design

Experiment 1: effect of PDE inhibitors on the maturation of denuded bovine oocytes In experiment 1, COCs were denuded and then allocated in groups of 15–20 oocytes per treatment. Denuded oocytes were either fixed at time zero or incubated for 12 h in culture medium or culture medium supplemented with the PDE inhibitors cilostamide (10 and 20 µM), milrinone (10 and 50 µM), or rolipram (10 and 50 µM). In addition, a group of oocytes were treated with 0.1% DMSO to determine if the carrier itself used at the highest dose had an effect on meiotic resumption.

Experiment 2: effect of PDE inhibitors on the maturation of bovine COCs In experiment 2, COCs were incubated in culture medium alone or culture medium supplemented with the same PDE inhibitors used in experiment 1. The COCs were denuded after 12 h of treatment and fixed as previously described.

Experiment 3: effect of PDE inhibitors on the maturation of bovine COCs incubated in the presence of theca cell monolayers In experiment 3, groups of 15–20 COCs were incubated for 12 h with untreated theca cell monolayers or theca cell monolayers treated with the same PDE inhibitors used in experiment 2. The effect of DMSO on oocyte maturation was also tested by culturing COCs in the presence of theca cell monolayers supplemented with 0.1% DMSO.

Statistical Analysis

The status of nuclear maturation of 1201 oocytes was evaluated with a contrast microscope immediately after staining with aceto-orcein. Oocytes with a nuclear membrane present were classified as germinal vesicle (GV) stage, while those without a nuclear membrane were classified as having undergone germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) and thus meiotic resumption. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. When ANOVA indicated a significant effect of treatment (P < 0.05), treatment differences were compared by the Duncan multiple range test.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In experiment 1, COCs denuded of their cumulus cells (i.e., DOs) were incubated in the presence of specific PDE inhibitors for 12 h. Denuded oocytes incubated in the culture medium alone or in the presence of rolipram at either 10 or 20 µM did not remain at the GV stage (3.3% ± 1.7%, 3.0% ± 3.3%, and 0% ± 0% GV, respectively). However, DOs incubated for 12 h in the presence of 10 and 20 µM cilostamide or 50 µM milrinone remained in meiotic arrest (61.2% ± 9.5%, 68.1% ± 7.7%, and 49.2% ± 14% GV, respectively). However, milrinone did not prevent meiotic resumption when used at the 10 µM dose. Denuded oocytes incubated with PDE3 inhibitors remained in meiotic arrest, whereas DOs incubated with PDE4 inhibitors resumed meiosis (Fig. 1).



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1. Effect of specific PDE inhibitors on the maturation of denuded bovine oocytes. Groups of 15–20 denuded bovine oocytes were incubated in the presence of 20 µM cilostamide, 50 µM milrinone, or 50 µM rolipram for 12 h. The effect of DMSO as a carrier was tested at the highest dose used (0.1%). The percentage of oocytes in GV stage was determined. Statistical analysis by ANOVA showed a significant effect of treatment (P < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan multiple range test. (Data shown were derived from 3 replicates, 431 DOs.)

In experiment 2, COCs were incubated in the presence or absence of specific PDE inhibitors for 12 h. Cumulus-oocyte complexes incubated in culture medium resumed meiosis, as did those COCs incubated with the type 4 PDE inhibitor rolipram. In contrast, COCs incubated in the presence of PDE3 inhibitors did not resume meiosis. Cilostamide used at 10 and 20 µM maintained COCs at the GV stage (30.4% ± 15.2% and 46.3% ± 5.3% GV, respectively). Incubation of COCs in the presence of 50 µM milrinone maintained 22.5% ± 0.3% of treated COCs at the GV stage. However, milrinone used at the 10 µM dose maintained only 3.9% ± 2% of those COCs treated in meiotic arrest, which was not significantly different from the percentages of meiotic arrest obtained when COCs were left untreated. Cumulus-oocyte complexes treated with PDE3 inhibitors remain in meiotic arrest, whereas those treated with PDE4 inhibitors resumed meiosis (Fig. 2).



View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2. Effect of specific PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitors on the maturation of bovine COCs. Bovine COCs were incubated in the presence of 20 µM cilostamide, 50 µM milrinone, or 50 µM rolipram for 12 h. The percentage of oocytes in GV stage was determined. Statistical analysis by ANOVA showed a significant effect of treatment (P < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan multiple range test. (Data shown were derived from 3 replicates, 360 COCs.)

In experiment 3, COCs were coincubated with theca cell monolayers in the presence or absence of type-specific PDE inhibitors. Theca cell monolayers maintained 36.5% ± 3.4% of the oocytes in meiotic arrest. The addition of 0.1% DMSO to the coincubated COCs and theca cells did not have a significant effect. The addition of rolipram, a type 4 PDE inhibitor, at either 10 or 50 µM, had no effect on the meiotic arrest maintained by theca cells.

The addition of PDE3 inhibitors to the coincubation significantly increased the number of oocytes arrested at the GV stage (P < 0.05). The percentage of oocytes at the GV stage increased to more than 80% when they were treated with cilostamide (Fig. 3). Milrinone at both 10 and 50 µM also significantly increased the rate of meiotic arrest (61% ± 4.9% and 83.2% ± 7.6% GV, respectively). Under these experimental conditions, cilostamide and milrinone were both equally effective in enhancing the ability of theca cells to maintain the COCs in meiotic arrest.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3. Effect of specific PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitors on the maturation of bovine COCs incubated with theca cell monolayers. Bovine COCs were incubated for 12 h in contact with theca cell monolayers in presence of 20 µM cilostamide, 50 µM milrinone, or 50 µM rolipram. The percentage of oocytes in GV stage was determined. Statistical analysis by ANOVA showed a significant effect of treatment (P < 0.05). Different letters indicate significant differences according to the Duncan multiple range test. (Data shown were derived from 3 replicates, 410 COCs.)


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The second messenger cAMP plays a crucial role in the maturation of mammalian oocytes. However, the exact role of cAMP in the maintenance of bovine COCs in meiotic arrest is not entirely clear. It would seem that high levels of cAMP in the cumulus cells that surround the oocyte induce meiotic resumption, whereas high levels of cAMP inside the oocyte result in meiotic arrest [13]. The extensive network of gap junctions between the oocyte and the cumulus cells could facilitate the transfer of cAMP between these two compartments [38]. Nonetheless, the direct transfer of cAMP from the cumulus cells to the oocyte has not been fully demonstrated [39], but when levels of cAMP are high in cumulus cells, then they are also high in the oocyte [14, 40]. High levels of cAMP in the cumulus cells may induce the release of a signal or signals that trigger meiotic resumption despite the presence of high levels of cAMP in the oocyte [13].

Raising the levels of cAMP in bovine oocytes by treating them with an activator of AC (forskolin) or cAMP analogues (dbcAMP and 8-Br-cAMP) transiently delays meiotic resumption, thus supporting the idea that high levels of cAMP in the oocyte affect oocyte maturation [14]. Electron microscopy studies have shown that an increase in AC levels in the cumulus cell projections contacting the oocyte occurs only after forskolin stimulation. In the absence of this stimulation, the oocyte might not have enough AC enzymatic activity to affect its nuclear maturation [15].

Preventing the degradation of cAMP by means of treatment with broad-spectrum PDE inhibitors such as IBMX can also transiently delay meiotic resumption [11]. A transient effect of IBMX on meiotic arrest was observed after incubating bovine COCs with IBMX for 8 h; however, this effect was not noticeable after 24 h [13]. In addition, IBMX is more effective in preventing the resumption of meiosis in zona-free oocytes than in COCs. Treatment of COCs with IBMX increases the levels of cAMP in both the cumulus cells and the oocyte. Cumulus-oocyte complexes treated with IBMX contain approximately twice the level of cAMP found in untreated COCs [13].

In this study, PDE3 and PDE4 inhibitors were used to determine whether type 3 and type 4 PDEs play a role in modulating the resumption of meiosis of bovine oocytes. The PDE3 inhibitors cilostamide and milrinone maintained bovine oocytes in meiotic arrest. On the other hand, the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram used under the same experimental conditions did not block oocyte maturation. These results suggest a role for PDE3 in the meiotic arrest of bovine COCs and more specifically in denuded bovine oocytes. The ability of cilostamide and milrinone to inhibit meiotic resumption suggests that inhibition of PDE3 prevents meiotic resumption in bovine oocytes [41]. Similar results have been observed in rat oocytes both in vitro [29] and in vivo [42]. Cilostamide is more effective than milrinone in maintaining meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes. The higher dose required to obtain meiotic arrest with milrinone has also been reported in rat oocytes [29].

Theca cell monolayers have been shown to be effective in maintaining bovine COCs, but not DOs, in meiotic arrest [10, 43]. Our laboratory has demonstrated that the inhibitory factor produced by the theca cell requires that the cumulus cells be in direct contact with the oocyte. The cumulus cells play a key role in either transporting or processing the inhibitory factor produced by the theca cell monolayers [10]. In addition, modulation of cAMP is important in controlling meiotic arrest of bovine COCs incubated with theca cell monolayers [43]. The addition of PDE3 inhibitors to the coincubation of COCs and theca cell monolayers had an additive effect on meiotic arrest. Incubation of COCs in the presence of theca cell monolayers and type 3 PDE inhibitors produced higher rates of meiotic arrest than those obtained by incubating the COCs in the presence of untreated theca cell monolayers. However, the type 4 PDE inhibitor rolipram did not have an additive effect. The additive effect observed by treating theca cell monolayers with PDE3 inhibitors suggests that the factor(s) produced by the theca cell monolayers act upstream from the site of action of PDE3 inhibition. The theca cell factor(s) may act indirectly by decreasing the activity of type 3 PDEs. We suggest that these two inhibitory mechanisms are complementary or possibly alternative methods to maintain meiotic arrest. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors will act by regulating cAMP, whereas theca cells might use one or more alternative mechanisms. Unfortunately, the mechanism(s) used by theca cell monolayers to maintain meiotic arrest has not yet been elucidated.

Another way to explain these results is based on the ability of the COCs to respond to the inhibitory signals. There might be differences in the oocytes' ability to respond to the inhibitory signals despite the care taken to select, as much as possible, a morphologically homogenous population of COCs. This hypothesis is supported by the fact that neither system is capable of maintaining all of the treated oocytes in meiotic arrest. When used in conjunction, both systems might be able to target more oocytes than either one alone. The remaining unresponsive oocytes are probably already committed to meiotic resumption.

Incubation of oocytes with rolipram had no significant effect under any other of the experimental conditions tested. This finding suggests that PDE4 is not involved in the maintenance of meiotic arrest of bovine oocytes. Because of the considerable amount of research done both in vitro [25, 29, 44] and in vivo with rolipram [42] we believe that the product's inability to maintain meiotic arrest is not a result of a lack of permeability across the plasma membrane.

Differential regulation of cAMP levels by PDEs might explain the role of cAMP in meiotic resumption. The localization of active PDE subtypes to different cell type compartments such as somatic or germ cells appears to play an important role in the regulation of meiosis [29, 38]. It was recently reported that treatment of mural granulosa cells with the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in the level of cAMP relative to controls, whereas treatment with the PDE3 inhibitor milrinone did not increase cAMP levels in those cells [45]. Therefore, preferential activation of certain PDE subtypes in the cumulus cells or the oocyte might determine whether the oocyte remains in meiotic arrest or proceeds to meiotic resumption.

In conclusion, the results of this study show that inhibition of PDE3 prevents meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes, whereas inhibition of PDE4 does not block oocyte maturation. Furthermore, the additive effect of PDE3 inhibitors on the meiotic arrest maintained by theca cell monolayers suggests that PDE3 plays a role in meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors would like to express their gratitude to François Richard, Ph.D., for his critical review of the manuscript.


    FOOTNOTES
 
First decision: 8 March 2000.

1 This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). Back

2 Correspondence: Marc-André Sirard, Département des Sciences Animales, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Cité Universitaire, Ste. Foy, PQ, Canada G1K 7P4. FAX: 418 656 3766; marc-andre.sirard{at}crbr.ulaval.ca Back

Accepted: August 28, 2001.

Received: January 31, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fair T, Hyttel P, Greve T. Bovine oocyte diameter in relation to maturational competence and transcriptional activity. Mol Reprod Dev 1995; 42:437-442[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Hyttel P, Fair T, Callesen H, Greve T. Oocyte growth, capacitation and final maturation in cattle. Theriogenology 1997; 47:23-32
  3. Hyttel P, Callesen H, Greve T. Ultrastructural features of preovulatory oocyte maturation in superovulated cattle. J Reprod Fertil 1986; 76::645-656[Abstract]
  4. Pincus G, Enzmann E. The comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vitro and in vivo. J Exp Med 1935; 62:665-675[Abstract]
  5. De Loos FA, Zeinstra E, Bevers MM. Follicular wall maintains meiotic arrest in bovine oocytes cultured in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 1994;; 39:162-165[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Carbonneau G, Sirard MA. Influence of follicular wall on meiotic resumption of bovine oocytes when cultured inside or outside hemisections. J Reprod Dev 1994; 40:125-132
  7. Richard FJ, Sirard MA. Effects of follicular cells on oocyte maturation. I: Effects of follicular hemisections on bovine oocyte maturation in vitro. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:16-21[Abstract]
  8. Sirard MA, Bilodeau S. Granulosa cells inhibit the resumption of meiosis in bovine oocytes in vitro. Biol Reprod 1990; 43:777-783[Abstract]
  9. Sirard MA, Coenen K, Bilodeau S. Effect of fresh or cultured follicular fractions on meiotic resumption in bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 1992; 37:39-58[CrossRef]
  10. Richard FJ, Sirard MA. Effects of follicular cells on oocyte maturation. II: Theca cell inhibition of bovine oocyte maturation in vitro. Biol Reprod 1996; 54:22-28[Abstract]
  11. Sirard MA, First NL. In vitro inhibition of oocyte nuclear maturation in the bovine. Biol Reprod 1988; 39:229-234[Abstract]
  12. Downs SM, Hunzicker-Dunn M. Differential regulation of oocyte maturation and cumulus expansion in the mouse oocyte-cumulus cell complex by site-selective analogs of cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Dev Biol 1995; 172:72-85[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bilodeau S, Fortier MA, Sirard MA. Effect of adenylate cyclase stimulation on meiotic resumption and cyclic AMP content of zona-free and cumulus-enclosed bovine oocytes in vitro. J Reprod Fertil 1993; 97:5-11[Abstract]
  14. Aktas H, Wheeler MB, Rosenkrans CF Jr, First NL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML. Maintenance of bovine oocytes in prophase of meiosis I by high [cAMP]i. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 105:227-235[Abstract]
  15. Kuyt JR, Kruip TA, de Jong-Brink M. Cytochemical localization of adenylate cyclase in bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes. Exp Cell Res 1988; 174:139-145[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Polan ML, DeCherney AH, Haseltine FP, Mezer HC, Behrman HR. Adenosine amplifies follicle-stimulating hormone action in granulosa cells and luteinizing hormone action in luteal cells of rat and human ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1983; 56:288-294[Abstract]
  17. Tsafriri A, Dekel N. Molecular mechanisms in ovulation. In: Findlay JK (ed.), Molecular Biology of the Female Reproductive System. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994: 207–258.
  18. Conti M. Phosphodiesterases and cyclic nucleotide signaling in endocrine cells. Mol Endocrinol 2000; 14:1317-1327[Free Full Text]
  19. Conti M, Hin SL. The molecular biology of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol 1999; 63:1-38[Medline]
  20. Beavo JA. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases: functional implications of multiple isoforms. Physiol Rev 1995; 75:725-748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Conti M, Jin SL, Monaco L, Repaske DR, Swinnen JV. Hormonal regulation of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases. Endocr Rev 1991;; 12:218-234[Medline]
  22. Fisher DA, Smith JF, Pillar JS, St. Denis SH, Cheng JB. Isolation and characterization of PDE9A, a novel human cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:15559-15564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Downs SM, Daniel SA, Bornslaeger EA, Hoppe PC, Eppig JJ. Maintenance of meiotic arrest in mouse oocytes by purines: modulation of cAMP levels and cAMP phosphodiesterase activity. Gamete Res 1989; 23:323-334[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Sadler SE, Maller JL. A similar pool of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase in Xenopus oocytes is stimulated by insulin, insulin-like growth factor 1, and [Val12,Thr59]Ha-ras protein. J Biol Chem 1989; 264:856-861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Atienza JM, Susanto D, Huang C, McCarty AS, Colicelli J. Identification of inhibitor specificity determinants in a mammalian phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:4839-4847[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Reeves ML, Leight BK, England PJ. The identification of a new cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase activity in human and guinea-pig cardiac ventricle. Biochem J 1987; 241:535-541[Medline]
  27. Weishaar RE, Burrows SD, Kobylarz DC, Quade MM, Evans DB. Multiple molecular forms of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase in cardiac and smooth muscle and in platelets: isolation, characterization, and effects of various reference phosphodiesterase inhibitors and cardiotonic agents. Biochem Pharmacol 1986; 35:787-800[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Hidaka H, Hayashi H, Kohri H, Kimura Y, Hosokawa T, Igawa T, Saitoh Y. Selective inhibitor of platelet cyclic adenosine monophosphate phosphodiesterase, cilostamide, inhibits platelet aggregation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1979; 211:26-30[Free Full Text]
  29. Tsafriri A, Chun SY, Zhang R, Hsueh AJ, Conti M. Oocyte maturation involves compartmentalization and opposing changes of cAMP levels in follicular somatic and germ cells: studies using selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Dev Biol 1996; 178:393-402[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Loten EG, Assimacopoulos-Jeannet FD, Exton JH, Park CR. Stimulation of a low Km phosphodiesterase from liver by insulin and glucagon. J Biol Chem 1978; 253:746-757[Free Full Text]
  31. Meacci E, Taira M, Moos M Jr, Smith CJ, Movsesian MA, Degerman E, Belfrage P, Manganiello V. Molecular cloning and expression of human myocardial cGMP-inhibited cAMP phosphodiesterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89:3721-3725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Taira M, Hockman SC, Calvo JC, Belfrage P, Manganiello VC. Molecular cloning of the rat adipocyte hormone-sensitive cyclic GMP-inhibited cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase. J Biol Chem 1993; 268::18573-18579[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Harrison SA, Reifsnyder DH, Gallis B, Cadd GG, Beavo JA. Isolation and characterization of bovine cardiac muscle cGMP-inhibited phosphodiesterase: a receptor for new cardiotonic drugs. Mol Pharmacol 1986; 29:506-514[Abstract]
  34. Swinnen JV, Joseph DR, Conti M. The mRNA encoding a high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase is regulated by hormones and cAMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:8197-8201[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Colicelli J, Birchmeier C, Michaeli T, O'Neill K, Riggs M, Wigler M. Isolation and characterization of a mammalian gene encoding a high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86:3599-3603[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bavister BD, Leibfried ML, Lieberman G. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol Reprod 1983; 28:235-247[Abstract]
  37. Motlik J, Koefoed-Johnsen HH, Fulka J. Breakdown of the germinal vesicle in bovine oocytes cultivated in vitro. J Exp Zool 1978; 205::377-383[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Eppig JJ, Downs SM. Chemical signals that regulate mammalian oocyte maturation. Biol Reprod 1984; 30:1-11[Abstract]
  39. Schultz RM, Montgomery RR, Belanoff JR. Regulation of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation: implication of a decrease in oocyte cAMP and protein dephosphorylation in commitment to resume meiosis. Dev Biol 1983; 97:264-273[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Aktas H, Wheeler MB, First NL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML. Maintenance of meiotic arrest by increasing [cAMP]i may have physiological relevance in bovine oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 1995; 105:237-245[Abstract]
  41. Mayes MA. Effect of type 3 and type 4 phosphodiesterase inhibitors on the maintenance of bovine cumulus-enclosed oocytes in meiotic arrest. In: Program of the annual conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society; 2000; Maastricht, The Netherlands. Abstract 458
  42. Wiersma A, Hirsch B, Tsafriri A, Hanssen RG, Van de Kant M, Kloosterboer HJ, Conti M, Hsueh AJ. Phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitors suppress oocyte maturation and consequent pregnancy without affecting ovulation and cyclicity in rodents. J Clin Invest 1998; 102:532-537[Medline]
  43. Richard FJ, Fortier MA, Sirard MA. Role of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase in the control of meiotic resumption in bovine oocytes cultured with theca cell monolayers. Biol Reprod 1997; 56:1363-1369[Abstract]
  44. DiSanto ME, Heaslip RJ. Rolipram inhibition of phosphodiesterase-4 activation. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 290:169-172[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Gilchrist RB, Thomas RE, Armstrong DT. Bovine oocyte meiotic maturation and granulosa cell cAMP levels are differentially regulated by type-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitors. In: Program of the 34th annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Reproduction; 2001; Ottawa, ON, Canada. Abstract 83



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A. Mayes, M. F. Laforest, C. Guillemette, R. B. Gilchrist, and F. J. Richard
Adenosine 5'-Monophosphate Kinase-Activated Protein Kinase (PRKA) Activators Delay Meiotic Resumption in Porcine Oocytes
Biol Reprod, April 1, 2007; 76(4): 589 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
F. J. Richard
Regulation of meiotic maturation
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(13_suppl): E4 - E6.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Nogueira, R. Ron-El, S. Friedler, M. Schachter, A. Raziel, R. Cortvrindt, and J. Smitz
Meiotic Arrest In Vitro by Phosphodiesterase 3-Inhibitor Enhances Maturation Capacity of Human Oocytes and Allows Subsequent Embryonic Development
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2006; 74(1): 177 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. C. Pace and P. Thomas
Steroid-Induced Oocyte Maturation in Atlantic Croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) Is Dependent on Activation of the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase/Akt Signal Transduction Pathway
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2005; 73(5): 988 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D Nogueira, R Cortvrindt, B Everaerdt, and J Smitz
Effects of long-term in vitro exposure to phosphodiesterase type-3 inhibitors on follicle and oocyte development
Reproduction, August 1, 2005; 130(2): 177 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R.E. Thomas, J.G. Thompson, D.T. Armstrong, and R.B. Gilchrist
Effect of Specific Phosphodiesterase Isoenzyme Inhibitors During In Vitro Maturation of Bovine Oocytes on Meiotic and Developmental Capacity
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1142 - 1149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. E. Thomas, D. T. Armstrong, and R. B. Gilchrist
Bovine Cumulus Cell-Oocyte Gap Junctional Communication During In Vitro Maturation in Response to Manipulation of Cell-Specific Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosophate Levels
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2004; 70(3): 548 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. M. Luciano, S. Modina, R. Vassena, E. Milanesi, A. Lauria, and F. Gandolfi
Role of Intracellular Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Concentration and Oocyte-Cumulus Cells Communications on the Acquisition of the Developmental Competence During In Vitro Maturation of Bovine Oocyte
Biol Reprod, February 1, 2004; 70(2): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Nogueira, R. Cortvrindt, D.G. De Matos, L. Vanhoutte, and J. Smitz
Effect of Phosphodiesterase Type 3 Inhibitor on Developmental Competence of Immature Mouse Oocytes In Vitro
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2003; 69(6): 2045 - 2052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
D. Nogueira, C. Albano, T. Adriaenssens, R. Cortvrindt, C. Bourgain, P. Devroey, and J. Smitz
Human Oocytes Reversibly Arrested in Prophase I by Phosphodiesterase Type 3 Inhibitor In Vitro
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 1042 - 1052.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mayes, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sirard, M.-A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS